Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The script provided for signature might be externally provided, for
instance by way of 'finalizepsbt'. Therefore the script might be
ill-crafted, so don't assume pubkeys are always 32 bytes.
Thanks to Niklas for finding this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We make the Satisfier a base in which to store the common methods
between the Tapscript and P2WSH satisfier, and from which they both
inherit.
A field is added to SignatureData to be able to satisfy pkh() under
Tapscript context (to get the pubkey hash preimage) without wallet data.
For instance in `finalizepsbt` RPC. See also the next commits for a
functional test that exercises this.
|
|
We'll need the Miniscript satisfier for Tapscript too.
|
|
We are going to introduce Tapscript support in Miniscript, for which
some of Miniscript rules and properties change (new or modified
fragments, different typing rules, different resources consumption, ..).
|
|
Since script/standard only contains things that are used by the Solver
and its callers, rename the files to script/solver.
|
|
CScriptID should be next to CScript just as CKeyID is next to CPubKey
|
|
6c7a17a8e0eec377f83ed1399f003ae70b898270 psbt: support externally provided preimages for Miniscript satisfaction (Antoine Poinsot)
840a396029316896beda46600aec3c1af09a899c qa: add a "smart" Miniscript fuzz target (Antoine Poinsot)
17e3547241d593bc92c5c6b36c54284d9d9f3feb qa: add a fuzz target generating random nodes from a binary encoding (Antoine Poinsot)
611e12502a5887ffb751bb92fadaa334d484824b qa: functional test Miniscript signing with key and timelocks (Antoine Poinsot)
d57b7f2021d2369f6e88cdf0f562aab27c51beaf refactor: make descriptors in Miniscript functional test more readable (Antoine Poinsot)
0a8fc9e200b5018c1efd6f9126eb405ca0beeea3 wallet: check solvability using descriptor in AvailableCoins (Antoine Poinsot)
560e62b1e221832ae99ff8684559a7b8f9df84a7 script/sign: signing support for Miniscripts with hash preimage challenges (Antoine Poinsot)
a2f81b6a8f1ff3b0750711409c7538812a52ef40 script/sign: signing support for Miniscript with timelocks (Antoine Poinsot)
61c6d1a8440db09c44d7fd367a6f2c641ea93d40 script/sign: basic signing support for Miniscript descriptors (Antoine Poinsot)
4242c1c52127df3a24be0c15b88d4fc463af04fc Align 'e' property of or_d and andor with website spec (Pieter Wuille)
f5deb417804b9f267830bd40177677987df4526d Various additional explanations of the satisfaction logic from Pieter (Pieter Wuille)
22c5b00345063bdeb8b6d3da8b5692d18f92bfb7 miniscript: satisfaction support (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
This makes the Miniscript descriptors solvable.
Note this introduces signing support for much more complex scripts than the wallet was previously able to solve, and the whole tooling isn't provided for a complete Miniscript integration in the wallet. Particularly, the PSBT<->Miniscript integration isn't entirely covered in this PR.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6c7a17a8e0eec377f83ed1399f003ae70b898270
sipa:
utACK 6c7a17a8e0eec377f83ed1399f003ae70b898270 (to the extent that it's not my own code).
Tree-SHA512: a71ec002aaf66bd429012caa338fc58384067bcd2f453a46e21d381ed1bacc8e57afb9db57c0fb4bf40de43b30808815e9ebc0ae1fbd9e61df0e7b91a17771cc
|
|
Preimages must be externally provided (typically, via a PSBT).
|
|
|
|
Try to solve a script using the Miniscript satisfier if the legacy
solver fails under P2WSH context. Only solve public key and public key
hash challenges for now.
We don't entirely replace the raw solver and especially rule out trying to
solve CHECKMULTISIG-based multisigs with the Miniscript satisfier since
some features, such as the transaction input combiner, rely on the
specific behaviour of the former.
|
|
6879be691bf636a53208ef058f2ebe18bfa8017c refactor: Extract RIPEMD160 (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
To directly return a CRIPEMD160 hash from data.
Simplifies the call sites.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6879be691bf636a53208ef058f2ebe18bfa8017c
theStack:
re-ACK 6879be691bf636a53208ef058f2ebe18bfa8017c
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 6879be691bf636a53208ef058f2ebe18bfa8017c 🏔
Tree-SHA512: 6ead85d8060c2ac6afd43ec716ff5a82d6754c4132fe7df3b898541fa19f1dfd8b301b2b66ae7cb7594b1b1a8c7f68bce3790a8c610d4a1164e995d89bc5ae34
|
|
To directly return a CRIPEMD160 hash from data.
Incidentally, decoding this acronym:
* RIPEMD -> RIPE Message Digest
* RIPE -> RACE Integrity Primitives Evaluation
* RACE -> Research and Development in Advanced Communications Technologies in Europe
|
|
scripts until the tapleaf version is known
dee89438b82e94474ebaa31367035f98b4636dac Abstract out ComputeTapbranchHash (Russell O'Connor)
8e3fc9942729716e95907008fcf36eee758c3a6a Do not use CScript for tapleaf scripts until the tapleaf version is known (Russell O'Connor)
Pull request description:
While BIP-341 calls the contents of tapleaf a "script", only in the case that the tapleaf version is `0xc0` is this script known to be a tapscript. Otherwise the tapleaf "script" is simply an uninterpreted string of bytes.
This PR corrects the issue where the type `CScript` is used prior to the tapleaf version being known to be a tapscript. This prevents `CScript` methods from erroneously being called on non-tapscript data.
A second commit abstracts out the TapBranch hash computation in the same manner that the TapLeaf computation is already abstracted. These two abstractions ensure that the TapLeaf and TapBranch tagged hashes are always constructed properly.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK dee89438b82e94474ebaa31367035f98b4636dac
instagibbs:
ACK dee89438b82e94474ebaa31367035f98b4636dac
achow101:
ACK dee89438b82e94474ebaa31367035f98b4636dac
sipa:
ACK dee89438b82e94474ebaa31367035f98b4636dac
aureleoules:
reACK dee89438b82e94474ebaa31367035f98b4636dac - I verified that there is no behavior change.
Tree-SHA512: 4a1d37f3e9a1890e7f5eadcf65562688cc451389581fe6e2da0feb2368708edacdd95392578d8afff05270d88fc61dce732d83d1063d84d12cf47b5f4633ec7e
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Commits of previous years:
- 2021: f47dda2c58b5d8d623e0e7ff4e74bc352dfa83d7
- 2020: fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
- 2019: aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
|
|
Prevents use of CScript methods until the tapleaf is known to be a tapscript.
|
|
Taproot pubkey info was not being added for multi_a signing. The filling
of this info is moved into the common function CreateTaprootScriptSig so
that any signing of taproot scripts will include the pubkey info.
|
|
|
|
b16f93caddcd3254eaf3dc43e09adf2142a9c40a script/sign: remove needless IsSolvable() utility (Antoine Poinsot)
c232ef20c0fd2e3b55355e52684091cad3af5247 outputtype: remove redundant check for uncompressed keys in AddAndGetDestinationForScript (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Now that we have descriptors there is no need to try to sign for a scriptPubKey using dummy signatures, and using a mocked verification of this witness against the interpreter, just to make sure we know how to spend such a Script. Just try to infer a solvable descriptor: any scriptPubKey that we can sign for can be inferred as such.
This came up in #24149 but i think it's worth it on its own.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25664/commits/b16f93caddcd3254eaf3dc43e09adf2142a9c40a
achow101:
re-ACK b16f93caddcd3254eaf3dc43e09adf2142a9c40a
furszy:
ACK b16f93ca, only change is the `IsSolvable` helper function removal.
Tree-SHA512: 137068157ce90210b710b1bf9ac3c400e2ff5af1112f892094b69875ea473d6a899f52adb51e5030cb907dee517602059cd1661107808558efa5de842ba12b41
|
|
It was used back when we didn't have a concept of descriptor. Now we
can check for solvability using descriptors.
|
|
(tweaked) output key
544b4332f0e122167bdb94dc963405422faa30cb Add wallet tests for spending rawtr() (Pieter Wuille)
e1e3081200a71b6c9b0dcf236bc2a37ed1aa7552 If P2TR tweaked key is available, sign with it (Pieter Wuille)
8d9670ccb756592bddb2a269bf5078d62658537b Add rawtr() descriptor for P2TR with unknown tweak (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
It may be useful to be able to represent P2TR outputs in descriptors whose script tree and/or internal key aren't known. This PR does that, by adding a `rawtr(KEY)` descriptor, where the KEY represents the output key directly. If the private key corresponding to that output key is known, it also permits signing with it.
I'm not convinced this is desirable, but presumably "tr(KEY)" sounds more intended for direct use than "rawtr(KEY)".
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 544b4332f0e122167bdb94dc963405422faa30cb
sanket1729:
code review ACK 544b4332f0e122167bdb94dc963405422faa30cb
w0xlt:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23480/commits/544b4332f0e122167bdb94dc963405422faa30cb
Tree-SHA512: 0de08de517468bc22ab0c00db471ce33144f5dc211ebc2974c6ea95709f44e830532ec5cdb0128c572513d352120bd651c4559516d4500b5b0a3d257c4b45aca
|
|
|
|
|
|
The taproot spenddata stored in a sigdata is the combination of data
existing previously (e.g. in a PSBT) and the data stored in a
SigningProvider. In order to use the external data when signing, we need
to be using the sigdata's spenddata.
|
|
Actually use pre-existing signatures in CreateTaprootScriptSig if a
signature is found for the given key and leaf hash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
multisig inside tr
4828d53eccd52a67631c64cef0ba7df90dff138d Add (sorted)multi_a descriptors to doc/descriptors.md (Pieter Wuille)
b5f33ac1f82aea290b4653af36ac2ad1bf1cce7b Simplify wallet_taproot.py functional test (Pieter Wuille)
eb0667ea96d52db9135514a5e95ab943f6abd8a6 Add tests for (sorted)multi_a derivation/signing (Pieter Wuille)
c17c6aa08df81aa0086d80b50187c8cd60ecc222 Add signing support for (sorted)multi_a scripts (Pieter Wuille)
3eed6fca57d1fa7544f372e6e7de0a9ae1b5715a Add multi_a descriptor inference (Pieter Wuille)
79728c4a3d8a74f276daf1e72abbdecdab85a5d8 Add (sorted)multi_a descriptor and script derivation (Pieter Wuille)
25e95f9ff89a97b87ce218f28274c3c821b2d54d Merge/generalize IsValidMultisigKeyCount/GetMultisigKeyCount (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This adds a new `multi_a(k,key_1,key_2,...,key_n)` (and corresponding `sortedmulti_a`) descriptor for k-of-n policies inside `tr()`. Semantically it is very similar to the existing `multi()` descriptor, but with the following changes:
* The corresponding script is `<key1> OP_CHECKSIG <key2> OP_CHECKSIGADD <key3> OP_CHECKSIGADD ... <key_n> OP_CHECKSIGADD <k> OP_NUMEQUAL`, rather than the traditional `OP_CHECKMULTISIG`-based script, making it usable inside the `tr()` descriptor.
* The keys can optionally be specified in x-only notation.
* Both the number of keys and the threshold can be as high as 999; this is the limit due to the consensus stacksize=1000 limit
I expect that this functionality will later be replaced with a miniscript-based implementation, but I don't think it's necessary to wait for that.
Limitations:
* The wallet code will for not estimate witness size incorrectly for script path spends, which may result in a (dramatic) fee underpayment with large multi_a scripts.
* The multi_a script construction is (slightly) suboptimal for n-of-n (where a `<key1> OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY ... <key_n-1> OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY <key_n> OP_CHECKSIG` would be better). Such a construction is not included here.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 4828d53eccd52a67631c64cef0ba7df90dff138d
gruve-p:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24043/commits/4828d53eccd52a67631c64cef0ba7df90dff138d
sanket1729:
code review ACK 4828d53eccd52a67631c64cef0ba7df90dff138d
darosior:
Code review ACK 4828d53eccd52a67631c64cef0ba7df90dff138d
Tree-SHA512: 5dcd434b79585f0ff830f7d501d27df5e346f5749f47a3109ec309ebf2cbbad0e1da541eec654026d911ab67fd7cf7793fab0f765628d68d81b96ef2a4d234ce
|
|
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Commits of previous years:
* 2020: fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
* 2019: aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
|
|
module
SerializeToVector, UnserializeFromVector, DeserializeHDKeypaths, and SerializeHDKeypaths
were in sign.h where PSBT was originally implemented. Since all of the PSBT serialization
has moved to its own file, these functions should follow.
|
|
|
|
Argument names of "nInIn" are not helpful.
|
|
libsecp256k1's secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign only follows BIP340 exactly
if an aux_rand32 argument is passed. When no randomness is used
(as is the case in the current codebase here), there is no impact
on security between not providing aux_rand32 at all, or providing
an empty one. Yet, for repeatability/testability it is simpler
to always use an all-zero one.
|
|
Move amount.h to consensus/amount.h.
Renames, adds missing and removes uneeded includes.
|
|
The places where we need to lookup information for a XOnlyPubKey
currently implement a hack which makes both serializations of the full
pubkey in order to try the CKeyIDs for the lookup functions. Instead of
duplicating this everywhere it is needed, we can consolidate the CKeyID
generation into a function, and then have wrappers around GetPubKey,
GetKey, and GetKeyOrigin which takes the XOnlyPubKey, retrieves all of
the CKeyIDs (using the new GetKeyIDs() function in XOnlyPubKey), and
tries their respective underlying lookup function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
92993aa5cf37995e65e68dfd6f129ecaf418e01c Change SignTransaction's input_errors to use bilingual_str (Andrew Chow)
171366e89b828a557f8262d9dc14ff7a03f813f7 Use bilingual_str for address fetching functions (Andrew Chow)
9571c69b51115454c6a699be9492024f7b46c2b4 Add bilingual_str::clear() (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
In a couple of places in the wallet, errors are `std::string`. In order for these errors to be translated, change them to use `bilingual_str`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 92993aa5cf37995e65e68dfd6f129ecaf418e01c, only rebased since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22337#pullrequestreview-694542729) review, verified with
klementtan:
Code review ACK 92993aa5cf37995e65e68dfd6f129ecaf418e01c
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 92993aa5cf37995e65e68dfd6f129ecaf418e01c
Tree-SHA512: 5400e419dd87db8c49b67ed0964de2d44b58010a566ca246f2f0760ed9ef6a9b6f6df7a6adcb211b315b74c727bfe8c7d07eb5690b5922fa5828ceef4c83461f
|
|
|
|
|
|
For non-Taproot signatures, this is interpreted as SIGHASH_ALL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|