Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Overloading sleep_for is not needed, as
* seconds and minutes can be converted to milliseconds by the compiler,
not needing a duration_cast
* std::condition_variable::wait_for will convert milliseconds to the
duration type of the underlying clock
So simply expose the clock.
|
|
This variable is only used in a single thread, so no atomic or mutex is
necessary to guard it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07f2c25d04c39a0074e1d9ee1b24b3e359c8153f refactor: add most of src/util to iwyu (fanquake)
Pull request description:
These files change infrequently, and not much header shuffling is required.
We don't add everything in src/util/ yet, because IWYU makes some
dubious suggestions, which I'm going to follow up with upstream.
Soon we'll swap `src/util/xyz.cpp` for just `src/util/`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 07f2c25d04c39a0074e1d9ee1b24b3e359c8153f, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 07d76435c2bff1a62c4967eb0efaafe619cc3bbaf4166741d8520927b24336c01aee59822f8082ee2a01e15046a0f5d506b4b23a6e40ceb750f3226ed8167847
|
|
invalid input test coverage
2ef5294a5bb68ceb3797d2638567a172cc21699f rpc: add RPCTypeCheck for getblockfrompeer inputs (Jon Atack)
734b9669ff7b2f5e2820993443a6f868f6b0b20a test: add getblockfrompeer coverage of invalid inputs (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
The new getblockfrompeer RPC lacks test coverage for invalid arguments, and its error messages are not harmonized with the existing RPCs.
Fix all issues.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
ACK 2ef5294a5bb68ceb3797d2638567a172cc21699f
Tree-SHA512: 454782cf6a44fd0e05483bb152153667ef5c8021358385ddcf89724fbbbd35e187362bdff757e00c99319527bc4c0b20c7187f67241d4585d767a29787142f25
|
|
use `Ticks(Dur2 d)`
c6c35db0571c2f2bdd34febbfe9acd52a42d7b95 wallet: change `ScanForWalletTransactions` to use `Ticks()` (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR changes `ScanForWalletTransactions()` to use the `Ticks(Dur2 d)` function (introduced in #25456).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK c6c35db0571c2f2bdd34febbfe9acd52a42d7b95
Tree-SHA512: 864e136b470baf22293dc03ae3400bbb34955389a1efc83862f006cfac84da9128c3a201ef051606c06f782a1fde84129261dd4b417cbfff854d5c359a92703e
|
|
fa4be8e7c324835d3b9eecb5a3825a4c8f77fb2f move-only: InitializeNode to handshake helper (MacroFake)
fa7098947ceff1964812d430e769af6d1ad561bd move-only: Version handshake to libtest_util (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
The version handshake after setting up a peer is an integral part of (unit) testing net processing logic.
Thus, make the helper accessible in libtest_util.
Also, remove the peerman argument from `FillNode`, as it must be equal to connman's peerman, which can then be used instead.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK fa4be8e7c324835d3b9eecb5a3825a4c8f77fb2f
Tree-SHA512: 8296399dc2c29196bd56584c9b61f1c5a088f96dd3438b07b84e1acf525d867f1e37fdfdeede8a831add25848cda0c221ce3fb873e5ae5ca805a1765aa08eb12
|
|
|
|
connect it to CreateTransaction and GetNewDestination
111ea3ab711414236f8678566a7884d48619b2d8 wallet: refactor GetNewDestination, use BResult (furszy)
22351725bc4c5eb63ee45f607374bbf2d76e2b8c send: refactor CreateTransaction flow to return a BResult<CTransactionRef> (furszy)
198fcca162f4d2f877feab485e629ff89818ff56 wallet: refactor, include 'FeeCalculation' inside 'CreatedTransactionResult' (furszy)
7a45c33d1f8a758850cf8e7bd6ad508939ba5c0d Introduce generic 'Result' class (furszy)
Pull request description:
Based on a common function signature pattern that we have all around the sources:
```cpp
bool doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, &result_obj, &error_string) {
// do something...
if (error) {
error_string = "something bad happened";
return false;
}
result = goodResult;
return true;
}
```
Introduced a generic class `BResult` that encapsulate the function boolean result, the result object (in case of having it) and, in case of failure, the string error reason.
Obtaining in this way cleaner function signatures and removing boilerplate code:
```cpp
BResult<Obj> doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4) {
// do something...
if (error) return "something bad happened";
return goodResult;
}
```
Same cleanup applies equally to the function callers' side as well. There is no longer need to add the error string and the result object declarations before calling the function:
Before:
```cpp
Obj result_obj;
std::string error_string;
if (!doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, result_obj, error_string)) {
LogPrintf("Error: %s", error_string);
}
return result_obj;
```
Now:
```cpp
BResult<Obj> op_res = doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4);
if (!op_res) {
LogPrintf("Error: %s", op_res.GetError());
}
return op_res.GetObjResult();
```
### Initial Implementation:
Have connected this new concept to two different flows for now:
1) The `CreateTransaction` flow. --> 7ba2b87c
2) The `GetNewDestination` flow. --> bcee0912
Happy note: even when introduced a new class into the sources, the amount of lines removed is almost equal to added ones :).
Extra note: this work is an extended version (and a decoupling) of the work that is inside #24845 (which does not contain the `GetNewDestination` changes nor the inclusion of the `FeeCalculation` field inside `CreatedTransactionResult`).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 111ea3ab711414236f8678566a7884d48619b2d8
w0xlt:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25218/commits/111ea3ab711414236f8678566a7884d48619b2d8
theStack:
re-ACK 111ea3ab711414236f8678566a7884d48619b2d8
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 111ea3ab711414236f8678566a7884d48619b2d8 🎏
Tree-SHA512: 6d84d901a4cb923727067f25ff64542a40edd1ea84fdeac092312ac684c34e3688a52ac5eb012717d2b73f4cb742b9d78e458eb0e9cb9d6d72a916395be91f69
|
|
confirmation dialog
d5c141f221d67aaeee989da0db0ac5383d7562d3 qt: apply translator comments to reset options confirmation dialog (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This is a followup to #617. Because the strings were being concatenated, we can not apply translator comments to all of the revelant strings. This can be tested by applying the following diff to current master and running `make translate`; then check the resulting diff:
```diff
diff --git a/src/qt/optionsdialog.cpp b/src/qt/optionsdialog.cpp
index 462b923d6..3cf165004 100644
--- a/src/qt/optionsdialog.cpp
+++ b/src/qt/optionsdialog.cpp
@@ -286,9 +286,17 @@ void OptionsDialog::on_resetButton_clicked()
{
if (model) {
// confirmation dialog
+ //: Window title text of pop-up window shown when the user has chosen to reset options.
QMessageBox::StandardButton btnRetVal = QMessageBox::question(this, tr("Confirm options reset"),
+ /*: Text explaining that the settings the user changed will not come
+ into effect until the client is restarted. */
tr("Client restart required to activate changes.") + "<br><br>" +
+ /*: Text explaining to the user that the client's current settings
+ will be backed up at a specific location. %1 is a stand-in
+ argument for the backup location's path. */
tr("Current settings will be backed up at \"%1\".").arg(m_client_model->dataDir()) + "<br><br>" +
+ /*: Text asking the user to confirm if they would like to proceed
+ with a client shutdown. */
tr("Client will be shut down. Do you want to proceed?"),
QMessageBox::Yes | QMessageBox::Cancel, QMessageBox::Cancel);
```
To apply the above translator comments, what we want to do instead is have a variable in which the translatable strings are appended to using the [QString append function](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qstring.html#append).
When you run `make translate` with this PR, you will see the translator comments properly applied, as shown below:
``` diff
diff --git a/src/qt/locale/bitcoin_en.ts b/src/qt/locale/bitcoin_en.ts
index 35d820187..9e5158b3e 100644
--- a/src/qt/locale/bitcoin_en.ts
+++ b/src/qt/locale/bitcoin_en.ts
@@ -1942,28 +1942,37 @@ Signing is only possible with addresses of the type 'legacy'.</source>
<translation>default</translation>
</message>
<message>
- <location line="+81"/>
+ <location line="+86"/>
<source>none</source>
<translation type="unfinished"></translation>
</message>
<message>
- <location line="+97"/>
+ <location line="+107"/>
<source>Confirm options reset</source>
+ <extracomment>Window title text of pop-up window shown when the user has chosen to reset options.</extracomment>
<translation>Confirm options reset</translation>
</message>
<message>
- <location line="+1"/>
- <location line="+70"/>
+ <location line="-9"/>
+ <location line="+79"/>
<source>Client restart required to activate changes.</source>
+ <extracomment>Text explaining that the settings changed will not come into effect until the client is restarted.</extracomment>
+ <translation type="unfinished"></translation>
+ </message>
+ <message>
+ <location line="-75"/>
+ <source>Current settings will be backed up at "%1".</source>
+ <extracomment>Text explaining to the user that the client's current settings will be backed up at a specific location. %1 is a stand-in argument for the backup location's path.</extracomment>
<translation type="unfinished"></translation>
</message>
<message>
- <location line="-70"/>
+ <location line="+3"/>
<source>Client will be shut down. Do you want to proceed?</source>
+ <extracomment>Text asking the user to confirm if they would like to proceed with a client shutdown.</extracomment>
<translation type="unfinished"></translation>
</message>
<message>
- <location line="+18"/>
+ <location line="+20"/>
<source>Configuration options</source>
<extracomment>Window title text of pop-up box that allows opening up of configuration file.</extracomment>
<translation type="unfinished"></translation>
```
No difference in rendering between master and PR
| master | PR |
| ------- | --- |
<img width="532" alt="Screen Shot 2022-06-29 at 11 39 17 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/176588495-9d3761b6-9d96-489a-bbe5-a8907f7d5f99.png"> | <img width="532" alt="Screen Shot 2022-06-29 at 11 39 51 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/176588513-92e29564-b74a-46f5-a5dd-469c4ee953f7.png"> |
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK d5c141f221d67aaeee989da0db0ac5383d7562d3
furszy:
Tested ACK d5c141f2, no functional changes.
w0xlt:
tACK https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/627/commits/d5c141f221d67aaeee989da0db0ac5383d7562d3
Tree-SHA512: 6175a096c6f99edb3041cc2429e1ea0670a10cd2cab0364f664a56c7dee1aa8631d52c0a36edb5d571f6ef934e947d45017e446cea7dddae044085c39c8835ef
|
|
|
|
|
|
230a2f4cc3fab9f66b6c24ba809ddbea77755cb7 wallet test: Add unit test for wallet scan save_progress option (Ryan Ofsky)
a89ddfbe22b6db5beda678c9493e08fec6144122 wallet: Save wallet scan progress (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
Currently, the wallet scan progress is not saved.
If it is interrupted, it will be necessary to start from scratch on the next load.
This PR changes this and the progress is saved right after checking a block.
Close https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25010
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
re-ACK 230a2f4
achow101:
ACK 230a2f4cc3fab9f66b6c24ba809ddbea77755cb7
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 230a2f4cc3fab9f66b6c24ba809ddbea77755cb7. Only change since last review is tweaking whitespace and adding log print
Tree-SHA512: 1a9dec207ed22b3443fb06a4daf967637bc02bcaf71c070b7dc33605d0cab959551e4014c9e92293a63f54c5cbcc98bb9f8844a8c60bc32a1482b1c4130fab32
|
|
If we are given a PSBT that is missing one or more input UTXOs, our
PrecomputedTransactionData will be incorrect and missing information
that it should otherwise have, and therefore we may not produce a
signature when we should. To avoid this problem, we can do the
precomputation after we have set the UTXOs the wallet is able to set for
the PSBT.
Also adds a test for this behavior.
|
|
selection
98ea43d5e9fc7b001f55a5bb1602afc2661cdb0f test: add tests for negative waste during coin selection (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
#25495 mentions that waste can be negative when the current feerate is less than the long term feerate. There are currently no waste tests for negative waste, so this PR adds two of them.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 98ea43d5e9fc7b001f55a5bb1602afc2661cdb0f
glozow:
light code review ACK 98ea43d5e9fc7b001f55a5bb1602afc2661cdb0f, good to have tests for negative waste
Tree-SHA512: d194d370f1257975959d3c601fea9f82c30c1aabc3e8bedc997c62659283fe681cc527e59df1a0187b3c91e8067c60374dd5ce0237561bd882edafe6a575a9b9
|
|
bc13ec888cdc2791f79eeb6eb76b9134d670043e doc: Add a release note about the "restore wallet" menu item (w0xlt)
e7a3f698b5f3f7dde8632c4911abd4e5bc1f06cb gui: Add Wallet Restore in the GUI (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a menu item to restore a wallet from a backup file in the GUI.
Currently this option exists only in RPC interface.
Motivation: It makes easier for non-technical users to restore backups.
Master | PR |
--- | ---
<img width="307" alt="master" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/94266259/141673349-0bf8a237-ecec-42e4-a0d7-1d5863940036.png"> | <img width="307" alt="pr" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/94266259/141673350-972dea23-ae56-4283-a365-819da62b7067.png"> |
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
Added a release note in a new commit (https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/471/commits/bc13ec888cdc2791f79eeb6eb76b9134d670043e) to not invalidate the ACKs for the previous one.
furszy:
utACK bc13ec8
shaavan:
ACK bc13ec888cdc2791f79eeb6eb76b9134d670043e
hebasto:
ACK bc13ec888cdc2791f79eeb6eb76b9134d670043e
Tree-SHA512: edc3675484238857b77e74382a4041dd5d2cbcda1e2d5bfe52c83d9d7bb7be8a243ecd97e25e994d8c30ab6d7c59ead5a1c953a46dce173666b137eeffc3c94f
|
|
d54c5c8b1b1a38b5b38e6878aea0fa8d6c1ad7e9 wallet: use CCoinControl to estimate signature size (S3RK)
a94659c84ee10ac5915eb5a6b654435183d88521 wallet: replace GetTxSpendSize with CalculateMaximumSignedInputSize (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Currently `DummySignTx` and `DummySignInput` use different ways to determine signature size.
This PR unifies the way wallet estimates signature size for various inputs.
Instead of passing boolean flags from calling code the `use_max_sig` is now calculated at the place of signature creation using information available in `CCoinControl`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d54c5c8b1b1a38b5b38e6878aea0fa8d6c1ad7e9
theStack:
Code-review ACK d54c5c8b1b1a38b5b38e6878aea0fa8d6c1ad7e9
Tree-SHA512: e790903ad4683067070aa7dbf7434a1bd142282a5bc425112e64d88d27559f1a2cd60c68d6022feaf6b845237035cb18ece10f6243d719ba28173b69bd99110a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful to encapsulate the function result object (in case of having it) or, in case of failure, the failure reason.
This let us clean lot of boilerplate code, as now instead of returning a boolean and having to add a ref arg for the
return object and another ref for the error string. We can simply return a 'BResult<Obj>'.
Example of what we currently have:
```
bool doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, &result, &error_string) {
do something...
if (error) {
error_string = "something bad happened";
return false;
}
result = goodResult;
return true;
}
```
Example of what we will get with this commit:
```
BResult<Obj> doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4) {
do something...
if (error) return {"something happened"};
// good
return {goodResult};
}
```
This allows a similar boilerplate cleanup on the function callers side as well. They don't have to add the extra
pre-function-call error string and result object declarations to pass the references to the function.
|
|
d69045e291e32e02d105d1b5ff1c8b86db0ae69e test: add coverage for 'listreceivedbyaddress' no change addrs return (furszy)
324f00a6420bbd64c67c264e50632e6fa36ae732 refactor: 'ListReceived' use optional for filtered address (furszy)
b459fc122feace9e9a738c48aab21961cf15dddc refactor: RPC 'ListReceived', encapsulate m_address_book access (furszy)
fa9f2ab8fd53075d2a3ec93ddac4908e73525c46 refactor: RPC 'listlabels', encapsulate 'CWallet::ListAddrBookLabels' functionality (furszy)
83e42c4b94e376a19d3eb0a2379769b8b8ac5fc8 refactor: use 'ForEachAddrBookEntry' in RPC 'getaddressesbylabel' (furszy)
2b48642499016cb357e4bcec32481cd50361194e refactor: use ForEachAddrBookEntry in interfaces::getAddresses (furszy)
032842ae4196aaed5ea3567ea01a61ed75ab2edd wallet: implement ForEachAddrBookEntry method (furszy)
09649bc95d5f2855a54a8cf02e65215a3b333c92 refactor: implement general 'ListAddrBookAddresses' for addressbook destinations lookup (furszy)
192eb1e61c3c43baec7f32c498ab0ce0656a58f7 refactor: getAddress don't access m_address_book, use FindAddressEntry function (furszy)
Pull request description:
### Context
The wallet's `m_address_book` field is being accessed directly from several places across the sources.
### Problem
Code structure wise, we shouldn't be accessing it directly. It could end up being modified by mistake (from a place that has nothing to do with the wallet like an RPC command or the GUI) and cause a bigger issue: like an address book entry 'purpose' string change, which if done badly (from 'send' to 'receive'), could end up in a user sharing a "receive" address that he/she doesn't own.
### Solution
Encapsulate `m_address_book` access inside the wallet.
-------------------------------------------------------
Extra Note:
This is the initial step towards decoupling the address book functionality from the wallet's sources. In other words, the creation of the `AddressBookManager` (which will be coming in a follow-up PR).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d69045e291e32e02d105d1b5ff1c8b86db0ae69e
theStack:
ACK d69045e291e32e02d105d1b5ff1c8b86db0ae69e ✅
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25337/commits/d69045e291e32e02d105d1b5ff1c8b86db0ae69e
Tree-SHA512: dba17acd86f171b4e9af0223bbbcad380048570f6a2f6a92732a51f01abe8806debaf65c9e9e5569fa76a541903cbb50adcb5f56ef77858151c698ae6b218e2a
|
|
These files change infrequently, and not much header shuffling is required.
We don't add everything in src/util/ yet, because IWYU makes some
dubious suggestions, which I'm going to follow up with upstream.
|
|
4c9666bd73645b94ae81be1faf7a0b8237dd6e99 Mention `mempoolfullrbf` in policy/mempool-replacements.md (Antoine Riard)
aae66ab43d794bdfaa2dade91760cc55861c9693 Update getmempoolinfo RPC with `mempoolfullrbf` (Antoine Riard)
3e27e317270fdc2dd02794fea9da016387699636 Introduce `mempoolfullrbf` node setting. (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
This is ready for review.
Recent discussions among LN devs have brought back on the surface concerns about the security of multi-party funded transactions against pinnings attacks and other mempool-based nuisances. The lack of full-rbf transaction-relay topology connected to miners open the way to cheap and naive DoS against multi-party funded transactions (e.g coinjoins, dual-funded channels, on-chain DLCs, ...) without solutions introducing an overhead cost or centralization vectors afaik . For more details, see [0].
This PR implements a simple `fullrbf` setting, where the node always allows transaction replacement, ignoring BIP125 opt-in flag. The default value of the setting stays **false**, therefore opt-in replacement is still the default Bitcoin Core replacement policy. Contrary to a previous proposal of mine and listening to feedbacks collected since then [1], I think this new setting simply offers more flexibility in a node transaction-relay policy suiting one's application requirements, without arguing a change of the default behavior.
I [posted](https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-June/020557.html) on the ML to invite operators with a bitcoin application sensitive to full-rbf (e.g dual-funded LN channels service providers) or mempool researchers to join a bootstrapped full-rbf activated peers network for experimentation and learning. If people have strong opinions against the existence of such full-rbf transaction-relay network, I'm proposing to express them on the future thread.
[0] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2021-May/003033.html
[1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-June/019074.html
Follow-up suggestions :
- soft-enable opt-in RBF in the wallet : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25353#issuecomment-1154918789
- p2p discovery and additional outbound connection to full-rbf peers : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25353#issuecomment-1156044401
- match the code between RPC, wallet and mempool about disregard of inherited signaling : #22698
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25353/commits/4c9666bd73645b94ae81be1faf7a0b8237dd6e99
glozow:
ACK 4c9666bd73645b94ae81be1faf7a0b8237dd6e99, a few nits which are non-blocking.
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25353/commits/4c9666bd73645b94ae81be1faf7a0b8237dd6e99
Tree-SHA512: 9e288bf22e06a9808804e58178444ef1830c3fdd42fd8a7cd7ffb101f8f586e08b000679be407d63ca76a56f7216227b368ff630c81f3fac3243db1a1202ab1c
|
|
|
|
This change eliminates memory usage spike when compiling with Visual
Studio 2022 (at least in Cirrus CI environment).
Easy to review using
`git diff --color-moved-ws=allow-indentation-change --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
|
|
This change eliminates memory usage spike when compiling with Visual
Studio 2022 (at least in Cirrus CI environment).
Easy to review using
`git diff --color-moved-ws=allow-indentation-change --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
|
|
This change eliminates memory usage spike when compiling with Visual
Studio 2022 (at least in Cirrus CI environment).
Easy to review using
`git diff --color-moved-ws=allow-indentation-change --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
|
|
reading the filter from disk.
e734228d8585c0870c71ce8ba8c037f8cf8b249a Update GCSFilter benchmarks (Calvin Kim)
aee9a8140b3a58b744766f9e89572f1d953a808b Add GCSFilterDecodeSkipCheck benchmark (Patrick Strateman)
299023c1d9962628d158fac0306f8531506a0123 Add GCSFilterDecode and GCSBlockFilterGetHash benchmarks. (Patrick Strateman)
b0a53d50d9142bed51a8372eeb848816bfa94da8 Make sanity check in GCSFilter constructor optional (Patrick Strateman)
Pull request description:
This PR picks up the abandoned #19280
BlockFilterIndex was depending on `GolombRiceDecode()` during the filter decode to sanity check that the filter wasn't corrupt. However, we can check for corruption by ensuring that the encoded blockfilter's hash matches up with the one stored in the index database.
Benchmarks that were added in #19280 showed that checking the hash is much faster.
The benchmarks were changed to nanobench and the relevant benchmarks were like below, showing a clear win for the hash check method.
```
| ns/elem | elem/s | err% | ins/elem | bra/elem | miss% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 531.40 | 1,881,819.43 | 0.3% | 3,527.01 | 411.00 | 0.2% | 0.01 | `DecodeCheckedGCSFilter`
| 258,220.50 | 3,872.66 | 0.1% | 2,990,092.00 | 586,706.00 | 1.7% | 0.01 | `DecodeGCSFilter`
| 13,036.77 | 76,706.09 | 0.3% | 64,238.24 | 513.04 | 0.2% | 0.01 | `BlockFilterGetHash`
```
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK e734228d8585c0870c71ce8ba8c037f8cf8b249a
theStack:
Code-review ACK e734228d8585c0870c71ce8ba8c037f8cf8b249a
stickies-v:
ACK e734228d8585c0870c71ce8ba8c037f8cf8b249a
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK e734228d8585c0870c71ce8ba8c037f8cf8b249a, with caveat that I mostly paid attention to the main code, not the changes to the benchmark. Only changes since last review were changes to the benchmark code.
Tree-SHA512: 02b86eab7b554e1a57a15b17a4d6d71faa91b556c637b0da29f0c9ee76597a110be8e3b4d0c158d4cab04af0623de18b764837be0ec2a72afcfe1ad9c78a83c6
|
|
own translation unit
0101d2bc3c3bcf698d6cc2a237a680fc52395987 [net] Move eviction logic to its own file (dergoegge)
c741d748d4d9836940b99091cc7be09c65efcb79 [net] Move ConnectionType to its own file (Cory Fields)
a3c27070396ab8c2941c437e8099547e8fc9c110 [net] Add connection type to NodeEvictionCandidate (dergoegge)
42aa5d5b6269d27af525d5001907558442e96023 [net] Add NoBan status to NodeEvictionCandidate (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
This PR splits of the first couple commits from #25268 that move the inbound eviction logic from `net.{h,cpp}` to `eviction.{h,cpp}`.
Please look at #25268 for motivation and conceptual review.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 0101d2bc3c3bcf698d6cc2a237a680fc52395987
theuni:
utACK 0101d2bc3c3bcf698d6cc2a237a680fc52395987. I quickly verified with `git --color-moved` that the move-only changes are indeed move-only.
Tree-SHA512: e0c345a698030e049cb22fe281b44503c04403c5be5a3750ca14bfcc603a162ac6bac9a39552472feb57c460102b7ca91430b8ad6268f2efccc49b5e8959331b
|
|
6eb0909cb7d5883a258f76ad6cf2c989fc6f892f fuzz: add low-level target for txorphanage (chinggg)
Pull request description:
This adds a low-level fuzz target for orphan transaction handling by creating random transactions and calling all functions in `TxOrphanage`.
It cannot simulate real-world `orphan/unorphan` scenarios effectively since it does not maintain any state about the node and the chain. A high-level fuzz target which construct well-designed transaction graphs will be added later.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 6eb0909cb7d5883a258f76ad6cf2c989fc6f892f 🐈
Tree-SHA512: b4d64f5941df77d13981f75ec170cef6ffabe782797c982ede7f34134be01dc0026dd7c0bee614bc1d64715e90a933d2a8c95974d402e32eaba8e24cc928299e
|
|
|
|
|
|
This new node policy setting enables to accept replaced-by-fee
transaction without inspection of the replaceability signaling
as described in BIP125 "explicit signaling".
If turns on, the node mempool accepts transaction replacement
as described in `policy/mempool-replacements.md`.
The default setting value is `false`, implying opt-in RBF
is enforced.
|
|
Instead of duplicate the exact same code twice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
subtracting fees from output
140d942634f9f1bba191aafa948df57812c0f3fe wallet: don't add change fee to target if subtracting fees from output (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Change fee is payed by the recipient, so we don't need to add it to our target for coin selection.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 140d942634f9f1bba191aafa948df57812c0f3fe
ishaanam:
ACK 140d942634f9f1bba191aafa948df57812c0f3fe
furszy:
Code review ACK 140d9426
Tree-SHA512: b5efd0264c47ecee9204a3fd039bad24c69f9e614c6e1d9bb240ee5be6356b175aa074f3be123e6cfb8becd4d7bd1028eebe18801662cc69d19413d8d5a9dd5c
|
|
|
|
If readlink returns the size of the buffer, an overflow may have (safely) occurred.
Pass a buffer size of MAX_PATH+1 (the size of the actual buffer) to detect this scenario.
|
|
Instead of calling GetCachableAmount twice, which will result in
iterating through all the transaction txins/txouts and calling
GetDebit/GetCredit (which lock cs_wallet), just merge the filters and do
it once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
flight to the same peer
99f4785cad94657dcf349d00fdd6f1d44cac9bb0 Replace GetTime() with NodeClock in MaybeSendGetHeaders() (Suhas Daftuar)
abf5d16c24cb08b0451bdbd4d1de63a12930e8f5 Don't send getheaders message when another request is outstanding (Suhas Daftuar)
ffe87db247b19ffb8bfba329c5dd0be39ef5a53f Cleanup received_new_header calculation to use WITH_LOCK (Suhas Daftuar)
6d95cd3e7444ebaaabb64a76783ea3551530f1d7 Move peer state updates from headers message into separate function (Suhas Daftuar)
2b341db731793844f12944363186edea23eabdeb Move headers direct fetch to end of ProcessHeadersMessage (Suhas Daftuar)
29c45185223441943ab610e62937a118c7c3a5b2 Move headers-direct-fetch logic into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
bf8ea6df75749c27f753b562c4724b3f8d263ad4 Move additional headers fetching to own function (Suhas Daftuar)
9492e93bf9f4a841bf43ca4b593871c0863d5b63 Add helper function for checking header continuity (Suhas Daftuar)
7f2450871b3ea0b4d02d56bd2ca365fcc25cf90e Move handling of unconnecting headers into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Change `getheaders` messages so that we wait up to 2 minutes for a response to a prior `getheaders` message before issuing a new one.
Also change the handling of the `getheaders` message sent in response to a block INV, so that we no longer use the hashstop variable (including the hash stop will just mean that if our peer's headers chain is longer, then we won't learn
it, so there's no benefit to using hashstop).
Also, now respond to a `getheaders` during IBD with an empty headers message (rather than nothing) -- this better conforms to the intent of the new logic that it's better to not ignore a peer's `getheaders` message, even if you have nothing to give. This also avoids a lot of functional tests breaking.
This PR also reworks the headers processing logic to make it more readable.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 99f4785cad94657dcf349d00fdd6f1d44cac9bb0 ; code review, check over new logic of when to send getheaders messages
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 99f4785cad94657dcf349d00fdd6f1d44cac9bb0
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 99f4785cad94657dcf349d00fdd6f1d44cac9bb0
sipa:
utACK 99f4785cad94657dcf349d00fdd6f1d44cac9bb0
w0xlt:
tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25454/commits/99f4785cad94657dcf349d00fdd6f1d44cac9bb0 Good improvement in the code.
Tree-SHA512: b8a63f6f71ac83e292edc0200def7835ad8b06b2955dd34e3ea6fac85980fa6962efd31d689ef5ea121ff5477ec14aafa4bbe2d0db134c05f4a31a57a8ced365
|
|
|