| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This change fixes the `apk` target build after bumping Qt version from
5.15.5 to 5.15.10.
|
|
|
|
To avoid recursive calls in shared_ptr's destructor that could lead to a
stack overflow.
|
|
We make the Satisfier a base in which to store the common methods
between the Tapscript and P2WSH satisfier, and from which they both
inherit.
A field is added to SignatureData to be able to satisfy pkh() under
Tapscript context (to get the pubkey hash preimage) without wallet data.
For instance in `finalizepsbt` RPC. See also the next commits for a
functional test that exercises this.
|
|
We'll need the Miniscript satisfier for Tapscript too.
|
|
|
|
64-hex-characters public keys are valid in Miniscript key expressions
within a Tapscript context.
Keys under a Tapscript context always serialize as 32-bytes x-only
public keys (and that's what get hashed by OP_HASH160 on the stack too).
|
|
In order to exacerbate a mistake in the stack size tracking logic,
sometimes pad the witness to make the script execute at the brink of the
stack size limit. This way if the stack size is underestimated for a
script it would immediately fail `VerifyScript`.
|
|
|
|
Under Tapscript, due to the lifting of some standardness and consensus
limits, scripts can now run into the maximum stack size during
execution. Any Miniscript that may hit the limit on any of its spending
paths must be marked as unsafe.
Co-Authored-By: Pieter Wuille <pieter@wuille.net>
|
|
We introduce another global that dictates the script context under which
to operate when running the target.
For miniscript_script, just consume another byte to set the context.
This should only affect existing seeds to the extent they contain a
CHECKMULTISIG. However it would not invalidate them entirely as they may
contain a NUMEQUAL or a CHECKSIGADD, and this still exercises a bit of
the parser.
For miniscript_string, reduce the string size by one byte and use the
last byte to determine the context. This is the change that i think
would invalidate the lowest number of existing seeds.
For miniscript_stable, we don't want to invalidate any seed. Instead of
creating a new miniscript_stable_tapscript, simply run the target once
for P2WSH and once for Tapscript (with the same seed).
For miniscript_smart, consume one byte before generating a pseudo-random
node to set the context. We have less regard for seed stability for this
target anyways.
|
|
Adapt the test data and the parsing context to support x-only keys.
Adapt the Test() helper to test existing cases under both Tapscript and
P2WSH context, asserting what needs to be valid or not in each.
Finally, add more cases that exercise the logic that was added in the
previous commits (multi_a, different resource checks and keys
serialization under Tapscript, different properties for 'd:' fragment,
..).
|
|
We'll need to get a compressed key out of an x-only one in other places.
Avoid duplicating the code.
|
|
|
|
Under Tapscript, there is:
- No limit on the number of OPs
- No limit on the script size, it's implicitly limited by the maximum
(standard) transaction size.
- No standardness limit on the number of stack items, it's limited by
the consensus MAX_STACK_SIZE. This requires tracking the maximum stack
size at all times during script execution, which will be tackled in
its own commit.
In order to avoid any Miniscript that would not be spendable by a
standard transaction because of the size of the witness, we limit the
script size under Tapscript to the maximum standard transaction size
minus the maximum possible witness and Taproot control block sizes. Note
this is a conservative limit but it still allows for scripts more than a
hundred times larger than under P2WSH.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Tapscript MINIMALIF is a consensus rule, so we can rely on the fact
that the `DUP IF [X] ENDIF` will always put an exact 1 on the stack upon
satisfaction.
|
|
It is the equivalent of multi() but for Tapscript, using CHECKSIGADD
instead of CHECKMULTISIG.
It shares the same properties as multi() but for 'n', since a threshold
multi_a() may have an empty vector as the top element of its
satisfaction. It could also have the 'o' property when it only has a
single key, but in this case a 'pk()' is always preferable anyways.
|
|
CHECKMULTISIG is disabled for Tapscript. Instead, we'll introduce
a multi_a() fragment with the same semantic as multi().
|
|
Some checks will be different depending on the script context (for
instance the maximum script size).
|
|
We are going to introduce Tapscript support in Miniscript, for which
some of Miniscript rules and properties change (new or modified
fragments, different typing rules, different resources consumption, ..).
|
|
It's true that for any public key there'll be a signature check in a
valid Miniscript. The code would previously, when computing the size of
a satisfaction, account for the signature when it sees a public key
push. Instead, account for it when it is required (ie when encountering
the `c:` wrapper). This has two benefits:
- Allows to accurately compute the net effect of a fragment on the stack
size. This is necessary to track the size of the stack during the
execution of a Script.
- It also just makes more sense, making the code more accessible to
future contributors.
|
|
This was calling the wrong constructor.
|
|
b442580ed2a6173f0cfb86f265887d783dde3ff8 gui: remove legacy wallet creation (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixes #763
Preventing users from creating a legacy wallet prior to its deprecation in the upcoming releases.
Note:
This is still available using the `createwallet` RPC command.
Future Note:
Would be nice to re-write this modal as a wizard. And improve the design.
<details><summary> Pre-Changes Screenshot </summary>
<img width="611" alt="Screenshot 2023-10-06 at 11 30 14" src="https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/assets/5377650/ca10c97d-46e8-4aed-82da-068f2afbe25c">
</details>
<details><summary> Post-Changes Screenshot </summary>
<img width="729" alt="Screenshot 2023-10-06 at 11 32 58" src="https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/assets/5377650/f6bdcb57-646a-43d8-86a7-476e3cca683f">
</details>
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b442580ed2a6173f0cfb86f265887d783dde3ff8
hebasto:
re-ACK b442580ed2a6173f0cfb86f265887d783dde3ff8
pablomartin4btc:
tACK b442580ed2a6173f0cfb86f265887d783dde3ff8
Tree-SHA512: f5d26ffbb0962648b9edf273b325e89425a318e136df26a26acb21b88730fd7d6499c68a705680539dc1b40862fbf413a1e0c8572436a0cfc665e2d08a3cf97d
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
|
|
|
|
of regtest
5b878be742dbfcd232d949d2df1fff4743aec3d8 [doc] add release note for submitpackage (glozow)
7a9bb2a2a59ba49f80519c8435229abec2432486 [rpc] allow submitpackage to be called outside of regtest (glozow)
5b9087a9a7da2602485e85e0b163dc3cbd2daf31 [rpc] require package to be a tree in submitpackage (glozow)
e32ba1599c599e75b1da3393f71f633de860505f [txpackages] IsChildWithParentsTree() (glozow)
b4f28cc345ef9c5261c4a8d743654a44784c7802 [doc] parent pay for child in aggregate CheckFeeRate (glozow)
Pull request description:
Permit (restricted topology) submitpackage RPC outside of regtest. Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26933#issuecomment-1510851570
This RPC should be safe but still experimental - interface may change, not all features (e.g. package RBF) are implemented, etc. If a miner wants to expose this to people, they can effectively use "package relay" before the p2p changes are implemented. However, please note **this is not package relay**; transactions submitted this way will not relay to other nodes if the feerates are below their mempool min fee. Users should put this behind some kind of rate limit or permissions.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 5b878be742dbfcd232d949d2df1fff4743aec3d8
achow101:
ACK 5b878be742dbfcd232d949d2df1fff4743aec3d8
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 5b878be742dbfcd232d949d2df1fff4743aec3d8
ajtowns:
ACK 5b878be742dbfcd232d949d2df1fff4743aec3d8
ariard:
Code Review ACK 5b878be742. Though didn’t manually test the PR.
Tree-SHA512: 610365c0b2ffcccd55dedd1151879c82de1027e3319712bcb11d54f2467afaae4d05dca5f4b25f03354c80845fef538d3938b958174dda8b14c10670537a6524
|
|
-deprecatedrpc=create_bdb
fa071aeb61dcc42cd122d3fb1abe4b9c238f8010 wallet: No BDB creation, unless -deprecatedrpc=create_bdb (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
With BDB being removed soon, it seems confusing and harmful to allow users to create fresh BDB wallets going forward, as it would load them with an additional burden of having to migrate them soon after.
Also, it would be good to allow for one release for test (and external) scripts to adapt.
Fix all issues by introducing the `-deprecatedrpc=create_bdb` setting.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK fa071aeb61dcc42cd122d3fb1abe4b9c238f8010
achow101:
ACK fa071aeb61dcc42cd122d3fb1abe4b9c238f8010
furszy:
utACK fa071aeb
Tree-SHA512: 37a4c3e4ba659e0ebe2382e71d9c80e42a895d9ad743f5dda7c110fbbb7d2a36f46769982552a9ac0c3a57203379ef164be97aa8033eb7674d6b4da030ba8f9b
|
|
a list of chainstates
a9ef702a877a964bac724a56e2c0b5bee4ea7586 assumeutxo: change getchainstates RPC to return a list of chainstates (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Current `getchainstates` RPC returns "normal" and "snapshot" fields which are not ideal because it requires new "normal" and "snapshot" terms to be defined, and the definitions are not really consistent with internal code. (In the RPC interface, the "snapshot" chainstate becomes the "normal" chainstate after it is validated, while in internal code there is no "normal chainstate" and the "snapshot chainstate" is still called that temporarily after it is validated).
The current `getchainstates` RPC is also awkward to use if you to want information about the most-work chainstate, because you have to look at the "snapshot" field if it exists, and otherwise fall back to the "normal" field.
Fix these issues by having `getchainstates` just return a flat list of chainstates ordered by work, and adding a new chainstate "validated" field alongside the existing "snapshot_blockhash" field so it is explicit if a chainstate was originally loaded from a snapshot, and whether the snapshot has been validated.
This change was motivated by comment thread in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28562#discussion_r1344154808
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK a9ef702a877a964bac724a56e2c0b5bee4ea7586
jamesob:
re-ACK a9ef702
achow101:
ACK a9ef702a877a964bac724a56e2c0b5bee4ea7586
Tree-SHA512: b364e2e96675fb7beaaee60c4dff4b69e6bc2d8a30dea1ba094265633d1cddf9dbf1c5ce20c07d6e23222cf1e92a195acf6227e4901f3962e81a1e53a43490aa
|
|
c1e6c542af6d89a499e2a65465865aec651c4d67 descriptors: disallow hybrid public keys (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Fixes #28511
The descriptor documentation (`doc/descriptors.md`) and [BIP380](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0380.mediawiki) explicitly require that hex-encoded public keys start with 02 or 03 (compressed) or 04 (uncompressed). However, the current parsing/inference code permit 06 and 07 (hybrid) encoding as well. Fix this.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK c1e6c542af6d89a499e2a65465865aec651c4d67
achow101:
ACK c1e6c542af6d89a499e2a65465865aec651c4d67
Tree-SHA512: 23b674fb420619b2536d12da10008bb87cf7bc0333ec59e618c0d02c3574b468cc71248475ece37f76658d743ef51e68566948e903bca79fda5f7d75416fea4d
|
|
|
|
Current getchainstates RPC returns "normal" and "snapshot" fields which are not
ideal because it requires new "normal" and "snapshot" terms to be defined, and
the definitions are not really consistent with internal code. (In the RPC
interface, the "snapshot" chainstate becomes the "normal" chainstate after it
is validated, while in internal code there is no "normal chainstate" and the
"snapshot chainstate" is still called that temporarily after it is validated).
The current getchainstatees RPC is also awkward to use if you to want
information about the most-work chainstate because you have to look at the
"snapshot" field if it exists, and otherwise fall back to the "normal" field.
Fix these issues by having getchainstates just return a flat list of
chainstates ordered by work, and adding new chainstate "validated" field
alongside the existing "snapshot_blockhash" so it is explicit if a chainstate
was originally loaded from a snapshot, and whether the snapshot has been
validated.
|
|
It need not be in the `net` module and we need to call it from
`LookupSubNet()`, thus move it to `netbase`.
|
|
`vfLimited`, `IsReachable()`, `SetReachable()` need not be in the `net`
module. Move them to `netbase` because they will be needed in
`LookupSubNet()` to possibly flip the result to CJDNS (if that network
is reachable).
In the process, encapsulate them in a class.
`NET_UNROUTABLE` and `NET_INTERNAL` are no longer ignored when adding
or removing reachable networks. This was unnecessary.
|
|
The fuzz testing framework runs as if `-cjdnsreachable` is set and in
this case addresses like `{net=IPv6, addr=fc...}` are not possible.
|
|
|
|
4cafe9f176e93ebb6c38abb12140e8d8be005cbf [test] Make PeerManager's rng deterministic in tests (dergoegge)
fecec3e1c661ba273470ecc5ef12d4c070b53050 [net processing] FeeFilterRounder doesn't own a FastRandomContext (dergoegge)
47520ed209d9341702a0fb6006bee6f63f7da42e [net processing] Make fee filter rounder non-global (dergoegge)
77506f4ac6b3a3d7396a3a6101345019e05b3b10 [net processing] Addr shuffle uses PeerManager's rng (dergoegge)
a648dd79e5ebfdb627d0221b1207862efb664dfc [net processing] PushAddress uses PeerManager's rng (dergoegge)
87c706713e5d1c78bad943a42bf7c69047d28ea5 [net processing] PeerManager holds a FastRandomContext (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
This lets us avoid some non-determinism in tests (also see #28537).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 4cafe9f176e93ebb6c38abb12140e8d8be005cbf 🕗
glozow:
concept && light code review ACK 4cafe9f176e93ebb6c38abb12140e8d8be005cbf
Tree-SHA512: 3c18700773d0bc547ccb6442c41567e6f26b0b50fab5b79620da417ec91b9c0ae1395d15258da3aa4a91447b8ce560145dd135e39fbbd0610749e528e665b111
|
|
From https://geti2p.net/en/docs/api/samv3:
If SILENT=false was passed, which is the default value, the SAM bridge
sends the client a ASCII line containing the base64 public destination
key of the requesting peer
So, `Accept()` is supposed to receive a Base64 encoded destination of
the connecting peer, but if it receives something like this instead:
STREAM STATUS RESULT=I2P_ERROR MESSAGE="Session was closed"
then destroy the session.
|
|
Background:
`Listen()` does:
* if the session is not created yet
* create the control socket and on it:
* `HELLO`
* `SESSION CREATE ID=sessid`
* leave the control socked opened
* create a new socket and on it:
* `HELLO`
* `STREAM ACCEPT ID=sessid`
* read reply (`STREAM STATUS`)
Then a wait starts, for a peer to connect. When connected,
`Accept()` does:
* on the socket from `STREAM ACCEPT` from `Listen()`: read the
Base64 identification of the connecting peer
Problem:
The I2P router may be in such a state that this happens in a quick
succession (many times per second, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22759#issuecomment-1609907115):
`Listen()`-succeeds, `Accept()`-fails.
`Accept()` fails because the I2P router sends something that is
not Base64 on the socket:
STREAM STATUS RESULT=I2P_ERROR MESSAGE="Session was closed"
We only sleep after failed `Listen()` because the assumption was that
if `Accept()` fails then the next `Listen()` will also fail.
Solution:
Avoid filling the log with "Error accepting:" messages and sleep also
after a failed `Accept()`.
Extra changes:
* Reset the error waiting time after one successful connection.
Otherwise the timer will remain high due to problems that have
vanished long time ago.
* Increment the wait time less aggressively.
|
|
|
|
|
