| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
`list{transactions, sinceblock}` response
eb679a7896ce00e322972a011b023661766923b9 rpc: make `address` field optional (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
Close https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26338.
This PR makes optional the `address` field in the response of `listtransactions` and `listsinceblock` RPC.
And adds two tests that fail on master, but not on this branch.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK eb679a7896ce00e322972a011b023661766923b9
aureleoules:
ACK eb679a7896ce00e322972a011b023661766923b9
Tree-SHA512: b267439626e2ec3134ae790c849949a4c40ef0cebd20092e8187be3db0a61941b2da10bbbba92ca880b8369f46c1aaa806d057eaa5159325f65cbec7cb33c52f
|
|
|
|
we are already computing the preset inputs total amount inside `PreSelectedInputs::Insert`,
which internally decides whether to use the effective value or the raw output value based on
the 'subtract_fee_outputs' flag.
|
|
so if there is an error in any of the pre-set coins, we can fail right away
without computing the wallet available coins set (calling `AvailableCoins`)
which is a slow operation as it goes through the entire wallet's txes map.
----------------------
And to make the Coin Selection flow cleared, have decoupled SelectCoins in two functions:
1) AutomaticCoinSelection.
2) SelectCoins.
1) AutomaticCoinSelection:
Receives a set of coins and selects the best subset of them to
cover the target amount.
2) SelectCoins
In charge of select all the user manually selected coins first ("pre-set inputs"), and
if coin_control 'm_allow_other_inputs=true', call 'AutomaticCoinSelection' to select a
subset of coins owned by the wallet to cover for the target - preset_inputs.total_amount
remaining value.
|
|
First step towards decoupling the pre-selected-inputs fetching functionality
from `SelectCoins`. Which, will let us not waste resources calculating the
available coins if one of the pre-set inputs has an error.
(right now, if one of the pre-set inputs is invalid, we first walk through
the entire wallet txes map just to end up failing right after it finish)
|
|
No need to walk through the entire wallet's txes map just to get
coins that we could have gotten by just doing a simple map.find(out.hash).
(Which is what we are doing inside `SelectCoins` anyway)
|
|
no need to waste resources calculating the wallet available coins if
they are not going to be used.
The 'm_allow_other_inputs=true` default value change is to correct
an ugly misleading behavior:
The tx creation process was having a workaround patch to automatically
fall back to select coins from the wallet if `m_allow_other_inputs=false`
(previous default value) and no manual inputs were selected.
This could be seen in master in flows like `sendtoaddress`, `sendmany`
and even the GUI, where the `m_allow_other_inputs` value isn't customized
and the wallet still selects and adds coins to the tx internally.
|
|
for descriptor wallets
0582932260e7de4e8aba01d63e7c8a9ddb9c3685 test: add test for fast rescan using block filters (top-up detection) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ca48a4694f73e5be8f971ae482ebc2cce4caef44 rpc: doc: mention rescan speedup using `blockfilterindex=1` in affected wallet RPCs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
3449880b499d54bfbcf6caeed52851ce55259ed7 wallet: fast rescan: show log message for every non-skipped block (Sebastian Falbesoner)
935c6c4b234bbb0565cda6f58ee298048856acae wallet: take use of `FastWalletRescanFilter` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
70b35139040a2351c845a1cec1dafd2fbcd16e93 wallet: add `FastWalletRescanFilter` class for speeding up rescans (Sebastian Falbesoner)
c051026586fb269584bcba41de8a4a90280f5a7e wallet: add method for retrieving the end range for a ScriptPubKeyMan (Sebastian Falbesoner)
845279132b494f03b84d689c666fdcfad37f5a42 wallet: support fetching scriptPubKeys with minimum descriptor range index (Sebastian Falbesoner)
088e38d3bbea9694b319bc34e0d2e70d210c38b4 add chain interface methods for using BIP 157 block filters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
## Description
This PR is another take of using BIP 157 block filters (enabled by `-blockfilterindex=1`) for faster wallet rescans and is a modern revival of #15845. For reviewers new to this topic I can highly recommend to read the corresponding PR review club (https://bitcoincore.reviews/15845).
The basic idea is to skip blocks for deeper inspection (i.e. looking at every single tx for matches) if our block filter doesn't match any of the block's spent or created UTXOs are relevant for our wallet. Note that there can be false-positives (see https://bitcoincore.reviews/15845#l-199 for a PR review club discussion about false-positive rates), but no false-negatives, i.e. it is safe to skip blocks if the filter doesn't match; if the filter *does* match even though there are no wallet-relevant txs in the block, no harm is done, only a little more time is spent extra.
In contrast to #15845, this solution only supports descriptor wallets, which are way more widespread now than back in the time >3 years ago. With that approach, we don't have to ever derive the relevant scriptPubKeys ourselves from keys before populating the filter, and can instead shift the full responsibility to that to the `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan` which already takes care of that automatically. Compared to legacy wallets, the `IsMine` logic for descriptor wallets is as trivial as checking if a scriptPubKey is included in the ScriptPubKeyMan's set of scriptPubKeys (`m_map_script_pub_keys`): https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/e191fac4f3c37820f0618f72f0a8e8b524531ab8/src/wallet/scriptpubkeyman.cpp#L1703-L1710
One of the unaddressed issues of #15845 was that [the filter was only created once outside the loop](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15845#discussion_r343265997) and as such didn't take into account possible top-ups that have happened. This is solved here by keeping a state of ranged `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan`'s descriptor end ranges and check at each iteration whether that range has increased since last time. If yes, we update the filter with all scriptPubKeys that have been added since the last filter update with a range index equal or higher than the last end range. Note that finding new scriptPubKeys could be made more efficient than linearly iterating through the whole `m_script_pub_keys` map (e.g. by introducing a bidirectional map), but this would mean introducing additional complexity and state and it's probably not worth it at this time, considering that the performance gain is already significant.
Output scripts from non-ranged `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan`s (i.e. ones with a fixed set of output scripts that is never extended) are added only once when the filter is created first.
## Benchmark results
Obviously, the speed-up indirectly correlates with the wallet tx frequency in the scanned range: the more blocks contain wallet-related transactions, the less blocks can be skipped due to block filter detection.
In a [simple benchmark](https://github.com/theStack/bitcoin/blob/fast_rescan_functional_test_benchmark/test/functional/pr25957_benchmark.py), a regtest chain with 1008 blocks (corresponding to 1 week) is mined with 20000 scriptPubKeys contained (25 txs * 800 outputs) each. The blocks each have a weight of ~2500000 WUs and hence are about 62.5% full. A global constant `WALLET_TX_BLOCK_FREQUENCY` defines how often wallet-related txs are included in a block. The created descriptor wallet (default setting of `keypool=1000`, we have 8*1000 = 8000 scriptPubKeys at the start) is backuped via the `backupwallet` RPC before the mining starts and imported via `restorewallet` RPC after. The measured time for taking this import process (which involves a rescan) once with block filters (`-blockfilterindex=1`) and once without block filters (`-blockfilterindex=0`) yield the relevant result numbers for the benchmark.
The following table lists the results, sorted from worst-case (all blocks contain wallte-relevant txs, 0% can be skipped) to best-case (no blocks contain walltet-relevant txs, 100% can be skipped) where the frequencies have been picked arbitrarily:
wallet-related tx frequency; 1 tx per... | ratio of irrelevant blocks | w/o filters | with filters | speed gain
--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------|--------------|-------------
~ 10 minutes (every block) | 0% | 56.806s | 63.554s | ~0.9x
~ 20 minutes (every 2nd block) | 50% (1/2) | 58.896s | 36.076s | ~1.6x
~ 30 minutes (every 3rd block) | 66.67% (2/3) | 56.781s | 25.430s | ~2.2x
~ 1 hour (every 6th block) | 83.33% (5/6) | 58.193s | 15.786s | ~3.7x
~ 6 hours (every 36th block) | 97.22% (35/36) | 57.500s | 6.935s | ~8.3x
~ 1 day (every 144th block) | 99.31% (143/144) | 68.881s | 6.107s | ~11.3x
(no txs) | 100% | 58.529s | 5.630s | ~10.4x
Since even the (rather unrealistic) worst-case scenario of having wallet-related txs in _every_ block of the rescan range obviously doesn't take significantly longer, I'd argue it's reasonable to always take advantage of block filters if they are available and there's no need to provide an option for the user.
Feedback about the general approach (but also about details like naming, where I struggled a lot) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks fly out to furszy for discussing this subject and patiently answering basic question about descriptor wallets!
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0582932260e7de4e8aba01d63e7c8a9ddb9c3685
Sjors:
re-utACK 0582932260e7de4e8aba01d63e7c8a9ddb9c3685
aureleoules:
ACK 0582932260e7de4e8aba01d63e7c8a9ddb9c3685 - minor changes, documentation and updated test since last review
w0xlt:
re-ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25957/commits/0582932260e7de4e8aba01d63e7c8a9ddb9c3685
Tree-SHA512: 3289ba6e4572726e915d19f3e8b251d12a4cec8c96d041589956c484b5575e3708b14f6e1e121b05fe98aff1c8724de4564a5a9123f876967d33343cbef242e1
|
|
|
|
wallet RPCs
|
|
For that purpose, a new logging category BCLog::SCAN is introduced.
|
|
Can be reviewed with `--ignore-all-space`.
|
|
This only supports wallet descriptors right now.
|
|
|
|
This extra method will be needed for updating the filter set for
faster wallet rescans; after an internal top-up has happened, we only
want to add the newly created scriptPubKeys.
|
|
CWallet::m_next_resend
fa51cc965110e14661c848364a29c493287673be refactor: Use type-safe time point for CWallet::m_next_resend (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
`GetTime` is not type-safe, thus deprecated, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/75cbbfa279685f70d9f6fa71432df00862ffa865/src/util/time.h#L62-L70
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
Code Review ACK fa51cc965110e14661c848364a29c493287673be
aureleoules:
ACK fa51cc965110e14661c848364a29c493287673be
Tree-SHA512: 030de10070518580763ea75079442e2f934c54d3083be3ebe35e7f1bc6db2096745bb46d95aa1e6efe29ced30a048acfe5cd999178e6787b7647dfbec5ecb444
|
|
|
|
|
|
sendall should be using a bitwise AND for sendall's IsMine check rather
than an equality as IsMine will never return ISMINE_ALL.
|
|
|
|
Using `Mutex` provides stronger guarantee than `GlobalMutex` wrt Clang's
thread safety analysis. Thus it is better to reduce the usage of
`GlobalMutex` in favor of `Mutex`.
Using `Mutex` for `g_sqlite_mutex` is ok because its usage is limited in
`wallet/sqlite.cpp` and it does not require propagating the negative
annotations to not relevant code.
|
|
descriptor wallets
bfb9b94ebefdb95ac7656836975b3d5afc428744 wallet: remove duplicate descriptor type check in GetNewDestination (furszy)
76b982a4a5328c1357dbc5361317f682db160876 wallet: remove unused `nAccountingEntryNumber` field (furszy)
599ff5adfc7e1227c6d97d861d0715aee57611dd wallet: avoid double TopUp() calls on descriptor wallets (furszy)
Pull request description:
Found it while was digging over a `getnewaddress` timeout on the functional test suite.
### Context:
We are calling `TopUp()` twice in the following flows for descriptor wallets:
A) `CWallet::GetNewDestination`:
1) Calls spk_man->TopUp()
2) Calls spk_man->GetNewDestination() --> which, after the basic script checks, calls TopUp() again.
B) `CWallet::GetReservedDestination`:
1) Calls spk_man->TopUp()
2) Calls spk_man->GetReservedDestination() --> which calls to GetNewDestination (which calls to TopUp again).
### Changes:
Move `TopUp()` responsibility from the wallet class to each scriptpubkeyman.
So each spkm can decide to call it or not after perform the basic checks
for the new destination request.
Aside from that, remove the unused `nAccountingEntryNumber` wallet field. And a duplicated descriptor type check in `GetNewDestination`
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
re-ACK bfb9b94ebefdb95ac7656836975b3d5afc428744.
achow101:
ACK bfb9b94ebefdb95ac7656836975b3d5afc428744
theStack:
Code-review ACK bfb9b94ebefdb95ac7656836975b3d5afc428744
Tree-SHA512: 3ab73f37729e50d6c6a4434f676855bc1fb404619d63c03e5b06ce61c292c09c59d64cb1aa3bd9277b06f26988956991d62c90f9d835884f41ed500b43a12058
|
|
|
|
b01682a812f0841170657708ef0e896b904fcd77 refactor: revert m_next_resend to not be std::atomic (stickies-v)
9245f456705b285e2d9afcc01a6155e1b3f92fad wallet: only update m_next_resend when actually resending (stickies-v)
7fbde8af5c06694eecd4ce601109bd826a54bd6f refactor: carve out tx resend timer logic into ShouldResend (stickies-v)
01f3534632d18c772901fb6ce22f6394eae96799 refactor: remove unused locks for ResubmitWalletTransactions (stickies-v)
c6e8e11fb030ef406752761530421a9e2f0f5d4f wallet: fix capitalization in docstring (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
This PR addresses the outstanding comments/issues from #25768:
- capitalization [typo](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25768#discussion_r958572522) in docstring
- remove [unused locks](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/01f3534632d18c772901fb6ce22f6394eae96799) that we previously needed for `ReacceptWalletTransactions()`
- before #25768, only `ResendWalletTransactions()` would reset `m_next_resend` (formerly called `nNextResend`). By unifying it with `ReacceptWalletTransactions()` into `ResubmitWalletTransactions()`, the number of callsites that would reset the `m_next_resend` timer increased
- since `m_next_resend` is only used in case of `relay=true` (formerly `ResendWalletTransactions()`), this is unintuitive
- it leads to [unexpected behaviour](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25768#issuecomment-1252619427) such as transactions potentially never being rebroadcasted.
- it makes the ResubmitWalletTransactions()` logic [more complicated than strictly necessary](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25768#discussion_r962828563)
- since #25768, we relied on an earlier call of `ResubmitWalletTransactions(relay=false, force=true)` to initialize `m_next_resend()`, I think we can more elegantly do that by just providing `m_next_resend` with a default value
- just to highlight: this commit introduces behaviour change
Note: the `if (!fBroadcastTransactions)` in `CWallet:ShouldResend()` is duplicated on purpose, since it potentially avoids the slightly more expensive `if (!chain().isReadyToBroadcast())` check afterwards. I don't have a strong view on it, so happy to remove that additional check to reduce the diff, too.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK b01682a812f0841170657708ef0e896b904fcd77
achow101:
ACK b01682a812f0841170657708ef0e896b904fcd77
Tree-SHA512: ac5f1d8858f8dd736dd1480f385984d660c1916b62a42562317020e8f9fd6a30bd8f23d973d47e4c9480d744c5ba39fdbefd69568a5eb0589a8422d7e5971c1c
|
|
assumedvalid
1c36bafc5f7db268546dcc86c793071a7e9d35e0 wallet: have prune error take precedence over assumedvalid (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23997#discussion_r891412739.
From Russ Yanofsky:
> Agree with all of Marco's points here and think this should be updated
>
> If havePrune and hasAssumedValidChain are both true, better to show havePrune error message. Assumed-valid error message is vague and not very actionable. Would suggest "Error loading wallet. Wallet requires blocks to be downloaded, and software does not currently support loading wallets while blocks are being downloaded out of order though assumeutxo snapshots. Wallet should be able to load successfully after node sync reaches height {block_height}"
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 1c36bafc5f7db268546dcc86c793071a7e9d35e0
aureleoules:
ACK 1c36bafc5f7db268546dcc86c793071a7e9d35e0
Tree-SHA512: bfb0024bb962525cbbd392ade3c0331a8b0525e7f2f2ab52b2dbb9b6dd6311070d85ecb762a7689db84a30991971865698ab6fec187206e6a92133790c5a91dc
|
|
Fix comment typos:
sigature -> signature
ponter -> pointer
it's key -> its key
|
|
From Russ Yanofsky:
"Agree with all of Marco's points here and think this should be updated
If havePrune and hasAssumedValidChain are both true, better to show
havePrune error message. Assumed-valid error message is vague and not
very actionable. Would suggest "Error loading wallet. Wallet requires
blocks to be downloaded, and software does not currently support loading
wallets while blocks are being downloaded out of order though assumeutxo
snapshots. Wallet should be able to load successfully after node sync
reaches height {block_height}"
Co-authored-by: MacroFake <MarcoFalke@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Russ Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
|
|
|
|
checking target
d0d9cf7aea2ff36a14a19e6999400e4070b7b0c9 test: Check external coin effective value is used in CoinSelection (Aurèle Oulès)
76b79c1a177afa006184d716bd3d5b22ebadb168 wallet: Use correct effective value when checking target (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Fixes #26185. The following assert failed because it was not checked in the parent function.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/2bd9aa5a44b88c866c4d98f8a7bf7154049cba31/src/wallet/coinselection.cpp#L391
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK d0d9cf7aea2ff36a14a19e6999400e4070b7b0c9
furszy:
ACK d0d9cf7a
Tree-SHA512: e126daba1115e9d143f2a582c6953e7ea55e96853b6e819c7744fd7a23668f7d9854681d43ef55d8774655bc54e7e87c1c9fccd746d9e30fbf3caa82ef808ae9
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means we don't need datetime in a --disable-wallet build, and it
isn't included in the kernel.
|
|
Since m_next_resend is now only called from MaybeResendWalletTxs()
we don't have any potential race conditions anymore, so the usage
of std::atomic can be reverted.
|
|
We only want to relay our resubmitted transactions once every 12-36h.
By separating the timer update logic out of ResubmitWalletTransactions
and into MaybeResendWalletTxs we avoid non-relay calls (previously in
the separate ReacceptWalletTransactions function) from resetting that
timer.
|
|
Moves the logic of whether or not transactions should actually be
resent out of the function that's resending them. This reduces
responsibilities of ResubmitWalletTransactions and allows
carving out the updating of m_next_resend in a future commit.
|
|
initializers
fa2c72dda09f9b51332f6c7953ae81e573cc834f rpc: Set RPCArg options with designated initializers (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
For optional constructor arguments, use a new struct. This comes with two benefits:
* Earlier unused optional arguments can be omitted
* Designated initializers can be used
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK fa2c72dda09f9b51332f6c7953ae81e573cc834f
Tree-SHA512: 2a0619548187cc7437fee2466ac4780746490622f202659f53641be01bc2a1fea4416d1a77f3e963bf7c4cce62899b61fab0b9683440cf82f68be44f63826658
|
|
ReacceptWalletTransactions is replaced by ResubmitWalletTransactions
which already handles acquiring the necessary locks internally.
|
|
|
|
strings are sorted
810c3dc7efbfa07e81f161848010e886e04929ea doc, rpc: mention that `listdescriptors` result is sorted by string representation (Sebastian Falbesoner)
d99af861d034741649ccea396d825379e681670a test: check that `listdescriptors` descriptor strings are sorted (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This small PR adds a test for the change introduced in PR #25931 ("rpc: sort listdescriptors result", commit 50996241f2b0eefeaab4fcd11b9730fa2dc107ae). The correctness of the test can easily be verified by commenting out the `std::sort` call in the `listdescriptors` RPC implementation:
```diff
diff --git a/src/wallet/rpc/backup.cpp b/src/wallet/rpc/backup.cpp
index 09c74ea2da..3ed1a69b26 100644
--- a/src/wallet/rpc/backup.cpp
+++ b/src/wallet/rpc/backup.cpp
@@ -1829,9 +1829,11 @@ RPCHelpMan listdescriptors()
});
}
+ /*
std::sort(wallet_descriptors.begin(), wallet_descriptors.end(), [](const auto& a, const auto& b) {
return a.descriptor < b.descriptor;
});
+ */
UniValue descriptors(UniValue::VARR);
for (const WalletDescInfo& info : wallet_descriptors) {
```
leading to a fail of the functional test `wallet_listdescriptors.py`.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 810c3dc7efbfa07e81f161848010e886e04929ea
aureleoules:
ACK 810c3dc7efbfa07e81f161848010e886e04929ea
Tree-SHA512: 31770e3149b8a0251ecfa8662a2270c149f778eb910985f48a91d6a5d288b7b1c2244f9f1b798ebe3f1aa9f0b935cb4d6f12d5d28f78bcde3c4a61af76d11d0a
|
|
representation
|
|
a60d9eb9e6b6a272a3fca8981d89a55955dced55 Bugfix: Wallet: Lock cs_wallet for SignMessage (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
cs_desc_main is typically locked within scope of a cs_wallet lock, but:
CWallet::IsLocked locks cs_wallet
...called from DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan::GetKeys
...called from DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan::GetSigningProvider which locks cs_desc_main first, but has no access to cs_wallet ...called from DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan::SignMessage ...called from CWallet::SignMessage which can access and lock cs_wallet
Resolve the out of order locks by grabbing cs_wallet in CWallet::SignMessage first
-------------
Note this is currently only an issue for the GUI (which lacks sufficient testing apparently), but can be reproduced by #26082 (CI fails as a result)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a60d9eb9e6b6a272a3fca8981d89a55955dced55
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26130/commits/a60d9eb9e6b6a272a3fca8981d89a55955dced55
Tree-SHA512: 60f6959b0ceaf4d9339ba1a47154734034b637c41b1f9e26748a2dbbc3a2a95fc3696019103c55ae70c91d910ba8f3d7f4e27d263030eb60b689f290c4d82ea9
|
|
type acquisition
58b7df3caa21519de61e10f6ee42f0be9ac3cc30 wallet: AvailableCoins, simplify output script type acquisition (furszy)
Pull request description:
There is an unnecessary `ExtractDestination()` call and subsequent result parse into an `CScriptID`.
The `Solver()` call, which we are already doing below anyway, retrieves the script type and, in the P2SH case, the program id.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 58b7df3caa21519de61e10f6ee42f0be9ac3cc30
aureleoules:
re-ACK 58b7df3caa21519de61e10f6ee42f0be9ac3cc30
rajarshimaitra:
ACK 58b7df3caa21519de61e10f6ee42f0be9ac3cc30
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25933/commits/58b7df3caa21519de61e10f6ee42f0be9ac3cc30
Tree-SHA512: 51080766877c34cb2232ee3a1cb6b6a62b829c9297c67b99577742b94854a737a74d248015a4603ca9b6cd0a3c9e1d6d78673ff3cc9fc65dd82deea72dc537fd
|
|
RPC_TYPE_ERROR, not RPC_MISC_ERROR
e68d380797918e655decb76fc11725197d6d5323 rpc: remove unneeded RPCTypeCheckArgument checks (furszy)
55566630c60d23993a52ed54c95e7891f4588d57 rpc: treat univalue type check error as RPC_TYPE_ERROR, not RPC_MISC_ERROR (furszy)
Pull request description:
Same rationale as #26039, tackling another angle of the problem.
#### Context
We have the same univalue type error checking code spread/duplicated few times:
`RPCTypeCheckObj`, `RPCTypeCheckArgument`, `UniValue::checkType`.
In the first two functions, we are properly returning an `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` while in `UniValue::checkType`
we are throwing an `std::runtime_error` which is caught by the RPC server request handler, who invalidly
treats it as `RPC_MISC_ERROR` (which is a generic error return code that provides no information to the user).
#### Proposed Changes
Throw a custom exception from `Univalue::checkType` (instead of a plain
`std::runtime_error`) and catch it on the RPC server request handler.
So we properly return `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` (-3) on every arg type error and
not the general `RPC_MISC_ERROR` (-1).
This will allow us to remove all the `RPCTypeCheckArgument` calls. As them are redundant since #25629.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 4e4c41851fd4e2b01a2d8b94e71513f9831f810768ebd89684caca4901e87d3677980003949bcce441f9ca607a1b38a5894839b6c492f5947b8bab8cd9423ba6
|
|
ResubmitWalletTransactions
fad61573ed547615f73710cb59b2fb0ecafed127 Fix nNextResend data race in ResubmitWalletTransactions (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Now that `ResubmitWalletTransactions` is called from more than one thread, it is no longer thread-safe.
Introduced in 5291933fedceb9df16eb9e4627b1d7386b53ba07.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fad61573ed547615f73710cb59b2fb0ecafed127
jonatack:
ACK fad61573ed547615f73710cb59b2fb0ecafed127
stickies-v:
However, I think the current data race UB fix in fad61573e is the most critical to get into v24, so: ACK fad61573e - but open to further improvements.
Tree-SHA512: 54da2ed1c5f44e33588ac1d21ce26908fcf0bfe785c28ba8f6a479389b5ab7a0b32b016d4c482a2ccb405e0686efb61ffe23e427f5e589dc7d2b3c7469978977
|
|
locked wallet
2c03465dfa18ee615f76b6e507a65ef451ce1b7c test: Test watchonly imports with passphrase-locked wallet (Aurèle Oulès)
1fcf9e6e81ea8299fad958b32777c36b696090ac rpc: Allow importmulti watchonly imports with locked wallet (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Allows watch-only imports on locked wallets with `importmulti`.
Also adds a test.
Fixes #17867.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 2c03465dfa18ee615f76b6e507a65ef451ce1b7c
kristapsk:
re-ACK 2c03465dfa18ee615f76b6e507a65ef451ce1b7c
theStack:
re-ACK 2c03465dfa18ee615f76b6e507a65ef451ce1b7c
Tree-SHA512: 9978d6e59a230c0d160efd312c671cf59458797387d6622b6bf5c9e0681c1fcfebedb3d834fa9314dc5a1eda97e3295696352eacbeab9b43a46b942990087035
|
|
|
|
words and fix spelling
b6a65568dfbaf25839858b3114c28c07d8f9a45f Fix issues identified by codespell 2.2.1 and update ignored words (Jon Atack)
8f2010de6e7c232d540cc4a10516ae6ec98ebb22 Bump codespell version to 2.2.1 (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
as well as one in `test/lint/lint-locale-dependence.py` not seen by the spelling linter.
Can be tested locally by running `test/lint/lint-spelling.py` on this branch versus on master and by checking the CI linter result.
ACKs for top commit:
satsie:
ACK b6a65568dfbaf25839858b3114c28c07d8f9a45f
Tree-SHA512: ab4ba029a9a5de5926fa5d336bd3b21245acf0649c6aa69a48c223bd22327e13beb32e970f66f54db58cd318731b643e1c7ace9a89776ed2a069cddc02363b71
|
|
cs_desc_main is typically locked within scope of a cs_wallet lock, but:
CWallet::IsLocked locks cs_wallet
...called from DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan::GetKeys
...called from DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan::GetSigningProvider which locks cs_desc_main first, but has no access to cs_wallet
...called from DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan::SignMessage
...called from CWallet::SignMessage which can access and lock cs_wallet
Resolve the out of order locks by grabbing cs_wallet in CWallet::SignMessage first
|
|
in RestoreWallet, and in general via interfaces)
c3e536555aa3a7db773170671da1256a2ace2094 Bugfix: Wallet: Return util::Error rather than non-error nullptr when CreateWallet/LoadWallet/RestoreWallet fail (Luke Dashjr)
335ff98c8a64eda38a2a2334102bd253f108c253 Bugfix: Wallet: Wrap RestoreWallet content in a try block to ensure exceptions become returned errors and incomplete wallet directory is removed (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Bug 1: `copy_file` can throw exceptions, but `RestoreWallet` is expected to return a nullptr with a populated `errors` parameter. This is fixed by wrapping `copy_file` and `LoadWallet` (for good measure) in a `try` block, and converting any exceptions to the intended return style.
Bug 2: `util::Result` turns what would have been a `false` unique_ptr into a `true` nullptr result, which leads to nullptr dereferences in at least the 3 cases of wallet creation/loading/restoring. This is fixed by keeping the pointer as a plain `std::unique_ptr` until actually returning it (ie, after the nullptr check).
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/661
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c3e536555aa3a7db773170671da1256a2ace2094
Tree-SHA512: 4291b3dbbb147acea2e63a704324c9371bc16ecb4237f8753729b0b0a6e55c9758ad61bfe8bd432fd7b0bae95d8b63a9831e61ac8b8d5c0197b550a2e0f4a105
|
|
|
