| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Rather than 3 different messages that are confusing / leak
implementation details, use a single message, that is similar to other
wallet related messages. i.e:
"Compiled without sqlite support (required for descriptor wallets)".
|
|
|
|
ae9d26a8f0435e2f4b39ad1181473e6575ac67b5 wallet: Fix already-loading error message grammar (Fotis Koutoupas)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK ae9d26a8f0435e2f4b39ad1181473e6575ac67b5
prayank23:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21040/commits/ae9d26a8f0435e2f4b39ad1181473e6575ac67b5
Tree-SHA512: 2f58d309dd33954f47e3ed339887b11bfdad4519f89ed3dd9bf3fb0db246d78b89653d553d02350ec84ce68bbb904db9fac00a2aad8d37f48df694d6782f35df
|
|
ebc4ab721b0371c0ef217c0f5bd7d42613e951e6 refactor: post Optional<> removal cleanups (fanquake)
57e980d13ca488031bde6ef197cf34d493d36796 scripted-diff: remove Optional & nullopt (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Same rationale & motivation as #21404, which turned out to be quite low in the number of potential conflicts. Lets see what the bot has to say here.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK ebc4ab721b0371c0ef217c0f5bd7d42613e951e6: patch looks correct
jnewbery:
utACK ebc4ab721b0371c0ef217c0f5bd7d42613e951e6
laanwj:
Code review ACK ebc4ab721b0371c0ef217c0f5bd7d42613e951e6
Tree-SHA512: 550fbeef09b9d35ddefaa805d1755c18c8fd499c4b0f77ebfece8c20296a7abd1cf6c699e2261f92fe3552deeb7555ec2a2287ffe3ab9e98bb9f8612a4d43be3
|
|
|
|
selection
f9cd2bfbccb7a2b8ff07cec5f6d2adbeca5f07c3 Rename CoinSelectionParams::effective_fee to m_effective_feerate (Andrew Chow)
bdd0c2934b7f389ffcfae3b602ee3ecee8581acd wallet: Move discard feerate fetching to CreateTransaction (Andrew Chow)
448d04b931f86941903e855f831249ff5ec77485 wallet: Move long term feerate setting to CreateTransaction (Andrew Chow)
e2f429e6bbf7098f278c0247b954ecd3ba53cf37 wallet: Replace nFeeRateNeeded with effective_fee (Andrew Chow)
1a6a0b0dfb90f9ebd4b86d7934c6aa5594974f5f wallet: Use existing feerate instead of getting a new one (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
During coin selection, there are various places where we need to have a feerate. We need the feerate for the transaction itself, the discard fee rate, and long term feerate. Fetching these each time we need them can lead to a race condition where two feerates that should be the same are actually different. One particular instance where this can happen is during the loop in `CreateTransactionInternal`. After inputs are chosen, the expected transaction fee is calculated using a newly fetched feerate. If `pick_new_inputs == false`, the loop will go again with the assumption that the fee for the transaction remains the same. However because the feerate is fetched again, it is possible that it actually isn't and this causes coin selection to fail.
Instead of fetching the feerate each time it is needed, we fetch them all at once at the top of `CreateTransactionInternal`, store them in `CoinSelectionParams`, and use them where needed.
While some of these fee rates probably don't need this caching, I've done it for consistency and the guarantee that they remain the same.
Fixes #19229
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/f9cd2bfbccb7a2b8ff07cec5f6d2adbeca5f07c3
fjahr:
Code review re-ACK f9cd2bfbccb7a2b8ff07cec5f6d2adbeca5f07c3
Xekyo:
tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21083/commits/f9cd2bfbccb7a2b8ff07cec5f6d2adbeca5f07c3
meshcollider:
Code review + test run ACK f9cd2bfbccb7a2b8ff07cec5f6d2adbeca5f07c3
Tree-SHA512: be83ff64ba473c3cdd3469c812e214659b6e2a9584c22ed2b1595618fce0d4b35d0901e61068cd1069fc1a8fb911db01dd7312d05c3b8cbafbe2504ab7a3e863
|
|
It's a feerate, not a fee. Also follow the style guide for member names.
|
|
Instead of fetching the discard feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, fetch and cache it once during CreateTransaction so that it
is shared for each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_discard_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
|
|
Instead of setting the long term feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, set it once during CreateTransaction and let it be shared
with each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_long_term_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
|
|
Make sure that all fee calculations use the same feerate.
coin_selection_params.effective_fee is the variable we use for all fee
calculations, so get rid of remaining nFeeRateNeeded usages and just
directly set coin_selection_params.effective_fee.
Does not change behavior.
|
|
During each loop of CreateTransaction, instead of constantly getting a
new feerate, use the feerate that we have already fetched for all
fee calculations. Thix fixes a race condition where the feerate required
changes during each iteration of the loop.
This commit changes behavior as the "Fee estimation failed" error will
now take priority over "Signing transaction failed".
|
|
block information for transactions
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git rm src/optional.h
sed -i -e 's/Optional</std::optional</g' $(git grep -l 'Optional<' src)
sed -i -e 's/{nullopt}/{std::nullopt}/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e 's/ nullopt;/ std::nullopt;/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e 's/ nullopt)/ std::nullopt)/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e 's/(nullopt)/(std::nullopt)/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e 's/ nullopt,/ std::nullopt,/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e 's/? nullopt :/? std::nullopt :/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e 's/: nullopt}/: std::nullopt}/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e '/optional.h \\/d' src/Makefile.am
sed -i -e '/#include <optional.h>/d' src/test/fuzz/autofile.cpp src/test/fuzz/buffered_file.cpp src/test/fuzz/node_eviction.cpp
sed -i -e 's/#include <optional.h>/#include <optional>/g' $(git grep -l '#include <optional.h>' src)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
fa4e088cbac035b8029a10b492849540150d0622 wallet: Mark replaced tx to not be in the mempool anymore (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The wallet does not mark the replaced tx as out-of-mempool. This causes failures in user scripts, because later RPCs may depend on this state change from `bumpfee`.
For example, the following might fail on current master:
```
txid = sendtoaddress(...)
bumpfee(txid)
abandontransaction(txid) # fails because txid is still marked as "in mempool"
```
Fixes #18831
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK fa4e088cbac035b8029a10b492849540150d0622
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa4e088cbac035b8029a10b492849540150d0622, and previous ACK faeedff5c87091fd83d2fb2b29eb49c948363f29 is also still valid in case there's a preference for the original fix
Tree-SHA512: 9858f40f5fb5a43a7b584b5c4268b6befa82e6a84583be5206fe721bcb6c255e8d35479d347d0b9aed72703df49887c02b14ab680e8efdd28b90dd6b93d9439a
|
|
will end up being too large after signing
48a0319babb409cf486a9eb7c776810f70b06cb2 Add a test that selects too large if BnB is used (Andrew Chow)
3e69939b78d0143d514c5d9b6c6a9844c9bb901c Fail if maximum weight is too large (Andrew Chow)
51e2cd322cfc7271af309e3a2243448a2ec0cad4 Have CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize also compute tx weight (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the `Transaction too large` is calculated on the transaction that is returned from `CreateTransaction`. This does not make sense for when `CreateTransaction` is being used for `fundrawtransaction` as no signing occurs so the final returned transaction is missing signatures. Thus users may successfully fund a transaction but fail to broadcast it after it has been fully signed.
So instead we should figure out whether the transaction we are funding will be too large after it is signed. We can do this by having `CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize` also return the transaction weight and then comparing that weight against the maximum weight.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20536/commits/48a0319babb409cf486a9eb7c776810f70b06cb2
meshcollider:
utACK 48a0319babb409cf486a9eb7c776810f70b06cb2
Xekyo:
utACK with nits 48a0319babb409cf486a9eb7c776810f70b06cb2
Tree-SHA512: 1700c60b07f67e2d5c591c5ccd131ac9f1861fab3def961c3c9c4b3281ec1063fe8e4f0f7f1038cac72692340856406bcee8fb45c8104d2ad34357a0ec878ac7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eligibility on grouping
5d4597666d589e39354e0d8dd5b2afbe1a5d7d8e Rewrite OutputGroups to be clearer and to use scriptPubKeys (Andrew Chow)
f6b305273910db0e46798d361413a7e878cb45f7 Explicitly filter out partial groups when we don't want them (Andrew Chow)
416d74fb1687ae1d47a58c153d09d9afe0b6dc60 Move OutputGroup positive only filtering into Insert (Andrew Chow)
d895e98b594b873f3d34c8ba63e9b55125d51b5a Move EligibleForSpending into GroupOutputs (Andrew Chow)
99b399aba5d27476b61b4865cc39553d03965d57 Move fee setting of OutputGroup to Insert (Andrew Chow)
6148a8acda5e594bb9b3b2d989056f9e03ddbdbd Move GroupOutputs into SelectCoinsMinConf (Andrew Chow)
2acad036575ec998f8bbe4f10f6206b1c8ad3d23 Remove OutputGroup non-default constructors (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Even after #17458, we still deal with setting fees of an `OutputGroup` and filtering the `OutputGroup` outside of the struct. We currently make all of the `OutputGroup`s in `SelectCoins` and then copy and modify them within each `SelectCoinsMinConf` scenario. This PR changes this to constructing the `OutputGroup`s within the `SelectCoinsMinConf` so that the scenario can be taken into account during the group construction. Furthermore, setting of fees and filtering for effective value is moved into `OutputGroup::Insert` itself so that we don't add undesirable outputs to an `OutputGroup` rather than deleting them afterwards.
To facilitate fee calculation and effective value filtering during `OutputGroup::Insert`, `OutputGroup` now takes the feerates in its constructor and computes the fees and effective value for each output during `Insert`.
While removing `OutputGroup`s in accordance with the `CoinEligibilityFilter` still requires creating the `OutputGroup`s first, we can do that within the function that makes them - `GroupOutput`s.
ACKs for top commit:
Xekyo:
Code review ACK: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20040/commits/5d4597666d589e39354e0d8dd5b2afbe1a5d7d8e
fjahr:
Code review ACK 5d4597666d589e39354e0d8dd5b2afbe1a5d7d8e
meshcollider:
Light utACK 5d4597666d589e39354e0d8dd5b2afbe1a5d7d8e
Tree-SHA512: 35965b6d49a87f4ebb366ec4f00aafaaf78e9282481ae2c9682b515a3a9f2cbcd3cd6e202fee29489d48fe7f3a7cede4270796f5e72bbaff76da647138fb3059
|
|
This adds better test coverage and will make it easier in #20744 to remove our dependency on the two-argument boost::filesystem::absolute() function which does not have a direct equivalent in C++17.
|
|
faa8f68943615785a2855676cf96e0e96f3cc6bd Replace boost::variant with std::variant (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Now that we can use std::variant from the vanilla standard library, drop the third-party boost variant dependency
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK faa8f68943615785a2855676cf96e0e96f3cc6bd
fanquake:
ACK faa8f68943615785a2855676cf96e0e96f3cc6bd
Tree-SHA512: 6e3aecd33b00c2e31a763f999247944d5b2ce5e3018f1965c516c1000cd08ff6703a8d50fb0be64883153da2925ae72986b8a6b96586db74057bd05d6f4986e6
|
|
const
31b136e5802e1b1e5f9a9589736afe0652f34da2 Don't declare de facto const reference variables as non-const (practicalswift)
1c65c075ee4c7f98d9c1fac5ed7576b96374d4e9 Don't declare de facto const member functions as non-const (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
_Meta: This is the second and final part of the `const` refactoring series (part one: #20581). **I promise: no more refactoring PRs from me in a while! :)** I'll now go back to focusing on fuzzing/hardening!_
Changes in this PR:
* Don't declare de facto const member functions as non-const
* Don't declare de facto const reference variables as non-const
Awards for finding candidates for the above changes go to:
* `clang-tidy`'s [`readability-make-member-function-const`](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/readability-make-member-function-const.html) check ([list of `clang-tidy` checks](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/list.html))
* `cppcheck`'s `constVariable` check ([list of `cppcheck` checks](https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/wiki/ListOfChecks/))
See #18920 for instructions on how to analyse Bitcoin Core using Clang Static Analysis, `clang-tidy` and `cppcheck`.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 31b136e5802e1b1e5f9a9589736afe0652f34da2
jonatack:
ACK 31b136e5802e1b1e5f9a9589736afe0652f34da2
theStack:
ACK 31b136e5802e1b1e5f9a9589736afe0652f34da2 :snowflake:
Tree-SHA512: f58f8f00744219426874379e9f3e9331132b9b48e954d24f3a85cbb858fdcc98009ed42ef7e7b4619ae8af9fc240a6d8bfc1c438db2e97b0ecd722a80dcfeffe
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only use was to work around a compiler warning in an ancient
compiler, which we no longer support.
|
|
cc3044ccdbefa9fae58d1762477e377883b39c5e fix misleading comment about call to non-existing function (pox)
Pull request description:
The comment seems to be describing the subsequent call to `SyncTransaction` but refers to it as `SyncNotifications`, which is not any function currently in the codebase.
It's best to just remove the "what" aspect of the comment and focus on the "why", which also reduces the risk of similar documentation errors in the future, in case the function ever gets renamed, for example.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK cc3044ccdbefa9fae58d1762477e377883b39c5e
Tree-SHA512: 882ff17836ef585a603dc504f3dd21f56f682e49b28a0998f23fd16025826fbb083b7978db3ee70d0e0ff2c86fd6c3fd99a2361e5d45c765fdc5822c5f14c0a7
|
|
fac39c198324715565897f4240709340477af0bf wallet: document that tx in CreateTransaction is purely an out-param (MarcoFalke)
faac31521bb7ecbf999541cf918d3750ff589de4 Remove unused and confusing CTransaction constructor (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The constructor is confusing and dangerous (as explained in the TODO), fix that by removing it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fac39c198324715565897f4240709340477af0bf
promag:
Code review ACK fac39c198324715565897f4240709340477af0bf.
theStack:
Code review ACK fac39c198324715565897f4240709340477af0bf
Tree-SHA512: e0c8cffce8d8ee0166b8e1cbfe85ed0657611e26e2af0d69fde70eceaa5d75cbde3eb489af0428fe4fc431360b4c791fb1cc21b8dee7d4c7a4f17df00836229d
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rewrite OutputGroups so that the logic is easier to follow and
understand.
There is a slight behavior change as OutputGroups will be grouped by
scriptPubKey rather than CTxDestination as before. This should have no
effect on users as all addresses are a CTxDestination. However by using
scriptPubKeys, we can correctly group outputs which fall into the
NoDestination case. But we also shouldn't have any NoDestination
outputs.
|
|
|
|
This just drops three interfaces::Chain methods replacing them with other calls.
Motivation for removing these chain methods:
- Need to get rid of findFirstBlockWithTimeAndHeight for #10102, which doesn't
support overloaded methods
- Followup from
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16426#discussion_r412487403
- phantomcircuit comments about findNextBlock test
http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-06-06.html#l-214
Behavior is not changing in any way here. A TODO comment in
ScanForWalletTransactions was removed, but just because it was invalid (see
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19195#discussion_r448020762), not
because it was implemented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91 refactor: Assert before dereference in CWallet::GetDatabase (João Barbosa)
021feb3187b207d511561c1f0ffd7f9e5e0c9c1d refactor: Drop redudant CWallet::GetDBHandle (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK 9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91
meshcollider:
utACK 9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91. Changes since last review: rebasing due to conflict, dropping wallet path commit c6a5cd7a64c78b162f545a3467d0fea7dcaadfcc as suggested in discussion, making GetDatabase() const in the earlier commit. Giving more descriptive title like
Tree-SHA512: 68cf3b5e9fe0acb3a5cd081086629989f213f1904cc344e5775767b56759a7d905b1e1c303afbe40f172ff81bf07f3719b59d8f6ec2de3fdd53cd0e2d220fb25
|
|
Our max weight check in CreateTransaction only worked if the transaction
was fully signed. However if we are funding a transaction, it is
possible that the tx weight will be too large for a standard tx. In that
case, we should also fail. So we use the tx weight returned by
CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize and check against the limit for those
transactions.
|
|
|
|
3eb6f8b2e61c24a22ea9396d86672307845f35eb wallet (not for backport): improve upgradewallet error messages (Jon Atack)
ca8cd893bb56bf5d455154b0498b1f58f77d20ed wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet error responses (Jon Atack)
99d56e357159c7154f69f28cb5587c5ca20d6594 wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet result responses (Jon Atack)
2498b04ce88696a3216fc38b7d393906b733e8b1 Don't upgrade to HD split if it is already supported (Andrew Chow)
c46c18b788cb0862aafbb116fd37936cbed6a431 wallet: refactor GetClosestWalletFeature() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This follows up on #18836 and #20282 to fix and improve the as-yet unreleased `upgradewallet` feature and also implement review follow-up in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18836#discussion_r519328607.
This PR fixes 4 upgradewallet issues:
- this bug: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20403#discussion_r526063920
- it returns nothing in the absence of an RPC error, which isn't reassuring for users
- it returns the same thing both in the case of a successful upgrade and when no upgrade took place
- the error message object is currently dead code
This PR fixes the above and provides:
...user feedback to not silently return without upgrading
```
{
"wallet_name": "disable private keys",
"previous_version": 169900,
"current_version": 169900,
"result": "Already at latest version. Wallet version unchanged."
}
```
...better feedback after successfully upgrading
```
{
"wallet_name": "watch-only",
"previous_version": 159900,
"current_version": 169900,
"result": "Wallet upgraded successfully from version 159900 to version 169900."
}
```
...helpful error responses
```
{
"wallet_name": "blank",
"previous_version": 169900,
"current_version": 169900,
"error": "Cannot downgrade wallet from version 169900 to version 159900. Wallet version unchanged."
}
{
"wallet_name": "blank",
"previous_version": 130000,
"current_version": 130000,
"error": "Cannot upgrade a non HD split wallet from version 130000 to version 169899 without upgrading to support pre-split keypool. Please use version 169900 or no version specified."
}
```
updated help:
```
upgradewallet ( version )
Upgrade the wallet. Upgrades to the latest version if no version number is specified.
New keys may be generated and a new wallet backup will need to be made.
Arguments:
1. version (numeric, optional, default=169900) The version number to upgrade to. Default is the latest wallet version.
Result:
{ (json object)
"wallet_name" : "str", (string) Name of wallet this operation was performed on
"previous_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet before this operation
"current_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet after this operation
"result" : "str", (string, optional) Description of result, if no error
"error" : "str" (string, optional) Error message (if there is one)
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3eb6f8b
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 3eb6f8b2e61c24a22ea9396d86672307845f35eb 🛡
Tree-SHA512: b767314069e26b5933b123acfea6aa40708507f504bdb22884da020a4ca1332af38a7072b061e36281533af9f4e236d94d3c129daf6fe5b55241127537038eed
|
|
|
|
05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b wallet: override minfee checks (fOverrideFeeRate) for fee_rate (Jon Atack)
9a670b4f07a6140de809d73cbd7f3e614eb6ea74 wallet: update sendtoaddress, send RPC examples with fee_rate (Jon Atack)
be481b72e24fb6834bd674cd8daee67c6938b42d wallet: use MIN_RELAY_TX_FEE in bumpfee help (Jon Atack)
449b730579566459e350703611629e63e54657ed wallet: provide valid values if invalid estimate mode passed (Jon Atack)
6da3afbaee5809ebf6d88efaa3958c505c2d71c7 wallet: update remaining rpcwallet fee rate units to BTC/kvB (Jon Atack)
173b5b5fe07d45be5a1e5bc7a5df996f20ab1e85 wallet: update fee rate units, use sat/vB for fee_rate error messages (Jon Atack)
7f9835a05abf3e168ad93e7195cbaa4bf61b9b07 wallet: remove fee rates from conf_target helps (Jon Atack)
b7994c01e9a3251536fe6538a22f614774eec82d wallet: add fee_rate unit warnings to bumpfee (Jon Atack)
410e471fa42d3db04e8879c71f8c824dcc151a83 wallet: remove redundant bumpfee fee_rate checks (Jon Atack)
a0d495747320c79b27a83c216dcc526ac8df8f24 wallet: introduce fee_rate (sat/vB) param/option (Jon Atack)
e21212f01b7c41eba13b0479b252053cf482bc1f wallet: remove unneeded WALLET_BTC_KB_TO_SAT_B constant (Jon Atack)
6112cf20d43b0be34fe0edce2ac3e6b27cae1bbe wallet: add CFeeRate ctor doxygen documentation (Jon Atack)
3f7279161347543ce4e997d78ea89a4043491145 wallet: fix bug in RPC send options (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #11413 and #20220 to address #19543.
- replace overloading the conf_target and estimate_mode params with `fee_rate` in sat/vB in the sendtoaddress, sendmany, send, fundrawtransaction, walletcreatefundedpsbt, and bumpfee RPCs
- allow non-actionable conf_target value of `0` and estimate_mode value of `""` to be passed to use `fee_rate` as a positional argument, in addition to as a named argument
- fix a bug in the experimental send RPC described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20220#discussion_r513789526 where args were not being passed correctly into the options values
- update the feerate error message units for these RPCs from BTC/kB to sat/vB
- update the test coverage, help docs, doxygen docs, and some of the RPC examples
- other changes to address the excellent review feedback
See this wallet meeting log for more context: http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-11-06.html#l-309
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 05e82d8
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 05e82d86b0 did not test and found a few style nits, which can be fixed later 🍯
Xekyo:
tACK 05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b
Sjors:
utACK 05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b
Tree-SHA512: a4ee5f184ada53f1840b2923d25873bda88c5a2ae48e67eeea2417a0b35154798cfdb3c147b05dd56bd6608a784e1b91623bb985ee2ab9ef2baaec22206d0a9c
|
|
963696288955dc31b3a4fd136bfb791a9d99755b [upgradewallet] removed unused warning param (Sishir Giri)
Pull request description:
The `warning` variable was unused in `upgradewallet` so I removed it
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 963696288955dc31b3a4fd136bfb791a9d99755b: diff looks correct
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 963696288955dc31b3a4fd136bfb791a9d99755b
jonatack:
ACK 963696288955dc31b3a4fd136bfb791a9d99755b
Tree-SHA512: 1d63186ce1e05e86a778340f2d7986c2cee1523de0a11cea39e8d148ac7ee26c49741dfa302b5c1cd1c8d74e67c1f9baee2763720c2d850b57da9a3fdce24565
|
|
|
|
5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab wallet: Remove -upgradewallet from dummywallet (MarcoFalke)
a314271f08215feba53ead27096ac7fda34acb3c test: Remove unused wallet.dat (MarcoFalke)
bf7635963c03203e7189ddaa56c6b086a0108cbf tests: Test specific upgradewallet scenarios and that upgrades work (Andrew Chow)
4b418a9decc3e855ee4b0bbf9e61121c8e9904e5 test: Add test_framework/bdb.py module for inspecting bdb files (Andrew Chow)
092fc434854f881330771a93a1280ac67b1d3549 tests: Add a sha256sum_file function to util (Andrew Chow)
0bd995aa19be65b0dd23df1df571c71428c2bc32 wallet: upgrade the CHDChain version number when upgrading to split hd (Andrew Chow)
8e32e1c41c995e832e643f605d35a7aa112837e6 wallet: remove nWalletMaxVersion (Andrew Chow)
bd7398cc6258c258e9f4411c50630ec4a552341b wallet: have ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade check against the new version (Andrew Chow)
5f720544f34dedf75b063b962845fa8eca604514 wallet: Add GetClosestWalletFeature function (Andrew Chow)
842ae3842df489f1b8d68e67a234788966218184 wallet: Add utility method for CanSupportFeature (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR cleans up the wallet upgrade mechanism a bit, fixes some probably bugs, and adds more test cases.
The `nWalletMaxVersion` member variable has been removed as it made `CanSupportFeature` unintuitive and was causing a couple of bugs. The reason this was introduced originally was to allow a wallet upgrade to only occur when the new feature is first used. While this makes sense for the old `-upgradewallet` option, for an RPC, this does not quite make sense. It's more intuitive for an upgrade to occur if possible if the `upgradewallet` RPC is used as that's an explicit request to upgrade a particular wallet to a newer version. `nWalletMaxVersion` was only relevant for upgrades to `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` and `FEATURE_COMPRPUBKEY` both of which are incredibly old features. So for such wallets, the behavior of `upgradewallet` will be that the feature is enabled immediately without the wallet needing to be encrypted at that time (note that `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` indicates support for encryption, not that the wallet is encrypted) or for a new key to be generated.
`CanSupportFeature` would previously indicate whether we could upgrade to `nWalletMaxVersion` not just whether the current wallet version supported a feature. While this property was being used to determine whether we should upgrade to HD and HD chain split, it was also causing a few bugs. Determining whether we should upgrade to HD or HD chain split is resolved by passing into `ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade` the version we are upgrading to and checking against that. By removing `nWalletMaxVersion` we also fix a bug where you could upgrade to HD chain split without the pre-split keypool.
`nWalletMaxVersion` was also the version that was being reported by `getwalletinfo` which meant that the version reported was not always consistent across restarts as it depended on whether `upgradewallet` was used. Additionally to make the wallet versions consistent with actually supported versions, instead of just setting the wallet version to whatever is given to `upgradewallet`, we normalize the version number to the closest supported version number. For example, if given 150000, we would store and report 139900.
Another bug where CHDChain was not being upgraded to the version supporting HD chain split is also fixed by this PR.
Lastly several more tests have been added. Some refactoring to the test was made to make these tests easier. These tests check specific upgrading scenarios, such as from non-HD (version 60000) to HD to pre-split keypool. Although not specifically related to `upgradewallet`, `UpgradeKeyMetadata` is now being tested too.
Part of the new tests is checking that the wallet files are identical before and after failed upgrades. To facilitate this, a utility function `sha256sum_file` has been added. Another part of the tests is to examine the wallet file itself to ensure that the records in the wallet.dat file have been correctly modified. So a new `bdb.py` module has been added to deserialize the BDB db of the wallet.dat file. This format isn't explicitly documented anywhere, but the code and comments in BDB's source code in file `dbinc/db_page.h` describe it. This module just dumps all of the fields into a dict.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
approach ACK 5f9c0b6360
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab
jonatack:
ACK 5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab, approach seems fine, code review, only skimmed the test changes but they look well done, rebased on current master, debug built and verified the `wallet_upgradewallet.py` test runs green both before and after running `test/get_previous_releases.py -b v0.19.1 v0.18.1 v0.17.2 v0.16.3 v0.15.2`
Tree-SHA512: 7c4ebf420850d596a586cb6dd7f2ef39c6477847d12d105fcd362abb07f2a8aa4f7afc5bfd36cbc8b8c72fcdd1de8d2d3f16ad8e8ba736b6f4f31f133fe5feba
|
|
|
