| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
0a22a52 Use mempool's ancestor sort in transaction selection (Suhas Daftuar)
7abfa53 Add test for new ancestor feerate sort behavior (Suhas Daftuar)
9a51319 Sort mempool by min(feerate, ancestor_feerate) (Suhas Daftuar)
6773f92 Refactor CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This more closely approximates the desirability of a given transaction for
mining, and should result in less re-sorting when transactions get removed from
the mempool after being mined.
I measured this as approximately a 5% speedup in removeForBlock.
Tree-SHA512: ffa36b567c5dfe3e8908c545a459b6a5ec0de26e7dc81b1050dd235cac9046564b4409a3f8c5ba97bd8b30526e8fec8f78480a912e317979467f32305c3dd37b
|
|
8e617e3 Remove unused mempool index (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
We haven't used the "mining_score" index since 0.12, so remove it.
Tree-SHA512: ae37b8663194986eaeecfc2bbeca7ecb4ae6f0d8384515fa218cbc939a580d4b9f7f997c5297c3f1b3c3a0651edb092f373ac9a4808aaec30d38cb99d5f3ed70
|
|
|
|
tx_valid.json
18be3ab139 Adding test case for SINGLE|ANYONECANPAY hash type in tx_valid.json (Chris Stewart)
Pull request description:
We are missing a test vector for SINGLE|ANYONECANPAY inside of tx_valid.json. This addresses the issue #12060
Tree-SHA512: e3526113477dbf575c4a844cf489dcfa2c037c6d928af6f97413edc1a8d29cdf2143da96471cdfd3de08bf5ed178117ed67926fd70fd42ca391ac0bb0d08f3fd
|
|
b224a47a1 Add address_types test (Pieter Wuille)
7ee54fd7c Support downgrading after recovered keypool witness keys (Pieter Wuille)
940a21932 SegWit wallet support (Pieter Wuille)
f37c64e47 Implicitly know about P2WPKH redeemscripts (Pieter Wuille)
57273f2b3 [test] Serialize CTransaction with witness by default (Pieter Wuille)
cf2c0b6f5 Support P2WPKH and P2SH-P2WPKH in dumpprivkey (Pieter Wuille)
37c03d3e0 Support P2WPKH addresses in create/addmultisig (Pieter Wuille)
3eaa003c8 Extend validateaddress information for P2SH-embedded witness (Pieter Wuille)
30a27dc5b Expose method to find key for a single-key destination (Pieter Wuille)
985c79552 Improve witness destination types and use them more (Pieter Wuille)
cbe197470 [refactor] GetAccount{PubKey,Address} -> GetAccountDestination (Pieter Wuille)
0c8ea6380 Abstract out IsSolvable from Witnessifier (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This implements a minimum viable implementation of SegWit wallet support, based on top of #11389, and includes part of the functionality from #11089.
Two new configuration options are added:
* `-addresstype`, with options `legacy`, `p2sh`, and `bech32`. It controls what kind of addresses are produced by `getnewaddress`, `getaccountaddress`, and `createmultisigaddress`.
* `-changetype`, with the same options, and by default equal to `-addresstype`, that controls what kind of change is used.
All wallet private and public keys can be used for any type of address. Support for address types dependent on different derivation paths will need a major overhaul of how our internal detection of outputs work. I expect that that will happen for a next major version.
The above also applies to imported keys, as having a distinction there but not for normal operations is a disaster for testing, and probably for comprehension of users. This has some ugly effects, like needing to associate the provided label to `importprivkey` with each style address for the corresponding key.
To deal with witness outputs requiring a corresponding redeemscript in wallet, three approaches are used:
* All SegWit addresses created through `getnewaddress` or multisig RPCs explicitly get their redeemscripts added to the wallet file. This means that downgrading after creating a witness address will work, as long as the wallet file is up to date.
* All SegWit keys in the wallet get an _implicit_ redeemscript added, without it being written to the file. This means recovery of an old backup will work, as long as you use new software.
* All keypool keys that are seen used in transactions explicitly get their redeemscripts added to the wallet files. This means that downgrading after recovering from a backup that includes a witness address will work.
These approaches correspond to solutions 3a, 1a, and 5a respectively from https://gist.github.com/sipa/125cfa1615946d0c3f3eec2ad7f250a2. As argued there, there is no full solution for dealing with the case where you both downgrade and restore a backup, so that's also not implemented.
`dumpwallet`, `importwallet`, `importmulti`, `signmessage` and `verifymessage` don't work with SegWit addresses yet. They're remaining TODOs, for this PR or a follow-up. Because of that, several tests unexpectedly run with `-addresstype=legacy` for now.
Tree-SHA512: d425dbe517c0422061ab8dacdc3a6ae47da071450932ed992c79559d922dff7b2574a31a8c94feccd3761c1dffb6422c50055e6dca8e3cf94a169bc95e39e959
|
|
Make CKeyStore automatically known about the redeemscripts necessary for P2SH-P2WPKH
(and due to the extra checks in IsMine, also P2WPKH) spending.
|
|
|
|
c99a3c32c8 [tests] util_tests.cpp: actually check ignored args (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
An array with 7 elements was setup for checking argument parsing, but
was passed to ParseParamaeters with argc=5, meaning the interpretation
of the last two arguments was never actually checked.
Tree-SHA512: 7b81fde49742e524f1bb67e2ec084f5909ae36125f237f0210df4587c62e5a5a8f277f13543f0a85ad145c4bb80d62339a7d50d7ed41659df318c8198ea7f428
|
|
|
|
An array with 7 elements was setup for checking argument parsing, but
was passed to ParseParamaeters with argc=5, meaning the interpretation
of the last two arguments was never actually checked.
|
|
|
|
97d2b09c12 Add helper to wait for validation interface queue to catch up (Matt Corallo)
36137497f1 Block ActivateBestChain to empty validationinterface queue (Matt Corallo)
5a933cefcc Add an interface to get the queue depth out of CValidationInterface (Matt Corallo)
a99b76f269 Require no cs_main lock for ProcessNewBlock/ActivateBestChain (Matt Corallo)
a734896038 Avoid cs_main in net_processing ActivateBestChain calls (Matt Corallo)
66aa1d58a1 Refactor ProcessGetData in anticipation of avoiding cs_main for ABC (Matt Corallo)
818075adac Create new mutex for orphans, no cs_main in PLV::BlockConnected (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This should fix #11822.
It ended up bigger than I hoped for, but its not too gnarly. Note that "
Require no cs_main lock for ProcessNewBlock/ActivateBestChain" is mostly pure code-movement.
Tree-SHA512: 1127688545926f6099449dca6a4e6609eefc3abbd72f1c66e03d32bd8c7b31e82097d8307822cfd1dec0321703579cfdd82069cab6e17b1024e75eac694122cb
|
|
|
|
This requires the removal of some very liberal (incorrect) cs_mains
sprinkled in some tests. It adds some chainActive.Tip() races, but
the tests are all single-threaded anyway.
|
|
3e1ee31 [Tests] Adding unit tests for GetDifficulty in blockchain.cpp. (sean)
Pull request description:
blockchain.cpp has low unit test coverage. This commit is intended
to start improving its code coverage to reasonable levels. One or more
follow up commits will complete the task that this commit is starting
(though the usefulness of this commit is not dependent upon later
commits).
Note that these tests were not written based upon a specification of how
GetDifficulty *should* work, but rather how it actually *does* work. As
a result, if there are any bugs in the current GetDifficulty
implementation, these unit tests serve to lock them in rather than
expose them.
-- Why has blockchain.cpp been modified if this is a unit testing change?
Since the existing GetDifficulty function relies on a global variable,
chainActive, it was not suitable for unit testing purposes. Both the
existing GetDifficulty function and the unit tests now call through to
a new, more modular version of GetDifficulty that can work on any chain,
not just chainActive.
-- Why does blockchain_tests.cpp directly include blockchain.cpp instead
of blockchain.h?
While the new GetDifficulty function's signature is arguably better than
the old one's, it still isn't great, and doesn't seem to warrant inclusion
as part of the blockchain.h API, especially since only test code is
directly using it. If a better way of exposing the new GetDifficulty
function to unit tests exists, please mention it and the commit will be
updated accordingly.
-- Why is the test fixture named blockchain_difficulty_tests rather than
blockchain_tests?
The Bitcoin Core policy for naming unit test files is to match the the
file under test ("blockchain" becomes "blockchain_tests"). While this
commit complies with that, blockchain.cpp is a massive file, such that
having all of the unit tests in one file will tend towards disorder.
Since there will be a lot more tests added to this file, the intention
is to divide up different types of tests into different test fixtures
within the same file.
Tree-SHA512: a7dda9c2a9414d4819b4d2911f5637891dc19cecbecfc1463846161d2a78793151927a5ab911c69a5d3013f7668e75a1d78a65667cb9d83910cda439cbe84d62
|
|
2862b56 [tests] remove redundant univalue_tests.cpp (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
univalue unit tests were added in #4730 , and exist at `/src/test/univalue_tests.cpp` (outside the univalue tree). That test was brought into the univalue repository in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/univalue/pull/4 , which was pulled into the github repository in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11420.
That means that the univalue test exists in two places:
1. `/src/test/univalue_tests.cpp`
2. `/src/univalue/test/object.cpp`
(2) is a strict superset of (1). It adds some macros to work around boost not being a univalue dependency, and adds a few extra lines of test.
Therefore remove `/src/test/univalue_tests.cpp`
Tree-SHA512: 3747b10bbf62e9f12363905488b29945ad559ddca68c5c03d8a362de612a51f408f41a04d3712c6889bfc1632fb1a5fa0d7df0fbf02c322b3981a6d698f501b0
|
|
12781db [Tests] check specific validation error in miner tests (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
## Problem
`BOOST_CHECK_THROW` merely checks that some `std::runtime_error` is
thrown, but not which one.
Here's an example of how this can cause a test to pass when a developer
introduces a consensus bug. The test for the sigops limit assumes
that `CreateNewBlock` fails with `bad-blk-sigops`. However it can
also fail with bad-txns-vout-negative, if a naive developer lowers
`BLOCKSUBSIDY` to `1*COIN`.
## Solution
`BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION` allows an additional predicate function. This
commit uses this for all exceptions that are checked for in
`miner_tets.cpp`:
* `bad-blk-sigops`
* `bad-cb-multiple`
* `bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent`
* `block-validation-failed`
If the function throws a different error, the test will fail. Although the message produced by Boost is a bit [confusing](http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Test-BOOST-CHECK-EXCEPTION-error-message-still-vague-tt4683257.html#a4683554), it does show which error was actually thrown. Here's what the above `1*COIN` bug would result in:
<img width="1134" alt="schermafbeelding 2017-09-02 om 23 42 29" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/29998976-815cabce-9038-11e7-9c46-f5f6cfb0ca7d.png">
## Other considerations
A more elegant solution in my opinion would be to subclass `std::runtime_error` for each `INVALID_TRANSACTION` type, but this would involve touching consensus code.
I put the predicates in `test_bitcoin.h` because I assume they can be reused in other test files. However [serialize_tests.cpp](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/v0.15.0rc3/src/test/serialize_tests.cpp#L245) also uses `BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION` and it defines the predicate in the test file itself.
Instead of four `IsRejectInvalidReasonX(std::runtime_error const& e)` functions, I'd prefer something reusable like `bool IsRejectInvalidReason(String reason)(std::runtime_error const& e)`, which would be used like `BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION(functionThatThrows(), std::runtime_error, IsRejectInvalidReason("bad-blk-sigops")`. I couldn't figure out how to do that in C++.
Tree-SHA512: e364f19b4ac19f910f6e8d6533357f57ccddcbd9d53dcfaf923d424d2b9711446d6f36da193208b35788ca21863eadaa7becd9ad890334d334bccf8c2e63dee1
|
|
6f39ac0 Add test for decoderawtransaction bool (MeshCollider)
bbdbe80 Add iswitness parameter to decode- and fundrawtransaction RPCs (MeshCollider)
Pull request description:
Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10481#issuecomment-325244946, this adds the option to explicitly choose whether a serialized transaction should be decoded as a witness or non-witness transaction rather than relying on the heuristic checks in #10481. The parameter defaults to relying on #10481 if not included, but it overrides that if included.
Tree-SHA512: d4846a5bb7d64dc19c516445488b00af329fc1f4181d9dfdf9f2382a086568edc98250a4ac7594e24a1bc231dfdee53c699b12c8380c355b920a67cc6770b7a9
|
|
fbf327b Minimal code changes to allow msvc compilation. (Aaron Clauson)
Pull request description:
These changes are required to allow the Bitcoin source to build with Microsoft's C++ compiler (#11562 is also required).
I looked around for a better place for the typedef of ssize_t which is in random.h. The best candidate looks like src/compat.h but I figured including that header in random.h is a bigger change than the typedef. Note that the same typedef is in at least two other places including the OpenSSL and Berkeley DB headers so some of the Bitcoin code already picks it up.
Tree-SHA512: aa6cc6283015e08ab074641f9abdc116c4dc58574dc90f75e7a5af4cc82946d3052370e5cbe855fb6180c00f8dc66997d3724ff0412e4b7417e51b6602154825
|
|
|
|
file already included
a720b92 Remove includes in .cpp files for things the corresponding .h file already included (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Remove includes in .cpp files for things the corresponding .h file already included.
Example case:
* `addrdb.cpp` includes `addrdb.h` and `fs.h`
* `addrdb.h` includes `fs.h`
Then remove the direct inclusion of `fs.h` in `addrman.cpp` and rely on the indirect inclusion of `fs.h` via the included `addrdb.h`.
In line with the header include guideline (see #10575).
Tree-SHA512: 8704b9de3011a4c234db336a39f7d2c139e741cf0f7aef08a5d3e05197e1e18286b863fdab25ae9638af4ff86b3d52e5cab9eed66bfa2476063aa5c79f9b0346
|
|
01013f5 Simplify tx validation tests (Pieter Wuille)
2dd6f80 Add a test that all flags are softforks (Pieter Wuille)
2851b77 Make all script verification flags softforks (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This change makes `SCRIPT_VERIFY_UPGRADABLE_NOPS` not apply to `OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` and `OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY`. This is a no-op as `UPGRADABLE_NOPS` is only set for mempool transactions, and those always have `SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` and `SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY` set as well. The advantage is that setting more flags now always results in a reduction in acceptable scripts (=softfork).
This results in a nice and testable property for validation, for which a new test is added.
This also means that the introduction of a new definition for a NOP or witness version will likely need the following procedure (example OP_NOP8 here)
* Remove OP_NOP8 from being affected by `SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS`.
* Add a `SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_NOP8`, which only applies to `OP_NOP8`.
* Add a `SCRIPT_VERIFY_NOP8` which implements the new consensus logic.
* Before activation, add `SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_NOP8` to the mempool flags.
* After activation, add `SCRIPT_VERIFY_NOP8` to both the mempool and consensus flags.
Tree-SHA512: d3b4538986ecf646aac9dba13a8d89318baf9e308e258547ca3b99e7c0509747f323edac6b1fea4e87e7d3c01b71193794b41679ae4f86f6e11ed6be3fd62c72
|
|
key length boundaries
a3f5657 Add test cases covering the relevant key length boundaries: 64 bytes +/- 1 byte for HMAC-SHA256 and 128 bytes +/- 1 byte for HMAC-SHA512 (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
* Add test cases covering the relevant key length boundaries: 64 bytes +/- 1 byte for HMAC-SHA256 and 128 bytes +/- 1 byte for HMAC-SHA512.
* ~~Avoid creating a one-past-the-end pointer in the case of key length 64 (HMAC-SHA256) and key length 128 (HMAC-SHA512).~~
* ~~Avoid performing a noop memset call (zero length argument) in the case of key length 64 (HMAC-SHA256) and key length 128 (HMAC-SHA512).~~
Tree-SHA512: 48ff9ab79d41aab97b5b8f6496cc08a39955a07eb424f74ada6440d3b168b6204d3527fa677e175c47e40142f9d62c7456ae162e5a2f5b557e90fb353beef1d0
|
|
bf20a7d [docs] Fixed outdated link with archive.is (Tim Shimmin)
Tree-SHA512: 7d316aa4c462213578a9a1e71b06a459924ed3bb681a0469cc3719b21a871a6350fff4656696057e362561ee10dc10e933fe1328ef454ab7e133ecf05549ec1c
|
|
The listed link is directing to an empty page, at least content-wise. I found the same page on archive.is and linked to that instead.
|
|
680bc2cbb Use range-based for loops (C++11) when looping over map elements (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Before this commit:
```c++
for (std::map<T1, T2>::iterator x = y.begin(); x != y.end(); ++x) {
T1 z = (*x).first;
…
}
```
After this commit:
```c++
for (auto& x : y) {
T1 z = x.first;
…
}
```
Tree-SHA512: 954b136b7f5e6df09f39248a6b530fd9baa9ab59d7c2c7eb369fd4afbb591b7a52c92ee25f87f1745f47b41d6828b7abfd395b43daf84a55b4e6a3d45015e3a0
|
|
blockchain.cpp has low unit test coverage. This commit is intended
to start improving its code coverage to reasonable levels. One or more
follow up commits will complete the task that this commit is starting
(though the usefulness of this commit is not dependent upon later
commits).
Note that these tests were not written based upon a specification of how
GetDifficulty *should* work, but rather how it actually *does* work. As
a result, if there are any bugs in the current GetDifficulty
implementation, these unit tests serve to lock them in rather than
expose them.
-- Why has blockchain.cpp been modified if this is a unit testing change?
Since the existing GetDifficulty function relies on a global variable,
chainActive, it was not suitable for unit testing purposes. Both the
existing GetDifficulty function and the unit tests now call through to
a new, more modular version of GetDifficulty that can work on any chain,
not just chainActive.
-- Why does blockchain_tests.cpp directly include blockchain.cpp instead
of blockchain.h?
While the new GetDifficulty function's signature is arguably better than
the old one's, it still isn't great, and doesn't seem to warrant inclusion
as part of the blockchain.h API, especially since only test code is
directly using it. If a better way of exposing the new GetDifficulty
function to unit tests exists, please mention it and the commit will be
updated accordingly.
-- Why is the test fixture named blockchain_difficulty_tests rather than
blockchain_tests?
The Bitcoin Core policy for naming unit test files is to match the the
file under test ("blockchain" becomes "blockchain_tests"). While this
commit complies with that, blockchain.cpp is a massive file, such that
having all of the unit tests in one file will tend towards disorder.
Since there will be a lot more tests added to this file, the intention
is to divide up different types of tests into different test fixtures
within the same file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
included
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
for f in \
src/*.cpp \
src/*.h \
src/bench/*.cpp \
src/bench/*.h \
src/compat/*.cpp \
src/compat/*.h \
src/consensus/*.cpp \
src/consensus/*.h \
src/crypto/*.cpp \
src/crypto/*.h \
src/crypto/ctaes/*.h \
src/policy/*.cpp \
src/policy/*.h \
src/primitives/*.cpp \
src/primitives/*.h \
src/qt/*.cpp \
src/qt/*.h \
src/qt/test/*.cpp \
src/qt/test/*.h \
src/rpc/*.cpp \
src/rpc/*.h \
src/script/*.cpp \
src/script/*.h \
src/support/*.cpp \
src/support/*.h \
src/support/allocators/*.h \
src/test/*.cpp \
src/test/*.h \
src/wallet/*.cpp \
src/wallet/*.h \
src/wallet/test/*.cpp \
src/wallet/test/*.h \
src/zmq/*.cpp \
src/zmq/*.h
do
base=${f%/*}/ relbase=${base#src/} sed -i "s:#include \"\(.*\)\"\(.*\):if test -e \$base'\\1'; then echo \"#include <\"\$relbase\"\\1>\\2\"; else echo \"#include <\\1>\\2\"; fi:e" $f
done
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
Add missing locks to tests to satisfy lock requirements (such as
EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(...) (Clang Thread Safety Analysis),
AssertLockHeld(...) and implicit lock assumptions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
* pcoinscatcher (CCoinsViewErrorCatcher)
* pcoinsdbview (CCoinsViewDB)
* pcoinsTip (CCoinsViewCache)
* pblocktree (CBlockTreeDB)
* Remove variables shadowing pcoinsdbview
|
|
|
|
BOOST_CHECK_THROW merely checks that some std::runtime_error is
thrown, but not which one.
One example of how this could lead to a test passing when a developer
introduces a consensus bug: the test for the sigops limit assumes
that CreateNewBlock fails with bad-blk-sigops. However it can
also fail with bad-txns-vout-negative, e.g. if a naive developer lowers
BLOCKSUBSIDY to 1*COIN in the test.
BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION allows an additional predicate function. This
commit uses this for all exceptions that are checked for in
miner_tets.cpp:
* bad-blk-sigops
* bad-cb-multiple
* bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent
* block-validation-failed
An instance of the CheckRejectInvalid class (for a given validation string)
is passed to BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION.
|
|
jnewbery)
d61845818 Have SegWit active by default (Pieter Wuille)
4bd89210a Unit tests for always-active versionbits. (Anthony Towns)
d07ee77ab Always-active versionbits support (Pieter Wuille)
18e071841 [consensus] Pin P2SH activation to block 173805 on mainnet (John Newbery)
526023aa7 Improve handling of BIP9Deployment limits (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Most tests shouldn't have to deal with the now-historical SegWit activation transition (and other deployments, but SegWit is certainly the hardest one to accomodate).
This PR makes a versionbits starttime of -1 equal to "always active", and enables it by default for SegWit on regtest. Individual tests can override this by using the existing `-vbparams` option.
A few unit tests and functional tests are adapted to indeed override vbparams, as they specifically test the transition.
This is in preparation for wallet SegWit support, but I thought having earlier eyes on it would be useful.
Tree-SHA512: 3f07a7b41cf46476e6c7a5c43244e68c9f41d223482cedaa4c02a3a7b7cd0e90cbd06b84a1f3704620559636a2268f5767d4c52d09c1b354945737046f618fe5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If our tip hasn't updated in a while, that may be because our peers are
not relaying blocks to us that we would consider valid. Allow connection
to an additional outbound peer in that circumstance.
Also, periodically check to see if we are exceeding our target number of
outbound peers, and disconnect the one which has least recently
announced a new block to us (choosing the newest such peer in the case
of tie).
|
|
BlockTransactionsRequest
fd3a2f3 [tests] Add fuzz testing for BlockTransactions and BlockTransactionsRequest (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
The `BlockTransactions` deserialization code is reachable with tainted data via `ProcessMessage(…, "BLOCKTXN", vRecv [tainted], …)`.
The same thing applies to `BlockTransactionsRequest` which is reachable via `"GETBLOCKTXN"`.
Tree-SHA512: 64560ea344bc6145b940472f99866b808725745b060dedfb315be400bd94e55399f50b982149645bd7af7ed9935fd28751d7daf0d3f94a8e2ed3bc52e3325ffb
|
|
|
|
|
|
byte for HMAC-SHA256 and 128 bytes +/- 1 byte for HMAC-SHA512
|
|
8c2f4b888 Expose more parallelism with relaxed atomics (suggested in #9938). Fix a test to check the exclusive or of two properties rather than just or. (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
This PR is in response to #10026 and some feedback on #9938.
~Locally, all the checkqueue tests ran 3.2X faster on my machine. The worst offender, `test_CheckQueue_Correct_Random` ran 3.4X faster.~
1. ~Removes `GetRand()` and replaces it with a single deterministic FastRandomContext instance.~ #10321 replicated this
1. Exposes more parallelism with relaxed atomics, increasing chance of catching a bug. This does not change performance on my machine.
1. Makes one test case more restrictive (xor instead of or, see #9938).
Tree-SHA512: a59dfbee0273c713525a130dfedc1c7ff26f50c2aaca1e94ef5d759b1d6ea6338ffbd97f863b9f6209750d8a788a15fa8ae1bf26774ed2473c520811337e6b00
|
