aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-11-30Merge #20499: Remove obsolete NODISCARD ifdef forest. Use [[nodiscard]] (C++17).MarcoFalke
79bff8e48aca961ec271b0d592aca9278b981e2f Remove NODISCARD (practicalswift) 4848e711076c6ebc5d841feb83baeb6d2bc76c94 scripted-diff: Use [[nodiscard]] (C++17) instead of NODISCARD (practicalswift) Pull request description: Remove obsolete `NODISCARD` `ifdef` forest. Use `[[nodiscard]]` (C++17). ACKs for top commit: theStack: ACK 79bff8e48aca961ec271b0d592aca9278b981e2f fanquake: ACK 79bff8e48aca961ec271b0d592aca9278b981e2f Tree-SHA512: 56dbb8e50ed97ecfbce28cdc688a01146108acae49a943e338a8f983f7168914710d36e38632f6a7c200ba6c6ac35b2519e97d6c985e8e7eb23223f13bf985d6
2020-11-30Merge #20491: refactor: Drop noop gcc version checksfanquake
830ddf413934226d0b6ca99165916790cc52ca18 Drop noop gcc version checks (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: Since #20413 the minimum required GCC version is 7. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 830ddf413934226d0b6ca99165916790cc52ca18 Tree-SHA512: 36264661d6ced1683a0c907efba7c700502acaf8e9fd50d9066bc9c7b877b25165b0684c2d7fe74bd58e500a77d7702bdbdd53691c274f29e4abccd241c10964
2020-11-26scripted-diff: Use [[nodiscard]] (C++17) instead of NODISCARDpracticalswift
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i "s/NODISCARD/[[nodiscard]]/g" $(git grep -l "NODISCARD" ":(exclude)src/bench/nanobench.h" ":(exclude)src/attributes.h") -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2020-11-25Merge #19337: sync: detect double lock from the same threadWladimir J. van der Laan
95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6 sync: detect double lock from the same thread (Vasil Dimov) 4df6567e4cbb4677e8048de2f8008612e1b860b9 sync: make EnterCritical() & push_lock() type safe (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: Double lock of the same (non-recursive) mutex from the same thread would produce an undefined behavior. Detect this from `DEBUG_LOCKORDER` and react similarly to the deadlock detection. This came up during discussion in another, related PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19238#discussion_r442394521. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: code review ACK 95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6 hebasto: re-ACK 95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6 Tree-SHA512: 375c62db7819e348bfaecc3bd82a7907fcd8f5af24f7d637ac82f3f16789da9fc127dbd0e37158a08e0dcbba01a55c6635caf1d8e9e827cf5a3747f7690a498e
2020-11-25Drop noop gcc version checksHennadii Stepanov
Since #20413 the minimum required GCC version is 7. Co-authored-by: practicalswift <practicalswift@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-11-24test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:spracticalswift
2020-11-23Merge #20432: net: Treat raw message bytes as uint8_tWladimir J. van der Laan
fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c net: Treat raw message bytes as uint8_t (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Using `uint8_t` from the beginning when messages are `recv`ed has two style benefits: * The signedness is clear from reading the code, as it does not depend on the architecture * When passing the bytes on, the need for static signedness casts is dropped, making the code a bit less verbose and more coherent ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c theStack: Code Review ACK fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c jonatack: Tested ACK fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c Tree-SHA512: e6d9803c78633fde3304faf592afa961ff9462a7912d1da97a24720265274aa10ab4168d71b6ec2756b7448dd42585321afee0e5c889e705be778ce9a330d145
2020-11-20Merge #20223: build: Drop the leading 0 from the version numberMarcoFalke
8f7b93047581c67f2133cdb8c7845471de66c30f Drop the leading 0 from the version number (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was accidentally not included in the version number. The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously, as the Major version was 0 so it never actually got included in it. The user agent string formatter is updated to follow this new versioning. *** Honestly I'm just tired of all of the people asking for "1.0" that maybe this'll shut them up. Skip the whole 1.0 thing and go straight to version 22.0! Also, this means that the terminology we commonly use lines up with how the variables are named. So major versions are actually bumping the major version number, etc. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: Code review ACK 8f7b930475 MarcoFalke: review ACK 8f7b93047581c67f2133cdb8c7845471de66c30f 🎻 Tree-SHA512: b5c3fae14d4c0a9c0ab3b1db7c949ecc0ac3537646306b13d98dd0efc17c489cdd16d43f0a24aaa28e9c4a92ea360500e05480a335b03f9fb308010cdd93a436
2020-11-20net: Treat raw message bytes as uint8_tMarcoFalke
2020-11-20Merge #20056: net: Use Span in ReceiveMsgBytesWladimir J. van der Laan
fa5ed3b4ca609426b2622cad235e107d33db7b30 net: Use Span in ReceiveMsgBytes (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Pass a data pointer and a size as span in `ReceiveMsgBytes` to get the benefits of a span ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK fa5ed3b4ca609426b2622cad235e107d33db7b30 code review, rebased to current master 12a1c3ad1a43634, debug build, unit tests, ran bitcoind/-netinfo/getpeerinfo theStack: ACK fa5ed3b4ca609426b2622cad235e107d33db7b30 Tree-SHA512: 89bf111323148d6e6e50185ad20ab39f73ab3a58a27e46319e3a08bcf5dcf9d6aa84faff0fd6afb90cb892ac2f557a237c144560986063bc736a69ace353ab9d
2020-11-20Merge #20000: test: fix creation of "std::string"s with \0sWladimir J. van der Laan
ecc6cf1a3b097b9b5b047282063a0b6779631b83 test: fix creation of std::string objects with \0s (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: A string literal `"abc"` contains a terminating `\0`, so that is 4 bytes. There is no need to write `"abc\0"` unless two terminating `\0`s are necessary. `std::string` objects do not internally contain a terminating `\0`, so `std::string("abc")` creates a string with size 3 and is the same as `std::string("abc", 3)`. In `"\01"` the `01` part is interpreted as one number (1) and that is the same as `"\1"` which is a string like `{1, 0}` whereas `"\0z"` is a string like `{0, 'z', 0}`. To create a string like `{0, '1', 0}` one must use `"\0" "1"`. Adjust the tests accordingly. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK ecc6cf1a3b097b9b5b047282063a0b6779631b83 practicalswift: ACK ecc6cf1a3b097b9b5b047282063a0b6779631b83 modulo happily green CI Tree-SHA512: 5eb489e8533a4199a9324b92f7280041552379731ebf7dfee169f70d5458e20e29b36f8bfaee6f201f48ab2b9d1d0fc4bdf8d6e4c58d6102f399cfbea54a219e
2020-11-18Drop the leading 0 from the version numberAndrew Chow
Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was accidentally not included in the version number. The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously, the Major version was 0 so that was never a factor in CLIENT_VERSION.
2020-11-17Merge #20305: wallet: introduce fee_rate sat/vB param/optionMarcoFalke
05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b wallet: override minfee checks (fOverrideFeeRate) for fee_rate (Jon Atack) 9a670b4f07a6140de809d73cbd7f3e614eb6ea74 wallet: update sendtoaddress, send RPC examples with fee_rate (Jon Atack) be481b72e24fb6834bd674cd8daee67c6938b42d wallet: use MIN_RELAY_TX_FEE in bumpfee help (Jon Atack) 449b730579566459e350703611629e63e54657ed wallet: provide valid values if invalid estimate mode passed (Jon Atack) 6da3afbaee5809ebf6d88efaa3958c505c2d71c7 wallet: update remaining rpcwallet fee rate units to BTC/kvB (Jon Atack) 173b5b5fe07d45be5a1e5bc7a5df996f20ab1e85 wallet: update fee rate units, use sat/vB for fee_rate error messages (Jon Atack) 7f9835a05abf3e168ad93e7195cbaa4bf61b9b07 wallet: remove fee rates from conf_target helps (Jon Atack) b7994c01e9a3251536fe6538a22f614774eec82d wallet: add fee_rate unit warnings to bumpfee (Jon Atack) 410e471fa42d3db04e8879c71f8c824dcc151a83 wallet: remove redundant bumpfee fee_rate checks (Jon Atack) a0d495747320c79b27a83c216dcc526ac8df8f24 wallet: introduce fee_rate (sat/vB) param/option (Jon Atack) e21212f01b7c41eba13b0479b252053cf482bc1f wallet: remove unneeded WALLET_BTC_KB_TO_SAT_B constant (Jon Atack) 6112cf20d43b0be34fe0edce2ac3e6b27cae1bbe wallet: add CFeeRate ctor doxygen documentation (Jon Atack) 3f7279161347543ce4e997d78ea89a4043491145 wallet: fix bug in RPC send options (Jon Atack) Pull request description: This PR builds on #11413 and #20220 to address #19543. - replace overloading the conf_target and estimate_mode params with `fee_rate` in sat/vB in the sendtoaddress, sendmany, send, fundrawtransaction, walletcreatefundedpsbt, and bumpfee RPCs - allow non-actionable conf_target value of `0` and estimate_mode value of `""` to be passed to use `fee_rate` as a positional argument, in addition to as a named argument - fix a bug in the experimental send RPC described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20220#discussion_r513789526 where args were not being passed correctly into the options values - update the feerate error message units for these RPCs from BTC/kB to sat/vB - update the test coverage, help docs, doxygen docs, and some of the RPC examples - other changes to address the excellent review feedback See this wallet meeting log for more context: http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-11-06.html#l-309 ACKs for top commit: achow101: re-ACK 05e82d8 MarcoFalke: review ACK 05e82d86b0 did not test and found a few style nits, which can be fixed later 🍯 Xekyo: tACK 05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b Sjors: utACK 05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b Tree-SHA512: a4ee5f184ada53f1840b2923d25873bda88c5a2ae48e67eeea2417a0b35154798cfdb3c147b05dd56bd6608a784e1b91623bb985ee2ab9ef2baaec22206d0a9c
2020-11-16Merge #20033: refactor: minor whitespace fixups, s/const/constexpr/ and ↵MarcoFalke
remove template (followup to #19845) 89836a82eec63f93bbe6c3bd6a52be26e71ab54d style: minor improvements as a followup to #19845 (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: Address suggestions: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19845#discussion_r495486760 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19845#discussion_r495488051 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19845#discussion_r495730125 ACKs for top commit: jonatack: re-ACK 89836a8 change since previous review is replacing std::runtime_error with std::exception, built/ran unit tests with gcc debian 10.2.0-15, then broke a few v3 net_tests involving `BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION`, rebuilt, ran `src/test/test_bitcoin -t net_tests -l all` and checked the error reporting. hebasto: re-ACK 89836a82eec63f93bbe6c3bd6a52be26e71ab54d theStack: ACK 89836a82eec63f93bbe6c3bd6a52be26e71ab54d Tree-SHA512: 36477fdccabe5a8ad91fbabb4655cc363a3a7ca237a98ae6dd4a9fae4a4113762040f864d4ca13a47d081f7d16e5bd487edbfb61ab50a37e4a0424e9bec30b24
2020-11-12fuzz: Use ConsumeRandomLengthBitVector(...) in src/test/fuzz/connman and ↵practicalswift
src/test/fuzz/net
2020-11-12tests: Add fuzzing harness for CAddrManpracticalswift
2020-11-12wallet: update fee rate units, use sat/vB for fee_rate error messagesJon Atack
and BTC/kvB for feeRate error messages.
2020-11-12Merge #20188: tests: Add fuzzing harness for CConnmanMarcoFalke
79ef8324d4c85ed16a304e98805724b8a59022ac tests: Add fuzzing harness for CConnman (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add fuzzing harness for `CConnman`. See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets). Happy fuzzing :) ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 79ef8324d4c85ed16a304e98805724b8a59022ac Tree-SHA512: eb9ffae20e939b818f8b9def064544b9a8fcd127ca22d1a54af1afedf1d24143be42419f3a03d684be59a5ff07b29d8bfa34ef2aaf1d9f9f75c4c1aaa90a29a8
2020-11-11fuzz: Improve coverage for CPartialMerkleTree fuzzing harnesspracticalswift
2020-11-10Merge #20332: test: Mock IBD in net_processing fuzzersMarcoFalke
fa4234d877ea3193bfd0e18ff68dcb8fb84b47b5 test: Mock IBD in net_processing fuzzers (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Without this the fuzzers fail to detect trivial crasher bugs, such as https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20317#issuecomment-723047111 ACKs for top commit: practicalswift: Tested ACK fa4234d877ea3193bfd0e18ff68dcb8fb84b47b5 Tree-SHA512: ce5da5c0a604b7559805a98ffdde882b44ca4f91b003b493d6e1be230714ce4cccb11dbfc1fc175f9d8fc779551c0a4103ceb4b473552928207d7d78ae329e10
2020-11-09fuzz: Assert roundtrip equality for both addrv1 and addrv2 versions of CServicepracticalswift
2020-11-09fuzz: Check for addrv1 compatibility before using addrv1 ↵practicalswift
serializer/deserializer on CSubNet
2020-11-07test: Mock IBD in net_processing fuzzersMarcoFalke
2020-11-05Merge #20303: fuzz: Assert expected DecodeHexTx behaviour when using legacy ↵MarcoFalke
decoding d7901ab8d2fdd2f6e68c4fa48078111bf5f0fa73 fuzz: Assert expected DecodeHexTx behaviour when using legacy decoding (practicalswift) Pull request description: Assert expected `DecodeHexTx` behaviour when using legacy decoding. As suggested by MarcoFalke in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20290#issuecomment-720989597. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK d7901ab8d2fdd2f6e68c4fa48078111bf5f0fa73 Tree-SHA512: 3285680059e6fa73b0fb2c52b775f6319de1ac616f731206662b742764dc888cdfd1ac1f1fcfdfd5418d2006475a852d1c1a56a7035f772f0a6b2a84f5de93bc
2020-11-04fuzz: Assert expected DecodeHexTx behaviour when using legacy decodingpracticalswift
2020-11-04Merge #20300: fuzz: Add missing ECC_Start to descriptor_parse testMarcoFalke
5cafe2b25c1d2f6825b3c8103c280020929dd645 fuzz: Add missing ECC_Start to descriptor_parse test (Ivan Metlushko) Pull request description: Fixes fuzzing harness. I also observed that the corpus for this test consists only of `xprv...` keys while we are using regtest parameters. So for proper fuzzing we need either A) to update the corpus and replace `xprv...` with `tprv...` B) switch to main net in the test ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 5cafe2b25c1d2f6825b3c8103c280020929dd645 practicalswift: Tested ACK 5cafe2b25c1d2f6825b3c8103c280020929dd645 Tree-SHA512: 7415a98a445ce0f96219637d2362fecfc1191ad104f55d79ca92b0c92cde165e00646be5bf3fda956385e3cb22540eca457e575048493367cdf0e00a27d7cdb8
2020-11-04fuzz: Add missing ECC_Start to descriptor_parse testIvan Metlushko
2020-11-04Merge #20245: test: Run script_assets_test even if built --with-libs=noMarcoFalke
fa3967efdb07f1d22372f4ee2e602ea1fad04a57 test: Replace ARRAYLEN with C++11 ranged for loop (MarcoFalke) fafc5290538fde76c3780976f4b2c11dc9f24d19 test: Run AssetTest even if built --with-libs=no (MarcoFalke) faf58ab139949ca35b33217d010b350c9a59c61d ci: Add --with-libs=no to one ci config (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: `script_assets_test` doesn't call libbitcoinconsensus, so it seems confusing to require it ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK fa3967efdb07f1d22372f4ee2e602ea1fad04a57 - looks ok to me. Tree-SHA512: 8744fef64c5d7dc19a0ef4ae9b3df5b3f356253bf000f12723064794c5e50df071824d436059985f1112d94c1b530b65cbeb6b8435114a91b195480620eafc59
2020-11-03Merge #20290: fuzz: Fix DecodeHexTx fuzzing harness issueMarcoFalke
28f8cb13d4d5a3d6aefa6e192e55f9aa87579e52 fuzz: Fix DecodeHexTx fuzzing harness issue (practicalswift) Pull request description: Fix `DecodeHexTx` fuzzing harness issue. Before this patch: ``` $ src/test/fuzz/decode_tx decode_tx: test/fuzz/decode_tx.cpp:29: void test_one_input(const std::vector<uint8_t> &): Assertion `result_try_witness_and_maybe_no_witness' failed. … ``` After this patch: ``` $ src/test/fuzz/decode_tx … ``` ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 28f8cb13d4d5a3d6aefa6e192e55f9aa87579e52 Tree-SHA512: 2ed11b2f00a4c6fa3e8eea76a2a37d89a4b8d52815264676fe3de0a26ad7906cfafda9b843ceede2fd428815472e01fd1f87afb851282a8c7839bd4c87dc382b
2020-11-03Merge #20289: fuzz: Check for addrv1 compatibility before using addrv1 ↵MarcoFalke
serializer/deserializer on CService c2cf8a18c25bf19ade51fedfa5c352bd7145edb0 fuzz: Check for addrv1 compatibility before using addrv1 serializer on CService (practicalswift) Pull request description: Check for addrv1 compatibility before using addrv1 serializer/deserializer on `CService`: Before this patch: ``` $ src/test/fuzz/service_deserialize service_deserialize: test/fuzz/deserialize.cpp:85: void (anonymous namespace)::AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(const T &, const int) [T = CService]: Assertion `Deserialize<T>(Serialize(obj, version)) == obj' failed. ``` After this patch: ``` $ src/test/fuzz/service_deserialize … ``` Related change: #20247 ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK c2cf8a18c25bf19ade51fedfa5c352bd7145edb0 Tree-SHA512: dba6ddc60e8ef621011d844281461f1741de08c4af1a2b7156c810af44306cef7ec582de5974752db02ca085cfd23da0296d70b694e59ee262589d829fa0626e
2020-11-03Merge #20187: Addrman: test-before-evict bugfix and improvements for ↵fanquake
block-relay-only peers 16d9bfc4172b4f6ce24a3cd1a1cfa3933cd26751 Avoid test-before-evict evictions of current peers (Suhas Daftuar) e8b215a086d91a8774210bb6ce8d1560aaaf0789 Refactor test for existing peer connection into own function (Suhas Daftuar) 4fe338ab3ed73b3ffb20eedf95500c56ec2920e1 Call CAddrMan::Good() on block-relay-only peer addresses (Suhas Daftuar) daf55531260833d597ee599e2d289ea1be0b1d9c Avoid calling CAddrMan::Connected() on block-relay-only peer addresses (Suhas Daftuar) Pull request description: This PR does two things: * Block-relay-only interaction with addrman. * Calling `CAddrMan::Connected()` on an address that was a block-relay-only peer causes the time we report in `addr` messages containing that peer to be updated; particularly now that we use anchor connections with a our block-relay-only peers, this risks leaking information about those peers. So, stop this. * Avoiding calling `CAddrMan::Good()` on block-relay-only peer addresses causes the addrman logic around maintaining the new and tried table to be less good, and in particular makes it so that block-relay-only peer addresses are more likely to be evicted from the addrman (for no good reason I can think of). So, mark those addresses as good when we connect. * Fix test-before-evict bug. There's a bug where if we get a collision in the tried table with an existing address that is one of our current peers, and the connection is long-lived enough, then `SelectTriedCollisions()` might return that existing peer address to us as a test-before-evict connection candidate. However, our logic for new outbound connections would later prevent us from actually making a connection; the result would be that when we get a collision with a long-lived current peer, that peer's address is likely to get evicted from the tried table. Fix this by checking to see if a test-before-evict candidate is a peer we're currently connected to, and if so, mark it as `Good()`. ACKs for top commit: sipa: utACK 16d9bfc4172b4f6ce24a3cd1a1cfa3933cd26751 amitiuttarwar: code review ACK 16d9bfc417 mzumsande: Code-Review ACK 16d9bfc4172b4f6ce24a3cd1a1cfa3933cd26751. jnewbery: utACK 16d9bfc4172b4f6ce24a3cd1a1cfa3933cd26751 ariard: Code Review ACK 16d9bfc. jonatack: Tested ACK 16d9bfc4172b4f6ce24a3cd1a1cfa3933cd26751 Tree-SHA512: 188ccb814e436937cbb91d29d73c316ce83f4b9c22f1cda56747f0949a093e10161ae724e87e4a2d85ac40f85f5f6b4e87e97d350a1ac44f80c57783f4423324
2020-11-02fuzz: Fix DecodeHexTx fuzzing harness issuepracticalswift
2020-11-02fuzz: Check for addrv1 compatibility before using addrv1 serializer on CServicepracticalswift
2020-11-02Merge #20165: Only relay Taproot spends if next block has it activeMarcoFalke
3d0556d41087f945ed0a47a5d770076ad42ce432 Increase feature_taproot inactive test coverage (Pieter Wuille) 525cbd425e2f6a1dbd0febc53d7ada22cec4661f Only relay Taproot spends if next block has it active (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: There should be no change to mempool transaction behavior for witness v1 transactions as long as no activation is defined. Until that point, we should treat the consensus rules as under debate, and for soft-fork safety, that means spends should be treated as non-standard. It's possible to go further: don't relay them unless the consensus rules are actually active for the next block. This extends non-relay to the period where a deployment is defined, started, locked in, or failed. I see no downsides to this, and the code change is very simple. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: utACK 3d0556d41087f945ed0a47a5d770076ad42ce432 MarcoFalke: review ACK 3d0556d41087f945ed0a47a5d770076ad42ce432 🏓 jnewbery: utACK 3d0556d41087f945ed0a47a5d770076ad42ce432 Tree-SHA512: ca625a2981716b4b44e8f3722718fd25fd04e25bf3ca1684924b8974fca49f7c1d438fdd9dcdfbc091a442002e20d441d42c41a0e2096e74a61068da6c60267a
2020-11-02Merge #20080: Strip any trailing `/` in -datadir and -blocksdir pathsSamuel Dobson
ad5cef5dfdd5802fc187a52e74d940a52f420a51 doc: Update data directory path comments (Hennadii Stepanov) b19e88230f0e93e95e883e65376963cb9c36f606 util: Add StripRedundantLastElementsOfPath function (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: Wallet names in `listwalletdir` RPC are correct now, even if the `-datadir` path has any number of trailing `/`. This PR is an alternative to #19933. Fixes #19928. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK ad5cef5dfd 🔙 promag: Code review ACK ad5cef5dfdd5802fc187a52e74d940a52f420a51. meshcollider: Code review + test run ACK ad5cef5dfdd5802fc187a52e74d940a52f420a51 Tree-SHA512: bccabbd6c18243d48d15b2b27201cc0f5984623dcbc635c8740cf74523f359844c36eadd40391142874fcf452a43880bb6afbf89815ae736e499f9a98143a661
2020-10-31style: minor improvements as a followup to #19845Vasil Dimov
Address suggestions: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19845#discussion_r495486760 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19845#discussion_r495488051 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19845#discussion_r495730125
2020-10-31test: fix creation of std::string objects with \0sVasil Dimov
A string literal `"abc"` contains a terminating `\0`, so that is 4 bytes. There is no need to write `"abc\0"` unless two terminating `\0`s are necessary. `std::string` objects do not internally contain a terminating `\0`, so `std::string("abc")` creates a string with size 3 and is the same as `std::string("abc", 3)`. In `"\01"` the `01` part is interpreted as one number (1) and that is the same as `"\1"` which is a string like `{1, 0}` whereas `"\0z"` is a string like `{0, 'z', 0}`. To create a string like `{0, '1', 0}` one must use `"\0" "1"`. Adjust the tests accordingly.
2020-10-30Only relay Taproot spends if next block has it activePieter Wuille
2020-10-29Merge #20242: fuzz: Properly initialize PrecomputedTransactionDataWladimir J. van der Laan
fa56d56d4e9b69fdd02e631b9a2380cfd3095144 fuzz: Properly initialize PrecomputedTransactionData (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Fixes: ``` script_flags: script/interpreter.cpp:1512: bool SignatureHashSchnorr(uint256 &, const ScriptExecutionData &, const T &, uint32_t, uint8_t, SigVersion, const PrecomputedTransactionData &) [T = CTransaction]: Assertion `cache.m_bip341_taproot_ready && cache.m_spent_outputs_ready' failed. ==34989== ERROR: libFuzzer: deadly signal #0 0x55e90077ff11 in __sanitizer_print_stack_trace (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x20cf11) #1 0x55e9006cb068 in fuzzer::PrintStackTrace() (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x158068) #2 0x55e9006b01b3 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::CrashCallback() (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x13d1b3) #3 0x7f6fb89383bf (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x153bf) #4 0x7f6fb855018a in raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x4618a) #5 0x7f6fb852f858 in abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x25858) #6 0x7f6fb852f728 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x25728) #7 0x7f6fb8540f35 in __assert_fail (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x36f35) #8 0x55e9008275bd in bool SignatureHashSchnorr<CTransaction>(uint256&, ScriptExecutionData const&, CTransaction const&, unsigned int, unsigned char, SigVersion, PrecomputedTransactionData const&) /tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/script/interpreter.cpp:1512:5 #9 0x55e900825a3f in GenericTransactionSignatureChecker<CTransaction>::CheckSchnorrSignature(Span<unsigned char const>, Span<unsigned char const>, SigVersion, ScriptExecutionData const&, ScriptError_t*) const /tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/script/interpreter.cpp:1699:10 #10 0x55e900832503 in VerifyWitnessProgram(CScriptWitness const&, int, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&, unsigned int, BaseSignatureChecker const&, ScriptError_t*, bool) /tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/script/interpreter.cpp:1900:26 #11 0x55e90082ecb5 in VerifyScript(CScript const&, CScript const&, CScriptWitness const*, unsigned int, BaseSignatureChecker const&, ScriptError_t*) /tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/script/interpreter.cpp:1977:18 #12 0x55e9007a9b61 in test_one_input(std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&) /tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags.cpp:51:30 #13 0x55e9007d0b49 in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/fuzz.cpp:36:5 #14 0x55e9006b1871 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ExecuteCallback(unsigned char const*, unsigned long) (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x13e871) #15 0x55e9006b0fb5 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::RunOne(unsigned char const*, unsigned long, bool, fuzzer::InputInfo*, bool*) (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x13dfb5) #16 0x55e9006b38d7 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ReadAndExecuteSeedCorpora(std::__Fuzzer::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, fuzzer::fuzzer_allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile> >&) (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x1408d7) #17 0x55e9006b3c39 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::Loop(std::__Fuzzer::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, fuzzer::fuzzer_allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile> >&) (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x140c39) #18 0x55e9006a290e in fuzzer::FuzzerDriver(int*, char***, int (*)(unsigned char const*, unsigned long)) (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x12f90e) #19 0x55e9006cb752 in main (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x158752) #20 0x7f6fb85310b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x270b2) #21 0x55e9006776ad in _start (/tmp/bitcoin-core/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/script_flags+0x1046ad) ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK fa56d56d4e9b69fdd02e631b9a2380cfd3095144 Tree-SHA512: 5637b0a0d982360df32d8cd39e913395967af02ec746508fc5f2fd649695c58bfaaf18ef76f4ca9da764d34fdd63dfe188317dd41b2ed57534bd4055a05ae870
2020-10-27util: Add StripRedundantLastElementsOfPath functionHennadii Stepanov
Co-authored-by: saibato <saibato.naga@pm.me> Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
2020-10-27Avoid calling CAddrMan::Connected() on block-relay-only peer addressesSuhas Daftuar
Connected() updates the time we serve in addr messages, so avoid leaking block-relay-only peer connections by avoiding these calls.
2020-10-26fuzz: Check for addrv1 compatibility before using addrv1 serializerpracticalswift
2020-10-26test: Replace ARRAYLEN with C++11 ranged for loopMarcoFalke
2020-10-26test: Run AssetTest even if built --with-libs=noMarcoFalke
2020-10-26fuzz: Properly initialize PrecomputedTransactionDataMarcoFalke
2020-10-20tests: Add fuzzing harness for CConnmanpracticalswift
2020-10-18test: Fix -Wunused-function warning if configured --without-libsHennadii Stepanov
This is a move-only change.
2020-10-15Merge #20131: test: Remove unused nVersion=1 in p2p testsWladimir J. van der Laan
faad92fe1c3cca9795226bd167130976930ddab8 test: Remove unused nVersion=1 in p2p tests (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: After commit ddefb5c0b759950942ac03f28c43b548af7b4033 nVersion is no longer used in p2p logic when sending messages. Only when receiving messages, but in this test no messages are received. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK faad92fe1c3cca9795226bd167130976930ddab8 fanquake: ACK faad92fe1c3cca9795226bd167130976930ddab8 Tree-SHA512: 9a7029187aaa5a7929a4a2199646131ff1ea72df6a855ce7022dd3bb2647dd525356dbc5e460c77007eebcdeab400a689db8cb77e8239af3b539c117a4e0d16e
2020-10-15Merge #19953: Implement BIP 340-342 validation (Schnorr/taproot/tapscript)Wladimir J. van der Laan
0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6 tests: dumping and minimizing of script assets data (Pieter Wuille) 4567ba034c5ae6e6cc161360f7425c9e844738f0 tests: add generic qa-asset-based script verification unit test (Pieter Wuille) f06e6d03452cf5e0b1a0863afb08c9e6d3ef452e tests: functional tests for Schnorr/Taproot/Tapscript (Pieter Wuille) 3c226639eb134314a0640d34e4ccb6148dbde22f tests: add BIP340 Schnorr signature support to test framework (Pieter Wuille) 206fb180ec6ee5f916afc6f574000d716daf79b7 --- [TAPROOT] Tests --- (Pieter Wuille) d7ff237f2996a4c11fdf9399187c2d2b26bf9809 Activate Taproot/Tapscript on regtest (BIP 341, BIP 342) (Pieter Wuille) e9a021d7e6a454d610a45cb9b3995f0d96a5fbb6 Make Taproot spends standard + policy limits (Pieter Wuille) 865d2c37e2e44678498b7f425b65e01b1e231cde --- [TAPROOT] Regtest activation and policy --- (Pieter Wuille) 72422ce396b8eba7b1a72c171c2f07dae691d1b5 Implement Tapscript script validation rules (BIP 342) (Johnson Lau) 330de894a9a48515d9a473448b6c67adc3d188be Use ScriptExecutionData to pass through annex hash (Pieter Wuille) 8bbed4b7acf4c76eaea8c0e10f3cbf6ba4e53809 Implement Taproot validation (BIP 341) (Pieter Wuille) 0664f5fe1f77f08d235aa3750b59428257b0b91d Support for Schnorr signatures and integration in SignatureCheckers (BIP 340) (Pieter Wuille) 5de246ca8159dcffaa4c136a60c8bfed2028e2ee Implement Taproot signature hashing (BIP 341) (Johnson Lau) 9eb590894f15ff40806039bfd32972fbc260e30d Add TaggedHash function (BIP 340) (Pieter Wuille) 450d2b23710ad296eede81339195376021ab5500 --- [TAPROOT] BIP340/341/342 consensus rules --- (Pieter Wuille) 5d62e3a68b6ea9bb03556ee1fbf5678f20be01a2 refactor: keep spent outputs in PrecomputedTransactionData (Pieter Wuille) 8bd2b4e78452ff69c08c37acf164a6b80e503f13 refactor: rename scriptPubKey in VerifyWitnessProgram to exec_script (Pieter Wuille) 107b57df9fa8b2d625d2b342dc77722282a6ae4c scripted-diff: put ECDSA in name of signature functions (Pieter Wuille) f8c099e2207c90d758e7a659d6a55fa7ccb7ceaa --- [TAPROOT] Refactors --- (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: This is an implementation of the Schnorr/taproot consensus rules proposed by BIPs [340](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki), [341](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki), and [342](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki). See the list of commits [below](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953#issuecomment-691815830). No signing or wallet support of any kind is included, as testing is done entirely through the Python test framework. This is a successor to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17977 (see discussion following [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17977#issuecomment-682285983)), and will have further changes squashed/rebased. The history of this PR can be found in #19997. ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953/commits/0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6 benthecarman: reACK 0e2a5e4 kallewoof: reACK 0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6 jonasnick: ACK 0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6 almost only looked at bip340/libsecp related code jonatack: ACK 0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6 modulo the last four commits (tests) that I plan to finish reviewing tomorrow fjahr: reACK 0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6 achow101: ACK 0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6 Tree-SHA512: 1b00314450a2938a22bccbb4e177230cf08bd365d72055f9d526891f334b364c997e260c10bc19ca78440b6767712c9feea7faad9a1045dd51a5b96f7ca8146e
2020-10-14Merge #19988: Overhaul transaction request logicWladimir J. van der Laan
fd9a0060f028a4c01bd88f58777dea34bdcbafd1 Report and verify expirations (Pieter Wuille) 86f50ed10f66b5535f0162cf0026456a9e3f8963 Delete limitedmap as it is unused now (Pieter Wuille) cc16fff3e476a9378d2176b3c1b83ad12b1b052a Make txid delay penalty also apply to fetches of orphan's parents (Pieter Wuille) 173a1d2d3f824b83777ac713e89bee69fd87692d Expedite removal of tx requests that are no longer needed (Pieter Wuille) de11b0a4eff20da3e3ca52dc90948b5253d329c5 Reduce MAX_PEER_TX_ANNOUNCEMENTS for non-PF_RELAY peers (Pieter Wuille) 242d16477df1a024c7126bad23dde39cad217eca Change transaction request logic to use txrequest (Pieter Wuille) 5b03121d60527a193a84c339151481f9c9c1962b Add txrequest fuzz tests (Pieter Wuille) 3c7fe0e5a0ee1abf4dc263ae5310e68253c866e1 Add txrequest unit tests (Pieter Wuille) da3b8fde03f2e8060bb7ff3bff17175dab85f0cd Add txrequest module (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: This replaces the transaction request logic with an encapsulated class that maintains all the state surrounding it. By keeping it stand alone, it can be easily tested (using included unit tests and fuzz tests). The major changes are: * Announcements from outbound (and whitelisted) peers are now always preferred over those from inbound peers. This used to be the case for the first request (by delaying the first request from inbound peers), and a bias afters. The 2s delay for requests from inbound peers still exists, but after that, if viable outbound peers remain for any given transaction, they will always be tried first. * No more hard cap of 100 in flight transactions per peer, as there is less need for it (memory usage is linear in the number of announcements, but independent from the number in flight, and CPU usage isn't affected by it). Furthermore, if only one peer announces a transaction, and it has over 100 in flight already, we still want to request it from them. The cap is replaced with a rule that announcements from such overloaded peers get an additional 2s delay (possibly combined with the existing 2s delays for inbound connections, and for txid peers when wtxid peers are available). * The limit of 100000 tracked announcements is reduced to 5000; this was excessive. This can be bypassed using the PF_RELAY permission (to accommodate locally dumping a batch of many transactions). This replaces #19184, rebased on #18044 and with many small changes. ACKs for top commit: ariard: Code Review ACK fd9a006. I've reviewed the new TxRequestTracker, its integration in net_processing, unit/functional/fuzzing test coverage. I looked more for soundness of new specification rather than functional consistency with old transaction request logic. MarcoFalke: Approach ACK fd9a0060f028a4c01bd88f58777dea34bdcbafd1 🏹 naumenkogs: Code Review ACK fd9a006. I've reviewed everything, mostly to see how this stuff works at the lower level (less documentation-wise, more implementation-wise), and to try breaking it with unexpected sequences of events. jnewbery: utACK fd9a0060f028a4c01bd88f58777dea34bdcbafd1 jonatack: WIP light ACK fd9a0060f028a4c01bd88f58777dea34bdcbafd1 have read the code, verified that each commit is hygienic, e.g. debug build clean and tests green, and have been running a node on and off with this branch and grepping the net debug log. Am still unpacking the discussion hidden by GitHub by fetching it via the API and connecting the dots, storing notes and suggestions in a local branch; at this point none are blockers. ryanofsky: Light code review ACK fd9a0060f028a4c01bd88f58777dea34bdcbafd1, looking at txrequest implementation, unit test implementation, and net_processing integration, just trying to understand how it works and looking for anything potentially confusing in the implementation. Didn't look at functional tests or catch up on review discussion. Just a sanity check review focused on: Tree-SHA512: ea7b52710371498b59d9c9cfb5230dd544fe9c6cb699e69178dea641646104f38a0b5ec7f5f0dbf1eb579b7ec25a31ea420593eff3b7556433daf92d4b0f0dd7
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-09-20 12:35:07 +0000