| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
listunspent
a99a3c0bd6d5476503c015e23be569295fdd190c rpc: Validate provided keys for query_options parameter in listunspent (pasta)
Pull request description:
At Dash, one of our developers was working with the `listunspent` RPC command, but instead of saying "minimumAmount" he said "minimmumAmount" as such the RPC wasn't working as expected.
In https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/3507 we implemented a check so that `listunspent` returns an error if an unrecognized option is given. I figured I might as well adapt the code and throw up a PR here.
Cheers!
ACKs for top commit:
adaminsky:
ACK `a99a3c0bd`
meshcollider:
Seems fine to me. utACK a99a3c0bd6d5476503c015e23be569295fdd190c
Tree-SHA512: 9fccf14979849879a51b352afa3e1932ce4a6cfc2ee97b8d405ec6e65673fe94e302795e3ec0b440e6d252f13acda620e1f6a0e86c3fa918883c3fb4600a372c
|
|
b8405b833ad28351c80fb10f6f896f974013fd9e wallet: IsChange requires cs_wallet lock (João Barbosa)
d8441f30ff57e4ae98cff6694c995eaffc19c51a wallet: IsMine overloads require cs_wallet lock (João Barbosa)
a13cafc6c6998baedf3c5766259c21fcd763b99e wallet: GetWalletTx requires cs_wallet lock (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This change removes some unlock/lock and lock/lock cases regarding `GetWalletTx` and `IsMine` overloads.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK b8405b833ad28351c80fb10f6f896f974013fd9e
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK b8405b833ad28351c80fb10f6f896f974013fd9e. Just new commit since last review changing IsChange GetChange locks and adding annotations
Tree-SHA512: 40d37c4fe5d10a1407f57d899d5822bb285633d8dbfad8afcf15a9b41b428ed9971a9a7b1aae84318371155132df3002699a15dab56e004527d50c889829187d
|
|
|
|
71e0f07e9c5f0aef532b85c04807dcbedd04e0af util: remove unused c-string variant of atoi64() (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is another micro-PR "removing old cruft with potentially sharp edges" (quote by practicalswift, see #19739). Gets rid of the c-string variant of the function `atoi64()`, which is only used in fuzzers and on one place with `wallet/wallet.h` (where it is originally a `std::string` anyways and uses `.c_str()` -- this method call can simply be removed.)
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 71e0f07e9c5f0aef532b85c04807dcbedd04e0af -- diff looks correct
laanwj:
ACK 71e0f07e9c5f0aef532b85c04807dcbedd04e0af
Tree-SHA512: 4d1d28e2f5274fdbe0652e7a0f83dd416f4d19c1e1a49979927960a3ad40b0990eeaa4374656bf2c6998a965a14d62c1bc78303b7d583d3307c17828030a8e3b
|
|
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Dobson <dobsonsa68@gmail.com>
|
|
fa55c1d5fdd88c4bc4d361da231cd63b20255b50 build: Add Werror=range-loop-analysis (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The warning is implicitly enabled for Bitcoin Core. Also explicitly since commit d92204c900d.
To avoid "fix range loop" follow-up refactors, we have two options:
* Disable the warning, so that issues never appear
* Enable it as an error, so that issues are either caught locally or by ci
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa55c1d5fdd88c4bc4d361da231cd63b20255b50
practicalswift:
ACK fa55c1d5fdd88c4bc4d361da231cd63b20255b50 -- pre-review fix-up is better than post-review fix-up
hebasto:
re-ACK fa55c1d5fdd88c4bc4d361da231cd63b20255b50
Tree-SHA512: 019aa133f254af8882c1d5d10c420d9882305db0fc2aa9dad7d285168e2556306c3eedcc03bd30e63f11eae4cc82b648d83fb6e9179d6a6364651fb602d70134
|
|
|
|
specified range
7f13dfb587dd6a7a5b7dfbfe689ae0ce818fe5c9 test: test the implicit avoid partial spends functionality (Karl-Johan Alm)
b82067bf696c53f22536f9ca2e51949c164f6b06 wallet: try -avoidpartialspends mode and use its result if fees are below threshold (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
The `-avoidpartialspends` feature is normally disabled, as it may affect the optimal fee for payments. This PR introduces a new parameter `-maxapsfee` (max avoid partial spends fee) which acts on the following values:
* -1: disable partial spend avoidance completely (do not even try it)
* 0: only do partial spend avoidance if fees are the same or better as the regular coin selection
* 1..∞: use APS variant if the absolute fee difference is less than or equal to the max APS fee
For values other than -1, the code will now try partial spend avoidance once, and if that gives a value within the accepted range, it will use that.
Example: -maxapsfee=0.00001000 means the wallet will do regular coin select, APS coin select, and then pick AKS iff the absolute fee difference is <= 1000 satoshi.
Edit: updated this to reflect the fact we are now using a max fee.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK 7f13dfb587dd6a7a5b7dfbfe689ae0ce818fe5c9
achow101:
ACK 7f13dfb587dd6a7a5b7dfbfe689ae0ce818fe5c9
jonatack:
ACK 7f13dfb58, code review, debug build, verified the test fails with `AssertionError: not(2 == 1)` for the number of vouts when `-maxapsfee=0.0001` is changed to 0, and verified the new logging with an added assertion.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 7f13dfb587dd6a7a5b7dfbfe689ae0ce818fe5c9
Tree-SHA512: 475929df57f6191bb4e36bfbcad5a280a64bb0ecd8767b76cb2e44e2301235d0eb294a3f2fac5bbf15d35d7ecfba47acb2285feadb883c9ce31c08377e3afb3c
|
|
|
|
|
|
642ad31b418bbf8da06cb3641329b0810e18e55b Add loadwallet and createwallet RPC load_on_startup options (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This maintains a persistent list of wallets stored in settings that will automatically be loaded on startup. Being able to load a wallet automatically on startup will be more useful in the GUI, but it's reasonable to expose this feature by RPC as well.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 642ad31b418bbf8da06cb3641329b0810e18e55b Only change is the test
meshcollider:
re-utACK 642ad31b418bbf8da06cb3641329b0810e18e55b
Tree-SHA512: cca0b71bf1a83ad071830e6c459f1cd979b4add7144e899ec560da72b5910dd9bf9426e5c7d125ae96fad8990fbf81a76bc83c0459486c16086ada6cbde5eaa3
|
|
filtering to occur within the struct
9adc2f80fc14f11ee2b1f989ee7be71b58481e6f Refactor OutputGroups to handle effective values, fees, and filtering (Andrew Chow)
7d07e864b8846be186648814a5aaf34269f914a3 Use real value when calculating OutputGroup value (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently, the effective values and filtering for positive effective values is done outside of the OutputGroup. We should instead have functions in Outputgroup to do this and call those for each OutputGroup. So this PR does that.
This makes future changes for effective values in coin selection much easier.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 9adc2f80fc14f11ee2b1f989ee7be71b58481e6f
fjahr:
re-ACK 9adc2f80fc14f11ee2b1f989ee7be71b58481e6f
meshcollider:
Light code review ACK 9adc2f80fc14f11ee2b1f989ee7be71b58481e6f
Tree-SHA512: 7445c94b7295b45bcd83a6f8a5c8f6961a89453fcc856335192d4b4a66aec7724513616b04e5111588ab208c89b311055399d6279cd9c4ce452aefb85f04b64a
|
|
|
|
declarations
0e279fe4899beae8630264ef1fe420dd71f29d5d walletdb: Remove unused static functions from walletdb.h (Andrew Chow)
9f536d4fe949666f14a0bf5b814522cecde71f56 wallettool: Have RecoverDatabaseFile return errors and warnings (Andrew Chow)
06e263a4e368671ebb4e4a77c1447ebd5104a488 Call RecoverDatabaseFile directly from wallettool (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Followup to #19324 addressing some comments.
Removes the `SalvageWallet` function in wallettool and instead directly calls `RecoverDatabaseFile` as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19324#discussion_r450379596
Removes the `LogPrintf`s and `tfm::format`s in `RecoverDatabaseFile` as noted in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19324#discussion_r448027237
Removes the declarations of `VerifyEnvironment` and `VerifyDatabaseFile` that were forgotten in `walletdb.h` as noted in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19324#issuecomment-654389079
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 0e279fe4899beae8630264ef1fe420dd71f29d5d
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 0e279fe4899beae8630264ef1fe420dd71f29d5d, just dropped last commit
Tree-SHA512: ffd01f30536c2eab4bf40ba363c3ea916ecef3c8f0c5262040b40498776ffb00f95240204a40e38415d6931800851d0a3fa63ee91efc1d329b60ac317da0363d
|
|
e7448d66803f42984018ef8dfa6699027cb9536d wallet: Don't override signing errors (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
While reviewing #17204 I noticed that the errors in `input_errors` from `::SignTransaction` where being overridden by `CWallet::SignTransaction`. For example, a Script related error led to incomplete signature data which led to `CWallet::SignTransaction` reporting that keys were missing, which was a less precise error than the original one.
Additionally, the error `"Input not found or already spent"` is [duplicated in `sign.cpp`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/c7b4968552c704f1e2e9a046911e1207f5af5fe0/src/script/sign.cpp#L481), so the error here is redundant at the moment. So technically the whole error block could be removed, I think. However, this code is affected by the ongoing work on the wallet so there might be a reason why these errors are here. But even if there is a reason to keep them, I don't think existing, potentially more precise errors should be overridden here unless we want to hide them from the users. I am looking for feedback if this is a work in progress state where these errors could be more useful in the future or if they can be removed.
On testing: even though [the errors in `CWallet` are covered](https://marcofalke.github.io/btc_cov/total.coverage/src/wallet/wallet.cpp.gcov.html), all tests still pass after removing them. I am not sure if there is a desire to cover these specific error messages, tests in `test/functional/rpc_signrawtransaction.py` seem to aim for a more generic approach.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e7448d66803f42984018ef8dfa6699027cb9536d
meshcollider:
Code review ACK e7448d66803f42984018ef8dfa6699027cb9536d
Tree-SHA512: 3e2bc11d05379d2aef87b093a383d1b044787efc70e35955b2f8ecd028b6acef02f386180566af6a1a63193635f5d685466e2f6141c96326c49ffc5c81ca3e23
|
|
f110b7c722eb150816a26cab161ac2b8c0f58609 rpc: document returned error fields as optional if applicable (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The following RPCs return error fields (named `"error"` or `"errors"`) that are optional, but don't show up as optional in the help text yet:
* `analyzepsbt`
* `estimatesmartfee`
* `signrawtransactionwithkey`
* `signrawtransactionwithwallet`
The following RPC has the errors field already marked as optional, but doesn't match the usual format in the description (like `"if there are any"` in parantheses):
* `estimaterawfee`
This PR adds the missing optional flags and adapts the description strings. Inspired by a recent PR #19634 by justinmoon.
The instances were found via `git grep "RPCResult.*\"error"`. Note that there is one RPC so far where the return error is not optional (i.e. in case of no error, the field is included in the result, but is just empty), namely `bumpfee`.
ACKs for top commit:
adaminsky:
ACK `f110b7c`
laanwj:
ACK f110b7c722eb150816a26cab161ac2b8c0f58609, new documentation looks consistent with actual behavior
achow101:
ACK f110b7c722eb150816a26cab161ac2b8c0f58609
meshcollider:
utACK f110b7c722eb150816a26cab161ac2b8c0f58609
Tree-SHA512: 30c00f78a575b60e32b4536496af986d53a25f33e6ebbf553adcdcf825ad21a44f90267f3d1ea53326dac83bcfa9983fdb3dad6d3126e20f97f3c08ce286e188
|
|
This maintains a persistent list of wallets stored in settings that will
automatically be loaded on startup. Being able to load a wallet automatically
on startup will be more useful in the GUI when the option to create wallets is
added in #15006, but it's reasonable to expose this feature by RPC as well.
|
|
count
c133cdcdc3397a734d57e05494682bf9bf6f4c15 Cap listsinceblock target_confirmations param (Adam Stein)
Pull request description:
This addresses an issue brought up in #19587.
Currently, the `target_confirmations` parameter to `listsinceblock` is not checked for being too large. When `target_confirmations` is greater than one more than the current number of blocks, `listsinceblock` fails with error code -1. In comparison, when `target_confirmations` is less than 1, a -8 "Invalid parameter" error code is thrown.
This PR fixes the issue by returning a -8 "Invalid parameter" error if the `target_confirmations` value corresponds to a block with more confirmations than the genesis block. This happens if `target_confirmations` exceeds one more than the number of blocks.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK c133cdcdc3397a734d57e05494682bf9bf6f4c15
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK c133cdcdc3397a734d57e05494682bf9bf6f4c15. Just suggested changes since last review. Thanks!
Tree-SHA512: 02680f4cb937d2c24d5019abd0ebfa188b8a50679a1e64e9c26bfe5c17eef6aea906832e6e2d492ba8a2ea160041bf185d66795ee691e340f6793db03c21b89a
|
|
79d6332e9e4fc01e6418247c31e31b4faa1b3b84 moveonly: Fix indentation in bumpfee RPC (Andrew Chow)
431071c28ae35be8aa012df51233be19067d625c Hide bumpfee's psbt creation behavior behind -deprecatedrpc (Andrew Chow)
4638224f64ba7c8ea7c4fb550ec89c6a6d8c7887 Add psbtbumpfee RPC (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds a new RPC `psbtbumpfee` which always creates a psbt. `bumpfee` will then only be able to create and broadcast fee bumping transactions instead of changing its behavior based on `IsWalletSet(WALLET_FLAG_DISABLE_PRIVATE_KEYS)`.
Split from #18627
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 79d6332
meshcollider:
utACK 79d6332e9e4fc01e6418247c31e31b4faa1b3b84
fjahr:
Code review ACK 79d6332e9e4fc01e6418247c31e31b4faa1b3b84
Tree-SHA512: 1c92c4b4461bb30e78be3ee73165f624398ef33996ce36043b61a8931be667030d0fca12fd0b30097b78c56e4e9092c69582b237cbdac51d56f6be23d8c0f1bb
|
|
Previously, listsinceblock would fail with error code -1 when the
target_confirmations exceeded the number of confirmations of the genesis
block. This commit allows target_confirmations to refer to a lastblock
hash with more confirmations than exist in the chain by setting the
lastblock hash to the genesis hash in this case. This allows for
`listsinceblock "" 6` to not fail if the block count is less than 5
which may happen on regtest.
Includes update to the functional test for listsinceblock to test for
this case.
|
|
Instead of having callers set the fees, effective values, and filtering
of outputs, do these within OutputGroups themselves as member functions.
m_fee and m_long_term_fee is added to OutputGroup to track the fees of
the OutputGroup.
|
|
0a8aa626dd69a357e1b798b07b64cf4177a464a3 refactor: Make HexStr take a span (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Make `HexSt`r take a span of bytes, instead of an awkward pair of templated iterators. This simplifies most of the uses.
ACKs for top commit:
elichai:
Code review ACK 0a8aa626dd69a357e1b798b07b64cf4177a464a3
hebasto:
re-ACK 0a8aa626dd69a357e1b798b07b64cf4177a464a3
jonatack:
re-ACK 0a8aa626dd69a357e1b798b07b64cf4177a464a3
Tree-SHA512: 6e178ece5cbac62119c857a10299b1e85422938084c3f03063e17119a5129e0c28016e05a6fabaa4c271a7e0a37c7cd89fa47c435ee19b38a5acfe80d00de992
|
|
Make HexStr take a span of bytes, instead of an awkward pair of
templated iterators.
|
|
threshold
The threshold is defined by a new max avoid partial spends fee flag, which defaults to 0 (i.e. if fees are unchanged, use the grouped option).
|
|
f916847d2b56f2935c169e1b95b350a477c804cc rpc: Document getwalletinfo's unlocked_until field as optional (Justin Moon)
Pull request description:
The `getwalletinfo` RPC command's `unlocked_until` field is [optional in the code](https://github.com/justinmoon/bitcoin/blob/f916847d2b56f2935c169e1b95b350a477c804cc/src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp#L2397), but wasn't marked as optional in the docs.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19634/commits/f916847d2b56f2935c169e1b95b350a477c804cc
achow101:
ACK f916847d2b56f2935c169e1b95b350a477c804cc
kristapsk:
ACK f916847d2b56f2935c169e1b95b350a477c804cc
Tree-SHA512: 8d82f0992fdaf8160000acf4a6e7e7f9ff289a90a983be2e078cf754f4b03601637e5f405afa66bd55adef9b347fa5eac5cc1822033b2ac08c587609cf3dfe0f
|
|
Affects the following RPCs:
- analyzepsbt
- estimatesmartfee
- signrawtransactionwithkey
- signrawtransactionwithwallet
For the RPC estimaterawfee, the description message was adapted
to match the other optional ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OutputGroup::m_value is the true value, not the effective value,
so use the true values of the outputs, not their effective values.
|
|
8ed9002cd14165f751442f738fbf1fb8a37611b2 refactor: use local argsmanager in CRegTestParams (Ivan Metlushko)
9b20f6682845870d6ac53a01d3166fb83c467e7d scripted-diff: Replace gArgs with local argsman (Ivan Metlushko)
a316e9ce265212a7c6c4ef7922420f6ecba9e7b0 refactor: add unused ArgsManager to replace gArgs (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Rationale: reduce use of gArgs to decouple code and simplify future maintenance and easier unit testing.
This PR is continuation of work started in #18926 and #18662
It covers only places that register args in ArgsManager with `AddArgs()` or `AddHiddenArgs()`.
Closes #19511
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 8ed9002cd14165f751442f738fbf1fb8a37611b2 👛
Tree-SHA512: 7e6ba8e8357a48833c71e9c3942a769acb3d93bdcc6748a8ef2b7c4461a2499419b60896abf1d8b6bf8e88ee2590284cdd5da64220243ac22375300bcb8fe3e8
|
|
Previously having no database handle could still be considered a success
when BerkeleyDatabase and BerkeleyBatch were used for dummy database
things. With dedicated DummyDatabase and DummyBatch classes now, these
should fail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i -e 's/gArgs.Add/argsman.Add/g' `git grep -l "gArgs.Add"`
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
|
|
VerifyEnvironment and VerifyDatabaseFile were removed, but their
declarations weren't. Remove those.
|
|
Instead of logging or printing these errors and warnings, return them to
the caller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since we have .walletlock in each directory, we don't need the duplicate
fileid checks across all dbenvs as it shouldn't be possible anyways.
|
|
Instead of opening the Db handle in BerkeleyBatch, make BerkeleyDatabase
do that.
|
|
Instead of having BerkeleyEnvironment track the file use count, make
BerkeleyDatabase do it itself.
|
|
|
|
d416ae560e46a4846a3fd5990b7d390d2ef30ec8 walletdb: Introduce WalletDatabase abstract class (Andrew Chow)
2179dbcbcd0b9bef7ad9c907b85294b9a1bccf0f walletdb: Add BerkeleyDatabase::Open dummy function (Andrew Chow)
71d28e7cdca1c8553531bb3a4725d7916363ec5c walletdb: Introduce AddRef and RemoveRef functions (Andrew Chow)
27b27663849932971eb5deadb1f19234b9cd97ea walletdb: Move BerkeleyDatabase::Flush(true) to Close() (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
A `WalletDatabase` abstract class is created from `BerkeleyDatabase` and is implemented by `BerkeleyDatabase`. First, to get to the point that this is possible, 4 functions need to be added to `BerkeleyDatabase`: `AddRef`, `RemoveRef`, `Open`, and `Close`.
First the increment and decrement of `mapFileUseCount` is refactored into separate functions `AddRef` and `RemoveRef`.
`Open` is introduced as a dummy function. This will raise an exception so that it always fails.
`Close` is refactored from `Flush`. The `shutdown` argument in `Flush` is removed and instead `Flush(true)` is now the `Close` function.
Split from #18971
Requires #19325
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d416ae560e46a4846a3fd5990b7d390d2ef30ec8. Only changes since last review were rebasing after base PR #19334 merge, and adding cs_db lock in BerkeleyDatabase destructor, which should avoid races accessing env->m_databases and env->m_fileids
fjahr:
Code review ACK d416ae560e46a4846a3fd5990b7d390d2ef30ec8
meshcollider:
Code review & test run ACK d416ae560e46a4846a3fd5990b7d390d2ef30ec8
Tree-SHA512: 98d05ec093d7446c4488e2b0914584222a331e9a2f4d5be6af98e3f6d78fdd8e75526c12f91a8a52d4820c25bce02aa02aabe92d38bee7eb2fce07d0691b7b0d
|
|
1554b54d47d7e24ce2491f57d24e56d38ceb7649 Static asserts for consistency of fee defaults. (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
This adds `static_assert`'s that ensure that the default values given for fee levels in the wallet (minimum fee and incremental feerate increase) are at least as high as the corresponding levels configured in the core node policy. Since the core policy values are enforced by the network, it makes sense for the wallet to be conservative and above (or at least not below) this.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 1554b54d47d7e24ce2491f57d24e56d38ceb7649, these assumptions seem straightforward
Tree-SHA512: 50e5adf082f467062334377f82a3ee75bcfd436afc65bd0eb33c8d0549d6d90fd1f48c31f60cabe523eb59be9efa8ae0879e9e09cd51ca9c1bd466631ce03cf4
|
|
When using the salvage command, call RecoverDatabaseFile directly
instead of SalvageWallet. Also removes SalvageWallet as it is no longer
needed.
SalvageWallet was doing an additional verify on the database which would
caause the salvage to sometimes fail. This is not needed.
|
|
d0ea9bab2804928c9f40def61fd99064d2d8f9b8 walletdb: Don't remove database transaction logs and instead error (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Instead of removing the database transaction logs and retrying the
wallet loading, just return an error message to the user. Additionally,
speciically for DB_RUNRECOVERY, notify the user that this could be due
to different BDB versions.
Kind of implements the suggestion from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18870#discussion_r421647964
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK d0ea9bab2804928c9f40def61fd99064d2d8f9b8
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d0ea9bab2804928c9f40def61fd99064d2d8f9b8. Only changes since last review are rebase and expanding error and commit messages.
Tree-SHA512: f6e67dc70f58188742a5c8af7cdc63a2b58779aa0d26ae7f1e75805a239f1a342433860e5a238d6577fae5ab04b9d15e7f11c55b867065dfd13781a6a62e4958
|
|
Make WalletDatabase actually an abstract class and not just a typedef
for BerkeleyDatabase. Have BerkeleyDatabase inherit this class.
|
|
Adds an Open function for the class abstraction that does nothing for
now.
|
