aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-03-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28998: rpc: "addpeeraddress tried" return error on failureAva Chow
99954f914f031c80aa53daa367fc049c4c55bdf3 test: fix test to ensure hidden RPC is present in detailed help (stratospher) 0d01f6f0c6e53c9765f84e0616ab46b83923a6ad test: remove unused mocktime in test_addpeeraddress (0xb10c) 6205466512d4b94d1e507a77ab2151425790d29f rpc: "addpeeraddress tried" return error on failure (0xb10c) Pull request description: When trying to add an address to the IP address manager tried table, it's first added to the new table and then moved to the tried table. Previously, adding a conflicting address to the address manager's tried table with test-only `addpeeraddress tried=true` RPC would return `{ "success": true }`. However, the address would not be added to the tried table, but would remain in the new table. This caused, e.g., issue #28964. This is fixed by new returning `{ "success": false, "error": "..." }` for failed tried table additions. Since the address remaining in the new table can't be removed (the address manager interface does not support removing addresses at the moment and adding this seems to be a bigger effort), an error message is returned. This indicates to a user why the RPC failed and allows accounting for the extra address in the new table. This is done in the functional test for the `getrawaddrman` RPC. Fixes #28964 ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 99954f914f031c80aa53daa367fc049c4c55bdf3 stratospher: reACK 99954f9. 🚀 brunoerg: utACK 99954f914f031c80aa53daa367fc049c4c55bdf3 Tree-SHA512: 2f1299410c0582ebc2071271ba789a8abed905f9a510821f77afbcf2a555ec31397578ea55cbcd162fb828be27afedd3246c7b13ad8883f2f745bb8e04364a76
2024-03-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29647: Avoid divide-by-zero in header sync logs when ↵Ava Chow
NodeClock is behind fa4d98b3c8e63f20c6f366fc9382039ba52614a4 Avoid divide-by-zero in header sync logs when NodeClock is behind (MarcoFalke) fa58550317c633c411009c1cc8fb692e3baf97e8 refactor: Modernize header sync logs (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: The log may be confusing, when the NodeClock is behind the current header tip. Fix it, by assuming the NodeClock is never behind the current header tip. ACKs for top commit: sipa: utACK fa4d98b3c8e63f20c6f366fc9382039ba52614a4 sr-gi: tACK [fa4d98b](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29647/commits/fa4d98b3c8e63f20c6f366fc9382039ba52614a4) achow101: ACK fa4d98b3c8e63f20c6f366fc9382039ba52614a4 tdb3: ACK fa4d98b3c8e63f20c6f366fc9382039ba52614a4 Tree-SHA512: 3c5aee4030af387695918c5238012c972ebf850b52e956b5f74590cd7fd4eff0b3e593d411e3eb2a0bb12294af8dc6fbe320f90e4c261399b65a404ff3c3cbd9
2024-03-21refactor: Avoid implicit-integer-sign-change in processNewTransactionMarcoFalke
2024-03-21refactor: Avoid implicit-signed-integer-truncation-or-sign-change in ↵MarcoFalke
FreedesktopImage
2024-03-21refactor: Avoid implicit-integer-sign-change in createTransactionMarcoFalke
2024-03-21node: Use log levels in noui_ThreadSafeMessageBoxTheCharlatan
2024-03-21node: Make translations of fatal errors consistentTheCharlatan
The extra `bilingual_str` argument of the fatal error notifications and `node::AbortNode()` is often unused and when used usually contains the same string as the message argument. It also seems to be confusing, since it is not consistently used for errors requiring user action. For example some assumeutxo fatal errors require the user to do something, but are not translated. So simplify the fatal error and abort node interfaces by only passing a translated string. This slightly changes the fatal errors displayed to the user. Also de-duplicate the abort error log since it is repeated in noui.cpp.
2024-03-21Change Luke Dashjr seed to dashjr-list-of-p2p-nodes.usLuke Dashjr
To avoid issues with DNS blacklisting, I've setup a separate domain for my DNS seed.
2024-03-21cli: improve bitcoin-cli error when not connectedwillcl-ark
Adds a string suggestion `bitcoin-cli -help` as an additional source of information.
2024-03-20Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29671: index: avoid "failed to commit" errors on ↵Ava Chow
initialization f65b0f6401091e4a4ca4c9f4db1cf388f0336bad index: Move last_locator_write_time and logging to end of threadsync loop (Fabian Jahr) Pull request description: In the index sync thread, when initializing an index for the first time, stop callng BaseIndex::Commit when m_best_block_index is null, to avoid a spurious "failed to commit" error from that function. This error started happening in commit https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/7878f97bf15b6e7c9b47d1c0d96419b97e1bdcbd from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25494 and was reported by pstratem in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26903 with an alternate fix. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK f65b0f6401091e4a4ca4c9f4db1cf388f0336bad ryanofsky: Code review ACK f65b0f6401091e4a4ca4c9f4db1cf388f0336bad. Just moved log "Syncing" log line since last commit to avoid having to call now() twice. furszy: ACK f65b0f6401091e4a4ca4c9f4db1cf388f0336bad TheCharlatan: ACK f65b0f6401091e4a4ca4c9f4db1cf388f0336bad Tree-SHA512: afa8f05786318d36346d167ff53ea0b3bc8abdb0ad04465d199dc3eb91e9f837369e24fcb7e24b5757b02d698ec504e61da6ac365eaf006c874fc07a424a7e20
2024-03-20bench: add benchmark for checkblockindexMartin Zumsande
2024-03-20wallet, rpc: Add createwalletdescriptor RPCAva Chow
2024-03-20wallet: Be able to retrieve single key from descriptorsAva Chow
Adds CWallet::GetKey which retrieves a single key from the descriptors stored in the wallet.
2024-03-20wallet: Add GetActiveHDPubKeys to retrieve xpubs from active descriptorsAva Chow
2024-03-20wallet, descspkm: Refactor wallet descriptor generation to standalone funcAndrew Chow
2024-03-20wallet: Refactor function for single DescSPKM setupAndrew Chow
We will need access to a function that sets up a singular DescriptorSPKM, so refactor this out of the multiple DescriptorSPKM setup function.
2024-03-20wallet, rpc: Add gethdkeys RPCAva Chow
gethdkeys retrieves all HD keys stored in the wallet's descriptors.
2024-03-20wallet, rpc: show mempool conflicts in `gettransaction` resultishaanam
2024-03-20wallet: track mempool conflictsishaanam
Behavior changes are: - if a tx has a mempool conflict, the wallet will not attempt to rebroadcast it - if a txo is spent by a mempool-conflicted tx, that txo is no longer considered spent
2024-03-20Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29370: assumeutxo: Get rid of faked nTx and nChainTx ↵Ava Chow
values 9d9a7458a2570f7db56ab626b22010591089c312 assumeutxo: Remove BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID flag (Ryan Ofsky) ef174e9ed21c08f38e5d4b537b6decfd1f646db9 test: assumeutxo snapshot block CheckBlockIndex crash test (Ryan Ofsky) 0391458d767b842a7925785a7053400c0e1cb55a test: assumeutxo stale block CheckBlockIndex crash test (Ryan Ofsky) ef29c8b662309a438121a83f27fd7bdd1779700c assumeutxo: Get rid of faked nTx and nChainTx values (Ryan Ofsky) 9b97d5bbf980d657a277c85d113c2ae3e870e0ec doc: Improve comments describing setBlockIndexCandidates checks (Ryan Ofsky) 0fd915ee6bef63bb360ccc5c039a3c11676c38e3 validation: Check GuessVerificationProgress is not called with disconnected block (Ryan Ofsky) 63e8fc912c21a2f5b47e8eab10fb13c604afed85 ci: add getchaintxstats ubsan suppressions (Ryan Ofsky) f252e687ec94b6ccafb5bc44b7df3daeb473fdea assumeutxo test: Add RPC test for fake nTx and nChainTx values (Ryan Ofsky) Pull request description: The `PopulateAndValidateSnapshot` function introduced in f6e2da5fb7c6406c37612c838c998078ea8d2252 from #19806 has been setting fake `nTx` and `nChainTx` values that can show up in RPC results (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29328) and make `CBlockIndex` state hard to reason about, because it is difficult to know whether the values are real or fake. Revert to previous behavior of setting `nTx` and `nChainTx` to 0 when the values are unknown, instead of faking them. Also drop no-longer needed `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID` flag. Dropping the faked values also fixes assert failures in the `CheckBlockIndex` `(pindex->nChainTx == pindex->nTx + prev_chain_tx)` check that could happen previously if forked or out-of-order blocks before the snapshot got submitted while the snapshot was being validated. The PR includes two commits adding tests for these failures and describing them in detail. Compatibility note: This change could cause new `-checkblockindex` failures if a snapshot was loaded by a previous version of Bitcoin Core and not fully validated, because fake `nTx` values will have been saved to the block index. It would be pretty easy to avoid these failures by adding some compatibility code to `LoadBlockIndex` and changing `nTx` values from 1 to 0 when they are fake (when `(pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_VALID_MASK) < BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS`), but a little simpler not to worry about being compatible in this case. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-ACK 9d9a7458a2570f7db56ab626b22010591089c312 achow101: ACK 9d9a7458a2570f7db56ab626b22010591089c312 mzumsande: Tested ACK 9d9a7458a2570f7db56ab626b22010591089c312 maflcko: ACK 9d9a7458a2570f7db56ab626b22010591089c312 🎯 Tree-SHA512: b1e1e2731ec36be30d5f5914042517219378fc31486674030c29d9c7488ed83fb60ba7095600f469dc32f0d8ba79c49ff7706303006507654e1762f26ee416e0
2024-03-20Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27039: blockstorage: do not flush block to disk if it ↵Ava Chow
is already there dfcef536d0e6c40e98dce35ae7af6e3e4a2595cd blockstorage: do not flush block to disk if it is already there (Matthew Zipkin) Pull request description: Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/2039 When reindexing from flat-file block storage there is no need to write anything back to disk, since the block data is already there. This PR skips flushing to disk those blocks that already have a known position in the datastore. Skipping this means that users can write-protect the `blk` files on disk which may be useful for security or even safely sharing that data between multiple bitcoind instances. `FindBlockPos()` may also flush the undo data file, but again this is skipped if the corresponding block position is known, like during the initial stage of a reindex when block data is being indexed. Once the block index is complete the validation mechanism will call `ConnectBlock()` which will save undo data at that time. The call stack looks like this: ``` init() ThreadImport() <-- process fReindex flag LoadExternalBlockFile() AcceptBlock() SaveBlockToDisk() FindBlockPos() FlushBlockFile() <-- unnecessary if block is already on disk ``` A larger refactor of this part of the code was started by mzumsande here: https://github.com/mzumsande/bitcoin/tree/202207_refactor_findblockpos including this fix, reviewers can let me know if the changes should be combined. ACKs for top commit: sipa: utACK dfcef536d0e6c40e98dce35ae7af6e3e4a2595cd mzumsande: re-ACK dfcef536d0e6c40e98dce35ae7af6e3e4a2595cd achow101: ACK dfcef536d0e6c40e98dce35ae7af6e3e4a2595cd furszy: Rebase diff ACK dfcef53. Tree-SHA512: 385c5ac1288b325135398d0ddd3ab788fa98cc0ca19bd2474c74039f2ce70d5088c1d1c9d4dd10aefcbd4c757767ec5805d07ba8cee9289a66f96e6f9eaa5279
2024-03-20Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28955: index: block filters sync, reduce disk read ↵Ava Chow
operations by caching last header 99afb9d15a08d2f46739f4d2b66c63dbabd7a44e refactor: init, simplify index shutdown code (furszy) 0faafb57f8298547949cbc0044ee9e925ed887ba index: decrease ThreadSync cs_main contention (furszy) f1469eb45469672046c5793b44863f606736c853 index: cache last block filter header (furszy) a6756ecdb2f1ac960433412807aa377d1ee80d05 index: blockfilter, decouple header lookup into its own function (furszy) 331f044e3b49223cedd16803d123c0da9d91d6a2 index: blockfilter, decouple Write into its own function (furszy) bcbd7eb8d40fbbd0e58c61acef087d65f2047036 bench: basic block filter index initial sync (furszy) Pull request description: Work decoupled from #26966 per request. The aim is to remove an unnecessary disk read operation that currently takes place with every new arriving block (or scanned block during background sync). Instead of reading the last filter header from disk merely to access its hash for constructing the next filter, this work caches it, occupying just 32 more bytes in memory. Also, reduces `cs_main` lock contention during the index initial sync process. And, simplifies the indexes initialization and shutdown procedure. Testing Note: To compare the changes, added a pretty basic benchmark in the second commit. Alternatively, could also test the changes by timing the block filter sync from scratch on any network; start the node with `-blockfilterindex` and monitor the logs until the syncing process finish. Local Benchmark Results: *Master (c252a0fc0f4dc7d262b971a5e7ff01508159193b): | ns/op | op/s | err% | total | benchmark |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:---------- | 132,042,516.60 | 7.57 | 0.3% | 7.79 | `BlockFilterIndexSync` *PR (43a212cfdac6c64e82b601c664443d022f191520): | ns/op | op/s | err% | total | benchmark |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:---------- | 126,915,841.60 | 7.88 | 0.6% | 7.51 | `BlockFilterIndexSync` ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-ACK 99afb9d15a08d2f46739f4d2b66c63dbabd7a44e achow101: ACK 99afb9d15a08d2f46739f4d2b66c63dbabd7a44e TheCharlatan: Re-ACK 99afb9d15a08d2f46739f4d2b66c63dbabd7a44e andrewtoth: ACK 99afb9d15a08d2f46739f4d2b66c63dbabd7a44e Tree-SHA512: 927daadd68f4ee1ca781a89519539b895f5185a76ebaf525fbc246ea8dcf40d44a82def00ac34b188640802844b312270067f1b33e65a2479e06be9169c616de
2024-03-19index: Move last_locator_write_time and logging to end of threadsync loopFabian Jahr
This avoids having commit print a needless error message during init. Co-authored-by: furszy <mfurszy@protonmail.com>
2024-03-19Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29192: Weaken serfloat testsfanquake
6e873df3478f3ab8f67d1b9339c7e990ae90e95b serfloat: improve/simplify tests (Pieter Wuille) b45f1f56582fb3a0d17db5014ac57f1fb40a3611 serfloat: do not test encode(bits)=bits anymore (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: Closes #28941. Our current tests for serfloat verify two distinct properties: 1. Whether they roundtrip `double`->`uint64_t`->`double` (excluding NaN values) on all systems. 2. Whether on systems with a typical floating point unit that encoding matches the hardware representation, as before v22.0, we would dump the hardware representation directly to disk and we wanted to retain compatibility with that. #28941 seems to show that the second property doesn't always hold, but just for "subnormal" numbers (below $2^{-1021}$). Since we don't care about encoding these numbers, we could exclude such subnormal numbers from the hardware-identical representation test, but this PR goes further and just drops the second property entirely, as I don't think we care about edge-case compatibility with pre-v22.0 code for fee_estimates.dat (the only place it is used). ACKs for top commit: glozow: ACK 6e873df3478f3ab8f67d1b9339c7e990ae90e95b fanquake: ACK 6e873df3478f3ab8f67d1b9339c7e990ae90e95b - It's not as much of a priority, but I think we could still backport this. Tree-SHA512: e18ceee0753a7ee7e999fdfa10b014dc5bb67b6ef79522a0f8c76b889adcfa785772fc26ed7559bcb5a09a9938e243bb54eedd9549bc59080a2c8090155e2267
2024-03-19rpc: "addpeeraddress tried" return error on failure0xb10c
When trying to add an address to the IP address manager tried table, it's first added to the new table and then moved to the tried table. Previously, adding a conflicting address to the address manager's tried table with test-only `addpeeraddress tried=true` RPC would return `{ "success": true }`. However, the address would not be added to the tried table, but would remain in the new table. This caused, e.g., issue 28964. This is fixed by returning `{ "success": false, "error": "failed-adding-to-tried" }` for failed tried table additions. Since the address remaining in the new table can't be removed (the address manager interface does not support removing addresses at the moment and adding this seems to be a bigger effort), an error message is returned. This indicates to a user why the RPC failed and allows accounting for the extra address in the new table. Also: To check the number of addresses in each addrman table, the addrman checks were re-run and the log output of this check was asserted. Ideally, logs shouldn't be used as an interface in automated tests. To avoid asserting the logs, use the getaddrmaninfo and getrawaddrman RPCs (which weren't implemented when the test was added). Removing the "getnodeaddress" calls would also remove the addrman checks from the test, which could reduce the test coverage. To avoid this, these are kept.
2024-03-19Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29667: fuzz: actually test garbage >64b in p2p ↵fanquake
transport test 626f8e398e219b84907ccaad036f69177d39284c fuzz: actually test garbage >64b in p2p transport test (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: This fixes an oversight from #28196: in the `p2p_transport_bidirectional_v2` fuzz test, when the desired garbage length is over 64 bytes, the code would actually use garbage length 0. Fix this. ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29667/commits/626f8e398e219b84907ccaad036f69177d39284c brunoerg: crACK 626f8e398e219b84907ccaad036f69177d39284c Tree-SHA512: f6346367adb10464b6c9d20aef43625531d2a4d8110887ad03214b8c1907b83560f2dd5b5415e2180a40b4cd276d51881b32b60c740471b5c6bb218aa19848d8
2024-03-18Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28950: RPC: Add maxfeerate and maxburnamount args to ↵glozow
submitpackage 38f70ba6ac86fb96c60571d2e1f316315c1c73cc RPC: Add maxfeerate and maxburnamount args to submitpackage (Greg Sanders) Pull request description: Resolves https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28949 I couldn't manage to do it very cleanly outside of (sub)package evaluation itself, since it would change the current interface very heavily. Instead I threaded through the max fee argument and used that directly via ATMPArgs. From that perspective, this is somewhat a reversion from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19339. In a post-cluster mempool world, these checks could be consolidated to right after the given (ancestor) package is linearized/chunked, by just checking the feerate of the top chunk and rejecting the submission entirely if the top chunk is too high. The implication here is that subpackages can be submitted to the mempool prior to hitting this new fee-based error condition. ACKs for top commit: ismaelsadeeq: Re-ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/38f70ba6ac86fb96c60571d2e1f316315c1c73cc 👍🏾 glozow: ACK 38f70ba6ac with some non-blocking nits murchandamus: LGTM, code review ACK 38f70ba6ac86fb96c60571d2e1f316315c1c73cc Tree-SHA512: 38212aa9de25730944cee58b0806a3d37097e42719af8dd7de91ce86bb5d9770b6f7c37354bf418bd8ba571c52947da1dcdbb968bf429dd1dbdf8715315af18f
2024-03-18remove libbitcoinconsensusfanquake
This was deprecated in v27.0, for removal in v28.0. See discussion in PR #29189.
2024-03-18assumeutxo: Remove BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID flagRyan Ofsky
Flag adds complexity and is not currently used for anything.
2024-03-18assumeutxo: Get rid of faked nTx and nChainTx valuesRyan Ofsky
The `PopulateAndValidateSnapshot` function introduced in f6e2da5fb7c6406c37612c838c998078ea8d2252 from #19806 has been setting fake `nTx` and `nChainTx` values that can show up in RPC results (see #29328) and make `CBlockIndex` state hard to reason about, because it is difficult to know whether the values are real or fake. Revert to previous behavior of setting `nTx` and `nChainTx` to 0 when the values are unknown, instead of faking them. This commit fixes at least two assert failures in the (pindex->nChainTx == pindex->nTx + prev_chain_tx) check that would happen previously. Tests for these failures are added separately in the next two commits. Compatibility note: This change could result in -checkblockindex failures if a snapshot was loaded by a previous version of Bitcoin Core and not fully validated, because fake nTx values will have been saved to the block index. It would be pretty easy to avoid these failures by adding some compatibility code to `LoadBlockIndex` and changing `nTx` values from 1 to 0 when they are fake (when `(pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_VALID_MASK) < BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS`), but a little simpler not to worry about being compatible in this case.
2024-03-18doc: Improve comments describing setBlockIndexCandidates checksRyan Ofsky
The checks are changing slightly in the next commit, so try to explains the ones that exist to avoid confusion (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29370#discussion_r1499519079)
2024-03-18validation: Check GuessVerificationProgress is not called with disconnected ↵Ryan Ofsky
block Use Assume macro as suggested https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29370#discussion_r1479427801
2024-03-18wallet: Add IsActiveScriptPubKeyManAva Chow
Given a ScriptPubKeyMan, it's useful to ask the wallet whether it is currently active.
2024-03-18desc spkm: Add functions to retrieve specific private keysAva Chow
2024-03-18Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29659: ci: Bump `TIDY_LLVM_V`fanquake
636c9862cfc8b3facc84eb62b51e18877f2022a9 ci: Bump `TIDY_LLVM_V` (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: This PR switches to the latest [IWYU 0.22](https://github.com/include-what-you-use/include-what-you-use/releases/tag/0.22), which is compatible with Clang 18. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 636c9862cfc8b3facc84eb62b51e18877f2022a9 Tree-SHA512: 78ce89244c5e487dd1be8b4bd2ca6f06d19b04b78289ebc21985110574053545dcce5eb622edf2bede2cf7bb58360170e976d30a4484a127d34dd17b1c604e9c
2024-03-18refactor: FormatISO8601* without gmtime*MarcoFalke
2024-03-18Revert "time: add runtime sanity check"MarcoFalke
This reverts commit 3c2e16be22ae04bf56663ee5ec1554d0d569741b.
2024-03-18Unit tests for CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBFGreg Sanders
2024-03-18test: unit test for ImprovesFeerateDiagramGreg Sanders
2024-03-18Add fuzz test for FeeFracGreg Sanders
2024-03-18fuzz: fuzz diagram creation and comparisonGreg Sanders
Co-authored-by: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@chaincode.com> Co-authored-by: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
2024-03-18test: Add tests for CompareFeerateDiagram and CheckConflictTopologyGreg Sanders
2024-03-18fuzz: Add fuzz target for ImprovesFeerateDiagramGreg Sanders
Co-authored-by: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@chaincode.com>
2024-03-18Implement ImprovesFeerateDiagramGreg Sanders
This new function takes the populated sets of direct and all conflicts computed in the current mempool, assuming the replacements are a single chunk, and computes a diagram check. The diagram check only works against cluster sizes of 2 or less, and fails if it encounters a different topology. Co-authored-by: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@chaincode.com>
2024-03-18Add FeeFrac unit testsGreg Sanders
Co-authored-by: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@chaincode.com>
2024-03-18Add FeeFrac utilsGreg Sanders
Co-authored-by: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@chaincode.com> Co-authored-by: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
2024-03-17fuzz: actually test garbage >64b in p2p transport testPieter Wuille
2024-03-15wallet refactor: use CWalletTx member functions to determine tx stateishaanam
2024-03-15ci: Bump `TIDY_LLVM_V`Hennadii Stepanov
This change switches to the latest IWYU 0.22, which is compatible with Clang 18.
2024-03-15Bugfix: GUI: Help messages already have a trailing newline, so don't add an ↵Luke Dashjr
extra one