aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-07-20Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22499: Update assumed chain paramsfanquake
eeddd1c8fa96cf546b0bf92063cefa4fd8c6b415 Update assumed chain params (Sriram) Pull request description: Update the relevant variables in `src/chainparams.cpp` for `mainnet`, `testnet`, and `signet` as given [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-process.md#before-branch-off). To review this PR, check out [this guide](https://github.com/fanquake/core-review/blob/master/update-assumevalid.md). Note: added a 10% overhead to the base value of `mainnet` in `m_assumed_blockchain_size` ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK eeddd1c8fa96cf546b0bf92063cefa4fd8c6b415, checked against my node 🌮 bfolkens: ACK eeddd1c - checked against `mainnet` achow101: Code Review ACK eeddd1c8fa96cf546b0bf92063cefa4fd8c6b415 0xB10C: ACK mainnet, testnet, and signet eeddd1c8fa96cf546b0bf92063cefa4fd8c6b415 jamesob: ACK eeddd1c8fa96cf546b0bf92063cefa4fd8c6b415 ([`jamesob/ackr/22499.1.sriramdvt.update_assumed_chain_par`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/22499.1.sriramdvt.update_assumed_chain_par)) darosior: ACK eeddd1c8fa96cf546b0bf92063cefa4fd8c6b415 mainnet and testnet Tree-SHA512: 0ab19d2acc6a854c6aa38fba199d61c68cec40f005d1d54341ea32b59aae9b7d1aabfd21d7c0bc79f54be99d3e71d1d727196cab88f370259fd2c6e002d3e43c
2021-07-20Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22492: wallet: Reorder locks in dumpwallet to avoid ↵MarcoFalke
lock order assertion 9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4 tests: Test for dumpwallet lock order issue (Andrew Chow) 25d99e6511d8c43b2025a89bcd8295de755346a7 Reorder dumpwallet so that cs_main functions go first (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: When a wallet is loaded which has an unconfirmed transaction in the mempool, it will end up establishing the lock order of cs_wallet -> cs_main -> cs_KeyStore. If `dumpwallet` is used on this wallet, then a lock order of cs_wallet -> cs_KeyStore -> cs_main will be used, which causes a lock order assertion. This PR fixes this by reordering `dumpwallet` and `GetKeyBirthTimes` (only used by `dumpwallet`). Specifically, in both functions, the function calls which lock cs_main are done prior to locking cs_KeyStore. This avoids the lock order issue. Additionally, I have added a test case to `wallet_dump.py`. Of course testing this requires `--enable-debug`. Fixes #22489 ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4 🎰 ryanofsky: Code review ACK 9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4. Nice to reduce lock scope, and good test! prayank23: tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22492/commits/9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4 lsilva01: Tested ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22492/commits/9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4 under the same conditions reported in issue #22489 and the `dumpwallet` command completed successfully. Tree-SHA512: d370a8f415ad64ee6a538ff419155837bcdbb167e3831b06572562289239028c6b46d80b23d227286afe875d9351f3377574ed831549ea426fb926af0e19c755
2021-07-20Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22261: [p2p/mempool] Two small fixes to node broadcast ↵fanquake
logic 5a77abd4e657458852875a07692898982f4b1db5 [style] Clean up BroadcastTransaction() (John Newbery) 7282d4c0363ab5152baa34af626cb49afbfddc32 [test] Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions (glozow) cd48372b67d961fe661990a2c6d3cc3d91478924 [mempool] Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions (John Newbery) 847b6ed48d7bacec9024618922e9b339d2d97676 [test] Test transactions are not re-added to unbroadcast set (Duncan Dean) 2837a9f1eaa2c6bf402d1d9891d9aa84c4a56033 [mempool] Only add a transaction to the unbroadcast set when it's added to the mempool (John Newbery) Pull request description: 1. Only add a transaction to the unbroadcast set when it's added to the mempool Currently, if BroadcastTransaction() is called to rebroadcast a transaction (e.g. by ResendWalletTransactions()), then we add the transaction to the unbroadcast set. That transaction has already been broadcast in the past, so peers are unlikely to request it again, meaning RemoveUnbroadcastTx() won't be called and it won't be removed from m_unbroadcast_txids. Net processing will therefore continue to attempt rebroadcast for the transaction every 10-15 minutes. This will most likely continue until the node connects to a new peer which hasn't yet seen the transaction (or perhaps indefinitely). Fix by only adding the transaction to the broadcast set when it's added to the mempool. 2. Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions There is some slightly unexpected behaviour when: - there is already transaction in the mempool (the "mempool tx") - BroadcastTransaction() is called for a transaction with the same txid as the mempool transaction but a different witness (the "new tx") Prior to this commit, if BroadcastTransaction() is called with relay=true, then it'll call RelayTransaction() using the txid/wtxid of the new tx, not the txid/wtxid of the mempool tx. For wtxid relay peers, in SendMessages(), the wtxid of the new tx will be taken from setInventoryTxToSend, but will then be filtered out from the vector of wtxids to announce, since m_mempool.info() won't find the transaction (the mempool contains the mempool tx, which has a different wtxid from the new tx). Fix this by calling RelayTransaction() with the wtxid of the mempool transaction in this case. The third commit is a comment/whitespace only change to tidy up the BroadcastTransaction() function. ACKs for top commit: duncandean: reACK 5a77abd naumenkogs: ACK 5a77abd4e657458852875a07692898982f4b1db5 theStack: re-ACK 5a77abd4e657458852875a07692898982f4b1db5 lsilva01: re-ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22261/commits/5a77abd4e657458852875a07692898982f4b1db5 Tree-SHA512: d1a46d32a9f975220e5b432ff6633fac9be01ea41925b4958395b8d641680500dc44476b12d18852e5b674d2d87e4d0160b4483e45d3d149176bdff9f4dc8516
2021-07-20Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22096: p2p: AddrFetch - don't disconnect on ↵fanquake
self-announcements 5730a43703f7e5a5ca26245ba3b55fbdd027d0b6 test: Add functional test for AddrFetch connections (Martin Zumsande) c34ad3309f93979b274a37de013502b05d25fad8 net, rpc: Enable AddrFetch connections for functional testing (Martin Zumsande) 533500d9072b7d5a36a6491784bdeb9247e91fb0 p2p: Add timeout for AddrFetch peers (Martin Zumsande) b6c5d1e450dde6a54bd785504c923adfb45c7060 p2p: AddrFetch - don't disconnect on self-announcements (Martin Zumsande) Pull request description: AddrFetch connections (old name: oneshots) are intended to be short-lived connections on which we ask a peer for addresses via `getaddr` and disconnect after receiving them. This is done by disconnecting after receiving the first `addr`. However, it is no longer working as intended, because nowadays, the first `addr` a typical bitcoin core node sends is its self-announcement. So we'll disconnect before the peer gets a chance to answer our `getaddr`. I checked that this affects both `-seednode` peers specified manually, and DNS seeds when AddrFetch is used as a fallback if DNS doesn't work for us. The current behavior of getting peers via AddrFetch when starting with an empty addrman would be to connect to the peer, receive its self-announcement and add it to addrman, disconnect, reconnect to the same peer again as a full outbound (no other addresses in addrman) and then receive more `addr`. This is silly and not in line with AddrFetch peer being intended to be short-lived peers.  Fix this by only disconnecting after receiving an `addr` message of size > 1. [Edit] As per review discussion, this PR now also adds a timeout after which we disconnect if we haven't received any suitable `addr`, and a functional test. ACKs for top commit: amitiuttarwar: reACK 5730a43703f7e5a5ca26245ba3b55fbdd027d0b6 naumenkogs: ACK 5730a43703f7e5a5ca26245ba3b55fbdd027d0b6 jnewbery: ACK 5730a43703 Tree-SHA512: 8a81234f37e827705138eb254223f7f3b3bf44a06cb02126fc7990b0d231b9bd8f07d38d185cc30d55bf35548a6fdc286b69602498d875b937e7c58332158bf9
2021-07-20Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22502: scripted-diff: Revert "fuzz: Add Temporary ↵fanquake
debug assert for oss-fuzz issue" facd56750c8a6aee88eeef75d8c8233778d35757 scripted-diff: Revert "fuzz: Add Temporary debug assert for oss-fuzz issue" (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: No longer needed, as it wouldn't help to debug this issue. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22472#issuecomment-882692900 ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK facd56750c8a6aee88eeef75d8c8233778d35757 Tree-SHA512: 13352b3529c43d6e65ab127134b32158d3072dc2fbbb326fea9adfeada5a8610d0477ea75748b8b68e7abb3b9869a989df3a3169e92bdd458053d64bae6ed379
2021-07-20Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22497: scripted-diff: remove ResetI2PPorts() (revert ↵fanquake
e0a2b390c14) d4b67c8ebc2bb7488bcaaccc3a801cdef1cf1678 scripted-diff: remove ResetI2PPorts() (revert e0a2b390c14) (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: `CAddrMan::ResetI2PPorts()` was temporary. Remove it: * it has partially achieved its goal: probably ran on about half of the I2P nodes * it is hackish, deemed risky and two bugs where found in it: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22467 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22470 -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- git show e0a2b390c144e123e2fc8a289fdff36815476964 |git apply -R -END VERIFY SCRIPT- Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22467 Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22470 ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK d4b67c8ebc2bb7488bcaaccc3a801cdef1cf1678 MarcoFalke: review ACK d4b67c8ebc2bb7488bcaaccc3a801cdef1cf1678 😲 jonatack: ACK d4b67c8ebc2bb7488bcaaccc3a801cdef1cf1678 per IRC discussions https://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2021-07-16.html#l-212 and https://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2021-07-19.html#l-210 Tree-SHA512: 60d8f0ea0f66a8fcedfcb9c8944a419b974b15509b54ddfeec58db49ae9418e6916df712bba3fbd6b29497d85f7951fb9aa2e48eb9c59f88d09435685bd00b4c
2021-07-19scripted-diff: Revert "fuzz: Add Temporary debug assert for oss-fuzz issue"MarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- git show faf1af58f85da74f94c6b5f6910c7faf7b47cc88 | git apply --reverse -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2021-07-19Reorder dumpwallet so that cs_main functions go firstAndrew Chow
DEBUG_LOCKORDER expects cs_wallet, cs_main, and cs_KeyStore to be acquired in that order. However dumpwallet would take these in the order cs_wallet, cs_KeyStore, cs_main. So when configured with `--enable-debug`, it is possible to hit the lock order assertion when using dumpwallet. To fix this, cs_wallet and cs_KeyStore are no longer locked at the same time. Instead cs_wallet will be locked first. Then the functions which lock cs_main will be run. Lastly cs_KeyStore will be locked afterwards. This avoids the lock order issue. Furthermore, since GetKeyBirthTimes (only used by dumpwallet) also uses a function that locks cs_main, and itself also locks cs_KeyStore, the same reordering is done here.
2021-07-19Update assumed chain paramsSriram
Note: 10% overhead to the base value of `mainnet` in `m_assumed_blockchain_size`
2021-07-19scripted-diff: remove ResetI2PPorts() (revert e0a2b390c14)Vasil Dimov
`CAddrMan::ResetI2PPorts()` was temporary. Remove it: * it has partially achieved its goal: probably ran on about half of the I2P nodes * it is hackish, deemed risky and two bugs where found in it https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22467 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22470 -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- git show e0a2b390c144e123e2fc8a289fdff36815476964 |git apply -R -END VERIFY SCRIPT- Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22467 Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22470
2021-07-19Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22455: addrman: detect on-disk corrupted nNew and ↵MarcoFalke
nTried during unserialization 816f29eab296ebec2da8f8606ad618609e3ba228 addrman: detect on-disk corrupted nNew and nTried during unserialization (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: Negative `nNew` or `nTried` are not possible during normal operation. So, if we read such values during unserialize, report addrman corruption. Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22450 ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: cr ACK 816f29eab296ebec2da8f8606ad618609e3ba228 jonatack: ACK 816f29eab296ebec2da8f8606ad618609e3ba228 lsilva01: Code Review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22455/commits/816f29eab296ebec2da8f8606ad618609e3ba228. This change provides a more accurate description of the error. Tree-SHA512: 01bdd72d2d86a0ef770a319fee995fd1e147b24a8db84ddb8cd121688e7f94fed73fddc0084758e7183c4f8d08e971f0b1b224f5adb10928a5aa4dbbc8709d74
2021-07-19Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22387: Rate limit the processing of rumoured addressesW. J. van der Laan
a4bcd687c934d47aa3922334e97e579caf5f8124 Improve tests using statistics (John Newbery) f424d601e1b6870e20bc60f5ccba36d2e210377b Add logging and addr rate limiting statistics (Pieter Wuille) b4ece8a1cda69cc268d39d21bba59c51fa2fb9ed Functional tests for addr rate limiting (Pieter Wuille) 5648138f5949013331c017c740646e2f4013bc24 Randomize the order of addr processing (Pieter Wuille) 0d64b8f709b4655d8702f810d4876cd8d96ded82 Rate limit the processing of incoming addr messages (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: The rate at which IP addresses are rumoured (through ADDR and ADDRV2 messages) on the network seems to vary from 0 for some non-participating nodes, to 0.005-0.025 addr/s for recent Bitcoin Core nodes. However, the current codebase will happily accept and process an effectively unbounded rate from attackers. There are measures to limit the influence attackers can have on the addrman database (bucket restrictions based on source IPs), but still - there is no need to permit them to feed us addresses at a rate that's orders of magnitude larger than what is common on the network today, especially as it will cause us to spam our peers too. This PR implements a [token bucket](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Token_bucket) based rate limiter, allowing an average of 0.1 addr/s per connection, with bursts up to 1000 addresses at once. Whitelisted peers as well as responses to GETADDR requests are exempt from the limit. New connections start with 1 token, so as to not interfere with the common practice of peers' self-announcement. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK a4bcd687c934d47aa3922334e97e579caf5f8124 vasild: ACK a4bcd687c934d47aa3922334e97e579caf5f8124 jnewbery: ACK a4bcd687c934d47aa3922334e97e579caf5f8124 jonatack: ACK a4bcd687c934d47aa3922334e97e579caf5f8124 Tree-SHA512: b757de76ad78a53035b622944c4213b29b3b55d3d98bf23585afa84bfba10808299d858649f92269a16abfa75eb4366ea047eae3216f7e2f6d3c455782a16bea
2021-07-18Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22421: Make IsSegWitOutput return true for taproot outputsSamuel Dobson
8465978f235e2e43feb5dabe2a4d61026343b6ab Make IsSegWitOutput return true for taproot outputs (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: This fixes a bug: currently `utxoupdatepsbt` will not fill in UTXO data for PSBTs spending taproot outputs. ACKs for top commit: achow101: Code Review ACK 8465978f235e2e43feb5dabe2a4d61026343b6ab jonatack: ACK 8465978f235e2e43feb5dabe2a4d61026343b6ab meshcollider: utACK 8465978f235e2e43feb5dabe2a4d61026343b6ab Tree-SHA512: 2f8f873450bef4b5a4ce5962a231297b386c6b1445e69ce5f36ab28eca7343be3a11bc09c38534b0f75e6f99ba15d78d3ba5d484f6c63e5a9775e1f3f55a74e0
2021-07-18Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22445: fuzz: Move implementations of non-template fuzz ↵MarcoFalke
helpers from util.h to util.cpp a2aca207b1ad00ec05d7533dbd75bbff830e1d75 Move implementations of non-template fuzz helpers (Sriram) Pull request description: There are 78 cpp files that include `util.h` (`grep -iIr "#include <test/fuzz/util.h>" src/test/fuzz | wc -l`). Modifying the implementation of a fuzz helper in `src/test/fuzz/util.h` will cause all fuzz tests to be recompiled. Keeping the declarations of these non-template fuzz helpers in `util.h` and moving their implementations to `util.cpp` will skip the redundant recompilation of all the fuzz tests, and builds these helpers only once in `util.cpp`. Functions moved from `util.h` to `util.cpp`: - `ConsumeTxMemPoolEntry` - `ContainsSpentInput` - `ConsumeNetAddr` - Methods of `FuzzedFileProvider::(open, read, write, seek, close)` ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK a2aca207b1ad00ec05d7533dbd75bbff830e1d75 🍂 Tree-SHA512: e7037ebb86d0fc56048e4f3d8733eefc21da11683b09d2b22926bda410719628d89c52ddd9b4c18aa243607a66fdb4d13a63e62ca010e66b3ec9174fd18107f0
2021-07-18Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22461: wallet: Change ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade default ↵Samuel Dobson
to True 5012a7912ee9fa35bc417cb073eebffd85f36c6c Test that descriptor wallet upgrade does nothing (Andrew Chow) 48bd7d3b7737656052d2c745ed40c7f6670842cf Change ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade to default to return true (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: When adding a new ScriptPubKeyMan, it's likely that there will be nothing for `Upgrade` to do. If it is called (via `upgradewallet`), then it should do nothing, successfully. This PR changes the default `ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade` function so that it returns a success instead of failure when doing nothing. Fixes #22460 ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK 5012a7912ee9fa35bc417cb073eebffd85f36c6c meshcollider: utACK 5012a7912ee9fa35bc417cb073eebffd85f36c6c Tree-SHA512: 578c6521e997f7bb5cc44be2cfe9e0a760b6bd4aa301026a6b8b3282e8757473e4cb9f68b2e79dacdc2b42dddae718450072e0a38817df205dfea177a74d7f3d
2021-07-18Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22234: build: Mark print-% target as phony.fanquake
fb7be92b094477131140b58a4e3ae98366b93e76 Mark print-% target as phony. (Dmitry Goncharov) Pull request description: .PHONY does not take patterns (such as print-%) as prerequisites. Have print-% depend on force and mark force as phony. This change ensures print-% rule works even when there is a file that matches the target. ``` $ # on master $ make print-host host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu $ touch print-host $ make print-host make: 'print-host' is up to date. $ $ git co mark_print_as_phony Switched to branch 'mark_print_as_phony' $ make print-host host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu $ touch force $ make print-host host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ``` ACKs for top commit: hebasto: ACK fb7be92b094477131140b58a4e3ae98366b93e76, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (x86_64). Tree-SHA512: b89ae66aa8c7aa6a7ab5f0956f9eb3b3ef9d56994b60dc2a97d498d4c1bba537845c190723e8a10310280b1b35df2cd935cc30aeb76735cac2dc621ad7823772
2021-07-18Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21430: build: Add -Werror=implicit-fallthrough compile ↵fanquake
flag 3c4c8e79baf02af97ba1502189f649b04ef2198d build: Add -Werror=implicit-fallthrough compile flag (Hennadii Stepanov) 014110c47d94ece6e3e655cdbf02ed8c91c7a5cf Use C++17 [[fallthrough]] attribute, and drop -Wno-implicit-fallthrough (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 3c4c8e79baf02af97ba1502189f649b04ef2198d - looks ok to me now. Checked that warnings occur in our code & leveldb by removing a `[[fallthrough]]` or `FALLTHROUGH_INTENDED`. jarolrod: ACK 3c4c8e79baf02af97ba1502189f649b04ef2198d theStack: ACK 3c4c8e79baf02af97ba1502189f649b04ef2198d Tree-SHA512: 4dce91f0f26b8a3de09bd92bb3d7e1995e078e3a8b3ff861c4fbf6c0b32b2327d063633b07b89c4aa94a1141d7f78d46d9d43ab8df865273e342693ad30645b6
2021-07-15Make IsSegWitOutput return true for taproot outputsPieter Wuille
2021-07-15bench: fix 32-bit narrowing warning in bench/peer_eviction.cppJon Atack
2021-07-15Add logging and addr rate limiting statisticsPieter Wuille
Includes logging improvements by Vasil Dimov and John Newbery.
2021-07-15Randomize the order of addr processingPieter Wuille
2021-07-15Rate limit the processing of incoming addr messagesPieter Wuille
While limitations on the influence of attackers on addrman already exist (affected buckets are restricted to a subset based on incoming IP / network group), there is no reason to permit them to let them feed us addresses at more than a multiple of the normal network rate. This commit introduces a "token bucket" rate limiter for the processing of addresses in incoming ADDR and ADDRV2 messages. Every connection gets an associated token bucket. Processing an address in an ADDR or ADDRV2 message from non-whitelisted peers consumes a token from the bucket. If the bucket is empty, the address is ignored (it is not forwarded or processed). The token counter increases at a rate of 0.1 tokens per second, and will accrue up to a maximum of 1000 tokens (the maximum we accept in a single ADDR or ADDRV2). When a GETADDR is sent to a peer, it immediately gets 1000 additional tokens, as we actively desire many addresses from such peers (this may temporarily cause the token count to exceed 1000). The rate limit of 0.1 addr/s was chosen based on observation of honest nodes on the network. Activity in general from most nodes is either 0, or up to a maximum around 0.025 addr/s for recent Bitcoin Core nodes. A few (self-identified, through subver) crawler nodes occasionally exceed 0.1 addr/s.
2021-07-15Change ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade to default to return trueAndrew Chow
If a ScriptPubKeyMan does not implement Upgrade, then using upgraewallet will fail unexpectedly. By changing the default to return true, then this error can be avoided. This is still correct because a successful upgrade can be that nothing happened.
2021-07-15Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22211: net: relay I2P addresses even if not reachable ↵W. J. van der Laan
(by us) 7593b06bd1262f438bf34769ecc00e9c22328e56 test: ensure I2P addresses are relayed (Vasil Dimov) e7468139a1dddd4946bc70697ec38816b3fa8f9b test: make CAddress in functional tests comparable (Vasil Dimov) 33e211d2a442e4555ff3401f92af4ee2f7552568 test: implement ser/unser of I2P addresses in functional tests (Vasil Dimov) 86742811ce3662789ac85334008090a3b54babe3 test: use NODE_* constants instead of magic numbers (Vasil Dimov) ba45f0270815d54ae3290efc16324c2ff1984565 net: relay I2P addresses even if not reachable (by us) (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: Nodes that can reach the I2P network (have set `-i2psam=`) will relay I2P addresses even without this patch. However, nodes that can't reach the I2P network will not. This was done as a precaution in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20119 before anybody could connect to I2P because then, for sure, it would have been useless. Now, however, we have I2P support and a bunch of I2P nodes, so get all nodes on the network to relay I2P addresses to help with propagation, similarly to what we do with Tor addresses. ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK 7593b06bd1262f438bf34769ecc00e9c22328e56 naumenkogs: ACK 7593b06bd1262f438bf34769ecc00e9c22328e56. laanwj: Code review ACK 7593b06bd1262f438bf34769ecc00e9c22328e56 kristapsk: ACK 7593b06bd1262f438bf34769ecc00e9c22328e56. Code looks correct, tested that functional test suite passes and also that `test/functional/p2p_addrv2_replay.py` fails if I undo changes in `IsRelayable()`. Tree-SHA512: c9feec4a9546cc06bc2fec6d74f999a3c0abd3d15b7c421c21fcf2d610eb94611489e33d61bdcd5a4f42041a6d84aa892f7ae293b0d4f755309a8560b113b735
2021-07-15Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22284: p2p, refactor: performance improvements to ↵W. J. van der Laan
ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio() b1d905c225e87a4a289c0cd3593c6c21cea3fba7 p2p: earlier continuation when no remaining eviction candidates (Vasil Dimov) c9e8d8f9b168dec2bc7b845da38449e96708cf8e p2p: process more candidates per protection iteration (Jon Atack) 02e411ec456af80d1da76085a814c68bb3aca6de p2p: iterate eviction protection only on networks having candidates (Jon Atack) 5adb06457403f8c1d874e9c6748ecbb78ef8fa2b bench: add peer eviction protection benchmarks (Jon Atack) 566357f8f7471f74729297868917aa32f6d3c390 refactor: move GetRandomNodeEvictionCandidates() to test utilities (Jon Atack) Pull request description: This follow-up to #21261 improves `ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio()` for better performance. Benchmarks are added; the performance improvement is between 2x and 5x for the benchmarked cases (CPU 2.50GHz, Turbo off, performance mode, Debian Clang 11 non-debug build). ``` $ ./src/bench/bench_bitcoin -filter="EvictionProtection*.*" ``` The refactored code is well-covered by existing unit tests and also a fuzzer. - `$ ./src/test/test_bitcoin -t net_peer_eviction_tests` - `$ FUZZ=node_eviction ./src/test/fuzz/fuzz ../qa-assets/fuzz_seed_corpus/node_eviction` ACKs for top commit: klementtan: Tested and code review ACK b1d905c2. vasild: ACK b1d905c225e87a4a289c0cd3593c6c21cea3fba7 jarolrod: ACK b1d905c225e87a4a289c0cd3593c6c21cea3fba7 Tree-SHA512: a3a6607b9ea2fec138da9780c03f63e177b6712091c5a3ddc3804b896a7585216446310280791f5e20cc023d02d2f03a4139237e12b5c1d7f2a1fa1011610e96
2021-07-15addrman: detect on-disk corrupted nNew and nTried during unserializationVasil Dimov
Negative `nNew` or `nTried` are not possible during normal operation. So, if we read such values during unserialize, report addrman corruption. Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22450
2021-07-15Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22415: Make m_mempool optional in CChainStateMarcoFalke
ceb7b35a39145717e2d9d356fd382bd1f95d2a5a refactor: move UpdateTip into CChainState (James O'Beirne) 4abf0779d6594e97222279110c328b75b5f3db7b refactor: no mempool arg to GetCoinsCacheSizeState (James O'Beirne) 46e3efd1e4ae2f058ecfffdaee7e882c4305eb35 refactor: move UpdateMempoolForReorg into CChainState (James O'Beirne) 617661703ac29e0744f21de74501d033fdc53ff6 validation: make CChainState::m_mempool optional (James O'Beirne) Pull request description: Make `CChainState::m_mempool` optional by making it a pointer instead of a reference. This will allow a simplification to assumeutxo semantics (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606#pullrequestreview-692965905) and help facilitate the `-nomempool` option. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: ACK ceb7b35a39145717e2d9d356fd382bd1f95d2a5a naumenkogs: ACK ceb7b35a39145717e2d9d356fd382bd1f95d2a5a ryanofsky: Code review ACK ceb7b35a39145717e2d9d356fd382bd1f95d2a5a (just minor style and test tweaks since last review) lsilva01: Code review ACK and tested on Signet ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22415/commits/ceb7b35a39145717e2d9d356fd382bd1f95d2a5a MarcoFalke: review ACK ceb7b35a39145717e2d9d356fd382bd1f95d2a5a 😌 Tree-SHA512: cc445ad33439d5918cacf80a6354eea8f3d33bb7719573ed5b970fad1a0dab410bcd70be44c862b8aba1b71263b82d79876688c553e339362653dfb3d8ec81e6
2021-07-15Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22385: refactor: Use DeploymentEnabled to hide VB ↵MarcoFalke
deployments fa5658ed077bfb02b6281d642dc649abdb99b6ee Use DeploymentEnabled to hide VB deployments (MarcoFalke) fa11fecf0dac44846a08e1b325547641f2eca957 doc: Move buried deployment doc to the enum that enumerates them (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Plus a doc commit. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK fa5658ed077bfb02b6281d642dc649abdb99b6ee ajtowns: utACK fa5658ed077bfb02b6281d642dc649abdb99b6ee Tree-SHA512: 2aeceee0674feb603d76656eff40695b7d7305de309f837bbb6a8c1dbb1d0b962b741f06ab7b9a8b1dbd1964c9c0c9aa5dc9588fd8e6d896e620b69e08eedbaa
2021-07-14Move implementations of non-template fuzz helpersSriram
Moved implementations of `ConsumeTxMemPoolEntry`, `ContainsSpentInput`, `ConsumeNetAddr`, and the methods(open, read, write, seek, close) of FuzzedFileProvider from test/fuzz/util.h to test/fuzz/util.cpp.
2021-07-13refactor: move UpdateTip into CChainStateJames O'Beirne
Makes sense and saves on arguments. Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
2021-07-13refactor: no mempool arg to GetCoinsCacheSizeStateJames O'Beirne
Unnecessary argument since we can make use of this->m_mempool Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
2021-07-13refactor: move UpdateMempoolForReorg into CChainStateJames O'Beirne
Allows fewer arguments and simplification of call sites. Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
2021-07-13validation: make CChainState::m_mempool optionalJames O'Beirne
Since we now have multiple chainstate objects, only one of them is active at any given time. An active chainstate has a mempool, but there's no point to others having one. This change will simplify proposed assumeutxo semantics. See the discussion here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606#pullrequestreview-692965905 Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
2021-07-13Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22112: Force port 0 in I2PW. J. van der Laan
4101ec9d2e05a35c35f587a28f1feee6cebcc61b doc: mention that we enforce port=0 in I2P (Vasil Dimov) e0a2b390c144e123e2fc8a289fdff36815476964 addrman: reset I2P ports to 0 when loading from disk (Vasil Dimov) 41cda9d075ebcab1dbb950160ebe9d0ba7b5745e test: ensure I2P ports are handled as expected (Vasil Dimov) 4f432bd738c420512a86a51ab3e00323f396b89e net: do not connect to I2P hosts on port!=0 (Vasil Dimov) 1f096f091ebd88efb18154b8894a38122c39624f net: distinguish default port per network (Vasil Dimov) aeac3bce3ead1f24ca782079ef0defa86fd8cb98 net: change I2P seeds' ports to 0 (Vasil Dimov) 38f900290cc3a839e99bef13474d35e1c02e6b0d net: change assumed I2P port to 0 (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: _This is an alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514, inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-815049933. They are mutually exclusive. Just one of them should be merged._ Change assumed ports for I2P to 0 (instead of the default 8333) as this is closer to what actually happens underneath with SAM 3.1 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-812632520, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-816564719). Don't connect to I2P peers with advertised port != 0 (we don't specify a port to our SAM 3.1 proxy and it always connects to port = 0). Note, this change: * Keeps I2P addresses with port != 0 in addrman and relays them to others via P2P gossip. There may be non-bitcoin-core-22.0 peers using SAM 3.2 and for them such addresses may be useful. * Silently refuses to connect to I2P hosts with port != 0. This is ok for automatically chosen peers from addrman. Not so ok for peers provided via `-addnode` or `-connect` - a user who specifies `foo.b32.i2p:1234` (non zero port) may wonder why "nothing is happening". Fixes #21389 ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK 4101ec9d2e05a35c35f587a28f1feee6cebcc61b jonatack: re-ACK 4101ec9d2e05a35c35f587a28f1feee6cebcc61b per `git range-diff efff9c3 0b0ee03 4101ec9`, built with DDEBUG_ADDRMAN, did fairly extensive testing on mainnet both with and without a peers.dat / -dnsseeds=0 to test boostrapping. Tree-SHA512: 0e3c019e1dc05e54f559275859d3450e0c735596d179e30b66811aad9d5b5fabe3dcc44571e8f7b99f9fe16453eee393d6e153454dd873b9ff14907d4e6354fe
2021-07-12init: remove straggling boost thread_group codefanquake
boost::thread_group usage was removed in #21016.
2021-07-12Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22432: doc: fix incorrect testmempoolaccept docfanquake
9169be09f49c82fece034285e92f8ffa41e19ee2 fix incorrect testmempoolaccept doc (glozow) Pull request description: Sorry, I somehow missed this... ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: Tested ACK 9169be09f49c82fece034285e92f8ffa41e19ee2 Tree-SHA512: d44f81655669e338af298b7b5d616eb4ca15cbaac667c49251408cb92cee2fb9f440fcfbbac6a17744f24ceeafaf6cea6b9c49a37a464f7eaeeda6e655a56f7a
2021-07-12fix incorrect testmempoolaccept docglozow
2021-07-12Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#20234: net: don't bind on 0.0.0.0 if binds are ↵W. J. van der Laan
restricted to Tor 2feec3ce3130961f98ceb030951d0e46d3b9096c net: don't bind on 0.0.0.0 if binds are restricted to Tor (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: The semantic of `-bind` is to restrict the binding only to some address. If not specified, then the user does not care and we bind to `0.0.0.0`. If specified then we should honor the restriction and bind only to the specified address. Before this change, if no `-bind` is given then we would bind to `0.0.0.0:8333` and to `127.0.0.1:8334` (incoming Tor) which is ok - the user does not care to restrict the binding. However, if only `-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary `-bind=`) then we would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `0.0.0.0:8333` in addition. Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only `-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary `-bind=`) then bind to `addr:port` (only) and consider incoming connections to that as Tor and do not advertise it. I.e. a Tor-only node. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK 2feec3ce3130961f98ceb030951d0e46d3b9096c jonatack: utACK 2feec3ce3130961f98ceb030951d0e46d3b9096c per `git diff a004833 2feec3c` hebasto: ACK 2feec3ce3130961f98ceb030951d0e46d3b9096c, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64): Tree-SHA512: a04483af601706da928958b92dc560f9cfcc78ab0bb9d74414636eed1c6f29ed538ce1fb5a17d41ed82c9c9a45ca94899d0966e7ef93da809c9bcdcdb1d1f040
2021-07-12net, rpc: Enable AddrFetch connections for functional testingMartin Zumsande
Co-authored-by: Amiti Uttarwar <amiti@uttarwar.org>
2021-07-09[style] Clean up BroadcastTransaction()John Newbery
2021-07-09[mempool] Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactionsJohn Newbery
This commit fixes some slightly unexpected behaviour when: - there is already transaction in the mempool (the "mempool tx") - BroadcastTransaction() is called for a transaction with the same txid as the mempool transaction but a different witness (the "new tx") Prior to this commit, if BroadcastTransaction() is called with relay=true, then it'll call RelayTransaction() using the txid/wtxid of the new tx, not the txid/wtxid of the mempool tx. For wtxid relay peers, in SendMessages(), the wtxid of the new tx will be taken from setInventoryTxToSend, but will then be filtered out from the vector of wtxids to announce, since m_mempool.info() won't find the transaction (the mempool contains the mempool tx, which has a different wtxid from the new tx). Fix this by calling RelayTransaction() with the wtxid of the mempool transaction in this case.
2021-07-09[mempool] Only add a transaction to the unbroadcast set when it's added to ↵John Newbery
the mempool Currently, if BroadcastTransaction() is called to rebroadcast a transaction (e.g. by ResendWalletTransactions()), then we add the transaction to the unbroadcast set. That transaction has already been broadcast in the past, so peers are unlikely to request it again, meaning RemoveUnbroadcastTx() won't be called and it won't be removed from m_unbroadcast_txids. Net processing will therefore continue to attempt rebroadcast for the transaction every 10-15 minutes. This will most likely continue until the node connects to a new peer which hasn't yet seen the transaction (or perhaps indefinitely). Fix by only adding the transaction to the broadcast set when it's added to the mempool.
2021-07-09Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22253: validation: distinguish between same tx and ↵W. J. van der Laan
same-nonwitness-data tx in mempool b7a8cd9963e810264d3b45d0ad15af863965c47a [test] submit same txid different wtxid as mempool tx (glozow) fdb48163bfbf34f79dc78ffaa2bbf9e39af96687 [validation] distinguish same txid different wtxid in mempool (glozow) Pull request description: On master, if you submit a transaction with the same txid but different witness to the mempool, it thinks the transactions are the same. Users submitting through `BroadcastTransaction()` (i.e. `sendrawtransaction` or the wallet) don't get notified that there's a different transaction in the mempool, although it doesn't crash. Users submitting through `testmempoolaccept()` will get a "txn-already-in-mempool" error. This PR simply distinguishes between `txn-already-in-mempool` and `txn-same-nonwitness-data-in-mempool`, without handling them differently: `sendrawtransaction` still will not throw, but `testmempoolaccept` will give you a different error. I believe the intention of #19645 is to allow full swaps of transactions that have different witnesses but identical nonwitness data. Returning a different error message + adding a test was suggested: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19645#issuecomment-705109193 so this is that PR. ACKs for top commit: naumenkogs: ACK b7a8cd9963e810264d3b45d0ad15af863965c47a jnewbery: Code review ACK b7a8cd9963e810264d3b45d0ad15af863965c47a theStack: Code-review ACK b7a8cd9963e810264d3b45d0ad15af863965c47a darosior: re-utACK b7a8cd9963e810264d3b45d0ad15af863965c47a Tree-SHA512: 9c6591edaf8727ba5b4675977adb8cbdef7288584003b6cd659828032dc92d2ae915800a8ef8b6fdffe112c1b660df72297a3dcf2e2e3e1f959c6cb3678c63ee
2021-07-09addrman: reset I2P ports to 0 when loading from diskVasil Dimov
This is a temporary change to convert I2P addresses that have propagated with port 8333 to ones with port 0. It would cause a problem some day if indeed some bitcoin software is listening on port 8333 only and rejects connections to port 0 and we are still using SAM 3.1 which only supports port 0. In this case we would replace 8333 with 0 and try to connect to such nodes. This commit should be included in 22.0 and be reverted before 23.0 is released.
2021-07-09net: do not connect to I2P hosts on port!=0Vasil Dimov
When connecting to an I2P host we don't specify destination port and it is being forced to 0 by the SAM 3.1 proxy, so if we connect to the same host on two different ports, that would be actually two connections to the same service (listening on port 0). Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21389
2021-07-09net: distinguish default port per networkVasil Dimov
Change `CChainParams::GetDefaultPort()` to return 0 if the network is I2P.
2021-07-09net: change I2P seeds' ports to 0Vasil Dimov
2021-07-09net: change assumed I2P port to 0Vasil Dimov
* When accepting an I2P connection, assume the peer has port 0 instead of the default 8333 (for mainnet). It is not being sent to us, so we must assume something. * When deriving our own I2P listen CService use port 0 instead of the default 8333 (for mainnet). So that we later advertise it to peers with port 0. In the I2P protocol SAM 3.1 and older (we use 3.1) ports are not used, so they are irrelevant. However in SAM 3.2 and newer ports are used and from the point of view of SAM 3.2, a peer using SAM 3.1 seems to have specified port=0.
2021-07-09Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22176: test: Correct outstanding -Werror=sign-compare ↵fanquake
errors 4e44f5bac4481d49ac53c458dcc5ca48e8b28414 test: Correct outstanding -Werror=sign-compare errors (Ben Woosley) Pull request description: I'm unclear on why these aren't failing on CI, but they failed for me locally, e.g.: ``` In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/test/test_tools.hpp:46: /usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:107:17: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'const unsigned int' and 'const int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare] return left == right; ~~~~ ^ ~~~~~ /usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:130:16: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl<unsigned int, int>' requested here return equal_impl( left, right ); ^ /usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:145:16: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl_frwd::call_impl<unsigned int, int>' requested here return call_impl( left, right, left_is_array() ); ^ /usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:92:50: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl_frwd::operator()<unsigned int, int>' requested here BOOST_PP_REPEAT( BOOST_TEST_MAX_PREDICATE_ARITY, IMPL_FRWD, _ ) ^ /usr/local/include/boost/preprocessor/repetition/repeat.hpp:30:26: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_REPEAT' ^ /usr/local/include/boost/preprocessor/cat.hpp:22:32: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_CAT' ^ /usr/local/include/boost/preprocessor/cat.hpp:29:34: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_CAT_I' ^ <scratch space>:153:1: note: expanded from here BOOST_PP_REPEAT_1 ^ test/streams_tests.cpp:122:5: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::check_frwd<boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl_frwd, unsigned int, int>' requested here BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(varint, 54321); ^ /usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:107:17: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'const unsigned long long' and 'const long' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare] return left == right; ~~~~ ^ ~~~~~ /usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:130:16: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl<unsigned long long, long>' requested here return equal_impl( left, right ); ^ /usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:145:16: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl_frwd::call_impl<unsigned long long, long>' requested here return call_impl( left, right, left_is_array() ); ^ /usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:92:50: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl_frwd::operator()<unsigned long long, long>' requested here BOOST_PP_REPEAT( BOOST_TEST_MAX_PREDICATE_ARITY, IMPL_FRWD, _ ) ^ /usr/local/include/boost/preprocessor/repetition/repeat.hpp:30:26: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_REPEAT' ^ /usr/local/include/boost/preprocessor/cat.hpp:22:32: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_CAT' ^ /usr/local/include/boost/preprocessor/cat.hpp:29:34: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_CAT_I' ^ <scratch space>:161:1: note: expanded from here BOOST_PP_REPEAT_1 ^ test/serfloat_tests.cpp:41:5: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::check_frwd<boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl_frwd, unsigned long long, long>' requested here BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(TestDouble(std::numeric_limits<double>::infinity()), 0x7ff0000000000000); ^ ACKs for top commit: theStack: ACK 4e44f5bac4481d49ac53c458dcc5ca48e8b28414 Tree-SHA512: 8d9e5245676c61207ceacdf78c78a78ccc9fd2a2551d4d8df023513795591334aa2f5e1f4a2a8ed2bfeb381f1e226b6ba84c07e0de29a1f3f00da71f3a257bc1
2021-07-09Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22381: guix: Test security-check sanity before ↵fanquake
performing them (with macOS) 5b4703c6a70db2fa72fcace56a15db07d4b0acf1 guix: Test security-check sanity before performing them (Carl Dong) 6cf3345297d371b4785d80d54e802b52ff09e8c2 scripts: adjust test-symbol-check for guix release environment (fanquake) 1946b5f77cb5a6bb37500252079c3582cac4a6c9 scripts: more robustly test macOS symbol checks (fanquake) a8127b34bce3597b8091e14057c926197966a234 build: Use and test PE binutils with --reloc-section (Carl Dong) 678348db515c770c4dddfac512cdd97be11d407d guix: Patch binutils to add security-related disable flags (Carl Dong) 9fdc8afe117b7b1ea845f8acae9e831922b8f92b devtools: Improve *-check.py tool detection (Carl Dong) bda62eab38c5dd74e222eddedbca19ace9df6daa ci: skip running the Linux test-security-check target for now (fanquake) d6ef3543ae16847d5a91fa9271acee9bd2164b32 lint: Run mypy with --show-error-codes (Carl Dong) Pull request description: This is #20980 rebased (to include the Boost Process fix), and with an additional commit (892d6897f1e613084aa0517a660eab2412308e6e) to fix running the `test-security-check` target for the macOS build. It should pass inside Guix, as well as when cross-compiling on Ubuntu, or building natively on macOS. Note that the `test-security-check` may output some warnings (similar too): ```bash ld: warning: passed two min versions (10.14, 11.4) for platform macOS. Using 11.4. ld: warning: passed two min versions (10.14, 11.4) for platform macOS. Using 11.4. ld: warning: passed two min versions (10.14, 10.14) for platform macOS. Using 10.14. ``` but those can be ignored, and come about due to us passing `-platform_version` when `-mmacosx-version-min` is already part of `CC`. Guix builds: ```bash 71ed0c7a13a4726300779ffc87f7d271086a2744c36896fe6dc51fe3dc33df2e guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part 9273980a17052c8ec45b77579781c14ab5d189fa25aa29907d5115513dd302b1 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-aarch64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 9c042179af43c8896eb95a34294df15d4910308dcdba40b2010cd36e192938b8 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz 1ceddecac113f50a952ba6a201cdcdb722e3dc804e663f219bfac8268ce42bf0 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/SHA256SUMS.part 759597c4e925e75db4a2381c06cda9b9f4e4674c23436148676b31c9be05c7aa guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz 34e3b6beabaf8c95d7c2ca0d2c3ac4411766694ef43e00bd9783badbbaf045a7 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/dist-archive/SKIPATTEST.TAG 3664f6ceee7898caa374281fd877a7597fe491fa2e9f0c174c28d889d60b559c guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/dist-archive/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d.tar.gz d6bc35ba0750c1440bb32831b8c12cddee62f6dce10fec2650897444c2bf4748 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part a836edf6474ba0c16c19bb217549bac7936c1b44306ed512df58f607ee5568f2 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-powerpc64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 7cc91c6805d5069ca3bd1771e77d95f83eb184b137198cbf84d1d11d0a5c5afe guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-powerpc64-linux-gnu.tar.gz 93b4cb7b83c4975120ad5de5a92f050f5760a2a3f2c37c204c647f5a581c924a guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part 2266e2c5d0dafa28c6c057ccfc1c439baeab1d714d8c3f64a83015d2827116d2 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-powerpc64le-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 85f41f42c319b83d049d6fd2e2278c07b40a1e28a2eac596427822c0eef9dc3f guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-powerpc64le-linux-gnu.tar.gz 1499ca9119926083d8c3714ca10d8d4c8d864cbeee8848fd8445b7a1d081222d guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part 1995fc1a2e45c49d4b0718aff5dcdac931917e8ae9e762fd23f1126abcecc248 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 266889eb58429a470f0fd7bb123f2ae09b0aef86c47b0390938b3634a8f748a9 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz cdc3a0dcf80b110443dac5ddf8bc951001a776a651c898c5ea49bb2d487bfe29 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-apple-darwin18/SHA256SUMS.part 8538d1eab96c97866b24546c453d95822f24cf9c6638b42ba523eb7aa441cb26 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-apple-darwin18/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-osx-unsigned.dmg d1b73133f1da68586b07292a8425f7f851e93f599c016376f23728c041cf39cc guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-apple-darwin18/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-osx-unsigned.tar.gz 5ad94c5f8a5f29405955ff3ab35d137de1acc04398d6c8298fb187b57a6e316a guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-apple-darwin18/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-osx64.tar.gz 8c6d7b3f847faa7b4d16ceecf228f26f146ea982615c1d7a00c57f9230a0c484 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part d0a8c99750319ad8046cfa132a54e5c13a08351f94439ae9af0f8e5486c2c2ea guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz d816bb26dd4b0e309f2f576b1cccc6d78743fb2f357daad2da09bb1177330971 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz 65caaa7f648c7eab1eb82c3331a2ca25b8cd4fe41439de55604501e02571de55 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/SHA256SUMS.part 5bf6f7328cbceb0db22a2d7babb07b60cb6dcc19a6db84a1698589b7f5173a06 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-win-unsigned.tar.gz 7aabcb56115decef78d3797840b6e49dbc9b202d56f892490e92616fb06fec9e guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-win64-debug.zip 2f369694648ff9dc5ca1261a1e5874b1c7408ccf2802f9caef56c1334e8a5b7c guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-win64-setup-unsigned.exe 1c1f92513c4aad38419ff49a7b80bf10e6b1eca01ee8c5e3b2acd1768cf1e3d5 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-win64.zip ``` ACKs for top commit: hebasto: Approach ACK 5b4703c6a70db2fa72fcace56a15db07d4b0acf1. Tree-SHA512: 2cd92a245ea64ef7176cf402a1fa5348a9421c30a4d30d01c950c48f6dcc15cf22ce69ffe1657be97e5fccc14bd933d64683c4439b695528ce3dc34d72dda927
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-11-26 10:11:31 +0000