| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It's a feerate, not a fee. Also follow the style guide for member names.
Github-Pull: #21083
Rebased-From: f9cd2bfbccb7a2b8ff07cec5f6d2adbeca5f07c3
|
|
Instead of fetching the discard feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, fetch and cache it once during CreateTransaction so that it
is shared for each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_discard_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
Github-Pull: #21083
Rebased-From: bdd0c2934b7f389ffcfae3b602ee3ecee8581acd
|
|
Instead of setting the long term feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, set it once during CreateTransaction and let it be shared
with each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_long_term_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
Github-Pull: #21083
Rebased-From: 448d04b931f86941903e855f831249ff5ec77485
|
|
963696288955dc31b3a4fd136bfb791a9d99755b [upgradewallet] removed unused warning param (Sishir Giri)
Pull request description:
The `warning` variable was unused in `upgradewallet` so I removed it
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 963696288955dc31b3a4fd136bfb791a9d99755b: diff looks correct
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 963696288955dc31b3a4fd136bfb791a9d99755b
jonatack:
ACK 963696288955dc31b3a4fd136bfb791a9d99755b
Tree-SHA512: 1d63186ce1e05e86a778340f2d7986c2cee1523de0a11cea39e8d148ac7ee26c49741dfa302b5c1cd1c8d74e67c1f9baee2763720c2d850b57da9a3fdce24565
|
|
|
|
5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab wallet: Remove -upgradewallet from dummywallet (MarcoFalke)
a314271f08215feba53ead27096ac7fda34acb3c test: Remove unused wallet.dat (MarcoFalke)
bf7635963c03203e7189ddaa56c6b086a0108cbf tests: Test specific upgradewallet scenarios and that upgrades work (Andrew Chow)
4b418a9decc3e855ee4b0bbf9e61121c8e9904e5 test: Add test_framework/bdb.py module for inspecting bdb files (Andrew Chow)
092fc434854f881330771a93a1280ac67b1d3549 tests: Add a sha256sum_file function to util (Andrew Chow)
0bd995aa19be65b0dd23df1df571c71428c2bc32 wallet: upgrade the CHDChain version number when upgrading to split hd (Andrew Chow)
8e32e1c41c995e832e643f605d35a7aa112837e6 wallet: remove nWalletMaxVersion (Andrew Chow)
bd7398cc6258c258e9f4411c50630ec4a552341b wallet: have ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade check against the new version (Andrew Chow)
5f720544f34dedf75b063b962845fa8eca604514 wallet: Add GetClosestWalletFeature function (Andrew Chow)
842ae3842df489f1b8d68e67a234788966218184 wallet: Add utility method for CanSupportFeature (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR cleans up the wallet upgrade mechanism a bit, fixes some probably bugs, and adds more test cases.
The `nWalletMaxVersion` member variable has been removed as it made `CanSupportFeature` unintuitive and was causing a couple of bugs. The reason this was introduced originally was to allow a wallet upgrade to only occur when the new feature is first used. While this makes sense for the old `-upgradewallet` option, for an RPC, this does not quite make sense. It's more intuitive for an upgrade to occur if possible if the `upgradewallet` RPC is used as that's an explicit request to upgrade a particular wallet to a newer version. `nWalletMaxVersion` was only relevant for upgrades to `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` and `FEATURE_COMPRPUBKEY` both of which are incredibly old features. So for such wallets, the behavior of `upgradewallet` will be that the feature is enabled immediately without the wallet needing to be encrypted at that time (note that `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` indicates support for encryption, not that the wallet is encrypted) or for a new key to be generated.
`CanSupportFeature` would previously indicate whether we could upgrade to `nWalletMaxVersion` not just whether the current wallet version supported a feature. While this property was being used to determine whether we should upgrade to HD and HD chain split, it was also causing a few bugs. Determining whether we should upgrade to HD or HD chain split is resolved by passing into `ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade` the version we are upgrading to and checking against that. By removing `nWalletMaxVersion` we also fix a bug where you could upgrade to HD chain split without the pre-split keypool.
`nWalletMaxVersion` was also the version that was being reported by `getwalletinfo` which meant that the version reported was not always consistent across restarts as it depended on whether `upgradewallet` was used. Additionally to make the wallet versions consistent with actually supported versions, instead of just setting the wallet version to whatever is given to `upgradewallet`, we normalize the version number to the closest supported version number. For example, if given 150000, we would store and report 139900.
Another bug where CHDChain was not being upgraded to the version supporting HD chain split is also fixed by this PR.
Lastly several more tests have been added. Some refactoring to the test was made to make these tests easier. These tests check specific upgrading scenarios, such as from non-HD (version 60000) to HD to pre-split keypool. Although not specifically related to `upgradewallet`, `UpgradeKeyMetadata` is now being tested too.
Part of the new tests is checking that the wallet files are identical before and after failed upgrades. To facilitate this, a utility function `sha256sum_file` has been added. Another part of the tests is to examine the wallet file itself to ensure that the records in the wallet.dat file have been correctly modified. So a new `bdb.py` module has been added to deserialize the BDB db of the wallet.dat file. This format isn't explicitly documented anywhere, but the code and comments in BDB's source code in file `dbinc/db_page.h` describe it. This module just dumps all of the fields into a dict.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
approach ACK 5f9c0b6360
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab
jonatack:
ACK 5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab, approach seems fine, code review, only skimmed the test changes but they look well done, rebased on current master, debug built and verified the `wallet_upgradewallet.py` test runs green both before and after running `test/get_previous_releases.py -b v0.19.1 v0.18.1 v0.17.2 v0.16.3 v0.15.2`
Tree-SHA512: 7c4ebf420850d596a586cb6dd7f2ef39c6477847d12d105fcd362abb07f2a8aa4f7afc5bfd36cbc8b8c72fcdd1de8d2d3f16ad8e8ba736b6f4f31f133fe5feba
|
|
nWalletMaxVersion was used to allow an upgrade to a version only
when the new feature was used. This makes sense for the old
-upgradewallet startup option. But because upgradewallet is now a RPC,
putting off the version bump like this does not make sense. Instead,
immediately upgrading to the given version number makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MakeWalletDatabase no longer has a default DatabaseFormat. Instead
callers, like CWallet::Create, need to specify the database type to
create if the file does not exist. If it exists and NONE is given, then
CreateWalletDatabase will try to autodetect the type.
|
|
69cf5d4eeb73f7d685e915fc17af64634d88a4a2 [test] Make sure send rpc returns fee reason (Sishir Giri)
d5863c0b3e20d56acf7246008b7832efde68ab21 [send] Make send RPCs return fee reason (Sishir Giri)
Pull request description:
Whenever a wallet funds a transaction, the fee reason is reported to the user only if the verbose is set to true. I added an extra parameter to `CreateTransaction` function in wallet.cpp. Then I implemented the fee reason return logic in `SendMoney` in rpcwallet.cpp, followed by verbose parameter in `sendtoaddress` and `sendmany` functions. I also added a fee reason test case in walletbasic.py.
link to the issue: https://github.com/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/issues/22#issue-616251578
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19501/commits/69cf5d4eeb73f7d685e915fc17af64634d88a4a2
meshcollider:
utACK 69cf5d4eeb73f7d685e915fc17af64634d88a4a2
Tree-SHA512: 2e3af32dcfbd5511ba95f8bc8edca7acfe709a8430ff03e43172e5d0af3dfa4b2f57906978e7f272d878043b9ed8c6004674cf47d7496b005d5f612e9a58aa0e
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using the zmq notifications to avoid excessive mempool polling can be difficult
given the current notifications available. It announces all transactions
being added to mempool or included in blocks, but announces no evictions
and gives no indication if the transaction is in the mempool or a block.
Block notifications for zmq are also substandard, in that it only announces
block tips, while all block transactions are still announced.
This commit adds a unified stream which can be used to closely track mempool:
1) getrawmempool to fill out mempool knowledge
2) if txhash is announced, add or remove from set
based on add/remove flag
3) if blockhash is announced, get block txn list,
remove from those transactions local view of mempool
4) if we drop a sequence number, go to (1)
The mempool sequence number starts at the value 1, and
increments each time a transaction enters the mempool,
or is evicted from the mempool for any reason, including
block inclusion. The mempool sequence number is published
via ZMQ for any transaction-related notification.
These features allow for ZMQ/RPC consumer to track mempool
state in a more exacting way, without unnecesarily polling
getrawmempool. See interface_zmq.py::test_mempool_sync for
example usage.
|
|
No changes in behavior
|
|
Checks are now consolidated in MakeBerkeleyDatabase function instead of
happening in higher level code.
This commit does not change behavior except for error messages which now
include more complete information.
|
|
No changes in behavior. Just replaces arguments and return types
|
|
This removes a source of complexity and indirection that makes it harder to
understand path checking code. Path checks will be simplified in upcoming
commits.
There is no change in behavior in this commit other than a slightly more
descriptive error message in `loadwallet` if the default "" wallet can't be
found. (The error message is improved more in upcoming commit "wallet: Remove
path checking code from loadwallet RPC".)
|
|
f1ee37319a7a211e5fb325406d62db5b61dbd30e wallet: Reload previously loaded wallets on GUI startup (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Enable the GUI to also use the load_on_startup feature. Wallets loaded in the GUI always have load_on_startup=true. When they are unloaded from the GUI, load_on_startup=false.
To facilitate this change, UpdateWalletSetting is moved into the wallet module and called from within LoadWallet, RemoveWallet, and Createwallet. This change does not actually touch the GUI code but rather the wallet functions that are shared between the GUI and RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK f1ee37319a7a211e5fb325406d62db5b61dbd30e - works as expected. Wallets loaded via bitcoin-cli (in `-server` mode) or through the RPC console won't be loaded on startup but wallets loaded via the GUI menu will.
kristapsk:
ACK f1ee37319a7a211e5fb325406d62db5b61dbd30e, I have tested the code.
Tree-SHA512: f5b44aa763cf761d919015c5fbc0600b72434aa71e3b57007fd7530a29c3da1a9a0c98c4f22cb6cdffba61150a31170056a7d4737625e7b76f6958f3d584da8c
|
|
Enable the GUI to also use the load_on_startup feature.
Wallets loaded in the GUI always have load_on_startup=true.
When they are unloaded from the GUI, load_on_startup=false.
To facilitate this change, UpdateWalletSetting is moved into the wallet
module and called from within LoadWallet, RemoveWallet, and
Createwallet. This change does not actually touch the GUI code but
rather the wallet functions that are shared between the GUI and RPC.
|
|
ea74e10acf17903e44c85e3678853414653dd4e1 doc: Add best practice for annotating/asserting locks (Hennadii Stepanov)
2ee7743fe723227f2ea1b031eddb14fc6863f4c8 sync.h: Make runtime lock checks require compile-time lock checks (Anthony Towns)
23d71d171e6e22ba5e4a909d597a54595b2a2c1f Do not hide compile-time thread safety warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
3ddc150857178bfb1c854c05bf9b526777876f56 Add missed thread safety annotations (Hennadii Stepanov)
af9ea55a72c94678b343f5dd98dc78f3a3ac58cb Use LockAssertion utility class instead of AssertLockHeld() (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On the way of transit from `RecursiveMutex` to `Mutex` (see #19303) it is crucial to have run-time `AssertLockHeld()` assertion that does _not_ hide compile-time Clang Thread Safety Analysis warnings.
On master (65e4ecabd5b4252154640c7bac38c92a3f3a7018) using `AssertLockHeld()` could hide Clang Thread Safety Analysis warnings, e.g., with the following patch applied:
```diff
--- a/src/txmempool.h
+++ b/src/txmempool.h
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ public:
void addUnchecked(const CTxMemPoolEntry& entry, setEntries& setAncestors, bool validFeeEstimate = true) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main);
void removeRecursive(const CTransaction& tx, MemPoolRemovalReason reason) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
- void removeForReorg(const CCoinsViewCache* pcoins, unsigned int nMemPoolHeight, int flags) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main);
+ void removeForReorg(const CCoinsViewCache* pcoins, unsigned int nMemPoolHeight, int flags) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
void removeConflicts(const CTransaction& tx) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
void removeForBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx, unsigned int nBlockHeight) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
```
Clang compiles the code without any thread safety warnings.
See "Add missed thread safety annotations" commit for the actual thread safety warnings that are fixed in this PR.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK ea74e10acf 🎙
jnewbery:
ACK ea74e10acf17903e44c85e3678853414653dd4e1
ajtowns:
ACK ea74e10acf17903e44c85e3678853414653dd4e1
Tree-SHA512: 8cba996e526751a1cb0e613c0cc1b10f027a3e9945fbfb4bd30f6355fd36b9f9c2e1e95ed3183fc254b42df7c30223278e18e5bdb5e1ef85db7fef067595d447
|
|
3340dbadd38f5624642cf0e14dddbe6f83a3863b Remove -zapwallettxes (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It's not clear what use there is to keeping `-zapwallettxes` given that it's intended usage has been superseded by `abandontransaction`. So this removes it outright.
Alternative to #19700
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK 3340dbadd38f5624642cf0e14dddbe6f83a3863b
fanquake:
ACK 3340dbadd38f5624642cf0e14dddbe6f83a3863b - remaining manpage references will get cleaned up pre-release.
Tree-SHA512: 3e58e1ef6f4f94894d012b93e88baba3fb9c2ad75b8349403f9ce95b80b50b0b4f443cb623cf76c355930db109f491b3442be3aa02972e841450ce52cf545fc8
|
|
-zapwallettxes is made a hidden option to inform users that it is
removed and they should be using abandontransaction to do the stuck
transaction thing.
|
|
|
|
This is needed for upcoming commit "sync.h: Make runtime lock checks
require compile-time lock checks" to pass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
b8405b833ad28351c80fb10f6f896f974013fd9e wallet: IsChange requires cs_wallet lock (João Barbosa)
d8441f30ff57e4ae98cff6694c995eaffc19c51a wallet: IsMine overloads require cs_wallet lock (João Barbosa)
a13cafc6c6998baedf3c5766259c21fcd763b99e wallet: GetWalletTx requires cs_wallet lock (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This change removes some unlock/lock and lock/lock cases regarding `GetWalletTx` and `IsMine` overloads.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK b8405b833ad28351c80fb10f6f896f974013fd9e
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK b8405b833ad28351c80fb10f6f896f974013fd9e. Just new commit since last review changing IsChange GetChange locks and adding annotations
Tree-SHA512: 40d37c4fe5d10a1407f57d899d5822bb285633d8dbfad8afcf15a9b41b428ed9971a9a7b1aae84318371155132df3002699a15dab56e004527d50c889829187d
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
threshold
The threshold is defined by a new max avoid partial spends fee flag, which defaults to 0 (i.e. if fees are unchanged, use the grouped option).
|
|
Instead of having Flush optionally shutdown the database and
environment, add a Close() function that does that.
|
|
variants
3a9aba21a49a6d80bd187940d5e26893937b6832 Split SetWalletFlags into Add/LoadWalletFlags (Andrew Chow)
d9cd095b5965fc20c09f401370e7ba99446663e3 Split SetActiveScriptPubKeyMan into Add/LoadActiveScriptPubKeyMan (Andrew Chow)
0122fbab4c340b23ae56173de6c5ab866ba25ab8 Split SetHDChain into AddHDChain and LoadHDChain (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`SetHDChaiin`, `SetActiveScriptPubKeyMan`, and `SetWalletFlags` have a `memonly` argument which is kind of confusing, as noted in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17681#discussion_r427633081. This PR replaces those functions with `Add*` and `Load*` variants so that they follow the pattern used elsewhere in the wallet.
`AddHDChain`, `AddActiveScriptPubKeyMan`, and `AddWalletFlags` both set their respective variables in `CWallet` and writes them to disk. These functions are used by the actions which modify the wallet such as `sethdseed`, `importdescriptors`, and creating a new wallet.
`LoadHDChain`, `LoadActiveScriptPubKeyMan`, and `LoadWalletFlags` just set the `CWallet` variables. These functions are used by `LoadWallet` when loading the wallet from disk.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 3a9aba21a49a6d80bd187940d5e26893937b6832
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 3a9aba21a49a6d80bd187940d5e26893937b6832. Only changes since last review tweaks making m_wallet_flags updates more safe
meshcollider:
utACK 3a9aba21a49a6d80bd187940d5e26893937b6832
Tree-SHA512: 365aeaafc5ba42879c0eb797ec3beb29ab70e27f917dc880763f743420b3be6ddf797240996beed8a9ad70fb212c2590253c6b44c9dc244529c3939d9538983f
|
|
fa927ff884ae373c676deed63180a8d238872cdc Enable Wswitch for OutputType (MarcoFalke)
faddad71f648ed99734f4f8811bd4bc7232ca670 Remove confusing OutputType::CHANGE_AUTO (MarcoFalke)
fa2eb383522249a5f4d48726c520cec5de496614 interfaces: Remove unused getDefaultChangeType (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`OutputType::CHANGE_AUTO` is problematic for several reasons:
* An output that is not change must never be described by `CHANGE_AUTO`. Simply allowing that option makes the code confusing and review harder than it needs to be.
* To make review even harder, `CHANGE_AUTO` requires `-Wswitch` to be disabled for `OutputType`
Fix both issues by removing `CHANGE_AUTO` and then enabling `-Wswitch` for `OutputType`
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fa927ff884ae373c676deed63180a8d238872cdc.
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa927ff884ae373c676deed63180a8d238872cdc
Tree-SHA512: 24fd809757aa343866c94dafe9a7130b50cda4f77c97666d407f99b813f75b115a7d8e688a6bc2a737e87cba64ddd4e43f2b3c5538fd35fabb5845807bb39134
|
|
|
|
ui_interface is in libbitcoin_server and can not be included in the
wallet because the wallet does not link with server symbols.
|
|
Remove memonly bool and follow typical Add and Load pattern used
everywhere else.
|
|
In FillPSBT, optionally report the number of inputs we successfully
signed, as an out parameter. If "sign" is false, instead report the
number of inputs for which GetSigningProvider does not return nullptr.
(This is a potentially overbroad estimate of inputs we could sign.)
|
|
|
|
notifications
7eaf86d3bfc83f2beb3ef449707d5156853126fb trivial: Suggested cleanups to surrounding code (Russell Yanofsky)
b604c5c8b5892842f13dee89ae31812a28ab25d1 wallet: Minimal fix to restore conflicted transaction notifications (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This fix is a based on the fix by Antoine Riard (ariard) in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18600.
Unlike that PR, which implements some new behavior, this just restores previous wallet notification and status behavior for transactions removed from the mempool because they conflict with transactions in a block. The behavior was accidentally changed in two `CWallet::BlockConnected` updates: a31be09bfd77eed497a8e251d31358e16e2f2eb1 and 7e89994133725125dddbfa8d45484e3b9ed51c6e from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16624, causing issue https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18325.
The change here could be improved and replaced with a more comprehensive cleanup, so it includes a detailed comment explaining future considerations.
Fixes #18325
Co-authored-by: Antoine Riard (ariard)
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Re-ACK 7eaf86d3bfc83f
ariard:
ACK 7eaf86d, reviewed, built and ran tests.
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7eaf86d3bfc83f2beb3ef449707d5156853126fb 🍡
Tree-SHA512: 9a1efe975969bb522a9dd73c41064a9348887cb67883cd92c6571fd2df4321b9f4568363891abdaae14a3b9b168ef8142e95c373fc04677e46289b251fb84689
|
|
5478d6c099e76fe070703cc5383cba7b91468b0f logging: thread safety annotations (Anthony Towns)
e685ca19928eec4e687c66f5edfcfff085a42c27 util/system.cpp: add thread safety annotations for dir_locks (Anthony Towns)
a7887899480db72328784009181d93904e6d479d test/checkqueue_tests: thread safety annotations (Anthony Towns)
479c5846f7477625ec275fbb8a076c7ef157172b rpc/blockchain.cpp: thread safety annotations for latestblock (Anthony Towns)
8b5af3d4c1270267ad85e78f661bf8fab06f3aad net: fMsgProcWake use LOCK instead of lock_guard (Anthony Towns)
de7c5f41aba860751ef7824245e6d9d5088a1200 wallet/wallet.h: Remove mutexScanning which was only protecting a single atomic bool (Anthony Towns)
c3cf2f55013c4ea1c1ef4a878fc7ff8e92f2c42d rpc/blockchain.cpp: Remove g_utxosetscan mutex that is only protecting a single atomic variable (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
In a few cases we need to use `std::mutex` rather than the sync.h primitives. But `std::lock_guard<std::mutex>` doesn't include the clang thread safety annotations unless you also use clang's C library, which means you can't indicate when variables should be guarded by `std::mutex` mutexes.
This adds an annotated version of `std::lock_guard<std::mutex>` to threadsafety.h to fix that, and modifies places where `std::mutex` is used to take advantage of the annotations.
It's based on top of #16112, and turns the thread safety comments included there into annotations.
It also changes the RAII classes in wallet/wallet.h and rpc/blockchain.cpp to just use the atomic<bool> flag for synchronisation rather than having a mutex that doesn't actually guard anything as well.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5478d6c099e76fe070703cc5383cba7b91468b0f 🗾
hebasto:
re-ACK 5478d6c099e76fe070703cc5383cba7b91468b0f, only renamed s/`MutexGuard`/`LockGuard`/, and dropped the commit "test/util_threadnames_tests: add thread safety annotations" since the [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16127#pullrequestreview-414184113) review.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 5478d6c099e76fe070703cc5383cba7b91468b0f. Thanks for taking suggestions! Only changes since last review are dropping thread rename test commit d53072ec730d8eec5a5b72f7e65a54b141e62b19 and renaming mutex guard to lock guard
Tree-SHA512: 7b00d31f6f2b5a222ec69431eb810a74abf0542db3a65d1bbad54e354c40df2857ec89c00b4a5e466c81ba223267ca95f3f98d5fbc1a1d052a2c3a7d2209790a
|
|
84ae0578b6c68dda145ca65fef510ce0fdac0d7b Add release notes about salvage changes (Andrew Chow)
ea337f2d0318a860f695698cfb3aa91c03ded858 Move RecoverKeysOnlyFilter into RecoverDataBaseFile (Andrew Chow)
9ea2d258b46e8a9776100633585ed0feede5c2a4 Move RecoverDatabaseFile and RecoverKeysOnlyFilter into salvage.{cpp/h} (Andrew Chow)
b426c7764d26e280e1f814cf36e050743c45cd12 Make BerkeleyBatch::Recover and WalletBatch::RecoverKeysOnlyFilter standalone (Andrew Chow)
2741774214168eb287c7066d6823afe5e570381d Expose a version of ReadKeyValue and use it in RecoverKeysOnlyFilter (Andrew Chow)
ced95d0e43389fe62b5d30fcc7c42dbca0e88242 Move BerkeleyEnvironment::Salvage into BerkeleyBatch::Recover (Andrew Chow)
07250b8dcebe2b97ed0fd900ad35cba4091b8ecf walletdb: remove fAggressive from Salvage (Andrew Chow)
8ebcbc85c652665b78dcfd2ad55fa67cafd42c73 walletdb: don't automatically salvage when corruption is detected (Andrew Chow)
d321046f4bb4887742699c586755a21f3a2edbe1 wallet: remove -salvagewallet (Andrew Chow)
cdd955e580dff99f3fa440494ed2b348f7f094af Add basic test for bitcoin-wallet salvage (Andrew Chow)
c87770915b88d195d264b58111c64142b1965cfa wallettool: Add a salvage command (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Removes the `-salvagewallet` startup option and adds a `salvage` command to the `bitcoin-wallet` tool. As such, `-salvagewallet` is removed. Additionally, the automatic salvage that is done if the wallet file fails to load is removed.
Lastly the salvage code entirely is moved out entirely into `bitcoin-wallet` from `walletdb.{cpp/h}` and `db.{cpp/h}`.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 84ae0578b6c68dda145ca65fef510ce0fdac0d7b feedback taken, and compared to my previous review, the bitcoin-wallet salvage command now seems to run and it exits without raising. The new test passes at both 9454105 and 84ae057 so as a sanity check I'd agree there is room for improvement, if possible.
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 84ae0578b6 🏉
Empact:
Code Review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18918/commits/84ae0578b6c68dda145ca65fef510ce0fdac0d7b
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 84ae0578b6c68dda145ca65fef510ce0fdac0d7b. Lot of small changes since previous review: added verify step before salvage, added basic test in new commit, removed unused scanstate variable and warnings parameter, tweaked various comments and strings, moved fsuccess variable declaration
meshcollider:
Concept / light code review ACK 84ae0578b6c68dda145ca65fef510ce0fdac0d7b
Tree-SHA512: 05be116b56ecade1c58faca1728c8fe4b78f0a082dbc2544a3f7507dd155f1f4f39070bd1fe90053444384337bc48b97149df5c1010230d78f8ecc08e69d93af
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18982#pullrequestreview-416974841
|
|
Remove the memonly bool and follow the Add and Load pattern we use
everywhere else.
|
|
atomic bool
|
|
remove nLastResend because it's unnecessary now that rebroadcasts always happen at least 12 hours later
|
