Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
d69045e291e32e02d105d1b5ff1c8b86db0ae69e test: add coverage for 'listreceivedbyaddress' no change addrs return (furszy)
324f00a6420bbd64c67c264e50632e6fa36ae732 refactor: 'ListReceived' use optional for filtered address (furszy)
b459fc122feace9e9a738c48aab21961cf15dddc refactor: RPC 'ListReceived', encapsulate m_address_book access (furszy)
fa9f2ab8fd53075d2a3ec93ddac4908e73525c46 refactor: RPC 'listlabels', encapsulate 'CWallet::ListAddrBookLabels' functionality (furszy)
83e42c4b94e376a19d3eb0a2379769b8b8ac5fc8 refactor: use 'ForEachAddrBookEntry' in RPC 'getaddressesbylabel' (furszy)
2b48642499016cb357e4bcec32481cd50361194e refactor: use ForEachAddrBookEntry in interfaces::getAddresses (furszy)
032842ae4196aaed5ea3567ea01a61ed75ab2edd wallet: implement ForEachAddrBookEntry method (furszy)
09649bc95d5f2855a54a8cf02e65215a3b333c92 refactor: implement general 'ListAddrBookAddresses' for addressbook destinations lookup (furszy)
192eb1e61c3c43baec7f32c498ab0ce0656a58f7 refactor: getAddress don't access m_address_book, use FindAddressEntry function (furszy)
Pull request description:
### Context
The wallet's `m_address_book` field is being accessed directly from several places across the sources.
### Problem
Code structure wise, we shouldn't be accessing it directly. It could end up being modified by mistake (from a place that has nothing to do with the wallet like an RPC command or the GUI) and cause a bigger issue: like an address book entry 'purpose' string change, which if done badly (from 'send' to 'receive'), could end up in a user sharing a "receive" address that he/she doesn't own.
### Solution
Encapsulate `m_address_book` access inside the wallet.
-------------------------------------------------------
Extra Note:
This is the initial step towards decoupling the address book functionality from the wallet's sources. In other words, the creation of the `AddressBookManager` (which will be coming in a follow-up PR).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d69045e291e32e02d105d1b5ff1c8b86db0ae69e
theStack:
ACK d69045e291e32e02d105d1b5ff1c8b86db0ae69e ✅
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25337/commits/d69045e291e32e02d105d1b5ff1c8b86db0ae69e
Tree-SHA512: dba17acd86f171b4e9af0223bbbcad380048570f6a2f6a92732a51f01abe8806debaf65c9e9e5569fa76a541903cbb50adcb5f56ef77858151c698ae6b218e2a
|
|
|
|
Instead of duplicate the exact same code twice.
|
|
subtracting fees from output
140d942634f9f1bba191aafa948df57812c0f3fe wallet: don't add change fee to target if subtracting fees from output (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Change fee is payed by the recipient, so we don't need to add it to our target for coin selection.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 140d942634f9f1bba191aafa948df57812c0f3fe
ishaanam:
ACK 140d942634f9f1bba191aafa948df57812c0f3fe
furszy:
Code review ACK 140d9426
Tree-SHA512: b5efd0264c47ecee9204a3fd039bad24c69f9e614c6e1d9bb240ee5be6356b175aa074f3be123e6cfb8becd4d7bd1028eebe18801662cc69d19413d8d5a9dd5c
|
|
Instead of calling GetCachableAmount twice, which will result in
iterating through all the transaction txins/txouts and calling
GetDebit/GetCredit (which lock cs_wallet), just merge the filters and do
it once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
co-authored-by: Fabian Jahr <fjahr@protonmail.com>
|
|
co-authored-by: Fabian Jahr <fjahr@protonmail.com>
|
|
|
|
'WalletBatch' is created
c318211ddd48d44dd81dded553afeee3bc41c89e walletdb: fix last client version update (furszy)
bda8ebe608e6572eaaf40cd28dab6954241c9b0d wallet: don't read db every time that a new WalletBatch is created (furszy)
Pull request description:
Found it while was working on #25297.
We are performing a db read operation every time that a new `WalletBatch` is created, inside the constructor, just to check if the client version field is inside the db or not.
As the client version field does not change in the entire db lifecycle, this operation can be done only once: The first time that the db is accessed/opened and the client version value can be cached.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c318211ddd48d44dd81dded553afeee3bc41c89e
w0xlt:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25383/commits/c318211ddd48d44dd81dded553afeee3bc41c89e
Tree-SHA512: 7fb780c656e169e8eb21e7212242494a647f6506d6da2cca828703713d440d29c82bec9e7d2c410f37b49361226ccd80846d3eeb8168383d0c2a11d85d73bee2
|
|
|
|
25e4762ae7a09906020e62cd947e9f71300439cf wallet: more accurate tx_noinputs_size (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Rationale: more accurate non-input fee estimation for txs with >=253 inputs
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK 25e4762ae7a09906020e62cd947e9f71300439cf
achow101:
ACK 25e4762ae7a09906020e62cd947e9f71300439cf
furszy:
Code review ACK 25e4762a. left a small nit.
Tree-SHA512: bda8fad725d32ad3e13c007fa56ddb6679ac1a32098ddb08d9a114054acfa681cb66cd703ac675297f731cb381b09067a99a4efa31320140bbdd03f0cfdc81af
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 9b5950db8683f9b4be03f79ee0aae8a780b01a4b.
Waste can be negative. At feerates lower than long_term_feerate this
means that a waste of 0 may be a suboptimal solution and this causes the
search to exit prematurely.
Only when the feerate is equal to the long_term_feerate would achieving
a waste of 0 indicate that we have achieved an optimal solution,
because it would mean that the excess is 0. It seems unlikely
that this would ever occur outside of test cases, and even then we
should prefer solutions with more inputs over solutions with fewer
according to previous decisions—but solutions with more inputs are found
later in the branch exploration.
The "optimization" described in #18257 and implemented in #18262 is
therefore a premature exit on a suboptimal solution and should be reverted.
|
|
e673d8b475995075b696208386c9e45ae7ca3e20 bench: Enable loading benchmarks depending on what's compiled (Andrew Chow)
4af3547ebac672a2d516e8696fd3580a766c27eb bench: Use mock wallet database for wallet loading benchmark (Andrew Chow)
49910f255f77e14fccf189353d188efac00d1445 sqlite: Use in-memory db instead of temp for mockdb (Andrew Chow)
a1080802f8d7c3d1251ec6f2be33031f568deafa walletdb: Create a mock database of specific type (Andrew Chow)
7c0d34476df446e3825198b27c6f62bba4c0b974 bench: reduce the number of txs in wallet for wallet loading bench (Andrew Chow)
f85b54ed27bd6eddb1e7035db02d542575b3ab24 bench: Add transactions directly instead of mining blocks (Andrew Chow)
d94244c4bf37365272a16eb2ce6517605b4c8a47 bench: reduce number of epochs for wallet loading benchmark (Andrew Chow)
817c051364208d3f9e7e2af5700bd2bee5c9f303 bench: use unsafesqlitesync in wallet loading benchmark (Andrew Chow)
9e404a98312d73c969adf4f8e87aad1ac4b3029d bench: Remove minEpochIterations from wallet loading benchmark (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`minEpochIterations` is probably unnecessary to set, so removing it makes the runtime much faster.
ACKs for top commit:
Rspigler:
tACK e673d8b475995075b696208386c9e45ae7ca3e20
furszy:
Code review ACK e673d8b4, nice PR.
glozow:
Concept ACK e673d8b475995075b696208386c9e45ae7ca3e20. For each commit, verified that there was a performance improvement without negating the purpose of the bench, and made some effort to verify that the code is correct.
Tree-SHA512: 9337352ef846cf18642d5c14546c5abc1674b4975adb5dc961a1a276ca91f046b83b7a5e27ea6cd26264b96ae71151e14055579baf36afae7692ef4029800877
|
|
|
|
|
|
When filling a PSBT, we search the listed pubkeys in order to determine
whether the current DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan could sign the transaction
even if it is not watching the scripts. With Taproot, the taproot
pubkeys need to be searched as well.
|
|
If all inputs are segwit v1+, the non_witness_utxos can be removed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, the wallet scan progress is not saved.
If it is interrupted, it will be necessary to start from
scratch on the next load.
With this change, progress is saved every 60 seconds.
Co-authored-by: furszy <matiasfurszyfer@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
|
|
Plus remove open bracket jump line
|
|
|
|
functionality
Mainly to not access 'm_address_book' externally.
|
|
32e5edc0f454c59c8e0d8d86a9abfa9a3f25ca28 wallet: avoid extra wtx lookup in AddToSpends (furszy)
Pull request description:
As `AddToSpends` is only called from `AddToWallet` and `LoadToWallet`, places where we insert the wtx into the wallet map, we can directly feed `AddToSpends` with the `wtx` and remove another extra lookup.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 32e5edc0f454c59c8e0d8d86a9abfa9a3f25ca28
achow101:
ACK 32e5edc0f454c59c8e0d8d86a9abfa9a3f25ca28
theStack:
Code-review ACK 32e5edc0f454c59c8e0d8d86a9abfa9a3f25ca28
w0xlt:
Code Review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25427/commits/32e5edc0f454c59c8e0d8d86a9abfa9a3f25ca28
brunoerg:
crACK 32e5edc0f454c59c8e0d8d86a9abfa9a3f25ca28
Tree-SHA512: e9fb8df44c3e3fa26c107d261bf78e45014b4755890a64817f2be62ee6b7751f5dd2813a18dcb103a21ddba1422f9d2d59c4bf186f08314e634365d36b01be8f
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
destinations lookup
|
|
This method is only called from AddToWallet and LoadToWallet,
places where we already have the wtx.
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/fAllowOtherInputs/m_allow_other_inputs/g' -- $(git grep --files-with-matches 'fAllowOtherInputs')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
|
|
Otherwise, RPC commands such as `walletcreatefundedpsbt` will not support the manual selection of locked, spent and externally added coins.
Full explanation is inside #25118 comments but brief summary is:
`vCoins` at `SelectCoins` time could not be containing the manually selected input because, even when they were selected by the user, the current `AvailableCoins` flow skips locked and spent coins.
Extra note: this is an intermediate step to unify the `fAllowOtherInputs`/`m_add_inputs` concepts. It will not be a problem anymore in the future when we finally decouple the wtx-outputs lookup process from `SelectCoins` and don't skip the user's manually selected coins in `AvailableCoins`.
|
|
Seeking to make the `CoinControl` option less confusing/redundant.
In #16377 the `CoinControl` flag ‘m_add_inputs’ was added to tell the coin filtering and selection process two things:
- Coin Filtering: Only use the provided inputs. Skip the Rest.
- Coin Selection: Search the wtxs-outputs and append all the `CoinControl` selected outpoints to the selection result (skipping all the available output checks). Nothing else.
Meanwhile, in `CoinControl` we already have a flag ‘fAllowOtherInputs’ which is already saying:
- Coin Filtering: Only use the provided inputs. Skip the Rest.
- Coin Selection: If false, no selection process -> append all the `CoinControl` selected outpoints to the selection result (while they passed all the `AvailableCoins` checks and are available in the 'vCoins' vector).
As can notice, the first point in the coin filtering process is duplicated in the two option flags. And the second one, is slightly different merely because it takes into account whether the coin is on the `AvailableCoins` vector or not.
So it makes sense to merge ‘m_add_inputs’ and ‘fAllowOtherInputs’ into a single field for the coin filtering process while introduce other changes to add the missing/skipped coins into 'vCoins' vector if they were manually selected by the user (follow-up commits).
|
|
parameter name"
Happened because the "feerate=" comment was after the comma.
|
|
'AvailableCoins' + several code cleanups.
fd5c996d1609e6f88769f6f3ef0c322e3435b3aa wallet: GetAvailableBalance, remove double walk-through every available coin (furszy)
162d4ad10f28c5fa38551d69ce9b296ab3933c77 wallet: add 'only_spendable' filter to AvailableCoins (furszy)
cdf185ccfb2085e5a4bf82d833392d74b748aeff wallet: remove unused IsSpentKey(hash, index) method (furszy)
4b83bf8dbcf6b8b1c1293575391e90ac7e21b0e0 wallet: avoid extra IsSpentKey -> GetWalletTx lookups (furszy)
3d8a2822570e3cf4d1bc4f9d59b5dcb0145920ad wallet: decouple IsSpentKey(scriptPubKey) from IsSpentKey(hash, n) (furszy)
a06fa94ff81e2bccef0316ea5ec4eca0f4de5071 wallet: IsSpent, 'COutPoint' arg instead of (hash, index) (furszy)
91902b77202fc636edb3db587cb6e87d9fb9b60a wallet: IsLockedCoin, 'COutPoint' arg instead of (hash, index) (furszy)
9472ca0a65396206b3078bddf98f4c1807be2d82 wallet: AvailableCoins, don't call 'wtx.tx->vout[i]' multiple times (furszy)
4ce235ef8f9a9dddc52d7ab60c8f71bda1d38873 wallet: return 'CoinsResult' struct in `AvailableCoins` (furszy)
Pull request description:
This started in #24845 but grew out of scope of it.
So, points tackled:
1) Avoid extra `GetWalletTx` lookups inside `AvailableCoins -> IsSpentKey`.
`IsSpentKey` was receiving the tx hash and index to internally lookup the tx inside the wallet's map. As all the `IsSpentKey` function callers already have the wtx available, them can provide the `scriptPubKey` directly.
2) Most of the time, we call `Wallet::AvailableCoins`, and later on the process, skip the non-spendable coins from the result in subsequent for-loops. So to speedup the process: introduced the ability to filter by "only_spendable" coins inside `Wallet::AvailableCoins` directly.
(the non-spendable coins skip examples are inside `AttemptSelection->GroupOutputs` and `GetAvailableBalance`).
4) Refactored `AvailableCoins` in several ways:
a) Now it will return a new struct `CoinsResult` instead of receiving the vCoins vector reference (which was being cleared at the beginning of the method anyway). --> this is coming from #24845 but cherry-picked it here too to make the following commits look nicer.
b) Unified all the 'wtx.tx->vout[I]' calls into a single call (coming from this comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24699#discussion_r854163032).
5) The wallet `IsLockedCoin` and `IsSpent` methods now accept an `OutPoint` instead of a hash:index. Which let me cleanup a bunch of extra code.
6) Speeded up the wallet 'GetAvailableBalance': filtering `AvailableCoins` by spendable outputs only and using the 'AvailableCoins' retrieved `total_amount` instead of looping over all the retrieved coins once more.
-------------------------------------------------------
Side topic, all this process will look even nicer with #25218
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fd5c996d1609e6f88769f6f3ef0c322e3435b3aa
brunoerg:
crACK fd5c996d1609e6f88769f6f3ef0c322e3435b3aa
w0xlt:
Code Review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25005/commits/fd5c996d1609e6f88769f6f3ef0c322e3435b3aa
Tree-SHA512: 376a85476f907f4f7d1fc3de74b3dbe159b8cc24687374d8739711ad202ea07a33e86f4e66dece836da3ae6985147119fe584f6e672f11d0450ba6bd165b3220
|
|
The value was only being updated launching releases with higher version numbers
and not if the user launched a previous release.
Co-authored-by: MacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com>
|
|
7832e9438f5c66b88f60676d14e1e11d669eb109 test: fundrawtransaction preset input weight calculation (S3RK)
c3981e379fa088aa7aa03b2f505342a5b3bc3436 wallet: do not count wallet utxos as external (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Correctly differentiating between external vs non-external utxos in coin control produces more accurate weight and fee estimations.
Weight for external utxos is estimated based on the maximum signature size, while for the wallet utxos we expect minimal signature due to signature grinding.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 7832e9438f5c66b88f60676d14e1e11d669eb109
Xekyo:
re-ACK 7832e9438f5c66b88f60676d14e1e11d669eb109
furszy:
ACK 7832e943
Tree-SHA512: bb5635b0bd85fa9a76922a53ad3fa062286424c06a695a0e87407c665713e80a33555b644fbb13bcc1ab503dcd7f53aacbdc368d69ac0ecff8005603623ac94f
|
|
Better to perform the action only one time (during 'LoadWallet').
Where the value is being used.
|
|
incompatibility with descriptor wallet
e3609cdc01cf992800f28b20b0107b7fdc1f880e doc: Update importaddress mention incompatibility with descriptor wallet (BrokenProgrammer)
Pull request description:
This is related to #25363 and offers a small update to the error messages from `EnsureLegacyScriptPubKeyMan` and `EnsureConstLegacyScriptPubKeyMan` to mention that they only are compatible with legacy wallets.
The RPC documentation for `importaddress` is also updated to mention this as well as guide the user to the alternative `importdescriptors` for cases when using descriptor wallets.
I'm thinking that we can introduce a "porting guide" document mentioned in #25363 in a separate PR since I would have to make myself more familiar with the subject before being able to tackle that.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK e3609cdc01cf992800f28b20b0107b7fdc1f880e
achow101:
ACK e3609cdc01cf992800f28b20b0107b7fdc1f880e
Tree-SHA512: c7a924a7283fe59dc4e04c8c8fa034c15601f0b25eff09d975e98e2e8db5268ff470336b2d978d6916af9f782f9257b840d64bd15485b1742b4a8b8bfd0bb50f
|
|
|