Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
586190f0b4740457cb86cba632e3d64e6dfe9b0c rpc/rest: Take and reuse local Chain/ChainState obj (Carl Dong)
bc3bd369027273278a0541f3b991eb71de831aa2 rpc: style: Improve BuriedForkDescPushBack signature (Carl Dong)
f99913969f92b8b9cef1b83f5ee8e6a9267b4af0 rpc: Remove unnecessary casting of block height (Carl Dong)
6a3d1920209cded0dae52fb9070a3530d9a4e5fd rpc: Tidy up local references (see commit message) (Carl Dong)
038854f31e3511e8bb6e163305cab0a96783d25b rest/rpc: Remove now-unused old Ensure functions (Carl Dong)
6fb65b49f4d393b091479be5a5df5a0a160cf986 scripted-diff: rest/rpc: Use renamed EnsureAny*() (Carl Dong)
1570c7ee98612366df031bebef9e0468fb57b8a2 rpc: Add renamed EnsureAny*() functions (Carl Dong)
306b1cd3eeb2502904ed4698646d2c86d028aad2 rpc: Add alt Ensure* functions acepting NodeContext (Carl Dong)
d7824acdb9b18fe8f151771a83ccae1681f16c66 rest: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
3f0893479908ca28d6127c8d0ada30737cb830be rest: Pass in NodeContext to rest_block (Carl Dong)
7be0671b950842fc3a17641a4a21501de0a800b5 rpc/rawtx: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
60dc05afc6f6388c6f86729a0edd7cb69f1748e0 rpc/mining: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
d485e815e2b62dc74a485569d08130dc3ef9ff63 rpc/blockchain: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
d0abf0bf429586e3a5b4c3231fe430dc29695481 rpc/*,rest: Add review-only assertion to EnsureChainman (Carl Dong)
cced0f46c9133e0fc6211e987421ad1d9be1a399 miner: Pass in previous CBlockIndex to RegenerateCommitments (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Overall PR: #20158 (tree-wide: De-globalize ChainstateManager)
Based on:
- [x] #21270 | [Bundle 4/n] Prune g_chainman usage in validation-adjacent modules
- [x] #21525 | [Bundle 4.5/n] Followup fixups to bundle 4
Note to reviewers:
1. This bundle may _apparently_ introduce usage of `g_chainman` or `::Chain(state|)Active()` globals, but these are resolved later on in the overall PR. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
2. There may be seemingly obvious local references to `ChainstateManager` or other validation objects which are not being used in callers of the current function in question, this is done intentionally to **_keep each commit centered around one function/method_** to ease review and to make the overall change systematic. We don't assume anything about our callers. Rest assured that once we are considering that particular caller in later commits, we will use the obvious local references. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
3. When changing a function/method that has many callers (e.g. `LookupBlockIndex` with 55 callers), it is sometimes easier (and less error-prone) to use a scripted-diff. When doing so, there will be 3 commits in sequence so that every commit compiles like so:
1. Add `new_function`, make `old_function` a wrapper of `new_function`, divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the local module only**
2. Scripted-diff to divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the rest of the codebase**
3. Remove `old_function`
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 586190f0b4740457cb86cba632e3d64e6dfe9b0c. Since last review, no changes to existing commits, just some simple new commits added: three new commits renaming std::any Ensure functions (scripted diff commit and manual pre/post commits), and one new commit factoring out a repeated `ActiveChain()` call made in a loop. Thanks for the updates!
jnewbery:
utACK 586190f0b4740457cb86cba632e3d64e6dfe9b0c
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 586190f0b4740457cb86cba632e3d64e6dfe9b0c 🍯
Tree-SHA512: 64b677fb50141805b55c3f1afe68fcd298f9a071a359bdcd63256d52e334f83e462f31fb3ebee9b630da8f1d912a03a128cfc38179e7aaec29a055744a98478c
|
|
Doing it there will reduce code bloat and also ensure no test can "forget" to reset it
|
|
Seems odd to have an option for non-deterministic tests
when the goal should be for all tests to be deterministic.
Can be reviewed with `--ignore-all-space`.
|
|
coinbaseKey.MakeNewKey(true); creates a compressed key and there is no reason
for the deterministic setup to use uncompressed ones.
|
|
|
|
693414d27181cf967f787a2ca72344e52c58c7f0 node/ifaces: ChainImpl: Use an accessor for ChainMan (Carl Dong)
98c4e252f0d09bebb2e4ad3289407459c2cda5d5 node/ifaces: NodeImpl: Use an accessor for ChainMan (Carl Dong)
7e8b5ee814b0b8c34acb20637ed4fc988ccba555 validation: Make BlockManager::LookupBlockIndex const (Carl Dong)
88aead263c61d86e5f836028f517cfbf2a575498 node: Avoid potential UB by asserting assumptions (Carl Dong)
1dd8ed7a8491e51b76eeb236b15b794d9254f674 net_processing: Move comments to declarations (Carl Dong)
07156eb387ea580be5e2ce4a1744992ce7575903 node/coinstats: Replace #include with fwd-declaration (Carl Dong)
7b8e976cd5ac78a22f1be2b2fed8562c693af5d9 miner: Add chainstate member to BlockAssembler (Carl Dong)
e62067e7bcad5a559899afff2e4a8e8b7e9f4301 Revert "miner: Pass in chainstate to BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock" (Carl Dong)
eede0647b06b6009080c4e536a2705e911d6ee19 Revert "scripted-diff: Invoke CreateNewBlock with chainstate" (Carl Dong)
0c1b2bc549aec77b247f0103652d883227841ac5 Revert "miner: Remove old CreateNewBlock w/o chainstate param" (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Chronological history of this changeset:
1. Bundle 4 (#21270) got merged
2. Posthumous reviews were posted
3. These changes were prepended in bundle 5
4. More reviews were added in bundle 5
5. Someone suggested that we split the prepended changes up to another PR
6. This is that PR
In the future, I will just do posthumous review changes in another PR instead. I apologize for the confusion.
Addresses posthumous reviews on bundle 4:
- From jnewbery:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#issuecomment-796738048
- I didn't fix this one, but I added a `TODO` comment so that we don't lost track of it
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592291225
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592296942
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592299738
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592301704
- From MarcoFalke:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593096212
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593097032
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593097867
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593100570
Addresses reviews on bundle 5:
- Checking chainman existence before locking cs_main
- MarcoFalke
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r596601776
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r596601876
- Appropriate locking, usage of chainman, and control flow in `src/node/interfaces.cpp`
- MarcoFalke
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r596601383
- jnewbery
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597029360
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597029921
- ryanofsky
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597163828
- Style/comment formatting changes
- jnewbery
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597026552
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597027186
- Making LookupBlockIndex const
- jnewbery
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597035062
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 693414d27181cf967f787a2ca72344e52c58c7f0 🛐
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 693414d27181cf967f787a2ca72344e52c58c7f0. I reviewed this previously as part of #21391. I am a fan of the increasingly complicated bundle numbering, and kind of hope there in the next round there is some way we can get bundles 5.333333 and 5.666667!
jamesob:
ACK 693414d27181cf967f787a2ca72344e52c58c7f0 ([`jamesob/ackr/21525.1.dongcarl.bundle_4_5_n_followup_f`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21525.1.dongcarl.bundle_4_5_n_followup_f))
Tree-SHA512: 9bdc199f70400d01764e1bd03c25bdb6cff26dcef60e4ca3b649baf8d017a2dfc1f058099067962b4b6ccd32d078002b1389d733039f4c337558cb70324c0ee3
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 46b7f29340acb399fbd2378508a204d8d8ee8fca.
|
|
|
|
node.context owns the CAddrMan. CConnman holds a reference to
the CAddrMan.
|
|
1a6323bdbe20bdb7b1c907d8fa0333ffa88b21ff doc: update developer notes for removal of MakeUnique (fanquake)
3ba2840e7ee81341b0748c0121aedc2e9305041a scripted-diff: remove MakeUnique<T>() (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Since requiring C++17, this is just pointless abstraction. I think we should just "tear the band-aid off" and remove it. Similar to the changes happening in #21366.
Also, having a comment saying this is deprecated doesn't prevent it's usage in new code. i.e : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20946#discussion_r561949731.
The repository is fairly quiet at the moment, so any potential complaints about having to rebase should be minimal. Might as well get this over and done with.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 1a6323bdbe20bdb7b1c907d8fa0333ffa88b21ff
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1a6323bdbe20bdb7b1c907d8fa0333ffa88b21ff: patch looks correct
ajtowns:
ACK 1a6323bdbe20bdb7b1c907d8fa0333ffa88b21ff -- code review only
glozow:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/1a6323bdbe20bdb7b1c907d8fa0333ffa88b21ff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 4a14b9611b60b9b3026b54d6f5a2dce4c5d9b63a7b93d7de1307512df736503ed84bac66e7b93372c76e3117f49bf9f29cd473d3a47cb41fb2775bc10234736f
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git rm src/util/memory.h
sed -i -e 's/MakeUnique/std::make_unique/g' $(git grep -l MakeUnique src)
sed -i -e '/#include <util\/memory.h>/d' $(git grep -l '#include <util/memory.h>' src)
sed -i -e '/util\/memory.h \\/d' src/Makefile.am
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
REQUIRES ATTENTION
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
find_regex='(\.|->)CreateNewBlock\(' \
&& git grep -l -E "$find_regex" -- src \
| grep -v '^src/miner\.\(cpp\|h\)$' \
| xargs sed -i -E 's@'"$find_regex"'@\0::ChainstateActive(), @g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
find_regex='\bAcceptToMemoryPool\(' \
&& git grep -l -E "$find_regex" -- src \
| grep -v '^src/validation\.\(cpp\|h\)$' \
| xargs sed -i -E 's@'"$find_regex"'@\0::ChainstateActive(), @g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
location if -logsourcelocations is set
b4511e2e2ed1a6077ae6826a9ee6b7a311293d08 log: Prefix log messages with function name if -logsourcelocations is set (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Prefix log messages with function name if `-logfunctionnames` is set.
Yes, exactly like `-logthreadnames` but for function names instead of thread names :)
This is a small developer ergonomics improvement: I've found this to be a cheap/simple way to correlate log output and originating function.
For me it beats the ordinary cycle of 1.) try to figure out a regexp matching the static part of the dynamic log message, 2.) `git grep -E 'Using .* MiB out of .* requested for signature cache'`, 3.) `mcedit filename.cpp` (`openemacs filename.cpp` works too!) and 4.) search for log message and scroll up to find the function name :)
Without any logging parameters:
```
$ src/bitcoind -regtest
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z Using RdRand as an additional entropy source
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z Using 16 MiB out of 32/2 requested for signature cache, able to store 524288 elements
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z Using 16 MiB out of 32/2 requested for script execution cache, able to store 524288 elements
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z Loaded best chain: hashBestChain=0fff88f13cb7b2c71f2a335e3a4fc328bf5beb436012afca590b1a11466e22ff height=0 date=2011-02-02T23:16:42Z progress=1.000000
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z block tree size = 1
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z nBestHeight = 0
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z Imported mempool transactions from disk: 0 succeeded, 0 failed, 0 expired, 0 already there, 0 waiting for initial broadcast
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z 0 addresses found from DNS seeds
```
With `-logthreadnames` and `-logfunctionnames`:
```
$ src/bitcoind -regtest -logthreadnames -logfunctionnames
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z [init] [ReportHardwareRand] Using RdRand as an additional entropy source
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z [init] [InitSignatureCache] Using 16 MiB out of 32/2 requested for signature cache, able to store 524288 elements
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z [init] [InitScriptExecutionCache] Using 16 MiB out of 32/2 requested for script execution cache, able to store 524288 elements
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z [init] [LoadChainTip] Loaded best chain: hashBestChain=0fff88f13cb7b2c71f2a335e3a4fc328bf5beb436012afca590b1a11466e22ff height=0 date=2011-02-02T23:16:42Z progress=1.000000
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z [init] [AppInitMain] block tree size = 1
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z [init] [AppInitMain] nBestHeight = 0
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z [loadblk] [LoadMempool] Imported mempool transactions from disk: 0 succeeded, 0 failed, 0 expired, 0 already there, 0 waiting for initial broadcast
2020-08-25T03:29:04Z [dnsseed] [ThreadDNSAddressSeed] 0 addresses found from DNS seeds
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK b4511e2e2ed1a6077ae6826a9ee6b7a311293d08
MarcoFalke:
review ACK b4511e2e2ed1a6077ae6826a9ee6b7a311293d08 🌃
Tree-SHA512: d100f5364630c323f31d275259864c597f7725e462d5f4bdedcc7033ea616d7fc0d16ef1b2af557e692f4deea73c6773ccfc681589e7bf6ba970b9ec169040c7
|
|
|
|
|
|
dc8be12510c2fd5a809d9a82d2c14b464b5e5a3f refactor: remove boost::thread_group usage (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Post #18710, there isn't much left using `boost::thread_group`, so should just be able to replace it with the standard library. This also removes the last use of `boost::thread_interrupted`.
After this change, last piece of Boost Thread we'd be using is `boost::shared_mutex`. See the commentary [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16684#issuecomment-726214696) as to why it may be non-trivial to swap that for `std::shared_mutex` in the near future.
Closes #17307
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK dc8be12510c2fd5a809d9a82d2c14b464b5e5a3f
MarcoFalke:
review ACK dc8be12510c2fd5a809d9a82d2c14b464b5e5a3f 🔁
jonatack:
Non-expert code review ACK dc8be12510c2fd5a809d9a82d2c14b464b5e5a3f, also checked range-diff since last review and that local debug build is clean with gcc 10.2.1-6 on Debian
Tree-SHA512: 5510e2d760cce824234207dc86b1551ca8f21cbf3a2ce753c0254a0d03ffd83c94e449aec202fb7bd76e6fc64df783a6b70a736b0add9ece3734bb9c8ce8fc2f
|
|
|
|
Instead use CChainState::ActivateBestChain, which is what the global one
calls anyway.
|
|
bb6fcc75d1ec94b733d1477c816351c50be5faf9 refactor: Drop boost::thread stuff in CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
6784ac471bb32b6bb8e2de60986f123eb4990706 bench: Use CCheckQueue local thread pool (Hennadii Stepanov)
dba30695fc42f45828db008e7e5b81cb2b5d8551 test: Use CCheckQueue local thread pool (Hennadii Stepanov)
01511776acb0c7ec216dc9c8112531067763f1cb Add local thread pool to CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
0ef938685b5c079a6f5a98daf0e3865d718d817b refactor: Use member initializers in CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- gets rid of `boost::thread_group` in the `CCheckQueue` class
- allows thread safety annotation usage in the `CCheckQueue` class
- is alternative to #14464 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18710#issuecomment-616618525, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18710#issuecomment-617291612)
Also, with this PR (I hope) it could be easier to resurrect a bunch of brilliant ideas from #9938.
Related: #17307
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK bb6fcc75d1ec94b733d1477c816351c50be5faf9
LarryRuane:
ACK bb6fcc75d1ec94b733d1477c816351c50be5faf9
jonatack:
Code review ACK bb6fcc75d1ec94b733d1477c816351c50be5faf9 and verified rebase to master builds cleanly with unit/functional tests green
Tree-SHA512: fddeb720d5a391b48bb4c6fa58ed34ccc3f57862fdb8e641745c021841c8340e35c5126338271446cbd98f40bd5484f27926aa6c3e76fa478ba1efafe72e73c1
|
|
|
|
|
|
const
31b136e5802e1b1e5f9a9589736afe0652f34da2 Don't declare de facto const reference variables as non-const (practicalswift)
1c65c075ee4c7f98d9c1fac5ed7576b96374d4e9 Don't declare de facto const member functions as non-const (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
_Meta: This is the second and final part of the `const` refactoring series (part one: #20581). **I promise: no more refactoring PRs from me in a while! :)** I'll now go back to focusing on fuzzing/hardening!_
Changes in this PR:
* Don't declare de facto const member functions as non-const
* Don't declare de facto const reference variables as non-const
Awards for finding candidates for the above changes go to:
* `clang-tidy`'s [`readability-make-member-function-const`](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/readability-make-member-function-const.html) check ([list of `clang-tidy` checks](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/list.html))
* `cppcheck`'s `constVariable` check ([list of `cppcheck` checks](https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/wiki/ListOfChecks/))
See #18920 for instructions on how to analyse Bitcoin Core using Clang Static Analysis, `clang-tidy` and `cppcheck`.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 31b136e5802e1b1e5f9a9589736afe0652f34da2
jonatack:
ACK 31b136e5802e1b1e5f9a9589736afe0652f34da2
theStack:
ACK 31b136e5802e1b1e5f9a9589736afe0652f34da2 :snowflake:
Tree-SHA512: f58f8f00744219426874379e9f3e9331132b9b48e954d24f3a85cbb858fdcc98009ed42ef7e7b4619ae8af9fc240a6d8bfc1c438db2e97b0ecd722a80dcfeffe
|
|
|
|
Previously, the validation_chainstatemanager_tests test suite
instantiated its own duplicate ChainstateManager on which tests were
performed.
This wasn't a problem for the specific actions performed in
that suite. However, the existence of this duplicate ChainstateManager
and the fact that many of our validation static functions reach for
g_chainman, ::Chain(state|)Active means we may end up acting on two
different CChainStates should we write more extensive tests in the
future.
This change adds a new ChainTestingSetup which performs all
initialization previously done by TestingSetup except:
1. RPC command registration
2. ChainState initialization
3. Genesis Activation
4. {Ban,Conn,Peer}Man initialization
Means that we will no longer need to initialize a duplicate
ChainstateManger in order to test the initialization codepaths of
CChainState and ChainstateManager.
Lastly, this change has the additional benefit of allowing for
review-only assertions meant to show correctness to work in future work
de-globalizing g_chainman.
In the test chainstatemanager_rebalance_caches, an additional
LoadGenesisBlock call is added as MaybeReblanaceCaches eventually calls
FlushBlockFile, which tries to access vinfoBlockFile[nLastBlockFile],
which is out of bounds when LoadGenesisBlock hasn't been called yet.
-----
Note for the future:
The class con/destructor inheritance structure we have for these
TestingSetup classes is probably not the most suitable abstraction. In
particular, for both TestingSetup and ChainTestingSetup, we need to stop
the scheduler first before anything else. Otherwise classes depending on
the scheduler may be referenced by the scheduler after said classes are
freed. This means that there's no clear parallel between our teardown
code and C++'s destructuring order for class hierarchies.
Future work should strive to coalesce (as much as possible) test and
non-test init codepaths and perhaps structure it in a more fail-proof
way.
|
|
|
|
This moves the CBlockPolicyEstimator to the NodeContext, which get rids
of two globals and allows us to conditionally create the
CBlockPolicyEstimator (and to remove a circular dep).
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
|
|
Since m_check_ratio is only set once and since the CTxMemPool object is
no longer a global variable, m_check_ratio can be passed into the
constructor of CTxMemPool. Since it is only read from after
initialization, m_check_ratio can also be made a const and hence no
longer needs to be guarded by the cs mutex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/PeerLogicValidation/PeerManager/g' $(git grep -l PeerLogicValidation ./src ./test)
sed -i 's/peer_logic/peerman/g' $(git grep -l peer_logic ./src ./test)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
PeerLogicValidation was originally net_processing's implementation to
the validation interface. It has since grown to contain much of
net_processing's logic. Therefore rename it to reflect its
responsibilities.
Suggested in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10756#pullrequestreview-53892618.
|
|
Keep a references to chainparams, rather than calling the global
Params() function every time it's needed. This is fine, since
globalChainParams does not get updated once it's been set, and it's
available at the point of constructing the PeerLogicValidation object.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fa9d5902f7d72e8cce105dd1b1f5a1062e304b10 scripted-diff: gArgs -> args (MarcoFalke)
fa33bc2dabbbd2d73961f9b0ce51420a3b6e4ad5 init: Capture copy of blocknotify setting for BlockNotifyCallback (MarcoFalke)
fa40017706e08b4de111e8e57aabeced60881a57 init: Pass reference to ArgsManager around instead of relying on global (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The gArgs global has several issues:
* gArgs is used by each process (bitcoind, bitcoin-qt, bitcoin-wallet, bitcoin-cli, bitcoin-tx, ...), but it is hard to determine which arguments are actually used by each process. For example arguments that have never been registered, but are still used, will always return the fallback value.
* Tests may run several sub-tests, which need different settings. So globals will have to be overwritten, but that is fragile on its own: e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19704#issuecomment-678259092 or #19511
The goal is to remove gArgs, but as a first step in that direction this pull will change gArgs in init to use a passed-in reference instead.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa9d5902f7d72e8cce105dd1b1f5a1062e304b10. Looks good. Nice day to remove some globals, and add some lambdas :+1:
fanquake:
ACK fa9d5902f7d72e8cce105dd1b1f5a1062e304b10 - I'm not as familiar with the settings & argument handling code, but this make sense, and is a step in the right direction towards a reduction in the usage of globals. Not a huge fan of the clang-formatting in the scripted diff.
jonasschnelli:
Concept ACK fa9d5902f7d72e8cce105dd1b1f5a1062e304b10
Tree-SHA512: ed00db5f826566c7e3b4d0b3d2ee0fc1a49a6e748e04e5c93bdd694ac7da5598749e73937047d5fce86150d764a067d2ca344ba4ae3eb2704cc5c4fa0d20940f
|
|
fad84b7e14ff92465bc17bfdaf1362bcffe092f6 test: Activate segwit in TestChain100Setup (MarcoFalke)
fa11ff29803ca4f5fd0035bede697448cff7d960 test: Pass empty tx pool to block assembler (MarcoFalke)
fa96574b0d2d2c0880447f163cd0280fb3551910 test: Move doxygen comment to header (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This fixes not only a TODO in the code, but also prevents a never ending source of uninitialized reads. E.g.
* #18376
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19704#issuecomment-678259092
* ...
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fad84b7e14ff92465bc17bfdaf1362bcffe092f6
Tree-SHA512: 64cf16a59656d49e022b603f3b06441ceae35a33a4253b4382bc8a89a56e08ad5412c8fa734d0fc7b58586f40ea6d57b348a3b4838bc6890a41ae2ec3902e378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, unrelated formatting fixups.
Can be reviewed with --word-diff-regex=.
|
|
Hold a reference to connman rather than a pointer because:
- PeerLogicValidation can't run without a connman
- The pointer never gets reseated
The alternative is to always assert that the pointer is non-null before
dereferencing.
Change the name from connman to m_connman at the same time to conform
with current style guidelines.
|
|
edc316020e8270dafc5e31465d532baebdafd3dd test: Remove duplicate NodeContext hacks (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Qt tests currently are currently using two NodeContext structs at the same time, one in interfaces::NodeImpl::m_context, and the other in BasicTestingSetup::m_node, and the tests have hacks transferring state between them.
Fix this by getting rid of the NodeImpl::m_context struct and making it a pointer. This way a common BitcoinApplication object can be used for all qt tests, but they can still have their own testing setups.
Non-test code is changing but non-test behavior is still the same as before.
Motivation for this PR is to be able to remove the "std::move(test.m_node.connman)" and mempool hacks for swapping individual NodeContext members in Qt tests, because followup PR #19099 adds yet another member (wallet_client) that needs to be swapped. After this change, the whole NodeContext struct can be swapped instead of individual members, so the workarounds are less fragile and invasive.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
crACK edc316020e8270dafc5e31465d532baebdafd3dd 🌮
promag:
ACK edc316020e8270dafc5e31465d532baebdafd3dd.
Tree-SHA512: c1650e4127f43a4020304ca7c13b5d9122fb5723aacd8fa1cf855d03c6052fcfb7685810aa2a5ef708561015f0022fecaacbad479295104ca45d2c17579466a4
|
|
|
|
f19fdd47a6371dcbe0760ef6f3c3c5adb31b1bb4 test: add test for CChainState::ResizeCoinsCaches() (James O'Beirne)
8ac3ef46999ed676ca3775f7b2f461d92f09a542 add ChainstateManager::MaybeRebalanceCaches() (James O'Beirne)
f36aaa6392fdbdac6891d92202d3efeff98754f4 Add CChainState::ResizeCoinsCaches (James O'Beirne)
b223111da2e0e9ceccef75df8a20252b0094b7bc txdb: add CCoinsViewDB::ChangeCacheSize (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
In the assumeutxo implementation draft (#15056), once a UTXO snapshot is loaded, a new chainstate object is created after initialization. This means that we have to reclaim some of the cache that we've allocated to the original chainstate (per `dbcache=`) to repurpose for the snapshot chainstate.
Furthermore, it makes sense to have different cache allocations depending on which chainstate is more active. While the snapshot chainstate is working to get to the network tip (and the background validation chainstate is idle), it makes sense that the snapshot chainstate should have the majority of cache allocation. And contrariwise once the snapshot has reached network tip, most of the cache should be given to the background validation chainstate.
This set of changes (detailed in the commit messages) allows us to dynamically resize the various coins caches. None of the functionality introduced here is used at the moment, but will be in the next AU PR (which introduces `ActivateSnapshot`).
`ChainstateManager::MaybeRebalanceCaches()` defines the (somewhat normative) cache allocations between the snapshot and background validation chainstates. I'd be interested in feedback if anyone has thoughts on the proportions I've set there.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
weak utACK f19fdd47a6371dcbe0760ef6f3c3c5adb31b1bb4 -- didn't find any major problems, but not super confident that I didn't miss anything
fjahr:
Code review ACK f19fdd4
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f19fdd47a6371dcbe0760ef6f3c3c5adb31b1bb4. Only change since last review is constructor cleanup (no change in behavior). I think the suggestions here from ajtowns and others are good, but shouldn't delay merging the PR (and hold up assumeutxo)
Tree-SHA512: fffb7847fb6993dd4a1a41cf11179b211b0b20b7eb5f7cf6266442136bfe9d43b830bbefcafd475bfd4af273f5573500594aa41fff03e0ed5c2a1e8562ff9269
|
|
Qt tests currently are currently using two NodeContext structs at the same
time, one in interfaces::NodeImpl::m_context, and the other in
BasicTestingSetup::m_node, and the tests have hacks transferring state between
them.
Fix this by getting rid of the NodeImpl::m_context struct and making it a
pointer. This way a common BitcoinApplication object can be used for all qt
tests, but they can still have their own testing setups.
Non-test code is changing but non-test behavior is still the same as before.
Motivation for this PR is to be able to remove the
"std::move(test.m_node.connman)" and mempool hacks for swapping individual
NodeContext members in Qt tests, because followup PR #19099 adds yet another
member (wallet_client) that needs to be swapped. After this change, the whole
NodeContext struct can be swapped instead of individual members, so the
workarounds are less fragile and invasive.
|