| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Interface/CScheduler thread
91504cbe0de2b74ef1aa2709761aaf0597ec66a2 rpc: `SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue` on fee estimation RPC's (ismaelsadeeq)
714523918ba2b853fc69bee6b04a33ba0c828bf5 tx fees, policy: CBlockPolicyEstimator update from `CValidationInterface` notifications (ismaelsadeeq)
dff5ad3b9944cbb56126ba37a8da180d1327ba39 CValidationInterface: modify the parameter of `TransactionAddedToMempool` (ismaelsadeeq)
91532bd38223d7d04166e05de11d0d0b55e60f13 tx fees, policy: update `CBlockPolicyEstimator::processBlock` parameter (ismaelsadeeq)
bfcd401368fc0dc43827a8969a37b7e038d5ca79 CValidationInterface, mempool: add new callback to `CValidationInterface` (ismaelsadeeq)
0889e07987294d4ef2814abfca16d8e2a0c5f541 tx fees, policy: cast with static_cast instead of C-Style cast (ismaelsadeeq)
a0e3eb7549d2ba4dd3af12b9ce65e29158f59078 tx fees, policy: bugfix: move `removeTx` into reason != `BLOCK` condition (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
This is an attempt to #11775
This Pr will enable fee estimator to listen to ValidationInterface notifications to process new transactions added and removed from the mempool.
This PR includes the following changes:
- Added a new callback to the Validation Interface `MempoolTransactionsRemovedForConnectedBlock`, which notifies listeners about the transactions that have been removed due to a new block being connected, along with the height at which the transactions were removed.
- Modified the `TransactionAddedToMempool` callback parameter to include additional information about the transaction needed for fee estimation.
- Updated `CBlockPolicyEstimator` to process transactions using` CTransactionRef` instead of `CTxMempoolEntry.`
- Implemented the `CValidationInterface` interface in `CBlockPolicyEstimater` and overridden the `TransactionAddedToMempool`, `TransactionRemovedFromMempool`, and `MempoolTransactionsRemovedForConnectedBlock` methods to receive updates from their notifications.
Prior to this PR, the fee estimator updates from the mempool, i.e whenever a new block is connected all transactions in the block that are in our mempool are going to be removed using the `removeForBlock` function in `txmempool.cpp`.
This removal triggered updates to the fee estimator. As a result, the fee estimator would block mempool's `cs` until it finished updating every time a new block was connected.
Instead of being blocked only on mempool tx removal, we were blocking on both tx removal and fee estimator updating.
If we want to further improve fee estimation, or add heavy-calulation steps to it, it is currently not viable as we would be slowing down block relay in the process
This PR is smaller in terms of the changes made compared to #11775, as it focuses solely on enabling fee estimator updates from the validationInterface/cscheduler thread notifications.
I have not split the validation interface because, as I understand it, the rationale behind the split in #11775 was to have `MempoolInterface` signals come from the mempool and `CValidationInterface` events come from validation. I believe this separation can be achieved in a separate refactoring PR when the need arises.
Also left out some commits from #11775
- Some refactoring which are no longer needed.
- Handle reorgs much better in fee estimator.
- Track witness hash malleation in fee estimator
I believe they are a separate change that can come in a follow-up after this.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 91504cbe0de2b74ef1aa2709761aaf0597ec66a2
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 91504cbe0de2b74ef1aa2709761aaf0597ec66a2
willcl-ark:
ACK 91504cbe0de2b74ef1aa2709761aaf0597ec66a2
Tree-SHA512: 846dfb9da57a8a42458827b8975722d153907fe6302ad65748d74f311e1925557ad951c3d95fe71fb90ddcc8a3710c45abb343ab86b88780871cb9c38c72c7b1
|
|
5b3ea5fa2e7f6dc1c9161ed8b74c9be4bd1e92dd refactor: Move `{MAX,DEFAULT}_SCRIPTCHECK_THREADS` constants (Hennadii Stepanov)
6e17b3168072ab77ed7170ab81327c017877133a refactor: Make `CCheckQueue` non-copyable and non-movable explicitly (Hennadii Stepanov)
8111e74653dc5c93cb510672d99048c3f741d8dc refactor: Drop unneeded declaration (Hennadii Stepanov)
9cf89f7a5b81197e38f58b24be0793b28fe41477 refactor: Make `CCheckQueue` constructor start worker threads (Hennadii Stepanov)
d03eaacbcfb276fb638db1b423113ff43bd7ec41 Make `CCheckQueue` destructor stop worker threads (Hennadii Stepanov)
be4ff3060b7b43b496dfb5a2c02b114b2b717106 Move global `scriptcheckqueue` into `ChainstateManager` class (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- makes `CCheckQueue` RAII-styled
- gets rid of the global `scriptcheckqueue`
- fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25448
The previous attempt was in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18731.
ACKs for top commit:
martinus:
ACK 5b3ea5fa2e7
achow101:
ACK 5b3ea5fa2e7f6dc1c9161ed8b74c9be4bd1e92dd
TheCharlatan:
ACK 5b3ea5fa2e7f6dc1c9161ed8b74c9be4bd1e92dd
Tree-SHA512: 45cca846e7ed107e3930149f0b616ddbaf2648d6cde381f815331b861b5d67ab39e154883ae174b8abb1dae485bc904318c50c51e5d6b46923d89de51c5eadb0
|
|
compat/assumptions.h
fa1a38470697796a1a67397a815c8f8256f59224 Move compat.h include from system.h to system.cpp (MarcoFalke)
88887531b704f3943fdb33abbdd5378ecfeee14f Move compat/assumptions.h include to one place that actually needs it (MarcoFalke)
77774110f4dd591a71441851813d59c03c9e3c78 Remove __cplusplus from compat/assumptions.h (MarcoFalke)
faa3d4f1d8ecff444be53215d72e32d71d9ce138 Remove duplicate NDEBUG check from compat/assumptions.h (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Generally, compile-time checks should be close to the code that use them. Especially, since `compat/assumptions.h` is only included in one place, where iwyu suggests to remove it.
Fix all issues:
* The `NDEBUG` check is used in `util/check`, so it is redundant in `compat/assumptions.h`.
* The `__cplusplus` check is redundant with `doc/dependencies.md` (see commit message).
* Add missing `// IWYU pragma: keep` to avoid removing the include by accident.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa1a38470697796a1a67397a815c8f8256f59224
TheCharlatan:
re-ACK fa1a38470697796a1a67397a815c8f8256f59224
theuni:
ACK fa1a38470697796a1a67397a815c8f8256f59224
Tree-SHA512: f8b6db84be5d8844a2267345c0b1405fcbc39b8b5eeaa24db5b8412a74145fe44cf188b6b0c39cc2b062690ed37ca5b4662473484afe28dbec6469e79961389b
|
|
9e58c5bcd96e7ff2062274868814ccae0626589e Use Txid in COutpoint (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
This PR changes the type of the hash of a transaction outpoint from `uint256` to `Txid`.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 9e58c5bcd96e7ff2062274868814ccae0626589e
stickies-v:
ACK 9e58c5bcd96e7ff2062274868814ccae0626589e. A sizeable diff, but very straightforward changes. Didn't see anything controversial. Left a few nits, but nothing blocking, only if you have to retouch.
TheCharlatan:
ACK 9e58c5bcd96e7ff2062274868814ccae0626589e
Tree-SHA512: 58f61ce1c58668f689513e62072a7775419c4d5af8f607669cd8cdc2e7be9645ba14af7f9e2d65da2670da3ec1ce7fc2a744037520caf799aba212fd1ac44b34
|
|
notifications
`CBlockPolicyEstimator` will implement `CValidationInterface` and
subscribe to its notification to process transactions added and removed
from the mempool.
Re-delegate calculation of `validForFeeEstimation` from validation to fee estimator.
Also clean up the validForFeeEstimation arg thats no longer needed in `CTxMempool`.
Co-authored-by: Matt Corallo <git@bluematt.me>
|
|
Create a new struct `NewMempoolTransactionInfo` that will be used as the new parameter of
`TransactionAddedToMempool` callback.
|
|
|
|
Also bump includes per suggestions from iwyu.
|
|
|
|
fields, remove some external mapTx access
4dd94ca18f6fc843137ffca3e6d3e97e4f19377b [refactor] remove access to mapTx in validation_block_tests (TheCharlatan)
d0cd2e804ec9b278ed9699c2ae48574b1c1613b1 [refactor] rewrite BlockAssembler inBlock and failedTx as sets of txids (glozow)
55b0939cab49d50ca5bc59105b669e379d5e7f6c scripted-diff: rename vTxHashes to txns_randomized (TheCharlatan)
a03aef9cec35b0d03aa63d7e8093f0420cd4b40b [refactor] rewrite vTxHashes as a vector of CTransactionRef (glozow)
938643c3b2b8e7b9aec1df34a2f8a95d616d8dd5 [refactor] remove access to mapTx in validation.cpp (glozow)
333367a9407701b5077e2457b1a6aa8ff5e4934b [txmempool] make CTxMemPoolEntry::lockPoints mutable (glozow)
1bf4855016e777dd8b424fe01750f9e3e97931a2 [refactor] use CheckPackageLimits for checkChainLimits (glozow)
dbc5bdbf595e9dd0330493645ebff0b8696192a3 [refactor] remove access to mapTx.find in mempool_tests.cpp (glozow)
f80909e7a31523d8f197fd650b138b9f228cd13f [refactor] remove access to mapTx in blockencodings_tests.cpp (glozow)
8892d6b744e3cbda2cf93721f573ffa7017bd898 [refactor] remove access to mapTx from rpc/mempool.cpp (glozow)
fad61aa56189f98d97af1d6f70c4eb46b8f98bf0 [refactor] get wtxid from entry instead of vTxHashes (glozow)
9cd8cafb77563243af19c95e396c2fb4fc3758df [refactor] use exists() instead of mapTx.find() (glozow)
14804699e59794e61dcfb02ff1971db96e9a06ce [refactor] remove access to mapTx from policy/rbf.cpp (glozow)
1c6a73abbd1fb773c7d0036beb952b95dde8e38b [refactor] Add helper for retrieving mempool entry (TheCharlatan)
453b4813ebc74859864803e9972b58e4be76a4d6 [refactor] Add helper for iterating through mempool entries (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Motivation
* It seems preferable to use stdlib data structures instead of boost if they can achieve close to the same thing.
* Code external to mempool should ideally use its public helper methods instead of accessing `mapTx` or its iterators directly.
* Reduce the number of complex boost multi index type interactions
* Also see #28335 for further context/motivation. This PR together with #28385 simplifies that one.
Overview of things done in this PR:
* Make `vTxHashes` a vector of transaction references instead of a pair of transaction hash and iterator. The trade off here is that the data is retrieved on the fly with `GetEntry` instead of being cached in `vTxHashes`.
* Introduce `GetEntry` helper method to replace the more involved `GetIter` where applicable
* Replace `mapTx` access with `CTxMemPool` helper methods
* Simplify `checkChainLimits` call in `node/interfaces.cpp`
* Make `CTxMemPoolEntry`s `lockPoints`mutable such that they can be changed with a const iterator directly instead of going through `mapTx`
* Make `BlockAssembler`'s `inBlock` and `failedTx` sets of transaction hashes.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK 4dd94ca
maflcko:
re-ACK 4dd94ca18f6fc843137ffca3e6d3e97e4f19377b 👝
stickies-v:
re-ACK 4dd94ca18f6fc843137ffca3e6d3e97e4f19377b
Tree-SHA512: c4d043f2186e4fde337591883fac66cade3058173987b49502bd65cecf69207a3df1077f6626809652ab63230013167b7f39a2b39f1c5166959e5495df57065f
|
|
|
|
|
|
In places where the iterator is only needed for accessing the actual
entry, it should not be required to first retrieve the iterator.
|
|
With subpackage evaluation and de-duplication, it's not always the
entire package that is used in CheckFeerate. To be more helpful to the
caller, specify which transactions were included in the evaluation and
what the feerate was.
Instead of PCKG_POLICY (which is supposed to be for package-wide
errors), use PCKG_TX.
|
|
With package validation rules, transactions that fail individually may
sometimes be eligible for reconsideration if submitted as part of a
(different) package. For now, that includes trasactions that failed for
being too low feerate. Add a new TxValidationResult type to distinguish
these failures from others. In the next commits, we will abort package
validation if a tx fails for any other reason. In the future, we will
also decide whether to cache failures in recent_rejects based on this
result (we won't want to reject a package containing a transaction that
was rejected previously for being low feerate).
Package validation also sometimes elects to skip some transactions when
it knows the package will not be submitted in order to quit sooner. Add
a result to specify this situation; we also don't want to cache these
as rejections.
|
|
|
|
b5a60abe8783852f5b31bc1e63b5836530410e65 MOVEONLY: CleanupTemporaryCoins into its own function (glozow)
10c0a8678cd28e7f0715e6cfa3e651903e4ad4aa [test util] CreateValidTransaction multi-in/out, configurable feerate, signal BIP125 (glozow)
6ff647a7e0d85040a6033047c5cf84f8f22b1c65 scripted-diff: rename CheckPackage to IsWellFormedPackage (glozow)
da9aceba217bbded6909f06144eaa1e1a4ebcb69 [refactor] move package checks into helper functions (glozow)
Pull request description:
This is part of #27463. It splits off the more trivial changes from #26711 for ease of review, as requested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26711#issuecomment-1786392253.
- Split package sanitization in policy/packages.h into helper functions
- Add some tests for its quirks (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26711#discussion_r1340521597)
- Rename `CheckPackage` to `IsPackageWellFormed`
- Improve the `CreateValidTransaction` unit test utility to:
- Configure the target feerate and return the fee paid
- Signal BIP125 on transactions to enable RBF tests
- Allow the specification of multiple inputs and outputs
- Move `CleanupTemporaryCoins` into its own function to be reused later without duplication
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
Code review ACK b5a60abe8783852f5b31bc1e63b5836530410e65
instagibbs:
ACK b5a60abe8783852f5b31bc1e63b5836530410e65
Tree-SHA512: 39d67a5f0041e381f0d0f802a98ccffbff11e44daa3a49611189d6306b03f18613d5ff16c618898d490c97a216753e99e0db231ff14d327f92c17ae4d269cfec
|
|
rewrite followups
9b3da70bd06b45482e7211aa95637a72bd115553 [test] DisconnectedBlockTransactions::DynamicMemoryUsage (glozow)
b2d04479647af64ad7cf5ebfb6175251b2f6b72e bugfix: correct DisconnectedBlockTransactions memory usage (stickies-v)
f4254e209801d6a790b5f0c251c0b32154a4e3cc assume duplicate transactions are not added to `iters_by_txid` (ismaelsadeeq)
29eb219c1247993378fce06c8f71aab20736c237 move only: move implementation code to disconnected_transactions.cpp (ismaelsadeeq)
81dfeddea70ae5feeaf79062585c2ff9f33c0ca3 refactor: update `MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL` from kb to bytes (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to fix review comments and a bugfix from #28385
The PR
- Updated `DisconnectedBlockTransactions`'s `MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL` from kb to bytes.
- Moved `DisconnectedBlockTransactions` implementation code to `kernel/disconnected_transactions.cpp`.
- `AddTransactionsFromBlock` now assume duplicate transactions are not passed by asserting after inserting each transaction to `iters_by_txid`.
- Included a Bug fix: In the current master we are underestimating the memory usage of `DisconnectedBlockTransactions`.
* When adding and subtracting `cachedInnerUsage` we call `RecursiveDynamicUsage` with `CTransaction` which invokes this [`RecursiveDynamicUsage(const CTransaction& tx)`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/6e721c923c87abdb8d99674093d08d8c17bc52c2/src/core_memusage.h#L32) version of `RecursiveDynamicUsage`, the output of that call only account for the memory usage of the inputs and outputs of the `CTransaction`, this omits the memory usage of the `CTransaction` object and the control block.
* This PR fixes this bug by calling `RecursiveDynamicUsage` with `CTransactionRef` when adding and subtracting `cachedInnerUsage` which invokes [`RecursiveDynamicUsage(const std::shared_ptr<X>& p)`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/6e721c923c87abdb8d99674093d08d8c17bc52c2/src/core_memusage.h#L67) version of `RecursiveDynamicUsage` the output of the calculation accounts for the` CTransaction` object, the control blocks, inputs and outputs memory usage.
* see [comment ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28385#discussion_r1322948452)
- Added test for DisconnectedBlockTransactions memory limit.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK 9b3da70bd06b45482e7211aa95637a72bd115553 - nice work!
BrandonOdiwuor:
re ACK 9b3da70bd06b45482e7211aa95637a72bd115553
glozow:
ACK 9b3da70bd06b45482e7211aa95637a72bd115553
Tree-SHA512: 69b9595d09f4d0209038f97081d790cea92ccf63efb94e9e372749979fcbe527f7f17a8e454720cedd12021be0c8e11cf99874625d3dafd9ec602b12dbeb4098
|
|
Avoid duplicate code. This will be used at the end of every
AcceptSubPackage and after PreChecks loop in AcceptPackage.
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/CheckPackage(/IsWellFormedPackage(/g' $(git grep -l CheckPackage)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
This allows IsSorted() and IsConsistent() to be used by themselves.
IsSorted() with a precomputed set is used so that we don't create this
set multiple times.
|
|
|
|
faa769db5a4c16fd171e9a39c33e245db4e7c134 Fix bugprone-lambda-function-name errors (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Inside a lambda, `__func__` will evaluate to something like `"operator()"`. Fix this by either removing it, or by using the real name.
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/lambda-function-name.html
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK faa769db5a4c16fd171e9a39c33e245db4e7c134
darosior:
utACK faa769db5a4c16fd171e9a39c33e245db4e7c134
Tree-SHA512: 0b562bd4ebd7f46ca3ebabeee67851ad30bd522fa57e5010e833b163664e51f5df645ff9ca35d22c3479fb27d9267d4e5d0d417d42729bf3ccf80d7944970e4e
|
|
940a49978c70453e1aaf2c4a0bcb382872b844a5 Use type-safe txid types in orphanage (dergoegge)
ed70e6501648466b9ca91a39b83775363e9a726d Introduce types for txids & wtxids (dergoegge)
cdb14d79e809bf7d1612b21b554a9fcfb2ab1c91 [net processing] Use HasWitness over comparing (w)txids (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
We currently have two different identifiers for transactions: `txid` (refering to the hash of a transaction without witness data) and `wtxid` (referring to the hash of a transaction including witness data). Both are typed as `uint256` which could lead to type-safety bugs in which one transaction identifier type is passed where the other would be expected.
This PR introduces explicit `Txid` and `Wtxid` types that (if used) would cause compilation errors for such type confusion bugs.
(Only the orphanage is converted to use these types in this PR)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 940a49978c70453e1aaf2c4a0bcb382872b844a5
stickies-v:
ACK 940a49978c70453e1aaf2c4a0bcb382872b844a5
hebasto:
ACK 940a49978c70453e1aaf2c4a0bcb382872b844a5, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
instagibbs:
re-ACK 940a49978c70453e1aaf2c4a0bcb382872b844a5
BrandonOdiwuor:
re-ACK 940a49978c70453e1aaf2c4a0bcb382872b844a5
glozow:
reACK 940a49978c
Tree-SHA512: 55298d1c2bb82b7a6995e96e554571c22eaf4a89fb2a4d7a236d70e0f625e8cca62ff2490e1c179c47bd93153fe6527b56870198f026f5ee7753d64d7a424c92
|
|
Can be reviewed with
--color-moved=dimmed-zebra
|
|
|
|
a snapshot chainstate
ec84f999f1408b7f1ff4498f78c33b34c30e934c log: Don't log cache rebalancing in absense of a snapshot chainstate (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
I have noticed that this log now is always printed, even if there is no snapshot chainstate present or even was present. I think this is confusing to users that have never even thought about using assumeutxo since in that case the rebalancing is just ensuring the normal environment with one chainstate. So I suggest we don't log in absence of a snapshot chainstate. We could also think about rewording the message instead but I think this is simpler.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
utACK ec84f999f1408b7f1ff4498f78c33b34c30e934c
glozow:
concept ACK ec84f999f1408b7f1ff4498f78c33b34c30e934c, don't have opinions other than removing confusing log
theStack:
utACK ec84f999f1408b7f1ff4498f78c33b34c30e934c
Tree-SHA512: 30bbfc648e7c788106f78d52e47a3aa1e1874f65d13743643dc50bcf7f450d8330711ff9fdeac361722542da6051533153829c6d49033227ed315e111afc899f
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
|
|
|
|
of regtest
5b878be742dbfcd232d949d2df1fff4743aec3d8 [doc] add release note for submitpackage (glozow)
7a9bb2a2a59ba49f80519c8435229abec2432486 [rpc] allow submitpackage to be called outside of regtest (glozow)
5b9087a9a7da2602485e85e0b163dc3cbd2daf31 [rpc] require package to be a tree in submitpackage (glozow)
e32ba1599c599e75b1da3393f71f633de860505f [txpackages] IsChildWithParentsTree() (glozow)
b4f28cc345ef9c5261c4a8d743654a44784c7802 [doc] parent pay for child in aggregate CheckFeeRate (glozow)
Pull request description:
Permit (restricted topology) submitpackage RPC outside of regtest. Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26933#issuecomment-1510851570
This RPC should be safe but still experimental - interface may change, not all features (e.g. package RBF) are implemented, etc. If a miner wants to expose this to people, they can effectively use "package relay" before the p2p changes are implemented. However, please note **this is not package relay**; transactions submitted this way will not relay to other nodes if the feerates are below their mempool min fee. Users should put this behind some kind of rate limit or permissions.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 5b878be742dbfcd232d949d2df1fff4743aec3d8
achow101:
ACK 5b878be742dbfcd232d949d2df1fff4743aec3d8
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 5b878be742dbfcd232d949d2df1fff4743aec3d8
ajtowns:
ACK 5b878be742dbfcd232d949d2df1fff4743aec3d8
ariard:
Code Review ACK 5b878be742. Though didn’t manually test the PR.
Tree-SHA512: 610365c0b2ffcccd55dedd1151879c82de1027e3319712bcb11d54f2467afaae4d05dca5f4b25f03354c80845fef538d3938b958174dda8b14c10670537a6524
|
|
The check is already done in util/check.h, which is more widely
included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This ensures that we avoid any unexpected conditions inherent in
transferring non-empty mempools across chainstates.
Note that this should never happen in practice given that snapshot
activation will not occur outside of IBD, based upon the height checks
in `loadtxoutset`.
|
|
Most easily reviewed with
git show --color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
|
|
Otherwise we will not receive transactions during background sync until
restart.
|
|
When using an assumedvalid (snapshot) chainstate along with a background
chainstate, we are syncing two very different regions of the chain
simultaneously. If we use the same blockfile space for both of these
syncs, wildly different height blocks will be stored alongside one
another, making pruning ineffective.
This change implements a separate blockfile cursor for the assumedvalid
chainstate when one is in use.
|
|
Use the expected AssumeutxoData in order to bootstrap nChainTx values
for assumedvalid blockindex entries in the snapshot chainstate. This
is necessary because nChainTx is normally built up from nTx values,
which are populated using blockdata which the snapshot chainstate
does not yet have.
|
|
In future commits, loading the block index while making use of a
snapshot is contingent on the snapshot being recognized by chainparams.
Ensure all existing unittests that use snapshots use a recognized
snapshot (at height 110).
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
|
|
Introduces ChainstateManager::GetPruneRange().
The prune budget is split evenly between the number of chainstates,
however the prune budget may be exceeded if the resulting shares are
beneath `MIN_DISK_SPACE_FOR_BLOCK_FILES`.
|
|
When using an assumedvalid chainstate, only process validationinterface
callbacks from the background chainstate within indexes. This ensures
that all indexes are built in-order.
Later, we can possibly designate indexes which can be built out of order
and continue their operation during snapshot use.
Once the background sync has completed, restart the indexes so that
they continue to index the now-validated snapshot chainstate.
|
|
This allows consumers to decide how to handle events from background or
assumedvalid chainstates.
|
