aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test/txvalidation_tests.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-06-26tests: Reduce compilation time and unneccessary recompiles by removing ↵practicalswift
unused includes in tests
2019-05-04Merge #15141: Rewrite DoS interface between validation and net_processingWladimir J. van der Laan
0ff1c2a838da9e8dc7f77609adc89124bbea3e2b Separate reason for premature spends (coinbase/locktime) (Suhas Daftuar) 54470e767bab37f9b7089782b1be73d5883bb244 Assert validation reasons are contextually correct (Suhas Daftuar) 2120c31521aa51aa1984ee33250b8320506d3a0f [refactor] Update some comments in validation.cpp as we arent doing DoS there (Matt Corallo) 12dbdd7a41bac73e51ed8f7b290b7671196bf9ea [refactor] Drop unused state.DoS(), state.GetDoS(), state.CorruptionPossible() (Matt Corallo) aa502b88d10c2c3ac56d9163555849b96dc4df1e scripted-diff: Remove DoS calls to CValidationState (Matt Corallo) 7721ad64f40a0c67edefaaf7353264d78df8803e [refactor] Prep for scripted-diff by removing some \ns which annoy sed. (Matt Corallo) 5e78c5734bb0c9aae7b0a7019a745b2d7059b3d9 Allow use of state.Invalid() for all reasons (Matt Corallo) 6b34bc6b6f54f85537494cbea3846d5d195a06d9 Fix handling of invalid headers (Suhas Daftuar) ef54b486d5333dfc85c56e6b933c81735196a25d [refactor] Use Reasons directly instead of DoS codes (Matt Corallo) 9ab2a0412e96e87956fe61257387683635213035 CorruptionPossible -> BLOCK_MUTATED (Matt Corallo) 6e55b292b0ea944897b6dc2f766446fd209af484 CorruptionPossible -> TX_WITNESS_MUTATED (Matt Corallo) 7df16e70e67c753c871797ce947ea09d7cb0e519 LookupBlockIndex -> CACHED_INVALID (Matt Corallo) c8b0d22698385f91215ce8145631e3d5826dc977 [refactor] Drop redundant nDoS, corruptionPossible, SetCorruptionPossible (Matt Corallo) 34477ccd39a8d4bfa8ad612f22d5a46291922185 [refactor] Add useful-for-dos "reason" field to CValidationState (Matt Corallo) 6a7f8777a0b193fae4f976196f3464ffac01bf1b Ban all peers for all block script failures (Suhas Daftuar) 7b999103e21509e1c2dec10f68e48744ffe90f55 Clean up banning levels (Matt Corallo) b8b4c80146780f9011abbd1be72343cc965c07b9 [refactor] drop IsInvalid(nDoSOut) (Matt Corallo) 8818729013e17c650a25f030b2b80e0997389155 [refactor] Refactor misbehavior ban decisions to MaybePunishNode() (Matt Corallo) 00e11e61c0211a62788611cd6a6714a393fdc26c [refactor] rename stateDummy -> orphan_state (Matt Corallo) f34fa719cf33a51d11f1d2219cbe73ccff6fd697 Drop obsolete sigops comment (Matt Corallo) Pull request description: This is a rebase of #11639 with some fixes for the last few comments which were not yet addressed. The original PR text, with some strikethroughs of text that is no longer correct: > This cleans up an old main-carryover - it made sense that main could decide what DoS scores to assign things because the DoS scores were handled in a different part of main, but now validation is telling net_processing what DoS scores to assign to different things, which is utter nonsense. Instead, we replace CValidationState's nDoS and CorruptionPossible with a general ValidationInvalidReason, which net_processing can handle as it sees fit. I keep the behavior changes here to a minimum, but in the future we can utilize these changes for other smarter behavior, such as disconnecting/preferring to rotate outbound peers based on them providing things which are invalid due to SOFT_FORK because we shouldn't ban for such cases. > > This is somewhat complementary with, though obviously conflicts heavily with #11523, which added enums in place of DoS scores, as well as a few other cleanups (which are still relevant). > > Compared with previous bans, the following changes are made: > > Txn with empty vin/vout or null prevouts move from 10 DoS > points to 100. > Loose transactions with a dependency loop now result in a ban > instead of 10 DoS points. > ~~BIP68-violation no longer results in a ban as it is SOFT_FORK.~~ > ~~Non-SegWit SigOp violation no longer results in a ban as it > considers P2SH sigops and is thus SOFT_FORK.~~ > ~~Any script violation in a block no longer results in a ban as > it may be the result of a SOFT_FORK. This should likely be > fixed in the future by differentiating between them.~~ > Proof of work failure moves from 50 DoS points to a ban. > Blocks with timestamps under MTP now result in a ban, blocks > too far in the future continue to not result in a ban. > Inclusion of non-final transactions in a block now results in a > ban instead of 10 DoS points. Note: The change to ban all peers for consensus violations is actually NOT the change I'd like to make -- I'd prefer to only ban outbound peers in those situations. The current behavior is a bit of a mess, however, and so in the interests of advancing this PR I tried to keep the changes to a minimum. I plan to revisit the behavior in a followup PR. EDIT: One reviewer suggested I add some additional context for this PR: > The goal of this work was to make net_processing aware of the actual reasons for validation failures, rather than just deal with opaque numbers instructing it to do something. > > In the future, I'd like to make it so that we use more context to decide how to punish a peer. One example is to differentiate inbound and outbound peer misbehaviors. Another potential example is if we'd treat RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE failures differently (ie after the next consensus change is implemented), and perhaps again we'd want to treat some peers differently than others. ACKs for commit 0ff1c2: jnewbery: utACK 0ff1c2a838da9e8dc7f77609adc89124bbea3e2b ryanofsky: utACK 0ff1c2a838da9e8dc7f77609adc89124bbea3e2b. Only change is dropping the first commit (f3883a321bf4ab289edcd9754b12cae3a648b175), and dropping the temporary `assert(level == GetDoS())` that was in 35ee77f2832eaffce30042e00785c310c5540cdc (now c8b0d22698385f91215ce8145631e3d5826dc977) Tree-SHA512: e915a411100876398af5463d0a885920e44d473467bb6af991ef2e8f2681db6c1209bb60f848bd154be72d460f039b5653df20a6840352c5f7ea5486d9f777a3
2019-05-02[refactor] Add useful-for-dos "reason" field to CValidationStateMatt Corallo
This is a first step towards cleaning up our DoS interface - make validation return *why* something is invalid, and let net_processing figure out what that implies in terms of banning/disconnection/etc. Behavior change: peers will now be banned for providing blocks with premature coinbase spends. Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au> Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
2019-05-02[refactor] drop IsInvalid(nDoSOut)Matt Corallo
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
2019-04-11scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers in test, benchMarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- ./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./src/bench/ ./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./src/test/ -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2019-04-11scripted-diff: Rename test_bitcoin to test/setup_commonMarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i --regexp-extended -e 's/test_bitcoin\.(h|cpp)/setup_common.\1/g' $(git grep -l test_bitcoin) git mv ./src/test/test_bitcoin.h ./src/test/setup_common.h git mv ./src/test/test_bitcoin.cpp ./src/test/setup_common.cpp sed -i -e 's/BITCOIN_TEST_TEST_BITCOIN_H/BITCOIN_TEST_SETUP_COMMON_H/g' ./src/test/setup_common.h -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2018-12-29Update copyright headers to 2018DrahtBot
2018-07-07Don't assert(foo()) where foo has side effectspracticalswift
2017-11-21trivial: Fix unsuccessful typopracticalswift
2017-11-18[tests] Test that mempool rejects coinbase transactionsJames O'Beirne