| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
fac39c198324715565897f4240709340477af0bf wallet: document that tx in CreateTransaction is purely an out-param (MarcoFalke)
faac31521bb7ecbf999541cf918d3750ff589de4 Remove unused and confusing CTransaction constructor (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The constructor is confusing and dangerous (as explained in the TODO), fix that by removing it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fac39c198324715565897f4240709340477af0bf
promag:
Code review ACK fac39c198324715565897f4240709340477af0bf.
theStack:
Code review ACK fac39c198324715565897f4240709340477af0bf
Tree-SHA512: e0c8cffce8d8ee0166b8e1cbfe85ed0657611e26e2af0d69fde70eceaa5d75cbde3eb489af0428fe4fc431360b4c791fb1cc21b8dee7d4c7a4f17df00836229d
|
|
f3d870fc2271bf45e0269e5ae135bced1a26f620 wallet: List all wallets in non-SQLite or non-BDB builds (Russell Yanofsky)
d70dc89e78ee6355e0bc37cc36cfc04ef7a86885 refactor: Consolidate redundant wallet database path and exists functions (Russell Yanofsky)
6a7a63644cd2fc56538d323cc0d5c1d7945247fd refactor: Drop call to GetWalletEnv in wallet salvage code (Russell Yanofsky)
6ee9cbdd18a70894f89dd268c276d5eb47a34827 refactor: Replace ListWalletDir() function with ListDatabases() (Russell Yanofsky)
5aaeb6cf877055c47fa2bbd2ea5e8d3d2033933b MOVEONLY: Move IsBDBFile, IsSQLiteFile, and ListWalletDir (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR does not change behavior when bitcoin is built normally with both the SQLite and BDB libraries. It just makes non-SQLite and non-BDB builds more similar to the normal build. Specifically:
- It makes wallet directory lists always include all wallets so wallets don't appear missing depending on the build.
- It now triggers specific "Build does not support SQLite database format" and "Build does not support Berkeley DB database format" errors if a wallet can't be loaded instead of the more ambiguous and scary "Data is not in recognized format" error.
Both changes are implemented in the last commit. The previous commits are just refactoring cleanups that make the last commit possible and consolidate and reduce code.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f3d870fc2271bf45e0269e5ae135bced1a26f620
promag:
Tested ACK f3d870fc2271bf45e0269e5ae135bced1a26f620. Tested a --without-sqlite build with sqlite wallets.
Tree-SHA512: 029ad21559dbc338b5f351d05113c51bc25bce830f4f4e18bcd82287bc528275347a60249da65b91d252632aeb70b25d057bd59c704bfcaafb9f790bc5b59762
|
|
|
|
6fa72ceb8021c3b5aea62f6cfe92665c29212923 test: add coverage for passing fee rate as a string (Jon Atack)
ce207d6b93d35bc02fcd2dd28f1fd95869261d43 wallet, bugfix: allow send to take string fee rate values (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
RPC send currently only accepts fee rates as numbers, which is a user-facing bug. It should accept fee rates as an amount, e.g. a string or a number, as documented in its help and like sendtoaddress, sendmany, fundrawtransaction, walletcreatefundedpsbt, and bumpfee. Provide a fix and regression test coverage.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 6fa72ceb8021c3b5aea62f6cfe92665c29212923
achow101:
Code review ACK 6fa72ceb8021c3b5aea62f6cfe92665c29212923
promag:
Code review ACK 6fa72ceb8021c3b5aea62f6cfe92665c29212923.
Tree-SHA512: 735f9269cb1b81953764b5283449c0b154bd62de034225be5bcedc515c84faf767fe8fe0741008679fe412922c847b00d116cb11aab775236b779c847ba87167
|
|
These calls are no longer needed after edc316020e8270dafc5e31465d532baebdafd3dd
from #19098 which started instantiating BasicTestingSetup.m_node.chain
Patch from MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19425#discussion_r526701954
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suggested https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19425#discussion_r456236407
|
|
This just drops three interfaces::Chain methods replacing them with other calls.
Motivation for removing these chain methods:
- Need to get rid of findFirstBlockWithTimeAndHeight for #10102, which doesn't
support overloaded methods
- Followup from
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16426#discussion_r412487403
- phantomcircuit comments about findNextBlock test
http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-06-06.html#l-214
Behavior is not changing in any way here. A TODO comment in
ScanForWalletTransactions was removed, but just because it was invalid (see
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19195#discussion_r448020762), not
because it was implemented.
|
|
to const instead of ref to non-const
|
|
|
|
This commit does not change behavior when bitcoin is built normally with both
the SQLite and BDB libraries. It just makes non-SQLite and non-BDB builds
more similar to the normal build. Specifically:
- It makes wallet directory lists always include all wallets so wallets don't
appear missing depending on the build.
- It now triggers specific "Build does not support SQLite database format" and
"Build does not support Berkeley DB database format" errors if a wallet can't
be loaded instead of the more ambiguous and scary "Data is not in recognized
format" error.
|
|
No change in behavior. Just remove a little bit of code, reduce macro usage,
remove duplicative functions, and make BDB and SQLite implementations more
consistent with each other.
|
|
No observable change in behavior. This just avoids a redundant environment
lookup. Motivation is to be able to simplify the GetWalletEnv implementation in
an upcoming commit.
|
|
No change to behavior. This is just cleanup after previous MOVEONLY commit to
make db.h list function fit conventions of surrounding functions.
|
|
This commit does not change to any code and behavior. It it is easily reviewed
with the --color-moved=dimmed_zebra git diff option.
Motivation for this change is to:
- Consolidate redundant functions
IsBDBFile /ExistsBerkeleyDatabase / SplitWalletPath, and
IsSQLiteFile / ExistsSQLiteDatabase in the next commits
- Detect SQLite wallets consistently regardless whether bitcoin is built with
SQLite support in the next commits
- Avoid attempting to open SQLite databases with the BDB library when bitcoin
is built without SQLite support in the next commits
|
|
|
|
explicit usage
1e62350ca20898189904a88dfef9ea11ddcd8626 refactor: Improve use of explicit keyword (Fabian Jahr)
c502a6dbfb854ca827a5a3925394f9e09d29b898 lint: Use c++17 std in cppcheck linter (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
I found the `extended-lint-cppcheck` linter still uses `std=c++11` when reviewing #20471. The only difference in the output after this change is one line is missing:
```
src/script/descriptor.cpp:159:5: warning: Struct 'PubkeyProvider' has a constructor with 1 argument that is not explicit. [noExplicitConstructor]
```
After some digging, I am still not sure why this one is ignored with c++17 when 40 other`noExplicitConstructor` warnings were still appearing.
In the second commit, I fix these warnings, adding `explicit` where appropriate and adding fixes to ignore otherwise.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1e62350ca20898189904a88dfef9ea11ddcd8626: patch looks correct!
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 1e62350ca20898189904a88dfef9ea11ddcd8626
Tree-SHA512: dff7b324429a57160e217cf38d9ddbb6e70c6cb3d3e3e0bd4013d88e07afc2292c3df94d0acf7122e9d486322821682ecf15c8f2724a78667764c05d47f89a12
|
|
9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91 refactor: Assert before dereference in CWallet::GetDatabase (João Barbosa)
021feb3187b207d511561c1f0ffd7f9e5e0c9c1d refactor: Drop redudant CWallet::GetDBHandle (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK 9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91
meshcollider:
utACK 9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91. Changes since last review: rebasing due to conflict, dropping wallet path commit c6a5cd7a64c78b162f545a3467d0fea7dcaadfcc as suggested in discussion, making GetDatabase() const in the earlier commit. Giving more descriptive title like
Tree-SHA512: 68cf3b5e9fe0acb3a5cd081086629989f213f1904cc344e5775767b56759a7d905b1e1c303afbe40f172ff81bf07f3719b59d8f6ec2de3fdd53cd0e2d220fb25
|
|
|
|
629a9299b2a7241a3fa7d597cb34abcbe1af9255 Move WalletImpl from interfaces/wallet.cpp to wallet/interfaces.cpp (Russell Yanofsky)
2a26771d8161d30be1853a35acfee588cce03634 Move ChainImpl from interfaces/chain.cpp to node/interfaces.cpp (Russell Yanofsky)
12bd0fc9d70333c54c83ebb08c734272dbd330c2 Move NodeImpl from interfaces/node.cpp to node/interfaces.cpp (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
---
Move `NodeImpl` from `interfaces/node.cpp` to `node/interfaces.cpp`
Move `ChainImpl` from `interfaces/chain.cpp` to `node/interfaces.cpp`
Move `WalletImpl` from `interfaces/wallet.cpp` to `wallet/interfaces.cpp`
No changes to any classes (can review with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`)
Motivation for this change is to move node and wallet code to respective directories where it might fit in better than `src/interfaces/`, but also to remove all unnecessary code from `src/interfaces/` to unblock #19160 review, which has been hung up partially because of code organization. Building on top of this PR, #19160 should now be able to organize interface implementations more understandably in `src/node/` `src/wallet/` `src/ipc/` and `src/init/` directories instead of having so much functionality all in `src/interfaces/`
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 629a9299b2a7241a3fa7d597cb34abcbe1af9255.
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 629a9299b2a7241a3fa7d597cb34abcbe1af9255 🔺
Tree-SHA512: 87c2b8fd51519bbd4e5ad3539a79debcf88c3bf021eb28c63f3f555186538b62a0c4cc1a3f07cfb4ff13aea8b0b2fdde505d81f22a5e5fd12a6e375b55a92ab8
|
|
matching RPC endpoint wallet
89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Allow specifying wallet_name param matching RPC endpoint (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Allow specifying the `wallet_name` param to `unloadwallet` on RPC wallet endpoints, so long as it matches the endpoint wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d
Tree-SHA512: efb399c33f7b5596870a26a8680f453ca47aa7a6db4e550f9435d13044f1c4bad0ae11e8f0205213409d08b75c4188c3be782e54aafab1f65b97eb8cf5c252a9
|
|
3eb6f8b2e61c24a22ea9396d86672307845f35eb wallet (not for backport): improve upgradewallet error messages (Jon Atack)
ca8cd893bb56bf5d455154b0498b1f58f77d20ed wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet error responses (Jon Atack)
99d56e357159c7154f69f28cb5587c5ca20d6594 wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet result responses (Jon Atack)
2498b04ce88696a3216fc38b7d393906b733e8b1 Don't upgrade to HD split if it is already supported (Andrew Chow)
c46c18b788cb0862aafbb116fd37936cbed6a431 wallet: refactor GetClosestWalletFeature() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This follows up on #18836 and #20282 to fix and improve the as-yet unreleased `upgradewallet` feature and also implement review follow-up in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18836#discussion_r519328607.
This PR fixes 4 upgradewallet issues:
- this bug: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20403#discussion_r526063920
- it returns nothing in the absence of an RPC error, which isn't reassuring for users
- it returns the same thing both in the case of a successful upgrade and when no upgrade took place
- the error message object is currently dead code
This PR fixes the above and provides:
...user feedback to not silently return without upgrading
```
{
"wallet_name": "disable private keys",
"previous_version": 169900,
"current_version": 169900,
"result": "Already at latest version. Wallet version unchanged."
}
```
...better feedback after successfully upgrading
```
{
"wallet_name": "watch-only",
"previous_version": 159900,
"current_version": 169900,
"result": "Wallet upgraded successfully from version 159900 to version 169900."
}
```
...helpful error responses
```
{
"wallet_name": "blank",
"previous_version": 169900,
"current_version": 169900,
"error": "Cannot downgrade wallet from version 169900 to version 159900. Wallet version unchanged."
}
{
"wallet_name": "blank",
"previous_version": 130000,
"current_version": 130000,
"error": "Cannot upgrade a non HD split wallet from version 130000 to version 169899 without upgrading to support pre-split keypool. Please use version 169900 or no version specified."
}
```
updated help:
```
upgradewallet ( version )
Upgrade the wallet. Upgrades to the latest version if no version number is specified.
New keys may be generated and a new wallet backup will need to be made.
Arguments:
1. version (numeric, optional, default=169900) The version number to upgrade to. Default is the latest wallet version.
Result:
{ (json object)
"wallet_name" : "str", (string) Name of wallet this operation was performed on
"previous_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet before this operation
"current_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet after this operation
"result" : "str", (string, optional) Description of result, if no error
"error" : "str" (string, optional) Error message (if there is one)
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3eb6f8b
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 3eb6f8b2e61c24a22ea9396d86672307845f35eb 🛡
Tree-SHA512: b767314069e26b5933b123acfea6aa40708507f504bdb22884da020a4ca1332af38a7072b061e36281533af9f4e236d94d3c129daf6fe5b55241127537038eed
|
|
fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d wallet: Do not treat default constructed types as None-type (MarcoFalke)
fac4e136fa3d0fab7fde900a6be921313e16e7a6 refactor: Change pointer to reference because it can not be null (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Equating `0==None` and `""==None` is confusing, unneeded and undocumented
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d
achow101:
ACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d
Sjors:
tACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d modulo `unset`
Tree-SHA512: c4c8d0ad80c6697621d356a9545caf28ca2facc82bb2fa8e70eceb52372d25f0685237c73688c4b01da0e75d213c77c0d45011a8bdfe81ea783d85f045786dac
|
|
|
|
request and wallet_name parameter specify a wallet
b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16 RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Clarify docs/error when both the RPC endpoint and wallet_name parameter specify a wallet (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Just documentation clarifications from #20448
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16
jonatack:
re-ACK b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16 per `git diff e8303a0 b1f59d5`
Tree-SHA512: ac068b0aa7ceed49496367fdd9425b59dbba18b56e89b26afc22a6c8ece51f0b92a169cacd55740b1cadab2b32f4f8e8700e609066ab7e59d3b53c7891da585e
|
|
endpoint
|
|
wallet_name parameter specify a wallet
|
|
d52f502b1ea1cafa7d58c5517f01dba26ecb7269 Fix mock SQLiteDatabases (Andrew Chow)
99309ab3e96a290359b84f9b657c5115aa3470dd Allow disabling BDB in configure with --without-bdb (Andrew Chow)
ee47f11f7399ec3a4330ea1f2fc388c7e32959d6 GUI: Force descriptor wallets when BDB is not compiled (Andrew Chow)
71e40b33bd1e72ccf5d82e1d3f8b481f8e965492 RPC: Require descriptors=True for createwallet when BDB is not compiled (Andrew Chow)
6ebc41bf9cb0184554923e84e1935195d356f2b3 Enforce salvage is only for BDB wallets (Andrew Chow)
a58b719cf75e2d97205ec260bcff0d4780fe4fb8 Do not compile BDB things when USE_BDB is defined (Andrew Chow)
b33af48210c117a734fc3e1bebeb1c2057645775 Include wallet/bdb.h where it is actually being used (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds a `--without-bdb` option to `configure` which disables the compilation of the BDB stuff. Legacy wallets will not be created when BDB is not compiled. A legacy-sqlite wallet can be loaded, but we will not create them.
Based on #20156 to resolve the situation where both `--without-sqlite` and `--without-bdb` are provided. In that case, the wallet is disabled and `--disable-wallet` is effectively set.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK d52f502b1ea1cafa7d58c5517f01dba26ecb7269
Tree-SHA512: 5a92ba7a542acc2e27003e9d4e5940e0d02d5c1f110db06cdcab831372bfd83e8d89c269caff31dd5bff062c1cf5f04683becff12bd23a33be731676f346553d
|
|
and remove redundant units ("Must be at least 1.000 sat/vB sat/vB" -> "1.00 sat vB")
|
|
A check to raise an error on zero-fee txns was mistakenly extended in commit
a0d4957 from the bumpfee and send{toaddress, many} RPCs to also include
fundrawtransaction and walletcreatefundedpsbt.
This commit overrides zero fee rate checking for these two RPCs, not only for
the feeRate (BTC/kvB) arg to return to previous behavior, but also for the new
fee_rate (sat/vB) arg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7486e2771e7b5d6fa84df6e954be76350c84e220 Tests: Unit test related to WalletDB ReadKeyValue (Bushstar)
32def8d1c29e0855fe5429687acabd2f29119316 Catch ios_base::failure specifically (Peter Bushnell)
Pull request description:
In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2950 a hash of the pubkey and private was added to speed up key import, this was made backwards compatible by reading the hash in a try block with an ellipses catch all in case the hash was not present.
CDataStream::read() specifically throws std::ios_base::failure, backwards compatibility expects only that error to be thrown, if something else gets thrown we should not be catching it. The change in this commit is to catch that exception only. If any other exception is thrown other than std::ios_base::failure it will be caught by the wider try block and an error written to the log and/or console.
CDataStream::read() throwing std::ios_base::failure.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/2c364fde423e74b4e03ebcff4582a9db7a6c4e4b/src/streams.h#L191
Wider catch statements that pick up all others exceptions other than ios_base::failure.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/2c364fde423e74b4e03ebcff4582a9db7a6c4e4b/src/wallet/walletdb.cpp#L425
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/2c364fde423e74b4e03ebcff4582a9db7a6c4e4b/src/wallet/walletdb.cpp#L430
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7486e2771e7b5d6fa84df6e954be76350c84e220
Tree-SHA512: 5364bf935af8ec603bf5b8fef8c23b5cdaa4fe3506090cff988413221f2eaa99f7a91929afb42a35f8881ce2328744a0d32052da51ca0a5b2e65b6809e97f604
|
|
It is unnecessary to upgrade to FEATURE_HD_SPLIT if this feature is
already supported by the wallet. Because upgrading to FEATURE_HD_SPLIT
actually requires upgrading to FEATURE_PRE_SPLIT_KEYPOOL, users would
accidentally be upgraded to FEATURE_PRE_SPLIT_KEYPOOL instead of nothing
being done.
Fixes the issue described at
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20403#discussion_r526063920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b wallet: override minfee checks (fOverrideFeeRate) for fee_rate (Jon Atack)
9a670b4f07a6140de809d73cbd7f3e614eb6ea74 wallet: update sendtoaddress, send RPC examples with fee_rate (Jon Atack)
be481b72e24fb6834bd674cd8daee67c6938b42d wallet: use MIN_RELAY_TX_FEE in bumpfee help (Jon Atack)
449b730579566459e350703611629e63e54657ed wallet: provide valid values if invalid estimate mode passed (Jon Atack)
6da3afbaee5809ebf6d88efaa3958c505c2d71c7 wallet: update remaining rpcwallet fee rate units to BTC/kvB (Jon Atack)
173b5b5fe07d45be5a1e5bc7a5df996f20ab1e85 wallet: update fee rate units, use sat/vB for fee_rate error messages (Jon Atack)
7f9835a05abf3e168ad93e7195cbaa4bf61b9b07 wallet: remove fee rates from conf_target helps (Jon Atack)
b7994c01e9a3251536fe6538a22f614774eec82d wallet: add fee_rate unit warnings to bumpfee (Jon Atack)
410e471fa42d3db04e8879c71f8c824dcc151a83 wallet: remove redundant bumpfee fee_rate checks (Jon Atack)
a0d495747320c79b27a83c216dcc526ac8df8f24 wallet: introduce fee_rate (sat/vB) param/option (Jon Atack)
e21212f01b7c41eba13b0479b252053cf482bc1f wallet: remove unneeded WALLET_BTC_KB_TO_SAT_B constant (Jon Atack)
6112cf20d43b0be34fe0edce2ac3e6b27cae1bbe wallet: add CFeeRate ctor doxygen documentation (Jon Atack)
3f7279161347543ce4e997d78ea89a4043491145 wallet: fix bug in RPC send options (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #11413 and #20220 to address #19543.
- replace overloading the conf_target and estimate_mode params with `fee_rate` in sat/vB in the sendtoaddress, sendmany, send, fundrawtransaction, walletcreatefundedpsbt, and bumpfee RPCs
- allow non-actionable conf_target value of `0` and estimate_mode value of `""` to be passed to use `fee_rate` as a positional argument, in addition to as a named argument
- fix a bug in the experimental send RPC described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20220#discussion_r513789526 where args were not being passed correctly into the options values
- update the feerate error message units for these RPCs from BTC/kB to sat/vB
- update the test coverage, help docs, doxygen docs, and some of the RPC examples
- other changes to address the excellent review feedback
See this wallet meeting log for more context: http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-11-06.html#l-309
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 05e82d8
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 05e82d86b0 did not test and found a few style nits, which can be fixed later 🍯
Xekyo:
tACK 05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b
Sjors:
utACK 05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b
Tree-SHA512: a4ee5f184ada53f1840b2923d25873bda88c5a2ae48e67eeea2417a0b35154798cfdb3c147b05dd56bd6608a784e1b91623bb985ee2ab9ef2baaec22206d0a9c
|
|
963696288955dc31b3a4fd136bfb791a9d99755b [upgradewallet] removed unused warning param (Sishir Giri)
Pull request description:
The `warning` variable was unused in `upgradewallet` so I removed it
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 963696288955dc31b3a4fd136bfb791a9d99755b: diff looks correct
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 963696288955dc31b3a4fd136bfb791a9d99755b
jonatack:
ACK 963696288955dc31b3a4fd136bfb791a9d99755b
Tree-SHA512: 1d63186ce1e05e86a778340f2d7986c2cee1523de0a11cea39e8d148ac7ee26c49741dfa302b5c1cd1c8d74e67c1f9baee2763720c2d850b57da9a3fdce24565
|
|
|
|
5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab wallet: Remove -upgradewallet from dummywallet (MarcoFalke)
a314271f08215feba53ead27096ac7fda34acb3c test: Remove unused wallet.dat (MarcoFalke)
bf7635963c03203e7189ddaa56c6b086a0108cbf tests: Test specific upgradewallet scenarios and that upgrades work (Andrew Chow)
4b418a9decc3e855ee4b0bbf9e61121c8e9904e5 test: Add test_framework/bdb.py module for inspecting bdb files (Andrew Chow)
092fc434854f881330771a93a1280ac67b1d3549 tests: Add a sha256sum_file function to util (Andrew Chow)
0bd995aa19be65b0dd23df1df571c71428c2bc32 wallet: upgrade the CHDChain version number when upgrading to split hd (Andrew Chow)
8e32e1c41c995e832e643f605d35a7aa112837e6 wallet: remove nWalletMaxVersion (Andrew Chow)
bd7398cc6258c258e9f4411c50630ec4a552341b wallet: have ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade check against the new version (Andrew Chow)
5f720544f34dedf75b063b962845fa8eca604514 wallet: Add GetClosestWalletFeature function (Andrew Chow)
842ae3842df489f1b8d68e67a234788966218184 wallet: Add utility method for CanSupportFeature (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR cleans up the wallet upgrade mechanism a bit, fixes some probably bugs, and adds more test cases.
The `nWalletMaxVersion` member variable has been removed as it made `CanSupportFeature` unintuitive and was causing a couple of bugs. The reason this was introduced originally was to allow a wallet upgrade to only occur when the new feature is first used. While this makes sense for the old `-upgradewallet` option, for an RPC, this does not quite make sense. It's more intuitive for an upgrade to occur if possible if the `upgradewallet` RPC is used as that's an explicit request to upgrade a particular wallet to a newer version. `nWalletMaxVersion` was only relevant for upgrades to `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` and `FEATURE_COMPRPUBKEY` both of which are incredibly old features. So for such wallets, the behavior of `upgradewallet` will be that the feature is enabled immediately without the wallet needing to be encrypted at that time (note that `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` indicates support for encryption, not that the wallet is encrypted) or for a new key to be generated.
`CanSupportFeature` would previously indicate whether we could upgrade to `nWalletMaxVersion` not just whether the current wallet version supported a feature. While this property was being used to determine whether we should upgrade to HD and HD chain split, it was also causing a few bugs. Determining whether we should upgrade to HD or HD chain split is resolved by passing into `ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade` the version we are upgrading to and checking against that. By removing `nWalletMaxVersion` we also fix a bug where you could upgrade to HD chain split without the pre-split keypool.
`nWalletMaxVersion` was also the version that was being reported by `getwalletinfo` which meant that the version reported was not always consistent across restarts as it depended on whether `upgradewallet` was used. Additionally to make the wallet versions consistent with actually supported versions, instead of just setting the wallet version to whatever is given to `upgradewallet`, we normalize the version number to the closest supported version number. For example, if given 150000, we would store and report 139900.
Another bug where CHDChain was not being upgraded to the version supporting HD chain split is also fixed by this PR.
Lastly several more tests have been added. Some refactoring to the test was made to make these tests easier. These tests check specific upgrading scenarios, such as from non-HD (version 60000) to HD to pre-split keypool. Although not specifically related to `upgradewallet`, `UpgradeKeyMetadata` is now being tested too.
Part of the new tests is checking that the wallet files are identical before and after failed upgrades. To facilitate this, a utility function `sha256sum_file` has been added. Another part of the tests is to examine the wallet file itself to ensure that the records in the wallet.dat file have been correctly modified. So a new `bdb.py` module has been added to deserialize the BDB db of the wallet.dat file. This format isn't explicitly documented anywhere, but the code and comments in BDB's source code in file `dbinc/db_page.h` describe it. This module just dumps all of the fields into a dict.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
approach ACK 5f9c0b6360
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab
jonatack:
ACK 5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab, approach seems fine, code review, only skimmed the test changes but they look well done, rebased on current master, debug built and verified the `wallet_upgradewallet.py` test runs green both before and after running `test/get_previous_releases.py -b v0.19.1 v0.18.1 v0.17.2 v0.16.3 v0.15.2`
Tree-SHA512: 7c4ebf420850d596a586cb6dd7f2ef39c6477847d12d105fcd362abb07f2a8aa4f7afc5bfd36cbc8b8c72fcdd1de8d2d3f16ad8e8ba736b6f4f31f133fe5feba
|
|
|
|
|
