| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
36b68de5b2938722911db900ca299f7008780d01 Remove getBlockDepth method from Chain::interface (Antoine Riard)
b66c429c56c85fa16c309be0b2bca9c25fdd3e1a Remove locked_chain from GetDepthInMainChain and its callers (Antoine Riard)
0ff03871add000f8b4d8f82aeb168eed2fc9dc5f Use CWallet::m_last_block_processed_height in GetDepthInMainChain (Antoine Riard)
f77b1de16feee097a88e99d2ecdd4d84beb4f915 Only return early from BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain if current tip is exact match (Antoine Riard)
769ff05e48fb53d4b62c59060424a0fea71d0aab Refactor some importprunedfunds checks with guard clause (Antoine Riard)
5971d3848e09abf571e5308185275296127efca4 Add block_height field in struct Confirmation (Antoine Riard)
9700fcb47feca9d78e005b8d18b41148c8f6b25f Replace CWalletTx::SetConf by Confirmation initialization list (Antoine Riard)
5aacc3eff15b9b5bdc951f1e274f00d581f63bce Add m_last_block_processed_height field in CWallet (Antoine Riard)
10b4729e33f76092bd8cfa06d1a5e0a066436f76 Pass block height in Chain::BlockConnected/Chain::BlockDisconnected (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Work starter to remove Chain::Lock interface by adding m_last_block_processed_height in CWallet and m_block_height in CMerkleTx to avoid GetDepthInMainChain having to keep a lock . Once this one done, it should ease work to wipe out more cs_main locks from wallet code.
I think it's ready for a first round of review before to get further.
- `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrent` : restrain isPotentialTip to isTip because we want to be sure that wallet see BlockDisconnected callbacks if its height differs from the Chain one. It means during a reorg, an RPC could return before the BlockDisconnected callback had been triggered. This could cause a tx that had been included in the disconnected block to be displayed as confirmed, for example.
~~- `AbandonTransaction` : in case of conflicted tx (nIndex = -1), we set its m_block_height to the one of conflicting blocks, but if this height is superior to CWallet::m_last_block_processed_height, that means tx isn't conflicted anymore so we return 0 as tx is again unconfirmed~~ After #16624, we instead rely on Confirmation.
~~- `AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe`: in case of block disconnected, transactions are added to mempool again, so we need to replace old txn in `mapWallet` with a height set to zero so we remove check on block_hash.IsNull~~ Already done in #16624
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
@jkczyz you've ACKed an intermediate commit (github annoyingly orders commits in date order, not commit order). Did you mean to ACK the final commit in this branch (36b68de5b2938722911db900ca299f7008780d01).
jkczyz:
> @jkczyz you've ACKed an intermediate commit (github annoyingly orders commits in date order, not commit order). Did you mean to ACK the final commit in this branch ([36b68de](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/36b68de5b2938722911db900ca299f7008780d01)).
meshcollider:
utACK 36b68de5b2938722911db900ca299f7008780d01
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 36b68de5b2938722911db900ca299f7008780d01. Changes since last review: new jkczyz refactor importprunedfunds commit, changed BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChainChanges commit title and description, changed Confirmation struct field order and line-wrapped comment
jnewbery:
utACK 36b68de5b2938722911db900ca299f7008780d01
promag:
Code review ACK 36b68de5b2938722911db900ca299f7008780d01.
Tree-SHA512: 08b89a0bcc39f67c82a6cb6aee195e6a11697770c788ba737b90986b4893f44e90d1ab9ef87239ea3766508b7e24ea882b7199df41173ab27a3d000328c14644
|
|
We don't remove yet Chain locks as we need to preserve lock
order with CWallet one until swapping at once to avoid
deadlock failures (spotted by --enable-debug)
|
|
Pass CTxDestination instead of more ambiguous uint160 hash value. This is more
type safe and more efficient since it avoids doing map lookups that will always
fail and were not done previously before
a18edd7b383d667b15b6d4b87aa3a055a9fa5051 from
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17304
Change suggested by Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17304#discussion_r340345745 and
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17381#issuecomment-549994944
|
|
This also fixes unused variable warnings in rpcdump.cpp
|
|
436ad436434b94982bcb7dc1d13a21949263ef73 Fix issue with conflicted mempool tx in listsinceblock (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
Closes #8752 by bringing back abandoned #10470.
This now checks that returned transactions are not conflicting with any transactions that are filtered out by the given blockhash and add a functional test to prevent this in the future.
For more context, #8757 was closed in favor of #10470.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17258/commits/436ad436434b94982bcb7dc1d13a21949263ef73
kallewoof:
utACK 436ad436434b94982bcb7dc1d13a21949263ef73
jonatack:
I'm not qualifed to give an ACK here but 436ad436434b94982bcb7dc1d13a21949263ef73 appears reasonable. Built/ran tests/verified that this test fails without the change in rpcwallet.cpp:
Tree-SHA512: 63d75cd3d3f19fc84dc38899b200c96179b82b24db263cd0116ee5b715265be647157855c2e35912d2fbc49c7b37db9375d6aab0ac672f0f09bece8431de5ea9
|
|
c98bd13e675fbf5641ed64d551b63aaf55a1a8e9 replace asserts in RPC code with CHECK_NONFATAL and add linter (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
- Replace instances of assert in /rpc files and rpcwallet with CHECK_NONFATAL(condition)
- Add a linter to prevent future usage of assert being used in RPC code
ref https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17192
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK c98bd13e675fbf5641ed64d551b63aaf55a1a8e9 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: a16036b6bbcca73a5334665f66e17e1756377d582317568291da1d727fc9cf8c84bac9d9bd099534e1be315345336e5f7b66b93793135155f320dc5862a2d875
|
|
Easier to review ignoring whitespace:
git log -p -n1 -w
This commit does not change behavior.
|
|
|
|
362ded410b8cb1104b7ef31ff8488fec4824a7d5 Avoid using g_rpc_node global in wallet code (Russell Yanofsky)
8922d7f6b751a3e6b3b9f6fb7961c442877fb65a scripted-diff: Remove g_connman, g_banman globals (Russell Yanofsky)
e6f4f895d5e42feaf7bfa5f41e80292aaa73cd7d Pass NodeContext, ConnMan, BanMan references more places (Russell Yanofsky)
4d5448c76b71c9d91399c31b043237091be2e5e7 MOVEONLY: Move NodeContext struct to node/context.h (Russell Yanofsky)
301bd41a2e6765b185bd55f4c541f9e27aeea29d scripted-diff: Rename InitInterfaces to NodeContext (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change is mainly a naming / organization change intended to simplify #10102. It:
- Renames struct InitInterfaces to struct NodeContext and moves it from
src/init.h to src/node/context.h. This is a cosmetic change intended to make
the point of the struct more obvious.
- Gets rid of BanMan and ConnMan globals making them NodeContext members
instead. Getting rid of these globals has been talked about in past as a way
to implement testing and simulations. Making them NodeContext members is a
way of keeping them accessible without the globals.
- Splits g_rpc_interfaces global into g_rpc_node and g_rpc_chain globals. This
better separates node and wallet rpc methods. Node RPC methods should have
access NodeContext, while wallet RPC methods should only have indirect access
to node functionality via interfaces::Chain.
- Adds NodeContext& references to interfaces::Chain class and the
interfaces::MakeChain() function. This is needed to access ConnMan and BanMan
instances without the globals.
- Gets rid of redundant Node and Chain instances in Qt tests. This is
needed due to the previous MakeChain change, and also makes test setup a
little more straightforward. More cleanup could be done in the future, but it
will require deduplication of bitcoind, bitcoin-qt, and TestingSetup init
code.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 362ded410b8cb1104b7ef31ff8488fec4824a7d5
Tree-SHA512: 9ae6ff1e33423291d1e52056bac95e0874538390892a6e83c4c115b3c73155a8827c0191b46eb3d14e3b3f6c23ccb08095490880fbc3188026319c71739f7db2
|
|
Wallet code should use interfaces::Chain and not directly access to node state.
Add a g_rpc_chain replacement global for wallet code to use, and move
g_rpc_node definition to a libbitcoin_server source file so there are link
errors if wallet code tries to access it.
|
|
So g_connman and g_banman globals can be removed next commit.
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
s() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; }
s 'struct InitInterfaces' 'struct NodeContext'
s 'InitInterfaces interfaces' 'NodeContext node'
s 'InitInterfaces& interfaces' 'NodeContext\& node'
s 'InitInterfaces m_interfaces' 'NodeContext m_context'
s 'InitInterfaces\* g_rpc_interfaces' 'NodeContext* g_rpc_node'
s 'g_rpc_interfaces = &interfaces' 'g_rpc_node = \&node'
s 'g_rpc_interfaces' 'g_rpc_node'
s 'm_interfaces' 'm_context'
s 'interfaces\.chain' 'node.chain'
s '\(AppInitMain\|Shutdown\|Construct\)(interfaces)' '\1(node)'
s 'init interfaces' 'chain clients'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
listsinceblock now checks that returned transactions are not
conflicting with any transactions that are filtered out by
the given blockhash
Co-Authored-By: Michael Chrostowski <michael.chrostowski@gmail.com>
|
|
This moves CWallet members and methods dealing with keys to a new
LegacyScriptPubKeyMan class, and updates calling code to reference the new
class instead of CWallet.
Most of the changes are simple text replacements and variable substitutions
easily verified with:
git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=.
The only nontrivial chunk of code added is the new LegacyScriptPubKeyMan class
declaration, but this code isn't new and is just selectively copied and moved
from the previous CWallet class declaration. This can be verified with:
git log -p -n1 --color-moved=dimmed_zebra src/wallet/scriptpubkeyman.h src/wallet/wallet.h
or
git diff HEAD~1:src/wallet/wallet.h HEAD:src/wallet/scriptpubkeyman.h
This commit does not change behavior.
|
|
9e95931865186d7a9a6dc54b64bd96507e9fea4b [wallet] Remove `state` argument from CWallet::CommitTransaction (John Newbery)
d1734f9a3b138ab046f38ee44a09bc3847bf938a [wallet] Remove return value from CommitTransaction() (John Newbery)
b6f486a02b463ffeaf82ec11fc6f74f439c037ae [wallet] Add doxygen comment to CWallet::CommitTransaction() (John Newbery)
8bba91b22d22a8dfea7c947b542b1022bfc1c0ea [wallet] Fix whitespace in CWallet::CommitTransaction() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
`CommitTransaction()` returns a bool to indicate success, but since commit
b3a7410 (#9302) it only returns true, even if the transaction was not
successfully broadcast. This commit changes CommitTransaction() to return
void.
All dead code in `if (!CommitTransaction())` branches has been removed.
Two additional commits fix up the idiosyncratic whitespace in `CommitTransaction` and add a doxygen comment for the function.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 9e95931865186d7a9a6dc54b64bd96507e9fea4b
Tree-SHA512: a55a2c20369a45222fc0e02d0891495655a926e71c4f52cb72624768dd7b9c1dca716ea67d38420afb90f40c6e0fd448caa60c18fd693bb10ecb110b641820e6
|
|
facec1c643105d0ae74b5d32cf33d593f9e82a36 wallet: Avoid showing GUI popups on RPC errors (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
RPC errors and warnings are shown as popups in the GUI instead of being returned to the RPC caller. For example,
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli loadwallet $(pwd)/./test/functional/data/wallets/high_minversion/
error code: -4
error message:
Wallet loading failed.
```
gives me a GUI popup and no reason why loading the wallet failed.
After this pull request:
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli loadwallet $(pwd)/./test/functional/data/wallets/high_minversion/
error code: -4
error message:
Wallet loading failed: Error loading /home/marco/workspace/btc_bitcoin_core/./test/functional/data/wallets/high_minversion/wallet.dat: Wallet requires newer version of Bitcoin Core
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK facec1c643105d0ae74b5d32cf33d593f9e82a36
Tree-SHA512: c8274bbb02cfcf71676eeec1e773e51fb3538cf93f82e7cb8536f4716d44ed819cdc162dfc039ac7386a4db381a734cdb27fd32567043a1180c02519fbcba194
|
|
The `state` return argument has not been set since commit 611291c198.
Remove it (and the one place that it's used in a calling function).
|
|
CommitTransaction returns a bool to indicate success, but since commit
b3a74100b8 it only returns true, even if the transaction was not
successfully broadcast. This commit changes CommitTransaction() to return
void.
All dead code in `if (!CommitTransaction())` branches has been removed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fields involvesWatchonly, generated, walletconflicts were missing
in result description of listtransactions, listsinceblock,
gettransaction
Align getttransaction fields which were odd compare to other rpc
helpers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c812aba3949b6ab81030dc708cda7c8821be2f70 test bumpfee fee_rate argument (ezegom)
9f25de3d9eb8d012ca1a98cbcd28021e3e1c85ee rpc bumpfee check fee_rate argument (ezegom)
88e5f997dfab3f03bb1ec3f149eaff8dcc2981fe rpc bumpfee: add fee_rate argument (ezegom)
1a4c791cf49ff15aa9deba4388c0180b8f47f15b rpc bumpfee: move feerate estimation logic into separate method (ezegom)
Pull request description:
Taking over for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16492 which seems to have gone inactive.
Only minor commit cleanups, rebase, and some help text fixes on top of previous PR. Renamed `feeRate` to `fee_rate` to reflect updated guidelines.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Code review ACK c812aba
laanwj:
ACK c812aba3949b6ab81030dc708cda7c8821be2f70
Tree-SHA512: 5f7f51bd780a573ccef1ccd72b0faf3e5d143f6551060a667560c5163f7d9480e17e73775d1d7bcac0463f3b6b4328f0cff7b27e39483bddc42a530f4583ce30
|
|
80031045fc6435ef4eb5dd1aee773d938c57a0fd Clarify includeWatching for fundrawtransaction (Steven Roose)
Pull request description:
Might be sufficient to solve https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16396, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7879 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14405.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 8003104. This will always be confusing, but at least it gives a bunch more clues for the user to google.
Tree-SHA512: 9b8002c259c50f93d89fc5574105aae6152858d8d45c07b4c3d5b7023adafe73c7a98a290874ff3fbbb7dfad2ac1bdf4acb8769a2a1c14e38484922f44e84e54
|
|
|
|
PR 16866 renamed the 'decode' argument in gettransaction to 'verbose' to make it more consistent with other RPC calls like getrawtransaction.
However, it seems it inadvertently overloaded the 'details' fields when 'verbose' is passed. The result is that the original 'details' fields are no longer returned, which seems to be a breaking API change.
This PR takes the simplest path to restoring the 'details' fields by renaming them from 'details' back to 'decoded', while leaving the 'verbose' argument for API consistency.
It also addresses [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16185#discussion_r320740413) to mention that the 'decoded' field is identical to decoderawtransaction.
Update the RPC help, functional test, and release note.
|
|
This makes the RPC method consistent with other RPC methods that have a
'verbose' option.
Change the name of the return object from 'decoded' to details.
Update help text.
|
|
|
|
prevtx parsing
39034f1ee628dae0bc9da5b1b30b8a424e66d968 Refactor rawtransaction_util's SignTransaction to have previous tx parsing be separate (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the `SignTransaction` function has to handle both the actual signing and parsing of previous transaction data. This PR splits it so that `SignTransaction` only handles the signing itself and adds a `ParsePrevouts` function which handles parsing the prevtx information.
This allows for `SignTransaction` to just take any `SigningProvider`.
Split from #16341
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 39034f1ee628dae0bc9da5b1b30b8a424e66d968
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16798/commits/39034f1ee628dae0bc9da5b1b30b8a424e66d968
ryanofsky:
utACK 39034f1ee628dae0bc9da5b1b30b8a424e66d968. No change since previously reviewed b49bbb939be92a67ff77c3f7bca5bb94dd141906, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16341#pullrequestreview-278610269 other than rebase with no conflicts.
Tree-SHA512: 09f7733e90691766bfb5cf0f20e913dbf270bd3b51abdcad966b24d110e562ed85fd3d0d1d7bbea61f903340060052ec73c4817b09aee0dc1f3916d781a9e40c
|
|
442a87cc0ae43ebc9b6654a6165778eecb931f74 Add a test wallet_reorgsrestore (Antoine Riard)
40ede992d97df38282919693dfe851c975c3b1d8 Modify wallet tx status if has been reorged out (Antoine Riard)
7e89994133725125dddbfa8d45484e3b9ed51c6e Remove SyncTransaction for conflicted txn in CWallet::BlockConnected (Antoine Riard)
a31be09bfd77eed497a8e251d31358e16e2f2eb1 Encapsulate tx status in a Confirmation struct (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
While working on #15931, I've tried to rationalize tx state management to ease integration of block height tracking per-wallet tx. We currently rely on a combination of `hashBlock` and `nIndex` with magic value to determine tx confirmation, conflicted or abandoned state. It's hard to reason and error-prone. To solve that, we encapsulate these fields in a `TxConfirmation` struct and introduce a `TxState` member that we update accordingly at block connection/disconnection.
Following jnewbery [recommendation](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15931#discussion_r312576506), I've taken these changes in its own commit, and open a PR to get them first. It would ease review of aforementioned PR, but above all should ease fixing of long-term issues like :
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7315 (but maybe we should abandon abandontransaction or relieve it to only free outpoints not track the transaction as abandoned in itself, need its own discussion)
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8692 where we should cancel conflicted state of transactions chain smoothly
* `MarkConflicted` in `LoadToWallet` is likely useless if we track conflicts rights at block connection
Main changes of this PR to get right are tx update in `AddToWallet` and serialization/deserialization logic.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Light re-Code Review ACK 442a87cc0ae43ebc9b6654a6165778eecb931f74
ryanofsky:
utACK 442a87cc0ae43ebc9b6654a6165778eecb931f74. Changes since last review are switching from `hasChain` to `LockChain` and removing chain lock in `WalletBatch::LoadWallet` that's redundant with the new lock still added in `CWallet::LoadWallet`, and fixing python test race condition.
Tree-SHA512: 029209e006de0240436817204e69e548c5665e2b0721b214510e7aba7eba130a5eab441d3a1ad95bd6426114dd27390492c77bf4560a9610009b32cd0a1f72f7
|
|
be separate
|
|
This adds a new boolean parameter 'decode' to the gettransaction call, which, if set to true, add a 'decoded' field to the result containing the decoded transaction
|
|
Instead of relying on combination of hashBlock and nIndex
values to manage tx in its lifecycle, we introduce 4
status : CONFIRMED, UNCONFIRMED, CONFLICTED, ABANDONED.
hashBlock and nIndex magic values should only be used at
serialization/deserialization for backward-compatibility.
At block disconnection, we know flag txn as UNCONFIRMED where
previously they kept their states until being override by a
block connection or abandontransaction call. This is a change
in behavior for which user may have to call abandon twice
if transaction is disconnected and not accepted back in the mempool.
We assert status transitioning right in AddToWallet. Doing so
flagged a misbehavior in ComputeTimeSmart unit test where same
tx is confirmed twice in different block. To avoid inconsistencies
we unconfirmed tx before new connection in different block. We
also remove a cs_main lock in test, as AddToWallet and its
callees don't rely on locked chain.
|
|
72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9 tests: functional watch-only wallet tests (William Casarin)
72ffbdc5799c1707ecad674d701b43fb80b031d0 doc: add release note for include_watchonly default changes (William Casarin)
003a3c73c0450aa18ac2ab2ca47def2b8c53a7df rpcwallet: document include_watchonly default for watchonly wallets (William Casarin)
a50d9e6c0b8e8144d3deec58ec2e3449ba081151 rpcwallet: default include_watchonly to true for watchonly wallets (William Casarin)
Pull request description:
Right now it's a bit annoying to deal with watchonly wallets, many rpc commands have an `include_watchonly` argument that needs to be explicitly set.
Wallets created with `createwallet` can have a `disable_private_keys` parameter, for those wallets we already know that they are watchonly, so there's no reason to have to explicitly ask for it for every command. Instead we check this wallet flag when the `include_watchonly` parameter isn't set.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code review ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9
Sjors:
ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9
promag:
ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9, code review only, didn't look closely to the test.
kallewoof:
ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9
fanquake:
ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9 - I've looked over the changes, they make sense to me. Compiled and ran the tests etc.
Tree-SHA512: d3646b55e97f386594d7efc994f0712f3888475c6a5dc7f131ac9f8c49bf5d4677182b88f42b34152abe1ad101ecadd152b4c20e9d3c1267190db36f77ab8bd7
|
|
RPC server starts in warmup mode, it can't
process yet calls, then follows connection manager
initialization and finally RPC server get out of
warmup mode. RPC calls shouldn't be able to get
P2P disabled errors because once we initialize
g_connman it's not unset until shutdown, after
RPC server has been stopped.
|
|
d6b3640ac732f6f66a8cb6761084d1beecc8a876 [test] walletcreatefundedpsbt: check RBF is disabled when -walletrbf=0 (Sjors Provoost)
9ed062b5685eb6227d694572cb0f7bfbcc151b36 [doc] rpc: remove "fallback to" from RBF default help (Sjors Provoost)
4fcb698bc2bb74171cd3a14b94f9882d8e19e9fb [rpc] walletcreatefundedpsbt: use wallet default RBF (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
The `walletcreatefundedpsbt` RPC call currently ignores `-walletrbf` and defaults to not use RBF. This PR fixes that.
This PR also replaces UniValue in `ConstructTransaction` with a `bool` in preparation of moving this helper method out of the RPC codebase entirely. This may be a bit overkill, but does slightly simplify it.
Fixes #15878
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK d6b3640ac732f6f66a8cb6761084d1beecc8a876
l2a5b1:
re-ACK d6b3640
MarcoFalke:
ACK d6b3640ac732f6f66a8cb6761084d1beecc8a876
Tree-SHA512: 55b9bccd1ef36b54f6b34793017dc0721103099ad3761b3b04862291ee13d6915915d4dbb1a8567924fa56e5e95dfe10eec070e06701610e70c87f8ea92b2a00
|
|
wallets
c5d37873677551caac34752214dd491f5278c8d5 Allow createwallet to take empty passwords to make unencrypted wallets (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Allow createwallet to take the empty string as a password and interpret that as leaving the wallet unencrypted. Also warn when that happens.
This fixes a bug where it was not possible to use the `avoid_reuse` option for new unencrypted wallets without using named arguments.Thus this allows more `createwallet` options to be added that can be set on unencrypted wallets when using positional arguments.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
code review ACK c5d37873677551caac34752214dd491f5278c8d5
meshcollider:
re-utACK c5d37873677551caac34752214dd491f5278c8d5
ryanofsky:
utACK c5d37873677551caac34752214dd491f5278c8d5. Changes since last review are rebasing, concatenating warning strings to avoid discarding warnings, adding release notes, and choosing an unambiguous wallet name for the test.
Tree-SHA512: 146737a728dd614ba94d4b166b27e8c9e195badd1709ccab2315afe59176d9b493dfba9b61c3ed81090f059c7e464d709deb06d99451b9a3fff667f527d6f7c9
|
|
80ba4241a6773590f6b2c18dae758097b5adc02e extract min & max depth onto coin control (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
- Refactor `AvailableCoins` to pull min & max depths from coin control.
- Add `m_max_depth` to coin control to support this.
- Addresses issue https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15823, see thread for further details.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 80ba4241a6773590f6b2c18dae758097b5adc02e
Tree-SHA512: 8f7c0aa90b3bc3667baf6741b1da2829f3919e1df92ae097d86c6b239f0c024eb410d7100e6251ea8fc49d022fb5a1214bf79b0f8b0014945b7784b2311647d1
|
|
Allow createwallet to take the empty string as a password and interpret that
as leaving the wallet unencrypted. Also warn when that happens.
|
|
e967cae8fac84ec7a89a3a853a83d8193ac3308e Use switch on status in RpcWallet (Fabian Jahr)
ba1f128d6c117a63d5d904b3956551bd83405ec9 Return error for ignored passphrase through disable private keys option (Fabian Jahr)
d6649d16b57e20b05075f1c80d0de7ff32cca1a4 Use strong enum for WalletCreationStatus (Fabian Jahr)
3199610ad3b93b849f2cb55a8ed3a39a32bbdffc Place out args at the end for CreateWallet (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up PR to #16244
The following suggestions are included:
- Usage of `enum class` (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16244#discussion_r296434142)
- Placing out args at the end convention (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16244#discussion_r296434172)
- Return error when passphrase would be ignored because of disabled private keys (including functional test) (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16244#pullrequestreview-252015195)
- Make `status` return variable of `CreateWallet` (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16244#discussion_r302107394)
- Using a `switch` statement instead of `if/else` in `RpcWallet` (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16244#discussion_r302112502)
Not included was:
- "new create wallet function [could take] separate option arguments instead of wallet flags" (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16244#pullrequestreview-252015195)
- "blank wallet and disable private keys options could be combined into a single option" (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16244#pullrequestreview-252015195)
For these last two changes, I was not sure what an ideal solution could look like and/or this might be of slightly larger scope than the other changes, but I would be happy to work on these as well in this PR or another follow-up if I get positive feedback on that. Is there a place in the codebase that handles flags like these in a better way that I can refer to? Nonetheless, I would prefer keeping it in a separate PR unless it is a really simple change.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review utACK e967cae8fac84ec7a89a3a853a83d8193ac3308e
MarcoFalke:
ACK e967cae8fa
Tree-SHA512: 3d12880ff95add9e4a5702afa26ef38080b57b216a608c113a4d0a08ba2d61142c027ba0071c6402add45db90383eee0bada12dc42820dc0d602721d7175edd5
|
|
|
|
|
|
2f7eb772f6250442d4a0071318047cb2deeb31fa Add RPC bumpfee totalFee deprecation test (Jon Atack)
a92d9ce8cf355e18e43e1f207e4be9e42e7ec81a deprecate totalFee argument in bumpfee RPC call (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
totalFee argument is of questionable use, and should be removed in favor of feerate-based features.
I first moved IsDeprecatedRPCEnabled because `bitcoin-wallet` doesn't link `libbitcoin_server`.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
utACK 2f7eb772f6250442d4a0071318047cb2deeb31fa. Only change since last review is leaving IsDeprecatedRPCEnabled in its happy home, and switching to rpcEnableDeprecated instead. (Thanks!)
jonatack:
ACK 2f7eb772f6250442d4a0071318047cb2deeb31fa. Built locally, manually tested rpc bumpfee, help output ([gist](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/863673eacc02f9da39ff6d6712f9d837)), all tests pass. Travis failures appears to be unrelated, the [bitcoin builds are green](https://bitcoinbuilds.org/index.php?build=121).
meshcollider:
Code Review ACK 2f7eb772f6250442d4a0071318047cb2deeb31fa
Tree-SHA512: c97465205ee59575df37894bcbb6c4ecf8858dd8fe9d89503f9342b226768c1dcb553153bc9eb3055f7bf5eb41573e48b8efa57e083cd255793cbe5280f0026a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
