aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-12-01Merge #20207: Follow-up extra comments on taproot code and testsMarcoFalke
2d8099c713dfd4b546150fd53c2e4f364b9009f4 Mention units of MAX_STANDARD_ policy constants (Pieter Wuille) 84e29c7c0141b52044020ec0c5dfa8a462b7e97f Mention in validation that IsWitnessStandard tests for P2TR (Pieter Wuille) f867cbcc268a3bfaeef5510a7e40e6d3c0818b6d Clean up assets test minimizer LDFLAGS (Pieter Wuille) ea0e78677bdbe3313f594118c500cf7784c56970 Document additional IsWitnessStandard behavior (Pieter Wuille) 6040de9a46725826330cd63cdf76e2121a18e728 Add comments on CPubKey::IsValid (Pieter Wuille) 8dbb7de67ce0a71f5fc54289c0ff048ac8dd0acc Add comments to VerifyTaprootCommitment (Pieter Wuille) cdf900cbf26db05c7edb398ea645f1d23049d810 Document need_vin_vout_mismatch argument to make_spender (Pieter Wuille) 18246ed5f09dd078fa1410b7ec2ba4379cc5e032 Fix and improve taproot_construct comments (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: Addressing some review comments raised here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953#pullrequestreview-512238027 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953#pullrequestreview-513499921 ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK 2d8099c per `git range-diff 5009159 4f10965 2d8099c` ariard: ACK 2d8099c, only changes are comment light improvements on IsValid/IsWitnessStandard. Tree-SHA512: c4881546c379ea8efc7ef99a43cbf3b9cd3f9dde5fd97a07ee66f2b593c78aef0bd8784853c5c9c737b66c269241a1048bbbdd6c964a3d872efd8ba0ec410b68
2020-12-01Merge #20425: fuzz: Make CAddrMan fuzzing harness deterministicMarcoFalke
17a5f172fa9ec509b1c3f950ee8dfb6f025534d2 fuzz: Make addrman fuzzing harness deterministic (practicalswift) Pull request description: Make `CAddrMan` fuzzing harness deterministic. See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets). Happy fuzzing :) ACKs for top commit: Crypt-iQ: utACK 17a5f172fa9ec509b1c3f950ee8dfb6f025534d2 Tree-SHA512: 725f983745233e9b616782247fa18847e483c074ca4336a5beea8a9009128c3a74b4d50a12662d8ca2177c2e1fc5fc121834df6b459ac0af43c931d77ef7c4d8
2020-12-01Merge #20496: build: Drop unneeded macOS framework dependenciesJonas Schnelli
ec4a46dd9c158e1a0de144e9abb260da941aa702 build: Drop unneeded IOKit framework dependency (Hennadii Stepanov) 65afe4cb69e80278de0f584b6eeb6741f02a31eb build: Drop unneeded ApplicationServices framework dependency (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: Bitcoin Core codebase does not contain direct dependencies on the `ApplicationServices` and `IOKit` frameworks. ACKs for top commit: jonasschnelli: utACK ec4a46dd9c158e1a0de144e9abb260da941aa702 practicalswift: cr ACK ec4a46dd9c158e1a0de144e9abb260da941aa702: patch looks correct! promag: Tested ACK ec4a46dd9c158e1a0de144e9abb260da941aa702 (not depends build). Tree-SHA512: 47b5ad87d761992850133a921f07d485565c70ba2909a3289050f406e6dbd39ad49e1aeeb6cad79c6914385a72ddffd273dfadd69259a35545a13cd17d0e5043
2020-12-01Merge bitcoin-core/gui#137: refactor: Replace deprecated ↵Jonas Schnelli
Qt::SystemLocale{Short,Long}Date 86b1ab64b1a5b56518787ef16ea54ddbbc97d83e refactor: Replace deprecated Qt::SystemLocale{Short,Long}Date (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: As all deprecated warning in Qt 5.15.0 were eliminated in #46, Qt 5.15.1 introduced another one that is fixed in this PR. Required for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20182. Details in Qt docs: - https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qdatetime.html#toString-1 - https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qdate.html#toString-1 ACKs for top commit: jarolrod: Tested ACK 86b1ab6 on MacOS 10.15.7 and Arch Linux both with Qt 5.15.1 jonasschnelli: Tested ACK 86b1ab64b1a5b56518787ef16ea54ddbbc97d83e Tree-SHA512: 1dbba8ee70c895bf58317172a9901cdbe5503b1d6258f51caaae88d88d332d9fbd4697c995192d31e3618ddfd532c5f5881289b3af1184422e5a9263a1224115
2020-12-01Merge #20222: refactor: CTxMempool constructor clean upMarcoFalke
f15e780b9e57554c723bc02aa41150ecf3e3a8c9 refactor: Clean up CTxMemPool initializer list (Elle Mouton) e3310692d0e9720e960b9785274ce1f0b58b4cd7 refactor: Make CTxMemPool::m_check_ratio a const and a constructor argument (Elle Mouton) 9d4b4b2c2c49774523de740d6492ee5b1ee15e74 refactor: Avoid double to int cast for nCheckFrequency (Elle Mouton) Pull request description: This PR cleans up the CTxMemPool interface by including the ratio used to determine when a mempool sanity check should run in the constructor of CTxMempool instead of using nCheckFrequency which required a cast from a double to a uint32_t. Since nCheckFrequency (now called m_check_ratio) is set in the constructor and only every read from there after, it can be turned into a const and no longer needs to be guarded by the 'cs' lock. Since nCheckFrequency/m_check_ratio no longer needs to lock the 'cs' mutux, mutex lock line in the "CTxMempool::check" function can be moved below where the m_check_ratio variable is checked. Since the variable is 0 by default (meaning that "CTxMempool::check" will most likely not run its logic) this saves us from unnecessarily grabbing the lock. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK f15e780b9e57554c723bc02aa41150ecf3e3a8c9 MarcoFalke: ACK f15e780b9e57554c723bc02aa41150ecf3e3a8c9 👘 glozow: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20222/commits/f15e780b9e57554c723bc02aa41150ecf3e3a8c9 theStack: Code Review ACK f15e780b9e57554c723bc02aa41150ecf3e3a8c9 Tree-SHA512: d83f3b5311ca128847b621e5e999c7e1bf0f4e6261d4cc090fb13e229a0f7eecd66ad997f654f50a838baf708d1515740aa3bffc244909a001d01fd5ae398b68
2020-12-01Merge #20494: refactor: Move node and wallet code out of src/interfacesMarcoFalke
629a9299b2a7241a3fa7d597cb34abcbe1af9255 Move WalletImpl from interfaces/wallet.cpp to wallet/interfaces.cpp (Russell Yanofsky) 2a26771d8161d30be1853a35acfee588cce03634 Move ChainImpl from interfaces/chain.cpp to node/interfaces.cpp (Russell Yanofsky) 12bd0fc9d70333c54c83ebb08c734272dbd330c2 Move NodeImpl from interfaces/node.cpp to node/interfaces.cpp (Russell Yanofsky) Pull request description: This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). --- Move `NodeImpl` from `interfaces/node.cpp` to `node/interfaces.cpp` Move `ChainImpl` from `interfaces/chain.cpp` to `node/interfaces.cpp` Move `WalletImpl` from `interfaces/wallet.cpp` to `wallet/interfaces.cpp` No changes to any classes (can review with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`) Motivation for this change is to move node and wallet code to respective directories where it might fit in better than `src/interfaces/`, but also to remove all unnecessary code from `src/interfaces/` to unblock #19160 review, which has been hung up partially because of code organization. Building on top of this PR, #19160 should now be able to organize interface implementations more understandably in `src/node/` `src/wallet/` `src/ipc/` and `src/init/` directories instead of having so much functionality all in `src/interfaces/` ACKs for top commit: promag: Code review ACK 629a9299b2a7241a3fa7d597cb34abcbe1af9255. MarcoFalke: review ACK 629a9299b2a7241a3fa7d597cb34abcbe1af9255 🔺 Tree-SHA512: 87c2b8fd51519bbd4e5ad3539a79debcf88c3bf021eb28c63f3f555186538b62a0c4cc1a3f07cfb4ff13aea8b0b2fdde505d81f22a5e5fd12a6e375b55a92ab8
2020-12-01Merge #20519: Handle rename failure in DumpMempool(...) by using the ↵MarcoFalke
RenameOver(...) return value. Add [[nodiscard]] to RenameOver(...). ce9dd45422e1f4ecce6df68da086b8bfc2100756 Add [[nodiscard]] to RenameOver(...) (practicalswift) 9429a398e291a1b5edcfc657b94fcaf52cd1d8f9 Handle rename failure in DumpMempool(...) by using RenameOver(...) return value (practicalswift) Pull request description: Handle rename failure in `DumpMempool(...)` by using the `RenameOver(...)` return value. Add `[[nodiscard]]` to `RenameOver(...)` to reduce the risk of similar rename issues in the future. ACKs for top commit: vasild: ACK ce9dd454 theStack: ACK ce9dd45422e1f4ecce6df68da086b8bfc2100756 🏷️ Tree-SHA512: 1e63d7f3061e1f6ea2df5750dbc1547a39bd50b6c529812a0c8a0c11d3100c241afdf14094e69b69a38bade7e54a12b2a42888545874398eaf5d02421b57e874
2020-11-30Merge #20499: Remove obsolete NODISCARD ifdef forest. Use [[nodiscard]] (C++17).MarcoFalke
79bff8e48aca961ec271b0d592aca9278b981e2f Remove NODISCARD (practicalswift) 4848e711076c6ebc5d841feb83baeb6d2bc76c94 scripted-diff: Use [[nodiscard]] (C++17) instead of NODISCARD (practicalswift) Pull request description: Remove obsolete `NODISCARD` `ifdef` forest. Use `[[nodiscard]]` (C++17). ACKs for top commit: theStack: ACK 79bff8e48aca961ec271b0d592aca9278b981e2f fanquake: ACK 79bff8e48aca961ec271b0d592aca9278b981e2f Tree-SHA512: 56dbb8e50ed97ecfbce28cdc688a01146108acae49a943e338a8f983f7168914710d36e38632f6a7c200ba6c6ac35b2519e97d6c985e8e7eb23223f13bf985d6
2020-11-30Merge #20491: refactor: Drop noop gcc version checksfanquake
830ddf413934226d0b6ca99165916790cc52ca18 Drop noop gcc version checks (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: Since #20413 the minimum required GCC version is 7. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 830ddf413934226d0b6ca99165916790cc52ca18 Tree-SHA512: 36264661d6ced1683a0c907efba7c700502acaf8e9fd50d9066bc9c7b877b25165b0684c2d7fe74bd58e500a77d7702bdbdd53691c274f29e4abccd241c10964
2020-11-28Merge bitcoin-core/gui#138: unlock encrypted wallet "OK" button bugfixMarcoFalke
8008ef770f3d0b14d03e22371314500373732143 qt: unlock wallet "OK" button bugfix (Michael Dietz) Pull request description: When trying to send a transaction from an encrypted wallet, the ask passphrase dialog would not allow the user to click the "OK" button and proceed. Therefore it was impossible to send a transaction through the gui. It was not enabling the "OK" button after the passphrase was entered by the user, because it was using the same form validation logic as the "Change passphrase" flow. I reported this in a comment in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/136. But then I realized this seems to be a flat out bug. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 8008ef770f3d0b14d03e22371314500373732143 hebasto: ACK 8008ef770f3d0b14d03e22371314500373732143, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged. Tree-SHA512: cc09b34c7f3aea09729e1c7ccccff05dc11fec56fee2ad369f2d862979572b1edd8b7e738ffe6e91d35d071b819b0c3e0f5d48bf5e27427a80af4a28893f8aaf
2020-11-28Merge #20448: RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Allow specifying wallet_name param ↵MarcoFalke
matching RPC endpoint wallet 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Allow specifying wallet_name param matching RPC endpoint (Luke Dashjr) Pull request description: Allow specifying the `wallet_name` param to `unloadwallet` on RPC wallet endpoints, so long as it matches the endpoint wallet. ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d MarcoFalke: review ACK 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d Tree-SHA512: efb399c33f7b5596870a26a8680f453ca47aa7a6db4e550f9435d13044f1c4bad0ae11e8f0205213409d08b75c4188c3be782e54aafab1f65b97eb8cf5c252a9
2020-11-27qt: unlock wallet "OK" button bugfixMichael Dietz
When trying to send a transaction from an encrypted wallet, the ask passphrase dialog would not allow the user to click the "OK" button and proceed. Therefore it was impossible to send a transaction through the gui. It was not enabling the "OK" button after the passphrase was entered by the user, because it was using the same form validation logic as the "Change passphrase" flow.
2020-11-27Add [[nodiscard]] to RenameOver(...)practicalswift
2020-11-27Handle rename failure in DumpMempool(...) by using RenameOver(...) return valuepracticalswift
2020-11-27refactor: Replace deprecated Qt::SystemLocale{Short,Long}DateHennadii Stepanov
2020-11-26Mention units of MAX_STANDARD_ policy constantsPieter Wuille
2020-11-26Mention in validation that IsWitnessStandard tests for P2TRPieter Wuille
2020-11-26Clean up assets test minimizer LDFLAGSPieter Wuille
2020-11-26Document additional IsWitnessStandard behaviorPieter Wuille
2020-11-26Add comments on CPubKey::IsValidPieter Wuille
2020-11-26Add comments to VerifyTaprootCommitmentPieter Wuille
2020-11-26Remove NODISCARDpracticalswift
2020-11-26scripted-diff: Use [[nodiscard]] (C++17) instead of NODISCARDpracticalswift
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i "s/NODISCARD/[[nodiscard]]/g" $(git grep -l "NODISCARD" ":(exclude)src/bench/nanobench.h" ":(exclude)src/attributes.h") -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2020-11-25Add MAX_STANDARD_SCRIPTSIG_SIZE to policysanket1729
Bitcoin core has a standardness rule for max satisfaction script sig size. This PR adds to the policy header file so that it is documented along with along policy rules. The initial reasoning that 1650 is an implicit limit(would not reached assuming all other policy rules are being followed) is outdated. As we now know, bitcoin transactions can have spend conditions are more than just signatures and there may exist p2sh transactions involving 100 byte preimages that maybe non-standard because of this rule. Because this rule is no longer implicit, we should explicitly document it in policy header file
2020-11-25build: Drop unneeded ApplicationServices framework dependencyHennadii Stepanov
2020-11-25Merge #19337: sync: detect double lock from the same threadWladimir J. van der Laan
95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6 sync: detect double lock from the same thread (Vasil Dimov) 4df6567e4cbb4677e8048de2f8008612e1b860b9 sync: make EnterCritical() & push_lock() type safe (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: Double lock of the same (non-recursive) mutex from the same thread would produce an undefined behavior. Detect this from `DEBUG_LOCKORDER` and react similarly to the deadlock detection. This came up during discussion in another, related PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19238#discussion_r442394521. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: code review ACK 95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6 hebasto: re-ACK 95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6 Tree-SHA512: 375c62db7819e348bfaecc3bd82a7907fcd8f5af24f7d637ac82f3f16789da9fc127dbd0e37158a08e0dcbba01a55c6635caf1d8e9e827cf5a3747f7690a498e
2020-11-25Merge #19387: span: update constructors to match c++20 draft spec and add ↵MarcoFalke
lifetimebound attribute e3e7446305329ce96e9cf5f5161658eb2e1ea888 Add lifetimebound to attributes for general-purpose usage (Cory Fields) 1d58cc7cb040a70f768b632f294db4e0797d3a34 span: add lifetimebound attribute (Cory Fields) 62733fee874bfe7e833e71380eb8efd6a3126fbd span: (almost) match std::span's constructor behavior (Cory Fields) Pull request description: Replaces #19382 with a different approach. See [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19382#discussion_r446332852) for the reasoning behind the switch. -- Description from #19382: See [here](http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0936r0.pdf) for more detail on lifetimebound. This is implemented using preprocesor macros rather than configure checks in order to keep span.h self-contained. The ```[[clang::lifetimebound]]``` syntax was chosen over ```__attribute__((lifetimebound))``` because the former is more flexible and works to guard ```this``` as well as function parameters, and also because at least for now, it's available only in clang. There are currently no violations in our codebase, but this can easily be tested by inserting one like this somewhere and compiling with a modern clang: ```c++ Span<const int> bad(std::vector<int>{1,2,3}); ``` The result: > warning: temporary whose address is used as value of local variable 'bad' will be destroyed at the end of the full-expression [-Wdangling] Span<const int> bad(std::vector<int>{1,2,3}); ``` ACKs for top commit: sipa: ACK e3e7446305329ce96e9cf5f5161658eb2e1ea888 ajtowns: ACK e3e7446305329ce96e9cf5f5161658eb2e1ea888 (drive by; only a quick skim of code and some basic sanity checks) MarcoFalke: review ACK e3e7446305329ce96e9cf5f5161658eb2e1ea888 🔗 jonatack: ACK e3e7446 change since last review is adding `[[clang::lifetimebound]]` as `LIFETIMEBOUND` to src/attributes.h as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19387#issuecomment-650752959. Tree-SHA512: 05a3440ee595ef0e8d693a2820b360707695c016a68e15df47c20cd8d053646cc6c8cca8addd7db40e72b3fce208879a41c8102ba7ae9223e4366e5de1175211
2020-11-25Drop noop gcc version checksHennadii Stepanov
Since #20413 the minimum required GCC version is 7. Co-authored-by: practicalswift <practicalswift@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-11-25Merge #20403: wallet: upgradewallet fixes, improvements, test coverageMarcoFalke
3eb6f8b2e61c24a22ea9396d86672307845f35eb wallet (not for backport): improve upgradewallet error messages (Jon Atack) ca8cd893bb56bf5d455154b0498b1f58f77d20ed wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet error responses (Jon Atack) 99d56e357159c7154f69f28cb5587c5ca20d6594 wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet result responses (Jon Atack) 2498b04ce88696a3216fc38b7d393906b733e8b1 Don't upgrade to HD split if it is already supported (Andrew Chow) c46c18b788cb0862aafbb116fd37936cbed6a431 wallet: refactor GetClosestWalletFeature() (Jon Atack) Pull request description: This follows up on #18836 and #20282 to fix and improve the as-yet unreleased `upgradewallet` feature and also implement review follow-up in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18836#discussion_r519328607. This PR fixes 4 upgradewallet issues: - this bug: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20403#discussion_r526063920 - it returns nothing in the absence of an RPC error, which isn't reassuring for users - it returns the same thing both in the case of a successful upgrade and when no upgrade took place - the error message object is currently dead code This PR fixes the above and provides: ...user feedback to not silently return without upgrading ``` { "wallet_name": "disable private keys", "previous_version": 169900, "current_version": 169900, "result": "Already at latest version. Wallet version unchanged." } ``` ...better feedback after successfully upgrading ``` { "wallet_name": "watch-only", "previous_version": 159900, "current_version": 169900, "result": "Wallet upgraded successfully from version 159900 to version 169900." } ``` ...helpful error responses ``` { "wallet_name": "blank", "previous_version": 169900, "current_version": 169900, "error": "Cannot downgrade wallet from version 169900 to version 159900. Wallet version unchanged." } { "wallet_name": "blank", "previous_version": 130000, "current_version": 130000, "error": "Cannot upgrade a non HD split wallet from version 130000 to version 169899 without upgrading to support pre-split keypool. Please use version 169900 or no version specified." } ``` updated help: ``` upgradewallet ( version ) Upgrade the wallet. Upgrades to the latest version if no version number is specified. New keys may be generated and a new wallet backup will need to be made. Arguments: 1. version (numeric, optional, default=169900) The version number to upgrade to. Default is the latest wallet version. Result: { (json object) "wallet_name" : "str", (string) Name of wallet this operation was performed on "previous_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet before this operation "current_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet after this operation "result" : "str", (string, optional) Description of result, if no error "error" : "str" (string, optional) Error message (if there is one) } ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 3eb6f8b MarcoFalke: review ACK 3eb6f8b2e61c24a22ea9396d86672307845f35eb 🛡 Tree-SHA512: b767314069e26b5933b123acfea6aa40708507f504bdb22884da020a4ca1332af38a7072b061e36281533af9f4e236d94d3c129daf6fe5b55241127537038eed
2020-11-25Merge #20469: build: Avoid secp256k1.h include from systemWladimir J. van der Laan
e95aaefe2540cb76969818fcc2ff77d33448ed5a build: Avoid secp256k1.h include from system (Niklas Gögge) Pull request description: While building i ran into an error because i had a version of `secp256k1.h` under `/usr/local/include` that was incompatible with the secp256k1 code in the repository. This caused a problem because `$(BOOST_CPPFLAGS)` contained `-I/usr/local/include` and the include paths are searched by the compiler in order from left to right, so in the end `$(BITCOIN_INCLUDES)` contained `-I/usr/local/include` before `-I$(srcdir)/secp256k1/include` which caused the compiler to find `secp256k1.h` under `/usr/local/include`. Looking at git blame i am wondering how this has not happened to anyone else in several years: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blame/cb89e18845852c005ba8ab94acc6544d7c876a42/src/Makefile.am#L25 I am on macOS 10.15. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK e95aaefe2540cb76969818fcc2ff77d33448ed5a hebasto: ACK e95aaefe2540cb76969818fcc2ff77d33448ed5a, tested on macOS 11 Big Sur by adding `#error` into `/usr/local/include/secp256k1.h`. Tree-SHA512: 1f0b395725936c179ab60dee3582ec7b21e2f9c0f1895e160d84a487cf0db16d0c7aa47d05800e0aded31685b4362056cac9b9ecca1bb8c308a4c5a810e8dc1d
2020-11-25Merge #20410: wallet: Do not treat default constructed types as None-typeMarcoFalke
fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d wallet: Do not treat default constructed types as None-type (MarcoFalke) fac4e136fa3d0fab7fde900a6be921313e16e7a6 refactor: Change pointer to reference because it can not be null (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Equating `0==None` and `""==None` is confusing, unneeded and undocumented ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d achow101: ACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d Sjors: tACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d modulo `unset` Tree-SHA512: c4c8d0ad80c6697621d356a9545caf28ca2facc82bb2fa8e70eceb52372d25f0685237c73688c4b01da0e75d213c77c0d45011a8bdfe81ea783d85f045786dac
2020-11-24Move WalletImpl from interfaces/wallet.cpp to wallet/interfaces.cppRussell Yanofsky
2020-11-24Move ChainImpl from interfaces/chain.cpp to node/interfaces.cppRussell Yanofsky
No changes to ChainImpl or any related classes (review with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`)
2020-11-24Move NodeImpl from interfaces/node.cpp to node/interfaces.cppRussell Yanofsky
2020-11-24Merge #20472: test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with ↵MarcoFalke
leading +/-/0:s 05c10953887bd78af2e21ef6d3c07f90dd885572 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s. Context: While working on #20457 and #20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 05c10953887bd78af2e21ef6d3c07f90dd885572 laanwj: Code review ACK 05c10953887bd78af2e21ef6d3c07f90dd885572 jonatack: ACK 05c10953887bd78af2e21ef6d3c07f90dd885572 promag: Code review ACK 05c10953887bd78af2e21ef6d3c07f90dd885572. Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
2020-11-24Merge #20462: RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Clarify docs/error when both the RPC ↵MarcoFalke
request and wallet_name parameter specify a wallet b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16 RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Clarify docs/error when both the RPC endpoint and wallet_name parameter specify a wallet (Luke Dashjr) Pull request description: Just documentation clarifications from #20448 ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16 jonatack: re-ACK b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16 per `git diff e8303a0 b1f59d5` Tree-SHA512: ac068b0aa7ceed49496367fdd9425b59dbba18b56e89b26afc22a6c8ece51f0b92a169cacd55740b1cadab2b32f4f8e8700e609066ab7e59d3b53c7891da585e
2020-11-24test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:spracticalswift
2020-11-24RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Allow specifying wallet_name param matching RPC ↵Luke Dashjr
endpoint
2020-11-24RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Clarify docs/error when both the RPC endpoint and ↵Luke Dashjr
wallet_name parameter specify a wallet
2020-11-23build: Avoid secp256k1.h include from systemNiklas Gögge
2020-11-23Merge #20202: wallet: Make BDB support optionalWladimir J. van der Laan
d52f502b1ea1cafa7d58c5517f01dba26ecb7269 Fix mock SQLiteDatabases (Andrew Chow) 99309ab3e96a290359b84f9b657c5115aa3470dd Allow disabling BDB in configure with --without-bdb (Andrew Chow) ee47f11f7399ec3a4330ea1f2fc388c7e32959d6 GUI: Force descriptor wallets when BDB is not compiled (Andrew Chow) 71e40b33bd1e72ccf5d82e1d3f8b481f8e965492 RPC: Require descriptors=True for createwallet when BDB is not compiled (Andrew Chow) 6ebc41bf9cb0184554923e84e1935195d356f2b3 Enforce salvage is only for BDB wallets (Andrew Chow) a58b719cf75e2d97205ec260bcff0d4780fe4fb8 Do not compile BDB things when USE_BDB is defined (Andrew Chow) b33af48210c117a734fc3e1bebeb1c2057645775 Include wallet/bdb.h where it is actually being used (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: Adds a `--without-bdb` option to `configure` which disables the compilation of the BDB stuff. Legacy wallets will not be created when BDB is not compiled. A legacy-sqlite wallet can be loaded, but we will not create them. Based on #20156 to resolve the situation where both `--without-sqlite` and `--without-bdb` are provided. In that case, the wallet is disabled and `--disable-wallet` is effectively set. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK d52f502b1ea1cafa7d58c5517f01dba26ecb7269 Tree-SHA512: 5a92ba7a542acc2e27003e9d4e5940e0d02d5c1f110db06cdcab831372bfd83e8d89c269caff31dd5bff062c1cf5f04683becff12bd23a33be731676f346553d
2020-11-23Merge #20432: net: Treat raw message bytes as uint8_tWladimir J. van der Laan
fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c net: Treat raw message bytes as uint8_t (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Using `uint8_t` from the beginning when messages are `recv`ed has two style benefits: * The signedness is clear from reading the code, as it does not depend on the architecture * When passing the bytes on, the need for static signedness casts is dropped, making the code a bit less verbose and more coherent ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c theStack: Code Review ACK fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c jonatack: Tested ACK fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c Tree-SHA512: e6d9803c78633fde3304faf592afa961ff9462a7912d1da97a24720265274aa10ab4168d71b6ec2756b7448dd42585321afee0e5c889e705be778ce9a330d145
2020-11-21Merge #20426: wallet: allow zero-fee ↵MarcoFalke
fundrawtransaction/walletcreatefundedpsbt and other fixes 9f08780dd7946b63476e9736745131db8e7f4e93 Use the correct incremental fee constant in bumpfee help (Jon Atack) 3f1e10b2b1cd11f7112fbad6355464bd4adbbc5c Update feeRate (BTC/kvB) to fee_rate (sat/vB) in wallet_bumpfee (Jon Atack) 1b3d7009280595108eb22ac1188bc4367804fc5d Allow zero-fee fundrawtxn and walletcreatefundedpsbt calls (Jon Atack) Pull request description: - Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20305/files#r525406176. A check to raise an error on zero-fee txns was mistakenly extended in a0d4957 from the bumpfee and send{toaddress, many} RPCs to also include fundrawtransaction and walletcreatefundedpsbt. This commit re-overrides zero fee rate checking for these two RPCs, not only for the feeRate (BTC/kvB) arg to return to previous behavior, but also for the new fee_rate (sat/vB) arg. Negative fee rates will still raise "amount out of range" by the MoneyRange check in src/bitcoin-tx.cpp::AmountFromValue. - Updates a wallet bumpfee test from feeRate (BTC/kvB) to fee_rate (sat/vB) - Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20305/files#r525405363 to use the correct incremental fee rate constant in the bumpfee help (thanks Marco Falke for the catch) and rectifies "1.000 sat/vB sat/vB" in the help to "1.000 sat/vB" ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 9f08780dd7946b63476e9736745131db8e7f4e93 🐾 promag: Code review ACK 9f08780dd7946b63476e9736745131db8e7f4e93. Xekyo: Code review reACK 9f08780dd7946b63476e9736745131db8e7f4e93. Tree-SHA512: 413dfb4f23ebaf3d2ef210dd04610a843272e64eabba428699f5de4d646a86ac4911dab66b5e2f5ebea53b76e4be8347ef40824c1592c750d5eaa12579d3cdf6
2020-11-20Merge #20223: build: Drop the leading 0 from the version numberMarcoFalke
8f7b93047581c67f2133cdb8c7845471de66c30f Drop the leading 0 from the version number (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was accidentally not included in the version number. The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously, as the Major version was 0 so it never actually got included in it. The user agent string formatter is updated to follow this new versioning. *** Honestly I'm just tired of all of the people asking for "1.0" that maybe this'll shut them up. Skip the whole 1.0 thing and go straight to version 22.0! Also, this means that the terminology we commonly use lines up with how the variables are named. So major versions are actually bumping the major version number, etc. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: Code review ACK 8f7b930475 MarcoFalke: review ACK 8f7b93047581c67f2133cdb8c7845471de66c30f 🎻 Tree-SHA512: b5c3fae14d4c0a9c0ab3b1db7c949ecc0ac3537646306b13d98dd0efc17c489cdd16d43f0a24aaa28e9c4a92ea360500e05480a335b03f9fb308010cdd93a436
2020-11-20net: Treat raw message bytes as uint8_tMarcoFalke
2020-11-20Merge #20424: build: Update univalue subtreefanquake
2a55a0ed3055a2ce0a33b58a3a7bbf6e30df3dfd Squashed 'src/univalue/' changes from 98261b1e7b..98fadc0909 (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Just a minor bugfix: Currently we don't push booleans into arrays, but if we did they'd be pushed as integers. Can be tested by reverting the diff in `include/` and observing a test failure. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK fa17eef6274811be5348149443e563bca95d54a3 practicalswift: cr ACK fa17eef6274811be5348149443e563bca95d54a3 Tree-SHA512: d87ca5be6769b4cd0c9b9e319973bc0c4f2b7121779f9554e11f34a4edb0013997e875c7edb7bc6eb9309ff5c13379d22f436cd4fb9e6e68df6f0aee29fed914
2020-11-20Use the correct incremental fee constant in bumpfee helpJon Atack
and remove redundant units ("Must be at least 1.000 sat/vB sat/vB" -> "1.00 sat vB")
2020-11-20Allow zero-fee fundrawtxn and walletcreatefundedpsbt callsJon Atack
A check to raise an error on zero-fee txns was mistakenly extended in commit a0d4957 from the bumpfee and send{toaddress, many} RPCs to also include fundrawtransaction and walletcreatefundedpsbt. This commit overrides zero fee rate checking for these two RPCs, not only for the feeRate (BTC/kvB) arg to return to previous behavior, but also for the new fee_rate (sat/vB) arg.
2020-11-20Merge bitcoin-core/gui#13: Hide peer detail view if multiple are selectedJonas Schnelli
76277cc77dea39b53e09ee1c440cd37270826201 qt: Hide peer detail view if multiple are selected (João Barbosa) Pull request description: Currently if multiple peers are selected the peer detail view shows the first new selected peer. With this PR the peer detail view is hidden when multiple peers are selected. It is also a slight refactor to simplify and remove duplicate code. ACKs for top commit: jonasschnelli: Tested ACK 76277cc77dea39b53e09ee1c440cd37270826201. hebasto: ACK 76277cc77dea39b53e09ee1c440cd37270826201, tested on Linux Mint 20 (Qt 5.12.8). Tree-SHA512: 16c9cfd6ccb7077a9f31917a6cb3532e32d17d21f735e43bf4720fb0c8bb1bd539d42569c105df4b551f5dccb4acaeedb6bb2362620a9cb9267a602d9d065b9f
2020-11-20Merge bitcoin-core/gui#21: Update pruning tooltip, original author ↵Jonas Schnelli
BitcoinErrorLog 2fc5efc55c886f1b874ce6cd02c9082b5bb6435a Update pruning tooltip, original author BitcoinErrorLog (Riccardo Spagni) Pull request description: Squashed commits from BitcoinErrorLog at his request, per the original discussion on #15: this tooltip has been adjusted to be more user-friendly and reflect what the net effect of pruning is for the user. ACKs for top commit: harding: Untested ACK 2fc5efc55c886f1b874ce6cd02c9082b5bb6435a Sjors: utACK 2fc5efc55c886f1b874ce6cd02c9082b5bb6435a and welcome to the dark side! jonasschnelli: ACK 2fc5efc55c886f1b874ce6cd02c9082b5bb6435a Tree-SHA512: 45d6a7efbf4d34d20b9de439c988a39c739591b854726b6682c4cffcb23dff7d9131afab572fa0c9a8bc033c46c3878efdfbf8a984aafde632e1dfc1caa1cbbb
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-11-05 08:12:29 +0000