| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors
|
|
fa818e103c0ddb515f29ae9ce8de44931e12e69e txmempool: Remove unused clear() member function (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to have code in Bitcoin Core that is unused.
Moreover the function was broken (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24145) and is brittle, as there is nothing that prevents similar bugs from re-appearing.
Fix both issues by replacing it with C++11 member initializers.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK fa818e103c0ddb515f29ae9ce8de44931e12e69e
Tree-SHA512: e79e44cac7d5a84d9ecc8e3f3b0b9a50e1e3ebec358b20ba5dac175ef07d1fbe338a20f83ee80f746f7c726c79e77f8be49e14bca57a41063da8a5302123c3a9
|
|
ancestors
47c4b1f52ab8d95d7deef83050bad49d1e3e5990 mempool: log/halt when CalculateMemPoolAncestors fails unexpectedly (stickies-v)
5481f65849313ff947f38433b1ac28285a7f7694 mempool: add AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors helper function (stickies-v)
f911bdfff95eba3793fffaf71a31cc8bfc6f80c9 mempool: use util::Result for CalculateMemPoolAncestors (stickies-v)
66e028f7399b6511f9b73b1cef54b6a6ac38a024 mempool: use util::Result for CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Upon reviewing the documentation for `CTxMemPool::CalculateMemPoolAncestors`, I noticed `setAncestors` was meant to be an `out` parameter but actually is an `in,out` parameter, as can be observed by adding `assert(setAncestors.empty());` as the first line in the function and running `make check`. This PR fixes this unexpected behaviour and introduces refactoring improvements to make intents and effects of the code more clear.
## Unexpected behaviour
This behaviour occurs only in the package acceptance path, currently only triggered by `testmempoolaccept` and `submitpackage` RPCs.
In `MemPoolAccept::AcceptMultipleTransactions()`, we first call `PreChecks()` and then `SubmitPackage()` with the same `Workspace ws` reference. `PreChecks` leaves `ws.m_ancestors` in a potentially non-empty state, before it is passed on to `MemPoolAccept::SubmitPackage`. `SubmitPackage` is the only place where `setAncestors` isn't guaranteed to be empty before calling `CalculateMemPoolAncestors`. The most straightforward fix is to just forcefully clear `setAncestors` at the beginning of CalculateMemPoolAncestors, which is done in the first bugfix commit.
## Improvements
### Return value instead of out-parameters
This PR updates the function signatures for `CTxMemPool::CalculateMemPoolAncestors` and `CTxMemPool::CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits` to use a `util::Result` return type and eliminate both the `setAncestors` `in,out`-parameter as well as the error string. It simplifies the code and makes the intent and effects more explicit.
### Observability
There are 7 instances where we currently call `CalculateMemPoolAncestors` without actually checking if the function succeeded because we assume that it can't fail, such as in [miner.cpp](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/69b10212ea5370606c7a5aa500a70c36b4cbb58f/src/node/miner.cpp#L399). This PR adds a new wrapper `AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors` function that logs such unexpected failures, or in case of debug builds even halts the program. It's not crucial to the objective, more of an observability improvement that seems sensible to add on here.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 47c4b1f52ab8d95d7deef83050bad49d1e3e5990
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26289/commits/47c4b1f52ab8d95d7deef83050bad49d1e3e5990
glozow:
ACK 47c4b1f52ab8d95d7deef83050bad49d1e3e5990
furszy:
light code review ACK 47c4b1f5
aureleoules:
ACK 47c4b1f52ab8d95d7deef83050bad49d1e3e5990
Tree-SHA512: d908dad00d1a5645eb865c4877cc0bae74b9cd3332a3641eb4a285431aef119f9fc78172d38b55c592168a73dae83242e6af3348815f7b37cbe2d448a3a58648
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Commits of previous years:
- 2021: f47dda2c58b5d8d623e0e7ff4e74bc352dfa83d7
- 2020: fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
- 2019: aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
|
|
When CalculateMemPoolAncestors fails unexpectedly (e.g. it exceeds
ancestor/descendant limits even though we expect no limits to be applied),
add an error log entry for increased visibility. For debug builds,
the application will even halt completely since this is not supposed
to happen.
|
|
There are quite a few places that assume CalculateMemPoolAncestors
will return a value without raising an error. This helper function
adds logging (and Assume for debug builds) that ensures robustness
but increases visibility in case of unexpected failures
|
|
Avoid using setAncestors outparameter, simplify function signatures
and avoid creating unused dummy strings.
|
|
|
|
Avoid using setAncestors outparameter, simplify function signatures
and avoid creating unused dummy strings.
|
|
dependencies
c8dc0e3eaa9e0f956c5177bcb69632beb0d51770 refactor: Inline `CTxMemPoolEntry` class's functions (Hennadii Stepanov)
75bbe594e54402ed248ecf2bdfe54e8283d20fff refactor: Move `CTxMemPoolEntry` class to its own module (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- gets rid of the `policy/fees` -> `txmempool` -> `policy/fees` circular dependency
- is an alternative to #13949, which nukes only one circular dependency
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK c8dc0e3eaa9e0f956c5177bcb69632beb0d51770. Just include and whitespace changes since last review, and there's a moveonly commit now so it's very easy to review
theStack:
Code-review ACK c8dc0e3eaa9e0f956c5177bcb69632beb0d51770
glozow:
utACK c8dc0e3eaa9e0f956c5177bcb69632beb0d51770, agree these changes are an improvement.
Tree-SHA512: 36ece824e6ed3ab1a1e198b30a906c8ac12de24545f840eb046958a17315ac9260c7de26e11e2fbab7208adc3d74918db7a7e389444130f8810548ca2e81af41
|
|
This change nukes the policy/fees->mempool circular dependency.
Easy to review using `diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
|
|
Currently the exact reason a transaction is removed from the mempool isn't
logged. It is sometimes detectable from context, but adding the `reason` to
the validation interface logs (where it is already passed) seems like an easy
way to disambiguate.
For example, in the case of mempool expiry, the logs look like this:
```
[validationinterface.cpp:220] [TransactionRemovedFromMempool] [validation] Enqueuing TransactionRemovedFromMempool: txid=<txid> wtxid=<wtxid>
[txmempool.cpp:1050] [RemoveUnbroadcastTx] [mempool] Removed <txid> from set of unbroadcast txns before confirmation that txn was sent out
[validationinterface.cpp:220] [operator()] [validation] TransactionRemovedFromMempool: txid=<txid> wtxid=<wtxid>
[validation.cpp:267] [LimitMempoolSize] [mempool] Expired 1 transactions from the memory pool
```
There is no context-free way to know $txid was evicted on the basis of expiry.
This change will make that case (and probably others) clear.
|
|
33b12e5df6aa14344dd084e0c6f2d34158fca383 docs: improve docs where MemPoolLimits is used (stickies-v)
6945853c0bf3b1941bfd18b5ffbd5a81be0e56da test: use NoLimits() in MempoolIndexingTest (stickies-v)
3a86f24a4c1e4e985b1d90eddc135b8dd17049a4 refactor: mempool: use CTxMempool::Limits (stickies-v)
b85af25f8770974bae4ef3fae64e75ef6dd2d3c2 refactor: mempool: add MemPoolLimits::NoLimits() (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Mempool currently considers 4 limits regarding ancestor and descendant count and size, which get passed around between functions quite a bit. This PR uses `CTxMemPool::Limits` introduced in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25290 to simplify those signatures and callsites.
The purpose of this PR is to improve readability and maintenance, without behaviour change.
As noted in the first commit "refactor: mempool: change MemPoolLimits members to uint", we currently have an underflow issue where a user could pass a negative `-limitancestorsize`, which is eventually cast to an unsigned integer. This behaviour already exists. Because it's orthogonal and to minimize scope, I think this should be fixed in a separate PR.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 33b12e5df6aa14344dd084e0c6f2d34158fca383, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
glozow:
reACK 33b12e5df6aa14344dd084e0c6f2d34158fca383
Tree-SHA512: 591c6dcee1894f1c3ca28b34a680eeadcf0d40cda92451b4a422c03087b27d682b5e30ba4367abd75a99b5ccb115b7884b0026958d3c7dddab030549db5a4056
|
|
|
|
Simplifies function signatures by removing repetition of all the
ancestor/descendant limits, and increases readability by being
more verbose by naming the limits, while still reducing the LoC.
|
|
These were introduced in commit 5add7a7, when the codebase was
pre-C++11. They are no longer necessary.
|
|
|
|
Each alias is only used in one place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also change the param name for SetLoadTried to load_tried.
|
|
m_is_loaded/IsLoaded() doesn't actually indicate whether or not the
mempool was successfully, loaded, but rather if a load has been
attempted and did not result in a catastrophic ShutdownRequested.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
find_regex="\bm_is_loaded\b" \
&& git grep -l -E "$find_regex" \
| xargs sed -i -E "s@$find_regex@m_load_tried@g"
find_regex="\bIsLoaded\b" \
&& git grep -l -E "$find_regex" \
| xargs sed -i -E "s@$find_regex@GetLoadTried@g"
find_regex="\bSetIsLoaded\b" \
&& git grep -l -E "$find_regex" \
| xargs sed -i -E "s@$find_regex@SetLoadTried@g"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
This new node policy setting enables to accept replaced-by-fee
transaction without inspection of the replaceability signaling
as described in BIP125 "explicit signaling".
If turns on, the node mempool accepts transaction replacement
as described in `policy/mempool-replacements.md`.
The default setting value is `false`, implying opt-in RBF
is enforced.
|
|
`ArgsManager`
d1684beabe5b738c2cc83de83e1aaef11a761b69 fees: Pass in a filepath instead of referencing gArgs (Carl Dong)
9a3d825c30e8e6118d74a4e568744cb9d03f7f5d init: Remove redundant -*mempool*, -limit* queries (Carl Dong)
6c5c60c4124293d948735756f84efc85262ea66f mempool: Use m_limit for UpdateTransactionsFromBlock (Carl Dong)
9e93b1030182eff92ef91181e17c7dd498c7e164 node/ifaces: Use existing MemPoolLimits (Carl Dong)
38af2bcf358a72b9457d370282e57f4be1c5c849 mempoolaccept: Use limits from mempool in constructor (Carl Dong)
9333427014695ac235c96d48791098168dfdc9db mempool: Introduce (still-unused) MemPoolLimits (Carl Dong)
716bb5fbd31077bbe99d11a54d6c2c250afc8085 scripted-diff: Rename anc/desc size limit vars to indicate SI unit (Carl Dong)
1ecc77321deb61b9f6888e4e10752b9d972fd26e scripted-diff: Rename DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY to indicate time unit (Carl Dong)
aa9141cd8185cb7ad532bc16feb9d302b05d9697 mempool: Pass in -mempoolexpiry instead of referencing gArgs (Carl Dong)
51c7a41a5eb6fcb60333812c770d80227cf7b64d init: Only determine maxmempool once (Carl Dong)
386c9472c8764738282e6d163b42e15a8feda7ea mempool: Make GetMinFee() with custom size protected (Carl Dong)
82f00de7a6a60cbc9ad0c6e1d0ffb1bc70c49af5 mempool: Pass in -maxmempool instead of referencing gArgs (Carl Dong)
f1941e8bfd2eecc478c7660434b1ebf6a64095a0 pool: Add and use MemPoolOptions, ApplyArgsManOptions (Carl Dong)
0199bd35bb44e32ee0db9b51c9d1bd7518c26f19 fuzz/rbf: Add missing TestingSetup (Carl Dong)
ccbaf546a68d6cda8ed3efd0598c0e4121b366bb scripted-diff: Rename DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE to indicate SI unit (Carl Dong)
fc02f77ca604f0221171bfde3059b34f5d0fb1cd ArgsMan: Add Get*Arg functions returning optional (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project: #24303, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18
-----
As mentioned in the Stage 1 Step 2 description of [the `libbitcoinkernel` project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24303), `ArgsManager` will not be part of `libbitcoinkernel`. Therefore, it is important that we remove any dependence on `ArgsManager` by code that will be part of `libbitcoinkernel`. This is the first in a series of PRs aiming to achieve this.
This PR removes `CTxMemPool+MempoolAccept`'s dependency on `ArgsManager` by introducing a `CTxMemPool::Options` struct, which is used to specify `CTxMemPool`'s various options at construction time.
These options are:
- `-maxmempool` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::max_size`
- `-mempoolexpiry` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::expiry`
- `-limitancestorcount` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::limits::ancestor_count`
- `-limitancestorsize` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::limits::ancestor_size`
- `-limitdescendantcount` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::limits::descendant_count`
- `-limitdescendantsize` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::limits::descendant_size`
More context can be gleaned from the commit messages. The important commits are:
- 56eb479ded8bfb2ef635bb6f3b484f9d5952c70d "pool: Add and use MemPoolOptions, ApplyArgsManOptions"
- a1e08b70f3068f4e8def1c630d8f50cd54da7832 "mempool: Pass in -maxmempool instead of referencing gArgs"
- 6f4bf3ede5812b374828f08fc728ceded2f10024 "mempool: Pass in -mempoolexpiry instead of referencing gArgs"
- 5958a7fe4806599fc620ee8c1a881ca10fa2dd16 "mempool: Introduce (still-unused) MemPoolLimits"
Reviewers: Help needed in the following commits (see commit messages):
- a1e08b70f3068f4e8def1c630d8f50cd54da7832 "mempool: Pass in -maxmempool instead of referencing gArgs"
- 0695081a797e9a5d7787b78b0f8289dafcc6bff7 "node/ifaces: Use existing MemPoolLimits"
Note to Reviewers: There are perhaps an infinite number of ways to architect `CTxMemPool::Options`, the current one tries to keep it simple, usable, and flexible. I hope we don't spend too much time arguing over the design here since that's not the point. In the case that you're 100% certain that a different design is strictly better than this one in every regard, please show us a fully-implemented branch.
-----
TODO:
- [x] Use the more ergonomic `CTxMemPool::Options` where appropriate
- [x] Doxygen comments for `ApplyArgsManOptions`, `MemPoolOptions`
-----
Questions for Reviewers:
1. Should we use `std::chrono::seconds` for `CTxMemPool::Options::expiry` and `CTxMemPool::m_expiry` instead of an `int64_t`? Something else? (`std::chrono::hours`?)
2. Should I merge `CTxMemPool::Limits` inside `CTxMemPool::Options`?
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK d1684beabe5b738c2cc83de83e1aaef11a761b69 🍜
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d1684beabe5b738c2cc83de83e1aaef11a761b69. Just minor cleanups since last review, mostly switching to brace initialization
Tree-SHA512: 2c138e52d69f61c263f1c3648f01c801338a8f576762c815f478ef5148b8b2f51e91ded5c1be915e678c0b14f6cfba894b82afec58d999d39a7bb7c914736e0b
|
|
Since:
- UpdateTransactionsFromBlock is only called by
MaybeUpdateMempoolForReorg, which calls it with the gArgs-determined
ancestor limits
- UpdateForDescendants is only called by UpdateTransactionsFromBlock
with the ancestor limits unchanged
We can remove the requirement to specify the ancestor limits for both
UpdateTransactionsFromBlock and UpdateForDescendants and just use the
values in the m_limits member.
Also move some removed comments to MemPoolLimits struct members.
The uint64_t cast in UpdateForDescendants is not new behavior,
see the diff in CChainState::MaybeUpdateMempoolForReorg for where they
were previously.
|
|
They live as a CTxMemPool member.
[META] These limits will be used in subsequent commits to replace calls
to gArgs.
|
|
- Store the mempool expiry (-mempoolexpiry) in CTxMemPool as a
std::chrono::seconds member.
- Remove the requirement to explicitly specify a mempool expiry for
LimitMempoolSize(...), just use the newly-introduced member.
- Remove all now-unnecessary instances of:
std::chrono::hours{gArgs.GetIntArg("-mempoolexpiry", DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY)}
|
|
- Store the mempool size limit (-maxmempool) in CTxMemPool as a member.
- Remove the requirement to explicitly specify a mempool size limit for
CTxMemPool::GetMinFee(...) and LimitMempoolSize(...), just use the
stored mempool size limit where possible.
- Remove all now-unnecessary instances of:
gArgs.GetIntArg("-maxmempool", DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE_MB) * 1000000
The code change in CChainState::GetCoinsCacheSizeState() is correct
since the coinscache should not repurpose "extra" mempool memory
headroom for itself if the mempool doesn't even exist.
|
|
Reviewers: Note that CTxMemPool now requires a non-defaulted
CTxMemPool::Options for its constructor. Meaning that there's no need to
worry about a stray CTxMemPool constructor somewhere defaulting to
something incorrect. All instances of CTxMemPool construction are
addressed here in this commit.
We set options for CTxMemPool and construct it in many different ways. A
good example can be seen in how we determine CTxMemPool's check_ratio in
AppInitMain(...).
1. We first set the default based on chainparams's
DefaultConsistencyChecks()
2. Then, we apply the ArgsManager option on top of that default
3. Finally, we clamp the result of that between 0 and 1 Million
With this patch, most CTxMemPool construction are along the lines of:
MemPoolOptions mempool_opts{...default overrides...};
ApplyArgsManOptions(argsman, mempool_opts);
...hard overrides...
CTxMemPool pool{mempool_opts};
This "compositional" style of building options means that we can omit
unnecessary/irrelevant steps wherever we want but also maintain full
customizability.
For example:
- For users of libbitcoinkernel, where we eventually want to remove
ArgsManager, they simply won't call (or even know about)
ApplyArgsManOptions.
- See src/init.cpp to see how the check_ratio CTxMemPool option works
after this change.
A MemPoolOptionsForTest helper was also added and used by tests/fuzz
tests where a local CTxMemPool needed to be created.
The change in src/test/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp seemingly changes behaviour by
applying ArgsManager options on top of the CTxMemPool::Options defaults.
However, in future commits where we introduce flags like -maxmempool,
the call to ApplyArgsManOptions is actually what preserves the existing
behaviour. Previously, although it wasn't obvious, our CTxMemPool would
consult gArgs for flags like -maxmempool when it needed it, so it
already relied on ArgsManager information. This patchset just laid bare
the obfuscatory perils of globals.
[META] As this patchset progresses, we will move more and more
CTxMemPool-relevant options into MemPoolOptions and add their
ArgsMan-related logic to ApplyArgsManOptions.
|
|
|
|
* feeDelta tracked the delta (to be applied on top of the actual fee)
* m_modified_fee tracks the actual fee with the delta included
* Instead of passing in the new total delta to the Updater, pass in by
how much the total delta should be modified.
This is needed for the next commit, but makes sense on its own because
the same is done by UpdateDescendantState and UpdateAncestorState.
|
|
fa32cc0682a0aa3420e6a11031721fcb6c50fa44 doc: Remove fee delta TODO from txmempool.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This refactor request was added in commit eb306664e786ae43d539fde66f0fbe2a3e89d910, though it didn't explain why the refactor is needed and what the goal is. Given that this wasn't touched for more than 5 years, it doesn't seem critical. Generally, non-trivial `TODO`s make more sense as GitHub issues, so that they can be discussed and triaged more easily.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa32cc0682a0aa3420e6a11031721fcb6c50fa44
Tree-SHA512: 6629fef543e815136c82c38aa8ba2c4de68a5fe94c6954f2559e468f7e59052e02dd7c221d3b159be0314eaf0dbb18f74814297c58f76e2289c47e8d4f49be4e
|
|
9d65ad365c539557e969a35d22723d92e0b422fe Clear vTxHashes when mapTx is cleared (Peter Bushnell)
Pull request description:
vTxHashes is a vector of all entries in mapTx, if you clear one you should clear the other, lest someone try to use the txiter in vTxHashes which would result in a segfault.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 9d65ad365c539557e969a35d22723d92e0b422fe
Tree-SHA512: 6832755e43ab7f528b46817aeadcb6ffdc965b97f59ab96bb053dedbb7e68155ba3db52286355dca33b509237f80eda249760b26db493762bc50d8e2cef16d8f
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c5b36b1c1b11f04e5da7fb44183f61d09a14e40d Mempool Update Cut-Through Optimization (Jeremy Rubin)
c49daf9885e86ba08acdc8332d2a34bc5951a487 [TESTS] Increase limitancestorcount in tournament RPC test to showcase improved algorithm (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Often when we're updating mempool entries we update entries that we ultimately end up removing the updated entries shortly thereafter. This patch makes it so that we filter for such entries a bit earlier in processing, which yields a mild improvement for these cases, and is negligible overhead otherwise.
There's potential for a better -- but more sophisticated -- algorithm that can be used taking advantage of epochs, but I figured it is better to do something that is simple and works first and upgrade it later as the other epoch mempool work proceeds as it makes the patches for the epoch algorithm simpler to understand, so you can consider this as preparatory work. It could either go in now if it is not controversial, or we could wait until the other patch is ready to go.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK c5b36b1
sipa:
utACK c5b36b1c1b11f04e5da7fb44183f61d09a14e40d
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK c5b36b1c1b11f04e5da7fb44183f61d09a14e40d
Tree-SHA512: 78b16864f77a637d8a68a65e23c019a9757d8b2243486728ef601d212ae482f6084cf8e69d810958c356f1803178046e4697207ba40d6d10529ca57de647fae6
|
|
reorg
b4adc5ad6769e4a5a6179dfff271cd4c9dc47a5b [bugfix] update lockpoints correctly during reorg (glozow)
b6002b07a36f0d58dc6becd04bfcf78599056b7c MOVEONLY: update_lock_points to txmempool.h (glozow)
Pull request description:
I introduced a bug in #22677 (sorry! :sweat_smile:)
Mempool entries cache `LockPoints`, containing the first height/blockhash/`CBlockIndex*` at which the transaction becomes valid. During a reorg, we re-check timelocks on all mempool entries using `CheckSequenceLocks(useExistingLockPoints=false)` and remove any now-invalid entries. `CheckSequenceLocks()` also mutates the `LockPoints` passed in, and we update valid entries' `LockPoints` using `update_lock_points`. Thus, `update_lock_points(lp)` needs to be called right after `CheckSequenceLocks(lp)`, otherwise we lose the data in `lp`. I incorrectly assumed they could be called in separate loops.
The incorrect behavior introduced is: if we have a reorg in which a timelocked mempool transaction is still valid but becomes valid at a different block, the cached `LockPoints` will be incorrect.
This PR fixes the bug, adds a test, and adds an assertion at the end of `removeForReorg()` to check that all mempool entries' lockpoints are valid. You can reproduce the bug by running the test added in the [test] commit on the code before the [bugfix] commit.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK b4adc5ad6769e4a5a6179dfff271cd4c9dc47a5b
vasild:
ACK b4adc5ad6769e4a5a6179dfff271cd4c9dc47a5b
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK b4adc5ad6769e4a5a6179dfff271cd4c9dc47a5b
hebasto:
ACK b4adc5ad6769e4a5a6179dfff271cd4c9dc47a5b
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK b4adc5ad6769e4a5a6179dfff271cd4c9dc47a5b 🏁
Tree-SHA512: 16b59f6ff8140d0229079ca1c6b04f2f4a00a2e49931275150e4f3fe5ac4ec109698b083fa6b223ba9511f328271cc1ab081263669d5da020af7fee83c13e401
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Commits of previous years:
* 2020: fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
* 2019: aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
|
|
Often when we're updating mempool entries we update entries that we
ultimately end up removing the updated entries shortly thereafter. This
patch makes it so that we filter for such entries a bit earlier in
processing, which yields a mild improvement for these cases, and is
negligible overhead otherwise.
|
|
During a reorg, we re-check timelocks on all mempool entries using
CheckSequenceLocks(useExistingLockPoints=false) and remove any
now-invalid entries. CheckSequenceLocks() also mutates the LockPoints
passed in, and we update valid entries' LockPoints using
update_lock_points. Thus, update_lock_points(lp) needs to be called
right after CheckSequenceLocks(lp), otherwise we lose the data in lp.
commit bedf246 introduced a bug by separating those two loops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lockpoints are not changed in this function.
There is no reason to pass a pointer.
|
|
No behavior change.
Parameterize removeForReorg using a CChain and callable that
encapsulates validation logic. The mempool shouldn't need to know a
bunch of details about coinbase maturity and lock finality. Instead,
just pass in a callable function that says true/false. Breaks circular
dependency by removing txmempool's dependency on validation.
|
|
This is an extremely cheap function (just checks that the coin CTxOut
isn't null) that doesn't need to be gated on check_ratio.
|
