aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/rest.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-08-16Fix logical race in rest_getutxosMacroFake
Calling ActiveHeight() and ActiveTip() subsequently without holding the ::cs_main lock over both calls may result in a height that does not correspond to the tip due to a race. Fix this by holding the lock.
2022-08-05rest: clean-up for `mempool` endpointsbrunoerg
2022-06-15rest/getutxos: Don't construct empty mempoolCarl Dong
...just don't try to consult it at all when fCheckMemPool is false
2022-05-18Do not call global Params() when chainman is in scopeMacroFake
2022-04-26Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22953: refactor: introduce single-separator split ↵fanquake
helper (boost::split replacement) a62e84438d27ee6213219fe2c233e58814fcbb5d fuzz: add `SplitString` fuzz target (MarcoFalke) 4fad7e46d94a0fdee4ff917e81360d7ae6bd8110 test: add unit tests for `SplitString` helper (Kiminuo) 9cc8e876e412056ed22d364538f0da3d5d71946d refactor: introduce single-separator split helper `SplitString` (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This PR adds a simple string split helper `SplitString` that takes use of the spanparsing `Split` function that was first introduced in #13697 (commit fe8a7dcd78cfeedc9a7c705e91384f793822912b). This enables to replace most calls to `boost::split`, in the cases where only a single separator character is used. Note that while previous attempts to replace `boost::split` were controversial (e.g. #13751), this one has a trivial implementation: it merely uses an internal helper (that is unit tested and in regular use with output descriptiors) and converts its result from spans to strings. As a drawback though, not all `boost::split` instances can be tackled. As a possible optimization, one could return a vector of `std::string_view`s (available since C++17) instead of strings, to avoid copies. This would need more carefulness on the caller sites though, to avoid potential lifetime issues, and it's probably not worth it, considering that none of the places where strings are split are really performance-critical. ACKs for top commit: martinus: Code review ACK a62e84438d27ee6213219fe2c233e58814fcbb5d. Ran all tests. I also like that with `boost::split` it was not obvious that the resulting container was cleared, and with `SplitString` API that's obvious. Tree-SHA512: 10cb22619ebe46831b1f8e83584a89381a036b54c88701484ac00743e2a62cfe52c9f3ecdbb2d0815e536c99034558277cc263600ec3f3588b291c07eef8ed24
2022-04-19move-mostly: Make fHavePruned a BlockMan memberCarl Dong
[META] In the next commit, we move the clearing of fHavePruned to BlockManager::Unload()
2022-04-11refactor: introduce single-separator split helper `SplitString`Sebastian Falbesoner
This helper uses spanparsing::Split internally and enables to replace all calls to boost::split where only a single separator is passed. Co-authored-by: Martin Ankerl <Martin.Ankerl@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
2022-04-06doc: Convert remaining comments to clang-tidy formatMarcoFalke
2022-04-06Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24098: rest: Use query parameters to control resource ↵MarcoFalke
loading 54b39cfb342d10a448d49299c715e3a25c2aca4a Add release notes (stickies-v) f959fc0397c3f3615e99bc28d2df549d9d52f277 Update /<count>/ endpoints to use a '?count=' query parameter instead (stickies-v) a09497614e9bb603fff36286d9611a25b23eeb02 Add GetQueryParameter helper function (stickies-v) fff771ee864975cee8c831651239bac95503c37a Handle query string when parsing data format (stickies-v) c1aad1b3b95b7c6bdf05e0c2095aba2f2db8310b scripted-diff: rename RetFormat to RESTResponseFormat (stickies-v) 9f1c54787c81177dd56a31c881a9ad2834a122dc Refactoring: move declarations to rest.h (stickies-v) Pull request description: In RESTful APIs, [typically](https://rapidapi.com/blog/api-glossary/parameters/query/) path parameters (e.g. `/some/unique/resource/`) are used to represent resources, and query parameters (e.g. `?sort=asc`) are used to control how these resources are being loaded through e.g. sorting, pagination, filtering, ... As first [discussed in #17631](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17631#discussion_r733031180), the [current REST api](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/REST-interface.md) contains two endpoints `/headers/` and `/blockfilterheaders/` that rather unexpectedly use path parameters to control how many (filter) headers are returned in the response. While this is no critical issue, it is unintuitive and we are still early enough to easily phase this behaviour out and ensure new endpoints (if any) do not have to stick to non-standard behaviour just for internal consistency. In this PR, a new `HTTPRequest::GetQueryParameter` method is introduced to easily parse query parameters, as well as two new `/headers/` and `/blockfilterheaders/` endpoints that use a count query parameter are introduced. The old path parameter-based endpoints are kept without too much overhead, but the documentation now points to the new query parameter-based endpoints as the default interface to encourage standardness. ## Behaviour change ### New endpoints and default values `/headers/` and `/blockfilterheaders/` now have 2 new endpoints that contain query parameters (`?count=<count>`) instead of path parameters (`/<count>/`), as described in REST-interface.md. Since query parameters can easily have default values, I have set this at 5 for both endpoints. **headers** `GET /rest/headers/<BLOCK-HASH>.<bin|hex|json>?count=<COUNT=5>` should now be used instead of `GET /rest/headers/<COUNT>/<BLOCK-HASH>.<bin|hex|json>` **blockfilterheaders** `GET /rest/blockfilterheaders/<FILTERTYPE>/<BLOCK-HASH>.<bin|hex|json>?count=<COUNT=5>` should now be used instead of `GET /rest/blockfilterheaders/<FILTERTYPE>/<COUNT>/<BLOCK-HASH>.<bin|hex|json>` ### Some previously invalid API calls are now valid API calls that contained query strings in the URI could not be parsed prior to this PR. This PR changes behaviour in that previously invalid calls (e.g. `GET /rest/headers/5/somehash.json?someunusedparam=foo`) would now become valid, as the query parameters are properly parsed, and discarded if unused. For example, prior to this PR, adding an irrelevant `someparam` parameter would be illegal: ``` GET /rest/headers/5/0000004c6aad0c89c1c060e8e116dcd849e0554935cd78ff9c6a398abeac6eda.json?someparam=true -> Invalid hash: 0000004c6aad0c89c1c060e8e116dcd849e0554935cd78ff9c6a398abeac6eda.json?someparam=true ``` **This behaviour change affects all rest endpoints, not just the 2 new ones introduced here.** *(Note: I'd be open to implementing additional logic to refuse requests containing unrecognized query parameters to minimize behaviour change, but for the endpoints that we currently have I don't really see the point for that added complexity. E.g. I don't see any scenarios where misspelling a parameter could lead to harmful outcomes)* ## Using the REST API To run the API HTTP server, start a bitcoind instance with the `-rest` flag enabled. To use the `blockfilterheaders` endpoint, you'll also need to set `-blockfilterindex=1`: ``` ./bitcoind -signet -rest -blockfilterindex=1 ``` As soon as bitcoind is fully up and running, you should be able to query the API, for example by using curl on the command line: ```curl "127.0.0.1:38332/rest/chaininfo.json"```. To more easily parse the JSON output, you can also use tools like 'jq' or `json_pp`, e.g.: ``` curl -s "localhost:38332/rest/blockfilterheaders/basic/0000004c6aad0c89c1c060e8e116dcd849e0554935cd78ff9c6a398abeac6eda.json?count=2" | json_pp . ``` ## To do - [x] update `doc/release-notes` ## Feedback This is my first PR (hooray!). Please don't hold back on any feedback/comments/nits/... you may have, big or small, whether they are code, process, language, ... related. I welcome private messages too if there's anything you don't want to clutter the PR with. I'm here to learn and am grateful for everyone's input. ACKs for top commit: stickies-v: I've had to push a tiny doc update to `REST-interface.md` (`git range-diff 219d728 9aac438 54b39cf`) since this was not merged for v23, but since there are no significant changes beyond theStack and jnewbery's ACKs I think this PR is now ready to be considered for merging? @MarcoFalke jnewbery: ACK 54b39cfb342d10a448d49299c715e3a25c2aca4a theStack: re-ACK 54b39cfb342d10a448d49299c715e3a25c2aca4a Tree-SHA512: 3b393ffde34f25605ca12c0b1300799a19684b816a1d03aed38b0f5439df47bfe6a589ffbcd7b83fd2def6c9d00a1bae5e45b1d18df4ae998c617c709990f83f
2022-04-05Update /<count>/ endpoints to use a '?count=' query parameter insteadstickies-v
In most RESTful APIs, path parameters are used to represent resources, and query parameters are used to control how these resources are being filtered/sorted/... The old /<count>/ functionality is kept alive to maintain backwards compatibility, but new paths with query parameters are introduced and documented as the default interface so future API methods don't break consistency by using query parameters.
2022-03-30refactor: use named args when ScriptToUniv or TxToUniv are invokedMichael Dietz
2022-03-30refactor: merge ScriptPubKeyToUniv & ScriptToUniv into one functionMichael Dietz
2022-03-17Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24515: Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functionsMarcoFalke
f865cf8ded2b2fbc82a6fbc41226d991909a6880 Add and use BlockManager::GetAllBlockIndices (Carl Dong) 28ba0313eac37e4a900b7e97af7169ce999c4024 Add and use CBlockIndexHeightOnlyComparator (Carl Dong) 12eb05df63f930969115af6dc66e2e5d02f2a517 move-only: Move CBlockIndexWorkComparator to blockstorage (Carl Dong) c600ee38168a460d3026eae0e289c976194aad14 Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions (Carl Dong) 42e56d9b188f97c077ed2269e24acc0be35ece17 style-only: No need for std::pair for vSortedByHeight (Carl Dong) 3bbb6fea051f4e19bd2448e401a6c4e9b4cc7a41 style-only: Various blockstorage.cpp cleanups (Carl Dong) 5be9ee3c54dcb396ff52fc8c8b7e4e6e39ec4a3b refactor: more const annotations for uses of CBlockIndex* (Anthony Towns) Pull request description: The only important commit is "Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions", everything else is all just small style changes. Here's the commit message, reproduced: ``` This commit effectively splits the "load block index itself" logic from "derive Chainstate variables from loaded block index" logic. This means that BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex{,DB} will only load what's relevant to the BlockManager. ``` ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK f865cf8ded2b2fbc82a6fbc41226d991909a6880 ; code review only MarcoFalke: review ACK f865cf8ded2b2fbc82a6fbc41226d991909a6880 🗂 Tree-SHA512: 7b204d782834e06fd7329d022e2ae860181b4e8105c33bfb928539a4ec24161dc7438a9c4d4ee279dcad77de310c160b997bb8aa18923243d0fd55ccf4ad7c3a
2022-03-11rpc: Move mempool RPCs to new fileMarcoFalke
Can be reviewed with: --color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space
2022-03-10Handle query string when parsing data formatstickies-v
URLs may contain a query string (prefixed with '?') and this should be ignored when parsing the data format. To facilitate testing this functionality, ParseDataFormat has been made non-static.
2022-03-10scripted-diff: rename RetFormat to RESTResponseFormatstickies-v
As RetFormat is now exposed in a header, it is renamed to the more understandable RESTResponseFormat -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- s() { sed -i 's/RetFormat/RESTResponseFormat/g' $1; } s src/rest.cpp s src/rest.h -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2022-03-10Refactoring: move declarations to rest.hstickies-v
This facilitates unit testing
2022-03-09refactor: more const annotations for uses of CBlockIndex*Anthony Towns
2022-01-06Add src/node/* code to node:: namespaceRussell Yanofsky
2022-01-02Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23836: rest: Expose block filters follow-upsfanquake
4523d28b6bd550bf9f9c724f9aa90c3d2d4ebe3b [test] compare filter and header with the result of the getblockfilter RPC (Niklas Gögge) 3a2464f21619c3065ec2f5d8f7431703c30c964a [rest] drop superfluous rpc serializations flags for block filters (Niklas Gögge) 064abd14a55e0fa1bff530237816a748d01e0ddb [rest] add a more verbose error message for invalid header counts (Niklas Gögge) 83b8f3a8961baa34a136ecfaf62c3ea0d133b6d6 [refactor] various style fix-ups (Niklas Gögge) Pull request description: This PR addresses unresolved review comments from [#17631](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17631). This includes: * various style fix-ups * returning a more verbose error message for invalid header counts * removing superfluous rpc serializations flags for block filters * improving the test to include comparing the block filters returned from the rest with the ones returned from the `getblockfilter` RPC. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: ACK 4523d28b6bd550bf9f9c724f9aa90c3d2d4ebe3b brunoerg: tACK 4523d28b6bd550bf9f9c724f9aa90c3d2d4ebe3b Tree-SHA512: 634e6b2ae3e1d5f31675a50cfe11a5e74bf5a51b9e7b512d9e18879bf2ed424fc0ac6ec633023f192e3ad12cf0c73b0b51de79dd7ec00844dba3e1493d823b8c
2021-12-30scripted-diff: Bump copyright headersHennadii Stepanov
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- ./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./ -END VERIFY SCRIPT- Commits of previous years: * 2020: fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db * 2019: aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
2021-12-22[rest] drop superfluous rpc serializations flags for block filtersNiklas Gögge
2021-12-22[rest] add a more verbose error message for invalid header countsNiklas Gögge
2021-12-22[refactor] various style fix-upsNiklas Gögge
2021-12-20Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#17631: Expose block filters over RESTMarcoFalke
2b64fa3251ac5ff4b4d174f1f0be7226490dce87 Update REST docs with new accessors (Matt Corallo) ef7c8228fd5cf45526518ae2bd5ebdd483e65525 Expose block filters over REST. (Matt Corallo) Pull request description: This adds a new rest endpoint: /rest/blockfilter/filtertype/requesttype/blockhash (eg /rest/blockfilter/basic/header/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f.hex) which exposes either the filter "header" or the filter data itself. Most of the code is cribbed from the equivalent RPC. You can test it at http://bitcoin-rest.bitcoin.ninja/rest//blockfilter/basic/header/000000005b7a58a939b2636f61fa4ddd62258c5fed57667a35d23f2334c4f86d.hex ACKs for top commit: dergoegge: ACK 2b64fa3251ac5ff4b4d174f1f0be7226490dce87 - Adding blockfilters to the REST interface is analogous to serving other public data such as transactions or blocks. Tree-SHA512: d487bc694266375c94d6fcf2e9d788a8a42a3b94e8d3290e46335a64cbcde55084ce5ea6119b79a4065888d94d7c3ae25a59a901fa46e3711f0eb296add12696
2021-12-02rpc: move Ensure* helpers to server_util.hSjors Provoost
2021-10-19Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22918: rpc: Add level 3 verbosity to getblock RPC call ↵W. J. van der Laan
(#21245 modified) 5c34507ecbbdc29c086276d1c62835b461823507 core_write: Rename calculate_fee to have_undo for clarity (fyquah) 8edf6204a87057a451160d1e61e79d8be112e81f release-notes: Add release note about getblock verbosity level 3. (fyquah) 459104b2aae6eeaadfa5a7e47944f1a34780dacd rest: Add test for prevout fields in getblock (fyquah) 4330af6f72172848f5971a052a8f325ed50eb576 rpc: Add test for level 3 verbosity getblock rpc call. (fyquah) 51dbc167e98daab317baa80cf80bfda337672dab rpc: Add level 3 verbosity to getblock RPC call. (fyquah) 3cc95345ca49b87e8caca9a0e6418c63ae1e463a rpc: Replace boolean argument for tx details with enum class. (fyquah) Pull request description: Author of #21245 expressed [time issues](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21245#issuecomment-902332088) in the original PR. Given that #21245 has received a lot of review*, I have decided to open this new pull request with [modifications required to get ACK from luke-jr ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21245#issuecomment-905150806) and a few nits of mine. ### Original PR description > Display the prevout in transaction inputs when calling getblock level 3 verbosity. This PR affects the existing `/rest/block` API by adding a `prevout` fields to tx inputs. This is mentioned in the change to the release notes. > > I added some functional tests that > > * checks that the RPC call still works when TxUndo can't be found > > * Doesn't display the "value" or "scriptPubKey" of the previous output when at a lower verbosity level > > > This "completes" the issue #18771 ### Possible improvements * https://github.com/kiminuo/bitcoin/commit/b0bf4f255f86aeaddce68889087c22f9068f4d97 - I can include even this commit to this PR if deemed useful or I can leave it for a follow-up PR. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21245#issuecomment-894853784 for more context. ### Examples Examples of the `getblock` output with various verbose levels. Note that `000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5` contains only 2 transactions. #### Verbose level 0 ```bash ./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 0 ``` ##### Verbose level 1 ```bash ./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 1 ``` ##### Verbose level 2 ```bash ./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 2 ``` ##### Verbose level 3 ```bash ./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 3 ``` #### REST ```bash curl -H "content-type:text/plain;" http://127.0.0.1:18332/rest/block/000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5.json ``` <sub>* ... and my everyday obsessive checking of my email inbox whether the PR moves forward.</sub> Edit laanwj: Removed at symbol from message, and large example output to prevent it from all ending up in the commit message. ACKs for top commit: 0xB10C: ACK 5c34507ecbbdc29c086276d1c62835b461823507 meshcollider: utACK 5c34507ecbbdc29c086276d1c62835b461823507 theStack: ACK 5c34507ecbbdc29c086276d1c62835b461823507 👘 promag: Concept ACK 5c34507ecbbdc29c086276d1c62835b461823507 Tree-SHA512: bbff120d8fd76e617b723b102b0c606e0d8eb27f21c631d5f4cdab0892137c4bc7c65b1df144993405f942c91be47a26e80480102af55bff22621c19f518aea3
2021-10-17Expose block filters over REST.Matt Corallo
This adds a new rest endpoint: /rest/blockfilter/filtertype/requesttype/blockhash (eg /rest/blockfilter/basic/header/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f.hex) which exposes either the filter "header" or the filter data itself. Most of the code is cribbed from the equivalent RPC.
2021-10-12rest: Return error when header count is not integralMarcoFalke
2021-10-05rpc: Add level 3 verbosity to getblock RPC call.fyquah
Display the prevout in transaction inputs when calling getblock level 3 verbosity. Co-authored-by: Luke Dashjr <luke_github1@dashjr.org> Co-authored-by: 0xB10C <19157360+0xB10C@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-05rpc: Replace boolean argument for tx details with enum class.fyquah
Co-authored-by: Luke Dashjr <luke_github1@dashjr.org> Co-authored-by: 0xB10C <19157360+0xB10C@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-07-05Use C++17 [[fallthrough]] attribute, and drop -Wno-implicit-fallthroughHennadii Stepanov
2021-06-10validation: Farewell, global Chainstate!Carl Dong
2021-05-27rest: Add GetChainman function and use itCarl Dong
This is not the cleanest change but: 1. It fixes the erroneous use of RPC's Ensure*() in rest.cpp, which cause crashes in REST contexts. RPC code wraps all calls in a try/except, REST code does not. Ensure*(), being part of RPC, expects that its throw's will get caught by a try/except. But if you use Ensure*() in REST code, since it doesn't have a try/except wrap, a crash will happen. 2. It is consistent with other functions like GetMemPool. Someone can probably make this a bit prettier.
2021-04-17Merge #21391: [Bundle 5/n] Prune g_chainman usage in RPC modulesMarcoFalke
586190f0b4740457cb86cba632e3d64e6dfe9b0c rpc/rest: Take and reuse local Chain/ChainState obj (Carl Dong) bc3bd369027273278a0541f3b991eb71de831aa2 rpc: style: Improve BuriedForkDescPushBack signature (Carl Dong) f99913969f92b8b9cef1b83f5ee8e6a9267b4af0 rpc: Remove unnecessary casting of block height (Carl Dong) 6a3d1920209cded0dae52fb9070a3530d9a4e5fd rpc: Tidy up local references (see commit message) (Carl Dong) 038854f31e3511e8bb6e163305cab0a96783d25b rest/rpc: Remove now-unused old Ensure functions (Carl Dong) 6fb65b49f4d393b091479be5a5df5a0a160cf986 scripted-diff: rest/rpc: Use renamed EnsureAny*() (Carl Dong) 1570c7ee98612366df031bebef9e0468fb57b8a2 rpc: Add renamed EnsureAny*() functions (Carl Dong) 306b1cd3eeb2502904ed4698646d2c86d028aad2 rpc: Add alt Ensure* functions acepting NodeContext (Carl Dong) d7824acdb9b18fe8f151771a83ccae1681f16c66 rest: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong) 3f0893479908ca28d6127c8d0ada30737cb830be rest: Pass in NodeContext to rest_block (Carl Dong) 7be0671b950842fc3a17641a4a21501de0a800b5 rpc/rawtx: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong) 60dc05afc6f6388c6f86729a0edd7cb69f1748e0 rpc/mining: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong) d485e815e2b62dc74a485569d08130dc3ef9ff63 rpc/blockchain: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong) d0abf0bf429586e3a5b4c3231fe430dc29695481 rpc/*,rest: Add review-only assertion to EnsureChainman (Carl Dong) cced0f46c9133e0fc6211e987421ad1d9be1a399 miner: Pass in previous CBlockIndex to RegenerateCommitments (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Overall PR: #20158 (tree-wide: De-globalize ChainstateManager) Based on: - [x] #21270 | [Bundle 4/n] Prune g_chainman usage in validation-adjacent modules - [x] #21525 | [Bundle 4.5/n] Followup fixups to bundle 4 Note to reviewers: 1. This bundle may _apparently_ introduce usage of `g_chainman` or `::Chain(state|)Active()` globals, but these are resolved later on in the overall PR. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits) 2. There may be seemingly obvious local references to `ChainstateManager` or other validation objects which are not being used in callers of the current function in question, this is done intentionally to **_keep each commit centered around one function/method_** to ease review and to make the overall change systematic. We don't assume anything about our callers. Rest assured that once we are considering that particular caller in later commits, we will use the obvious local references. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits) 3. When changing a function/method that has many callers (e.g. `LookupBlockIndex` with 55 callers), it is sometimes easier (and less error-prone) to use a scripted-diff. When doing so, there will be 3 commits in sequence so that every commit compiles like so: 1. Add `new_function`, make `old_function` a wrapper of `new_function`, divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the local module only** 2. Scripted-diff to divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the rest of the codebase** 3. Remove `old_function` ACKs for top commit: ryanofsky: Code review ACK 586190f0b4740457cb86cba632e3d64e6dfe9b0c. Since last review, no changes to existing commits, just some simple new commits added: three new commits renaming std::any Ensure functions (scripted diff commit and manual pre/post commits), and one new commit factoring out a repeated `ActiveChain()` call made in a loop. Thanks for the updates! jnewbery: utACK 586190f0b4740457cb86cba632e3d64e6dfe9b0c MarcoFalke: review ACK 586190f0b4740457cb86cba632e3d64e6dfe9b0c 🍯 Tree-SHA512: 64b677fb50141805b55c3f1afe68fcd298f9a071a359bdcd63256d52e334f83e462f31fb3ebee9b630da8f1d912a03a128cfc38179e7aaec29a055744a98478c
2021-04-14rpc/rest: Take and reuse local Chain/ChainState objCarl Dong
In all rest/rpc-related modules, if there are multiple calls to ActiveChain{,State}(), and the calls fall under the same ::cs_main lock, we can simply take a local reference and use/reuse it instead of calling ActiveChain{,State}() again and again.
2021-04-14rpc: Tidy up local references (see commit message)Carl Dong
Organize local variables/references such that: 1. There is always a `ChainstateManager` reference before any `LOCK(cs_main)`. 2. NodeContext references are used with Ensure*() functions introduced in previous commit where appropriate to avoid duplicate assertions.
2021-04-14scripted-diff: rest/rpc: Use renamed EnsureAny*()Carl Dong
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i -E 's@Ensure([^(]+)(\((request\.|)context\))@EnsureAny\1\2@g' \ -- src/rest.cpp src/rpc/*.cpp -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2021-04-13Merge #21575: refactor: Create blockstorage modulefanquake
fadcd3f78e1dd1acd7a774f8fad68dc471ff9e1f doc: Remove irrelevant link to GitHub (MarcoFalke) fa121b628d51bb0e25eb3fbd716881fa55527dc7 blockstorage: [refactor] Use chainman reference where possible (MarcoFalke) fa0c7d9ad24d3c9515d3f9c136af4071cbd79055 move-only: Move *Disk functions to blockstorage (MarcoFalke) fa91b2b2b3447a3645e7958c7dc4e1946a69cb9c move-only: Move AbortNode to shutdown (MarcoFalke) fa413f07a14744e7d7f7746e861aabd9cf938f61 move-only: Move ThreadImport to blockstorage (MarcoFalke) faf843c07f99f91603e08ea858f972516f1d669a refactor: Move load block thread into ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This picks up the closed pull request #21030 and is the first step toward fixing #21220. The basic idea is to move all disk access into a separate module with benefits: * Breaking down the massive files init.cpp and validation.cpp into logical units * Creating a standalone-module to reduce the mental complexity * Pave the way to fix validation related circular dependencies * Pave the way to mock disk access for testing, especially where it is performance critical (like fuzzing) ACKs for top commit: promag: Code review ACK fadcd3f78e, checked (almost) moved only changes. This is a nice tidy up change and doesn't change behavior. Easily reviewed commit by commit. jamesob: ACK fadcd3f78e1dd1acd7a774f8fad68dc471ff9e1f ([`jamesob/ackr/21575.1.MarcoFalke.refactor_create_blocksto`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21575.1.MarcoFalke.refactor_create_blocksto)) ryanofsky: Code review ACK fadcd3f78e1dd1acd7a774f8fad68dc471ff9e1f. New organization makes sense, moves extraneous things outside of validation.cpp. PR is also easy to review with helpfully split up moveonly commits. Tree-SHA512: 917996592b6d8f9998289d8cb2b1b78b23d1fdb3b07216c9caec1380df33baa09dc2c1e706da669d440b497e79c9c62a01ca20dc202df5ad974a75f3ef7a143b
2021-04-07Drop JSONRPCRequest constructors after #21366Russell Yanofsky
This just makes an additional simplification after #21366 replaced util::Ref with std::any. It was originally suggested https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21366#issuecomment-792044351 but delayed for a followup. It would have prevented usage bug https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21572.
2021-04-05move-only: Move *Disk functions to blockstorageMarcoFalke
Can be reviewed with the git options --color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space
2021-04-05rest: Use existing NodeContextCarl Dong
2021-04-05rest: Pass in NodeContext to rest_blockCarl Dong
2021-03-29refactor: replace util::Ref by std::any (C++17)Sebastian Falbesoner
2021-02-18Merge #20429: refactor: replace (sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0])) with C++17 std::sizeMarcoFalke
e829c9afbf75e930db6c3fe77a269b0af5e7a3ad refactor: replace sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) by std::size (C++17) (Sebastian Falbesoner) 365539c84691d470b44d35df374d8c049f8c1192 refactor: init vectors via std::{begin,end} to avoid pointer arithmetic (Sebastian Falbesoner) 63d4ee1968144cc3d115f92baef95785abf813ac refactor: iterate arrays via C++11 range-based for loops if idx is not needed (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This refactoring PR picks up the idea of #19626 and replaces all occurences of `sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0])` (or `sizeof(x)/sizeof(*x)`, respectively) with the now-available C++17 [`std::size`](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/iterator/size) (as [suggested by sipa](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19626#issuecomment-666487228)), making the macro `ARRAYLEN` obsolete. As preparation for this, two other changes are done to eliminate `sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0])` usage: * all places where arrays are iterated via an index are changed to use C++11 range-based for loops If the index' only purpose is to access the array element (as [suggested by MarcoFalke](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19626#discussion_r463404541)). * `std::vector` initializations are done via `std::begin` and `std::end` rather than using pointer arithmetic to calculate the end (also [suggested by MarcoFalke](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20429#discussion_r567418821)). ACKs for top commit: practicalswift: cr ACK e829c9afbf75e930db6c3fe77a269b0af5e7a3ad: patch looks correct fanquake: ACK e829c9afbf75e930db6c3fe77a269b0af5e7a3ad MarcoFalke: review ACK e829c9afbf75e930db6c3fe77a269b0af5e7a3ad 🌩 Tree-SHA512: b01d32c04b9e04d562b7717cae00a651ec9a718645047a90761be6959e0cc2adbd67494e058fe894641076711bb09c3b47a047d0275c736f0b2218e1ce0d193d
2021-01-31refactor: iterate arrays via C++11 range-based for loops if idx is not neededSebastian Falbesoner
2021-01-28scripted-diff: Use BlockManager::LookupBlockIndexCarl Dong
[META] In a previous commit, we moved ::LookupBlockIndex to become a member function of BlockManager. This commit is split out from that one since it can be expressed nicely as a scripted-diff. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- find_regex='LookupBlockIndex' \ && git grep -l -E "$find_regex" -- src \ | grep -v '^src/validation\.\(cpp\|h\)$' \ | xargs sed -i -E "s@${find_regex}@g_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex@g" -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2020-12-31scripted-diff: Bump copyright headersMarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- ./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./ -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2020-09-22Merge #19849: Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones ↵MarcoFalke
(blockchain,rawtransaction) fa6bb0ce5dba33970e2c1e47ea4d0d2c0718eccb Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (rawtransaction) (MarcoFalke) fa80c814874a2893e4323ba5148fba21d7f421cd Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (blockchain) (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This is split out from #18531 to just touch some RPC methods. Description from the main pr: ### Motivation RPCArg names in the rpc help are currently only used for documentation. However, in the future they could be used to teach the server the named arguments. Named arguments are currently registered by the `CRPCCommand`s and duplicate the RPCArg names from the documentation. This redundancy is fragile, and has lead to errors in the past (despite having linters to catch those kind of errors). See section "bugs found" for a list of bugs that have been found as a result of the changes here. ### Changes The changes here add an assert in the `CRPCCommand` constructor that the RPCArg names are identical to the ones in the `CRPCCommand`. ### Future work > Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue? Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including: * Removing the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant * Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table * Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan * Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks * Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation * Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static ### Bugs found * The assert identified issue #18607 * The changes itself fixed bug #19250 ACKs for top commit: fjahr: utACK fa6bb0ce5dba33970e2c1e47ea4d0d2c0718eccb tryphe: utACK fa6bb0ce5dba33970e2c1e47ea4d0d2c0718eccb. Reducing data duplication is nice. Code changes are minimal and concise. Tree-SHA512: deb0edc3f999baf055526eaa199b98c500635e12502dece7aa3cad5319db330eb5ee7459a5c8f040a83671a7f20c560c19a2026fb76c8416f138aa332727cbce
2020-09-05Remove mempool globalMarcoFalke
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-07-05 13:38:52 +0000