| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
3cb9ce85d0c6d01217babf0df7efc2eabde1b12f Document strenghtening (Pieter Wuille)
1d207bc46f995ad3b5ae89bb504affaca09d10b1 Add hash strengthening to the RNG (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This patch improves the built-in RNG using hash strengthening.
At startup, and once every minute, 32 bytes of entropy are produced from the RNG, repeatedly hashed using SHA512 for 10ms, and then fed back into the RNG, together with high-precision timestamps obtained every 1000 iterations.
ACKs for commit 3cb9ce:
pstratem:
utACK 3cb9ce85d0c6d01217babf0df7efc2eabde1b12f
Tree-SHA512: 4fb6f61639b392697beb81c5f0903f79f10dd1087bed7f34de2abb5c22704a671e37b2d828ed141492491863efb1e7d1fa04408a1d32c9de2f2cc8ac406bbe57
|
|
fa86c8aec6 init: Remove dead code in LoadChainTip (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`LoadChainTip` sets `::ChainActive()` based on `pcoinsTip`'s best block. `LoadChainTip` is never called when that block is null, so we can remove all code from within that method that is only executed when that block is null.
Fixes #15967 Inconsistent locking behavior in LoadChainTip
ACKs for commit fa86c8:
promag:
utACK fa86c8aec611a9b9d2f53960c92419cf2a8bb92d.
practicalswift:
utACK fa86c8aec611a9b9d2f53960c92419cf2a8bb92d
Empact:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15999/commits/fa86c8aec611a9b9d2f53960c92419cf2a8bb92d
laanwj:
utACK fa86c8aec611a9b9d2f53960c92419cf2a8bb92d
ryanofsky:
utACK fa86c8aec611a9b9d2f53960c92419cf2a8bb92d. LoadChainTip isn't called currently when pcoinsTip best block is null due to this line:
jamesob:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15999/commits/fa86c8aec611a9b9d2f53960c92419cf2a8bb92d
Tree-SHA512: 8961c0e579800a52038ac5655478468852faac055299b64d6cfdf0c213d3bf09669c4889467d09d93457f6c8b073967bb0475a137f77ddd3a3a3c03ad90001c4
|
|
Remove assumeLocked().
9402ef0739 Remove temporary method assumeLocked(). Remove LockingStateImpl. Remove redundant cs_main locks. (practicalswift)
593a8e8a2c wallet: Use chain.lock() instead of temporary chain.assumeLocked() (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Fixes #16028.
Problem description:
`LockAnnotation lock(::cs_main)` is a guarantee to the compiler thread analysis that `::cs_main` is locked (when it couldn't be determined otherwise).
Despite being annotated with the locking guarantee ...
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/65526fc8666fef35ef908dbc225f706bef642c7e/src/interfaces/chain.cpp#L134-L138
... `getTipLocator()` reads `chainActive` (via `::ChainActive()`) without holding `cs_main`.
This can be verified by adding the following `AssertLockHeld(cs_main)`:
```
$ git diff
diff --git a/src/interfaces/chain.cpp b/src/interfaces/chain.cpp
index 59623284d..9fc693a0f 100644
--- a/src/interfaces/chain.cpp
+++ b/src/interfaces/chain.cpp
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ class LockImpl : public Chain::Lock
CBlockLocator getTipLocator() override
{
LockAnnotation lock(::cs_main);
+ AssertLockHeld(::cs_main);
return ::ChainActive().GetLocator();
}
Optional<int> findLocatorFork(const CBlockLocator& locator) override
$ make check
../build-aux/test-driver: line 107: 12881 Aborted "$@" > $log_file 2>&1
FAIL: qt/test/test_bitcoin-qt
```
ACKs for commit 9402ef:
MarcoFalke:
utACK 9402ef0739fdcd8e989c07c0595095e9608b243c
ryanofsky:
utACK 9402ef0739fdcd8e989c07c0595095e9608b243c. Changes are consolidating commits and removing redundant lock2 cs_main calls
Tree-SHA512: 0a030bf0c07eb53194ecc246f973ef389dd42a0979f51932bf94bdf7e90c52473ae03be49718ee1629582b05dd8e0dc020b5a210318c93378ea4ace90c0f9f72
|
|
redundant cs_main locks.
|
|
|
|
41ab2a892456f4f3e27128a7f9237bc45cc288dd fix static_assert for macro HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL (orient)
Pull request description:
Utils and libraries: fix static_assert for macro HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL if define DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION
ACKs for commit 41ab2a:
laanwj:
utACK 41ab2a892456f4f3e27128a7f9237bc45cc288dd
Tree-SHA512: 6c1d20375a70cbdef1140c544f443106d6bf6c34b1da2ddc66739f2b662a0d6b800288f48bf451a3d5937bac7e40b8ecda3a4effcc978d0093fc497410447ea7
|
|
8794a4b3ae4d34a4cd21a7dee9f694eef7726a4f QA: add test for HKDF HMAC_SHA256 L32 (Jonas Schnelli)
551d489416339dae8f9d896013cd060a21406e2b Add HKDF HMAC_SHA256 L=32 implementations (Jonas Schnelli)
3b64f852e400c552f031697d6a86829dc6e74bd6 QA: add test for CKey::Negate() (Jonas Schnelli)
463921bb649d644f79f9d7f0f96f10aa0d165f76 CKey: add method to negate the key (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
This adds a limited implementation of `HKDF` (defined by rfc5869) that supports only HMAC-SHA256 and length output of 32 bytes (will be required for v2 transport protocol).
This PR also includes a method to negate a private key which is useful to enforce public keys starting with 0x02 (or 0x03) (a requirement for the v2 transport protocol). The new `CKey::Negate()` method is pretty much a wrapper around `secp256k1_ec_privkey_negate()`.
Including tests.
This is a subset of #14032 and a pre-requirement for the v2 transport protocol.
ACKs for commit 8794a4:
Tree-SHA512: 5341929dfa29f5da766ec3612784baec6a3ad69972f08b5a985a8aafdae4dae36f104a2b888d1f5d1f33561456bd111f960d7e32c2cc4fd18e48358468f26c1a
|
|
fa8ced32a60dea37ac169241cf9a1f708ef46c4b doc: Mention blocksonly in reduce-traffic.md, unhide option (MarcoFalke)
fa320de79faaca2b088fcbe7f76701faa9bff236 test: Add test for p2p_blocksonly (MarcoFalke)
fa3872e7b4540857261aed948b94b6b2bfdbc3d1 test: Format predicate source as multiline on error (MarcoFalke)
fa1dce7329d3e74d46ab98b93772b1832a3f1819 net: Rename ::fRelayTxes to ::g_relay_txes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is de-facto no longer hidden
ACKs for commit fa8ced:
jamesob:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/fa8ced32a60dea37ac169241cf9a1f708ef46c4b
Tree-SHA512: 474fbdee6cbd035ed9068a066b6056c1f909ec7520be0417820fcd1672ab3069b53f55c5147968978d9258fd3a3933fe1a9ef8e4f6e14fb6ebbd79701a0a1245
|
|
662d1171d9e29964b039ba4c5bc8a2304426c003 Add option to create an encrypted wallet (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a new `passphrase` argument to `createwallet` which will create a wallet that is encrypted with that passphrase.
This is built on #15226 because it needs to first create an empty wallet, then encrypt the empty wallet and generate new keys that have only been stored in an encrypted state.
ACKs for commit 662d11:
laanwj:
utACK 662d1171d9e29964b039ba4c5bc8a2304426c003
jnewbery:
Looks great. utACK 662d1171d9e29964b039ba4c5bc8a2304426c003
Tree-SHA512: a53fc9a0f341eaec1614eb69abcf2d48eb4394bc89041ab69bfc05a63436ed37c65ad586c07fd37dc258ac7c7d5e4f7f93b4191407f5824bbf063b4c50894c4a
|
|
fa7e311e16 [doc] rpcwallet: Only fail rescan when blocks have been pruned (MarcoFalke)
aaaa57c2aa scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers in wallet (MarcoFalke)
faf3729242 wallet: Only fail rescan when blocks have actually been pruned (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This brings the behaviour of the import* calls closer to importmulti. After this change, the difference between importmulti and the other import* calls is
* that in importmulti you can "opt-out" of scanning early blocks by setting a later timestamp.
* that in importmulti the wallet will successfully import the data, but fail to rescan. Whereas in the other calls, the wallet will abort before importing the data.
ACKs for commit fa7e31:
promag:
utACK fa7e311e169349bfcf1dab8b980724e8ddf4e749.
jnewbery:
utACK fa7e311e169349bfcf1dab8b980724e8ddf4e749
Tree-SHA512: a57d52ffea94b64e0eb9b5d3a7a63031325833908297dd14eb0c5251ffea3b2113b131003f1db4e9599e014369165a57f107a7150bb65e4c791e5fe742f33cb8
|
|
c01c065b9ded3399a6a480f15543827dd5e8eb4d Do not construct out-of-bound pointers in SHA512/SHA1/RIPEMD160 code (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This looks like an issue in the current SHA256/512 code, where a pointer outside of the area pointed to may be constructed (this is UB in theory, though in practice every supported platform treats pointers as integers).
I discovered this while investigating #14580. Sadly, it does not fix it.
ACKs for commit c01c06:
practicalswift:
utACK c01c065b9ded3399a6a480f15543827dd5e8eb4d
Tree-SHA512: 47660e00f164f38c36a1ab46e52dd91cd33cfda6a6048d67541c2f8e73c050d4d9d81b5c149bfad281212d52f204f57bebf5b19879dc7a6a5f48aa823fbc2c02
|
|
1b05dff080fe50937a02cfde661db58ace21c553 Fix portability issue with pthreads (grim-trigger)
Pull request description:
This change resolves the following issue:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15951
Only tested on OpenBSD 6.5/amd64
ACKs for commit 1b05df:
fanquake:
tACK 1b05dff. Tested on OpenBSD6.4 (`vagrant`).
laanwj:
utACK 1b05dff080fe50937a02cfde661db58ace21c553
Tree-SHA512: af48581af32820d5adc9ae5abb44f8f1b592c323f86fe2484108b81629389f6ef347598f9a087aa6476ac553e59828cd7927bb4ab11dc70e7c9a944a92fc54ae
|
|
|
|
2d5cf4c41d rpc: Speedup getrawmempool when verbose=true (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Instead of calling `pushKV(hash, info)`, which incurs in duplicate key checks, call `__pushKV` which (currently) doesn't.
Improves RPC `getrawmempool` and REST `/rest/mempool/contents.json`.
Fixes #14765.
ACKs for commit 2d5cf4:
Tree-SHA512: c3e91371bb41f39e79dcef820815e1dc27fb689ca3c4bf3a00467d2215b3baecd44d9792f7a481577a5b7ae1fc6cbaa07b1cd62123b845082eba65b35c2b3ca5
|
|
f1a77b0c51 [docs] Add doxygen comment for CReserveKey (John Newbery)
37796b2dd4 [docs] Add doxygen comment for CKeyPool (John Newbery)
ef2d515af3 [wallet] move-only: move CReserveKey to be next to CKeyPool (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Docs/move-only
Adds doxygen comments for the CKeyPool and CReserveKey objects. The way these work is pretty confusing and it's easy to overlook details (eg https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15557#discussion_r271956393).
These are on the verbose side, but I think too much commenting is better than not enough. Happy to take feedback on what's an appropriate level.
ACKs for commit f1a77b:
jonatack:
Thanks, John. Re-ACK f1a77b0c5176306ca9f6f30211e32d3502ed4281, doc-only changes with respect to previous review.
jb55:
ACK f1a77b0c5176306ca9f6f30211e32d3502ed4281
Tree-SHA512: 8bc97c7029cd2e8d9bfd2d2144eeff73474c71eda5a9d10817e1578ca0b70da677252037d83143faaff1808e2193408a21a8a89d36049eac77fd313990f0b67b
|
|
f6bb11fd37 Add test for ArgsManager::GetChainName (Russell Yanofsky)
4b331159df Add unit test NextString, ForEachNoDup functions (Russell Yanofsky)
05bfee3451 util_SettingsMerge test cleanup (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
There was some test coverage previously, but it was limited and didn't test conflicting and negated arguments.
ACKs for commit f6bb11:
MarcoFalke:
re-utACK f6bb11fd37f8a2c985786b688ea07699ba75780e
Tree-SHA512: d03596614dc48584c7a9440117b107c6abb23fd4c7fa15fb4015351ec3de08b2656bc956ce05310663675672343d7a6aff35421657f29172080c7005045680b0
|
|
fa3c651143 [refactor] interfaces: Add missing LockAnnotation for cs_main (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This adds missing `LockAnnotation lock(::cs_main);` to `src/interfaces/chain.cpp` (as well as tests and benchmarks)
ACKs for commit fa3c65:
practicalswift:
utACK fa3c6511435149782545ac0d09d4722dc115d709
ryanofsky:
utACK fa3c6511435149782545ac0d09d4722dc115d709
Tree-SHA512: b67082fe3718c94b4addf7f2530593915225c25080f20c3ffa4ff7e08f1f49548f255fb285f89a8feff84be3f6c91e1792495ced9f6bf396732396d1356d597a
|
|
|
|
|
|
ccc27bdcd2 doc: Clarify -blocksdir usage (Daniel McNally)
Pull request description:
This PR attempts to clarify and correct the `-blocksdir` argument description and default value. `-blocksdir` does not refer to the full path to the actual `blocks` directory, but rather the root/parent directory which contains the `blocks` directory. Accordingly, the default value is `<datadir>` and not `<datadir>/blocks` - this behavior of defaulting to the datadir can also be seen in init.cpp:
```cpp
if (gArgs.IsArgSet("-blocksdir")) {
path = fs::system_complete(gArgs.GetArg("-blocksdir", ""));
if (!fs::is_directory(path)) {
path = "";
return path;
}
} else {
path = GetDataDir(false);
}
```
It also attempts to clarify that only the `.dat` files containing block data are impacted by `-blocksdir`, not the index files.
I believe this would close #12828.
ACKs for commit ccc27b:
hebasto:
utACK ccc27bdcd2d91fe2c023ad004019d5b970f21dbf
Tree-SHA512: 7b65f66b0579fd56e8c8cd4f9f22d6af56181817762a68deccd7fca51820ad82d9a0c48f5f1f012e746c67bcdae7af4555fad867cb620a9ca538d465c9d86c2b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d20d756752 rpc: faster getblockstats using BlockUndo data (Felix Weis)
Pull request description:
Using undo data for a block (rev?????.dat) we can retrieve value information about prevouts and calculate the final transaction fee (rate). This approach is about 80x faster, drops the requirement for `-txindex`, and works for all non-pruned blocks.
```
# 2018-11-25T16:36:19Z Bitcoin Core version v0.17.99.0-edc715240-dirty (release build)
seq 550100 550200 0.00s user 0.00s system 62% cpu 0.004 total
xargs -n1 src/bitcoin-cli getblockstats 0.21s user 0.19s system 17% cpu 2.302 total
# 2018-11-25T16:39:17Z Bitcoin Core version v0.17.0 (release build)
seq 550100 550200 0.00s user 0.00s system 87% cpu 0.002 total
xargs -n1 src/bitcoin-cli getblockstats 0.24s user 0.22s system 0% cpu 3:19.42 total
```
ACKs for commit d20d75:
MarcoFalke:
re-utACK d20d7567528e216badb8475df298bb3cec008985
Tree-SHA512: 5babc3eb8d2fee2cb23dc12f522656b80737a540cbf2b13390a8f388304c46c064cca76f896b46a6e2abae8cc582d28e1ab20dd4bb17ad6142f20630c2d30c54
|
|
Using undo data for a block (rev?????.dat) we can retrieve value information about prevouts and calculate the final transaction fee (rate). This approach is about 80x faster, drops the requirement for -txindex, and works for all non-pruned blocks.
|
|
510c6532ba Extract ParseDescriptorRange (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
So as to be consistently informative when the checks fail, and
to protect against unintentional divergence among the checks.
ACKs for commit 510c65:
meshcollider:
Oh apologies, yes. Thanks :) utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15744/commits/510c6532bae9abc5beda1c126c945923a64680cb
MarcoFalke:
utACK 510c6532bae9abc5beda1c126c945923a64680cb
sipa:
utACK 510c6532bae9abc5beda1c126c945923a64680cb
Tree-SHA512: b1f0792bfaa163890a20654a0fc2c4c4a996659916bf5f4a495662436b39326692a1a0c825caafd859e48c05f5dd1865c4f7c28092be5074edda3c94f94f9f8b
|
|
2dfe27517 Add ChaCha20 bench (Jonas Schnelli)
2bc2b8b49 Add ChaCha20 encryption option (XOR) (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
The current ChaCha20 implementation does not support message encryption (it can only output the keystream which is sufficient for the RNG).
This PR adds the actual XORing of the `plaintext` with the `keystream` in order to return the desired `ciphertext`.
Required for v2 message transport protocol.
ACKs for commit 2dfe27:
jnewbery:
Looks good. utACK 2dfe2751713c814aea53b5a7563eb74ad1baea00.
jnewbery:
utACK 2dfe2751713c814aea53b5a7563eb74ad1baea00
sipa:
utACK 2dfe2751713c814aea53b5a7563eb74ad1baea00
ryanofsky:
utACK 2dfe2751713c814aea53b5a7563eb74ad1baea00. Changes since last review are just renaming the Crypt method, adding comments, and simplifying the benchmark.
Tree-SHA512: 84bb234da2ca9fdc44bc29a786d9dd215520f81245270c1aef801ef66b6091b7793e2eb38ad6dbb084925245065c5dce9e5582f2d0fa220ab3e182d43412d5b5
|
|
types
78e407ad0c26190a22de1bc8ed900164a44a36c3 GetKeyBirthTimes should return key ids, not destinations (Gregory Sanders)
70946e7fee54323ce6a5ea8aeb377e2c7c790bc6 Replace CScriptID and CKeyID in CTxDestination with dedicated types (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
The current usage seems to be an overloading of meanings. `CScriptID` is used in the wallet as a lookup key, as well as a destination, and `CKeyID` likewise. Instead, have all destinations be dedicated types.
New types:
`CScriptID`->`ScriptHash`
`CKeyID`->`PKHash`
ACKs for commit 78e407:
ryanofsky:
utACK 78e407ad0c26190a22de1bc8ed900164a44a36c3. Only changes are removing extra CScriptID()s and fixing the test case.
Sjors:
utACK 78e407a
meshcollider:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15452/commits/78e407ad0c26190a22de1bc8ed900164a44a36c3
Tree-SHA512: 437f59fc3afb83a40540da3351507aef5aed44e3a7f15b01ddad6226854edeee762ff0b0ef336fe3654c4cd99a205cef175211de8b639abe1130c8a6313337b9
|
|
This helps to distinguish it from CNode::fRelayTxes and avoid bugs like
425278d17bd0edf8a3a7cc81e55016f7fd8e7726
|
|
e0bb279999 Doc: remove text about txes always relayed from -whitelist (David A. Harding)
Pull request description:
Updates text since -whitelistforcerelay was set to false by default in PR #15193.
ACKs for commit e0bb27:
fanquake:
utACK e0bb279
MarcoFalke:
utACK e0bb2799992afe88e6f4efc6d90ed82ddf1ec5ec
Tree-SHA512: cf0c9321d72692d573039a04f8f1d048cbdf67ed86cc781523dabd3c45d2731b788f53749e6bb29d7da1ab44eb04030f352469b20489bb2a26c2c38fb61f6489
|
|
requirement in LimitValidationInterfaceQueue
62d50ef308 Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
This PR adds compile-time checking for negative locking requirements that follow from the run-time locking requirement `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)` in `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)`.
Changes:
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `CChainState::ActivateBestChain(…)`, `CChainState:: InvalidateBlock(…)` and `CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(…)` which all call `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `InvalidateBlock(…)` which calls `CChainState::InvalidateBlock(...)` which in turn calls `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `RewindBlockIndex(…)` which calls `CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(...)` which in turn calls `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
ACKs for commit 62d50e:
MarcoFalke:
utACK 62d50ef308
Tree-SHA512: 73d092ccd08c851ae3c5d60370c369fc030c5793f5507e2faccb6f91c851ddc0ce059fbea3899f2856330d7a8c78f2ac6a2988e8268b03154f946be9e60e3be1
|
|
a0a222eec Replace deprecated Boost Filesystem function (Hennadii Stepanov)
4f65af97b Remove dead code for walletFile check (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Boost Filesystem `basename()` and `extension()` functions are [deprecated since v1.36.0](https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_36_0/libs/filesystem/doc/reference.html#Convenience-functions).
See more: https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2010/01/160905.php
Also this PR prevents further use of deprecated Boost Filesystem functions.
Ref: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_64_0/libs/filesystem/doc/index.htm#Coding-guidelines
Note: On my Linux system Boost 1.65.1 header `/usr/include/boost/filesystem/convenience.hpp` contains:
```c++
# ifndef BOOST_FILESYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED
inline std::string extension(const path & p)
{
return p.extension().string();
}
inline std::string basename(const path & p)
{
return p.stem().string();
}
inline path change_extension( const path & p, const path & new_extension )
{
path new_p( p );
new_p.replace_extension( new_extension );
return new_p;
}
# endif
```
UPDATE:
Also removed unused code as [noted](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15880#discussion_r279386614) by **ryanofsky**.
ACKs for commit a0a222:
Empact:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15880/commits/a0a222eec0b7f615a756e5e0dcec9b02296f999c
practicalswift:
utACK a0a222eec0b7f615a756e5e0dcec9b02296f999c
fanquake:
utACK a0a222e
ryanofsky:
utACK a0a222eec0b7f615a756e5e0dcec9b02296f999c. Only change is dropping assert and squashing first two commits.
Tree-SHA512: bc54355441c49957507eb8d3a5782b92d65674504d69779bc16b1b997b2e7424d5665eb6bfb6e10b430a6cacd2aca70af2f94e5f7f10bea24624202834ad35c7
|
|
AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to functions calling LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to functions calling CChainState::InvalidateBlock(...) which calls LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which in turn does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to functions calling CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(...) which calls LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which in turn does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
|
|
There was some test coverage previously, but it was limited and didn't test
conflicting and negated arguments.
|
|
486c1eea86 refactoring: remove unused chainActive (James O'Beirne)
631940aab2 scripted-diff: replace chainActive -> ::ChainActive() (James O'Beirne)
a3a609079c refactoring: introduce unused ChainActive() (James O'Beirne)
1b6e6fcfd2 rename: CChainState.chainActive -> m_chain (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the assumeutxo project:
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/2019-04-proposal/proposal
---
This change refactors the `chainActive` reference into a `::ChainActive()` call. It also distinguishes `CChainState`'s `CChain` data member as `m_chain` instead of the current `chainActive`, which makes it easily confused with the global data.
The active chain must be obtained via function because its reference will be swapped at some point during runtime after loading a UTXO snapshot.
This change, though lengthy, should be pretty easy to review since most of it is contained within a scripted-diff. Once merged, the parent PR should be easier to review.
ACKs for commit 486c1e:
Sjors:
utACK 486c1ee
promag:
utACK 486c1ee.
practicalswift:
utACK 486c1eea863a41e597ae4fddc392f446f2518b4b
Tree-SHA512: 06ed8f9e77f2d25fc9bea0ba86436d80dbbce90a1e8be23e37ec4eeb26060483e60b4a5c4fba679cb1867f61e3921c24abeb9cabdfb4d0a9b1c4ddd77b17456a
|
|
Remove testcase generating code from util_SettingsMerge so it can be reused in
new tests.
The hash value expected in util_SettingsMerge changes as a result of this, but
only because the testcases are generated in a different order, not because any
cases are added or removed. It is possible to verify this with:
SETTINGS_MERGE_TEST_OUT=new.txt test/test_bitcoin --run_test=util_tests/util_SettingsMerge
git checkout HEAD~1
make test/test_bitcoin
SETTINGS_MERGE_TEST_OUT=old.txt test/test_bitcoin --run_test=util_tests/util_SettingsMerge
diff -u <(sort old.txt) <(sort new.txt)
The new output is a little more readable, with simpler testcases sorted first.
|
|
Followup to #15869. Treat "-wallet" as the network-specific argument in test
instead of "-server", to make test output clearer and be more consistent with
bitcoind. Update embedded hash to match changed output from this.
|
|
fix static_assert for macro HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL while define DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION
|
|
This change resolves the following issue:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15951
Only tested on OpenBSD 6.5/amd64
|
|
|
|
Once every minute, this will feed the RNG state through repeated SHA512
for 10ms. The timings of that operation are used as entropy source as
well.
|
|
|
|
d2eee87928 Lift prevector default vals to the member declaration (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
I overlooked this possibility in #14028
ACKs for commit d2eee8:
promag:
utACK d2eee87, change looks good because members are always initialized.
251Labs:
utACK d2eee87 nice one.
ken2812221:
utACK d2eee87928781ab3082d4279aa6f19641a45e801
practicalswift:
utACK d2eee87928781ab3082d4279aa6f19641a45e801
scravy:
utACK d2eee87928781ab3082d4279aa6f19641a45e801
Tree-SHA512: f2726bae1cf892fd680cf8571027bcdc2e42ba567eaa901fb5fb5423b4d11b29e745e0163d82cb513d8c81399cc85933a16ed66d4a30829382d4721ffc41dc97
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./src/wallet/
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
|
|
b6c748f84909212dce73e4b77aa125ed1e108a10 doc: Add release notes for 15730 (João Barbosa)
d3e8458365ab29017241bc43204fe81cb7fd8530 rpc: Show scanning details in getwalletinfo (João Barbosa)
90e27abe37cc84c7b206f20d28aafe32e71e7209 wallet: Track current scanning progress (João Barbosa)
2ee811e6930cf76ea51e6826fe437ed888688adc wallet: Track scanning duration (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Closes #15724.
ACKs for commit b6c748:
MarcoFalke:
re-utACK b6c748f849 (Only change since my last review is rebase, adding release notes, and returning false instead of null)
laanwj:
utACK b6c748f84909212dce73e4b77aa125ed1e108a10
jonatack:
ACK b6c748f84909212dce73e4b77aa125ed1e108a10, only changes appear to be rebase for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15730#discussion_r280030617 and release notes.
Tree-SHA512: 8ee98f971c15f66ce8138fc92c55e51abc9faf01866a31ac7ce2ad766aa2bb88559eabee3b5815d645c84cdf1c19dc35ec03f31461e39bc5f6040edec0b87116
|
|
facfb4111d14a3b06c46690a2cca7ca91cea8a96 rpc: Deprecate getunconfirmedbalance and getwalletinfo balances (MarcoFalke)
999931cf8f167c7547f1015cdf05437a460c27f0 rpc: Add getbalances RPC (MarcoFalke)
fad13e925e197163a942f3f0d1ba2c95a2b65a56 rpcwallet: Make helper methods const on CWallet (MarcoFalke)
fad40ec9151248c6e8225e14980424f581d23e02 wallet: Use IsValidNumArgs in getwalletinfo rpc (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This exposes the `CWallet::GetBalance()` struct over RPC.
In the future, incorrectly named rpcs such as `getunconfirmedbalance` or rpcs redundant to this such as `getbalance` could be removed.
ACKs for commit facfb4:
jnewbery:
utACK facfb4111d14a3b06c46690a2cca7ca91cea8a96
Tree-SHA512: 1f54fedce55df9a8ea82d2b6265354b39a956072621876ebaee2355aac0e23c7b64340c3279502415598c095858529e18b50789be956250aafda1cd3a8d948a5
|
|
fc929842c20ac81869a33edce765e389a46e6c0c GUI: Move QRImageWidget to its own file-pair (Luke Dashjr)
77851ab682bf94f78874a245919bcc4b79dc054e GUI: Refactor actual QR code rendering into new QRImageWidget::setQR (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
For at least QR-code based pairing of mobile wallets with nodes, it will be desirable to render QR codes even without wallet support.
Therefore, this prepares by moving the QRImageWidget out of a wallet-specific file into its own `qrencoder` file-pair.
ACKs for commit fc9298:
laanwj:
utACK fc929842c20ac81869a33edce765e389a46e6c0c
jonasschnelli:
utACK fc929842c20ac81869a33edce765e389a46e6c0c
Tree-SHA512: 95529a38c0573a4b3f1253fb5f11ca07a5b3a9840ec24acc7d87270212f3c9f7c5b186d9274d297517a3b80494f38a57574fb9730b1574db01688539b987bd91
|
|
0ff1c2a838da9e8dc7f77609adc89124bbea3e2b Separate reason for premature spends (coinbase/locktime) (Suhas Daftuar)
54470e767bab37f9b7089782b1be73d5883bb244 Assert validation reasons are contextually correct (Suhas Daftuar)
2120c31521aa51aa1984ee33250b8320506d3a0f [refactor] Update some comments in validation.cpp as we arent doing DoS there (Matt Corallo)
12dbdd7a41bac73e51ed8f7b290b7671196bf9ea [refactor] Drop unused state.DoS(), state.GetDoS(), state.CorruptionPossible() (Matt Corallo)
aa502b88d10c2c3ac56d9163555849b96dc4df1e scripted-diff: Remove DoS calls to CValidationState (Matt Corallo)
7721ad64f40a0c67edefaaf7353264d78df8803e [refactor] Prep for scripted-diff by removing some \ns which annoy sed. (Matt Corallo)
5e78c5734bb0c9aae7b0a7019a745b2d7059b3d9 Allow use of state.Invalid() for all reasons (Matt Corallo)
6b34bc6b6f54f85537494cbea3846d5d195a06d9 Fix handling of invalid headers (Suhas Daftuar)
ef54b486d5333dfc85c56e6b933c81735196a25d [refactor] Use Reasons directly instead of DoS codes (Matt Corallo)
9ab2a0412e96e87956fe61257387683635213035 CorruptionPossible -> BLOCK_MUTATED (Matt Corallo)
6e55b292b0ea944897b6dc2f766446fd209af484 CorruptionPossible -> TX_WITNESS_MUTATED (Matt Corallo)
7df16e70e67c753c871797ce947ea09d7cb0e519 LookupBlockIndex -> CACHED_INVALID (Matt Corallo)
c8b0d22698385f91215ce8145631e3d5826dc977 [refactor] Drop redundant nDoS, corruptionPossible, SetCorruptionPossible (Matt Corallo)
34477ccd39a8d4bfa8ad612f22d5a46291922185 [refactor] Add useful-for-dos "reason" field to CValidationState (Matt Corallo)
6a7f8777a0b193fae4f976196f3464ffac01bf1b Ban all peers for all block script failures (Suhas Daftuar)
7b999103e21509e1c2dec10f68e48744ffe90f55 Clean up banning levels (Matt Corallo)
b8b4c80146780f9011abbd1be72343cc965c07b9 [refactor] drop IsInvalid(nDoSOut) (Matt Corallo)
8818729013e17c650a25f030b2b80e0997389155 [refactor] Refactor misbehavior ban decisions to MaybePunishNode() (Matt Corallo)
00e11e61c0211a62788611cd6a6714a393fdc26c [refactor] rename stateDummy -> orphan_state (Matt Corallo)
f34fa719cf33a51d11f1d2219cbe73ccff6fd697 Drop obsolete sigops comment (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This is a rebase of #11639 with some fixes for the last few comments which were not yet addressed.
The original PR text, with some strikethroughs of text that is no longer correct:
> This cleans up an old main-carryover - it made sense that main could decide what DoS scores to assign things because the DoS scores were handled in a different part of main, but now validation is telling net_processing what DoS scores to assign to different things, which is utter nonsense. Instead, we replace CValidationState's nDoS and CorruptionPossible with a general ValidationInvalidReason, which net_processing can handle as it sees fit. I keep the behavior changes here to a minimum, but in the future we can utilize these changes for other smarter behavior, such as disconnecting/preferring to rotate outbound peers based on them providing things which are invalid due to SOFT_FORK because we shouldn't ban for such cases.
>
> This is somewhat complementary with, though obviously conflicts heavily with #11523, which added enums in place of DoS scores, as well as a few other cleanups (which are still relevant).
>
> Compared with previous bans, the following changes are made:
>
> Txn with empty vin/vout or null prevouts move from 10 DoS
> points to 100.
> Loose transactions with a dependency loop now result in a ban
> instead of 10 DoS points.
> ~~BIP68-violation no longer results in a ban as it is SOFT_FORK.~~
> ~~Non-SegWit SigOp violation no longer results in a ban as it
> considers P2SH sigops and is thus SOFT_FORK.~~
> ~~Any script violation in a block no longer results in a ban as
> it may be the result of a SOFT_FORK. This should likely be
> fixed in the future by differentiating between them.~~
> Proof of work failure moves from 50 DoS points to a ban.
> Blocks with timestamps under MTP now result in a ban, blocks
> too far in the future continue to not result in a ban.
> Inclusion of non-final transactions in a block now results in a
> ban instead of 10 DoS points.
Note: The change to ban all peers for consensus violations is actually NOT the change I'd like to make -- I'd prefer to only ban outbound peers in those situations. The current behavior is a bit of a mess, however, and so in the interests of advancing this PR I tried to keep the changes to a minimum. I plan to revisit the behavior in a followup PR.
EDIT: One reviewer suggested I add some additional context for this PR:
> The goal of this work was to make net_processing aware of the actual reasons for validation failures, rather than just deal with opaque numbers instructing it to do something.
>
> In the future, I'd like to make it so that we use more context to decide how to punish a peer. One example is to differentiate inbound and outbound peer misbehaviors. Another potential example is if we'd treat RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE failures differently (ie after the next consensus change is implemented), and perhaps again we'd want to treat some peers differently than others.
ACKs for commit 0ff1c2:
jnewbery:
utACK 0ff1c2a838da9e8dc7f77609adc89124bbea3e2b
ryanofsky:
utACK 0ff1c2a838da9e8dc7f77609adc89124bbea3e2b. Only change is dropping the first commit (f3883a321bf4ab289edcd9754b12cae3a648b175), and dropping the temporary `assert(level == GetDoS())` that was in 35ee77f2832eaffce30042e00785c310c5540cdc (now c8b0d22698385f91215ce8145631e3d5826dc977)
Tree-SHA512: e915a411100876398af5463d0a885920e44d473467bb6af991ef2e8f2681db6c1209bb60f848bd154be72d460f039b5653df20a6840352c5f7ea5486d9f777a3
|
