| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Co-authored-by: Pieter Wuille <bitcoin-dev@wuille.net>
|
|
The current argument name and description are dangerous as it don't
describe the case where the user selects the recipient output as the
change address. This one could end up been increased by the inputs
minus outputs remainder. Which, when bumpfee adds new inputs
to the transaction, leads the process to send more coins to the
recipient. Which is not what the user would expect from a
'reduce_output' param naming.
Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
|
|
This rpc can be used when we want a node to send a message, but
cannot use a python P2P object, for example for testing of low-level
net transport behavior.
|
|
test_importmempool_union contributed by glozow
Co-authored-by: glozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com>
|
|
is change
e8c31f135c6e9a5f57325dbf4feceafd384f7762 tests: Test for bumping single output transaction (Andrew Chow)
4f4d4407e3d2cc5ac784524c0cb0602837dc7860 test: Test bumpfee reduce_output (Andrew Chow)
7d83502d3d52218e7b0b0634cff2a9aba9cc77ef bumpfee: Allow original change position to be specified (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When bumping the transaction fee, we will try to find the change output of the transaction in order to have an output whose value we can modify so that we can meet the target feerate. However we do not always find the change output which can cause us to unnecessarily add an additional output to the transaction. We can avoid this issue by outsourcing the determination of change to the user if they so desire.
This PR adds a `orig_change_pos` option to bumpfee which the user can use to specify the index of the change output.
Fixes #11233
Fixes #20795
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
re ACK e8c31f135c6e9a5f57325dbf4feceafd384f7762
pinheadmz:
re-ACK e8c31f135c6e9a5f57325dbf4feceafd384f7762
furszy:
Code review ACK e8c31f13
Tree-SHA512: 3a230655934af17f7c1a5953fafb5ef0d687c21355cf284d5e98fece411f589cd69ea505f06d6bdcf82836b08d268c366ad2dd30ae3d71541c9cdf94d1f698ee
|
|
If the user used a custom change address, it may not be detected as a
change output, resulting in an additional change output being added to
the bumped transaction. We can avoid this issue by allowing the user to
specify the position of the change output.
|
|
Any identifier starting with two _, or one _ followed by a capital letter is reserved for the compiler and thus must not be used. See: https://stackoverflow.com/a/228797/7130273
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
s() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; }
s '__pushKV' 'pushKVEnd'
s '_EraseTx' 'EraseTxNoLock'
s '_Other' 'Other'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
ParseNonRFCJSONValue() and rename it
cfbc8a623b5133f1d0b0c0c9be73b2b107e0d687 refactor: rpc: hide and rename ParseNonRFCJSONValue() (stickies-v)
6c8bde6d54d03224709dce54b8ba32b8c3e37ac7 test: move coverage on ParseNonRFCJSONValue() to UniValue::read() (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26612#issuecomment-1453623741. As per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26506#pullrequestreview-1211984059, `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` is no longer necessary and we can use `UniValue::read()` directly:
> IIRC before that PR UniValue::read could only parse JSON object and array values, but now it will parse string/number/boolean/null values as well. laanwj pointed this out in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9028#issuecomment-257885368
The implementation of `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` was already [simplified in #26612](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26612/files#diff-84c7a7f36362b9724c31e5dec9879b2f81eae0d0addbc9c0933c3558c577de65R259-R263) and [test coverage updated](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26612/files#diff-fc0f86b6c3bb23b0e983bcf79d7546d1c9eaa15d6e4d8a7b03b5b85955f585abR292-R312) to ensure behaviour didn't change.
To avoid code duplication, we keep the function to throw on invalid input data but rename it to `Parse()` and remove it from the header.
The existing test coverage we had on `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` is moved over to `UniValue::read()`.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cfbc8a623b5133f1d0b0c0c9be73b2b107e0d687. Only change since last review is adding a new test
Tree-SHA512: 89be959d2353af7ace0c1348ba1600b9ac1d3c7b3cf7f0b59f6e005b7fb9d695ce3e8720e1be3cf77fe7e318a4017c880df108928e7179ec50447583d13bc781
|
|
2cd28e9fef5dd743bcd70025196ee311fcfdcae4 rpc: Add check for unintended option/parameter name clashes (Ryan Ofsky)
95d7de0964620a3f7386a4adc5707559868abf84 test: Update python tests to use named parameters instead of options objects (Ryan Ofsky)
96233146dd31c1d99fd1619be4449944623ef750 RPC: Allow RPC methods accepting options to take named parameters (Ryan Ofsky)
702b56d2a8ce48bc3b66a2867d09fa11dcf12fc5 RPC: Add add OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Allow RPC methods which take an `options` parameter (`importmulti`, `listunspent`, `fundrawtransaction`, `bumpfee`, `send`, `sendall`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `simulaterawtransaction`), to accept the options as named parameters, without the need for nested JSON objects.
This makes it possible to make calls like:
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid fee_rate=10
```
instead of
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid options='{"fee_rate": 10}'
```
RPC help is also updated to show options as top level named arguments instead of as nested objects.
<details><summary>diff</summary>
<p>
```diff
@@ -15,16 +15,17 @@
Arguments:
1. txid (string, required) The txid to be bumped
-2. options (json object, optional)
+2. options (json object, optional) Options object that can be used to pass named arguments, listed below.
+
+Named Arguments:
- {
- "conf_target": n, (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
+conf_target (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
- "fee_rate": amount, (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
+fee_rate (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
Specify a fee rate in sat/vB instead of relying on the built-in fee estimator.
Must be at least 1.000 sat/vB higher than the current transaction fee rate.
WARNING: before version 0.21, fee_rate was in BTC/kvB. As of 0.21, fee_rate is in sat/vB.
- "replaceable": bool, (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
+replaceable (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
marked bip-125 replaceable. If true, the sequence numbers in the transaction will
be left unchanged from the original. If false, any input sequence numbers in the
original transaction that were less than 0xfffffffe will be increased to 0xfffffffe
@@ -32,11 +33,10 @@
still be replaceable in practice, for example if it has unconfirmed ancestors which
are replaceable).
- "estimate_mode": "str", (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
+estimate_mode (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
"unset"
"economical"
"conservative"
- }
Result:
{ (json object)
```
</p>
</details>
**Review suggestion:** To understand this PR, it is probably easiest to review the commits in reverse order because the last commit shows the external API changes, the middle commit shows the internal API changes, and the first commit contains the low-level implementation.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 2cd28e9fef5dd743bcd70025196ee311fcfdcae4
Tree-SHA512: 50f6e78fa622826dab3f810400d8c1a03a98a090b1f2fea79729c58ad8cff955554bd44c2a5975f62a526b900dda68981862fd7d7d05c17f94f5b5d847317436
|
|
This RPC can be the Updater, Signer, and optionally the Input
Finalizer for a psbt, and has no interaction with the Bitcoin
Core wallet.
|
|
Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <github@achow101.com>
|
|
This is an extraction of ArgsManager related functions from util/system
into their own common file.
Config file related functions are moved to common/config.cpp.
The background of this commit is an ongoing effort to decouple the
libbitcoinkernel library from the ArgsManager. The ArgsManager belongs
into the common library, since the kernel library should not depend on
it. See doc/design/libraries.md for more information on this rationale.
|
|
As per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26506#pullrequestreview-1211984059,
this function is no longer necessary and we can use UniValue::read() directly.
To avoid code duplication, we keep the function to throw on invalid input data
but rename it to Parse() and remove it from the header.
|
|
|
|
string_view
545ff924ab6303ffabd91fdfc4f0a4962daf133c refactor: use string_view for RPC named argument values (stickies-v)
7727603e44f8f674e0fc8389e78047e2b56e6052 refactor: reduce unnecessary complexity in ParseNonRFCJSONValue (stickies-v)
1d02e599012721549d4c20b1b37fcc5ee7b961b6 test: add cases to JSON parsing (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Inspired by MarcoFalke's [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26506#discussion_r1036149426). Main purpose of this PR is to minimize copying (potentially large) RPC named arguments when calling `.substr()` by using `std::string_view` instead of `std::string`. Furthermore, cleans up the code by removing unnecessary complexity in `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` (done first to avoid refactoring required to concatenate `string` and `string_view`), updates some naming and adds a few test cases. Should not introduce any behaviour change.
## Questions
- ~Was there actually any merit to `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` surrounding the value with brackets and then parsing it as an array? I don't see it, and the new approach doesn't fail any tests. Still a bit suspicious about it though.~
- Cleared up by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26506#pullrequestreview-1211984059
- If there are no objections to 7727603e44f8f674e0fc8389e78047e2b56e6052, I think we should follow up with a PR to rename `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` to a local `Parse()` helper function (that throws if invalid), remove it from `client.h` and merge the test coverage we currently have on `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` with the coverage we have on `UniValue::read()`.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 545ff924ab6303ffabd91fdfc4f0a4962daf133c
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 545ff924ab6303ffabd91fdfc4f0a4962daf133c 📻
Tree-SHA512: b1c89fb010ac9c3054b023cac1acbba2a539a09cf39a7baffbd7f7571ee268d5a6d98701c7ac10d68a814526e8fd0fe96ac1d1fb072f272033e415b753f64a5c
|
|
sendrawtransaction.
'maxburnamount' sets a maximum value for outputs heuristically deemed unspendable including datacarrier scripts that begin with `OP_RETURN`.
|
|
Minimize copying RPC named argument values when calling .substr() by
using std::string_view instead of std::string.
|
|
Since https://github.com/jgarzik/univalue/pull/31, UniValue::read() can now
parse raw literals directly, so there is no more need to wrap them into an
array first.
|
|
non-string parameters
6d0ab07e817725369df699791b9c5b2fae204990 refactor: use convenience fn to auto parse non-string parameters (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Minimizes code duplication and improves function naming by having a single (overloaded) convenience function `ParseIfNonString` that both checks if the parameter is a non-string parameter and automatically parses the value if so.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK 6d0ab07e817725369df699791b9c5b2fae204990
Tree-SHA512: 8cbf68a17cfbdce1e31a19916f447a2965c139fdef00c19e32a9b679f4a4015dfe69ceea0bbe1723711e1c5033ea8d4005d1f4485dfbeea22226140f8cbe8aa3
|
|
This makes use of undo data to accurately verify results
from blockfilters.
|
|
Minimizes code duplication and improves function naming by having
a single (overloaded) convenience function that both checks if
the parameter is a non-string parameter and automatically parses the
value if so.
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Commits of previous years:
- 2021: f47dda2c58b5d8d623e0e7ff4e74bc352dfa83d7
- 2020: fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
- 2019: aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
|
|
getrawtransaction
f86697163e5cdbc3bc4a65cfb7dbaa3d9eb602a9 rpc: Return fee and prevout(s) to getrawtransaction (Douglas Chimento)
Pull request description:
Add fee response in BTC to getrawtransaction #23264
### For Reviewers
* Verbose arg is now an int
* Verbose = 2 includes a `fee` field and `prevout`
* [./test/functional/rpc_rawtransaction.py](./test/functional/rpc_rawtransaction.py) contains a new test to validate fields of new verbosity 2 (not the values)
```
bitcoin-cli -chain=test getrawtransaction 9ae533f7da9be4a34997db78343a8d8d6d6186b6bba3959e56f416a5c70e7de4 2 000000000000001d442e556146d5f2841d85150c200e8d8b8a4b5005b13878f6
```
```
"in_active_chain": true,
"txid": "9ae533f7da9be4a34997db78343a8d8d6d6186b6bba3959e56f416a5c70e7de4",
"hash": "7f23e3f3a0a256ddea1d35ffd43e9afdd67cc68389ef1a804bb20c76abd6863e",
....
"vin": [
{
"txid": "23fc75d6d74f6f97e225839af69ff36a612fe04db58a4414ec4828d1749a05a0",
"vout": 0,
"scriptSig": {
"asm": "",
"hex": ""
},
"prevout": {
"generated": false,
"height": 2099486,
"value": 0.00017764,
"scriptPubKey": {
"asm": "0 7846ce1ced3253d8bd43008db2ca364cc722f5a2",
"hex": "00147846ce1ced3253d8bd43008db2ca364cc722f5a2",
"address": "tb1q0prvu88dxffa302rqzxm9j3kfnrj9adzk49mlp",
"type": "witness_v0_keyhash"
}
},
"sequence": 4294967295
},
...
"fee": 0.00000762
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f86697163e5cdbc3bc4a65cfb7dbaa3d9eb602a9
aureleoules:
ACK f86697163e5cdbc3bc4a65cfb7dbaa3d9eb602a9
hernanmarino:
re ACK f86697163e5cdbc3bc4a65cfb7dbaa3d9eb602a9
pablomartin4btc:
re-tACK f86697163e5cdbc3bc4a65cfb7dbaa3d9eb602a9
Tree-SHA512: 591fdc285d74fa7803e04ad01c7b70bc20fac6b1369e7bd5b8e2cde9b750ea52d6c70d79225b74bef4f4bbc0fb960877778017184e146119da4a55f9593d1224
|
|
MarcoFalke reported the case of positional arguments silently overwriting the
named "args" parameter in bitcoin-cli
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19762#discussion_r1035761471 and this
behavior is confusing and was not intended when support for "args" parameters
was added to bitcoin-cli in #19762.
Instead of letting one "args" value overwrite the other in the client, just
pass the values to the server verbatim, and let the error be handled server
side.
|
|
It's nice to be able to use named options and positional arguments together.
Most shell tools accept both, and python functions combine options and
arguments allowing them to be passed with even more flexibility. This change
adds support for python's approach so as a motivating example:
bitcoin-cli -named createwallet wallet_name=mywallet load_on_startup=1
Can be shortened to:
bitcoin-cli -named createwallet mywallet load_on_startup=1
JSON-RPC standard doesn't have a convention for passing named and positional
parameters together, so this implementation makes one up and interprets any
unused "args" named parameter as a positional parameter array.
|
|
* Add optional fee response in BTC to getrawtransaction
* Add optional prevout(s) response to getrawtransaction showing utxos being spent
* Add getrawtransaction_verbosity functional test to validate fields
|
|
Co-authored-by: James O'Beirne <james.obeirne@gmail.com>
|
|
a6b0c1fcc06485ecd320727fa7534a51a20608c1 doc: add releases notes for 25504 (listsinceblock updates) (Antoine Poinsot)
0fd2d144540b720626fc065a3cef5188831b5ee2 rpc: add an include_change parameter to listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55f98d087efd2609d808c082d5770306cc489409 rpc: output parent wallet descriptors for coins in listunspent (Antoine Poinsot)
b724476158a7dfeef9edfda3f519dfd6f93202a8 rpc: output wallet descriptors for received entries in listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55a82eaf91d252a04a0cc8ad7d948d956c6cb24f wallet: allow to fetch the wallet descriptors for a given Script (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Wallet descriptors are useful for applications using the Bitcoin Core wallet as a backend for tracking coins, as they allow to track coins for multiple descriptors in a single wallet. However there is no information currently given for such applications to link a coin with an imported descriptor, severely limiting the possibilities for such applications of using multiple descriptors in a single wallet. This PR outputs the matching imported descriptor(s) for a given received coin in `listsinceblock` (and friends).
It comes from a need for an application i'm working on, but i think it's something any software using `bitcoind` to track multiple descriptors in a single wallet would have eventually. For instance i'm thinking about the BDK project. Currently, the way to achieve this is to import raw addresses with labels and to have your application be responsible for wallet things like the gap limit.
I'll add this to the output of `listunspent` too if this gets a few Concept ACKs.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25504/commits/a6b0c1fcc06485ecd320727fa7534a51a20608c1
achow101:
re-ACK a6b0c1fcc06485ecd320727fa7534a51a20608c1
Tree-SHA512: 7a5850e8de98b439ddede2cb72de0208944f8cda67272e8b8037678738d55b7a5272375be808b0f7d15def4904430e089dafdcc037436858ff3292c5f8b75e37
|
|
It's useful for an external application tracking coins to not be limited
by our change detection. For instance, for a watchonly wallet with two
descriptors a transaction from one to the other would be considered a
change output and not be included in the result (if the address was not
generated by this wallet).
|
|
This command iterates over the inputs and outputs of the given transactions, and tallies up the balance change for the given wallet. This can be useful e.g. when verifying that a coin join like transaction doesn't contain unexpected inputs that the wallet will then sign for unintentionally.
|
|
It could be unsafe/confusing to create an actual mainnet interface while
package relay doesn't exist. However, a regtest-only interface allows
wallet/application devs to test current package policies.
|
|
We add an RPC to fetch the mempool transactions spending given outpoints.
Without this RPC, application developers would need to first call
`getrawmempool` which returns a long list of `txid`, then fetch each of
these txs individually to check whether they spend the given outpoint(s).
This RPC can later be enriched to also find confirmed transactions instead
of being restricted to mempool transactions.
|
|
_Motivation_
Currently, the wallet uses a fSubtractFeeAmount (SFFO) flag on the
recipients objects for all forms of sending calls. According to the
commit discussion, this flag was chiefly introduced to permit sweeping
without manually calculating the fees of transactions. However, the flag
leads to unintuitive behavior and makes it more complicated to test
many wallet RPCs exhaustively. We proposed to introduce a dedicated
`sendall` RPC with the intention to cover this functionality.
Since the proposal, it was discovered in further discussion that our
proposed `sendall` rpc and SFFO have subtly different scopes of
operation.
• sendall:
Use _specific UTXOs_ to pay a destination the remainder after fees.
• SFFO:
Use a _specific budget_ to pay an address the remainder after fees.
While `sendall` will simplify cases of spending from specific UTXOs,
emptying a wallet, or burning dust, we realized that there are some
cases in which SFFO is used to pay other parties from a limited budget,
which can often lead to the creation of change outputs. This cannot be
easily replicated using `sendall` as it would require manual computation
of the appropriate change amount.
As such, sendall cannot replace all uses of SFFO, but it still has a
different use case and will aid in simplifying some wallet calls and
numerous wallet tests.
_Sendall call details_
The proposed sendall call builds a transaction from a specific subset of
the wallet's UTXO pool (by default all of them) and assigns the funds to
one or more receivers. Receivers can either be specified with a specific
amount or receive an equal share of the remaining unassigned funds. At
least one recipient must be provided without assigned amount to collect
the remainder. The `sendall` call will never create change. The call has
a `send_max` option that changes the default behavior of spending all
UTXOs ("no UTXO left behind"), to maximizing the output amount of the
transaction by skipping uneconomic UTXOs. The `send_max` option is
incompatible with providing a specific set of inputs.
|
|
923312fbf6a89efde1739da0b7209694d4f892ba rpc: use peer_id, block_hash for FetchBlock (Sjors Provoost)
34d5399211eeb61e7e7961c301fb2ddea8aa3f6a rpc: more detailed errors for getblockfrompeer (Sjors Provoost)
60243cac7286e4c4bdda7094bef4cf6d1564b583 rpc: turn already downloaded into error in getblockfrompeer (Sjors Provoost)
809d66bb65aa78048e27c2a878d6f7becaecfe11 rpc: clarify getblockfrompeer behavior when called multiple times (Sjors Provoost)
0e3d7c5ee16d5a4c061ab9a57285bceb7899b512 refactor: drop redundant hash argument from FetchBlock (Sjors Provoost)
8d1a3e6498de6087501969a9d243b0697ca3fe97 rpc: allow empty JSON object result (Sjors Provoost)
bfbf91d0b2004dde358253ac174982f784b43b59 test: fancier Python for getblockfrompeer (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Followups from #20295.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 923312fbf6a89efde1739da0b7209694d4f892ba :package:
fjahr:
tested ACK 923312fbf6a89efde1739da0b7209694d4f892ba
Tree-SHA512: da9eca76e302e249409c9d7f0d16cca668ed981e2ab6ca2d1743dad0d830b94b1bc5ffb9028a00764b863201945c273cc8f4409a4c9ca3817830007dffa2bc20
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Commits of previous years:
* 2020: fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
* 2019: aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
|
|
|
|
dce8c4c38111556ca480aa0e63c46b71f66b508f rpc: getblockfrompeer (Sjors Provoost)
b884ababc29ce963826d8a4327ed6a5e629ff175 rpc: move Ensure* helpers to server_util.h (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This adds an RPC method to fetch a block directly from a peer. This can used to fetch stale blocks with lower proof of work that are normally ignored by the node (`headers-only` in `getchaintips`).
Usage:
```
bitcoin-cli getblockfrompeer HASH peer_n
```
Closes #20155
Limitations:
* you have to specify which peer to fetch the block from
* the node must already have the header
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK dce8c4c38111556ca480aa0e63c46b71f66b508f
fjahr:
re-ACK dce8c4c38111556ca480aa0e63c46b71f66b508f
Tree-SHA512: 843ba2b7a308f640770d624d0aa3265fdc5c6ea48e8db32269b96a082b7420f7953d1d8d1ef2e6529392c7172dded9d15639fbc9c24e7bfa5cfb79e13a5498c8
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
|
|
We don't always want to finalize after signing, so make it possible to
do that.
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Create a fee_rate (sat/vB) RPC param and replace overloading the conf_target and
estimate_mode params in the following 6 RPCs with it:
- sendtoaddress
- sendmany
- send
- fundrawtransaction
- walletcreatefundedpsbt
- bumpfee
In RPC bumpfee, the previously existing fee_rate remains but the unit is changed
from BTC/kvB to sat/vB. This is a breaking change, but it should not be an
overly risky one, as the units change by a factor of 1e5 and any fees specified
in BTC/kvB after this commit will either be too low and raise an error or be 1
sat/vB and can be RBFed.
Update the test coverage for each RPC.
Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
|
|
|
