Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Feefilter option is debug only and it isn't used in any tests, it's wasteful
to check this option for every peer on every iteration of the message handler
loop. refs #21545
|
|
Just use std::optional
|
|
fa09a9eac8d8ab65ce4064c35a9f21349a644982 style: Add { } to multi-line if (MarcoFalke)
fadafab83379ff10d86ada179c6f9641d19464fe move-only: Move functions to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
fa7e64d58615fffea91cd64dc4a2790221ceff0a move-only: Move constants to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
fa247a327fc7c7cea6bc8f93637b8babd3015ffa refactor: Move block storage globals to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
fa81c30c6f1adac79517c958090db174eb6aeda2 refactor: Move pruning/reindex/importing globals to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
See #21575
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK fa09a9eac8d8ab65ce4064c35a9f21349a644982
kiminuo:
ACK fa09a9e
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa09a9eac8d8ab65ce4064c35a9f21349a644982
promag:
Code review ACK fa09a9eac8d8ab65ce4064c35a9f21349a644982. Since last review
Tree-SHA512: 2eb6962ff44da6b77f3058fc02ec66ab742e25ae8dcc8ec62b062896571910d43ca7c4bb16fb3ccb5e5245195b8dec6384b6c8d442fa97ca28d93bdff347d677
|
|
5f96d7d22d8e05876c6fc014e70488699950fe38 rpc: gettxoutsetinfo rejects hash_serialized_2 for specific height (Fabian Jahr)
23fe50436be641d7417152adc683192649ba206a test: Add test for coinstatsindex behavior in reorgs (Fabian Jahr)
90c966b0f3cfbd6bce5883f46d8527c6853a86a2 rpc: Allow gettxoutsetinfo and getblockstats for stale blocks (Fabian Jahr)
b9362392aef2689bc106c20925859ede555d082b index, rpc: Add use_index option for gettxoutsetinfo (Fabian Jahr)
bb7788b121a30489bc81a1f46dde6a9b19ae4ec1 test: Test coinstatsindex robustness across restarts (Fabian Jahr)
e0938c29099635150014ffc9bb0cafa8049ec55a test: Add tests for block_info in gettxoutsetinfo (Fabian Jahr)
2501576eccb08af80471c7b7b843b189ad6758c0 rpc, index: Add verbose amounts tracking to Coinstats index (Fabian Jahr)
655d929836a71af23d2035d2e2e99ad8b8c340c3 test: add coinstatsindex getindexinfo coverage, improve current tests (Jon Atack)
ca01bb8d689f93e1c7669b0ba7a4994c0206dabd rpc: Add Coinstats index to getindexinfo (Fabian Jahr)
57a026c30fef3138bb8db46e6865acb9dc2674f8 test: Add unit test for Coinstats index (Fabian Jahr)
6a4c0c09ab4d073a26c3c4a02783d5dcd88f6eef test: Add functional test for Coinstats index (Fabian Jahr)
3f166ecc125fce6ccd995687fa16572090a5d099 rpc: gettxoutsetinfo can be requested for specific blockheights (Fabian Jahr)
3c914d58ff323255b32e717d0ce28209ec0abdaa index: Coinstats index can be activated with command line flag (Fabian Jahr)
dd58a4de21469d6d848ae309edc47f558628221d index: Add Coinstats index (Fabian Jahr)
a8a46c4b3cfda4b95c92a36f8cebd3606377e57d refactor: Simplify ApplyStats and ApplyHash (Fabian Jahr)
9c8a265fd21a87228c18a1661df99fedc1866baf refactor: Pass hash_type to CoinsStats in stats object (Fabian Jahr)
2e2648a9021dfbb6e17dfa81472f057dacbc34e0 crypto: Make MuHash Remove method efficient (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This is part of the coinstats index project tracked in #18000
While the review of the new UTXO set hash algorithm (MuHash) takes longer recently #19328 was merged which added the possibility to run `gettxoutsetinfo` with a specific hash type. As the first type it added `hash_type=none` which skips the hashing of the UTXO set altogether. This alone did not make `gettxoutsetinfo` much faster but it allows the use of an index for the remaining coin statistics even before a new hashing algorithm has been added. Credit to Sjors for the idea to take this intermediate step.
Features summary:
- Users can start their node with the option `-coinstatsindex` which syncs the index in the background
- After the index is synced the user can use `gettxoutsetinfo` with `hash_type=none` or `hash_type=muhash` and will get the response instantly out of the index
- The user can specify a height or block hash when calling `gettxoutsetinfo` to see coin statistics at a specific block height
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-tACK 5f96d7d22d8e05876c6fc014e70488699950fe38
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 5f96d7d22d8e05876c6fc014e70488699950fe38 per `git range-diff 13d27b4 07201d3 5f96d7d`
promag:
Tested ACK 5f96d7d22d8e05876c6fc014e70488699950fe38. Light code review ACK 5f96d7d22d8e05876c6fc014e70488699950fe38.
Tree-SHA512: cbca78bee8e9605c19da4fbcd184625fb280200718396c694a56c7daab6f44ad23ca9fb5456d09f245d8b8d9659fdc2b3f3ce5e953c1c6cf4003dbc74c0463c2
|
|
363df758a9e0b5e0aa5ab401de2de820fc362c19 doc/style followups in MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
Pull request description:
Follow up to #21062. Was going to be a part of #20833 but I'm trying to break it down as much as possible.
- Make members const (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21062#discussion_r573659273)
- List fee units (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21062#discussion_r569329362)
- Use default value for `TxValidationState` in the success case (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21062#discussion_r573659801).
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 363df758a9e0b5e0aa5ab401de2de820fc362c19
practicalswift:
cr ACK 363df758a9e0b5e0aa5ab401de2de820fc362c19: patch looks correct and `const` is better than non-`const` (where possible :))
ariard:
Code Review ACK 363df75
Tree-SHA512: 0ff1a0279e08e03204e48d0f4c92428d7f39c32f52c1d20fe6a0283d605839898297344be82ca69640ba9f878ca4ebd5da2d717e26d719a183b211d709334082
|
|
844ad0eccaa1dbfefc30d19804d95d67c3d5f06d doc: IsSnapshotActive (James O'Beirne)
9b604c0207b526c008617cdca210f35db5e344db validation: prepare VerifyDB for assumeutxo (James O'Beirne)
7901647d722bcc5b0554ad73b14481cbe73608e4 refactor: rename active_chainstate in VerifyDB (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)
---
~~Pretty cut and dry; parameterizes `CVerifyDB` methods so that we can run the verify procedure on multiple chainstates.~~
Two minor tweaks to ensure that `VerifyDB` can be run on multiple chainstates and a corresponding rename.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review re-ACK 844ad0eccaa1dbfefc30d19804d95d67c3d5f06d
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 844ad0eccaa1dbfefc30d19804d95d67c3d5f06d 🐥
Tree-SHA512: 26a398cf4dabc1aa0850743921dba0452b4813848a3c777586dc981716737e98e17b8110254a5c41af95dd236e0c00dc8b4eee891d69bef825a5e1911fc499d0
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, keep a declaration in validation to make it possible to move
smaller chunks to blockstorage without breaking compilation.
Also, expose AbortNode in the header.
Can be reviewed with --color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space
|
|
Can be reviewed with --color-moved=dimmed-zebra
|
|
d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd [validation] RewindBlockIndex no longer needed (Dhruv Mehta)
Pull request description:
Closes #17862
Context from [original comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17862#issuecomment-744285188) (minor edits):
`RewindBlockIndex()` is a mechanism to allow nodes to be upgraded after segwit activation, while still keeping their chainstate/datadir in a consistent state. It works as follows:
- A pre-segwit (i.e. v0.13.0 or older) node is running.
- Segwit activates. The pre-segwit node remains sync'ed to the tip, but is not enforcing the new segwit rules.
- The user upgrades the node to a segwit-aware version (v0.13.1 or newer).
- On startup, in `AppInitMain()`, `RewindBlockIndex()` is called. This walks the chain backwards from the tip, disconnecting and erasing blocks that from after segwit activation that weren't validated with segwit rules.
- those blocks are then redownloaded (with witness data) and validated with segwit rules.
This logic probably isn't required any more since:
- Segwit activated at height 481824, when the block chain was 130GB and the total number of txs was 250 million. Today, we're at height 667704, the blockchain is over 315GB and the total number of txs is over 600 million. Even if 20% of that added data is witness data (a high estimate), then around 150GB of transactions would need to be rewound to get back to segwit activation height. It'd probably be faster to simply validate from genesis, especially since we won't be validating any scripts before the assumevalid block. It's also unclear whether rewinding 150GB of transactions would even work. It's certainly never been tested.
- Bitcoin Core v0.13 is hardly used any more. https://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html shows less than 50 nodes running it. The software was EOL on Aug 1st 2018. It's very unlikely that anyone is running 0.13 and will want to upgrade to 0.22.
This PR introduces `NeedsRedownload()` which merely checks for insufficiently validated segwit blocks and requests that the user restarts the node with `-reindex`. Reindexing the block files upon restart will make the node rebuild chain state and block index from the `blk*.dat` files on disk. The node won't be able to index the blocks with `BLOCK_OPT_WITNESS`, so they will be missing from the chain and be re-downloaded, with witness data.
Removing this code allows the following (done in follow-up #21090):
- removal of tests using `segwitheight=-1` in `p2p_segwit.py`.
- in turn, that allows us to drop support for `-segwitheight=-1`, which is only supported for that test.
- that allows us to always set `NODE_WITNESS` in our local services. The only reason we don't do that is to support `-segwitheight=-1`.
- that in turn allows us to drop all of the `GetLocalServices() & NODE_WITNESS` checks inside `net_processing.cpp`, since our local services would always include `NODE_WITNESS`
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd
jamesob:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21009/commits/d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd
laanwj:
Cursory code review ACK d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd. Agree with the direction of the change, thanks for simplifying the logic here.
glozow:
utACK d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd
Tree-SHA512: 3eddf5121ccd081ad7f15a5c6478ef867083edc8ba0bf1ee759e87bc070ee3d2f0698a3feba8db8dc087987c8452887b6f72cff05b3e178f41cb10a515fb8053
|
|
|
|
|
|
Removes assumptions of use only on the active chainstate.
|
|
To prepare VerifyDB semantics for multiple
chainstate use.
|
|
Instead of rewinding blocks, we request that the user restarts with
-reindex
|
|
|
|
fadcd3f78e1dd1acd7a774f8fad68dc471ff9e1f doc: Remove irrelevant link to GitHub (MarcoFalke)
fa121b628d51bb0e25eb3fbd716881fa55527dc7 blockstorage: [refactor] Use chainman reference where possible (MarcoFalke)
fa0c7d9ad24d3c9515d3f9c136af4071cbd79055 move-only: Move *Disk functions to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
fa91b2b2b3447a3645e7958c7dc4e1946a69cb9c move-only: Move AbortNode to shutdown (MarcoFalke)
fa413f07a14744e7d7f7746e861aabd9cf938f61 move-only: Move ThreadImport to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
faf843c07f99f91603e08ea858f972516f1d669a refactor: Move load block thread into ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This picks up the closed pull request #21030 and is the first step toward fixing #21220.
The basic idea is to move all disk access into a separate module with benefits:
* Breaking down the massive files init.cpp and validation.cpp into logical units
* Creating a standalone-module to reduce the mental complexity
* Pave the way to fix validation related circular dependencies
* Pave the way to mock disk access for testing, especially where it is performance critical (like fuzzing)
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fadcd3f78e, checked (almost) moved only changes. This is a nice tidy up change and doesn't change behavior. Easily reviewed commit by commit.
jamesob:
ACK fadcd3f78e1dd1acd7a774f8fad68dc471ff9e1f ([`jamesob/ackr/21575.1.MarcoFalke.refactor_create_blocksto`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21575.1.MarcoFalke.refactor_create_blocksto))
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fadcd3f78e1dd1acd7a774f8fad68dc471ff9e1f. New organization makes sense, moves extraneous things outside of validation.cpp. PR is also easy to review with helpfully split up moveonly commits.
Tree-SHA512: 917996592b6d8f9998289d8cb2b1b78b23d1fdb3b07216c9caec1380df33baa09dc2c1e706da669d440b497e79c9c62a01ca20dc202df5ad974a75f3ef7a143b
|
|
|
|
Can be reviewed with the git options
--color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space
|
|
|
|
|
|
ebc4ab721b0371c0ef217c0f5bd7d42613e951e6 refactor: post Optional<> removal cleanups (fanquake)
57e980d13ca488031bde6ef197cf34d493d36796 scripted-diff: remove Optional & nullopt (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Same rationale & motivation as #21404, which turned out to be quite low in the number of potential conflicts. Lets see what the bot has to say here.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK ebc4ab721b0371c0ef217c0f5bd7d42613e951e6: patch looks correct
jnewbery:
utACK ebc4ab721b0371c0ef217c0f5bd7d42613e951e6
laanwj:
Code review ACK ebc4ab721b0371c0ef217c0f5bd7d42613e951e6
Tree-SHA512: 550fbeef09b9d35ddefaa805d1755c18c8fd499c4b0f77ebfece8c20296a7abd1cf6c699e2261f92fe3552deeb7555ec2a2287ffe3ab9e98bb9f8612a4d43be3
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git rm src/optional.h
sed -i -e 's/Optional</std::optional</g' $(git grep -l 'Optional<' src)
sed -i -e 's/{nullopt}/{std::nullopt}/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e 's/ nullopt;/ std::nullopt;/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e 's/ nullopt)/ std::nullopt)/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e 's/(nullopt)/(std::nullopt)/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e 's/ nullopt,/ std::nullopt,/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e 's/? nullopt :/? std::nullopt :/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e 's/: nullopt}/: std::nullopt}/g' $(git grep -l 'nullopt' src)
sed -i -e '/optional.h \\/d' src/Makefile.am
sed -i -e '/#include <optional.h>/d' src/test/fuzz/autofile.cpp src/test/fuzz/buffered_file.cpp src/test/fuzz/node_eviction.cpp
sed -i -e 's/#include <optional.h>/#include <optional>/g' $(git grep -l '#include <optional.h>' src)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
|
|
Leftover from last bundle.
|
|
...instead of recursively locking unconditionally
|
|
CChainState needed cuz setBlockIndexCandidates
|
|
- InvalidChainFound
- CheckForkWarningConditions
|
|
|
|
Tip: versionbitscache is currently a global so we didn't need to pass it
in to any of ::VersionBitsTip*'s callers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84716b134e9afca2fba7731de4af1f22fa1b1518 Add "index/blockfilterindex -> validation -> index/blockfilterindex" to expected circular dependencies (Jonas Schnelli)
ab3a0a2fb915d8b8384c30a8b38b4b5cc35236fd Add functional test for blockfilterindex in prune-mode (Jonas Schnelli)
c286a22f7b63a8bd336d5d7606c339053ee0054b Add debug startup parameter -fastprune for more effective pruning tests (Jonas Schnelli)
5e112269c311a559bfded814d3c3c438349a1986 Avoid pruning below the blockfilterindex sync height (Jonas Schnelli)
00d57ff76854938ead800767fb673a8af46eac8e Avoid accessing nullpointer in BaseIndex::GetSummary() (Jonas Schnelli)
6abe9f5b11cd4a5ecb6caca8443fe2950a417842 Allow blockfilter in conjunction with prune (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Maintaining the blockfilterindexes in prune mode is possible and may lead to efficient p2p based rescans of wallets (restore backups, import/sweep keys) beyond the prune height (rescans not part of that PR).
This PR allows running the blockfilterindex(es) in conjunction with pruning.
* Bitcoind/Qt will shutdown during startup when missing block data has been detected ([re]enable `-blockfilterindex` when we already have pruned)
* manual block pruning is disabled during blockfilterindex sync
* auto-pruning is delayed during blockfilterindex sync
ToDos:
* [x] Functional tests
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 84716b1
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 84716b134e9afca2fba7731de4af1f22fa1b1518. Only changes since last review were suggested new FindFilesToPrune argument and test.
benthecarman:
tACK 84716b134e9afca2fba7731de4af1f22fa1b1518
Tree-SHA512: 91d832c6c562c463f7ec7655c08956385413a99a896640b9737bda0183607fac530435d03d87c3c0e70c61ccdfe73fe8f3639bc7d26d33ca7e60925ebb97d77a
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't return null snapshotblockhash values to avoid caller complexity/confusion.
|
|
Values for mainnet and testnet will be specified in a follow-up PR that can be
scrutinized accordingly. This structure is required for use in snapshot activation
logic.
|
|
53e716ea119658c28935fee24eb50090907c500e [refactor] improve style for touched code (gzhao408)
174cb5330af4b09f3a66974d3bae783ea43b190e [refactor] const ATMPArgs and non-const Workspace (gzhao408)
f82baf0762f60c2ca5ffc339b095f9271d7c2f33 [refactor] return MempoolAcceptResult (gzhao408)
9db10a55061e09021ff8ea1d6637d99f7959035f [refactor] clean up logic in testmempoolaccept (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
This is the first 4 commits of #20833, and does refactoring only. It should be relatively simple to review, and offers a few nice things:
- It makes accessing values that don't make sense (e.g. fee) when the tx is invalid an error.
- Returning `MempoolAcceptResult` from ATMP makes the interface cleaner. The caller can get a const instead of passing in a mutable "out" param.
- We don't have to be iterating through a bunch of lists for package validation, we can just return a `std::vector<MempoolAcceptResult>`.
- We don't have to refactor all ATMP call sites again if/when we want to return more stuff from it.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 53e716ea119658c28935fee24eb50090907c500e 💿
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 53e716ea119658c28935fee24eb50090907c500e
ariard:
Code Review ACK 53e716e, I did tweak a bit the touched paths to see if we had good test coverage. Didn't find holes.
Tree-SHA512: fa6ec324a08ad9e6e55948615cda324cba176255708bf0a0a0f37cedb7a75311aa334ac6f223be7d8df3c7379502b1081102b9589f9a9afa1713ad3d9ab3c24f
|
|
This creates a cleaner interface with ATMP, allows us to make results const,
and makes accessing values that don't make sense (e.g. fee when tx is
invalid) an error.
|
|
Since these chainstates are:
1. Also vulnerable to the race condition described in the previous
commit
2. Documented as having similar semantics as m_active_chainstate
we should also protect them with ::cs_main.
|