aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-06-07minor: remove unnecessary semicolons from RPC content type examplesMatthew Zipkin
2024-06-07refactor: move orphanage constants to header fileGreg Sanders
2024-06-07bitcoin-cli: use json-rpc 2.0Matthew Zipkin
2024-06-07validation: Remove needs_init from LoadBlockIndexTheCharlatan
It does not control any actual logic and the log message as well as the comment are obsolete, since no database initialization takes place there anymore. Log messages indicating when indexes and chainstate databases are loaded exist in other places.
2024-06-07bugfix: Streamline setting reindex optionTheCharlatan
Reverts a bug introduced in b47bd959207e82555f07e028cc2246943d32d4c3 "kernel: De-globalize fReindex". The change leads to a GUI user being prompted to re-index on a chainstate loading failure more than once as well as the node actually not reindexing if the user chooses to. Fix this by setting the reindexing option instead of the atomic, which can be safely re-used to indicate that a reindex should be attempted. The bug specifically is caused by the chainman, and thus the blockman and its m_reindexing atomic being destroyed on every iteration of the for loop. The reindex option for ChainstateLoadOptions is currently also set in a confusing way. By using the reindex atomic, it is not obvious in which scenario it is true or false. The atomic is controlled by both the user passing the -reindex option, the user chosing to reindex if something went wrong during chainstate loading when running the gui, and by reading the reindexing flag from the block tree database in LoadBlockIndexDB. In practice this read is done through the chainstate module's CompleteChainstateInitialization's call to LoadBlockIndex. Since this is only done after the reindex option is set already, it does not have an effect on it. Make this clear by using the reindex option from the blockman opts which is only controlled by the user.
2024-06-06tests: add fuzz tests for VecDequePieter Wuille
2024-06-06util: add VecDequePieter Wuille
This is an STL-like container that interface-wise looks like std::deque, but is backed by a (fixed size, with vector-like capacity/reserve) circular buffer.
2024-06-06fuzz: add I2P harnessmarcofleon
2024-06-06net_processing: make MaybePunishNodeFor{Block,Tx} return voidPieter Wuille
2024-06-06refactor: disable self-assign warning for testsCory Fields
clang-16 and earlier detect "foo -= foo" and "foo /= foo" as self-assignments.
2024-06-06test: Add ReceiveWithExtraTransactions Compact Block receive test.AngusP
This new test uses the `vExtraTxnForCompact` (`extra_txn`) vector of optional orphan/conflicted/etc. transactions to provide a transaction in a compact block that was not otherwise present in our mempool. This also covers an improbable nullptr deref bug addressed in bf031a517c79cec5b43420bcd40291ab0e9f68a8 (#29752) where the `extra_txn` vec/circular-buffer was sometimes null-initialized and not yet filled when dereferenced in `PartiallyDownloadedBlock::InitData`.
2024-06-06test: refactor: Rename extra_txn to const empty_extra_txn as it is empty in ↵AngusP
all test cases
2024-06-05Reduce memory copying operations in bech32 encodeLőrinc
Here I've reduced the memory reallocations and copying operations in bech32 encode, making it ~15% faster. make && ./src/bench/bench_bitcoin --filter='Bech32Encode' --min-time=1000 Before: | ns/byte | byte/s | err% | total | benchmark |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:---------- | 19.97 | 50,074,562.72 | 0.1% | 1.06 | `Bech32Encode` After: | ns/byte | byte/s | err% | total | benchmark |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:---------- | 17.33 | 57,687,668.20 | 0.1% | 1.10 | `Bech32Encode` Co-authored-by: josibake <josibake@protonmail.com>
2024-06-05Reserve hrp memory in Decode and LocateErrorsLőrinc
2024-06-04chainparams: Add achow101 DNS seederAva Chow
2024-06-04Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30218: refactor: remove unused `CKey::Negate` methodAva Chow
8801e319d51209fe3a3b06e2aab5f96ceead290d refactor: remove unused `CKey::Negate` method (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This method was introduced as a pre-requirement for the v2 transport protocol back then (see PR #14047, commit 463921bb), when it was still BIP151. With the replacement BIP324, this is not needed anymore, and it's also unlikely that for any other proposal we'd ever need to negate private keys at this abstraction level. I'd argue that this operation is usually something that should happen within a secp256k1 module (like e.g. done in MuSig2, Silent Payments...). (If there is really demand in the future, it's also trivial to reintroduce the method.) ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK 8801e319d51209fe3a3b06e2aab5f96ceead290d sipa: ACK 8801e319d51209fe3a3b06e2aab5f96ceead290d achow101: ACK 8801e319d51209fe3a3b06e2aab5f96ceead290d Tree-SHA512: 7bc1566399635c5c6e4940a2724c865d5443eb190024379099330c023c516f1e4f423ed9e8c42bc93413b723a5464ec79d3f879f58c0e598fe24f495238df4ec
2024-06-04Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28307: rpc, wallet: fix incorrect segwit redeem script ↵Ava Chow
size limit 2451a217dd2c21b6d2f2b2699ceddd0bf9073019 test: addmultisigaddress, coverage for script size limits (furszy) 53302a09817e5b799d345dfea432546a55a9d727 bugfix: addmultisigaddress, add unsupported operation for redeem scripts over 520 bytes (furszy) 9be6065cc03f2408f290a332b203eef9c9cebf24 test: coverage for 16-20 segwit multisig scripts (furszy) 9d9a91c4ea6b3bb32ef4131bca86f1d6683fc901 rpc: bugfix, incorrect segwit redeem script size used in signrawtransactionwithkey (furszy) 0c9fedfc45fa7cbd6801ca5fd756863ec9a6911c fix incorrect multisig redeem script size limit for segwit (furszy) f7a173b5785cda460470df9a74a0e0f94d7f9a18 test: rpc_createmultisig, decouple 'test_sortedmulti_descriptors_bip67' (furszy) 4f33dbd8f8c0e29f37b04e6af6d2c7905ecceaf6 test: rpc_createmultisig, decouple 'test_mixing_uncompressed_and_compressed_keys' (furszy) 25a81705d376e8c96dad45436ae3fca975b3daf5 test: rpc_createmultisig, remove unnecessary checkbalances() (furszy) b5a328943362cfac6e90fd4e1b167c357d53b7d4 test: refactor, multiple cleanups in rpc_createmultisig.py (furszy) 3635d432681847313c098f9827483372a840e70f test: rpc_createmultisig, remove manual wallet initialization (furszy) Pull request description: Fixing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28250#issuecomment-1674830104 and more. Currently, redeem scripts longer than 520 bytes, which are technically valid under segwit rules, have flaws in the following processes: 1) The multisig creation process fails to deduce the output descriptor, resulting in the generation of an incorrect descriptor. Additionally, the accompanying user warning is also inaccurate. 2) The `signrawtransactionwithkey` RPC command fail to sign them. 3) The legacy wallet `addmultisigaddress` wrongly discards them. The issue arises because most of these flows are utilizing the legacy spkm keystore, which imposes the [p2sh max redeem script size rule](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/ded687334031f4790ef6a36b999fb30a79dcf7b3/src/script/signingprovider.cpp#L160) on all scripts. Which blocks segwit redeem scripts longer than the max element size in all the previously mentioned processes (`createmultisig`, `addmultisigaddress`, and `signrawtransactionwithkey`). This PR fixes the problem, enabling the creation of multisig output descriptors involving more than 15 keys and allowing the signing of these scripts, along with other post-segwit redeem scripts that surpass the 520-byte p2sh limit. Important note: Instead of adding support for these longer redeem scripts in the legacy wallet, an "unsupported operation" error has been added. The reasons behind this decision are: 1) The introduction of this feature brings about a compatibility-breaking change that requires downgrade protection; older wallets would be unable to interact with these "new" legacy wallets. 2) Considering the ongoing deprecation of the legacy spkm, this issue provides another compelling reason to transition towards descriptors. Testing notes: To easily verify each of the fixes, I decoupled the tests into standalone commits. So they can be cherry-picked on top of master. Where `rpc_createmultisig.py` (with and without the `--legacy-wallet` arg) will fail without the bugs fixes commits. Extra note: The initial commits improves the `rpc_createmultisig.py` test in many ways. I found this test very antiquated, screaming for an update and cleanup. ACKs for top commit: pinheadmz: ACK 2451a217dd2c21b6d2f2b2699ceddd0bf9073019 theStack: Code-review ACK 2451a217dd2c21b6d2f2b2699ceddd0bf9073019 achow101: ACK 2451a217dd2c21b6d2f2b2699ceddd0bf9073019 Tree-SHA512: 71794533cbd46b3a1079fb4e9d190d3ea3b615de0cbfa443466e14f05e4616ca90e12ce2bf07113515ea8113e64a560ad572bb9ea9d4835b6fb67b6ae596167f
2024-06-04Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28074: fuzz: wallet, add target for `Crypter`Ava Chow
d7290d662f494503f28e087dd728b492c0bb2c5f fuzz: wallet, add target for Crypter (Ayush Singh) Pull request description: This PR adds fuzz coverage for `wallet/crypter`. Motivation: Issue [27272](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27272#issue-1628327906) I ran this for a long time with Sanitizers on and had no crashes; the average `exec/sec` also looks good to me. However, I would really appreciate it if some of the reviewers could try it on their machines too, and give their feedback. ACKs for top commit: maflcko: utACK d7290d662f494503f28e087dd728b492c0bb2c5f achow101: ACK d7290d662f494503f28e087dd728b492c0bb2c5f brunoerg: utACK d7290d662f494503f28e087dd728b492c0bb2c5f Tree-SHA512: f5c496cabdd3263a7e1ad49eeff702725336f76bf19a82e5dbbead082e990889dd43c851d0d2d6ab740f44b8ec2aa06defd9ff6b02be68b5f8b4eaf963f88599
2024-06-04Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30047: refactor: Model the bech32 charlimit as an EnumAva Chow
7f3f6c6dc80247e6dfb0d406dc53bc8198f029fd refactor: replace hardcoded numbers (Lőrinc) 5676aec1e1a6d2c6fd3099e120e263a0a7def089 refactor: Model the bech32 charlimit as an Enum (josibake) Pull request description: Broken out from #28122 --- Bech32(m) was defined with a 90 character limit so that certain guarantees for error detection could be made for segwit addresses (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0173.mediawiki#checksum-design). However, there is nothing about the encoding scheme itself that requires a limit of 90 and in practice bech32(m) is being used without the 90 char limit (e.g. lightning invoices, silent payments). Further, increasing the character limit doesn't do away with error detection, it simply changes the guarantee. The primary motivation for this change is for being able to parse BIP352 v0 silent payment addresses (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28122/commits/622c7a98b9f08177a3cfb601306daabb101af1fd), which require up to 118 characters. In addition to BIP352, modeling the character limit as an enum allows us to easily support new address types that use bech32m and specify their own character limit. ACKs for top commit: paplorinc: re-ACK 7f3f6c6dc80247e6dfb0d406dc53bc8198f029fd achow101: ACK 7f3f6c6dc80247e6dfb0d406dc53bc8198f029fd theuni: utACK 7f3f6c6dc80247e6dfb0d406dc53bc8198f029fd Tree-SHA512: 9c793d657448c1f795093b9f7d4d6dfa431598f48d54e1c899a69fb2f43aeb68b40ca2ff08864eefeeb6627d4171877234b5df0056ff2a2b84415bc3558bd280
2024-06-04Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29997: rpc: Remove index-based Arg accessorAva Chow
fa3169b0732d7eb4b9166e7ecc6b7cfb669a9b54 rpc: Remove index-based Arg accessor (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: The index-based Arg accessor is redundant with the name-based one. It does not provide any benefit to the code reader, or otherwise, so remove it. ACKs for top commit: stickies-v: re-ACK fa3169b0732d7eb4b9166e7ecc6b7cfb669a9b54, addressed doc nits achow101: ACK fa3169b0732d7eb4b9166e7ecc6b7cfb669a9b54 ryanofsky: Code review ACK fa3169b0732d7eb4b9166e7ecc6b7cfb669a9b54. One changes since last review are some documentation improvements Tree-SHA512: f9da1c049dbf38c3b47a8caf8d24d195c2d4b88c7ec45a9ccfb78f1e39f29cb86869f84b308f6e49856b074c06604ab634c90eb89c9c93d2a8169e070aa1bd40
2024-06-04Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28979: wallet, rpc: document and update `sendall` ↵Ava Chow
behavior around unconfirmed inputs 71aae72e1fc998b2629d68a7301d85dc1b65641e test: test sendall does ancestor aware funding (ishaanam) 36757941a05b65c2b61a83820afdf5effd8fc9a2 wallet, rpc: implement ancestor aware funding for sendall (ishaanam) 544131f3fba9ea07fee29f9d3ee0116cd5d8a5b2 rpc, test: test sendall spends unconfirmed change and unconfirmed inputs when specified (ishaanam) Pull request description: This PR: - Adds a functional test that `sendall` spends unconfirmed change - Adds a functional test that `sendall` spends regular unconfirmed inputs when specified by user - Adds ancestor aware funding to `sendall` by using `calculateCombinedBumpFee` and adjusting the effective value accordingly - Adds a functional test for ancestor aware funding in `sendall` ACKs for top commit: S3RK: ACK 71aae72e1fc998b2629d68a7301d85dc1b65641e achow101: ACK 71aae72e1fc998b2629d68a7301d85dc1b65641e furszy: ACK 71aae72e1f Tree-SHA512: acaeb7c65166ce53123a1d6cb5012197202246acc02ef9f37a28154cc93afdbd77c25e840ab79bdc7e0b88904014a43ab1ddea79d5337dc310ea210634ab61f0
2024-06-04Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28366: Fix waste calculation in SelectionResultAva Chow
bd34dd85e7b8b4cc26d2173d84bbeda2e9c27624 Use `exact_target` shorthand in coinselector_tests (Murch) 7aa7e30441fe77bf8e8092916e36b004bbbfe2a7 Fold GetSelectionWaste() into ComputeAndSetWaste() (Murch) Pull request description: PR #26152 moved waste calculation into SelectionResult to be able to correct the waste score on basis of the bump_fee_group_discount for overlapping ancestries. This left two functions with largely overlapping purpose, where one was simply a wrapper of the other. This PR cleans up the overlap, and fixes the double-meaning of `change_cost` where the `GetChange()` function assumed that no change was created when `change_cost` was set to 0. This behavior was exploited in a bunch of tests, but is problematic, because a `change_cost` of 0 is permitted with custom settings for feerate and discard_feerate (i.e. when they’re both 0). ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK bd34dd85e7b8b4cc26d2173d84bbeda2e9c27624 furszy: Code ACK bd34dd85e7b8b4cc26d2173d84bbeda2e9c27624 ismaelsadeeq: Code Review ACK bd34dd85e7b8b4cc26d2173d84bbeda2e9c27624 Tree-SHA512: 83a2688d45d719dc61a64b5180fe136107faccf401a59df65245c05d701748a03e85ed56fde8c9b7ef39a3ab54374dd3718c559bda5b3f55dafedfd7fed25161
2024-06-04Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30211: fuzz: Make FuzzedSock fuzz friendliermerge-script
22d0f1a27ef7733b51b3c2138a8d01713df8f248 [fuzz] Avoid endless waiting in FuzzedSock::{Wait,WaitMany} (marcofleon) a7fceda68bb62fe3d9060fcf52e33b2f64a2acf9 [fuzz] Make peeking through FuzzedSock::Recv fuzzer friendly (dergoegge) 865cdf3692590bc6b1121524fe1bee188788b791 [fuzz] Use fuzzer friendly ConsumeRandomLengthByteVector in FuzzedSock::Recv (dergoegge) Pull request description: `FuzzedSock` has a few issues that block a fuzzer from making progress. See commit messages for details. ACKs for top commit: marcofleon: Tested ACK 22d0f1a27ef7733b51b3c2138a8d01713df8f248 brunoerg: utACK 22d0f1a27ef7733b51b3c2138a8d01713df8f248 Tree-SHA512: 2d66fc94ba58b6652ae234bd1dcd33b7d685b5054fe83e0cd624b053dd51519c23148f43a865ab8c8bc5fc2dc25e701952831b99159687474978a90348faa4c5
2024-06-03refactor: remove unused `CKey::Negate` methodSebastian Falbesoner
This method was introduced as a pre-requirement for the v2 transport protocol back then (see PR #14047, commit 463921bb), when it was still BIP151. With the replacement BIP324, this is not needed anymore, and it's also unlikely that any other proposal would need to negate private keys at this abstraction level. (If there is really demand, it's trivial to reintroduce the method.)
2024-06-03Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30215: doc: JSON-RPC request Content-Type is ↵merge-script
application/json 3c08e11c3ea4499e8d20609e2417cac859b3e98e doc: JSON-RPC request Content-Type is application/json (Luke Dashjr) Pull request description: Specify json content type in RPC examples. Picks up #29946. Which needed rebasing and the commit message fixing, ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK 3c08e11c3ea4499e8d20609e2417cac859b3e98e tdb3: ACK for 3c08e11c3ea4499e8d20609e2417cac859b3e98e Tree-SHA512: 770bbbc0fb324cb63628980b13583cabf02e75079851850170587fb6eca41a70b01dcedaf1926bb6488eb9816a3cc6616fe8cee8c4b7e09aa39b7df5834ca0ec
2024-06-03Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30134: fuzz: add more coverage for `ScriptPubKeyMan`merge-script
e3249f21111f1dd4beb66f10af933c34a36c30ac fuzz: add more coverage for `ScriptPubKeyMan` (brunoerg) Pull request description: This PR adds more coverage for `ScriptPubKeyMan`: - Check `GetKey` and `HasPrivKey` after adding descriptor key. - Cover `GetEndRange` and `GetKeyPoolSize`. - Cover `MarkUnusedAddresses` with the scripts from ScriptPubKeys and `GetMetadata` with the destinations from them. ACKs for top commit: marcofleon: Tested ACK e3249f21111f1dd4beb66f10af933c34a36c30ac. I ran the updated harness for ~9 hours on an empty corpus, generated a coverage report, and checked that the new functions mentioned were hit. Coverage of `scriptpubkeyman.cpp` increased. murchandamus: Tested ACK e3249f21111f1dd4beb66f10af933c34a36c30ac Tree-SHA512: cfab91f6c8401174842e79209c0e9225c08f011fe9b41d0a58bcec716ae4545eaf803867f899ed7b5fbcefea45711f91894e36df082ba19732dd310cd9e61a79
2024-06-03Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30216: build: Fix building `fuzz` binary on on SunOS / ↵merge-script
illumos 3299abce948f205bb1354993614b669189f9b89f build: Fix building `fuzz` binary on on SunOS / illumos (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: On master branch @ 457e1846d2bf6ef9d54b9ba1a330ba8bbff13091, building the `fuzz` binary fails: ``` $ ./autogen.sh $ ./configure $ gmake -C src test/fuzz/fuzz < snip > CXX test/fuzz/fuzz-http_request.o test/fuzz/http_request.cpp:13:10: fatal error: event2/buffer.h: No such file or directory 13 | #include <event2/buffer.h> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ compilation terminated. gmake: *** [Makefile:17138: test/fuzz/fuzz-http_request.o] Error 1 gmake: Leaving directory '/export/home/hebasto/git/bitcoin/src' ``` The testing system: ``` $ uname -a SunOS openindiana 5.11 illumos-82079dec87 i86pc i386 i86pc ``` This PR fixes this issue. ACKs for top commit: maflcko: ACK 3299abce948f205bb1354993614b669189f9b89f Tree-SHA512: 43048cf0d3db47d71263da179e07225afd901ed2039ee4d17314ff7b581ab36f41282fde3b1210926cecda546320dc573937c564520f61fbb236c2b9914ed0d4
2024-06-03[fuzz] Avoid endless waiting in FuzzedSock::{Wait,WaitMany}marcofleon
Currently, when the FuzzedDataProvider of a FuzzedSock runs out of data, FuzzedSock::Wait and WaitMany will simulate endless waiting as the requested events are never simulated as occured. Fix this by simulating event occurence when ConsumeBool() returns false (e.g. when the data provider runs out). Co-authored-by: dergoegge <n.goeggi@gmail.com>
2024-06-03[fuzz] Make peeking through FuzzedSock::Recv fuzzer friendlydergoegge
FuzzedSock only supports peeking at one byte at a time, which is not fuzzer friendly when trying to receive long data. Fix this by supporting peek data of arbitrary length instead of only one byte.
2024-06-03Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30167: doc, rpc: Release notes and follow-ups for #29612merge-script
efc1b5be8a4696c0db19ba18316b2d4ed09e10f2 test: Add coverage for txid coins count check when loading snapshot (Fabian Jahr) 6b6084850b8c2ebcdbeecdb406e8732adaa6d23c assumeutxo: Add network magic ctor param to SnapshotMetadata (Fabian Jahr) 1f1f9984555d49f07ae20cb3a8153a177c546beb assumeutxo: Deserialize trailing byte instead of Txid (Fabian Jahr) 359967e310794e0bbdbe2bca38ee440a88bc4f43 doc: Add release notes for #29612 (Fabian Jahr) Pull request description: This adds release notes for #29612 and addresses post-merge review comments. ACKs for top commit: maflcko: utACK efc1b5be8a4696c0db19ba18316b2d4ed09e10f2 theStack: utACK efc1b5be8a4696c0db19ba18316b2d4ed09e10f2 Tree-SHA512: 3b270202e4f7b2576090ef1d970fd54a6840d96fc3621dddd28e888fb8696a97ff69af2e000bcee3b364316ca3f6e2a9b2f1694c6184f0e704dc487823127ce4
2024-06-03Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30186: fuzz: increase `txorphan` harness stabilitymerge-script
8defc182a31d828ad0f53ebf7e3be9e9cfc42d09 scripted-diff: Replace nNextSweep with m_next_sweep (marcofleon) 0048680467e15037023ceae44bc2dc8309f82f39 increase txorphan harness stability (marcofleon) Pull request description: This moves `nNextSweep` from being a static variable in `LimitOrphans` to being a member of the `TxOrphanage` class. This improves the stability of the `txorphan` fuzz harness, as each orphanage (created every iteration) now has its own value for `nNextSweep`. ACKs for top commit: maflcko: utACK 8defc182a31d828ad0f53ebf7e3be9e9cfc42d09 dergoegge: Code review ACK 8defc182a31d828ad0f53ebf7e3be9e9cfc42d09 glozow: utACK 8defc182a31d828ad0f53ebf7e3be9e9cfc42d09, I can rebase on this pretty easily Tree-SHA512: 54d4a5074def764f6c895308b94e417662d2f21f157925421131745f22743907df59971f4ce545063658cd74ec133792cdd8df96ae3e69af8314e9b0ff899d48
2024-06-02build: Fix building `fuzz` binary on on SunOS / illumosHennadii Stepanov
2024-06-02[policy] make v3 transactions standardglozow
Note that, as CURRENT_VERSION = 2, the wallet will not make transactions with nVersion=3 yet.
2024-05-31doc: JSON-RPC request Content-Type is application/jsonLuke Dashjr
Specify json content type in RPC examples
2024-05-31[fuzz] Use fuzzer friendly ConsumeRandomLengthByteVector in FuzzedSock::Recvdergoegge
See comment on FuzzedDataProvider::ConsumeRandomLengthString.
2024-05-31net: log connections failures via SOCKS5 with less severityVasil Dimov
It is expected to have some Bitcoin nodes unreachable some of the time. A failure to connect to an IPv4 or IPv6 node is already properly logged under category=net/severity=debug. Do the same when a connection fails when using a SOCKS5 proxy. This could be either to an .onion address or to an IPv4 or IPv6 address (via a Tor exit node). Related: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29759
2024-05-31[refactor] use TRUC_VERSION in place of 3glozow
2024-05-30net_processing: remove Misbehavior score and incrementsPieter Wuille
This is now all unused.
2024-05-30net_processing: make all Misbehaving increments = 100Pieter Wuille
This removes the need to actually track misbehavior score (see further commit), because any Misbehaving node will immediately hit the discouragement threshold.
2024-05-30net_processing: drop 8 headers threshold for incoming BIP130Pieter Wuille
With the Misbehavior score gone for non-connecting headers (see previous commit), there is no need to only treat headers messages with up to 8 headers as potential BIP130 announcements. BIP130 does not specify such a limit; it was purely a heuristic.
2024-05-30net_processing: drop Misbehavior for unconnecting headersPieter Wuille
This misbehavior was originally intended to prevent bandwidth wastage due to actually observed very broken (but likely non-malicious) nodes that respond to GETHEADERS with a response unrelated to the request, triggering a request cycle. This has however largely been addressed by the previous commit, which causes non-connecting HEADERS that are received while a GETHEADERS has not been responded to, to be ignored, as long as they do not time out (2 minutes). With that, the specific misbehavior is largely irrelevant (for inbound peers, it is now harmless; for outbound peers, the eviction logic will eventually kick them out if they're not keeping up with headers at all).
2024-05-30net_processing: do not treat non-connecting headers as responsePieter Wuille
Since https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25454 we keep track of the last GETHEADERS request that was sent and wasn't responded to. So far, every incoming HEADERS message is treated as a response to whatever GETHEADERS was last sent, regardless of its contents. This commit makes this tracking more accurate, by only treating HEADERS messages which (1) are empty, (2) connect to our existing block header tree, or (3) are a continuation of a low-work headers sync as responses that clear the "outstanding GETHEADERS" state (m_last_getheaders_timestamp). That means that HEADERS messages which do not satisfy any of the above criteria will be ignored, not triggering a GETHEADERS, and potentially (for now, but see later commit) increase misbehavior score.
2024-05-30clang-tidy: Add `bugprone-move-forwarding-reference` checkHennadii Stepanov
2024-05-30Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30049: build, test, doc: Temporarily remove ↵merge-script
Android-related stuff 5deb0b024e14c7c63d405c651d1ca323560a1c21 build, test, doc: Temporarily remove Android-related stuff (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: Previously, our Android builds were geared towards generating APKs, which relied on Qt. However, after migrating to C++20, compiling for Android became unfeasible due to Qt 5.15's compatibility limitations with NDK only up to r25, which includes an outdated embedded libc++ (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29360). All removed stuff will be reinstated after migrating the build system to CMake and upgrading Qt to version 6.x. This PR makes possible a clean migration to the CMake-based build system as it removes code, which is not used at this moment. ACKs for top commit: vasild: ACK 5deb0b024e14c7c63d405c651d1ca323560a1c21 fanquake: ACK 5deb0b024e14c7c63d405c651d1ca323560a1c21 - given none of this is currently tested/wont compile. Can be revisted in future. Tree-SHA512: 3bc2ccfe881e11cc1d78c27acd6f1d86cfba86821ef3bb5eca2e80d978fdfa13659ec82284dcaadc507e2394524dea91d4b8f81d0030c1cef9708df8be76bf07
2024-05-29refactor: use recommended type hiding on multi_index typesCory Fields
Recommended by boost docs: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_85_0/libs/multi_index/doc/compiler_specifics.html#type_hiding This significantly reduces the size of the symbol name lengths that end up in the binaries as well as in compiler warnings/errors. Otherwise there should be no functional change. Example before: 0000000000000000 W unsigned long boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256>, boost::multi_index::detail::nth_layer<1, CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry> >, boost::mpl::vector0<mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_unique_tag>::count<uint256, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256> >(uint256 const&, SaltedTxidHasher const&, std::equal_to<uint256> const&, mpl_::bool_<false>) const After: 0000000000000000 W unsigned long boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256>, boost::multi_index::detail::nth_layer<1, CTxMemPoolEntry, CTxMemPool::CTxMemPoolEntry_Indicies, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry> >, boost::mpl::vector0<mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_unique_tag>::count<uint256, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256> >(uint256 const&, SaltedTxidHasher const&, std::equal_to<uint256> const&, mpl_::bool_<false>) const
2024-05-29qa: a fuzz target for the block index databaseAntoine Poinsot
2024-05-29scripted-diff: Replace nNextSweep with m_next_sweepmarcofleon
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i 's/nNextSweep/m_next_sweep/g' $(git grep -l 'nNextSweep') -END VERIFY SCRIPT- fixing to match style
2024-05-29increase txorphan harness stabilitymarcofleon
initialize variable
2024-05-29Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30122: bench: enable wallet creation benchmarks on all ↵merge-script
platforms 7c8abf3c2001152423da06d25f9f4906611685ea bench: bugfix, properly release wallet before erasing directory (furszy) Pull request description: Simple fix for #29816. Since the wallet is appended to the global `WalletContext` during creation, merely calling `reset()` on the benchmark shared_pointer is insufficient to destruct the wallet. This no destruction of the wallet object results in keeping the db connection open, which was causes the `fs::remove_all()` failure on Windows. ACKs for top commit: maflcko: utACK 7c8abf3c2001152423da06d25f9f4906611685ea kevkevinpal: utACK [7c8abf3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30122/commits/7c8abf3c2001152423da06d25f9f4906611685ea) hebasto: re-ACK 7c8abf3c2001152423da06d25f9f4906611685ea, I agree with changes since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30122#pullrequestreview-2061694682). Tree-SHA512: 279df65bea8f7aa02af0a2efed62dca9bf9b29cb748eb369c602d223e08a8a907dea7b1bffbd3dab91b1656c1d91b18a9a0534bc3f153bd751414b0e6230b3a4
2024-05-29Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30172: fuzz: Handle missing BDBRO errorsmerge-script
9ddf39dd87a3729ceedaa05a207621a02c532536 fuzz: Handle missing BDBRO errors (Ava Chow) Pull request description: Adds error messages that were not being handled. Also removes error messages that no longer exist. Fixes #30166 ACKs for top commit: dergoegge: reACK 9ddf39dd87a3729ceedaa05a207621a02c532536 TheCharlatan: ACK 9ddf39dd87a3729ceedaa05a207621a02c532536 Tree-SHA512: 2597536a1e5d030653dfcb02fd892f7492f5a091def787f6cbd421b8bca9544847684a498e9458ea99ae7de5a8a6d91532ff904d1e39222d324939d31d2eb3f0
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2025-03-16 08:20:36 +0000