aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-05-14crypto: add NUMS_H constjosibake
2024-05-13wallet: implement BerkeleyRODatabase::BackupAva Chow
2024-05-13wallet: implement BerkeleyROBatchAva Chow
Implement ReadKey and HasKey of BerkeleyROBatch, and Next of BerkeleyROCursor. Also adds the containers for records to BerkeleyRODatabase so that BerkeleyROBatch will be able to access the records.
2024-05-13wallet: add dummy BerkeleyRODatabase and BerkeleyROBatch classesAva Chow
BerkeleyRODatabase and BerkeleyROBatch will be used to access a BDB file without the use of BDB. For now, these are dummy classes.
2024-05-13refactor: simplify `FormatSubVersion` using strprintf/JoinSebastian Falbesoner
Rather than using std::ostringstream and manually joining the comments, use strprintf and our own `Join` helper.
2024-05-13Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28233: validation: don't clear cache on periodic ↵Ava Chow
flush: >2x block connection speed 4a6d1d1e3bc3d559cd13d134b4b827f22635ac4b validation: don't clear cache on periodic flush (Andrew Toth) Pull request description: Since https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17487 we no longer need to clear the coins cache when syncing to disk. A warm coins cache significantly speeds up block connection, and only needs to be fully flushed when nearing the `dbcache` limit. Periodic flushes occur every 24 hours, which empties the cache and causes block connection to slow down. By keeping the cache through periodic flushes a node can run for several days with an increasingly hotter cache and connect blocks much more quickly. Now not only can setting a higher `dbcache` value be beneficial for IBD, it can also be beneficial for connecting blocks faster. To benchmark in real world usage, I spun up 6 identical `t2.small` AWS EC2 instances, all running in the same region in the same VPC. I configured 2 instances to run master, 2 instances to run the change in this PR, and 2 instances to run the change in this PR but with `dbcache=1000`. All instances had `prune=5000` and a 20 GB `gp2` `EBS` volume. A 7th EC2 instance in the same VPC ran master and connected only to some trusted nodes in the outside network. Each of the 6 nodes under test only connected directly to this 7th instance. I manually pruned as much as possible and uploaded the same `blocks`, `chainstate` and `mempool.dat` to all instances. I started all 6 peers simultaneously at block height `835245` and ran them for over a week until block `836534`. The results were much faster block connection times for this branch compared to master, and much faster for this branch with `dbcache=1000` compared to default `dbcache`. | branch |speed | |-----------:|----------:| | master 1 | 1995.49ms/blk | | master 2 | 2129.78ms/blk | | branch default dbcache 1 | 1189.65ms/blk | | branch default dbcache 2 | 1037.74ms/blk | | branch dbcache=1000 1 | 393.69ms/blk | | branch dbcache=1000 2 | 427.77ms/blk | The log files of all 6 instances are [here](https://gist.github.com/andrewtoth/03c95033e7581d5dbc5be028639a1a91). There is a lot of noise with the exact times of blocks being connected, so I plotted the rolling 20 block connect time averages. The large dots are the times where the cache is emptied. For the red master nodes, this happens every 24 hours. The blue branch nodes with default `dbcache` only filled up and emptied the caches once, which is seen in the middle. The green branch nodes with 1000 `dbcache` never emptied the cache. It is very clear from the chart that whenever the cache is emptied, connect block speed degrades significantly. ![plot](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/assets/237213/802cb28d-1ad4-47c3-a886-c5366b423eca) Also note that this still clears the cache for pruning flushes. Having frequent pruning flushes with a large cache that doesn't clear is less performant than the status quo https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15265#issuecomment-458657451. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28280. ACKs for top commit: sipa: utACK 4a6d1d1e3bc3d559cd13d134b4b827f22635ac4b achow101: ACK 4a6d1d1e3bc3d559cd13d134b4b827f22635ac4b brunoerg: crACK 4a6d1d1e3bc3d559cd13d134b4b827f22635ac4b Tree-SHA512: 05dbc677bc309bbcf89c52a6c5e853e2816b0ef0b5ee3719b30696df315a0427e244bb82da9ad828ec0e7ea8764552f8affe14c0184b52adf1909f5d8c1b4f9e
2024-05-13Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30094: rpc: move UniValue in blockToJSONRyan Ofsky
b77bad309e92f176f340598eec056eb7bff86f5f rpc: move UniValue in blockToJSON (willcl-ark) Pull request description: Fixes: #24542 Fixes: #30052 Without explicitly declaring the move, these `UniValues` get copied, causing increased memory usage. Fix this by explicitly moving the `UniValue` objects. Used by `rest_block` and `getblock` RPC. ACKs for top commit: maflcko: review ACK b77bad309e92f176f340598eec056eb7bff86f5f ismaelsadeeq: ACK b77bad309e92f176f340598eec056eb7bff86f5f TheCharlatan: ACK b77bad309e92f176f340598eec056eb7bff86f5f theuni: utACK b77bad309e92f176f340598eec056eb7bff86f5f hebasto: ACK b77bad309e92f176f340598eec056eb7bff86f5f, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK. BrandonOdiwuor: ACK b77bad309e92f176f340598eec056eb7bff86f5f Tree-SHA512: 767608331040f9cfe5c3568ed0e3c338920633472a1a50d4bbb47d1dc69d2bb11466d611f050ac8ad1a894b47fe1ea4d968cf34cbd44d4bb8d479fc5c7475f6d
2024-05-13cli: Add warning for duplicate port definitiontdb3
Adds a warning when both -rpcconnect and -rpcport define a port to be used.
2024-05-13cli: Sanitize ports in rpcconnect and rpcporttdb3
Adds error handling of invalid ports to rpcconnect and rpcport, with associated functional tests.
2024-05-13Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29974: fuzz: txorphan tests fixupsglozow
58594c7040241f2312b0b8735a8baf0412674613 fuzz: txorphan tests fixups (Sergi Delgado Segura) Pull request description: Motivated by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28970#discussion_r1576401327 Adds the following fixups in txorphan fuzz tests: - Don't bond the output count of the created orphans to the number of available coins - Allow duplicate inputs but don't store duplicate outpoints Most significantly, this gets rid of the `duplicate_input` flag altogether, making the test easier to reason about. Notice how, under normal conditions, duplicate inputs would be caught by `MemPoolAccept::PreChecks`, however, no validations checks are run on the test before adding data to the orphanage (neither were they before this patch) ## Rationale The way the test is currently written, duplicate inputs are allowed based on a random flag (`duplicate_input`). If the flag is unset, upon selecting an outpoint as input for a new transaction, the input is popped to prevent re-selection and later re-added to the collection (once all inputs have been picked). However, the re-addition to the collection is performed independently of whether the flag was set or not. This means that, if the flag is set, the selected inputs are duplicated which in turn makes these inputs more likely to be re-picked in the following iteration of the loop. Additionally, both the input and output count of the transaction are bonded to the number of available outpoints. This makes sense for the former, but the latter shouldn't be. ACKs for top commit: maflcko: utACK 58594c7040241f2312b0b8735a8baf0412674613 glozow: ACK 58594c7 instagibbs: ACK 58594c7040241f2312b0b8735a8baf0412674613 Tree-SHA512: e97cc2a43e388f87b64d2e4e45f929dd5b0dd85d668dd693b75e4c9ceea734cd7645952385d428208d07b70e1aafbec84cc2ec264a2e07d36fc8ba3e97885a8d
2024-05-13Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29994: doc: removed help text saying that peers may ↵glozow
not connect automatically 95897ff181c0757e445f0e066a2a590a0a0120d2 doc: removed help text saying that peers may not connect automatically (kevkevin) Pull request description: Introduced in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23542 and released in version 23.0 there has been significant time since this change (2 years). This should be removed as it is no longer relevant ACKs for top commit: stickies-v: ACK 95897ff181c0757e445f0e066a2a590a0a0120d2 tdb3: ACK for 95897ff181c0757e445f0e066a2a590a0a0120d2. vasild: ACK 95897ff181c0757e445f0e066a2a590a0a0120d2 jonatack: ACK 95897ff181c0757e445f0e066a2a590a0a0120d2 kristapsk: ACK 95897ff181c0757e445f0e066a2a590a0a0120d2. According to https://bitnodes.io/dashboard/#user-agents stats, most nodes on the network are v23+. Tree-SHA512: 9e35194f8a1e06f1447450af2ea30cdc43722665c2d2e4b7aa9a52afac5c1e83fed744742c836743a555cc180c90f9eebdc6637eba6190010d693eef9c5834f7
2024-05-13rpc: move UniValue in blockToJSONwillcl-ark
Without explicitly declaring the move, these UniValues get copied, causing increased memory usage. Fix this by explicitly moving the UniValue objects. Used by `rest_block` and `getblock` RPC.
2024-05-13refactor: Model the bech32 charlimit as an Enumjosibake
Bech32(m) was defined with a 90 character limit so that certain guarantees for error detection could be made for segwit addresses. However, there is nothing about the encoding scheme itself that requires a limit and in practice bech32(m) has been used without the 90 char limit (e.g. lightning invoices). Further, increasing the character limit doesn't do away with error detection, it simply lessons the guarantees. Model charlimit as an Enum, so that if a different address scheme is using bech32(m), the character limit for that address scheme can be used, rather than always using the 90 charlimit defined for segwit addresses. upate comment
2024-05-12script/sign: avoid duplicated signature verification after signingSebastian Falbesoner
`ProduceSignature` already calls `VerifyScript` internally as last step in order to check whether the signature data is complete. If and only if that is the case, the `complete` field of the `SignatureData` is set accordingly and there is no need then to verify the script after again, as we already know that it would succeed. This leads to a rough ~20% speed-up for `SignTransaction` for single-input ECDSA or Taproot inputs, according to the `SignTransaction{ECDSA,Taproot}` benchmarks.
2024-05-12bench: add benchmark for `SignTransaction`Sebastian Falbesoner
2024-05-12Merge bitcoin-core/gui#812: Fix create unsigned transaction fee bumpmerge-script
671b7a32516d62e1e79393ded4b45910bd08010a gui: fix create unsigned transaction fee bump (furszy) Pull request description: Fixes #810. Not much to explain; we were requiring the wallet to be unlocked for the unsigned transaction creation process. Fix this by moving the unlock wallet request to the signed transaction creation process. ACKs for top commit: pablomartin4btc: tACK 671b7a32516d62e1e79393ded4b45910bd08010a hebasto: ACK 671b7a32516d62e1e79393ded4b45910bd08010a, tested on Ubuntu 24.04. Tree-SHA512: 5b9ec5a1b91c014c05c83c63daaa8ba33f9dc1bfa930442315a0913db710df17a1b6bb4ad39f1419a7054f37ebedb7ad52e1c5d3d2fb444b1676162e89a4efd2
2024-05-12Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29658: Bugfix: GUI: Help messages already have a ↵merge-script
trailing newline, so don't add an extra one d1ed09a7643b567e021b2ecb756bc925c48fc708 Bugfix: GUI: Help messages already have a trailing newline, so don't add an extra one (Luke Dashjr) Pull request description: Reviewing #29585, I noticed that `bitcoin-qt` adds an extra newline for `-help` and `-version` beyond the other binaries'. ACKs for top commit: hebasto: ACK d1ed09a7643b567e021b2ecb756bc925c48fc708, tested on Ubuntu 24.04. Tree-SHA512: 15ee9d1060c2492bb3b04a0ac4cb53f7b959bbe32bce415793da0c221f1c963c8f2bb3996ea07d1a7c192bfc2e23be2cd7d4e5649c592eb3fc03906c2763f1aa
2024-05-11Merge bitcoin-core/gui#813: Don't permit port in proxy IP optionmerge-script
10c5275ba4532fb1bf54057d2f61fc35b51f1e85 gui: don't permit port in proxy IP option (willcl-ark) Pull request description: Fixes: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/809 Previously it was possible through the GUI to enter an IP address:port into the "Proxy IP" configuration box. After the node was restarted the errant setting would prevent the node starting back up until manually removed from settings.json. Prevent this with a simple check for ":" in the string. This is acceptable here in the GUI setting because we already fail on a hostname such as "http://x.x.x.x", so it won't cause false positives. ACKs for top commit: furszy: utACK 10c5275ba45 hebasto: ACK 10c5275ba4532fb1bf54057d2f61fc35b51f1e85, tested on Ubuntu 24.04. Tree-SHA512: ed83590630cf693680a3221f701ecd18dd08710a17b726dc4978a3a6e330a34fb77d73a4f710c01bcb3faf88b6604ff37bcdbb191ce1623348ca5b92fd6fe9a7
2024-05-11Merge bitcoin-core/gui#788: debugwindow: update session ID tooltipmerge-script
3bf00e13609eefa6ddb11353519bb1aec2342513 gui: debugwindow: update session ID tooltip (Marnix) Pull request description: When you have a v2 connection, there is always a session ID. the _if any_ is a leftover from https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/754, where the session ID property initially would always be displayed (transport v1 and v2). So the session ID could be empty when you have a v1 connection. As now the _Session ID_ property only is displayed for v2 connection, there will always be a session ID. master ![sessionIDifany](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/assets/93143998/d4d7df43-8281-4b1e-83fc-5a3788d7724e) PR ![sessionID](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/assets/93143998/221f6831-7d12-4913-be76-325a87baad2e) Session ID not shown when transport v1 ![transportv1](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/assets/93143998/6c067a08-4be4-4ce1-b514-80654ca5cd43) <!-- *** Please remove the following help text before submitting: *** Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed immediately. GUI-related pull requests should be opened against https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui first. See CONTRIBUTING.md --> <!-- Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience significantly: * Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome. * All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests should accompany the change. * Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug was fixed. * Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues. If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible. * Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example, most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code changes are usually rejected. --> <!-- Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so patches often sit for a long time. --> ACKs for top commit: vostrnad: ACK 3bf00e13609eefa6ddb11353519bb1aec2342513 kristapsk: ACK 3bf00e13609eefa6ddb11353519bb1aec2342513 jarolrod: ACK 3bf00e13609eefa6ddb11353519bb1aec2342513 pablomartin4btc: tACK 3bf00e13609eefa6ddb11353519bb1aec2342513 hebasto: ACK 3bf00e13609eefa6ddb11353519bb1aec2342513. Tree-SHA512: 4de0c56c070dc5d1cee73b629bdf3d1778c6d90d512337aa6cfd3eed4ce95cbcfbe5713e2942f6fc22907b2c4d9df7979ba8e9f91f7cc173b42699ea35113f96
2024-05-11Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30081: refactor: Remove unused code from ↵merge-script
`subprocess.h` header 5a11d3023f7d0cde777f3496c0f3aa381823d749 refactor, subprocess: Remove unused stream API calls (Hennadii Stepanov) 05b6f8793c6d5f17d1cb413e2884f1fb0f367ad8 refactor, subprocess: Remove unused `Popen::child_created_` data member (Hennadii Stepanov) 9e1ccf55e178144804e30cfe94757b6da2a6ca28 refactor, subprocess: Remove unused `Popen::poll()` (Hennadii Stepanov) 24b53fc84af301fff592e06723b980e29aa68289 refactor, subprocess: Remove `Popen::pid()` (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: This PR continues https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29961. Please note that `Popen::poll()` is not required for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29868 anymore. ACKs for top commit: theuni: Easy code review ACK 5a11d3023f7d0cde777f3496c0f3aa381823d749 since it's all removals :) theStack: Code-review ACK 5a11d3023f7d0cde777f3496c0f3aa381823d749 Tree-SHA512: 11f984f8384c337782d058afa80011e88087a1b5a3ed6e4678d492e6c232b706a26312463c5dd8c529aa477497c8afca9f54574e0e36e3edd5675bd5d8424bbb
2024-05-10test: add GetAddedNodeInfo() CJDNS regression unit testJon Atack
2024-05-10p2p, bugfix: detect addnode cjdns peers in GetAddedNodeInfo()Jon Atack
Addnode (manual) peers connected to us via the cjdns network are currently not detected by CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo(), i.e. fConnected is always false. This causes the following issues: - RPC `getaddednodeinfo` incorrectly shows them as not connected - CConnman::ThreadOpenAddedConnections() continually retries to connect them
2024-05-10Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29252: kernel: Remove key module from kernel libraryAva Chow
96378fe734e5fb6167eb20036d7170572a647edb Refactor: Remove ECC_Start and ECC_Stop from key header (TheCharlatan) 41eba5bd716bea47c8731d156d053afee92a7f12 kernel: Remove key module from kernel library (TheCharlatan) a08d2b3cb971c68e9a50b991b2953fa4541cf48a tools: Use ECC_Context helper in bitcoin-tx and bitcoin-wallet tools (Ryan Ofsky) 28905c1a64a87a56f16aea8a4d23dea7eec9ca59 test: Use ECC_Context helper in bench and fuzz tests (Ryan Ofsky) 538fedde1d9c96a2bbe06cacc0cd6903135fbc83 common: Add ECC_Context RAII wrapper for ECC_Start/ECC_Stop (Ryan Ofsky) Pull request description: The key module's functionality is not used by the kernel library, but currently kernel users are still required to initialize the key module's `secp256k1_context_sign` global as part of the `kernel::Context` through `ECC_Start`. So move the `ECC_Start` call to the `NodeContext` ctor instead to completely remove the key module from the kernel library. The gui tests currently keep multiple `NodeContext` objects in memory, so call `ECC_Stop` manually to avoid triggering an assertion on `ECC_Start`. --- This PR is part of the [libbitcoinkernel project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587). It removes a module from the kernel library. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 96378fe734e5fb6167eb20036d7170572a647edb ryanofsky: Code review ACK 96378fe734e5fb6167eb20036d7170572a647edb. Just suggested comment changes since last review. theuni: utACK 96378fe734e5fb6167eb20036d7170572a647edb Tree-SHA512: 40be427e8e2c920c0e3ce64a9bdd90551be27a89af11440bfb6ab0dd3a1d1ccb7cf1f82383cd782818cd1bb44d5ae5d2161cf4d78d3127ce4987342007090bab
2024-05-10refactor, subprocess: Remove unused stream API callsHennadii Stepanov
2024-05-10refactor, subprocess: Remove unused `Popen::child_created_` data memberHennadii Stepanov
2024-05-10refactor, subprocess: Remove unused `Popen::poll()`Hennadii Stepanov
2024-05-10refactor, subprocess: Remove `Popen::pid()`Hennadii Stepanov
2024-05-09Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29122: test: adds outbound eviction functional tests, ↵Ava Chow
updates comment in ConsiderEviction d53d84834747c37f4060a9ef379e0a6b50155246 test: adds outbound eviction tests for non outbound-full-relay peers (Sergi Delgado Segura) a8d9a0edc7cef2c31a557ef53eb45520976b0d65 test: adds outbound eviction functional tests, updates comment in ConsiderEviction (Sergi Delgado Segura) Pull request description: ## Motivation While checking the outbound eviction code I realized a case was not considered within the comments, which in turn made me realize we had no functional tests for the outbound eviction case (when I went to check/add the test case). This PR updates the aforementioned comment and adds functional tests to cover the outbound eviction logic, in addition to the existing unit tests found at `src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp`. ACKs for top commit: davidgumberg: reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/d53d84834747c37f4060a9ef379e0a6b50155246 tdb3: Re ACK for d53d84834747c37f4060a9ef379e0a6b50155246 achow101: ACK d53d84834747c37f4060a9ef379e0a6b50155246 cbergqvist: ACK d53d84834747c37f4060a9ef379e0a6b50155246 Tree-SHA512: 633b84bb1229fe21e2f650c1beada33ca7f190b64eafd64df2266516d21175e5d652e019ff7114f00cb8bd19f5817dc19e65adf75767a88e24dc0842ce40c63e
2024-05-09Refactor: Remove ECC_Start and ECC_Stop from key headerTheCharlatan
They are unused outside of the key module now.
2024-05-09kernel: Remove key module from kernel libraryTheCharlatan
The key module's functionality is not used by the kernel library, but currently kernel users are still required to initialize the key module's `secp256k1_context_sign` global as part of the `kernel::Context` through `ECC_Start`.
2024-05-09tools: Use ECC_Context helper in bitcoin-tx and bitcoin-wallet toolsRyan Ofsky
2024-05-09test: Use ECC_Context helper in bench and fuzz testsRyan Ofsky
2024-05-09common: Add ECC_Context RAII wrapper for ECC_Start/ECC_StopRyan Ofsky
2024-05-08Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29292: rpc: improve submitpackage documentation and ↵Ava Chow
other improvements 78e52f663f3e3ac86260b913dad777fd7218f210 doc: rpc: fix submitpackage examples (stickies-v) 1a875d4049574730d4a53a1b68bd29b80ad96d38 rpc: update min package size error message in submitpackage (stickies-v) f9ece258aa868d0776caa86b94e71ba05a9b287e doc: rpc: submitpackage takes sorted array (stickies-v) 17f74512f0d19cb452ed79a4bff5a222fcdb53c4 test: add bounds checking for submitpackage RPC (stickies-v) Pull request description: `submitpackage` requires the package to be topologically sorted with the child being the last element in the array, but this is not documented in the RPC method or the error messages. Also sneaking in some other minor improvements that I found while going through the code: - Informing the user that `package` needs to be an array of length between `1` and `MAX_PACKAGE_COUNT` is confusing when `IsChildWithPackage()` requires that the package size >= 2. Remove this check to avoid code duplication and sending a confusing error message. - fixups to the `submitpackage` examples ACKs for top commit: fjahr: re-ACK 78e52f663f3e3ac86260b913dad777fd7218f210 instagibbs: ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29292/commits/78e52f663f3e3ac86260b913dad777fd7218f210 achow101: ACK 78e52f663f3e3ac86260b913dad777fd7218f210 glozow: utACK 78e52f663f3e3ac86260b913dad777fd7218f210 Tree-SHA512: a8845621bb1cbf784167fc7c82cb8ceb105868b65b26d3465f072d1c04ef3699e85a21a524ade805d423bcecbc34f7d5bff12f2c21cbd902ae1fb154193ebdc9
2024-05-08blockstorage: Add Assume for fKnown / snapshot chainstateMartin Zumsande
fKnown is true during reindex (and only then), which deletes any existing snapshot chainstate. As a result, this function can never be called wth fKnown set and a snapshot chainstate. Add an Assume for this, and make the code initializing a blockfile cursor for the snapshot conditional on !fKnown. This is a preparation for splitting the reindex logic out of FindBlockPos in the following commits.
2024-05-08Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26326: net: don't lock cs_main while reading blocks in ↵Ava Chow
net processing 75d27fefc7a04ebdda7be5724a014b6a896e7325 net: reduce LOCK(cs_main) scope in ProcessGetBlockData (Andrew Toth) 613a45cd4b5482aedbdc7c61c839ea05996935c6 net: reduce LOCK(cs_main) scope in GETBLOCKTXN (Andrew Toth) Pull request description: Inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11913 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26308. `cs_main` doesn't need to be locked while reading blocks. This removes the locks in `net_processing`. ACKs for top commit: sr-gi: ACK [75d27fe](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26326/commits/75d27fefc7a04ebdda7be5724a014b6a896e7325) achow101: ACK 75d27fefc7a04ebdda7be5724a014b6a896e7325 furszy: ACK 75d27fefc with a non-blocking nit. mzumsande: Code Review ACK 75d27fefc7a04ebdda7be5724a014b6a896e7325 TheCharlatan: ACK 75d27fefc7a04ebdda7be5724a014b6a896e7325 Tree-SHA512: 79b85f748f68ecfb2f2afd3267857dd41b8e76dd482c9c922037399dcbce7b1e5d4c708a4f5fd17c3fb6699b0d88f26a17cc1d92db115dd43c8d4392ae27cec4
2024-05-08Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28336: rpc: parse legacy pubkeys consistently with ↵Ava Chow
specific error messages 98570fe29bb08d7edc48011aa6b9731c6ab4ed2e test: add coverage for parsing cryptographically invalid pubkeys (Sebastian Falbesoner) c740b154d193b91ca42f18759098d3fef6eaab05 rpc: use `HexToPubKey` helper for all legacy pubkey-parsing RPCs (Sebastian Falbesoner) 100e8a75bf5d8196c005331bd8f2ed42ada6d8d0 rpc: check and throw specific pubkey parsing errors in `HexToPubKey` (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: Parsing legacy public keys can fail for three reasons (in this order): - pubkey is not in hex - pubkey has an invalid length (not 33 or 65 bytes for compressed/uncompressed, respectively) - pubkey is crytographically invalid, i.e. is not on curve (`CPubKey.IsFullyValid()` check) Many RPCs currently perform these checks manually with different error messages, even though we already have a `HexToPubKey` helper. This PR puts all three checks in this helper (the length check was done on the call-sites before), adds specific error messages for each case, and consequently uses it for all RPCs that parse legacy pubkeys. This leads to deduplicated code and also to more consistent and detailed error messages for the user. Affected RPC calls are `createmultisig`, `addmultisigaddress`, `importpubkey`, `importmulti`, `fundrawtransaction`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `send` and `sendall`. Note that the error code (-5 a.k.a. `RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY`) doesn't change in any of the causes, so the changes are not breaking RPC API compatibility. Only the messages are more specific. The last commits adds test coverage for the cryptographically invalid (not-on-curve) pubkey case which wasn't exercised before. ACKs for top commit: stratospher: tested ACK 98570fe. davidgumberg: ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28336/commits/98570fe29bb08d7edc48011aa6b9731c6ab4ed2e Eunovo: Tested ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28336/commits/98570fe29bb08d7edc48011aa6b9731c6ab4ed2e achow101: ACK 98570fe29bb08d7edc48011aa6b9731c6ab4ed2e Tree-SHA512: cfa474176e95b5b18f3a9da28fdd9e87195cd58994c1331198f2840925fff322fd323a6371feab74a1b32e4b9ea58a6dc732fa751b4cdd45402c1029af609ece
2024-05-07Merge bitcoin-core/gui#819: Fix misleading signmessage error with segwitmerge-script
fb9f150759b22772dd48983a2be1ea397245e289 gui: fix misleading signmessage error with segwit (willcl-ark) Pull request description: As described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10542 (and numerous other places), message signing in Bitcoin Core does not support "signing with a segwit address" and likely will not in the foreseeable future, or at least until a new message-signing standard is agreed upon. Therefore update the possibly misleading error message presented to the user in the GUI to detail more specifically the reason their message cannot be signed, in the case that a non P2PKH address is entered. This change takes the [suggested wording](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10542#issuecomment-1960313569) from @adiabat. Perhaps with this we can close https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10542 ? ACKs for top commit: hebasto: ACK fb9f150759b22772dd48983a2be1ea397245e289. Tree-SHA512: 5ba8d722ad3632dad2e0a2aa94b0f466b904e7885a247a5d26ebdfce54e3611090b103029d8dfce92adc49e50fe5f4830f687d867b4c56c3ea997e519b4e188d
2024-05-07Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29494: build: Assume HAVE_CONFIG_H, Add IWYU pragma ↵Ava Chow
keep to bitcoin-config.h includes fa09451f8e6799682d7e7c863f25334fd1c7dce3 Add lint check for bitcoin-config.h include IWYU pragma (MarcoFalke) dddd40ba8267dea11a3eb03d5cf8b51dbb99be5d scripted-diff: Add IWYU pragma keep to bitcoin-config.h includes (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: The `bitcoin-config.h` includes have issues: * The header is incompatible with iwyu, because symbols may be defined or not defined. So the `IWYU pragma: keep` is needed to keep the include when a symbol is not defined on a platform. Compare the previous discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29408#issuecomment-1948959711 * Guarding the includes by `HAVE_CONFIG_H` is verbose and brittle. Now that all build config dependencies have been removed from low level headers, the benefits are questionable, and the guard can be removed. The linter could also be tricked by guarding the include by `#if defined(HAVE_C0NFIG_H)` (`O` replaced by `0`). Compare the previous discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29404#discussion_r1483189853 . ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK fa09451f8e6799682d7e7c863f25334fd1c7dce3 TheCharlatan: ACK fa09451f8e6799682d7e7c863f25334fd1c7dce3 hebasto: re-ACK fa09451f8e6799682d7e7c863f25334fd1c7dce3, only rebased since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29494#pullrequestreview-2028864535) (`timedata.cpp` removed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29623). Tree-SHA512: 47cb973f7f24bc625acc4e78683371863675d186780236d55d886cf4130e05a78bb04f1d731aae7088313b8e963a9677cc77cf518187dbd99d776f6421ca9b52
2024-05-07Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29984: net: Replace ifname check with IFF_LOOPBACK in ↵merge-script
Discover a68fed111be393ddbbcd7451f78bc63601253ee0 net: Fix misleading comment for Discover (laanwj) 7766dd280d9a4a7ffdfcec58224d0985cfd4169b net: Replace ifname check with IFF_LOOPBACK in Discover (laanwj) Pull request description: Checking the interface name is kind of brittle. In the age of network namespaces and containers, there is no reason a loopback interface can't be called differently. Check for the `IFF_LOOPBACK` flag to detect loopback interface instead. Also remove a misleading comment in Discover's doc comment. ACKs for top commit: sipa: utACK a68fed111be393ddbbcd7451f78bc63601253ee0 willcl-ark: utACK a68fed111be393ddbbcd7451f78bc63601253ee0 theuni: utACK a68fed111be393ddbbcd7451f78bc63601253ee0. Satoshi-era brittleness :) Tree-SHA512: e2d7fc541f40f6a6af08286e7bcb0873ff55debdcd8b38b03f274897b673a6fb51d84d6c7241a02a9567ddf2645f50231d91bb1f55307ba7c6e68196c29b0edf
2024-05-07doc: rpc: fix submitpackage examplesstickies-v
2024-05-07rpc: update min package size error message in submitpackagestickies-v
Currently, the only allowed package topology has a min size of 2. Update the error message to reflect that.
2024-05-07doc: rpc: submitpackage takes sorted arraystickies-v
2024-05-06refactor: Simply include CTxMemPool::Options in CTxMemPool directly rather ↵Luke Dashjr
than duplicating definition
2024-05-06Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29845: rpc: return warnings as an array instead of ↵Ava Chow
just a single one 42fb5311b19582361409d65c6fddeadbee14bb97 rpc: return warnings as an array instead of just a single one (stickies-v) Pull request description: The RPC documentation for `getblockchaininfo`, `getmininginfo` and `getnetworkinfo` states that "warnings" returns "any network and blockchain warnings". In practice, only a single warning (i.e. the latest one that is set) is returned, the other ones are ignored. Fix that by returning all warnings as an array. As a side benefit, clean up the GetWarnings() logic. Since this PR changes the RPC result schema, I've added release notes. Users can temporarily revert to the old results by using `-deprecatedrpc=warnings`, until it's removed in a future version. --- Some historical context from git log: - when `GetWarnings` was introduced in 401926283a200994ecd7df8eae8ced8e0b067c46, it was used in the `getinfo` RPC, where only a [single error/warning was returned](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/401926283a200994ecd7df8eae8ced8e0b067c46#diff-7442c48d42cd5455a79915a0f00cce5e13359db46437a32b812876edb0a5ccddR250) (similar to how it is now). - later on, "warnings" RPC response fields were introduced, e.g. in ef2a3de25c882396e1776b554878d2784b6b7391, with the description [stating](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/ef2a3de25c882396e1776b554878d2784b6b7391#diff-1021bd3c74415ad9719bd764ad6ca35af5dfb33b1cd863c0be49bdf52518af54R411) that it returned "any network warnings" but in practice still only a single warning was returned ACKs for top commit: achow101: re-ACK 42fb5311b19582361409d65c6fddeadbee14bb97 tdb3: Re ACK for 42fb5311b19582361409d65c6fddeadbee14bb97 TheCharlatan: ACK 42fb5311b19582361409d65c6fddeadbee14bb97 maflcko: ACK 42fb5311b19582361409d65c6fddeadbee14bb97 🔺 Tree-SHA512: 4225ed8979cd5f030dec785a80e7452a041ad5703445da79d2906ada983ed0bbe7b15889d663d75aae4a77d92e302c93e93eca185c7bd47c9cce29e12f752bd3
2024-05-06Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29773: build, bench, msvc: Add missing benchmarksmerge-script
31a15f0aff79d2b34a9640909b9e6fb39a647b60 bench: Disable WalletCreate* benchmarks when building with MSVC (Hennadii Stepanov) 23dc0c19acd54cad1bed2f14df024b6b533f2330 msvc, bench: Add missing source files to bench_bitcoin project (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: On the master branch, the `bench_bitcoin.vcxproj` MSVC project misses wallet-specific source files. This PR fixes this issue. Benchmark run on Windows: ``` > src\bench_bitcoin.exe -filter="CoinSelection|BnBExhaustion|Wallet.*" | ns/op | op/s | err% | total | benchmark |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:---------- | 398,800.00 | 2,507.52 | 1.5% | 0.01 | `BnBExhaustion` | 584,450.00 | 1,711.01 | 1.5% | 0.01 | `CoinSelection` | 86,603,650.00 | 11.55 | 0.4% | 1.91 | `WalletAvailableCoins` | 7,604.00 | 131,509.73 | 0.9% | 0.01 | `WalletBalanceClean` | 124,028.57 | 8,062.66 | 2.6% | 0.01 | `WalletBalanceDirty` | 7,587.12 | 131,802.30 | 1.9% | 0.01 | `WalletBalanceMine` | 48.58 | 20,583,872.99 | 0.9% | 0.01 | `WalletBalanceWatch` | 2,371,060.00 | 421.75 | 1.3% | 0.13 | `WalletCreateTxUseOnlyPresetInputs` | 96,861,760.00 | 10.32 | 0.9% | 5.31 | `WalletCreateTxUsePresetInputsAndCoinSelection` | 280.71 | 3,562,424.13 | 1.5% | 0.01 | `WalletIsMineDescriptors` | 1,033.47 | 967,618.32 | 0.3% | 0.01 | `WalletIsMineLegacy` | 282.36 | 3,541,599.91 | 0.5% | 0.01 | `WalletIsMineMigratedDescriptors` | 484,547,300.00 | 2.06 | 1.0% | 2.43 | `WalletLoadingDescriptors` | 29,924,300.00 | 33.42 | 0.4% | 0.15 | `WalletLoadingLegacy` ``` ACKs for top commit: maflcko: lgtm ACK 31a15f0aff79d2b34a9640909b9e6fb39a647b60 Tree-SHA512: 0241af06126edf612489322cdce66ba43792066b5400b1719a8b9d1ec62030e8a9d497e2f01e38290e94c387db59ccf2a458f4b35d3dc8030a1a1413d89eb792
2024-05-06build, test, doc: Temporarily remove Android-related stuffHennadii Stepanov
Previously, our Android builds were geared towards generating APKs, which relied on Qt. However, after migrating to C++20, compiling for Android became unfeasible due to Qt 5.15's compatibility limitations with NDK only up to r25, which includes an outdated embedded libc++. All removed stuff will be reinstated after migrating the build system to CMake and upgrading Qt to version 6.x."
2024-05-04net: reduce LOCK(cs_main) scope in ProcessGetBlockDataAndrew Toth
This also changes behavior if ReadBlockFromDisk or ReadRawBlockFromDisk fails. Previously, the node would crash due to an assert. This has been replaced with logging the error, disconnecting the peer, and returning early.
2024-05-04net: reduce LOCK(cs_main) scope in GETBLOCKTXNAndrew Toth
Also adds a static assertion that MAX_BLOCKTXN_DEPTH <= MIN_BLOCKS_TO_KEEP
2024-05-04Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28657: miniscript: make operator""_mst constevalmerge-script
63317103c9f2b0635558da814567bb79c17ae851 miniscript: make operator_mst consteval (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: It seems modern compilers don't realize that all invocations of operator""_mst can be evaluated at compile time, despite the `constexpr` keyword. Since C++20, we can force them to evaluate at compile time using `consteval`, turning all the miniscript type constants into actual compile-time constants. This should give a nice but not very important speedup for miniscript logic, but it's also a way to start testing C++20 features. ACKs for top commit: hebasto: re-ACK 63317103c9f2b0635558da814567bb79c17ae851. theuni: utACK 63317103c9f2b0635558da814567bb79c17ae851 Tree-SHA512: bdc9f1a6499b8bb3ca04f1a158c31e6876ba97206f95ee5718f50efd58b5b4e6b8867c07f791848430bfaa130b9676d8a68320b763cda9a340c75527acbfcc9e
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2025-03-16 17:35:30 +0000