aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/rpc
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-06-27Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27896: Remove the syscall sandboxAndrew Chow
32e2ffc39374f61bb2435da507f285459985df9e Remove the syscall sandbox (fanquake) Pull request description: After initially being merged in #20487, it's no-longer clear that an internal syscall sandboxing mechanism is something that Bitcoin Core should have/maintain, especially when compared to better maintained/supported alterantives, i.e [firejail](https://github.com/netblue30/firejail). There is more related discussion in #24771. Note that given where it's used, the sandbox also gets dragged into the kernel. If it's removed, this should not require any sort of deprecation, as this was only ever an opt-in, experimental feature. Closes #24771. ACKs for top commit: davidgumberg: crACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27896/commits/32e2ffc39374f61bb2435da507f285459985df9e achow101: ACK 32e2ffc39374f61bb2435da507f285459985df9e dergoegge: ACK 32e2ffc39374f61bb2435da507f285459985df9e Tree-SHA512: 8cf71c5623bb642cb515531d4a2545d806e503b9d57bfc15a996597632b06103d60d985fd7f843a3c1da6528bc38d0298d6b8bcf0be6f851795a8040d71faf16
2023-06-20scripted-diff: Following the C++ Standard rules for identifiers with _.Brotcrunsher
Any identifier starting with two _, or one _ followed by a capital letter is reserved for the compiler and thus must not be used. See: https://stackoverflow.com/a/228797/7130273 -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- s() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; } s '__pushKV' 'pushKVEnd' s '_EraseTx' 'EraseTxNoLock' s '_Other' 'Other' -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2023-06-16Remove the syscall sandboxfanquake
After initially being merged in #20487, it's no-longer clear that an internal syscall sandboxing mechanism is something that Bitcoin Core should have/maintain, especially when compared to better maintained/supported alterantives, i.e firejail. Note that given where it's used, the sandbox also gets dragged into the kernel. There is some related discussion in #24771. This should not require any sort of deprecation, as this was only ever an opt-in, experimental feature. Closes #24771.
2023-06-07Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27501: mempool / rpc: add getprioritisedtransactions, ↵Andrew Chow
delete a mapDeltas entry when delta==0 67b7fecacd0489809690982c89ba2d0acdca938c [mempool] clear mapDeltas entry if prioritisetransaction sets delta to 0 (glozow) c1061acb9d502cdf8c6996c818d9a8a281cbe40c [functional test] prioritisation is not removed during replacement and expiry (glozow) 0e5874f0b06114d9b077e0ff582915e4f83059e6 [functional test] getprioritisedtransactions RPC (glozow) 99f8046829f699ff2eace266aa8cea1d9f7cb65a [rpc] add getprioritisedtransactions (glozow) 9e9ca36c80013749faaf2aa777d52bd07d9d24ec [mempool] add GetPrioritisedTransactions (glozow) Pull request description: Add an RPC to get prioritised transactions (also tells you whether the tx is in mempool or not), helping users clean up `mapDeltas` manually. When `CTxMemPool::PrioritiseTransaction` sets a delta to 0, remove the entry from `mapDeltas`. Motivation / Background - `mapDeltas` entries are never removed from mapDeltas except when the tx is mined in a block or conflicted. - Mostly it is a feature to allow `prioritisetransaction` for a tx that isn't in the mempool {yet, anymore}. A user can may resbumit a tx and it retains its priority, or mark a tx as "definitely accept" before it is seen. - Since #8448, `mapDeltas` is persisted to mempool.dat and loaded on restart. This is also good, otherwise we lose prioritisation on restart. - Note the removal due to block/conflict is only done when `removeForBlock` is called, i.e. when the block is received. If you load a mempool.dat containing `mapDeltas` with transactions that were mined already (e.g. the file was saved prior to the last few blocks), you don't delete them. - Related: #4818 and #6464. - There is no way to query the node for not-in-mempool `mapDeltas`. If you add a priority and forget what the value was, the only way to get that information is to inspect mempool.dat. - Calling `prioritisetransaction` with an inverse value does not remove it from `mapDeltas`, it just sets the value to 0. It disappears on a restart (`LoadMempool` checks if delta is 0), but that might not happen for a while. Added together, if a user calls `prioritisetransaction` very regularly and not all those transactions get mined/conflicted, `mapDeltas` might keep lots of entries of delta=0 around. A user should clean up the not-in-mempool prioritisations, but that's currently difficult without keeping track of what those txids/amounts are. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 67b7fecacd0489809690982c89ba2d0acdca938c theStack: Code-review ACK 67b7fecacd0489809690982c89ba2d0acdca938c instagibbs: code review ACK 67b7fecacd0489809690982c89ba2d0acdca938c ajtowns: ACK 67b7fecacd0489809690982c89ba2d0acdca938c code review only, some nits Tree-SHA512: 9df48b622ef27f33db1a2748f682bb3f16abe8172fcb7ac3c1a3e1654121ffb9b31aeaad5570c4162261f7e2ff5b5912ddc61a1b8beac0e9f346a86f5952260a
2023-06-02Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27256: refactor: rpc: Remove unnecessary uses of ↵fanquake
ParseNonRFCJSONValue() and rename it cfbc8a623b5133f1d0b0c0c9be73b2b107e0d687 refactor: rpc: hide and rename ParseNonRFCJSONValue() (stickies-v) 6c8bde6d54d03224709dce54b8ba32b8c3e37ac7 test: move coverage on ParseNonRFCJSONValue() to UniValue::read() (stickies-v) Pull request description: Follow-up to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26612#issuecomment-1453623741. As per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26506#pullrequestreview-1211984059, `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` is no longer necessary and we can use `UniValue::read()` directly: > IIRC before that PR UniValue::read could only parse JSON object and array values, but now it will parse string/number/boolean/null values as well. laanwj pointed this out in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9028#issuecomment-257885368 The implementation of `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` was already [simplified in #26612](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26612/files#diff-84c7a7f36362b9724c31e5dec9879b2f81eae0d0addbc9c0933c3558c577de65R259-R263) and [test coverage updated](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26612/files#diff-fc0f86b6c3bb23b0e983bcf79d7546d1c9eaa15d6e4d8a7b03b5b85955f585abR292-R312) to ensure behaviour didn't change. To avoid code duplication, we keep the function to throw on invalid input data but rename it to `Parse()` and remove it from the header. The existing test coverage we had on `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` is moved over to `UniValue::read()`. ACKs for top commit: ryanofsky: Code review ACK cfbc8a623b5133f1d0b0c0c9be73b2b107e0d687. Only change since last review is adding a new test Tree-SHA512: 89be959d2353af7ace0c1348ba1600b9ac1d3c7b3cf7f0b59f6e005b7fb9d695ce3e8720e1be3cf77fe7e318a4017c880df108928e7179ec50447583d13bc781
2023-06-01Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26485: RPC: Accept options as named-only parametersAndrew Chow
2cd28e9fef5dd743bcd70025196ee311fcfdcae4 rpc: Add check for unintended option/parameter name clashes (Ryan Ofsky) 95d7de0964620a3f7386a4adc5707559868abf84 test: Update python tests to use named parameters instead of options objects (Ryan Ofsky) 96233146dd31c1d99fd1619be4449944623ef750 RPC: Allow RPC methods accepting options to take named parameters (Ryan Ofsky) 702b56d2a8ce48bc3b66a2867d09fa11dcf12fc5 RPC: Add add OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type (Ryan Ofsky) Pull request description: Allow RPC methods which take an `options` parameter (`importmulti`, `listunspent`, `fundrawtransaction`, `bumpfee`, `send`, `sendall`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `simulaterawtransaction`), to accept the options as named parameters, without the need for nested JSON objects. This makes it possible to make calls like: ```sh src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid fee_rate=10 ``` instead of ```sh src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid options='{"fee_rate": 10}' ``` RPC help is also updated to show options as top level named arguments instead of as nested objects. <details><summary>diff</summary> <p> ```diff @@ -15,16 +15,17 @@ Arguments: 1. txid (string, required) The txid to be bumped -2. options (json object, optional) +2. options (json object, optional) Options object that can be used to pass named arguments, listed below. + +Named Arguments: - { - "conf_target": n, (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks +conf_target (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks - "fee_rate": amount, (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation) +fee_rate (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation) Specify a fee rate in sat/vB instead of relying on the built-in fee estimator. Must be at least 1.000 sat/vB higher than the current transaction fee rate. WARNING: before version 0.21, fee_rate was in BTC/kvB. As of 0.21, fee_rate is in sat/vB. - "replaceable": bool, (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be +replaceable (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be marked bip-125 replaceable. If true, the sequence numbers in the transaction will be left unchanged from the original. If false, any input sequence numbers in the original transaction that were less than 0xfffffffe will be increased to 0xfffffffe @@ -32,11 +33,10 @@ still be replaceable in practice, for example if it has unconfirmed ancestors which are replaceable). - "estimate_mode": "str", (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive): +estimate_mode (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive): "unset" "economical" "conservative" - } Result: { (json object) ``` </p> </details> **Review suggestion:** To understand this PR, it is probably easiest to review the commits in reverse order because the last commit shows the external API changes, the middle commit shows the internal API changes, and the first commit contains the low-level implementation. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 2cd28e9fef5dd743bcd70025196ee311fcfdcae4 Tree-SHA512: 50f6e78fa622826dab3f810400d8c1a03a98a090b1f2fea79729c58ad8cff955554bd44c2a5975f62a526b900dda68981862fd7d7d05c17f94f5b5d847317436
2023-05-30Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26261: p2p: cleanup `LookupIntern`, `Lookup` and ↵Andrew Chow
`LookupHost` 5c832c3820253affc65c0ed490e26e5b0a4d5c9b p2p, refactor: return `std::optional<CNetAddr>` in `LookupHost` (brunoerg) 34bcdfc6a65de906c65edccdd96fe15219081cd2 p2p, refactor: return vector/optional<CService> in `Lookup` (brunoerg) 7799eb125b7a1146f8251be5d26df574236212a9 p2p, refactor: return `std::vector<CNetAddr>` in `LookupHost` (brunoerg) 5c1774a563dcc237a88df69569cd94fe81e908f7 p2p, refactor: return `std::vector<CNetAddr>` in `LookupIntern` (brunoerg) Pull request description: Continuation of #26078. To improve readability instead of returning a bool and passing stuff by reference, this PR changes: - `LookupHost` to return `std::vector<CNetAddr>` - `LookupHost` to return `std::optional<CNetAddr>` - `Lookup` to return `std::vector<CService>` - `Lookup` to return `std::optional<CService>`. - `LookupIntern` to return `std::vector<CNetAddr>` As discussed in #26078, it would be better to avoid using `optional` in some cases, but for specific `Lookup` and `LookupHost` functions it's necessary to use `optional` to verify if they were able to catch some data from their overloaded function. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 5c832c3820253affc65c0ed490e26e5b0a4d5c9b stickies-v: re-ACK 5c832c3820253affc65c0ed490e26e5b0a4d5c9b - just addressing two nits, no other changes theStack: re-ACK 5c832c3820253affc65c0ed490e26e5b0a4d5c9b Tree-SHA512: ea346fdc54463999646269bd600cd4a1590ef958001d2f0fc2be608ca51e1b4365efccca76dd4972b023e12fcc6e67d226608b0df7beb901bdeadd19948df840
2023-05-30Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27636: kernel: Remove util/system from kernel library, ↵fanquake
interface_ui from validation. 7d3b35004b039f2bd606bb46a540de7babdbc41e refactor: Move system from util to common library (TheCharlatan) 7eee356c0a7fefd70c8de21689efa335f52a69ba refactor: Split util::AnyPtr into its own file (TheCharlatan) 44de325d95447498036479c3112ba741caf45bf6 refactor: Split util::insert into its own file (TheCharlatan) 9ec5da36b62276ae22e348f26f88aaf646357d6d refactor: Move ScheduleBatchPriority to its own file (TheCharlatan) f871c69191dfe1331861ebcdbadb6bd47e45c8b1 kernel: Add warning method to notifications (TheCharlatan) 4452707edec91c7d7991f486dd41ef3edb4f7fbf kernel: Add progress method to notifications (TheCharlatan) 84d71457e7250ab25c0a11d1ad1c7657197ffd90 kernel: Add headerTip method to notifications (TheCharlatan) 447761c8228d58f948aae7e73ed079c028cacb97 kernel: Add notification interface (TheCharlatan) Pull request description: This pull request is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18 and more specifically its "Step 2: Decouple most non-consensus code from libbitcoinkernel". --- It removes the kernel library's dependency on `util/system` and `interface_ui`. `util/system` contains networking and shell-related code that should not be part of the kernel library. The following pull requests prepared `util/system` for this final step: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27419 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27254 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27238. `interface_ui` defines functions for a more general node interface and has a dependency on `boost/signals2`. After applying the patches from this pull request, the kernel's reliance on boost is down to `boost::multiindex`. The approach implemented here introduces some indirection, which makes the code a bit harder to read. Any suggestions for improving or reworking this pull request to make it more concise, or even reworking it into a more proper interface, are appreciated. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: re-ACK 7d3b35004b039f2bd606bb46a540de7babdbc41e (no change) 🎋 stickies-v: Code Review ACK 7d3b35004b039f2bd606bb46a540de7babdbc41e hebasto: re-ACK 7d3b35004b039f2bd606bb46a540de7babdbc41e, only last two commits dropped since my [recent](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27636#pullrequestreview-1435394620) review. Tree-SHA512: c8cfc698dc9d78e20191c444708f2d957501229abe95e5806106d1126fb9c5fbcee686fb55645658c0107ce71f10646f37a2fdf7fde16bbf22cbf1ac885dd08d
2023-05-26p2p, refactor: return `std::optional<CNetAddr>` in `LookupHost`brunoerg
2023-05-24Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27626: Parallel compact block downloads, take 3fanquake
d7f359b35e8b1e9acc4d397de262cd9ba9bbcb83 Add tests for parallel compact block downloads (Greg Sanders) 03423f8bd12b95a06a4a9d8377e781625dd38aae Support up to 3 parallel compact block txn fetchings (Greg Sanders) 13f9b20b4cb2f3f26e81184a77e9cf1f626d4f57 Only request full blocks from the peer we thought had the block in-flight (Greg Sanders) cce96182ba2457335868c65dc16b081c3dee32ee Convert mapBlocksInFlight to a multimap (Greg Sanders) a90595478dcf4e443cd15bbb822d485dc42bdb18 Remove nBlocksInFlight (Greg Sanders) 86cff8bf18f2c6344a25ad8b81cf366201a73c36 alias BlockDownloadMap for mapBlocksInFlight (Greg Sanders) Pull request description: This is an attempt at mitigating https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25258 , which is a revival of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10984, which is a revival of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9447. This PR attempts to mitigate a single case, where high bandwidth peers can bail us out of a flakey peer not completing blocks for us. We allow up to 2 additional getblocktxns requests per unique block. This would hopefully allow the chance for an honest high bandwidth peer to hand us the transactions even if the first in flight peer stalls out. In contrast to previous effort: 1) it will not help if subsequent peers send block headers only, so only high-bandwidth peers this time. See: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10984/files#diff-6875de769e90cec84d2e8a9c1b962cdbcda44d870d42e4215827e599e11e90e3R1411 2) `MAX_GETBLOCKTXN_TXN_AFTER_FIRST_IN_FLIGHT` is removed, in favor of aiding recovery during turbulent mempools 3) We require one of the 3 block fetching slots to be an outbound peer. This can be the original offering peer, or subsequent compact blocks given by high bandwidth peers. ACKs for top commit: sdaftuar: ACK d7f359b35e8b1e9acc4d397de262cd9ba9bbcb83 mzumsande: Code Review ACK d7f359b35e8b1e9acc4d397de262cd9ba9bbcb83 Tree-SHA512: 54980eac179e30f12a0bd49df147b2c3d63cd8f9401abb23c7baf02f76eeb59f2cfaaa155227990d0d39384de9fa38663f88774e891600a3837ae927f04f0db3
2023-05-23Support up to 3 parallel compact block txn fetchingsGreg Sanders
A single outbound slot is required, so if the first two slots are taken by inbound in-flights, the node will reject additional unless they are coming from outbound. This means in the case where a fast sybil peer is attempting to stall out a node, a single high bandwidth outbound peer can mitigate the attack.
2023-05-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25796: rpc: add `descriptorprocesspsbt` rpcAndrew Chow
1bce12acd3e271a7c88d9400b4e3a5645bc8a911 test: add test for `descriptorprocesspsbt` RPC (ishaanam) fb2a3a70e860aa87fb7a21f6554ed9f3ce901e2d rpc: add descriptorprocesspsbt rpc (ishaanam) Pull request description: This PR implements an RPC called `descriptorprocesspsbt`. This RPC is based off of `walletprocesspsbt`, but instead of interacting with the wallet to update, sign and finalize a psbt, it instead accepts an array of output descriptors and uses that information along with information from the mempool, txindex, and the utxo set to do so. `utxoupdatepsbt` also updates a psbt in this manner, but doesn't sign or finalize it. Because of this overlap, a helper function that is added in this PR is called by both `utxoupdatepsbt` and `descriptorprocesspsbt`. Whether or not the helper function signs a psbt is dictated by if the HidingSigningProvider passed to it contains any private information. There is also a test added in this PR for this new RPC that uses p2wsh, p2wpkh, and legacy outputs. Edit: see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25796#issuecomment-1228830963 ACKs for top commit: achow101: re-ACK 1bce12acd3e271a7c88d9400b4e3a5645bc8a911 instagibbs: reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25796/commits/1bce12acd3e271a7c88d9400b4e3a5645bc8a911 Tree-SHA512: e1d0334739943e71f2ee68b4db7637ebe725da62e7aa4be071f71c7196d2a5970a31ece96d91e372d34454cde8509e95ab0eebd2c8edb94f7d5a781a84f8fc5d
2023-05-20refactor: Move system from util to common libraryTheCharlatan
Since the kernel library no longer depends on the system file, move it to the common library instead in accordance to the diagram in doc/design/libraries.md.
2023-05-20refactor: Split util::AnyPtr into its own fileTheCharlatan
2023-05-20kernel: Add progress method to notificationsTheCharlatan
This commit is part of the libbitcoinkernel project and seeks to remove the ChainstateManager's and, more generally, the kernel library's dependency on interface_ui with options methods in this and the following few commits. By removing interface_ui from the kernel library, its dependency on boost is reduced to just boost::multi_index.
2023-05-17doc: remove mention of glibc 2.10+fanquake
We already require glibc 2.27+, so mentioning a much older version here is redundant.
2023-05-11Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27125: refactor, kernel: Decouple ArgsManager from ↵fanquake
blockstorage 5ff63a09a9edd1204b2cc56cf6f48a44adab7bb3 refactor, blockstorage: Replace stopafterblockimport arg (TheCharlatan) 18e5ba7c8002bcd473ee29ce4b5bfc56df6142a4 refactor, blockstorage: Replace blocksdir arg (TheCharlatan) 02a0899527ba3d31329e56c791c9dbf36075bb84 refactor, BlockManager: Replace fastprune from arg with options (TheCharlatan) a498d699e3fdac5bfdb33020a1fd6c4a79989752 refactor/iwyu: Complete includes for blockmanager_args (TheCharlatan) f0bb1021f0d60f5f19176e67a66fcf7c325f88d1 refactor: Move functions to BlockManager methods (TheCharlatan) cfbb2124939822e95265a39242ffca3d86bac6e8 zmq: Pass lambda to zmq's ZMQPublishRawBlockNotifier (TheCharlatan) 8ed4ff8e05d61a8e954d72cebdc2e1d1ab24fb84 refactor: Declare g_zmq_notification_interface as unique_ptr (TheCharlatan) Pull request description: The libbitcoin_kernel library should not rely on the `ArgsManager`, but rather use option structs that can be passed to the various classes it uses. This PR removes reliance on the `ArgsManager` from the `blockstorage.*` files. Like similar prior work, it uses the options struct in the `BlockManager` that can be populated with `ArgsManager` values. Some related prior work: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26889 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25862 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25527 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25487 Related PR removing blockstorage globals: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25781 ACKs for top commit: ryanofsky: Code review ACK 5ff63a09a9edd1204b2cc56cf6f48a44adab7bb3. Since last ACK just added std::move and fixed commit title. Sorry for the noise! mzumsande: Code Review ACK 5ff63a09a9edd1204b2cc56cf6f48a44adab7bb3 Tree-SHA512: 4bde8fd140a40b97eca923e9016d85dcea6fad6fd199731f158376294af59c3e8b163a0725aa47b4be3519b61828044e0a042deea005e0c28de21d8b6c3e1ea7
2023-05-10[rpc] add getprioritisedtransactionsglozow
This allows the user to see prioritisation for not-in-mempool transactions.
2023-05-10refactor: Move functions to BlockManager methodsTheCharlatan
This is a commit in preparation for the next few commits. The functions are moved to methods to avoid their re-declaration for the purpose of passing in BlockManager options. The functions that were now moved into the BlockManager should no longer use the params as an argument, but instead use the member variable. In the moved ReadBlockFromDisk and UndoReadFromDisk, change the function signature to accept a reference to a CBlockIndex instead of a raw pointer. The pointer is expected to be non-null, so reflect that in the type. To allow for the move of functions to BlockManager methods all call sites require an instantiated BlockManager, or a callback to one.
2023-05-09Fix clang-tidy performance-unnecessary-copy-initialization warningsMarcoFalke
2023-05-09scripted-diff: Use UniValue::find_value methodMarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed --regexp-extended -i 's/find_value\(([^ ,]+), /\1.find_value(/g' $(git grep -l find_value) -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2023-05-09Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27491: refactor: Move chain constants to the util libraryfanquake
d168458d1ff987e0d741c75ac1d4b63ae0cfb7e7 scripted-diff: Remove unused chainparamsbase includes (TheCharlatan) e9ee8aaf3acdf6dce2b339916d4c602484570050 Add missing definitions in prep for scripted diff (TheCharlatan) ba8fc7d788932b25864fb260ca14983aa2398c23 refactor: Replace string chain name constants with ChainTypes (TheCharlatan) 401453df419af35957ec711423ac3d93ad512fe8 refactor: Introduce ChainType getters for ArgsManager (TheCharlatan) bfc21c31b2186f7d30fc9a9ca7d6887ab61c6fb9 refactor: Create chaintype files (TheCharlatan) Pull request description: This pull request is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24303 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18 and more specifically its "Step 2: Decouple most non-consensus code from libbitcoinkernel". It is also a follow up to #26177. It replaces pull request https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27294, which just moved the constants to a new file, but did not re-declare them as enums. The code move of the chain name constants out of the `chainparamsbase` to their own separate header allows the kernel `chainparams` to no longer include `chainparamsbase`. The `chainparamsbase` contain references to the `ArgsManager` and networking related options that should not belong to the kernel library. Besides this move, the constants are re-declared as enums with helper functions facilitating string conversions. ACKs for top commit: ryanofsky: Code review ACK d168458d1ff987e0d741c75ac1d4b63ae0cfb7e7. Just suggested changes since last review. Tree-SHA512: ac2fbe5cbbab4f52eae1e30af1f16700b6589eb4764c328a151a712adfc37f326cc94a65c385534c57d4bc92cc1a13bf1777d92bc924a20dbb30440e7380b316
2023-05-09scripted-diff: Remove unused chainparamsbase includesTheCharlatan
This is a follow-up to previous commits moving the chain constants out of chainparamsbase. The script removes the chainparamsbase header in all files where it is included, but not used. This is done by filtering against all defined symbols of the header as well as its respective .cpp file. The kernel chainparams now no longer relies on chainparamsbase. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i '/#include <chainparamsbase.h>/d' $( git grep -l 'chainparamsbase.h' | xargs grep -L 'CBaseChainParams\|CreateBaseChainParams\|SetupChainParamsBaseOptions\|BaseParams\|SelectBaseParams\|chainparamsbase.cpp' ) -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2023-05-09refactor: Replace string chain name constants with ChainTypesTheCharlatan
This commit effectively moves the definition of these constants out of the chainparamsbase to their own file. Using the ChainType enums provides better type safety compared to passing around strings. The commit is part of an ongoing effort to decouple the libbitcoinkernel library from the ArgsManager and other functionality that should not be part of the kernel library.
2023-05-08refactor: Remove unused GetTimeMillisMarcoFalke
The function is unused, not type-safe, and does not denote the underlying clock type. So remove it.
2023-05-04rpc: add descriptorprocesspsbt rpcishaanam
This RPC can be the Updater, Signer, and optionally the Input Finalizer for a psbt, and has no interaction with the Bitcoin Core wallet.
2023-05-03rpc: Add check for unintended option/parameter name clashesRyan Ofsky
Also add flag to allow RPC methods that intendionally accept options and parameters with the same name bypass the check. Check and flag were suggested by ajtowns https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26485#issuecomment-1507916357 Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
2023-05-03RPC: Allow RPC methods accepting options to take named parametersRyan Ofsky
Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <github@achow101.com>
2023-05-03RPC: Add add OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS typeRyan Ofsky
OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type works the same as OBJ type except it registers the object keys to be accepted as top-level named-only RPC parameters. Generated documentation also lists the object keys seperately in a new "Named arguments" section of help text. Named-only RPC parameters have the same semantics as python keyword-only arguments (https://peps.python.org/pep-3102/). They are always required to be passed by name, so they don't affect interpretation of positional arguments, and aren't affected when positional arguments are added or removed. The new OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type is used in the next commit to make it easier to pass options values to various RPC methods. Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <github@achow101.com>
2023-05-01Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26780: rpc: simplify scan blocksAndrew Chow
b922f6b5262884f42d7483f1e9af35650bdb53a7 rpc: scanblocks, add "completed" flag to the result obj (furszy) ce50acc54fa313a92d48ed03e46ce8aabcf267e5 rpc: scanblocks, do not traverse the whole chain block by block (furszy) Pull request description: Coming from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23549#pullrequestreview-1105712566 The current `scanblocks` flow walks-through every block in the active chain until hits the chain tip or processes 10k blocks, then calls `lookupFilterRange` function to obtain all filters from that particular range. This is only done to obtain the heights range to look up the block filters. Which is unneeded. As `scanblocks` only lookup block filters in the active chain, we can directly calculate the lookup range heights, by using the chain tip, without requiring to traverse the chain block by block. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK b922f6b5262884f42d7483f1e9af35650bdb53a7 TheCharlatan: ACK b922f6b5262884f42d7483f1e9af35650bdb53a7 Tree-SHA512: 0587e6d9cf87a59184adb2dbc26a4e2bce3a16233594c6c330f69feb49bf7dc63fdacf44fc20308e93441159ebc604c63eb7de19204d3e745a2ff16004892b45
2023-04-30rpc: scanblocks, add "completed" flag to the result objfurszy
To tell the user whether the process was aborted or not. Plus, as the process can be aborted prior to the end range, have also changed the "to_height" result value to return the last scanned block instead of the end range block.
2023-04-30rpc: scanblocks, do not traverse the whole chain block by blockfurszy
The current flow walks-through every block in the active chain until hits the chain tip or processes 10k blocks, then calls `lookupFilterRange()` to obtain all the filters from that particular range. This is only done to obtain the heights range to look up the block filters. Which is unneeded. As `scanblocks` only lookup block filters in the active chain, we can directly calculate the lookup range heights, by using the chain tip, without requiring to traverse the chain block by block.
2023-04-21Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25939: rpc: In `utxoupdatepsbt` also look for the tx ↵Andrew Chow
in the txindex 6e9f8bb050785dbc754b6bb493aad9139908ef98 rpc, tests: in `utxoupdatepsbt` also look for the transaction in the txindex (ishaanam) a5b4883fb43d01bfef1244df62c64bf8691ca63a rpc: extract psbt updating logic into ProcessPSBT (ishaanam) Pull request description: Previously the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC, added in #13932, only updated the inputs spending segwit outputs with the `witness_utxo`, because the full transaction is needed for legacy inputs. Before this RPC looked for just the utxos in the utxo set and the mempool. This PR makes it so that if the user has txindex enabled, then the full transaction is looked for there for all inputs. If it is not found in the txindex or txindex isn't enabled, then the mempool is checked for the full transaction. If the transaction an input is spending from is still not found at that point, then the utxo set is searched and the inputs spending segwit outputs are updated with just the utxo. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 6e9f8bb050785dbc754b6bb493aad9139908ef98 Xekyo: ACK 6e9f8bb050785dbc754b6bb493aad9139908ef98 Tree-SHA512: 078db3c37a1ecd5816d80a42e8bd1341e416d661f508fa5fce0f4e1249fefd7b92a0d45f44957781cb69d0953145ef096ecdd4545ada39062be27742402dac6f
2023-04-21Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27419: move-only: Extract common/args from util/systemfanquake
be55f545d53d44fdcf2d8ae802e9eae551d120c6 move-only: Extract common/args and common/config.cpp from util/system (TheCharlatan) Pull request description: This pull request is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24303 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18 and more specifically its "Step 2: Decouple most non-consensus code from libbitcoinkernel". It is part of a series of patches splitting up the `util/system` files. Its preceding pull request is https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27254. The pull request contains an extraction of ArgsManager related functions from util/system into their own common/ file. The background of this commit is an ongoing effort to decouple the libbitcoinkernel library from the ArgsManager. The ArgsManager belongs into the common library, since the kernel library should not depend on it. See [doc/design/libraries.md](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/design/libraries.md) for more information on this rationale. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: re-ACK be55f545d53d44fdcf2d8ae802e9eae551d120c6 🚲 ryanofsky: Code review ACK be55f545d53d44fdcf2d8ae802e9eae551d120c6. Just small cleanups since the last review. hebasto: ACK be55f545d53d44fdcf2d8ae802e9eae551d120c6, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged. Tree-SHA512: 90eb03334af0155b823030b4f2ecf286d35058d700ee2ddbbaa445be19e31eb0fe982656f35bd14ecee3ad2c3d0db3746855cb8f3777eff7253713e42873e111
2023-04-19move-only: Extract common/args and common/config.cpp from util/systemTheCharlatan
This is an extraction of ArgsManager related functions from util/system into their own common file. Config file related functions are moved to common/config.cpp. The background of this commit is an ongoing effort to decouple the libbitcoinkernel library from the ArgsManager. The ArgsManager belongs into the common library, since the kernel library should not depend on it. See doc/design/libraries.md for more information on this rationale.
2023-04-12Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27279: Add "warnings", deprecate "warning" in ↵Andrew Chow
{create,load,unload,restore}wallet 7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55 test: fix importmulti/importdescriptors assertion (Jon Atack) 19d888ce407f44d90785c456a1a3e2a6870e9245 rpc: move WALLET_FLAG_CAVEATS to the compilation unit of its caller (Jon Atack) 01df011ca2bf46ee4c988b03a130eea6df692325 doc: release note for wallet RPCs "warning" field deprecation (Jon Atack) 9ea8b3739a863b0ad87593639476b3cd712ff0dc test: createwallet "warning" field deprecation test (Jon Atack) 645d7f75ac1b40e4ea88119b3711f89943d35d6c rpc: deprecate "warning" field in {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack) 2f4a926e95e0379397859c3ba1b5711be5f09925 test: add test coverage for "warnings" field in createwallet (Jon Atack) 4a1e479ca612056761e6247dd5b715dcd6824413 rpc: add "warnings" field to RPCs {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack) 079d8cdda8eeebe199fb6592fca2630c37662731 rpc: extract wallet "warnings" fields to a util helper (Jon Atack) f73782a9032a462a71569e9424db9bf9eeababf3 doc: fix/improve warning helps in {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack) Pull request description: Based on discussion and concept ACKed in #27138, add a `warnings` field to RPCs createwallet, loadwallet, unloadwallet, and restorewallet as a JSON array of strings to replace the `warning` string field in these 4 RPCs. The idea is to more gracefully handle multiple warning messages and for consistency with other wallet RPCs. Then, deprecate the latter fields, which represent all the remaining RPC `warning` fields. The first commit https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27279/commits/f73782a9032a462a71569e9424db9bf9eeababf3 implements https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27138#issuecomment-1474789198 as an alternative to #27138. One of those two could potentially be backported to our currently supported releases. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55 1440000bytes: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27279/commits/7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55 vasild: ACK 7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55 pinheadmz: re-ACK 7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55 Tree-SHA512: 314e0a4c41fa383d95e2817bfacf359d449e460529d235c3eb902851e2f4eacbabe646d9a5a4beabc4964cdfabf6397ed8301366a58d344a2f787f83b75e9d64
2023-04-10rpc: add "warnings" field to RPCs {create,load,unload,restore}walletJon Atack
This new "warnings" field is a JSON array of strings intended to replace the "warning" string field in these four RPCs, to better handle returning multiple warning messages and for consistency with other wallet RPCs.
2023-04-10rpc: extract wallet "warnings" fields to a util helperJon Atack
2023-04-03Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27254: refactor: Extract util/fs from util/systemfanquake
00e9b97f37e0bdf4c647236838c10b68b7ad5be3 refactor: Move fs.* to util/fs.* (TheCharlatan) 106b46d9d25b5228ef009fbbe6f9a7ae35090d15 Add missing fs.h includes (TheCharlatan) b202b3dd6393b415fa68e18dc49c9431dc6b58b2 Add missing cstddef include in assumptions.h (TheCharlatan) 18fb36367a28819bd5ab402344802796a1248979 refactor: Extract util/fs_helpers from util/system (Ben Woosley) Pull request description: This pull request is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24303 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18 and more specifically its "Step 2: Decouple most non-consensus code from libbitcoinkernel". This commit was originally authored by empact and is taken from its parent PR #25152. #### Context There is an ongoing effort to decouple the `ArgsManager` used for command line parsing user-provided arguments from the libbitcoinkernel library (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25290, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25487, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25527, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25862, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26177, and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27125). The `ArgsManager` is defined in `system.h`. A similar pull request extracting functionality from `system.h` has been merged in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27238. #### Changes Next to providing better code organization, this PR removes some reliance of the tree of libbitcoinkernel header includes on `system.h` (and thus the `ArgsManager` definition) by moving filesystem related functions out of the `system.*` files. There is already a pair of `fs.h` / `fs.cpp` in the top-level `src/` directory. They were not combined with the files introduced here, to keep the patch cleaner and more importantly because they are often included without the utility functions. The new files are therefore named `fs_helpers` and the existing `fs` files are moved into the util directory. Further commits splitting more functionality out of `system.h` are still in #25152 and will be submitted in separate PRs once this PR has been processed. ACKs for top commit: hebasto: ACK 00e9b97f37e0bdf4c647236838c10b68b7ad5be3 Tree-SHA512: 31422f148d14ba3c843b99b1550a6fd77c77f350905ca324f93d4f97b652246bc58fa9696c64d1201979cf88733e40be02d262739bb7d417cf22bf506fdb7666
2023-03-26clang-tidy: Add `performance-inefficient-vector-operation` checkHennadii Stepanov
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/performance/inefficient-vector-operation.html
2023-03-26clang-tidy: Add `performance-faster-string-find` checkHennadii Stepanov
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/performance/faster-string-find.html
2023-03-23refactor: rpc: hide and rename ParseNonRFCJSONValue()stickies-v
As per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26506#pullrequestreview-1211984059, this function is no longer necessary and we can use UniValue::read() directly. To avoid code duplication, we keep the function to throw on invalid input data but rename it to Parse() and remove it from the header.
2023-03-23Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#18933: rpc: Add submit option to generateblockfanquake
fa18504d5767a40dc9827fb081633219bf251001 rpc: Add submit option to generateblock (MarcoFalke) fab9a08e145dc5a1d9576bf062473f1095b56a16 refactor: Replace block_hash with block_out (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: When submit is turned off, a block can be generated and returned as hex, to be used for further tests. For example, it can be submitted on a different node, on a different interface (like p2p), or just never submitted and be used for other testing purposes. ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: ACK fa18504d5767a40dc9827fb081633219bf251001 TheCharlatan: tACK fa18504d5767a40dc9827fb081633219bf251001 Tree-SHA512: 1b2ab6b71bb7e155c6482d75f5373f4e77de6446cb16bc2dfd19e7a4075b3a6ad87d7ad7a049a9eed934cb71574acfd27202f54c8bb3b03fac869f2e95db7ee5
2023-03-23refactor: Move fs.* to util/fs.*TheCharlatan
The fs.* files are already part of the libbitcoin_util library. With the introduction of the fs_helpers.* it makes sense to move fs.* into the util/ directory as well.
2023-03-23refactor: Extract util/fs_helpers from util/systemBen Woosley
This is an extraction of filesystem related functions from util/system into their own utility file. The background of this commit is an ongoing effort to decouple the libbitcoinkernel library from the ArgsManager defined in system.h. Moving these functions out of system.h allows including them from a separate source file without including the ArgsManager definitions from system.h.
2023-03-18rpc, tests: in `utxoupdatepsbt` also look for the transaction in the txindexishaanam
Previously only the segwit utxos being spent by the psbt were looked for and added to the psbt. Now, the full transaction corresponding to each of these utxos (legacy and segwit) is looked for in the txindex and mempool and added to the psbt. If txindex is disabled and the transaction is not in the mempool, then we fall back to getting just the utxo (if segwit) from the utxo set.
2023-03-15refactor: Add and use PRUNE_TARGET_MANUAL constexprMarcoFalke
2023-03-10Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23813: Add test and docs for getblockfrompeer with pruningfanquake
fe329dc936d1e02da406345e4223e11d1fa6fb38 test: Add test for getblockfrompeer on pruned nodes (Fabian Jahr) cd761e6b2cfade038b8018886c334bf25a0bcbcf rpc: Add note on guarantees to getblockfrompeer (Fabian Jahr) Pull request description: These are additions to `getblockfrompeer` that I already [suggested on the original PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20295#pullrequestreview-817157738). The two commits do the following: 1. Add a test for `getblockfrompeer` usage on pruned nodes. This is important because many use-cases for `getblockfrompeer` are in a context of a pruned node. 2. Add some information on how long the users of pruned nodes can expect the block to be available after they have used the RPC. I think the behavior is not very intuitive for users and I would not be surprised if users expect the block to be available indefinitely. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-utACK fe329dc936d1e02da406345e4223e11d1fa6fb38 MarcoFalke: review ACK fe329dc936d1e02da406345e4223e11d1fa6fb38 🍉 stratospher: ACK fe329dc. brunoerg: re-ACK fe329dc936d1e02da406345e4223e11d1fa6fb38 Tree-SHA512: a686bd8955d9c3baf365db384e497d6ee1aa9ce2fdb0733fe6150f7e3d94bae19d55bc1b347f1c9f619e749e18b41a52b9f8c0aa2042dd311a968a4b5d251fac
2023-03-10rpc: Add submit option to generateblockMarcoFalke
2023-03-10refactor: Replace block_hash with block_outMarcoFalke