| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
41dca087b73a3627107603694f5a982ea2a53189 [trivial] Extract connection type doc into file where it is used. (Amiti Uttarwar)
3069b56a456d98fca7c4a4ccd329581bd1f0b853 [doc] Improve help for getpeerinfo connection_type field. (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
two commits addressing small followups from #19725
* first commit adds a clarification in the release notes that this field shouldn't be expected to be stable (suggested by sdaftuar in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19725#issuecomment-697421878)
* second commit moves the `CONNECTION_TYPE_DOC` object out of the header file to reduce the size of the binary (suggested by MarcoFalke in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19725#discussion_r495467895, he tested and found a decrease of 10kB)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 41dca087b73a3627107603694f5a982ea2a53189
laanwj:
Code review ACK 41dca087b73a3627107603694f5a982ea2a53189
Tree-SHA512: a555df978b4341fbe05deeb40a8a655f0d3c5c1c0adcc1737fd2cf61b204a5a24a301ca0c2b5a3616554d4abf8c57074d22dbda5a50d8450bc22c57679424985
|
|
simplify/improve -netinfo
6272604bef3b409455b010d134b4b62c8f6ff49f refactor: enable -netinfo to add future networks (i2p, cjdns) (Jon Atack)
82fd40216c70037480150d2b62e2b58c57784546 refactor: promote some -netinfo localvars to class members (Jon Atack)
5133fab37e8679e1d0d08ead4f5cccf4979dc15b cli: simplify -netinfo using getpeerinfo network field (Jon Atack)
4938a109adf13f2c60a50f08d4cc9ddb8d7ded96 rpc, test: expose CNodeStats network in RPC getpeerinfo (Jon Atack)
6df7882029854f0427d84b22081018ae77e27e66 net: add peer network to CNodeStats (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- builds on #19991 and #19998
- exposes peer networks via a new getpeerinfo `network` field ("ipv4", "ipv6", or "onion"), and adds functional tests
- updates -netinfo to use getpeerinfo `network` rather than detecting the peer networks client-side
- refactors -netinfo to easily add future networks
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 6272604bef3b409455b010d134b4b62c8f6ff49f
Tree-SHA512: 28883487585135ceaaf84ce09131f2336e3193407f2e3df0960e3f4ac340f500ab94ffecb9d06a4c49bc05e3cca4f914ea4379860bea0bd5df2f834f74616015
|
|
"permissions")
5b57dc5458800e56b4dddfeb32a1813804a62b0f RPC: getpeerinfo: Wrap long help line for bytesrecv_per_msg (Luke Dashjr)
d681a28219d3876a2b6e3cd2fb0d92963674903e RPC: getpeerinfo: Deprecate "whitelisted" field (replaced by "permissions") (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
If we were going to continue support for "whitelisted", we should have probably made it true if any permission flag was set, rather than only if "default permissions" were used.
This corrects the description, and deprecates it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 5b57dc5458800e56b4dddfeb32a1813804a62b0f
Tree-SHA512: a2e2137f8be8110357c1b2fef2c923fa8c7c4a49b0b2b3a2d78aedf12f8ed5cc7e140018a21b37e6ec7770ed4007542aeef7ad4558973901b107e8e0f81d6003
|
|
0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6 tests: dumping and minimizing of script assets data (Pieter Wuille)
4567ba034c5ae6e6cc161360f7425c9e844738f0 tests: add generic qa-asset-based script verification unit test (Pieter Wuille)
f06e6d03452cf5e0b1a0863afb08c9e6d3ef452e tests: functional tests for Schnorr/Taproot/Tapscript (Pieter Wuille)
3c226639eb134314a0640d34e4ccb6148dbde22f tests: add BIP340 Schnorr signature support to test framework (Pieter Wuille)
206fb180ec6ee5f916afc6f574000d716daf79b7 --- [TAPROOT] Tests --- (Pieter Wuille)
d7ff237f2996a4c11fdf9399187c2d2b26bf9809 Activate Taproot/Tapscript on regtest (BIP 341, BIP 342) (Pieter Wuille)
e9a021d7e6a454d610a45cb9b3995f0d96a5fbb6 Make Taproot spends standard + policy limits (Pieter Wuille)
865d2c37e2e44678498b7f425b65e01b1e231cde --- [TAPROOT] Regtest activation and policy --- (Pieter Wuille)
72422ce396b8eba7b1a72c171c2f07dae691d1b5 Implement Tapscript script validation rules (BIP 342) (Johnson Lau)
330de894a9a48515d9a473448b6c67adc3d188be Use ScriptExecutionData to pass through annex hash (Pieter Wuille)
8bbed4b7acf4c76eaea8c0e10f3cbf6ba4e53809 Implement Taproot validation (BIP 341) (Pieter Wuille)
0664f5fe1f77f08d235aa3750b59428257b0b91d Support for Schnorr signatures and integration in SignatureCheckers (BIP 340) (Pieter Wuille)
5de246ca8159dcffaa4c136a60c8bfed2028e2ee Implement Taproot signature hashing (BIP 341) (Johnson Lau)
9eb590894f15ff40806039bfd32972fbc260e30d Add TaggedHash function (BIP 340) (Pieter Wuille)
450d2b23710ad296eede81339195376021ab5500 --- [TAPROOT] BIP340/341/342 consensus rules --- (Pieter Wuille)
5d62e3a68b6ea9bb03556ee1fbf5678f20be01a2 refactor: keep spent outputs in PrecomputedTransactionData (Pieter Wuille)
8bd2b4e78452ff69c08c37acf164a6b80e503f13 refactor: rename scriptPubKey in VerifyWitnessProgram to exec_script (Pieter Wuille)
107b57df9fa8b2d625d2b342dc77722282a6ae4c scripted-diff: put ECDSA in name of signature functions (Pieter Wuille)
f8c099e2207c90d758e7a659d6a55fa7ccb7ceaa --- [TAPROOT] Refactors --- (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is an implementation of the Schnorr/taproot consensus rules proposed by BIPs [340](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki), [341](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki), and [342](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki).
See the list of commits [below](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953#issuecomment-691815830). No signing or wallet support of any kind is included, as testing is done entirely through the Python test framework.
This is a successor to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17977 (see discussion following [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17977#issuecomment-682285983)), and will have further changes squashed/rebased. The history of this PR can be found in #19997.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953/commits/0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6
benthecarman:
reACK 0e2a5e4
kallewoof:
reACK 0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6
jonasnick:
ACK 0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6 almost only looked at bip340/libsecp related code
jonatack:
ACK 0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6 modulo the last four commits (tests) that I plan to finish reviewing tomorrow
fjahr:
reACK 0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6
achow101:
ACK 0e2a5e448f426219a6464b9aaadcc715534114e6
Tree-SHA512: 1b00314450a2938a22bccbb4e177230cf08bd365d72055f9d526891f334b364c997e260c10bc19ca78440b6767712c9feea7faad9a1045dd51a5b96f7ca8146e
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Define a versionbits-based activation for the new consensus rules on regtest.
No activation or activation mechanism is defined for testnet or mainnet.
|
|
This slightly reduces the size of the binary.
|
|
|
|
clients
b048b275d9711f70847afaea5450f17a0f7e673a [validation] Remove absurdfee from accepttomempool (John Newbery)
932564b9cfda8446a957649c2316a52e868ad5d4 scripted-diff: update max-fee-exceeded error message to include RPC (gzhao408)
8f1290c60159a3171c27250bc95687548c5c1b84 [rpc/node] check for high fee before ATMP in clients (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
Picked up from #15810. Add separate fee-checking logic for clients that need to enforce max fee rates, then remove the `absurdFee` logic from ATMP.
ATMP's `nAbsurdFee` argument is used to enforce user-specific behavior (it is not policy since it isn't applied consistently: it is only ever used in RPC and wallet, and set to 0 everywhere else internally). It should be removed from `AcceptToMemoryPool` because (1) validation results/mempool behavior should not be user-specific and (2) enforcing a max fee rate should be the responsibility of the client instead of the mempool.
Note: this PR does not intend to _remove_ protection from high fees, just re-delegate the responsibility to clients.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK b048b275d9711f70847afaea5450f17a0f7e673a
LarryRuane:
re-ACK b048b275d9711f70847afaea5450f17a0f7e673a
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK b048b275d9 , only change is squashing one commit 🏦
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19339/commits/b048b275d9711f70847afaea5450f17a0f7e673a
Tree-SHA512: 57c17ba16d230a4cae2896dd6a64c924f307757824e35784bf96da7b10aff2d8ea910710edf35e981035623a155f8766209a92a0fdb856549fde78bc3eaae4d2
|
|
Mempool behavior should not be user-specific.
Checking that txfee is acceptable should be
the responsibility of the wallet or client, not
the mempool.
|
|
Check absurd fee in BroadcastTransaction and RPC,
return TransactionError::MAX_FEE_EXCEEDED instead
of TxValidationResult::TX_NOT_STANDARD because this
is client preference, not a node-wide policy.
|
|
1885ad35467f201f2a210057797aae8a450e7cdf RPC: remove duplicate line in getblock help (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Line simply seems duplicated in error.
Testing instructions:
Run `src/bitcoin-cli help getblock` on master branch to reproduce. Then build this PR and compare its results.
ACKs for top commit:
dhruv:
tACK `1885ad3`
kristapsk:
ACK 1885ad35467f201f2a210057797aae8a450e7cdf
Emzy:
tACK 1885ad35467f201f2a210057797aae8a450e7cdf
Tree-SHA512: 870c035cb553b0e1d5ef72e64231ef277e0392efe94bc6ecf47129023bd94a6d5a276f46529807f68a1db55c7baa94d9119c7264d9947bc4e5dd9dcefd1b13e7
|
|
f471a3be00c2b6433b8c258b716982c0539da13f scripted diff: Improve invalid vout value rpc error message (Nima Yazdanmehr)
Pull request description:
Since the `vout` value can start at `0`, the error message for *negative* values can be improved to something like: `vout cannot be negative`.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK f471a3be00c2b6433b8c258b716982c0539da13f
promag:
Code review ACK f471a3be00c2b6433b8c258b716982c0539da13f.
Tree-SHA512: fbdee3d0ddd5b58eb93934a1217b44e125a9ad39e672b1f35c7609c6c5fcf45ae1b731d3d6135b7225d98792dbfc34a50907b8c41274a5b029d7b5c59f886560
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
r() { sed -i 's/vout must be positive/vout cannot be negative/g' $1 }
r $(git grep -l 'vout must be positive')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
69cf5d4eeb73f7d685e915fc17af64634d88a4a2 [test] Make sure send rpc returns fee reason (Sishir Giri)
d5863c0b3e20d56acf7246008b7832efde68ab21 [send] Make send RPCs return fee reason (Sishir Giri)
Pull request description:
Whenever a wallet funds a transaction, the fee reason is reported to the user only if the verbose is set to true. I added an extra parameter to `CreateTransaction` function in wallet.cpp. Then I implemented the fee reason return logic in `SendMoney` in rpcwallet.cpp, followed by verbose parameter in `sendtoaddress` and `sendmany` functions. I also added a fee reason test case in walletbasic.py.
link to the issue: https://github.com/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/issues/22#issue-616251578
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19501/commits/69cf5d4eeb73f7d685e915fc17af64634d88a4a2
meshcollider:
utACK 69cf5d4eeb73f7d685e915fc17af64634d88a4a2
Tree-SHA512: 2e3af32dcfbd5511ba95f8bc8edca7acfe709a8430ff03e43172e5d0af3dfa4b2f57906978e7f272d878043b9ed8c6004674cf47d7496b005d5f612e9a58aa0e
|
|
f7b331ea85d45c7337e527b6e77a45da7a689b7d rpc: add brackets to ConstructTransaction (Sjors Provoost)
d813d26f06248aaa7be3c698c87939cc777fafd0 [rpc] send: various touch-ups (Sjors Provoost)
0fc1c685e1ca68ca8ed2b35f623bbe6a9fc36d66 [rpc] send: fix parsing replaceable option (Sjors Provoost)
efc9b85e6f4aa431d308089874a18f0bbdcdd0fd Mark send RPC experimental (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Followup based on #16378 nits. It also fixes an argument parsing error (uncaught because the test wasn't sufficiently thorough).
I marked the RPC as experimental so we can tweak it a bit over the next release cycle.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK f7b331ea85d45c7337e527b6e77a45da7a689b7d
fjahr:
utACK f7b331ea85d45c7337e527b6e77a45da7a689b7d
kallewoof:
ACK f7b331ea85d45c7337e527b6e77a45da7a689b7d
Tree-SHA512: 82dd8ac76a6558872db3f5249d4d6440469400aaa339153bc627d1ee673a91ecfadecb486bc1939ba87ebbd80e26ff29698e93e358599f3d26fde0e526892afe
|
|
|
|
a512925e19a70d7f6b80ac530a169f45ffaafa1c [doc] Release notes (Amiti Uttarwar)
50f94b34a33c954f6e207f509c93d33267a5c3e2 [rpc] Deprecate getpeerinfo addnode field (Amiti Uttarwar)
df091b9b509f0b10e4315c0bfa2da0cc0c31c22f [refactor] Rename test file to allow any getpeerinfo deprecations. (Amiti Uttarwar)
395acfa83a5436790c1a722a5609ac9d48df235f [rpc] Add connection type to getpeerinfo RPC, update tests (Amiti Uttarwar)
49c10a9ca40967d28ae16dfea9cccc6f3a6624a1 [log] Add connection type to log statement (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
After #19316, we can more directly expose information about the connection type on the `getpeerinfo` RPC. Doing so also makes the existing addnode field redundant, so this PR begins the process of deprecating this field.
This PR also includes one commit that improves a log message, as both use a shared function to return the connection type as a string.
Suggested by sdaftuar- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19316#discussion_r468001604 & https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19316#discussion_r468018093
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK a512925e19a70d7f6b80ac530a169f45ffaafa1c.
sipa:
utACK a512925e19a70d7f6b80ac530a169f45ffaafa1c
guggero:
Tested and code review ACK a512925e.
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK a512925e19a70d7f6b80ac530a169f45ffaafa1c 🌇
promag:
Code review ACK a512925e19a70d7f6b80ac530a169f45ffaafa1c.
Tree-SHA512: 601a7a38aee235ee59aca690784f886dc2ae4e418b2e6422c4b58cd597376c00f74910f66920b08a08a0bec28bf8022e71a1435785ff6ba8a188954261aba78e
|
|
rpcwallet)
fa14f57fbc3c1fa2b9eea5df687f0fb36d452bd5 Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (net, rpcwallet) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is the last part split out from #18531 to just touch some RPC methods. Description from the main pr:
### Motivation
RPCArg names in the rpc help are currently only used for documentation. However, in the future they could be used to teach the server the named arguments. Named arguments are currently registered by the `CRPCCommand`s and duplicate the RPCArg names from the documentation. This redundancy is fragile, and has lead to errors in the past (despite having linters to catch those kind of errors). See section "bugs found" for a list of bugs that have been found as a result of the changes here.
### Changes
The changes here add an assert in the `CRPCCommand` constructor that the RPCArg names are identical to the ones in the `CRPCCommand`.
### Future work
> Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue?
Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including:
* Removing the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant
* Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table
* Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan
* Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks
* Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation
* Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static
### Bugs found
* The assert identified issue #18607
* The changes itself fixed bug #19250
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tACK fa14f57fbc3c1fa2b9eea5df687f0fb36d452bd5
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa14f57fbc3c1fa2b9eea5df687f0fb36d452bd5. Just straightforward replacements except code moved in `addnode`, and displatching updated in `bumpfee_helper`
Tree-SHA512: e07af150f1d95a88e558256ce197a6b7dc6cd722a6d6c13c75d944c49c2e2441f8b8237e9f94b03db69fa18f9bda627b0781d5e1da70bf5415e09b38728a8cb1
|
|
|
|
Using the zmq notifications to avoid excessive mempool polling can be difficult
given the current notifications available. It announces all transactions
being added to mempool or included in blocks, but announces no evictions
and gives no indication if the transaction is in the mempool or a block.
Block notifications for zmq are also substandard, in that it only announces
block tips, while all block transactions are still announced.
This commit adds a unified stream which can be used to closely track mempool:
1) getrawmempool to fill out mempool knowledge
2) if txhash is announced, add or remove from set
based on add/remove flag
3) if blockhash is announced, get block txn list,
remove from those transactions local view of mempool
4) if we drop a sequence number, go to (1)
The mempool sequence number starts at the value 1, and
increments each time a transaction enters the mempool,
or is evicted from the mempool for any reason, including
block inclusion. The mempool sequence number is published
via ZMQ for any transaction-related notification.
These features allow for ZMQ/RPC consumer to track mempool
state in a more exacting way, without unnecesarily polling
getrawmempool. See interface_zmq.py::test_mempool_sync for
example usage.
|
|
(blockchain,rawtransaction)
fa6bb0ce5dba33970e2c1e47ea4d0d2c0718eccb Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (rawtransaction) (MarcoFalke)
fa80c814874a2893e4323ba5148fba21d7f421cd Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (blockchain) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is split out from #18531 to just touch some RPC methods. Description from the main pr:
### Motivation
RPCArg names in the rpc help are currently only used for documentation. However, in the future they could be used to teach the server the named arguments. Named arguments are currently registered by the `CRPCCommand`s and duplicate the RPCArg names from the documentation. This redundancy is fragile, and has lead to errors in the past (despite having linters to catch those kind of errors). See section "bugs found" for a list of bugs that have been found as a result of the changes here.
### Changes
The changes here add an assert in the `CRPCCommand` constructor that the RPCArg names are identical to the ones in the `CRPCCommand`.
### Future work
> Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue?
Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including:
* Removing the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant
* Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table
* Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan
* Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks
* Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation
* Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static
### Bugs found
* The assert identified issue #18607
* The changes itself fixed bug #19250
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
utACK fa6bb0ce5dba33970e2c1e47ea4d0d2c0718eccb
tryphe:
utACK fa6bb0ce5dba33970e2c1e47ea4d0d2c0718eccb. Reducing data duplication is nice. Code changes are minimal and concise.
Tree-SHA512: deb0edc3f999baf055526eaa199b98c500635e12502dece7aa3cad5319db330eb5ee7459a5c8f040a83671a7f20c560c19a2026fb76c8416f138aa332727cbce
|
|
This field is now redundant since the connection type field will indicate
MANUAL for addnode connections.
|
|
|
|
23c35bf0059bd6270218e0b732959e9c754f9812 [test] add get_vsize util for more programmatic testing (gzhao408)
2233a93a109b10b6fe0f5f26c2bb529c8de3dde7 [rpc] Return fee and vsize from testmempoolaccept (codeShark149)
Pull request description:
From #19093 and resolves #19057.
Difference from #19093: return `vsize` and `fees` object (similar to `getmempoolentry`) when the test accept is successful. Updates release-notes.md.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 23c35bf0059bd6270218e0b732959e9c754f9812
fjahr:
utACK 23c35bf
instagibbs:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19940/commits/23c35bf0059bd6270218e0b732959e9c754f9812
Tree-SHA512: dcb81b7b817a4684e9076bc5d427a6f2d549d2edc66544e718260c4b5f8f1d5ae1d47b754175e9f0c8a3bd8371ce116c2dca0583588d513a7d733d5d614f2b04
|
|
|
|
Return fee and vsize if tx would pass ATMP.
|
|
|
|
This is of neglible use here, but it allows new RPC methods to take outputs as their first argument and make inputs optional.
|
|
296be8f58e02b39a58f017c52294aceed22c3ffd Get rid of unused functions CTxMemPool::GetMemPoolChildren, CTxMemPool::GetMemPoolParents (Jeremy Rubin)
46d955d196043cc297834baeebce31ff778dff80 Remove mapLinks in favor of entry inlined structs with iterator type erasure (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Currently we have a peculiar data structure in the mempool called maplinks. Maplinks job is to track the in-pool children and parents of each transaction. This PR can be primarily understood and reviewed as a simple refactoring to remove this extra data structure, although it comes with a nice memory and performance improvement for free.
Maplinks is particularly peculiar because removing it is not as simple as just moving it's inner structure to the owning CTxMempoolEntry. Because TxLinks (the class storing the setEntries for parents and children) store txiters to each entry in the mempool corresponding to the parent or child, it means that the TxLinks type is "aware" of the boost multiindex (mapTx) it's coming from, which is in turn, aware of the entry type stored in mapTx. Thus we used maplinks to store this entry associated data we in an entirely separate data structure just to avoid a circular type reference caused by storing a txiter inside a CTxMempoolEntry.
It turns out, we can kill this circular reference by making use of iterator_to multiindex function and std::reference_wrapper. This allows us to get rid of the maplinks data structure and move the ownership of the parents/child sets to the entries themselves.
The benefit of this good all around, for any of the reasons given below the change would be acceptable, and it doesn't make the code harder to reason about or worse in any respect (as far as I can tell, there's no tradeoff).
### Simpler ownership model
No longer having to consistency check that mapLinks did have records for our CTxMempoolEntry, impossible to have a mapLinks entry outlive or incorrectly die before a CTxMempoolEntry.
### Memory Usage
We get rid of a O(Transactions) sized map in the mempool, which is a long lived data structure.
### Performance
If you have a CTxMemPoolEntry, you immediately know the address of it's children/parents, rather than having to do a O(log(Transactions)) lookup via maplinks (which we do very often). We do it in *so many* places that a true benchmark has to look at a full running node, but it is easy enough to show an improvement in this case.
The ComplexMemPool shows a good coherence check that we see the expected result of it being 12.5% faster / 1.14x faster.
```
Before:
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 1.40462, 0.277222, 0.285339, 0.279793
After:
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 1.22586, 0.243831, 0.247076, 0.244596
```
The ComplexMemPool benchmark only checks doing addUnchecked and TrimToSize for 800 transactions. While this bench does a good job of hammering the relevant types of function, it doesn't test everything.
Subbing in 5000 transactions shows a that the advantage isn't completely wiped out by other asymptotic factors (this isn't the only bottleneck in growing the mempool), but it's only a bit proportionally slower (10.8%, 1.12x), which adds evidence that this will be a good change for performance minded users.
```
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 59.1321, 11.5919, 12.235, 11.7068
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 52.1307, 10.2641, 10.5206, 10.4306
```
I don't think it's possible to come up with an example of where a maplinks based design would have better performance, but it's something for reviewers to consider.
# Discussion
## Why maplinks in the first place?
I spoke with the author of mapLinks (sdaftuar) a while back, and my recollection from our conversation was that it was implemented because he did not know how to resolve the circular dependency at the time, and there was no other reason for making it a separate map.
## Is iterator_to weird?
iterator_to is expressly for this purpose, see https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_51_0/libs/multi_index/doc/tutorial/indices.html#iterator_to
> iterator_to provides a way to retrieve an iterator to an element from a pointer to the element, thus making iterators and pointers interchangeable for the purposes of element pointing (not so for traversal) in many situations. This notwithstanding, it is not the aim of iterator_to to promote the usage of pointers as substitutes for real iterators: the latter are specifically designed for handling the elements of a container, and not only benefit from the iterator orientation of container interfaces, but are also capable of exposing many more programming bugs than raw pointers, both at compile and run time. iterator_to is thus meant to be used in scenarios where access via iterators is not suitable or desireable:
>
> - Interoperability with preexisting APIs based on pointers or references.
> - Publication of pointer-based interfaces (for instance, when designing a C-compatible library).
> - The exposure of pointers in place of iterators can act as a type erasure barrier effectively decoupling the user of the code from the implementation detail of which particular container is being used. Similar techniques, like the famous Pimpl idiom, are used in large projects to reduce dependencies and build times.
> - Self-referencing contexts where an element acts upon its owner container and no iterator to itself is available.
In other words, iterator_to is the perfect tool for the job by the last reason given. Under the hood it should just be a simple pointer cast and have no major runtime overhead (depending on if the function call is inlined).
Edit by laanwj: removed at sign from the description
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 296be8f per `git range-diff ab338a19 3ba1665 296be8f`, sanity check gcc 10.2 debug build is clean.
hebasto:
re-ACK 296be8f58e02b39a58f017c52294aceed22c3ffd, only rebased since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19478#pullrequestreview-482400727) review (verified with `git range-diff`).
Tree-SHA512: f5c30a4936fcde6ae32a02823c303b3568a747c2681d11f87df88a149f984a6d3b4c81f391859afbeb68864ef7f6a3d8779f74a58e3de701b3d51f78e498682e
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and `-getinfo`
581b343d5bf517510ab0236583ca96628751177d Add in/out connections to cli -getinfo (Jon Atack)
d9cc13e88d096c1a171159c01cbb96444f7f8d7f UNIX_EPOCH_TIME fixup in rpc getnettotals (Jon Atack)
1ab49b81cf32b6ef9e312a0a8ac45c68a3262f0d Add in/out connections to rpc getnetworkinfo (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is basic info that is present in the GUI that I've been wishing to have exposed via the RPC and CLI without needing a bash workaround or script. For human users it would also be useful to have it in `-getinfo`.
`bitcoin-cli getnetworkinfo`
```
"connections": 15,
"connections_in": 6,
"connections_out": 9,
```
`bitcoin-cli -getinfo`
```
"connections": {
"in": 6,
"out": 9,
"total": 15
},
```
Update the tests, RPC help, and release notes for the changes. Also fixup the `getnettotals` timemillis help while touching `rpc/net.cpp`.
-----
Reviewers can manually test this PR by [building from source](https://jonatack.github.io/articles/how-to-compile-bitcoin-core-and-run-the-tests), launching bitcoind, and then running `bitcoin-cli -getinfo`, `bitcoin-cli getnetworkinfo`, `bitcoin-cli help getnetworkinfo`, and `bitcoin-cli help getnettotals` (for the UNIX epoch time change).
ACKs for top commit:
eriknylund:
> tACK [581b343](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/581b343d5bf517510ab0236583ca96628751177d) on master at [a0a422c](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/a0a422c34cfd6514d0cc445bd784d3ee1a2d1749), ran unit & functional tests and and confirmed changes on an existing datadir ✌️
benthecarman:
tACK `581b343`
willcl-ark:
tACK for 581b343d5bf517510ab0236583ca96628751177d, this time rebased onto master at 862fde88be706adb20a211178253636442c3ae00.
shesek:
tACK `581b343`. This provides what I needed, thanks!
n-thumann:
tACK 581b343 on master at a0a422c, ran unit & functional tests and and confirmed changes on an existing datadir ✌️
Tree-SHA512: 08dd3ac8fefae401bd8253ff3ac027603c528eeccba53cedcb127771316173a7052fce44af8fa33ac98ebc4cf2a2b11cdefd949995d55e9b9a5942b876d00dc5
|
|
|
|
|
|
(mining,zmq,rpcdump)
fa3d9ce3254882c545d700990fe8e9a678f31eed rpc: Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (rpcdump) (MarcoFalke)
fa32c1d5ec25bc53bf989a8ae68e688593d2859d rpc: Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (zmq) (MarcoFalke)
faaa46dc204d6d714f71dbc6f0bf02215dba0f0f rpc: Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (mining) (MarcoFalke)
fa93bc14c7411a108dd024d391344fabf0f76369 rpc: Remove unused return type from appendCommand (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is split out from #18531 to just touch the RPC methods in misc. Description from the main pr:
### Motivation
RPCArg names in the rpc help are currently only used for documentation. However, in the future they could be used to teach the server the named arguments. Named arguments are currently registered by the `CRPCCommand`s and duplicate the RPCArg names from the documentation. This redundancy is fragile, and has lead to errors in the past (despite having linters to catch those kind of errors). See section "bugs found" for a list of bugs that have been found as a result of the changes here.
### Changes
The changes here add an assert in the `CRPCCommand` constructor that the RPCArg names are identical to the ones in the `CRPCCommand`.
### Future work
> Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue?
Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including:
* Removing the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant
* Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table
* Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan
* Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks
* Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation
* Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static
### Bugs found
* The assert identified issue #18607
* The changes itself fixed bug #19250
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK fa3d9ce3254882c545d700990fe8e9a678f31eed
promag:
Code review ACK fa3d9ce3254882c545d700990fe8e9a678f31eed.
Tree-SHA512: 068ade4b55cc195868d53b7f9a27151d45b440857bb069e261a49d102a49a38fdba5d68868516a1d66a54a73ba34681362f934ded7349e894042bde873b75719
|
|
8e35bf59062b3a823182588e0bf809b3367c2be0 scripted-diff: rename misbehavior members (John Newbery)
1f96d2e673a78220eebf3bbd15b121c51c4cd97b [net processing] Move misbehavior tracking state to Peer (John Newbery)
7cd4159ac834432dadd60a5e8ee817f3cadbee55 [net processing] Add Peer (John Newbery)
aba03359a6e62a376ae44914f609f82a1556fc89 [net processing] Remove CNodeState.name (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We currently have two structures for per-peer data:
- `CNode` in net, which should just contain connection layer data (eg socket, send/recv buffers, etc), but currently also contains some application layer data (eg tx/block inventory).
- `CNodeState` in net processing, which contains p2p application layer data, but requires cs_main to be locked for access.
This PR adds a third struct `Peer`, which is for p2p application layer data, and doesn't require cs_main. Eventually all application layer data from `CNode` should be moved to `Peer`, and any data that doesn't strictly require cs_main should be moved from `CNodeState` to `Peer` (probably all of `CNodeState` eventually).
`Peer` objects are stored as shared pointers in a net processing global map `g_peer_map`, which is protected by `g_peer_mutex`. To use a `Peer` object, `g_peer_mutex` is locked, a copy of the shared pointer is taken, and the lock is released. Individual members of `Peer` are protected by different mutexes that guard related data. The lifetime of the `Peer` object is managed by the shared_ptr refcount.
This PR adds the `Peer` object and moves the misbehaving data from `CNodeState` to `Peer`. This allows us to immediately remove 15 `LOCK(cs_main)` instances.
For more motivation see #19398
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 8e35bf59062b3a823182588e0bf809b3367c2be0
troygiorshev:
reACK 8e35bf59062b3a823182588e0bf809b3367c2be0 via `git range-diff master 9510938 8e35bf5`
theuni:
ACK 8e35bf59062b3a823182588e0bf809b3367c2be0.
jonatack:
ACK 8e35bf59062b3a823182588e0bf809b3367c2be0 keeping in mind Cory's comment (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19607#discussion_r470173964) for the follow-up
Tree-SHA512: ad84a92b78fb34c9f43813ca3dfbc7282c887d55300ea2ce0994d134da3e0c7dbc44d54380e00b13bb75a57c28857ac3236bea9135467075d78026767a19e4b1
|
|
c91b241b48d7f97b3e6b39d84ec780f2a3e3a0a7 Updated outdated help command for getblocktemplate (fixes #19625) (Jake Leventhal)
Pull request description:
**Summary of Changes**
* Removed coinbasetxn from the help outputs
* Added the missing name for transactions in the help outputs
* Added help outputs for longpollid and default_witness_commitment
* Added more clarity to capabilities, rules, and coinbaseaux
**Rationale**
The outputs from the help command for `getblocktemplate` are outdated and don't reflect the actual results from `getblocktemplate` (see #19625 for more details)
Fixes #19625.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK c91b241b48d7f97b3e6b39d84ec780f2a3e3a0a7
fjahr:
utACK c91b241b48d7f97b3e6b39d84ec780f2a3e3a0a7
Tree-SHA512: ee443af4bc3b2838dfd92e2705f344256ee785ae720e505fffea9b0ec5b75930e3b1374bae59b36d5da57c85c9aefe4d62504b028b893d6f2914dccf1e34c658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block/last_transaction in getpeerinfo
5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257 doc: release note for getpeerinfo last_block/last_transaction (Jon Atack)
cfef5a2c98b9563392a4a258fedb8bdc869c9749 test: rpc_net.py logging and test naming improvements (Jon Atack)
21c57bacda766a4f56ee75a2872f5d0f94e3901e test: getpeerinfo last_block and last_transaction tests (Jon Atack)
8a560a7d57cbd9f473d6a3782893a0e2243c55bd rpc: expose nLastBlockTime/TXTime as getpeerinfo last_block/transaction (Jon Atack)
02fbe3ae0bd91cbab2828cb7aa46f6493c82f026 net: add nLastBlockTime/TXTime to CNodeStats, CNode::copyStats (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR adds inbound peer eviction criteria `nLastBlockTime` and `nLastTXTime` to `CNodeStats` and `CNode::copyStats`, which then allows exposing them in the next commit as `last_transaction` and `last_block` Unix Epoch Time fields in RPC `getpeerinfo`.
This may be useful for writing missing eviction tests. I'd also like to add `lasttx` and `lastblk` columns to the `-netinfo` dashboard as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19643#issuecomment-671093420.
Relevant discussion at the p2p irc meeting http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-08-11.html#l-549:
```text
<jonatack> i was specifically trying to observe and figure out how to test https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19500
<jonatack> which made me realise that i didn't know what was going on with my peer conns in enough detail
<jonatack> i'm running bitcoin locally with nLastBlockTime and nLastTXTime added to getpeerinfo for my peer connections dashboard
<jonatack> sipa: is there a good reason why that (eviction criteria) data is not exposed through getpeerinfo currently?
<sipa> jonatack: nope; i suspect just nobody ever added it
<jonatack> sipa: thanks. will propose.
```
The last commit is optional, but I think it would be good to have logging in `rpc_net.py`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257
theStack:
Code Review ACK 5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257
darosior:
ACK 5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257
Tree-SHA512: 2db164bc979c014837a676e890869a128beb7cf40114853239e7280f57e768bcb43bff6c1ea76a61556212135281863b5290b50ff9d24fce16c5b89b55d4cd70
|
|
It does count the coinbase transaction.
Refs #19766
|
|
124e1ee1343f8bfb3748393ced9debdbdee60d3b doc: Add release notes for getindexinfo RPC (Fabian Jahr)
c447b09458c89c946957a211a4f5373b92af44bf test: Add tests for getindexinfo RPC (Fabian Jahr)
667bc7a7f7c5d9a15eaf6957c3d8841a75efa7bc rpc: Add getindexinfo RPC (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
As I was playing with indices a I was missing an RPC that gives information about the active indices in the node. I think this can be helpful for many users, especially since there are some new index candidates coming up (#14053, #18000) that can give a quick overview without the user having to parse the logs.
Feature summary:
- Adds new RPC `listindices` (placed in Util section)
- That RPC only lists the actively running indices
- For each index it gives the name, whether it is synced and up to which block height it is synced
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Re-ACK 124e1ee1343f8bfb3748393ced9debdbdee60d3b
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 124e1ee per `git range-diff a57af89 47a5372 124e1ee` no change since my last re-ACK, rebase only
Tree-SHA512: 3b7174c87951e6457fef099f530337803906baf32fb64261410b8def2c0917853d6a1bf3059cd590b1cc1523608f8916dafb327a431d27ecbf8d7454406b5b35
|
|
|
|
|
