aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-12-04MOVEONLY: Move IsBDBFile, IsSQLiteFile, and ListWalletDirRussell Yanofsky
This commit does not change to any code and behavior. It it is easily reviewed with the --color-moved=dimmed_zebra git diff option. Motivation for this change is to: - Consolidate redundant functions IsBDBFile /ExistsBerkeleyDatabase / SplitWalletPath, and IsSQLiteFile / ExistsSQLiteDatabase in the next commits - Detect SQLite wallets consistently regardless whether bitcoin is built with SQLite support in the next commits - Avoid attempting to open SQLite databases with the BDB library when bitcoin is built without SQLite support in the next commits
2020-12-04Merge #20566: refactor: Use C++17 std::array where possibleMarcoFalke
fac7ab1d5b58fb9cfd80d5cf74ac4d2e5cb8eff2 refactor: Use C++17 std::array where possible (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Using the C++11 std::array with explicit template parameters is problematic because overshooting the size will fill the memory with default constructed types. For example, ```cpp #include <array> #include <iostream> int main() { std::array<int, 3> a{1, 2}; for (const auto& i : a) { std::cout << i << std::endl; // prints "1 2 0" } } ``` ACKs for top commit: jonasschnelli: Code Review ACK fac7ab1d5b58fb9cfd80d5cf74ac4d2e5cb8eff2 practicalswift: cr ACK fac7ab1d5b58fb9cfd80d5cf74ac4d2e5cb8eff2 vasild: ACK fac7ab1d promag: Code review ACK fac7ab1d5b58fb9cfd80d5cf74ac4d2e5cb8eff2. Tree-SHA512: ef7e872340226e0d6160e6fd66c6ca78b2ef9c245fa0ab27fe4777aac9fba8d5aaa154da3d27b65dec39a6a63d07f1063c3a8ffb667a98ab137756a1a0af2656
2020-12-04Merge #20255: util: Add Assume() identity functionMarcoFalke
faa05854f832405231c9198787a4eafe2cd4c5f0 util: Remove probably misleading TODO (MarcoFalke) fac5efe730ab5b8694920547203deefc5252d294 util: Add Assume() identity function (MarcoFalke) fa861569dcfff9e72686dc5f30b1faa645b4d54e util: Allow Assert(...) to be used in all contexts (practicalswift) Pull request description: This is needed for #20138. Please refer to the added documentation for motivation. ACKs for top commit: practicalswift: cr ACK faa05854f832405231c9198787a4eafe2cd4c5f0 jnewbery: utACK faa05854f832405231c9198787a4eafe2cd4c5f0 hebasto: ACK faa05854f832405231c9198787a4eafe2cd4c5f0, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged. Tree-SHA512: 72165fbd898b92ab9a79b070993fa1faa86c2e3545b6645e72c652bda295d5107bc298d0482bf3aaf0926fc0c3e6418a445c0e073b08568c44231f547f76a688
2020-12-04refactor: Use C++17 std::array where possibleMarcoFalke
2020-12-03Merge #20221: net: compat.h related cleanupWladimir J. van der Laan
cadb77a6ab8a3e6f56062cfaec4dd8168c71b39d net: Add compat.h header for htonl function (Hennadii Stepanov) f796f0057bc7dad8e7065831b07f432fc0fb9f08 net: Drop unneeded headers when compat.h included (Hennadii Stepanov) 467c34644861a5267601255650e27c7aadab31dc net: Drop unneeded Windows headers in compat.h (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: It is the `compat.h` header's job to provide platform-agnostic interfaces for internet operations. No need in `#include <arpa/inet.h>` scattered around. ACKs for top commit: practicalswift: re-ACK cadb77a6ab8a3e6f56062cfaec4dd8168c71b39d: patch looks even better laanwj: Code review ACK cadb77a6ab8a3e6f56062cfaec4dd8168c71b39d Tree-SHA512: 625ff90b2806310ab856a6ca1ddb6d9a85aa70f342b323e8525a711dd12219a1ecec8373ec1dca5a0653ffb11f9b421753887b25615d991ba3132c1cca6a3c6e
2020-12-02Merge #20530: lint, refactor: Update cppcheck linter to c++17 and improve ↵fanquake
explicit usage 1e62350ca20898189904a88dfef9ea11ddcd8626 refactor: Improve use of explicit keyword (Fabian Jahr) c502a6dbfb854ca827a5a3925394f9e09d29b898 lint: Use c++17 std in cppcheck linter (Fabian Jahr) Pull request description: I found the `extended-lint-cppcheck` linter still uses `std=c++11` when reviewing #20471. The only difference in the output after this change is one line is missing: ``` src/script/descriptor.cpp:159:5: warning: Struct 'PubkeyProvider' has a constructor with 1 argument that is not explicit. [noExplicitConstructor] ``` After some digging, I am still not sure why this one is ignored with c++17 when 40 other`noExplicitConstructor` warnings were still appearing. In the second commit, I fix these warnings, adding `explicit` where appropriate and adding fixes to ignore otherwise. ACKs for top commit: practicalswift: cr ACK 1e62350ca20898189904a88dfef9ea11ddcd8626: patch looks correct! MarcoFalke: review ACK 1e62350ca20898189904a88dfef9ea11ddcd8626 Tree-SHA512: dff7b324429a57160e217cf38d9ddbb6e70c6cb3d3e3e0bd4013d88e07afc2292c3df94d0acf7122e9d486322821682ecf15c8f2724a78667764c05d47f89a12
2020-12-02Merge #18948: qt: Call setParent() in the parent's contextJonas Schnelli
8963b2c71f120b2746396c4987392f0105c8dd60 qt: Improve comments in WalletController::getOrCreateWallet() (Hennadii Stepanov) 5fcfee68af47d4a891ae9c9964d73886f0f01d7d qt: Call setParent() in the parent's context (Hennadii Stepanov) 5659e73493fcdfb5d0cb9d686c24c4fbe1c217ed qt: Add ObjectInvoke template function (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: The `setParent(parent)` internally calls `QCoreApplication::sendEvent(parent, QChildEvent)` that implies running in the thread which created the parent object. That is not the case always, and an internal assertion fails in the debug mode. Steps to reproduce this issue on master (007e15dcd7f8b42501e31cc36343655c53027077) on Linux Mint 20 (x86_64): ``` $ make -C depends DEBUG=1 $ CONFIG_SITE=$PWD/depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/share/config.site ./configure $ make $ QT_FATAL_WARNINGS=1 lldb src/qt/bitcoin-qt -- --regtest -debug=qt (lldb) target create "src/qt/bitcoin-qt" Current executable set to '/home/hebasto/GitHub/bitcoin/src/qt/bitcoin-qt' (x86_64). (lldb) settings set -- target.run-args "--regtest" "-debug=qt" (lldb) run Process 431562 launched: '/home/hebasto/GitHub/bitcoin/src/qt/bitcoin-qt' (x86_64) # load wallet via GUI Process 431562 stopped * thread #24, name = 'QThread', stop reason = signal SIGABRT frame #0: 0x00007ffff794518b libc.so.6`__GI_raise(sig=2) at raise.c:51:1 (lldb) bt * thread #24, name = 'QThread', stop reason = signal SIGABRT * frame #0: 0x00007ffff794518b libc.so.6`__GI_raise(sig=2) at raise.c:51:1 frame #1: 0x00007ffff7924859 libc.so.6`__GI_abort at abort.c:79:7 frame #2: 0x0000555556508ec4 bitcoin-qt`::qt_message_fatal((null)=<unavailable>, context=<unavailable>, message=<unavailable>) at qlogging.cpp:1690:15 frame #3: 0x00005555565099cf bitcoin-qt`QMessageLogger::fatal(this=<unavailable>, msg=<unavailable>) const at qlogging.cpp:796:21 frame #4: 0x000055555650479d bitcoin-qt`qt_assert_x(where=<unavailable>, what=<unavailable>, file=<unavailable>, line=<unavailable>) at qglobal.cpp:3088:46 frame #5: 0x0000555556685733 bitcoin-qt`QCoreApplicationPrivate::checkReceiverThread(receiver=0x0000555557b27510) at qcoreapplication.cpp:557:5 frame #6: 0x00005555567ced86 bitcoin-qt`QApplication::notify(this=0x00007fffffffd4a0, receiver=0x0000555557b27510, e=0x00007fff9a7f8ce0) at qapplication.cpp:2956:27 frame #7: 0x0000555556685d31 bitcoin-qt`QCoreApplication::notifyInternal2(receiver=0x0000555557b27510, event=0x00007fff9a7f8ce0) at qcoreapplication.cpp:1024:24 frame #8: 0x00005555566c9224 bitcoin-qt`QObjectPrivate::setParent_helper(QObject*) [inlined] QCoreApplication::sendEvent(event=<unavailable>, receiver=<unavailable>) at qcoreapplication.h:233:59 frame #9: 0x00005555566c9210 bitcoin-qt`QObjectPrivate::setParent_helper(this=0x00007fff85855260, o=0x0000555557b27510) at qobject.cpp:2036 frame #10: 0x00005555566c9b41 bitcoin-qt`QObject::setParent(this=<unavailable>, parent=<unavailable>) at qobject.cpp:1980:24 frame #11: 0x0000555555710be8 bitcoin-qt`WalletController::getOrCreateWallet(std::unique_ptr<interfaces::Wallet, std::default_delete<interfaces::Wallet> >) + 2534 ... ``` Fixes #18835. ACKs for top commit: ryanofsky: Code review ACK 8963b2c71f120b2746396c4987392f0105c8dd60. No changes since last review, just rebase because of conflict on some adjacent lines jonasschnelli: utACK 8963b2c71f120b2746396c4987392f0105c8dd60 Tree-SHA512: fef615904168717df3d8a0bd85eccc3eef990cc3e66c9fa280c8ef08ea009a7cb5a2a4f868ed0be3c0fe5bf683e8465850b5958deb896fdadd22d296186c9586
2020-12-02Merge #20507: sync: print proper lock order location when double lock is ↵MarcoFalke
detected db058efeb0821cb5022e3b29e0aff3627d7aaf83 sync: use HasReason() in double lock tests (Vasil Dimov) a21dc469ccf076ca3b07b1adbd8bf667145f1c44 sync: const-qualify the argument of double_lock_detected() (Vasil Dimov) 6d3689fcf6cff397187028344570489db3e6ecf4 sync: print proper lock order location when double lock is detected (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: Before: ``` Assertion failed: detected double lock at src/sync.cpp:153, details in debug log. ``` After: ``` Assertion failed: detected double lock for 'm' in src/test/sync_tests.cpp:40 (in thread ''), details in debug log. ``` ACKs for top commit: jonasschnelli: utACK db058efeb0821cb5022e3b29e0aff3627d7aaf83 ajtowns: ACK db058efeb0821cb5022e3b29e0aff3627d7aaf83 hebasto: ACK db058efeb0821cb5022e3b29e0aff3627d7aaf83, tested on Linux Mint 20 (x86_64). Tree-SHA512: 452ddb9a14e44bb174135b39f2219c76eadbb8a6c0e80d64a25f995780d6dbc7b570d9902616db94dbfabaee197b5828ba3475171a68240ac0958fb203a7acdb
2020-12-02Merge #20461: rpc: Validate -rpcauth argumentsMarcoFalke
053b4fbad8729308774d5e7b53f53c12627fa88b doc: Release note regarding -rpcauth validation (João Barbosa) 46001323b1f4a57d8d6805f1bc39a5b8d401f0c5 rpc: Validate -rpcauth arguments (João Barbosa) d37c813a43166f559a4e2d1c22e7243f70301291 rpc: Refactor to process -rpcauth once (João Barbosa) Pull request description: Invalid `-rpcauth` arguments are currently silently ignored. This make server initialization fail if any `-rpcauth` is invalid. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 053b4fbad8729308774d5e7b53f53c12627fa88b jonatack: ACK 053b4fbad8729308774d5e7b53f53c12627fa88b ryanofsky: Code review ACK 053b4fbad8729308774d5e7b53f53c12627fa88b. Only changes since last review are moving a variable declaration and adding a comment, release notes, and a `const`. Tree-SHA512: c99923d4a121f0c9f882b07f5402ea53e9b2d9455ad34468a094ffab1d64df26c82e1279734c0d42bc2e113eae7b581fbc3be52f3ed4a2d7450d11793afcf406
2020-12-02Merge #19980: refactor: Some wallet cleanupsfanquake
9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91 refactor: Assert before dereference in CWallet::GetDatabase (João Barbosa) 021feb3187b207d511561c1f0ffd7f9e5e0c9c1d refactor: Drop redudant CWallet::GetDBHandle (João Barbosa) Pull request description: ACKs for top commit: achow101: Code Review ACK 9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91 meshcollider: utACK 9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91 ryanofsky: Code review ACK 9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91. Changes since last review: rebasing due to conflict, dropping wallet path commit c6a5cd7a64c78b162f545a3467d0fea7dcaadfcc as suggested in discussion, making GetDatabase() const in the earlier commit. Giving more descriptive title like Tree-SHA512: 68cf3b5e9fe0acb3a5cd081086629989f213f1904cc344e5775767b56759a7d905b1e1c303afbe40f172ff81bf07f3719b59d8f6ec2de3fdd53cd0e2d220fb25
2020-12-01refactor: Improve use of explicit keywordFabian Jahr
2020-12-01Merge #20207: Follow-up extra comments on taproot code and testsMarcoFalke
2d8099c713dfd4b546150fd53c2e4f364b9009f4 Mention units of MAX_STANDARD_ policy constants (Pieter Wuille) 84e29c7c0141b52044020ec0c5dfa8a462b7e97f Mention in validation that IsWitnessStandard tests for P2TR (Pieter Wuille) f867cbcc268a3bfaeef5510a7e40e6d3c0818b6d Clean up assets test minimizer LDFLAGS (Pieter Wuille) ea0e78677bdbe3313f594118c500cf7784c56970 Document additional IsWitnessStandard behavior (Pieter Wuille) 6040de9a46725826330cd63cdf76e2121a18e728 Add comments on CPubKey::IsValid (Pieter Wuille) 8dbb7de67ce0a71f5fc54289c0ff048ac8dd0acc Add comments to VerifyTaprootCommitment (Pieter Wuille) cdf900cbf26db05c7edb398ea645f1d23049d810 Document need_vin_vout_mismatch argument to make_spender (Pieter Wuille) 18246ed5f09dd078fa1410b7ec2ba4379cc5e032 Fix and improve taproot_construct comments (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: Addressing some review comments raised here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953#pullrequestreview-512238027 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953#pullrequestreview-513499921 ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK 2d8099c per `git range-diff 5009159 4f10965 2d8099c` ariard: ACK 2d8099c, only changes are comment light improvements on IsValid/IsWitnessStandard. Tree-SHA512: c4881546c379ea8efc7ef99a43cbf3b9cd3f9dde5fd97a07ee66f2b593c78aef0bd8784853c5c9c737b66c269241a1048bbbdd6c964a3d872efd8ba0ec410b68
2020-12-01Merge #20425: fuzz: Make CAddrMan fuzzing harness deterministicMarcoFalke
17a5f172fa9ec509b1c3f950ee8dfb6f025534d2 fuzz: Make addrman fuzzing harness deterministic (practicalswift) Pull request description: Make `CAddrMan` fuzzing harness deterministic. See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets). Happy fuzzing :) ACKs for top commit: Crypt-iQ: utACK 17a5f172fa9ec509b1c3f950ee8dfb6f025534d2 Tree-SHA512: 725f983745233e9b616782247fa18847e483c074ca4336a5beea8a9009128c3a74b4d50a12662d8ca2177c2e1fc5fc121834df6b459ac0af43c931d77ef7c4d8
2020-12-01Merge #20496: build: Drop unneeded macOS framework dependenciesJonas Schnelli
ec4a46dd9c158e1a0de144e9abb260da941aa702 build: Drop unneeded IOKit framework dependency (Hennadii Stepanov) 65afe4cb69e80278de0f584b6eeb6741f02a31eb build: Drop unneeded ApplicationServices framework dependency (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: Bitcoin Core codebase does not contain direct dependencies on the `ApplicationServices` and `IOKit` frameworks. ACKs for top commit: jonasschnelli: utACK ec4a46dd9c158e1a0de144e9abb260da941aa702 practicalswift: cr ACK ec4a46dd9c158e1a0de144e9abb260da941aa702: patch looks correct! promag: Tested ACK ec4a46dd9c158e1a0de144e9abb260da941aa702 (not depends build). Tree-SHA512: 47b5ad87d761992850133a921f07d485565c70ba2909a3289050f406e6dbd39ad49e1aeeb6cad79c6914385a72ddffd273dfadd69259a35545a13cd17d0e5043
2020-12-01Merge bitcoin-core/gui#137: refactor: Replace deprecated ↵Jonas Schnelli
Qt::SystemLocale{Short,Long}Date 86b1ab64b1a5b56518787ef16ea54ddbbc97d83e refactor: Replace deprecated Qt::SystemLocale{Short,Long}Date (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: As all deprecated warning in Qt 5.15.0 were eliminated in #46, Qt 5.15.1 introduced another one that is fixed in this PR. Required for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20182. Details in Qt docs: - https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qdatetime.html#toString-1 - https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qdate.html#toString-1 ACKs for top commit: jarolrod: Tested ACK 86b1ab6 on MacOS 10.15.7 and Arch Linux both with Qt 5.15.1 jonasschnelli: Tested ACK 86b1ab64b1a5b56518787ef16ea54ddbbc97d83e Tree-SHA512: 1dbba8ee70c895bf58317172a9901cdbe5503b1d6258f51caaae88d88d332d9fbd4697c995192d31e3618ddfd532c5f5881289b3af1184422e5a9263a1224115
2020-12-01Merge #20222: refactor: CTxMempool constructor clean upMarcoFalke
f15e780b9e57554c723bc02aa41150ecf3e3a8c9 refactor: Clean up CTxMemPool initializer list (Elle Mouton) e3310692d0e9720e960b9785274ce1f0b58b4cd7 refactor: Make CTxMemPool::m_check_ratio a const and a constructor argument (Elle Mouton) 9d4b4b2c2c49774523de740d6492ee5b1ee15e74 refactor: Avoid double to int cast for nCheckFrequency (Elle Mouton) Pull request description: This PR cleans up the CTxMemPool interface by including the ratio used to determine when a mempool sanity check should run in the constructor of CTxMempool instead of using nCheckFrequency which required a cast from a double to a uint32_t. Since nCheckFrequency (now called m_check_ratio) is set in the constructor and only every read from there after, it can be turned into a const and no longer needs to be guarded by the 'cs' lock. Since nCheckFrequency/m_check_ratio no longer needs to lock the 'cs' mutux, mutex lock line in the "CTxMempool::check" function can be moved below where the m_check_ratio variable is checked. Since the variable is 0 by default (meaning that "CTxMempool::check" will most likely not run its logic) this saves us from unnecessarily grabbing the lock. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK f15e780b9e57554c723bc02aa41150ecf3e3a8c9 MarcoFalke: ACK f15e780b9e57554c723bc02aa41150ecf3e3a8c9 👘 glozow: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20222/commits/f15e780b9e57554c723bc02aa41150ecf3e3a8c9 theStack: Code Review ACK f15e780b9e57554c723bc02aa41150ecf3e3a8c9 Tree-SHA512: d83f3b5311ca128847b621e5e999c7e1bf0f4e6261d4cc090fb13e229a0f7eecd66ad997f654f50a838baf708d1515740aa3bffc244909a001d01fd5ae398b68
2020-12-01Merge #20494: refactor: Move node and wallet code out of src/interfacesMarcoFalke
629a9299b2a7241a3fa7d597cb34abcbe1af9255 Move WalletImpl from interfaces/wallet.cpp to wallet/interfaces.cpp (Russell Yanofsky) 2a26771d8161d30be1853a35acfee588cce03634 Move ChainImpl from interfaces/chain.cpp to node/interfaces.cpp (Russell Yanofsky) 12bd0fc9d70333c54c83ebb08c734272dbd330c2 Move NodeImpl from interfaces/node.cpp to node/interfaces.cpp (Russell Yanofsky) Pull request description: This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). --- Move `NodeImpl` from `interfaces/node.cpp` to `node/interfaces.cpp` Move `ChainImpl` from `interfaces/chain.cpp` to `node/interfaces.cpp` Move `WalletImpl` from `interfaces/wallet.cpp` to `wallet/interfaces.cpp` No changes to any classes (can review with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`) Motivation for this change is to move node and wallet code to respective directories where it might fit in better than `src/interfaces/`, but also to remove all unnecessary code from `src/interfaces/` to unblock #19160 review, which has been hung up partially because of code organization. Building on top of this PR, #19160 should now be able to organize interface implementations more understandably in `src/node/` `src/wallet/` `src/ipc/` and `src/init/` directories instead of having so much functionality all in `src/interfaces/` ACKs for top commit: promag: Code review ACK 629a9299b2a7241a3fa7d597cb34abcbe1af9255. MarcoFalke: review ACK 629a9299b2a7241a3fa7d597cb34abcbe1af9255 🔺 Tree-SHA512: 87c2b8fd51519bbd4e5ad3539a79debcf88c3bf021eb28c63f3f555186538b62a0c4cc1a3f07cfb4ff13aea8b0b2fdde505d81f22a5e5fd12a6e375b55a92ab8
2020-12-01Merge #20519: Handle rename failure in DumpMempool(...) by using the ↵MarcoFalke
RenameOver(...) return value. Add [[nodiscard]] to RenameOver(...). ce9dd45422e1f4ecce6df68da086b8bfc2100756 Add [[nodiscard]] to RenameOver(...) (practicalswift) 9429a398e291a1b5edcfc657b94fcaf52cd1d8f9 Handle rename failure in DumpMempool(...) by using RenameOver(...) return value (practicalswift) Pull request description: Handle rename failure in `DumpMempool(...)` by using the `RenameOver(...)` return value. Add `[[nodiscard]]` to `RenameOver(...)` to reduce the risk of similar rename issues in the future. ACKs for top commit: vasild: ACK ce9dd454 theStack: ACK ce9dd45422e1f4ecce6df68da086b8bfc2100756 🏷️ Tree-SHA512: 1e63d7f3061e1f6ea2df5750dbc1547a39bd50b6c529812a0c8a0c11d3100c241afdf14094e69b69a38bade7e54a12b2a42888545874398eaf5d02421b57e874
2020-11-30Merge #20499: Remove obsolete NODISCARD ifdef forest. Use [[nodiscard]] (C++17).MarcoFalke
79bff8e48aca961ec271b0d592aca9278b981e2f Remove NODISCARD (practicalswift) 4848e711076c6ebc5d841feb83baeb6d2bc76c94 scripted-diff: Use [[nodiscard]] (C++17) instead of NODISCARD (practicalswift) Pull request description: Remove obsolete `NODISCARD` `ifdef` forest. Use `[[nodiscard]]` (C++17). ACKs for top commit: theStack: ACK 79bff8e48aca961ec271b0d592aca9278b981e2f fanquake: ACK 79bff8e48aca961ec271b0d592aca9278b981e2f Tree-SHA512: 56dbb8e50ed97ecfbce28cdc688a01146108acae49a943e338a8f983f7168914710d36e38632f6a7c200ba6c6ac35b2519e97d6c985e8e7eb23223f13bf985d6
2020-11-30Merge #20491: refactor: Drop noop gcc version checksfanquake
830ddf413934226d0b6ca99165916790cc52ca18 Drop noop gcc version checks (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: Since #20413 the minimum required GCC version is 7. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 830ddf413934226d0b6ca99165916790cc52ca18 Tree-SHA512: 36264661d6ced1683a0c907efba7c700502acaf8e9fd50d9066bc9c7b877b25165b0684c2d7fe74bd58e500a77d7702bdbdd53691c274f29e4abccd241c10964
2020-11-28Merge bitcoin-core/gui#138: unlock encrypted wallet "OK" button bugfixMarcoFalke
8008ef770f3d0b14d03e22371314500373732143 qt: unlock wallet "OK" button bugfix (Michael Dietz) Pull request description: When trying to send a transaction from an encrypted wallet, the ask passphrase dialog would not allow the user to click the "OK" button and proceed. Therefore it was impossible to send a transaction through the gui. It was not enabling the "OK" button after the passphrase was entered by the user, because it was using the same form validation logic as the "Change passphrase" flow. I reported this in a comment in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/136. But then I realized this seems to be a flat out bug. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 8008ef770f3d0b14d03e22371314500373732143 hebasto: ACK 8008ef770f3d0b14d03e22371314500373732143, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged. Tree-SHA512: cc09b34c7f3aea09729e1c7ccccff05dc11fec56fee2ad369f2d862979572b1edd8b7e738ffe6e91d35d071b819b0c3e0f5d48bf5e27427a80af4a28893f8aaf
2020-11-28Merge #20448: RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Allow specifying wallet_name param ↵MarcoFalke
matching RPC endpoint wallet 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Allow specifying wallet_name param matching RPC endpoint (Luke Dashjr) Pull request description: Allow specifying the `wallet_name` param to `unloadwallet` on RPC wallet endpoints, so long as it matches the endpoint wallet. ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d MarcoFalke: review ACK 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d Tree-SHA512: efb399c33f7b5596870a26a8680f453ca47aa7a6db4e550f9435d13044f1c4bad0ae11e8f0205213409d08b75c4188c3be782e54aafab1f65b97eb8cf5c252a9
2020-11-27qt: unlock wallet "OK" button bugfixMichael Dietz
When trying to send a transaction from an encrypted wallet, the ask passphrase dialog would not allow the user to click the "OK" button and proceed. Therefore it was impossible to send a transaction through the gui. It was not enabling the "OK" button after the passphrase was entered by the user, because it was using the same form validation logic as the "Change passphrase" flow.
2020-11-27Add [[nodiscard]] to RenameOver(...)practicalswift
2020-11-27Handle rename failure in DumpMempool(...) by using RenameOver(...) return valuepracticalswift
2020-11-27refactor: Replace deprecated Qt::SystemLocale{Short,Long}DateHennadii Stepanov
2020-11-26Mention units of MAX_STANDARD_ policy constantsPieter Wuille
2020-11-26Mention in validation that IsWitnessStandard tests for P2TRPieter Wuille
2020-11-26Clean up assets test minimizer LDFLAGSPieter Wuille
2020-11-26Document additional IsWitnessStandard behaviorPieter Wuille
2020-11-26Add comments on CPubKey::IsValidPieter Wuille
2020-11-26Add comments to VerifyTaprootCommitmentPieter Wuille
2020-11-26sync: use HasReason() in double lock testsVasil Dimov
`HasReason()` is shorter than a lambda function.
2020-11-26sync: const-qualify the argument of double_lock_detected()Vasil Dimov
It is not modified in the function, so should be `const`.
2020-11-26sync: print proper lock order location when double lock is detectedVasil Dimov
Before: ``` Assertion failed: detected double lock at src/sync.cpp:153, details in debug log. ``` After: ``` Assertion failed: detected double lock for 'm' in src/test/sync_tests.cpp:40 (in thread ''), details in debug log. ```
2020-11-26Remove NODISCARDpracticalswift
2020-11-26scripted-diff: Use [[nodiscard]] (C++17) instead of NODISCARDpracticalswift
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i "s/NODISCARD/[[nodiscard]]/g" $(git grep -l "NODISCARD" ":(exclude)src/bench/nanobench.h" ":(exclude)src/attributes.h") -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2020-11-25Add MAX_STANDARD_SCRIPTSIG_SIZE to policysanket1729
Bitcoin core has a standardness rule for max satisfaction script sig size. This PR adds to the policy header file so that it is documented along with along policy rules. The initial reasoning that 1650 is an implicit limit(would not reached assuming all other policy rules are being followed) is outdated. As we now know, bitcoin transactions can have spend conditions are more than just signatures and there may exist p2sh transactions involving 100 byte preimages that maybe non-standard because of this rule. Because this rule is no longer implicit, we should explicitly document it in policy header file
2020-11-25build: Drop unneeded ApplicationServices framework dependencyHennadii Stepanov
2020-11-25Merge #19337: sync: detect double lock from the same threadWladimir J. van der Laan
95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6 sync: detect double lock from the same thread (Vasil Dimov) 4df6567e4cbb4677e8048de2f8008612e1b860b9 sync: make EnterCritical() & push_lock() type safe (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: Double lock of the same (non-recursive) mutex from the same thread would produce an undefined behavior. Detect this from `DEBUG_LOCKORDER` and react similarly to the deadlock detection. This came up during discussion in another, related PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19238#discussion_r442394521. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: code review ACK 95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6 hebasto: re-ACK 95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6 Tree-SHA512: 375c62db7819e348bfaecc3bd82a7907fcd8f5af24f7d637ac82f3f16789da9fc127dbd0e37158a08e0dcbba01a55c6635caf1d8e9e827cf5a3747f7690a498e
2020-11-25Merge #19387: span: update constructors to match c++20 draft spec and add ↵MarcoFalke
lifetimebound attribute e3e7446305329ce96e9cf5f5161658eb2e1ea888 Add lifetimebound to attributes for general-purpose usage (Cory Fields) 1d58cc7cb040a70f768b632f294db4e0797d3a34 span: add lifetimebound attribute (Cory Fields) 62733fee874bfe7e833e71380eb8efd6a3126fbd span: (almost) match std::span's constructor behavior (Cory Fields) Pull request description: Replaces #19382 with a different approach. See [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19382#discussion_r446332852) for the reasoning behind the switch. -- Description from #19382: See [here](http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0936r0.pdf) for more detail on lifetimebound. This is implemented using preprocesor macros rather than configure checks in order to keep span.h self-contained. The ```[[clang::lifetimebound]]``` syntax was chosen over ```__attribute__((lifetimebound))``` because the former is more flexible and works to guard ```this``` as well as function parameters, and also because at least for now, it's available only in clang. There are currently no violations in our codebase, but this can easily be tested by inserting one like this somewhere and compiling with a modern clang: ```c++ Span<const int> bad(std::vector<int>{1,2,3}); ``` The result: > warning: temporary whose address is used as value of local variable 'bad' will be destroyed at the end of the full-expression [-Wdangling] Span<const int> bad(std::vector<int>{1,2,3}); ``` ACKs for top commit: sipa: ACK e3e7446305329ce96e9cf5f5161658eb2e1ea888 ajtowns: ACK e3e7446305329ce96e9cf5f5161658eb2e1ea888 (drive by; only a quick skim of code and some basic sanity checks) MarcoFalke: review ACK e3e7446305329ce96e9cf5f5161658eb2e1ea888 🔗 jonatack: ACK e3e7446 change since last review is adding `[[clang::lifetimebound]]` as `LIFETIMEBOUND` to src/attributes.h as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19387#issuecomment-650752959. Tree-SHA512: 05a3440ee595ef0e8d693a2820b360707695c016a68e15df47c20cd8d053646cc6c8cca8addd7db40e72b3fce208879a41c8102ba7ae9223e4366e5de1175211
2020-11-25qt: Improve comments in WalletController::getOrCreateWallet()Hennadii Stepanov
2020-11-25qt: Call setParent() in the parent's contextHennadii Stepanov
setParent(parent) calls sendEvent(parent, QChildEvent) that implies running in the thread which created the parent object.
2020-11-25qt: Add ObjectInvoke template functionHennadii Stepanov
This is a replacement of the QMetaObject::invokeMethod functor overload which is available in Qt 5.10+. Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
2020-11-25Drop noop gcc version checksHennadii Stepanov
Since #20413 the minimum required GCC version is 7. Co-authored-by: practicalswift <practicalswift@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-11-25Merge #20403: wallet: upgradewallet fixes, improvements, test coverageMarcoFalke
3eb6f8b2e61c24a22ea9396d86672307845f35eb wallet (not for backport): improve upgradewallet error messages (Jon Atack) ca8cd893bb56bf5d455154b0498b1f58f77d20ed wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet error responses (Jon Atack) 99d56e357159c7154f69f28cb5587c5ca20d6594 wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet result responses (Jon Atack) 2498b04ce88696a3216fc38b7d393906b733e8b1 Don't upgrade to HD split if it is already supported (Andrew Chow) c46c18b788cb0862aafbb116fd37936cbed6a431 wallet: refactor GetClosestWalletFeature() (Jon Atack) Pull request description: This follows up on #18836 and #20282 to fix and improve the as-yet unreleased `upgradewallet` feature and also implement review follow-up in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18836#discussion_r519328607. This PR fixes 4 upgradewallet issues: - this bug: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20403#discussion_r526063920 - it returns nothing in the absence of an RPC error, which isn't reassuring for users - it returns the same thing both in the case of a successful upgrade and when no upgrade took place - the error message object is currently dead code This PR fixes the above and provides: ...user feedback to not silently return without upgrading ``` { "wallet_name": "disable private keys", "previous_version": 169900, "current_version": 169900, "result": "Already at latest version. Wallet version unchanged." } ``` ...better feedback after successfully upgrading ``` { "wallet_name": "watch-only", "previous_version": 159900, "current_version": 169900, "result": "Wallet upgraded successfully from version 159900 to version 169900." } ``` ...helpful error responses ``` { "wallet_name": "blank", "previous_version": 169900, "current_version": 169900, "error": "Cannot downgrade wallet from version 169900 to version 159900. Wallet version unchanged." } { "wallet_name": "blank", "previous_version": 130000, "current_version": 130000, "error": "Cannot upgrade a non HD split wallet from version 130000 to version 169899 without upgrading to support pre-split keypool. Please use version 169900 or no version specified." } ``` updated help: ``` upgradewallet ( version ) Upgrade the wallet. Upgrades to the latest version if no version number is specified. New keys may be generated and a new wallet backup will need to be made. Arguments: 1. version (numeric, optional, default=169900) The version number to upgrade to. Default is the latest wallet version. Result: { (json object) "wallet_name" : "str", (string) Name of wallet this operation was performed on "previous_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet before this operation "current_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet after this operation "result" : "str", (string, optional) Description of result, if no error "error" : "str" (string, optional) Error message (if there is one) } ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 3eb6f8b MarcoFalke: review ACK 3eb6f8b2e61c24a22ea9396d86672307845f35eb 🛡 Tree-SHA512: b767314069e26b5933b123acfea6aa40708507f504bdb22884da020a4ca1332af38a7072b061e36281533af9f4e236d94d3c129daf6fe5b55241127537038eed
2020-11-25Merge #20469: build: Avoid secp256k1.h include from systemWladimir J. van der Laan
e95aaefe2540cb76969818fcc2ff77d33448ed5a build: Avoid secp256k1.h include from system (Niklas Gögge) Pull request description: While building i ran into an error because i had a version of `secp256k1.h` under `/usr/local/include` that was incompatible with the secp256k1 code in the repository. This caused a problem because `$(BOOST_CPPFLAGS)` contained `-I/usr/local/include` and the include paths are searched by the compiler in order from left to right, so in the end `$(BITCOIN_INCLUDES)` contained `-I/usr/local/include` before `-I$(srcdir)/secp256k1/include` which caused the compiler to find `secp256k1.h` under `/usr/local/include`. Looking at git blame i am wondering how this has not happened to anyone else in several years: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blame/cb89e18845852c005ba8ab94acc6544d7c876a42/src/Makefile.am#L25 I am on macOS 10.15. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK e95aaefe2540cb76969818fcc2ff77d33448ed5a hebasto: ACK e95aaefe2540cb76969818fcc2ff77d33448ed5a, tested on macOS 11 Big Sur by adding `#error` into `/usr/local/include/secp256k1.h`. Tree-SHA512: 1f0b395725936c179ab60dee3582ec7b21e2f9c0f1895e160d84a487cf0db16d0c7aa47d05800e0aded31685b4362056cac9b9ecca1bb8c308a4c5a810e8dc1d
2020-11-25Merge #20410: wallet: Do not treat default constructed types as None-typeMarcoFalke
fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d wallet: Do not treat default constructed types as None-type (MarcoFalke) fac4e136fa3d0fab7fde900a6be921313e16e7a6 refactor: Change pointer to reference because it can not be null (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Equating `0==None` and `""==None` is confusing, unneeded and undocumented ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d achow101: ACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d Sjors: tACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d modulo `unset` Tree-SHA512: c4c8d0ad80c6697621d356a9545caf28ca2facc82bb2fa8e70eceb52372d25f0685237c73688c4b01da0e75d213c77c0d45011a8bdfe81ea783d85f045786dac
2020-11-24Move WalletImpl from interfaces/wallet.cpp to wallet/interfaces.cppRussell Yanofsky
2020-11-24Move ChainImpl from interfaces/chain.cpp to node/interfaces.cppRussell Yanofsky
No changes to ChainImpl or any related classes (review with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`)
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-11-12 22:01:19 +0000