Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Co-authored-by: stickies-v <stickies-v@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gloria Zhao <gloriajzhao@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Commits of previous years:
- 2021: f47dda2c58b5d8d623e0e7ff4e74bc352dfa83d7
- 2020: fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
- 2019: aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
|
|
unnecessarily copying objects and enable two clang-tidy checks
ae7ae36d311a869b3bda41d29dc0e47fade77d28 tidy: Enable two clang-tidy checks (Aurèle Oulès)
081b0e53e3adca7ea57d23e5fcd9db4b86415a72 refactor: Make const refs vars where applicable (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
I added const references to some variables to avoid unnecessarily copying objects.
Also added two clang-tidy checks : [performance-for-range-copy](https://releases.llvm.org/11.1.0/tools/clang/tools/extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance-for-range-copy.html) and [performance-unnecessary-copy-initialization](https://releases.llvm.org/12.0.0/tools/clang/tools/extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance-unnecessary-copy-initialization.html).
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK ae7ae36d311a869b3bda41d29dc0e47fade77d28
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ae7ae36d311a869b3bda41d29dc0e47fade77d28
Tree-SHA512: f6ac6b0cd0eee1e0c34d2f186484bc0f7ec6071451cccb33fa88a67d93d92b304e2fac378b88f087e94657745bca4e966dbc443759587400eb01b1f3061fde8c
|
|
a6b0c1fcc06485ecd320727fa7534a51a20608c1 doc: add releases notes for 25504 (listsinceblock updates) (Antoine Poinsot)
0fd2d144540b720626fc065a3cef5188831b5ee2 rpc: add an include_change parameter to listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55f98d087efd2609d808c082d5770306cc489409 rpc: output parent wallet descriptors for coins in listunspent (Antoine Poinsot)
b724476158a7dfeef9edfda3f519dfd6f93202a8 rpc: output wallet descriptors for received entries in listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55a82eaf91d252a04a0cc8ad7d948d956c6cb24f wallet: allow to fetch the wallet descriptors for a given Script (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Wallet descriptors are useful for applications using the Bitcoin Core wallet as a backend for tracking coins, as they allow to track coins for multiple descriptors in a single wallet. However there is no information currently given for such applications to link a coin with an imported descriptor, severely limiting the possibilities for such applications of using multiple descriptors in a single wallet. This PR outputs the matching imported descriptor(s) for a given received coin in `listsinceblock` (and friends).
It comes from a need for an application i'm working on, but i think it's something any software using `bitcoind` to track multiple descriptors in a single wallet would have eventually. For instance i'm thinking about the BDK project. Currently, the way to achieve this is to import raw addresses with labels and to have your application be responsible for wallet things like the gap limit.
I'll add this to the output of `listunspent` too if this gets a few Concept ACKs.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25504/commits/a6b0c1fcc06485ecd320727fa7534a51a20608c1
achow101:
re-ACK a6b0c1fcc06485ecd320727fa7534a51a20608c1
Tree-SHA512: 7a5850e8de98b439ddede2cb72de0208944f8cda67272e8b8037678738d55b7a5272375be808b0f7d15def4904430e089dafdcc037436858ff3292c5f8b75e37
|
|
It's useful for an external application tracking coins to not be limited
by our change detection. For instance, for a watchonly wallet with two
descriptors a transaction from one to the other would be considered a
change output and not be included in the result (if the address was not
generated by this wallet).
|
|
This avoids initializing variables with the copy-constructor of a
non-trivially copyable type.
|
|
check code
47ea70fbb85fefeb4de9d3142a11596d292eab9b wallet: clean AllInputsMine code, use InputIsMine internally (furszy)
bf310b0e8ce82d52bacceeb47c9f5dbb26885f7e wallet: clean InputIsMine code, use GetWalletTx (furszy)
0cb177263c36118094b7cd3b8f94741c0471ff62 wallet: unify CachedTxGetImmatureCredit and CachedTxGetImmatureWatchOnlyCredit (furszy)
04c6423f7b250ae1e51bb5cd159913e97494fb0e wallet: remove always true 'fUseCache' arg from CachedTxGetAvailableCredit (furszy)
4f0ca9bff6299353f595fe168dce720a96a91c41 wallet: remove always false 'recalculate' arg from GetCachableAmount (furszy)
47b1012677821ce2939e10ba462fbe53ffff17df wallet: remove always true 'fUseCache' from CachedTxGetImmatureWatchOnlyCredit (furszy)
da8f62de2c5561e091ef8073d6950c033f41aabf wallet: remove always true 'fUseCache' from CachedTxGetImmatureCredit (furszy)
Pull request description:
Another wallet's code garbage collector work. Part of the `mapWallet` encapsulation goal.
Focused on the following points:
1) Remove always true `fUseCache` argument from `CachedTxGetImmatureCredit`, `CachedTxGetImmatureWatchOnly` and `CachedTxGetAvailableCredit`.
2) Remove always false `recalculate` argument from `GetCachableAmount`.
3) Merge `CachedTxGetImmatureCredit` and `CachedTxGetImmatureWatchOnlyCredit` as they do share the exact same code.
4) Clean `InputIsMine` method; use `GetWalletTx` instead of access the wallet's map directly.
5) Clean `AllInputsMine` method; use `InputIsMine` instead of duplicate the exact same code internally.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
re-ACK 47ea70fbb85fefeb4de9d3142a11596d292eab9b
achow101:
ACK 47ea70fbb85fefeb4de9d3142a11596d292eab9b
theStack:
re-ACK 47ea70fbb85fefeb4de9d3142a11596d292eab9b
Tree-SHA512: e9b64b57de7be6165c5e5552e28cd8a03d4736b0a3707d29d129e3a0a3db6a855c2abf47a24917236060835a297b564a97b66d4c8b178d6bdafb93a12a7c0b40
|
|
Instead of duplicate the exact same code twice.
|
|
Instead of calling GetCachableAmount twice, which will result in
iterating through all the transaction txins/txouts and calling
GetDebit/GetCredit (which lock cs_wallet), just merge the filters and do
it once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move amount.h to consensus/amount.h.
Renames, adds missing and removes uneeded includes.
|
|
Followup to commit "MOVEONLY: CWallet transaction code out of
wallet.cpp/.h" that detaches and renames some CWalletTx methods, making
into them into standalone functions or CWallet methods instead.
There are no changes in behavior and no code changes that aren't purely
mechanical. It just gives spend and receive functions more consistent
names and removes the circular dependencies added by the earlier
MOVEONLY commit.
There are also no comment or documentation changes. Removed comments
from transaction.h are just migrated to spend.h, receive.h, and
wallet.h.
|
|
This commit just moves functions without making any changes. It can be
reviewed with `git log -p -n1 --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`
Motivation for this change is to make wallet.cpp/h less monolithic and
start to make wallet transaction state tracking comprehensible so bugs
in
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Transaction-Conflict-Tracking
can be fixed safely without introducing new problems.
This commit moves wallet classes and methods that deal with transactions
out of wallet.cpp/.h into better organized files:
- transaction.cpp/.h - CWalletTx and CMerkleTx class definitions
- receive.cpp/.h - functions checking received transactions and computing balances
- spend.cpp/.h - functions creating transactions and finding spendable coins
After #20773, when loading is separated from syncing it will also be
possible to move more wallet.cpp/.h functions to:
- sync.cpp/.h - functions handling chain notifications and rescanning
This commit arranges receive.cpp and spend.cpp functions in dependency
order so it's possible to skim receive.cpp and get an idea of how
computing balances works, and skim spend.cpp and get an idea of how
transactions are created, without having to jump all over wallet.cpp
where functions are not in order and there is a lot of unrelated code.
Followup commit "refactor: Detach wallet transaction methods" in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21206 follows up this PR and
tweaks function names and arguments to reflect new locations. The two
commits are split into separate PRs because this commit is more work to
maintain and less work to review, while the other commit is less work to
maintain and more work to review, so hopefully this commit can be merged
earlier.
|