aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-01-28doc: fix wording of alertnotifywillcl-ark
Since the removal of the PartitionChecker code in ab8be98fdb25b678a8cd7e89adf06d1b1f6bdd62 the documentation of alertnotify no longer matches the implementation. Instead simply document that alertnotify will be called when "an alert is raised".
2022-01-28Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23508: Add getdeploymentinfo RPCMarcoFalke
a3809228917b8f750090c8bfec8e283391dbb524 Release notes for getdeploymentinfo rpc (Anthony Towns) 240cad09baefcf363cce36a4b2795122adfce27f rpc: getdeploymentinfo: include signalling info (Anthony Towns) 376c0c6dae2bebbb3e1352377e71fb1996d09f64 rpc: getdeploymentinfo: include block hash/height (Anthony Towns) a7469bcd35692d56f57e91b3f21d30855bdf6531 rpc: getdeploymentinfo: change stats to always refer to current period (Anthony Towns) 7f15c1841b98de6931a7ac68e16635a05d3e96cf rpc: getdeploymentinfo: allow specifying a blockhash other than tip (Anthony Towns) fd826130a0a4e67fdc26f8064f4ecb4ff79b3333 rpc: move softfork info from getblockchaininfo to getdeploymentinfo (Anthony Towns) Pull request description: The aim of this PR is to improve the ability to monitor soft fork status. It first moves the softfork section from getblockchaininfo into a new RPC named getdeploymentinfo, which is then also able to query the status of forks at an arbitrary block rather than only at the tip. In addition, bip9 status is changed to indicate the status of the given block, rather than just for the next block, and an additional field is included to indicate whether each block in the signalling period signaled. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review and lightly tested ACK a3809228917b8f750090c8bfec8e283391dbb524 Sjors: tACK a3809228917b8f750090c8bfec8e283391dbb524 fjahr: tACK a3809228917b8f750090c8bfec8e283391dbb524 Tree-SHA512: 7417d733b47629f229c5128586569909250481a3e94356c52fe67a03fd42cd81745246e384b98c4115fb61587714c879e4bc3e5f5c74407d9f8f6773472a33cb
2022-01-28style: wrap long lines in CNode creation and add some commentsVasil Dimov
2022-01-28scripted-diff: rename CNode::cs_hSocket to CNode::m_sock_mutexVasil Dimov
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i -e 's/cs_hSocket/m_sock_mutex/g' $(git grep -l cs_hSocket) -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2022-01-28net: use Sock in CNodeVasil Dimov
Change `CNode` to use a pointer to `Sock` instead of a bare `SOCKET`. This will help mocking / testing / fuzzing more code.
2022-01-27Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23438: refactor: Use spans of std::byte in serializelaanwj
fa5d2e678c809c26bd40d7e7c171529d3ffb5903 Remove unused char serialize (MarcoFalke) fa24493d6394b3a477535f480664c9596f18e3c5 Use spans of std::byte in serialize (MarcoFalke) fa65bbf217b725ada35107b4ad646d250228355c span: Add BytePtr helper (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This changes the serialize code (`.read()` and `.write()` functions) to take a `Span` instead of a pointer and size. This is a breaking change for the serialize interface, so at no additional cost we can also switch to `std::byte` (instead of using `char`). The benefits of using `Span`: * Less verbose and less fragile code when passing an already existing `Span`(-like) object to or from serialization The benefits of using `std::byte`: * `std::byte` can't accidentally be mistaken for an integer The goal here is to only change serialize to use spans of `std::byte`. If needed, `AsBytes`, `MakeUCharSpan`, ... can be used (temporarily) to pass spans of the right type. Other changes that are included here: * [#22167](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22167) (refactor: Remove char serialize by MarcoFalke) * [#21906](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21906) (Preserve const in cast on CTransactionSignatureSerializer by promag) ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Concept and code review ACK fa5d2e678c809c26bd40d7e7c171529d3ffb5903 sipa: re-utACK fa5d2e678c809c26bd40d7e7c171529d3ffb5903 Tree-SHA512: 08ee9eced5fb777cedae593b11e33660bed9a3e1711a7451a87b835089a96c99ce0632918bb4666a4e859c4d020f88fb50f2dd734216b0c3d1a9a704967ece6f
2022-01-27fuzz: Speed up script fuzz targetMarcoFalke
2022-01-27Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22932: Add CBlockIndex lock annotations, guard ↵laanwj
nStatus/nFile/nDataPos/nUndoPos by cs_main 6ea56827842b9b2bd730edc38f3a7b1f46f6247b Guard CBlockIndex::nStatus/nFile/nDataPos/nUndoPos by cs_main (Jon Atack) 5d59ae0ba88849b1eb0d7350871bc19fcd5ef601 Remove/inline ReadRawBlockFromDisk(block_data, pindex, message_start) (Hennadii Stepanov) eaeeb88768db529b5241ccd42f1e87579908b4df Require IsBlockPruned() to hold mutex cs_main (Jon Atack) ca47b005770f71aa229ecc1f7b8146a96ff02151 Require CBlockIndex::IsValid() to hold cs_main (Vasil Dimov) e9f3aa5f6a7b39e8d5f2069617e5e382798d8d60 Require CBlockIndex::RaiseValidity() to hold cs_main (Vasil Dimov) 8ef457cb83fac796f8b6a56977b1016193fc1185 Require CBlockIndex::IsAssumedValid() to hold cs_main (Vasil Dimov) 572393448b4d32f91b92edc84b4200ab52d62422 Require CBlockIndex::GetUndoPos() to hold mutex cs_main (Jon Atack) 2e557ced2830fc54476e598d52225f1679205e7d Require WriteUndoDataForBlock() to hold mutex cs_main (Jon Atack) 6fd4341c10b319399c58d71c4ddeae4417e337d7 Require CBlockIndex::GetBlockPos() to hold mutex cs_main (Jon Atack) Pull request description: Issues: - `CBlockIndex` member functions `GetBlockPos()`, `GetUndoPos()`, `IsAssumedValid()`, `RaiseValidity()`, and `IsValid()` and block storage functions `WriteUndoDataForBlock()` and `IsBlockPruned()` are missing thread safety lock annotations to help ensure that they are called with mutex cs_main to avoid bugs like #22895. Doing this also enables the next step: - `CBlockIndex::nStatus` may be racy, i.e. potentially accessed by multiple threads, see #17161. A solution is to guard it by cs_main, along with fellow data members `nFile`, `nDataPos` and `nUndoPos`. This pull: - adds thread safety lock annotations for the functions listed above - guards `CBlockIndex::nStatus`, `nFile`, `nDataPos` and `nUndoPos` by cs_main How to review and test: - debug build with clang and verify there are no `-Wthread-safety-analysis` warnings - review the code to verify each annotation or lock is necessary and sensible, or if any are missing - look for whether taking a lock can be replaced by a lock annotation instead - for more information about Clang thread safety analysis, see - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThreadSafetyAnalysis.html - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#lockingmutex-usage-notes - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#threads-and-synchronization Mitigates/potentially closes #17161. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK 6ea56827842b9b2bd730edc38f3a7b1f46f6247b Tree-SHA512: 3ebf429c8623c51f944a7245a2e48d2aa088dec4c4914b40aa6049e89856c1ee8586f6e2e3b65195190566637a33004468b51a781e61a082248748015167569b
2022-01-27Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24167: fs: consistently use fsbridge:: for ifstream / ↵fanquake
ofstream 5e8975e2694c3178ae73deb28986e1fb5466147e fs: consistently use fsbridge for fopen() (fanquake) 486261dfcb5ea3ec205a632066298ffa492de466 fs: add missing <cassert> include (fanquake) 21f781ad7921ebda9f38a6be362e23750d8cd5a6 fs: consistently use fsbridge for {i,o}fstream (fanquake) Pull request description: These changes are part of #20744, but are also ok to do now, and reduce the diff in that PR. See commit messages for details. Revived from #23857. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK 5e8975e2694c3178ae73deb28986e1fb5466147e MarcoFalke: ACK 5e8975e2694c3178ae73deb28986e1fb5466147e 🏕 Tree-SHA512: ee2dc857ce2479b39b65615e689f934b962e580299b0e7a0c6361633402b0d61e6e4479f41f6480e2c46101264d93f330b8f7b57e56df95a7f77e046a4e44697
2022-01-26Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#16795: rpc: have raw transaction decoding infer output ↵Andrew Chow
descriptors 6498ba151b35ce9621ad00730f1fdfca55538ace transaction decoding infer output descriptors (Gregory Sanders) Pull request description: Following discussion in #16725 this is complementary data to expose. All outputs are inferred. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 6498ba151b35ce9621ad00730f1fdfca55538ace meshcollider: utACK 6498ba151b35ce9621ad00730f1fdfca55538ace Tree-SHA512: 36664117ddbe46d5fdde7ed6541ef2c9d8dfb7a3636b97f363bf1c325096fe00d9d2acea2d1917ea19fdb82f1ea296c12e440c5c703d6a9bfc1a02fba028bcd8
2022-01-26Extract CTxIn::MAX_SEQUENCE_NONFINAL constantMarcoFalke
2022-01-26fs: consistently use fsbridge for fopen()fanquake
2022-01-26fs: add missing <cassert> includefanquake
This is needed to prevent compilation failures once boost is removed, however is still correct to include now, and reduces the diff in #20744. <string> is extracted from the defines because it is used for Windows and non-Windows code, i.e get_filesystem_error_message().
2022-01-26fs: consistently use fsbridge for {i,o}fstreamfanquake
Part of #20744, but this can be done now, and will simplify the diff.
2022-01-26Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24155: doc: Fix rpc docsfanquake
fac8caaa6252c6e18301a263d325d63197062639 doc: Fix rpc docs (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Broken in commit 39d9bbe4acd7441aa9a61c57b76d887c4225a0e2. The fix removes the "type" `OBJ_EMPTY` added in commit 8d1a3e6498de6087501969a9d243b0697ca3fe97, which isn't really a separate type and instead runs a check on `OBJ` whether it is empty or not. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: tACK fac8caaa6252c6e18301a263d325d63197062639 Tree-SHA512: dd978fe526a45095800249204afd26a239078e83b15124a5756ac078c473a677a3084b8f54e34d6dd5580abef7275c875a14bc9eb20d8feab066dfb0f0932967
2022-01-26p2p, contrib: update i2p hardcoded seedsJon Atack
Remove unresponsive seeds, and add one that has been up for the past half year.
2022-01-26p2p, contrib: add cjdns hardcoded seedsJon Atack
2022-01-26test: add combined CJDNS/I2P/localhost/onion eviction protection testsJon Atack
2022-01-26test: add tests for inbound eviction protection of CJDNS peersJon Atack
2022-01-26test: fix off-by-one logic in an eviction protection testJon Atack
2022-01-26p2p: extend inbound eviction protection by network to CJDNS peersJon Atack
This commit extends our inbound eviction protection to CJDNS peers to favorise the diversity of peer connections, as peers connected through the CJDNS network are otherwise disadvantaged by our eviction criteria for their higher latency (higher min ping times) relative to IPv4 and IPv6 peers. The `networks` array is order-dependent in the case of a tie in candidate counts between networks; earlier array members receive priority in the case of a tie. Therefore, we place CJDNS candidates before I2P, localhost, and onion ones in terms of opportunity to recover unused remaining protected slots from the previous iteration, estimating that most nodes allowing several inbound privacy networks will have more onion, localhost or I2P peers than CJDNS ones, as CJDNS support is only being added in the upcoming v23.0 release.
2022-01-26transaction decoding infer output descriptorsGregory Sanders
2022-01-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24067: wallet: Actually treat (un)confirmed txs as ↵Andrew Chow
(un)confirmed fac816544317cee6553d60cb0f5f24f6f9ec98de Remove unused checkFinalTx (MarcoFalke) fa272eab44553df9b0bed3ca20caf2a7bd193680 wallet: Avoid dropping confirmed coins (MarcoFalke) 888841ea8d38fc059ca06ef67af7f31f8d8418a4 interfaces: Remove unused is_final (MarcoFalke) dddd05e7a3389fcbd90bb4acdfe1f59945d9f381 qt: Treat unconfirmed txs as unconfirmed (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: The wallet has several issues: ## Unconfirmed txs in the GUI The GUI clumsily attempts to guess if unconfirmed txs are locked until a future time. This is currently based on the locktime only, not nSequence, thus wrong. Fix this by removing the clumsy code and treat all unconfirmed txs as unconfirmed. The GUI already prints whether a tx is in the mempool, in which case the user knows that the tx wasn't locked until a future time. If the tx is not in the mempool, it might be better to report the exact reject reason from the mempool instead of using incorrect heuristics. ## Confirmed txs in the wallet The wallet drops coins that it incorrectly assumes to be locked until a future time, even if they are already confirmed in the chain. This is because the wallet is using the wrong time (adjusted network time) instead of MTP, due to the `-1` default argument of `CheckFinalTx`. The issues are fixed in separate commits and there is even a test. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK fac816544317cee6553d60cb0f5f24f6f9ec98de prayank23: reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24067/commits/fac816544317cee6553d60cb0f5f24f6f9ec98de glozow: code review ACK fac8165443, I understand now how this fixes both issues. Tree-SHA512: 210afb855f4c6d903fee49eba6b1a9735d699cf0168b669eabb38178e53b3a522258b7cc669f52489c6cd3e38bf358afde12eef3ba2e2f2ffaeb06b8f652ccd0
2022-01-25Guard CBlockIndex::nStatus/nFile/nDataPos/nUndoPos by cs_mainJon Atack
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
2022-01-25Remove/inline ReadRawBlockFromDisk(block_data, pindex, message_start)Hennadii Stepanov
2022-01-25Require IsBlockPruned() to hold mutex cs_mainJon Atack
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
2022-01-25Require CBlockIndex::IsValid() to hold cs_mainVasil Dimov
2022-01-25Require CBlockIndex::RaiseValidity() to hold cs_mainVasil Dimov
2022-01-25Require CBlockIndex::IsAssumedValid() to hold cs_mainVasil Dimov
2022-01-25Require CBlockIndex::GetUndoPos() to hold mutex cs_mainJon Atack
2022-01-25Require WriteUndoDataForBlock() to hold mutex cs_mainJon Atack
Mutex cs_main is already held by the caller of WriteUndoDataForBlock(). This change is needed to require CBlockIndex::GetUndoPos() to hold cs_main and CBlockIndex::nStatus to be guarded by cs_main in the following commits without adding 2 unnecessary cs_main locks to WriteUndoDataForBlock().
2022-01-25Require CBlockIndex::GetBlockPos() to hold mutex cs_mainJon Atack
2022-01-25doc: Fix rpc docsMarcoFalke
Broken in commit 39d9bbe4acd7441aa9a61c57b76d887c4225a0e2
2022-01-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23706: rpc: getblockfrompeer followupsMarcoFalke
923312fbf6a89efde1739da0b7209694d4f892ba rpc: use peer_id, block_hash for FetchBlock (Sjors Provoost) 34d5399211eeb61e7e7961c301fb2ddea8aa3f6a rpc: more detailed errors for getblockfrompeer (Sjors Provoost) 60243cac7286e4c4bdda7094bef4cf6d1564b583 rpc: turn already downloaded into error in getblockfrompeer (Sjors Provoost) 809d66bb65aa78048e27c2a878d6f7becaecfe11 rpc: clarify getblockfrompeer behavior when called multiple times (Sjors Provoost) 0e3d7c5ee16d5a4c061ab9a57285bceb7899b512 refactor: drop redundant hash argument from FetchBlock (Sjors Provoost) 8d1a3e6498de6087501969a9d243b0697ca3fe97 rpc: allow empty JSON object result (Sjors Provoost) bfbf91d0b2004dde358253ac174982f784b43b59 test: fancier Python for getblockfrompeer (Sjors Provoost) Pull request description: Followups from #20295. ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK 923312fbf6a89efde1739da0b7209694d4f892ba :package: fjahr: tested ACK 923312fbf6a89efde1739da0b7209694d4f892ba Tree-SHA512: da9eca76e302e249409c9d7f0d16cca668ed981e2ab6ca2d1743dad0d830b94b1bc5ffb9028a00764b863201945c273cc8f4409a4c9ca3817830007dffa2bc20
2022-01-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23201: wallet: Allow users to specify input weights ↵laanwj
when funding a transaction 3866272c450cc659207fbc2cff3c690ae8593341 tests: Test specifying input weights (Andrew Chow) 6fa762a37298c4cd3ac063b46b7d1b353d7a658b rpc, wallet: Allow users to specify input weights (Andrew Chow) 808068e90e758b9c74878a5235b2c59731fec3e5 wallet: Allow user specified input size to override (Andrew Chow) 4060c50d7ee31dc8a39229e3553d3d92f8f3516d wallet: add input weights to CCoinControl (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: When funding a transaction with external inputs, instead of providing solving data, a user may want to just provide the maximum signed size of that input. This is particularly useful in cases where the input is nonstandard as our dummy signer is unable to handle those inputs. The input weight can be provided to any input regardless of whether it belongs to the wallet and the provided weight will always be used regardless of any calculated input weight. This allows the user to override the calculated input weight which may overestimate in some circumstances due to missing information (e.g. if the private key is not known, a maximum size signature will be used, but the actual signer may be doing additional work which reduces the size of the signature). For `send` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, the input weight is specified in a `weight` field in an input object. For `fundrawtransaction`, a new `input_weights` field is added to the `options` object. This is an array of objects consisting of a txid, vout, and weight. Closes #23187 ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23201/commits/3866272c450cc659207fbc2cff3c690ae8593341 glozow: reACK 3866272 via range-diff t-bast: ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23201/commits/3866272c450cc659207fbc2cff3c690ae8593341 Tree-SHA512: 2c8b471ee537c62a51389b7c4e86b5ac1c3a223b444195042be8117b3c83e29c0619463610b950cbbd1648d3ed01ecc5bb0b3c4f39640680da9157763b9b9f9f
2022-01-25Avoid integer sanitizer warnings in chain.oMarcoFalke
2022-01-25Remove unused checkFinalTxMarcoFalke
2022-01-25wallet: Avoid dropping confirmed coinsMarcoFalke
2022-01-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24105: Optimize CHECKSIGADD Script ValidationMarcoFalke
cfa575266bc0198574a82e8e386040e969b05dea Optimize CHECKSIGADD Script Validation (Jeremy Rubin) Pull request description: This is a mild validation improvement that improves performance by caching some signature data when you have a Taproot script fragment that uses CHECKSIGADD Multisignatures with sighash single. In some basic testing I showed this to have about a 0.6% speedup during block validation for a block with a lot of CHECKSIGADDs, but that was with the entirety of block validation so the specific impact on the script interpreter performance should be a bit more once you subtract things like coin fetching. If desired I can produce a more specific/sharable bench for this, the code I used to test was just monkey patching the existing taproot tests since generating valid spends is kinda tricky. But it's sort of an obvious win so I'm not sure it needs a rigorous bench, but I will tinker on one of those while the code is being reviewed for correctness. The overhead of this approach is that: 1. ScriptExecutionData is no longer const 2. around 32 bytes of extra stack space 3. zero extra hashing since we only cache on first use ACKs for top commit: sipa: utACK cfa575266bc0198574a82e8e386040e969b05dea MarcoFalke: review ACK cfa575266bc0198574a82e8e386040e969b05dea jonatack: ACK cfa575266bc0198574a82e8e386040e969b05dea theStack: Code-review ACK cfa575266bc0198574a82e8e386040e969b05dea Tree-SHA512: d5938773724bb9c97b6fd623ef7efdf7f522af52dc0903ecb88c38a518b628d7915b7eae6a774f7be653dc6bcd92e9abc4dd5e8b11f3a995e01e0102d2113d09
2022-01-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21464: Mempool Update Cut-Through Optimizationfanquake
c5b36b1c1b11f04e5da7fb44183f61d09a14e40d Mempool Update Cut-Through Optimization (Jeremy Rubin) c49daf9885e86ba08acdc8332d2a34bc5951a487 [TESTS] Increase limitancestorcount in tournament RPC test to showcase improved algorithm (Jeremy Rubin) Pull request description: Often when we're updating mempool entries we update entries that we ultimately end up removing the updated entries shortly thereafter. This patch makes it so that we filter for such entries a bit earlier in processing, which yields a mild improvement for these cases, and is negligible overhead otherwise. There's potential for a better -- but more sophisticated -- algorithm that can be used taking advantage of epochs, but I figured it is better to do something that is simple and works first and upgrade it later as the other epoch mempool work proceeds as it makes the patches for the epoch algorithm simpler to understand, so you can consider this as preparatory work. It could either go in now if it is not controversial, or we could wait until the other patch is ready to go. ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: reACK c5b36b1 sipa: utACK c5b36b1c1b11f04e5da7fb44183f61d09a14e40d mzumsande: Code Review ACK c5b36b1c1b11f04e5da7fb44183f61d09a14e40d Tree-SHA512: 78b16864f77a637d8a68a65e23c019a9757d8b2243486728ef601d212ae482f6084cf8e69d810958c356f1803178046e4697207ba40d6d10529ca57de647fae6
2022-01-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23804: validation: followups for de-duplication of ↵fanquake
packages 3cd7f693d3ed1bb7cf9ba3e0c482174df3684972 [unit test] package parents are a mix (glozow) de075a98eaf0b3f7676c5c78b50b66902202b34c [validation] better handle errors in SubmitPackage (glozow) 9d88853e0c85f765f7d982b15e8122ede50110ed AcceptPackage fixups (glozow) 2db77cd3b835d052de678755bcdde5a645ce2d65 [unit test] different witness in package submission (glozow) 9ad211c5753dbd148ba6f0ed56854f6364362ca8 [doc] more detailed explanation for deduplication (glozow) 83d4fb71260f268abd41d083fb3458476aed83ce [packages] return DIFFERENT_WITNESS for same-txid-different-witness tx (glozow) Pull request description: This addresses some comments from review on e12fafda2dfbbdf63f125e5af797ecfaa6488f66 from #22674. - Improve documentation about de-duplication: [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22674/files#r770156708) - Fix code looking up same-txid-different-witness transaction in mempool: [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22674/files#r770804029) - Improve the interface for when a same-txid-different-witness transaction is swapped: [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22674/files#r770782822) - Add a test for witness swapping: [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22674/files#r770804029) - Add a test for packages with a mix of duplicate/different witness/new parents: [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22674#discussion_r773037608) - Fix issue with not notifying `CValidationInterface` when there's a partial submission due to fail-fast: [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22674#discussion_r773013162) ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 3cd7f693d3ed1bb7cf9ba3e0c482174df3684972 t-bast: LGTM, ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23804/commits/3cd7f693d3ed1bb7cf9ba3e0c482174df3684972 instagibbs: ACK 3cd7f693d3ed1bb7cf9ba3e0c482174df3684972 ariard: ACK 3cd7f69 Tree-SHA512: a5d86ca86edab80a5a05fcbb828901c058b3f2fa2552912ea52f2871e29c3cf4cc34020e7aac2217959c9c3a01856f4bd3d631d844635b98144f212f76c2f3ef
2022-01-24rpc, wallet: Allow users to specify input weightsAndrew Chow
Coin selection requires knowing the weight of a transaction so that fees can be estimated. However for external inputs, the weight may not be avialble, and solving data may not be enough as the input could be one that we do not support. By allowing users to specify input weights, those external inputs can be included in the transaction. Additionally, if the weight for an input is specified, that value will always be used, regardless of whether the input is in the wallet or solving data is available. This allows us to account for scenarios where the wallet may be more conservative and estimate a larger input than may actually be created. For example, we assume the maximum DER signature size, but an external input may be signed by a wallet which does nonce grinding in order to get a smaller signature. In that case, the user can specify the smaller input weight to avoid overpaying transaction fees.
2022-01-24wallet: Allow user specified input size to overrideAndrew Chow
If the user specifies an input size, allow it to override any input size calculations during coin selection.
2022-01-24wallet: add input weights to CCoinControlAndrew Chow
In order to allow coin selection to take weights from the user, CCoinControl needs to be able to set and get them.
2022-01-24refactor: replace RecursiveMutex m_chainstate_mutex with Mutexw0xlt
2022-01-24refactor: add negative TS annotations for `m_chainstate_mutex`w0xlt
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-01-24Avoid unsigned integer overflow in bitcoin-txMarcoFalke
2022-01-24Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24102: mempool: Run coin.IsSpent only once in a rowMarcoFalke
fa2bcc4e42e7fed61727b3de4019e9702d4090ce Run coin.IsSpent only once in a row (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Follow-up to commit 64e4963c635ec3a73a5fa3f32f6ec08e70609f60 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23976#discussion_r787758193 ACKs for top commit: glozow: utACK fa2bcc4e42e7fed61727b3de4019e9702d4090ce, agree the assertion is sufficient theStack: Code-review ACK fa2bcc4e42e7fed61727b3de4019e9702d4090ce w0xlt: crACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24102/commits/fa2bcc4e42e7fed61727b3de4019e9702d4090ce shaavan: Code Review ACK fa2bcc4e42e7fed61727b3de4019e9702d4090ce brunoerg: crACK fa2bcc4e42e7fed61727b3de4019e9702d4090ce Tree-SHA512: 3be9d6b313bf6bb835f031826c81777b4659118d839001d084e72462391cb64ba81d06a5e07fd21fcfb709a71b08892b23212a98604ce8481da489476b72f072
2022-01-24Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24108: Replace RecursiveMutex `cs_addrLocal` with ↵MarcoFalke
Mutex, and rename it dec787d8ac2e8fb42db87431dd622bf44897bc4e refactor: replace RecursiveMutex `m_addr_local_mutex` with Mutex (w0xlt) 93609c1dfad70961697d0d12bf01cd34b8ceb6c8 p2p: add assertions and negative TS annotations for m_addr_local_mutex (w0xlt) c4a31ca267f74bff76a43878177d05d22825a203 scripted-diff: rename cs_addrLocal -> m_addr_local_mutex (w0xlt) Pull request description: This PR is related to #19303 and gets rid of the `RecursiveMutex cs_addrLocal`. ACKs for top commit: hebasto: ACK dec787d8ac2e8fb42db87431dd622bf44897bc4e, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged. shaavan: reACK dec787d8ac2e8fb42db87431dd622bf44897bc4e Tree-SHA512: b7a043bfd4e2ccbe313bff21ad815169db6ad215ca96daf358ce960c496a548b4a9e90be9e4357430ca59652b96df87c097450118996c6d4703cbaabde2072d0
2022-01-24gui: use available space to display "Last Transaction" in peer detailsJon Atack
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2025-03-15 14:32:10 +0000