Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Move isminetype and isminefilter there this commit, add WalletPurpose type next
commit.
|
|
selected coins
68eed5df8656bed1be6526b014e58d3123102b03 test,gui: add coverage for PSBT creation on legacy watch-only wallets (furszy)
306aab5bb471904faed325d9f3b38b7e891c7bbb test,gui: decouple widgets and model into a MiniGui struct (furszy)
2f76ac0383904123676f1b4eeba0f772a4c5cb5d test,gui: decouple chain and wallet initialization from test case (furszy)
cd98b717398f7b13ace91ea9efac9ce1e60b4d62 gui: 'getAvailableBalance', include watch only balance (furszy)
74eac3a82fc948467d5a15a5af420b36ce8eb04a test: add coverage for 'useAvailableBalance' functionality (furszy)
dc1cc1c35995dc09085b3d9270c445b7923fdb51 gui: bugfix, getAvailableBalance skips selected coins (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/688 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26687.
First Issue Description (https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/688):
The previous behavior for `getAvailableBalance`, when the coin control had selected coins, was to return the sum of them. Instead, we are currently returning the wallet's available total balance minus the selected coins total amount.
Reason:
Missed to update the `GetAvailableBalance` function to include the coin control selected coins on #25685.
Context:
Since #25685 we skip the selected coins inside `AvailableCoins`, the reason is that there is no need to waste resources walking through the entire wallet's txes map just to get coins that could have gotten by just doing a simple `mapWallet.find`).
Places Where This Generates Issues (only when the user manually select coins via coin control):
1) The GUI balance check prior the transaction creation process.
2) The GUI "useAvailableBalance" functionality.
Note 1:
As the GUI uses a balance cache since https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/598, this issue does not affect the regular spending process. Only arises when the user manually select coins.
Note 2:
Added test coverage for the `useAvailableBalance` functionality.
----------------------------------
Second Issue Description (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26687):
As we are using a cached balance on `WalletModel::getAvailableBalance`,
the function needs to include the watch-only available balance for wallets
with private keys disabled.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK 68eed5df8656bed1be6526b014e58d3123102b03
achow101:
ACK 68eed5df8656bed1be6526b014e58d3123102b03
theStack:
ACK 68eed5df8656bed1be6526b014e58d3123102b03
Tree-SHA512: 674f3e050024dabda2ff4a04b9ed3750cf54a040527204c920e1e38bd3d7f5fd4d096e4fd08a0fea84ee6abb5070f022b5c0d450c58fd30202ef05ebfd7af6d3
|
|
The previous behavior for getAvailableBalance when coin control
has selected coins was to return the sum of them. Instead, we
are currently returning the wallet's available total balance minus
the selected coins total amount.
This turns into a GUI-only issue for the "use available balance"
button when the user manually select coins in the send screen.
Reason:
We missed to update the GetAvailableBalance function to include
the coin control selected coins on #25685.
Context:
Since #25685 we skip the selected coins inside `AvailableCoins`,
the reason is that there is no need to traverse the wallet's
txes map just to get coins that can directly be fetched by
their id.
|
|
The fs.* files are already part of the libbitcoin_util library. With the
introduction of the fs_helpers.* it makes sense to move fs.* into the
util/ directory as well.
|
|
Optimizes coin selection by performing the "group outputs"
procedure only once, outside the "attempt selection" process.
Avoiding the repeated execution of the 'GroupOutputs' operation
that occurs on each coin eligibility filters (up to 8 of them);
then for every coin vector type plus one for all the coins together.
This also let us not perform coin selection over coin eligibility
filtered groups that don't add new elements.
(because, if the previous round failed, and the subsequent one has
the same coins, then this new round will fail again).
|
|
The 'GroupOutputs()' function performs the same
calculations for only-positive and mixed groups,
the only difference is that when we look for
only-positive groups, we discard negative utxos.
So, instead of wasting resources calling GroupOutputs()
for positive-only first, then call it again to include
the negative ones in the result, we can execute
GroupOutputs() only once, including in the response
both group types (positive-only and mixed).
|
|
No functional changes. Only cosmetic changes to simplify the follow-up commit.
|
|
Initial steps towards sharing COutput instances across all possible
OutputGroups (instead of copying them time after time).
|
|
The following scenarios are covered:
1) 10 UTXO with the same script:
partial spends is enabled --> outputs must not be grouped.
2) 10 UTXO with the same script:
partial spends disabled --> outputs must be grouped.
3) 20 UTXO, 10 one from scriptA + 10 from scriptB:
a) if partial spends is enabled --> outputs must not be grouped.
b) if partial spends is not enabled --> 2 output groups expected (one per script).
3) Try to add a negative output (value - fee < 0):
a) if "positive_only" is enabled --> negative output must be skipped.
b) if "positive_only" is disabled --> negative output must be added.
4) Try to add a non-eligible UTXO (due not fulfilling the min depth target for
"not mine" UTXOs) --> it must not be added to any group
5) Try to add a non-eligible UTXO (due not fulfilling the min depth target for
"mine" UTXOs) --> it must not be added to any group
6) Surpass the 'OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES' size and verify that a second partial
group gets created.
|
|
And not hide it inside the `OutputGroup::Insert` method.
This method does not return anything if insertion fails.
We can know before calling `Insert` whether the coin
will be accepted or not.
|
|
helper, dedupe add_coin
4275195606e6f42466d9a8ef766b3035833df4d5 De-duplicate add_coin methods to a test util helper (Jon Atack)
9d92c3d7f42c18939a9a6aa1ee185f1c958360a0 Create InsecureRandMoneyAmount() test util helper (Jon Atack)
81f5ade2a324167c03c5ce765a26bd42ed652723 Move random test util code from setup_common to random (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
- Move random test utilities from `setup_common` to a new `random` file, as many tests don't use this code.
- Create a helper to generate semi-random CAmounts up to `MONEY_RANGE` rather than only uint32, and use the helper in the unit tests.
- De-duplicate a shared `add_coin` method by extracting it to a `coins` test utility.
ACKs for top commit:
pinheadmz:
ACK 4275195606e6f42466d9a8ef766b3035833df4d5
achow101:
ACK 4275195606e6f42466d9a8ef766b3035833df4d5
john-moffett:
ACK 4275195606e6f42466d9a8ef766b3035833df4d5
Tree-SHA512: 3ed974251149c7417f935ef2f8865aa0dcc33b281b47522b0f96f1979dff94bb8527957f098fe4d210f40d715c00f29512f2ffe189097102229023b7284a3a27
|
|
dependency
52f4d567d69425dfd514489079db80483024a80d refactor: remove <util/system.h> include from wallet.h (furszy)
6c9b342c306b9e17024762c4ba8f1c64e9810ee2 refactor: wallet, remove global 'ArgsManager' access (furszy)
d8f5fc446216258a68e256076c889ec23471855f wallet: set '-walletnotify' script instead of access global args manager (furszy)
3477a28dd3b4bc6c1993554c5ce589d69fa86070 wallet: set keypool_size instead of access global args manager (furszy)
Pull request description:
Structurally, the wallet class shouldn't access the global `ArgsManager` class, its internal behavior shouldn't be coupled to a global command line args parsing object.
So this PR migrates the only two places where we depend on it: (1) the keypool size, and (2) the "-walletnotify" script. And cleans up the, now unneeded, wallet `ArgsManager` ref member.
Extra note:
In the process of removing the args ref member, discovered and fixed files that were invalidly depending on the wallet header including `util/system.h`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 52f4d567d69425dfd514489079db80483024a80d
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 52f4d567d69425dfd514489079db80483024a80d
hebasto:
re-ACK 52f4d567d69425dfd514489079db80483024a80d
Tree-SHA512: 0cffd99b4dd4864bf618aa45aeaabbef2b6441d27b6dbb03489c4e013330877682ff17b418d07aa25fbe1040bdf2c67d7559bdeb84128c5437bf0e6247719016
|
|
we are not using it anymore
|
|
|
|
as many of the unit tests don't use this code
|
|
fb1c6c14c11ccd4833c1a24f77c507f098d369ad test: Remove redundant test (yancy)
Pull request description:
I can't think of any reason to keep this test case around labeled [fix me](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet/test/coinselector_tests.cpp#L242). The test was originally added [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/4566ab75f277612425337bf7786c1d3a410d894a) however there was never an assertion about the coins that should be selected, only that a solution is found (which is a redundant solution to the test [above](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet/test/coinselector_tests.cpp#L222)). The comment was later added here to [fix](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/384273260a6ccbcf79dade0830011f528e5a1581) it, however it's unclear what exactly it's testing. A test was later added [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet/test/coinselector_tests.cpp#L366) where if the [long term fee](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet/test/coinselector_tests.cpp#L357) is less than the current [fee](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet/test/coinselector_tests.cpp#L356), then select fewer UTXOs, which may have been the original intent.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
ACK fb1c6c14c11ccd4833c1a24f77c507f098d369ad
Zero-1729:
Concept ACK fb1c6c14c11ccd4833c1a24f77c507f098d369ad
achow101:
ACK fb1c6c14c11ccd4833c1a24f77c507f098d369ad
Tree-SHA512: bce2cdae669c144ffaa130237a1643e3b6728e13d603cebf5d9493c4c7c68b3635868e4d93d210783c2ded2a871f185ca09a2053168c05b26a1e056ff6edf68f
|
|
|
|
|
|
object with proper return codes
4aebd832a405090c2608e4b60bb4f34501bcea61 db: Change DatabaseCursor::Next to return status enum (Andrew Chow)
d79e8dcf2981ef1964a2fde8c472b5de1ca1c963 wallet: Have cursor users use DatabaseCursor directly (Andrew Chow)
7a198bba0a1d0a0f0fd4ca947955cb52b84bdd4b wallet: Introduce DatabaseCursor RAII class for managing cursor (Andrew Chow)
69efbc011bb74fcd8dd9ed2a8a5d31bc9e323c10 Move SafeDbt out of BerkeleyBatch (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Instead of having database cursors be tied to a particular `DatabaseBatch` object and requiring its setup and teardown be separate functions in that batch, we can have cursors be separate RAII classes. This makes it easier to create and destroy cursors as well as having cursors that have slightly different behaviors.
Additionally, since reading data from a cursor is a tri-state, this PR changes the return value of the `Next` function (formerly `ReadAtCursor`) to return an Enum rather than the current system of 2 booleans. This greatly simplifies and unifies the code that deals with cursors as now there is no confusion as to what the function returns when there are no records left to be read.
Extracted from #24914
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
diff ACK 4aebd83
theStack:
Code-review ACK 4aebd832a405090c2608e4b60bb4f34501bcea61
Tree-SHA512: 5d0be56a18de5b08c777dd5a73ba5a6ef1e696fdb07d1dca952a88ded07887b7c5c04342f9a76feb2f6fe24a45dc31f094f1f5d9500e6bdf4a44f4edb66dcaa1
|
|
clang-tidy check
9567bfeab95cc0932073641dd162903850987d43 clang-tidy: Add `performance-no-automatic-move` check (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Split from bitcoin/bitcoin#26642 as [requested](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26642#discussion_r1054673201).
For the problem description see https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/performance/no-automatic-move.html.
The following types are affected:
- `std::pair<CAddress, NodeSeconds>`
- `std::vector<CAddress>`
- `UniValue`, also see bitcoin/bitcoin#25429
- `QColor`
- `CBlock`
- `MempoolAcceptResult`
- `std::shared_ptr<CWallet>`
- `std::optional<SelectionResult>`
- `CTransactionRef`, which is `std::shared_ptr<const CTransaction>`
ACKs for top commit:
andrewtoth:
ACK 9567bfeab95cc0932073641dd162903850987d43
aureleoules:
ACK 9567bfeab95cc0932073641dd162903850987d43
Tree-SHA512: 9b6a5d539205b41d2c86402d384318ed2e1d89e66333ebd200a48fd7df3ce6f6c60a3e989eda5cc503fb34b8d82526f95e56776e1af51e63b49e3a1fef72dbcb
|
|
instead of c style casts
f2fc03ec856d7d19a20c482514350cced38f9504 refactor: use braced init for integer constants instead of c style casts (Pasta)
Pull request description:
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23810 for more context. This is broken out from that PR, as it is less breaking, and should be trivial to review and merge.
EDIT: Long term, the intention is to remove all C-style casts, as they can dangerously introduce reinterpret_casts. This is one step which removes a number of trivially removable C-style casts
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK f2fc03ec856d7d19a20c482514350cced38f9504
Tree-SHA512: 2fd11b92c9147e3f970ec3e130e3b3dce70e707ff02950a8c697d4b111ddcbbfa16915393db20cfc8f384bc76f13241c9b994a187987fcecd16a61f8cc0af14c
|
|
interface methods
55696a0ac30bcfbd555f71cbc8eac23b725f7dcf wallet: remove `mempool_sequence` from `transactionRemovedFromMempool` (w0xlt)
bf19069c53501231a2f3ba59afa067913ec4d3b2 wallet: remove `mempool_sequence` from `transactionAddedToMempool` (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR removes `mempool_sequence` from `transactionRemovedFromMempool` and `transactionAddedToMempool`.
`mempool_sequence` is not used in these methods, only in ZMQ notifications.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26752/commits/55696a0ac30bcfbd555f71cbc8eac23b725f7dcf
Tree-SHA512: 621e89230bcb6edfed83e2758601a2b093822fc2dc4e9bfb00487e340f2bc4c5ac3bf6df3ca00b7fe55bb3df15858820f2bf698f403d2e48b915dd9eb47b63e0
|
|
to make tests independent
b942c94d153f83b77ef5d603211252d9abadde95 test: Change coinselection parameter location to make tests independent (yancy)
Pull request description:
the `subtract_fee_outputs` param is expected to be `true` for all subsequent tests. It should be defined outside of a single test so that if it's removed or changed, all subsequent tests won't fail. Currently if you remove this [test](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet/test/coinselector_tests.cpp#L304:L325) the following [test](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet/test/coinselector_tests.cpp#L327:L345) fails. This change makes the tests independent.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b942c94d153f83b77ef5d603211252d9abadde95
aureleoules:
ACK b942c94d153f83b77ef5d603211252d9abadde95.
rajarshimaitra:
tACK b942c94d153f83b77ef5d603211252d9abadde95
theStack:
ACK b942c94d153f83b77ef5d603211252d9abadde95
Tree-SHA512: 461e19d15351318102ef9f96c68442365d8ca238c48ad7aefe23e8532b33b91dadf6c7840c7894574bccede6da162a55ad7a6f6a330d61a11ce804e68ddc5e9c
|
|
|
|
messages
76dc547ee7b05864e7b1b6c55fc0301d47aa3a15 gui: create tx, launch error dialog if backend throws runtime_error (furszy)
f4d79477ff0946b0bd340ade9251fa38e3b95dd7 wallet: coin selection, add duplicated inputs checks (furszy)
0aa065b14e67592d5be8f46ebbe5d59a083ff0a5 wallet: return accurate error messages from Coin Selection (furszy)
7e8340ab1a970a14e180b1fcf420b46a5657b062 wallet: make SelectCoins flow return util::Result (furszy)
e5e147fe97f706e82bc51358f8bdc355f355be57 wallet: refactor eight consecutive 'AttemptSelection' calls into a loop (furszy)
Pull request description:
Work decoupled from #25806, which cleanup and improves the Coin Selection flow further.
Adding the capability to propagate specific error messages from the Coin Selection process to the user.
Instead of always returning the general "Insufficient funds" message which is not always accurate to what happened internally.
Letting us instruct the user how to proceed under certain circumstances.
The following error messages were added:
1) If the selection result exceeds the maximum transaction weight,
we now will return:
-> "The inputs size exceeds the maximum weight. Please try sending
a smaller amount or manually consolidating your wallet's UTXOs".
2) If the user pre-selected inputs and disallowed the automatic coin
selection process (no other inputs are allowed), we now will
return:
-> "The preselected coins total amount does not cover the transaction
target. Please allow other inputs to be automatically selected or include
more coins manually".
3) The double-counted preset inputs during Coin Selection error will now
throw an "internal bug detected" message instead of crashing the node.
The essence of this work comes from several comments:
1. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26560#discussion_r1037395665
2. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25729#discussion_r940619491
3. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25269#pullrequestreview-1135240825
4. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23144 (which is connected to #24845)
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
crACK 76dc547ee7b05864e7b1b6c55fc0301d47aa3a15
achow101:
ACK 76dc547ee7b05864e7b1b6c55fc0301d47aa3a15
aureleoules:
ACK 76dc547ee7b05864e7b1b6c55fc0301d47aa3a15
theStack:
ACK 76dc547ee7b05864e7b1b6c55fc0301d47aa3a15 :city_sunrise:
Tree-SHA512: 9de30792d7a5849cae77747aa978e70390b66ee9d082779a56088a024f82e725b0af050e6603aece0ac8229f6d73bc471ba97b4ab69dc7eddf419f5f56ae89a5
|
|
coverage
9622fe64b8785430c71d4abc8637075026dc690c test: move coins result test to wallet_tests.cpp (furszy)
f69347d0588647ff9a4e986c7be987827a0417f4 test: extend and simplify availablecoins_tests (furszy)
212ccdf2c2b70d973b18ae78f0158ec5f0c3bbb4 wallet: AvailableCoins, add arg to include/skip locked coins (furszy)
Pull request description:
Negative PR with extended test coverage :).
1) Cleaned duplicated code and added coverage for the 'AvailableCoins' incremental result.
2) The class `AvailableCoinsTestingSetup` inside `availablecoins_tests.cpp` is a plain copy
of `ListCoinsTestingSetup` that is inside `wallet_tests.cpp`.
So, deleted the file and moved the `BasicOutputTypesTest` test case to `wallet_tests.cpp`.
3) Added arg to include/skip locked coins from the `AvailableCoins` result. This is needed for point (1) as otherwise the wallet will spend the coins that we recently created due its closeness to the recipient amount.
Note: this last point comes from #25659 where I'm using the same functionality to clean/speedup another flow as well.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9622fe64b8785430c71d4abc8637075026dc690c
theStack:
ACK 9622fe64b8785430c71d4abc8637075026dc690c
aureleoules:
reACK 9622fe64b8785430c71d4abc8637075026dc690c, nice cleanup!
Tree-SHA512: 1ed9133120bfe8815455d1ad317bb0ff96e11a0cc34ee8098716ab9b001749168fa649212b2fa14b330c1686cb1f29039ff1f88ae306db68881b0428c038f388
|
|
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/performance/no-automatic-move.html
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Commits of previous years:
- 2021: f47dda2c58b5d8d623e0e7ff4e74bc352dfa83d7
- 2020: fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
- 2019: aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
|
|
|
|
Next()'s result is a tri-state - failed, more to go, complete. Replace
the way that this is returned with an enum with values FAIL, MORE, and
DONE rather than with two booleans.
|
|
Instead of having the DatabaseBatch manage the cursor, having the
consumer handle it directly
|
|
Instead of having DatabaseBatch deal with opening and closing database
cursors, have a separate RAII class that deals with those.
For now, DatabaseBatch manages DatabaseCursor, but this will change
later.
|
|
The class `AvailableCoinsTestingSetup` inside `availablecoins_tests.cpp` is a plain copy
of `ListCoinsTestingSetup` that is inside wallet_tests.cpp.
|
|
Clean redundant code and add coverage for 'AvailableCoins' incremental result.
|
|
CoinSelection
c7c7ee9d0b2d7b303b9300f941e37e09e7d8d8b6 test: Check max transaction weight in CoinSelection (Aurèle Oulès)
6b563cae92957dc30dc35103a7c321fdb0115ef3 wallet: Check max tx weight in coin selector (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
This PR is an attempt to fix #5782.
I have added 4 test scenarios, 3 of them provided here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/5782#issuecomment-73819058 (slightly modified to use a segwit wallet).
Here are my benchmarks :
## PR
| ns/op | op/s | err% | ins/op | cyc/op | IPC | bra/op | miss% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 1,466,341.00 | 681.97 | 0.6% | 11,176,762.00 | 3,358,752.00 | 3.328 | 1,897,839.00 | 0.3% | 0.02 | `CoinSelection`
## Master
| ns/op | op/s | err% | ins/op | cyc/op | IPC | bra/op | miss% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 1,526,029.00 | 655.30 | 0.5% | 11,142,188.00 | 3,499,200.00 | 3.184 | 1,994,156.00 | 0.2% | 0.02 | `CoinSelection`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
reACK c7c7ee9d0b2d7b303b9300f941e37e09e7d8d8b6
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25729/commits/c7c7ee9d0b2d7b303b9300f941e37e09e7d8d8b6
furszy:
diff ACK c7c7ee9d
Tree-SHA512: ef0b28576ff845174651ba494aa9adee234c96e6f886d0e032eceb7050296e45b099dda0039d1dfb9944469f067627b2101f3ff855c70353cf39d1fc7ee81828
|
|
203886c443c4ad76f8a1dba740a286e383e55206 Fixup clang-tidy named argument comments (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Fix comments so they are checked/consistent.
Fix incorrect comments.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 203886c443c4ad76f8a1dba740a286e383e55206, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: e1257840f91fe39842e2b19299c1633604697b8584fe44b1977ada33cdde5433c877ed0b669fa334e20b04971dc89cd47d58b2783b6f7004521f01d05a1245da
|
|
Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <github@achow101.com>
|
|
total amount
7362f8e5e2497bc1ef27bfa871fc6dd306dd33c3 refactor: make CoinsResult total amounts members private (furszy)
3282fad59908da328f8323e1213344fe58ccf69e wallet: add assert to SelectionResult::Merge for safety (S3RK)
c4e3b7d6a154e82cdb902fd7bcb7b725aebde5ea wallet: SelectCoins, return early if wallet's UTXOs cannot cover the target (furszy)
cac2725fd0f5baeb741dfe079a87332784c2adc7 test: bugfix, coinselector_test, use 'CoinsResult::Erase/Add' instead of direct member access (furszy)
cf793846978a8783c23b66ba6b4f3f30e83ff3eb test: Coin Selection, duplicated preset inputs selection (furszy)
341ba7ffd8cdb56b4cde1f251768c3d2c2a9b4e9 test: wallet, coverage for CoinsResult::Erase function (furszy)
f930aefff9690a1e830d897d0a8c53f4219ae4a8 wallet: bugfix, 'CoinsResult::Erase' is erasing only one output of the set (furszy)
Pull request description:
This comes with #26559.
Solving few bugs inside the wallet's transaction creation
process and adding test coverage for them.
Plus, making use of the `CoinsResult::total_amount` cached value
inside the Coin Selection process to return early if we don't have
enough funds to cover the target amount.
### Bugs
1) The `CoinsResult::Erase` method removes only one
output from the available coins vector (there is a [loop break](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/c1061be14a515b0ed4f4d646fcd0378c62e6ded3/src/wallet/spend.cpp#L112)
that should have never been there) and not all the preset inputs.
Which on master is not a problem, because since [#25685](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25685)
we are no longer using the method. But, it's a bug on v24
(check [#26559](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26559)).
This method it's being fixed and not removed because I'm later using it to solve
another bug inside this PR.
2) As we update the total cached amount of the `CoinsResult` object inside
`AvailableCoins` and we don't use such function inside the coin selection
tests (we manually load up the `CoinsResult` object), there is a discrepancy
between the outputs that we add/erase and the total amount cached value.
### Improvements
* This makes use of the `CoinsResult` total amount field to early return
with an "Insufficient funds" error inside Coin Selection if the tx target
amount is greater than the sum of all the wallet available coins plus the
preset inputs amounts (we don't need to perform the entire coin selection
process if we already know that there aren't enough funds inside our wallet).
### Test Coverage
1) Adds test coverage for the duplicated preset input selection bug that we have in v24.
Where the wallet invalidly selects the preset inputs twice during the Coin Selection
process. Which ends up with a "good" Coin Selection result that does not cover the
total tx target amount. Which, alone, crashes the wallet due an insane fee.
But.. to make it worst, adding the subtract fee from output functionality
to this mix ends up with the wallet by-passing the "insane" fee assertion,
decreasing the output amount to fulfill the insane fee, and.. sadly,
broadcasting the tx to the network.
2) Adds test coverage for the `CoinsResult::Erase` method.
------------------------------------
TO DO:
* [ ] Update [#26559 ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26559) description.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7362f8e5e2497bc1ef27bfa871fc6dd306dd33c3
glozow:
ACK 7362f8e5e2497bc1ef27bfa871fc6dd306dd33c3, I assume there will be a followup PR to add coin selection sanity checks and we can discuss the best way to do that there.
josibake:
ACK [7362f8e](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26560/commits/7362f8e5e2497bc1ef27bfa871fc6dd306dd33c3)
Tree-SHA512: 37a6828ea10d8d36c8d5873ceede7c8bef72ae4c34bef21721fa9dad83ad6dba93711c3170a26ab6e05bdbc267bb17433da08ccb83b82956d05fb16090328cba
|
|
Fix comments so they are checked/consistent.
Fix incorrect arguments.
|
|
direct member access
Aside from the cleanup, this solves a bug in the following-up commit. Because, in these
tests, we are manually adding/erasing outputs from the CoinsResult object but never
updating the internal total amount field.
|
|
This exercises the bug inside CoinsResult::Erase that
ends up on (1) a wallet crash or (2) a created and
broadcasted tx that contains a reduced recipient's amount.
This is covered by making the wallet selects the preset
inputs twice during the coin selection process.
Making the wallet think that the selection process result covers
the entire tx target when it does not. It's actually creating
a tx that sends more coins than what inputs are covering for.
Which, combined with the SFFO option, makes the wallet
incorrectly reduce the recipient's amount by the difference
between the original target and the wrongly counted inputs.
Which means, a created and relayed tx sending less coins to
the destination than what the user inputted.
|
|
|
|
ScriptPubKeyMan
1b77db265317a6470d0914b520f04eb64b3c0942 test: add `ismine` test for descriptor scriptpubkeyman (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
Currently `src/wallet/test/ismine_tests.cpp` has tests for the legacy ScriptPubKeyMan only.
This PR adds tests for the descriptor ScriptPubKeyMan.
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
ACK 1b77db265317a6470d0914b520f04eb64b3c0942
achow101:
ACK 1b77db265317a6470d0914b520f04eb64b3c0942
furszy:
ACK 1b77db26 with a non-blocking comment.
Tree-SHA512: 977b5d1e71f9468331aeb4ebaf3708dd651f9f3018d4544a395b87ca6d7fb8bfa6d20acc1a4f6e096e240e81d30fb7a6e8add190e52536e7a3cb5a80f392883f
|
|
Adds test coverage for the wallet's crypted key loading from db process.
The following scenarios are covered:
1) "All ckeys checksums valid" test:
Loads an encrypted wallet with all the crypted keys with a valid checksum and
verifies that 'CWallet::Unlock' doesn't force an entire crypted keys re-write.
(we force a complete ckeys re-write if we find any missing crypted key checksum
during the wallet loading process)
2) "Missing checksum in one ckey" test:
Verifies that loading up a wallet with, at least one, 'ckey' with no checksum
triggers a complete re-write of the crypted keys.
3) "Invalid ckey checksum error" test:
Verifies that loading up a ckey with an invalid checksum stops the wallet loading
process with a corruption error.
4) "Invalid ckey pubkey error" test:
Verifies that loading up a ckey with an invalid pubkey stops the wallet loading
process with a corruption error.
|
|
|
|
files share the same purpose, and we shouldn't have wallet code
inside the test directory.
This later is needed to use wallet util functions in the bench
and test binaries without be forced to duplicate them.
|
|
so if there is an error in any of the pre-set coins, we can fail right away
without computing the wallet available coins set (calling `AvailableCoins`)
which is a slow operation as it goes through the entire wallet's txes map.
----------------------
And to make the Coin Selection flow cleared, have decoupled SelectCoins in two functions:
1) AutomaticCoinSelection.
2) SelectCoins.
1) AutomaticCoinSelection:
Receives a set of coins and selects the best subset of them to
cover the target amount.
2) SelectCoins
In charge of select all the user manually selected coins first ("pre-set inputs"), and
if coin_control 'm_allow_other_inputs=true', call 'AutomaticCoinSelection' to select a
subset of coins owned by the wallet to cover for the target - preset_inputs.total_amount
remaining value.
|
|
|
|
checking target
d0d9cf7aea2ff36a14a19e6999400e4070b7b0c9 test: Check external coin effective value is used in CoinSelection (Aurèle Oulès)
76b79c1a177afa006184d716bd3d5b22ebadb168 wallet: Use correct effective value when checking target (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Fixes #26185. The following assert failed because it was not checked in the parent function.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/2bd9aa5a44b88c866c4d98f8a7bf7154049cba31/src/wallet/coinselection.cpp#L391
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK d0d9cf7aea2ff36a14a19e6999400e4070b7b0c9
furszy:
ACK d0d9cf7a
Tree-SHA512: e126daba1115e9d143f2a582c6953e7ea55e96853b6e819c7744fd7a23668f7d9854681d43ef55d8774655bc54e7e87c1c9fccd746d9e30fbf3caa82ef808ae9
|