Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0a50019fde7781263e0c8f041d1d9dcb0dee77e8 Walk pindexBestHeader back to ChainActive().Tip() if it is invalid (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Instead of keeping pindexBestHeader set to the best header we've
ever seen, reset it back to our validated tip if we find an ancestor
of it turns out to be invalid. While the name is now a bit confusing,
this matches much better with how it is used in practice, see below.
Further, this opens up more use-cases for it in the future, namely
aggressively searching for new peers in case we have discovered
(possibly via some covert channel) headers which we do not know to be
invalid, but which we cannot find block data for.
Places pindexBestHeader is used:
* Various GUI displays of the best header and getblockchaininfo["headers"],
I don't think changing this is bad, and if anything this is less confusing
in the presence of an invalid block.
* IsCurrentForFeeEstimation(): If anything I think ensuring pindexBestHeader
isn't some crazy invalid chain is better than the alternative, even in the
case where you are rejecting the current chain due to hardware error (since
hopefully in that case you won't get any new blocks anyway).
* ConnectBlock assumevalid checks: We use pindexBestHeader to check that the
block we're connecting leads to something with nMinimumChainWork (preventing
a user-set assumevalid from having bogus work) and that the block we're
connecting leads to pindexBestHeader (I'm not too worried about this one -
it's nice to "disable" assumevalid if we have a long invalid headers chain,
but I don't see it as a critical protection).
* BlockRequestAllowed() uses pindexBestHeader as its target to ensure the
requested block is within a month of the "current chain". I don't think this
is a meaningful difference, if we're rejecting the current tip we're
trivially fingerprintable anyway, and if the chain really does have a bunch
of invalid crap near the tip, using the best not-invalid header is likely a
better criteria.
* ProcessGetBlockData uses pindexBestHeader as the "current chain" definition
of whether a block request is "historical" for the purpose of bandwidth
limiting. Similarly, I don't see why this is a meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader for requesting missing headers on receipt of a
headers/compact block message or block inv as well as for initial getheaders.
I think this is definitely wrong, using the best not-invalid header for such
requests is much better.
* We use pindexBestHeader to define the "current chain" for deciding when
we're close to done with initial headers sync. I don't think this is a
meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader to decide if initial headers sync has timed out. If
we're rejecting the chain due to hardware error this may result in
additional cases where we ban a peer, but this is already true, so I think
its fine.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
ACK 0a50019fde7781263e0c8f041d1d9dcb0dee77e8
kallewoof:
ACK 0a50019fde7781263e0c8f041d1d9dcb0dee77e8
ariard:
utACK 0a50019
Tree-SHA512: 2ecfa973a9878a00313ae7ede94a9bd7710e0caf55b544b10bbc46dc463a0478cbaf477e6cdd072356d5a0c5fb3848e9339284af785a2995c20bae8bd23f23e5
|
|
bd5a02692853f7240a4fdc593d7d0123d7916e45 Make UpdateTransactionsFromBlock use Epochs (Jeremy Rubin)
2ccb7cca4ac67198ac89bd58f5b4ae41a5163ceb Add Epoch Guards to CTXMemPoolEntry and CTxMemPool (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
UpdateTransactionsFromBlock is called during a re-org. When a re-org occurs, all of the transactions in the mempool may be descendants from a transaction which is in the pre-reorg block. This can cause us to propagate updates, worst case, to every transaction in the mempool.
Because we construct a `setEntries setChildren`, which is backed by a `std::set`, it is possible that this algorithm is `O(N log N)`.
By using an Epoch visitor pattern, we can limit this to `O(N)` worst case behavior.
Epochs are also less resource intensive than almost any set option (e.g., hash set) because they are allocation free.
This PR is related to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17268, it is a small subset of the changes which have been refactored slightly to ease review. If this PR gets review & merge, I will follow up with more PRs (similar to #17268) to improve the mempool
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK bd5a02692853f7240a4fdc593d7d0123d7916e45
adamjonas:
Just to summarize for those looking to review - as of bd5a026 there are 3 ACKs (@sdaftuar, @ariard, and @hebasto) and one "looks good" from @ajtowns with no NACKs or any show-stopping concerns raised.
ajtowns:
ACK bd5a02692853f7240a4fdc593d7d0123d7916e45 (code review)
ariard:
Code review ACK bd5a026
hebasto:
ACK bd5a02692853f7240a4fdc593d7d0123d7916e45, modulo some nits and a typo.
Tree-SHA512: f0d2291085019ffb4e1119edeb9f4a89c1a572d1cb5b4bdf5743dd0152e721e1935f5155dcae84e1e5bda5ffdf6224c488c1e200bd33bedca9f5ca22d5f5139f
|
|
9a299a59cc8a9ab516e047356c5bc0e93774b557 net: reference instead of copy in BlockConnected range loop (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Reference elements in range for loop instead of copying them and
fix Clang `-Wrange-loop-analysis` warning introduced in a029e18
```
net_processing.cpp:1185:25: warning: loop variable 'ptx' of
type 'const std::shared_ptr<const CTransaction>' creates a copy from
type 'const std::shared_ptr<const CTransaction>' [-Wrange-loop-analysis]
for (const auto ptx : pblock->vtx) {
^
net_processing.cpp:1185:14: note: use reference type
'const std::shared_ptr<const CTransaction> &' to prevent copying
for (const auto ptx : pblock->vtx) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
```
ACKs for top commit:
Empact:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18054/commits/9a299a59cc8a9ab516e047356c5bc0e93774b557
MarcoFalke:
ACK 9a299a59cc8a9ab516e047356c5bc0e93774b557
promag:
ACK 9a299a59cc8a9ab516e047356c5bc0e93774b557.
elichai:
ACK 9a299a59cc8a9ab516e047356c5bc0e93774b557
emilengler:
ACK 9a299a5.
Tree-SHA512: 9284d1b00684877505454a05071212758c8cea083534e2eec09bfc8a9c3059eea811d2008f6a5a678539444f0d5b3134db1bd23da6514b3d3a1440634c8b53be
|
|
to fix -Wrange-loop-analysis warning introduced in a029e18
|
|
d3bc18408146e91b3836f72360ff6fa2420b6887 doc: update release notes with getaddressinfo label deprecation (Jon Atack)
72af93f36479dc12d795f1d05fa3d8fbd9b293bd test: getaddressinfo label deprecation test (Jon Atack)
d48875fa20d0b71b978cb3d1f85dd9ec14e664cc rpc: deprecate getaddressinfo label field (Jon Atack)
dc0cabeda49a7edbfa71df22846721b6f6224aea test: remove getaddressinfo label tests (Jon Atack)
c7654af6f830577a54df12b5d65df93532db0dc2 doc: address pr17578 review feedback (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #17578 (now merged) and deprecates the rpc getaddressinfo `label` field. The deprecated behavior can be re-enabled by starting bitcoind with `-deprecatedrpc=label`.
See http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-11-22.html#l-622 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17283#issuecomment-554458001 for more context.
Reviewers: This PR may be tested manually by building, then running bitcoind with and without the `-deprecatedrpc=label` flag while verifying the rpc getaddressinfo output and help text.
Next step: add support for multiple labels.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK d3bc18408146e91b3836f72360ff6fa2420b6887
laanwj:
ACK d3bc18408146e91b3836f72360ff6fa2420b6887
meshcollider:
utACK d3bc18408146e91b3836f72360ff6fa2420b6887
Tree-SHA512: f954402884ec54977def332c8160fd892f289b0d2aee1e91fed9ac3220f7e5b1f7fc6421b84cc7a5c824a0582eca4e6fc194e4e33ddd378c733c8941ac45f56d
|
|
cb8a86d9f952401eaad68b2e3818ce50f7befd91 gui: Remove WalletView and BitcoinGUI circular dependency (João Barbosa)
ac3d10777d65b68862c6deb57594c8fc4d21ca77 gui: Add transactionClicked and coinsSent signals to WalletView (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Essentially moves the code in `WalletView::setBitcoinGUI` to the only caller. Two new signals are added beforehand in the first commit so that the connections in `WalletFrame` are all from the wallet view.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK cb8a86d9f952401eaad68b2e3818ce50f7befd91, tested on Linux Mint 19.3.
jonasschnelli:
utACK cb8a86d9f952401eaad68b2e3818ce50f7befd91
Tree-SHA512: 250316cd3689e51c8cded9ccd75963c836dcafa6db25d684f2aa691dea9738895f9140793e0f925784909e39f8257f7e1c7d611e8bd6d6634e1a50333f4ddb1e
|
|
3aee10b80b9d9a0f5172fc2ee75f03a37d5c3863 gui: Drop ShutdownWindow dependency to BitcoinGUI (João Barbosa)
61eb058cc10592cfa314ba2209fb370706100e8b gui: Drop BanTableModel dependency to ClientModel (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
`ShutdownWindow::showShutdownWindow` just needs a widget to center the shutdown window and to borrow its title.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 3aee10b80b9d9a0f5172fc2ee75f03a37d5c3863, since previous review only suggested change `QWidget` --> `QMainWindow`
jonasschnelli:
utACK 3aee10b80b9d9a0f5172fc2ee75f03a37d5c3863
Tree-SHA512: e15cb6ee274730bd071d3d97b540c5059e5c655248d69a37c3fd00f2aacc6cfcb36b9a65755718027e15482ec8e5e85534c1dc13d0ddb4e0680df03fbf6571f2
|
|
check
a029e18c2bf67dd00552b0f4bbc85fa2fa5b973b Use rolling bloom filter of recent block tx's for AlreadyHave() check (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
In order to determine whether to download or process a relayed transaction, we first try to check whether we already have the transaction -- either in the mempool, in our filter of recently rejected transactions, in our orphan pool, or already confirmed in a block.
Prior to this commit, the heuristic for checking whether a transaction was confirmed in a block is based on whether there's a coin cache entry corresponding to the 0- or 1-index vout of the tx. While that is a quick check, it is very imprecise (eg if those outputs were already spent in another block, we wouldn't detect that the transaction has already been confirmed) -- we can do better by just keeping a rolling bloom filter of the transactions in recent blocks, which will better capture the case of a transaction which has been confirmed and then fully spent.
This should reduce the bandwidth that we waste by requesting transactions which will not be accepted to the mempool.
To avoid relay problems for transactions which have been included in a recent block but then reorged out of the chain, we clear the bloom filter whenever a block is disconnected.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK a029e18c2b only stylistic and comment fixups 🍴
sipa:
utACK a029e18c2bf67dd00552b0f4bbc85fa2fa5b973b
jonatack:
Code review ACK a029e18c2bf67dd00552b0f4bbc85fa2fa5b973b also built/ran tests and am running bitcoind with mempool debug logging and custom logging. Looked a bit into CRollingBloomFilter and also the mempool median time past checks mentioned above; I don't have a deep understanding of those areas yet but the concept here and changes LGTM. Tests and other optimisations could be added as a follow-up. In favor of seeing this move forward if no major immediate concerns.
Tree-SHA512: 784c9a35bcd3af5db469063ac7d26b4bac430e451e5637a34d8a538c3ffd1433abdd3f06e5584e7a84bfa9e791449e61819397b5a6c7890fa59d78ec3ba507b2
|
|
|
|
|
|
b951b0973cfd4e0db4607a00d434a04afb0d6199 on startup, write config options to debug.log (Larry Ruane)
Pull request description:
When a developer is examining `debug.log` after something goes wrong, it's often useful to know the exact options the failing instance of `bitcoind` was started with. Sometimes the `debug.log` file is all that's available for the analysis. This PR logs the `bitcoin.conf` entries and command-line arguments to `debug.log` on startup.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK b951b0973cfd4e0db4607a00d434a04afb0d6199 🐪
jonatack:
ACK b951b0973c reviewed diff, re-code review, built, ran tests, launched bitcoind and reviewed debug log output, verified value of `str` debug log in the added unit test.
Tree-SHA512: bbca4fb3d49f99261758302bde0b8b67300ccc72e7380b01f1f66a146ae8a008a045df0ca5ca9664caff034d0ee38ea7ef38a50f38374525608c07ba52790358
|
|
cc668d06fb71463fd406df761b0e89e25d4de968 tests: Add fuzzing harness for strprintf(...) (practicalswift)
ccc3c76e2b5d28a2372ae5752c08256396bf43e6 tests: Add fuzzer strprintf to FUZZERS_MISSING_CORPORA (temporarily) (practicalswift)
6ef04912af7f216f3112e0e9919f67e36415a792 tests: Update FuzzedDataProvider.h from upstream (LLVM) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harness for `strprintf(…)`.
Update `FuzzedDataProvider.h`.
Avoid hitting some issues in tinyformat (reported upstreams in https://github.com/c42f/tinyformat/issues/70).
---
Found issues in tinyformat:
**Issue 1.** The following causes a signed integer overflow followed by an allocation of 9 GB of RAM (or an OOM in memory constrained environments):
```
strprintf("%.777777700000000$", 1.0);
```
**Issue 2.** The following causes a stack overflow:
```
strprintf("%987654321000000:", 1);
```
**Issue 3.** The following causes a stack overflow:
```
strprintf("%1$*1$*", -11111111);
```
**Issue 4.** The following causes a `NULL` pointer dereference:
```
strprintf("%.1s", (char *)nullptr);
```
**Issue 5.** The following causes a float cast overflow:
```
strprintf("%c", -1000.0);
```
**Issue 6.** The following causes a float cast overflow followed by an invalid integer negation:
```
strprintf("%*", std::numeric_limits<double>::lowest());
```
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 9b765559281470f4983eb5aeca94bab1b15ec9837c0ee01a20f4348e9335e4ee4e4fecbd7a1a5a8ac96aabe0f9eeb597b8fc9a2c8faf1bab386e8225d5cdbc18
|
|
1b96a3cd1ebe725896f59614903184289fe62cf8 tests: reset fIsBareMultisigStd after bare-multisig tests (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #18015
The bug this fixes is two-part.
1. The `fIsBareMultisigStd` global is being reused by other tests,
such as [script_p2sh_tests(set)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/test/script_p2sh_tests.cpp#L150), after being set to false.
2. The order our tests run in doesn't always? seem to be random,
which meant that the `script_p2sh` tests would only fail if they
were run in an order where the `transaction_tests` ran first,
mutating the `fIsBareMultisigStd` global.
This doesn't seem to happen when running make check, but if you
run `src/test/test_bitcoin and pass --random=99999`, the failure
in `script_p2sh` will occur (on most, but maybe not all systems):
```bash
src/test/test_bitcoin --random=99999
Running 389 test cases...
test/script_p2sh_tests.cpp:200: error: in "script_p2sh_tests/set": txTo[1].IsStandard
test/script_p2sh_tests.cpp:200: error: in "script_p2sh_tests/set": txTo[2].IsStandard
test/script_p2sh_tests.cpp:200: error: in "script_p2sh_tests/set": txTo[3].IsStandard
*** 3 failures are detected in the test module "Bitcoin Core Test Suite"
```
The new test for bare multisig was introduced in #17502.
ACKs for top commit:
Empact:
Code Review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18018/commits/1b96a3cd1ebe725896f59614903184289fe62cf8
theStack:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18018/commits/1b96a3cd1ebe725896f59614903184289fe62c
Tree-SHA512: fd7578f9f3faa44d236cd007fc25e31f061acabdb8458559fde0e67d11ab5cafed15305993270c9943a50326574bc5f5301b09494a5b0d2de69e64978093ed45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
have multiple
3f373659d732a5b1e5fdc692a45b2b8179f66bec Refactor: Replace SigningProvider pointers with unique_ptrs (Andrew Chow)
3afe53c4039103670cec5f9cace897ead76e20a8 Cleanup: Drop unused GUI learnRelatedScripts method (Andrew Chow)
e2f02aa59e3402048269362ff692d49a6df35cfd Refactor: Copy CWallet signals and print function to LegacyScriptPubKeyMan (Andrew Chow)
c729afd0a3b74a3943e4c359270beaf3e6ff8a7b Box the wallet: Add multiple keyman maps and loops (Andrew Chow)
4977c30d59e88a3e5ee248144bcc023debcd895b refactor: define a UINT256_ONE global constant (Andrew Chow)
415afcccd3e5583defdb76e3a280f48e98983301 HD Split: Avoid redundant upgrades (Andrew Chow)
01b4511206e399981a77976deb15785d18db46ae Make UpgradeKeyMetadata work only on LegacyScriptPubKeyMan (Andrew Chow)
4a7e43e8460127a40a7895519587399feff3b682 Store p2sh scripts in AddAndGetDestinationForScript (Andrew Chow)
501acb5538008d98abe79288b92040bc186b93f3 Always try to sign for all pubkeys in multisig (Andrew Chow)
81610eddbc57c46ae243f45d73e715d509f53a6c List output types in an array in order to be iterated over (Andrew Chow)
eb81fc3ee58d3e88af36d8091b9e4017a8603b3c Refactor: Allow LegacyScriptPubKeyMan to be null (Andrew Chow)
fadc08ad944cad42e805228cdd58e0332f4d7184 Locking: Lock cs_KeyStore instead of cs_wallet in legacy keyman (Andrew Chow)
f5be479694d4dbaf59eef562d80fbeacb3bb7dc1 wallet: Improve CWallet:MarkDestinationsDirty (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Continuation of wallet boxes project.
Actually makes ScriptPubKeyMan an interface which LegacyScriptPubkeyMan. Moves around functions and things from CWallet into LegacyScriptPubKeyMan so that they are actually separate things without circular dependencies.
***
Introducing the `ScriptPubKeyMan` (short for ScriptPubKeyManager) for managing scriptPubKeys and their associated scripts and keys. This functionality is moved over from `CWallet`. Instead, `CWallet` will have a pointer to a `ScriptPubKeyMan` for every possible address type, internal and external. It will fetch the correct `ScriptPubKeyMan` as necessary. When fetching new addresses, it chooses the `ScriptPubKeyMan` based on address type and whether it is change. For signing, it takes the script and asks each `ScriptPubKeyMan` for whether that `ScriptPubKeyMan` considers that script `IsMine`, whether it has that script, or whether it is able to produce a signature for it. If so, the `ScriptPubKeyMan` will provide a `SigningProvider` to the caller which will use that in order to sign.
There is currently one `ScriptPubKeyMan` - the `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan`. Each `CWallet` will have only one `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` with the pointers for all of the address types and change pointing to this `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan`. It is created when the wallet is loaded and all keys and metadata are loaded into it instead of `CWallet`. The `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` is primarily made up of all of the key and script management that used to be in `CWallet`. For convenience, `CWallet` has a `GetLegacyScriptPubKeyMan` which will return the `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` or a `nullptr` if it does not have one (not yet implemented, but callers will check for the `nullptr`). For purposes of signing, `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan`'s `GetSigningProvider` will return itself rather than a separate `SigningProvider`. This will be different for future `ScriptPubKeyMan`s.
The `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` will also handle the importing and exporting of keys and scripts instead of `CWallet`. As such, a number of RPCs have been limited to work only if a `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` can be retrieved from the wallet. These RPCs are `sethdseed`, `addmultisigaddress`, `importaddress`, `importprivkey`, `importpubkey`, `importmulti`, `dumpprivkey`, and `dumpwallet`. Other RPCs which relied on the wallet for scripts and keys have been modified in order to take the `SigningProvider` retrieved from the `ScriptPubKeyMan` for a given script.
Overall, these changes should not effect how everything actually works and the user should experience no difference between having this change and not having it. As such, no functional tests were changed, and the only unit tests changed were those that were directly accessing `CWallet` functions that have been removed.
This PR is the last step in the [Wallet Structure Changes](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Class-Structure-Changes).
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
re-utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17261/commits/3f373659d732a5b1e5fdc692a45b2b8179f66bec
Sjors:
re-utACK 3f373659d732a5b1e5fdc692a45b2b8179f66bec (it still compiles on macOS after https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17261#discussion_r370377070)
meshcollider:
Tested re-ACK 3f373659d732a5b1e5fdc692a45b2b8179f66bec
Tree-SHA512: f8e2b8d9efa750b617691e8702d217ec4c33569ec2554a060141d9eb9b9a3a5323e4216938e2485c44625d7a6e0925d40dea1362b3af9857cf08860c2f344716
|
|
The bug this fixes is two-part.
1.The fIsBareMultisigStd global is being reused by other tests,
i.e script_p2sh_tests(set), after being set to false.
2. The order our tests run in doesn't always? seem to be random,
which meant that the script_p2sh tests would only fail if they
were run in an order where transaction_tests ran first, mutating
the fIsBareMultisigStd global.
This doesn't seem to happen when running make check, but if you
run src/test/test_bitcoin and pass --random=99999, the failure
in script_p2sh:
test/script_p2sh_tests.cpp:200: error: in "script_p2sh_tests/set": txTo[1].IsStandard
will occur (on most systems).
The new test was introduced in 1bb5d517aa616c1d5b5801d2ea36a2de5fb61eba.
|
|
|
|
f41d58966995fe69df433fa684117fae74a56e66 Document better -keypool as a look-ahead safety mechanism (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
If after a backup, an address is issued beyond the initial
keypool range and none of the addresses in this range
is seen onchain, if a wallet is restored from backup, even in
case of rescan, funds may be loss due to the look-ahead
buffer not being incremented and so restored wallet not detecting
onchain out-of-range address as derived from its seed.
This scenario is theoretically unavoidable due to the requirement
of the keypool to have a max size. However, given the default
keypool size, this is unlikely. Document better keypool size
implications to avoid user setting a too low value.
While reviewing #17681, it took me a while to figure out the safety implications of keypool, I find it would be better to document this a bit farther to avoid users shooting themselves in the foot. For further context & discussion, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17681#issuecomment-563613452
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f41d58966995fe69df433fa684117fae74a56e66. Just "Warning:" prefix added since the last review
jonatack:
ACK f41d58966995fe69df433fa684117fae74a56e66 code review and build/test. The added `Warning:` since last review is a good addition.
Tree-SHA512: d3d0ee88fcdfc5c8841a2bd4bada0e4eeb412a0dce5054e5fb023643c2fa57206a0f3efb06890c245528dc4431413ed2fd5645b9319d26245d044c490b7f0db0
|
|
In order to determine whether to download or process a relayed transaction, we
try to determine if we already have the transaction, either in the mempool, in
our recently rejected filter, in our orphan pool, or already confirmed in the
chain itself.
Prior to this commit, the heuristic for checking the chain is based on whether
there's an output corresponding to the 0- or 1-index vout in our coin cache.
While that is a quick check, it is very imprecise (say if those outputs were
already spent in a block) -- we can do better by just keeping a rolling bloom
filter of the transactions in recent blocks, which will capture the case of a
transaction which has been confirmed and then fully spent already.
To avoid relay problems for transactions which have been included in a recent
block but then reorged out of the chain, we clear the bloom filter whenever a
block is disconnected.
|
|
4de934b9b5b4be1bac8fe205f4ee9a79e772dc34 Convert compression.h to new serialization framework (Pieter Wuille)
ca34c5cba5fbb9b046b074a234f06ecf6ed5d610 Add FORMATTER_METHODS, similar to SERIALIZE_METHODS, but for formatters (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is the next piece of the puzzle from #10785. It includes:
* The `FORMATTER_METHODS` macro, similar to `SERIALIZE_METHODS`, for defining a formatter with a unified serialization/deserialization implementation.
* Updating `compression.h` to consist of 3 formatters, rather than old-style wrappers (`ScriptCompression`, `AmountCompression`, `TxOutCompression`).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 4de934b9b5b4be1bac8fe205f4ee9a79e772dc34
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 4de934b9b5b4be1bac8fe205f4ee9a79e772dc34. Only change since last review is removing REF usages
Tree-SHA512: d52ca21eb1ce87d9bc3c90d00c905bd4fada522759aaa144c02a58b4d738d5e8647c0558b8ce393c707f6e3c4d20bf93781a2dcc1e1dcbd276d9b5ffd0e02cd6
|
|
3c1bc40205a3fcab606e70b0e3c13d68b2860e34 Add extra logging of asmap use and bucketing (Gleb Naumenko)
e4658aa8eaf1629dd5af8cf7b9717a8e72028251 Return mapped AS in RPC call getpeerinfo (Gleb Naumenko)
ec45646de9e62b3d42c85716bfeb06d8f2b507dc Integrate ASN bucketing in Addrman and add tests (Gleb Naumenko)
8feb4e4b667361bf23344149c01594abebd56fdb Add asmap utility which queries a mapping (Gleb Naumenko)
Pull request description:
This PR attempts to solve the problem explained in #16599.
A particular attack which encouraged us to work on this issue is explained here [[Erebus Attack against Bitcoin Peer-to-Peer Network](https://erebus-attack.comp.nus.edu.sg/)] (by @muoitranduc)
Instead of relying on /16 prefix to diversify the connections every node creates, we would instead rely on the (ip -> ASN) mapping, if this mapping is provided.
A .map file can be created by every user independently based on a router dump, or provided along with the Bitcoin release. Currently we use the python scripts written by @sipa to create a .map file, which is no larger than 2MB (awesome!).
Here I suggest adding a field to peers.dat which would represent a hash of asmap file used while serializing addrman (or 0 for /16 prefix legacy approach).
In this case, every time the file is updated (or grouping method changed), all buckets will be re-computed.
I believe that alternative selective re-bucketing for only updated ranges would require substantial changes.
TODO:
- ~~more unit tests~~
- ~~find a way to test the code without including >1 MB mapping file in the repo.~~
- find a way to check that mapping file is not corrupted (checksum?)
- comments and separate tests for asmap.cpp
- make python code for .map generation public
- figure out asmap distribution (?)
~Interesting corner case: I’m using std::hash to compute a fingerprint of asmap, and std::hash returns size_t. I guess if a user updates the OS to 64-bit, then the hash of asap will change? Does it even matter?~
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK 3c1bc40205a3fcab606e70b0e3c13d68b2860e34
jamesob:
ACK 3c1bc40205a3fcab606e70b0e3c13d68b2860e34 ([`jamesob/ackr/16702.3.naumenkogs.p2p_supplying_and_using`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/16702.3.naumenkogs.p2p_supplying_and_using))
jonatack:
ACK 3c1bc40205a3fcab606e70b0e3c13d68b2860e34
Tree-SHA512: e2dc6171188d5cdc2ab2c022fa49ed73a14a0acb8ae4c5ffa970172a0365942a249ad3d57e5fb134bc156a3492662c983f74bd21e78d316629dcadf71576800c
|
|
b35567fe0ba3e6f8d8f9525088eb8ee62065ad01 test: only declare a main() when fuzzing with AFL (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This fixes fuzzing using [libFuzzer](https://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html) on macOS, which caused a few issues during the recent review club. macOS users could only fuzz using afl, or inside a VM.
It seems that the `__attribute__((weak))` marking is not quite enough to properly mark `main()` as weak on macOS. See Apples docs on [Frameworks and Weak Linking](https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/BPFrameworks/Concepts/WeakLinking.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/20002378-107262-CJBJAEID).
Have tested fuzzing using libFuzzer and AFL with this patch.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK b35567fe0ba3e6f8d8f9525088eb8ee62065ad01
fjahr:
ACK b35567f
Tree-SHA512: b881fdd98c7e1587fcf44debd31f5e7a52df938059ab91c41d0785077b3329b793e051a2bf2eee64488b9f6029d9288c911052ec23ab3ab8c0561a2be1682dae
|
|
e80317be5fc6f6a04ea3b35bfe9991b3a5d29f7a refactor: Remove redundant conditional (Bushstar)
Pull request description:
Conditional check against fMaster is now redundant as it is already checked as true. This originally made sense as the outer conditional was:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/f9cae832e6f56c6abe89b3bf05d1f176c2a7c913/src/checkqueue.h#L86
Removal of fQuit happened in the commit below.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/30ded3e3d888f75b6fa8b2e55a3883f799e00775#diff-88316c9aa9514c038c9304297e672da5
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/e80317be5fc6f6a04ea3b35bfe9991b3a5d29f7a
hebasto:
ACK e80317be5fc6f6a04ea3b35bfe9991b3a5d29f7a, I have reviewed the code, and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
promag:
ACK e80317be5fc6f6a04ea3b35bfe9991b3a5d29f7a.
emilengler:
re-ACK e80317be5fc6f6a04ea3b35bfe9991b3a5d29f7a
practicalswift:
ACK e80317be5fc6f6a04ea3b35bfe9991b3a5d29f7a
Empact:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17971/commits/e80317be5fc6f6a04ea3b35bfe9991b3a5d29f7a
Tree-SHA512: 136ea1d02e3d65100a8758730617ccede7864e08e8404e42e65d45d4bf95a3bfea2ab9895c6e8833abd654557d3efbba02b25297a2a5eefc36a11e97bbe9134f
|
|
deaa6dd144f5650b385658a0c4f9a014aff8dde2 psbt: check output index is within bounds before accessing (Andrew Chow)
f1ef7f0aa46338f4cd8de79696027a1bf868f359 Don't calculate tx fees for PSBTs with invalid money values (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Fixes #17149
Two classes of issues were found by the psbt fuzzer: values out of range and causing overflows, and prevout indexes being out of range. This PR fixes both.
When accessing a specific output using the index given in the tx, check that it is actually a possible output before trying to access the output.
When summing and checking amounts for `decodepsbt` and `analyzepsbt`, make sure that the values are actually valid money values.. Otherwise, stop summing and don't show the fee. For `analyzepsbt`, return that the next role is the Creator since the Creator needs to remake the transaction to be valid.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK deaa6dd144f5650b385658a0c4f9a014aff8dde2 -- only change since last ACK was the addition of tests
gwillen:
tested ACK deaa6dd, would also like to see this merged!
Tree-SHA512: 06c36720bbb5a7ab1c29f7d15878bf9f0d3e5760c06bff479d412e1bf07bb3e0e9ab6cca820a4bfedaab71bfd7af813807e87cbcdf0af25cc3f66a53a06dbcfd
|
|
libFuzzer will provide a main(). This also fixes a weak linking
issue when fuzzing with libFuzzer on macOS.
|
|
|
|
Quoting src/test/README.md, 'Adding test cases':
"The file naming convention is `<source_filename>_tests.cpp`
and such files should wrap their tests in a test suite
called `<source_filename>_tests`."
Currently the unit test source file txvalidationcache_tests.cpp contains a unit
test suite with the name tx_validationcache_tests, which is fixed by this commit.
The following shell script shows that this is the only mismatch and for all other
unit test source files the test suite names are correct:
#!/bin/bash
shopt -s globstar
for test_full_filename in **/*_tests.cpp; do
test_name_file=`basename $test_full_filename .cpp`
test_name_suite=`sed -n "s/^.*TEST_SUITE(\(.*_tests\).*$/\1/p" $test_full_filename`
if [ $test_name_file != $test_name_suite ]; then
echo "TestFilename: $test_name_file != TestSuitname: $test_name_suite"
fi
done
|
|
|
|
Upstream revision: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/a44ef027ebca1598892ea9b104d6189aeb3bc2f0/compiler-rt/include/fuzzer/FuzzedDataProvider.h
|
|
4f7127d1e3a51f0f55d42a08439c516dcc8d1a26 gui: Make Intro consistent with prune checkbox (Hennadii Stepanov)
4824a7d36cf47e766865e0fefe952ec860eb82dd gui: Add Intro::UpdateFreeSpaceLabel() (Hennadii Stepanov)
daa3f3fa9071a229275dd6a1b8445237ddc3fa97 refactor: Add Intro::UpdatePruneLabels() (Hennadii Stepanov)
e4caa82a03df5c6a6d5d29f34ab006d732c6dac1 refactor: Replace static variable with data member (Hennadii Stepanov)
2bede28cd9ec638d8bb32c187ccf12d89345218e util: Add PruneGBtoMiB() function (Hennadii Stepanov)
e35e4b2ba052c9a533626286026dbe0a2d546c5b util: Add PruneMiBtoGB() function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (a6f6333ba253cda83221ee529810cacf930e413f) and on 0.19.0.1 the intro dialog with prune enabled (checkbox "Discard blocks..." is checked) provides a user with wrong info about the required disk space:
![DeepinScreenshot_bitcoin-qt_20191208112228](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32963518/70387510-8daab400-19ae-11ea-9338-29add9c31118.png)
Also the paragraph "If you have chosen to limit..." is missed.
---
With this PR when prune checkbox is toggled, the related text labels and the amount of required space shown are updated (previously they were only updated when the data directory was updated):
![Screenshot from 2019-12-08 11-34-53](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32963518/70387542-eed28780-19ae-11ea-9565-49d8a64b2f33.png)
---
This PR is an alternative to #17035.
**ryanofsky**'s [suggestion](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17035#discussion_r337594268) also has been implemented.
ACKs for top commit:
emilengler:
ACK 4f7127d1e3a51f0f55d42a08439c516dcc8d1a26
Sjors:
tACK 4f7127d1e3a51f0f55d42a08439c516dcc8d1a26
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 4f7127d1e3a51f0f55d42a08439c516dcc8d1a26. It seems like there are a few visible changes here:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 4f7127d1e3a51f0f55d42a08439c516dcc8d1a26
Tree-SHA512: fa0bbdcfafde97d7906cda066cbd4608b936a71cae1b4cda3ee3aa2eed3a9795f279f14c6b1b4997278e094db891c7d3bb695368ba0882347aa42165a86e5172
|
|
re-shown if another wallet is open
4c524f0aad11b44baa56d2b2e432bbddffff74c2 Bugfix: GUI: Hide the HD/encrypt icons earlier so they get re-shown if another wallet is open (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
To reproduce bug, open 2 wallets, and close 1. You end up left without the HD/encrypt icons, despite having a wallet open still.
This works because the icons are re-shown after we remove the current wallet (if there's another wallet still open).
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Tested ACK 4c524f0aad11b44baa56d2b2e432bbddffff74c2.
jonasschnelli:
utACK 4c524f0aad11b44baa56d2b2e432bbddffff74c2
hebasto:
ACK 4c524f0aad11b44baa56d2b2e432bbddffff74c2, tested on Linux Mint 19.3.
Tree-SHA512: 4ef1bd4a0ae2f20ace9d02bc5d778640c11e46a86f30b762f8502e577f85114f0644d51a70cfbc4c23b51869c3caf20e94548aa64f51fdb85aea5f194a23fca6
|
|
44f15cfdcfc64d5a0c36fded39e4aef49415b11b gui: renamed 'debug window' to 'node window' (Zero)
Pull request description:
**Edit**: I have now limited the change in this PR to only renaming the window title from `Debug Window` to `Node Window`. Check [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17096#issuecomment-542837511) for more details.
This PR is in response to #17082, which aims to rename the `Debug window` title to a more user friendly term; `Node window`.
Closes #17082
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 44f15cfdcfc64d5a0c36fded39e4aef49415b11b, tested on Linux Mint 19.3:
theStack:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/44f15cfdcfc64d5a0c36fded39e4aef49415b11b, tested on Linux (Lubuntu 16.04):
Tree-SHA512: 9fc73f2e67badb38525c550ce4c313288858b3fde30ef17fee85230be5bf31cf94408c699265b5e1256dfed60f8d04f48927d9b2831ba9f25498b98e6fa7180f
|
|
another wallet is open
|
|
|
|
Needed for future ScriptPubKeyMans which may need to create
SigningProviders dynamically and thus a normal pointer is not enough
This commit does not change behavior.
|
|
This commit does not change behavior.
|
|
This commit does not change behavior.
|
|
Add wallet logic for dealing with multiple ScriptPubKeyMan instances. This
doesn't change current behavior because there is still only a single
LegacyScriptPubKeyMan. But in the future the new logic will be used to support
descriptor wallets.
|
|
Instead of having a uint256 representations of one scattered throughout
where it is used, define it globally in uint256.h
|
|
This avoids repeaded upgrades when support for more multiple keyman references
is added in the next commit:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16341#discussion_r322370108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|