| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This is a refactor, putting the burden to think about thread safety to
the caller. Otherwise, there is a risk that the caller will assume
thread safety where none exists, as is evident in the previous two
commits.
|
|
sync when a block is found
f6a916683d75ed5489666dbfbd711f000ad0707f Add functional test for block announcements during initial headers sync (Suhas Daftuar)
05f7f31598b8bb06acb12e1e2a3ccf324b035ea8 Reduce bandwidth during initial headers sync when a block is found (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
On startup, if our headers chain is more than a day behind current time, we'll pick one peer to sync headers with until our best headers chain is caught up (at that point, we'll try to sync headers with all peers).
However, if an INV for a block is received before our headers chain is caught up, we'll then start to sync headers from each peer announcing the block. This can result in doing a big headers sync with many (if not all) of our peers simultaneously, which wastes bandwidth.
This PR would reduce that overhead by picking (at most) one new peer to try syncing headers with whenever a new block is announced, prior to our headers chain being caught up.
ACKs for top commit:
LarryRuane:
ACK f6a916683d75ed5489666dbfbd711f000ad0707f
ajtowns:
ACK f6a916683d75ed5489666dbfbd711f000ad0707f
mzumsande:
ACK f6a916683d75ed5489666dbfbd711f000ad0707f
dergoegge:
Code review ACK f6a916683d75ed5489666dbfbd711f000ad0707f
achow101:
ACK f6a916683d75ed5489666dbfbd711f000ad0707f
Tree-SHA512: 0662000bd68db146f55981de4adc2e2b07cbfda222b1176569d61c22055e5556752ffd648426f69687ed1cc203105515e7304c12b915d6270df8e41a4a0e1eaa
|
|
If our headers chain is behind on startup, then if a block is found we'll try
to catch up from all peers announcing the block, in addition to our initial
headers-sync peer. This commit changes behavior so that in this situation,
we'll choose at most one peer announcing a block to additionally sync headers
from.
|
|
network time
fadd8b2676f6d68ec87189871461c9a6a6aa3cac addrman: Use system time instead of adjusted network time (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This changes addrman to use system time for address relay instead of the network adjusted time.
This is an improvement, because network time has multiple issues:
* It is non-monotonic, even if the system time is monotonic.
* It may be wrong, even if the system time is correct.
* It may be wrong, if the system time is wrong. For example, when the node has limited number of connections (`4`), or the system time is wrong by too much (more than +-70 minutes), or the system time only got wrong after timedata collected more than half of the entries while the time was correct, ...)
This may slightly degrade addr relay for nodes where timedata successfully adjusted the time. Addr relay can already deal with minor offsets of up to 10 minutes. Offsets larger than this should still allow addr relay and not result in a DoS.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
Code review ACK fadd8b2676f6d68ec87189871461c9a6a6aa3cac
Tree-SHA512: b6c178fa01161544e5bc76c4cb23e11bcc30391f7b7a64accce864923766647bcfce2e8ae21d36fb1ffc1afa07bc46415aca612405bd8d4cc1f319c92a08498f
|
|
|
|
|
|
`LimitOrphans` then return void
b4b657ba57a2ce31b3c21ea9245aad26d5b06a57 refactor: log `nEvicted` message in `LimitOrphans` then return void (chinggg)
Pull request description:
Fix https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=49347
LimitOrphans() can log expired tx and it should log evicted tx as well instead of returning the `nEvicted` number for caller to print the message.
Since `LimitOrphans()` now returns void, the redundant assertion check in fuzz test is also removed.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 18c41702321b0e59812590cd389f3163831d431f4ebdc3b3e1e0698496a6bdbac52288f28f779237a58813c6717da1a35e8933d509822978ff726c1b13cfc778
|
|
`LimitOrphans()` can log expired tx and it should log evicted tx as well
instead of returning the number for caller to print the message.
Since `LimitOrphans()` now return void, the redundant assertion check in
fuzz test is also removed.
|
|
|
|
Also, fix includes.
The getter will be used in a future commit.
|
|
CNode::nLocalServices to Peer
8d8eeb422e64ccd08bce92eed2ee9cbbf55ffd67 [net processing] Remove CNode::nLocalServices (John Newbery)
5961f8eea1ad5be1a4bf8da63651e197a20359b2 [net] Return CService from GetLocalAddrForPeer and GetLocalAddress (dergoegge)
d9079fe18dc5d81ce290876353555b51125127d1 [net processing] Remove CNode::nServices (John Newbery)
7d1c0369340cb752f0d78e24f4251595534bf5e9 [net processing] Replace fHaveWitness with CanServeWitnesses() (John Newbery)
f65e83d51bfb6a34f1d5efccfb3d8786a51a4534 [net processing] Remove fClient and m_limited_node (John Newbery)
fc5eb528f7d7b33e2f2e443c5610a1551c7f099b [tests] Connect peer in outbound_slow_chain_eviction by sending p2p messages (John Newbery)
1f52c47d5c09b59fd3153700751c74e63edc7d7e [net processing] Add m_our_services and m_their_services to Peer (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Another step in #19398. Which services we offer to a peer and which services they offer to us is application layer data and should not be stored on `CNode`.
This is also a prerequisite for adding `PeerManager` unit tests (See #25515).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 8d8eeb422e64ccd08bce92eed2ee9cbbf55ffd67 🔑
jnewbery:
utACK 8d8eeb422e64ccd08bce92eed2ee9cbbf55ffd67
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 8d8eeb422e64ccd08bce92eed2ee9cbbf55ffd67
Tree-SHA512: e772eb2a0a85db346dd7b453a41011a12756fc7cbfda6a9ef6daa9633b9a47b9770ab3dc02377690f9d02127301c3905ff22905977f758bf90b17a9a35b37523
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use Peer::m_their_services instead
|
|
|
|
fClient is replaced by CanServeBlocks(), and m_limited_node is replaced
by IsLimitedPeer().
|
|
Track services offered by us and the peer in the Peer object.
|
|
This variable is only used in a single thread, so no atomic or mutex is
necessary to guard it.
|
|
flight to the same peer
99f4785cad94657dcf349d00fdd6f1d44cac9bb0 Replace GetTime() with NodeClock in MaybeSendGetHeaders() (Suhas Daftuar)
abf5d16c24cb08b0451bdbd4d1de63a12930e8f5 Don't send getheaders message when another request is outstanding (Suhas Daftuar)
ffe87db247b19ffb8bfba329c5dd0be39ef5a53f Cleanup received_new_header calculation to use WITH_LOCK (Suhas Daftuar)
6d95cd3e7444ebaaabb64a76783ea3551530f1d7 Move peer state updates from headers message into separate function (Suhas Daftuar)
2b341db731793844f12944363186edea23eabdeb Move headers direct fetch to end of ProcessHeadersMessage (Suhas Daftuar)
29c45185223441943ab610e62937a118c7c3a5b2 Move headers-direct-fetch logic into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
bf8ea6df75749c27f753b562c4724b3f8d263ad4 Move additional headers fetching to own function (Suhas Daftuar)
9492e93bf9f4a841bf43ca4b593871c0863d5b63 Add helper function for checking header continuity (Suhas Daftuar)
7f2450871b3ea0b4d02d56bd2ca365fcc25cf90e Move handling of unconnecting headers into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Change `getheaders` messages so that we wait up to 2 minutes for a response to a prior `getheaders` message before issuing a new one.
Also change the handling of the `getheaders` message sent in response to a block INV, so that we no longer use the hashstop variable (including the hash stop will just mean that if our peer's headers chain is longer, then we won't learn
it, so there's no benefit to using hashstop).
Also, now respond to a `getheaders` during IBD with an empty headers message (rather than nothing) -- this better conforms to the intent of the new logic that it's better to not ignore a peer's `getheaders` message, even if you have nothing to give. This also avoids a lot of functional tests breaking.
This PR also reworks the headers processing logic to make it more readable.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 99f4785cad94657dcf349d00fdd6f1d44cac9bb0 ; code review, check over new logic of when to send getheaders messages
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 99f4785cad94657dcf349d00fdd6f1d44cac9bb0
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 99f4785cad94657dcf349d00fdd6f1d44cac9bb0
sipa:
utACK 99f4785cad94657dcf349d00fdd6f1d44cac9bb0
w0xlt:
tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25454/commits/99f4785cad94657dcf349d00fdd6f1d44cac9bb0 Good improvement in the code.
Tree-SHA512: b8a63f6f71ac83e292edc0200def7835ad8b06b2955dd34e3ea6fac85980fa6962efd31d689ef5ea121ff5477ec14aafa4bbe2d0db134c05f4a31a57a8ced365
|
|
|
|
`ArgsManager`
d1684beabe5b738c2cc83de83e1aaef11a761b69 fees: Pass in a filepath instead of referencing gArgs (Carl Dong)
9a3d825c30e8e6118d74a4e568744cb9d03f7f5d init: Remove redundant -*mempool*, -limit* queries (Carl Dong)
6c5c60c4124293d948735756f84efc85262ea66f mempool: Use m_limit for UpdateTransactionsFromBlock (Carl Dong)
9e93b1030182eff92ef91181e17c7dd498c7e164 node/ifaces: Use existing MemPoolLimits (Carl Dong)
38af2bcf358a72b9457d370282e57f4be1c5c849 mempoolaccept: Use limits from mempool in constructor (Carl Dong)
9333427014695ac235c96d48791098168dfdc9db mempool: Introduce (still-unused) MemPoolLimits (Carl Dong)
716bb5fbd31077bbe99d11a54d6c2c250afc8085 scripted-diff: Rename anc/desc size limit vars to indicate SI unit (Carl Dong)
1ecc77321deb61b9f6888e4e10752b9d972fd26e scripted-diff: Rename DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY to indicate time unit (Carl Dong)
aa9141cd8185cb7ad532bc16feb9d302b05d9697 mempool: Pass in -mempoolexpiry instead of referencing gArgs (Carl Dong)
51c7a41a5eb6fcb60333812c770d80227cf7b64d init: Only determine maxmempool once (Carl Dong)
386c9472c8764738282e6d163b42e15a8feda7ea mempool: Make GetMinFee() with custom size protected (Carl Dong)
82f00de7a6a60cbc9ad0c6e1d0ffb1bc70c49af5 mempool: Pass in -maxmempool instead of referencing gArgs (Carl Dong)
f1941e8bfd2eecc478c7660434b1ebf6a64095a0 pool: Add and use MemPoolOptions, ApplyArgsManOptions (Carl Dong)
0199bd35bb44e32ee0db9b51c9d1bd7518c26f19 fuzz/rbf: Add missing TestingSetup (Carl Dong)
ccbaf546a68d6cda8ed3efd0598c0e4121b366bb scripted-diff: Rename DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE to indicate SI unit (Carl Dong)
fc02f77ca604f0221171bfde3059b34f5d0fb1cd ArgsMan: Add Get*Arg functions returning optional (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project: #24303, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18
-----
As mentioned in the Stage 1 Step 2 description of [the `libbitcoinkernel` project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24303), `ArgsManager` will not be part of `libbitcoinkernel`. Therefore, it is important that we remove any dependence on `ArgsManager` by code that will be part of `libbitcoinkernel`. This is the first in a series of PRs aiming to achieve this.
This PR removes `CTxMemPool+MempoolAccept`'s dependency on `ArgsManager` by introducing a `CTxMemPool::Options` struct, which is used to specify `CTxMemPool`'s various options at construction time.
These options are:
- `-maxmempool` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::max_size`
- `-mempoolexpiry` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::expiry`
- `-limitancestorcount` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::limits::ancestor_count`
- `-limitancestorsize` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::limits::ancestor_size`
- `-limitdescendantcount` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::limits::descendant_count`
- `-limitdescendantsize` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::limits::descendant_size`
More context can be gleaned from the commit messages. The important commits are:
- 56eb479ded8bfb2ef635bb6f3b484f9d5952c70d "pool: Add and use MemPoolOptions, ApplyArgsManOptions"
- a1e08b70f3068f4e8def1c630d8f50cd54da7832 "mempool: Pass in -maxmempool instead of referencing gArgs"
- 6f4bf3ede5812b374828f08fc728ceded2f10024 "mempool: Pass in -mempoolexpiry instead of referencing gArgs"
- 5958a7fe4806599fc620ee8c1a881ca10fa2dd16 "mempool: Introduce (still-unused) MemPoolLimits"
Reviewers: Help needed in the following commits (see commit messages):
- a1e08b70f3068f4e8def1c630d8f50cd54da7832 "mempool: Pass in -maxmempool instead of referencing gArgs"
- 0695081a797e9a5d7787b78b0f8289dafcc6bff7 "node/ifaces: Use existing MemPoolLimits"
Note to Reviewers: There are perhaps an infinite number of ways to architect `CTxMemPool::Options`, the current one tries to keep it simple, usable, and flexible. I hope we don't spend too much time arguing over the design here since that's not the point. In the case that you're 100% certain that a different design is strictly better than this one in every regard, please show us a fully-implemented branch.
-----
TODO:
- [x] Use the more ergonomic `CTxMemPool::Options` where appropriate
- [x] Doxygen comments for `ApplyArgsManOptions`, `MemPoolOptions`
-----
Questions for Reviewers:
1. Should we use `std::chrono::seconds` for `CTxMemPool::Options::expiry` and `CTxMemPool::m_expiry` instead of an `int64_t`? Something else? (`std::chrono::hours`?)
2. Should I merge `CTxMemPool::Limits` inside `CTxMemPool::Options`?
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK d1684beabe5b738c2cc83de83e1aaef11a761b69 🍜
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d1684beabe5b738c2cc83de83e1aaef11a761b69. Just minor cleanups since last review, mostly switching to brace initialization
Tree-SHA512: 2c138e52d69f61c263f1c3648f01c801338a8f576762c815f478ef5148b8b2f51e91ded5c1be915e678c0b14f6cfba894b82afec58d999d39a7bb7c914736e0b
|
|
Change getheaders messages so that we wait up to 2 minutes for a response to a
prior getheaders message before issuing a new one.
Also change the handling of the getheaders message sent in response to a block
INV, so that we no longer use the hashstop variable (including the hash stop
will just mean that if our peer's headers chain is longer, then we won't learn
it, so there's no benefit to using hashstop).
Also, now respond to a getheaders during IBD with an empty headers message
(rather than nothing) -- this better conforms to the intent of the new logic
that it's better to not ignore a peer's getheaders message, even if you have
nothing to give. This also avoids a lot of functional tests breaking.
p2p_segwit.py is modified to use this same strategy, as the test logic (of
expecting a getheaders after a block inv) would otherwise be broken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also moves the call to happen directly after validation of a headers message
(rather than mixed in with other state updates for the peer), and removes an
incorrect comment in favor of one that explains why headers sync must continue
from the last header a peer has sent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Store the mempool size limit (-maxmempool) in CTxMemPool as a member.
- Remove the requirement to explicitly specify a mempool size limit for
CTxMemPool::GetMinFee(...) and LimitMempoolSize(...), just use the
stored mempool size limit where possible.
- Remove all now-unnecessary instances of:
gArgs.GetIntArg("-maxmempool", DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE_MB) * 1000000
The code change in CChainState::GetCoinsCacheSizeState() is correct
since the coinscache should not repurpose "extra" mempool memory
headroom for itself if the mempool doesn't even exist.
|
|
Ticks<SecondsDouble>
fa956e7508986991008e2f6126ab307924b3f353 Replace CountSecondsDouble with Ticks<SecondsDouble> (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to have two ways to say exactly the same thing when one is sufficient.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa956e7508986991008e2f6126ab307924b3f353
shaavan:
ACK fa956e7508986991008e2f6126ab307924b3f353
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25480/commits/fa956e7508986991008e2f6126ab307924b3f353
Tree-SHA512: b599470e19b693da1ed1102d1e86b08cb03adaddf2048752b6d050fdf86055be117ff0ae10b6953d03e00eaaf7b0cfa350137968b67d6c5b3ca68c5aa50ca6aa
|
|
e357c8953880715a943b892deed04e7777187999 p2p, doc: Use MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE consistently (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Block announcements via headers may have up to `MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE = 8` entries according to the definition of this constant.
However, there are a few spots saying they should have a size _less than_ `MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE`. Fix these.
I don't think that this is critical (this only changes behavior when we get a headers announcement with exactly `MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE` blocks which we can't connect), but it would be nice to handle this limit consistently.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
utACK e357c8953880715a943b892deed04e7777187999 - This PR makes the usage and docs of `MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE` consistent with its description.
Tree-SHA512: f3772026ab0f402e3a551127ef6e4a98fa9e7af250715fe317c05988b5b33f2f3e098a00e03960d4d28c8bd2b7a97231f7f99f22f1c152c000b2e27b658cf8f2
|
|
fa8aa0aa8180c3a0369c7589b8747666778a0deb Pass Peer& to Misbehaving() (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
`Misbehaving` has several coding related issues (ignoring the conceptual issues here for now):
* It is public, but it is not supposed to be called from outside of net_processing. Fix that by making it private and creating a public `UnitTestMisbehaving` method for unit testing only.
* It doesn't do anything if a `nullptr` is passed. It would be less confusing to just skip the call instead. Fix that by passing `Peer&` to `Misbehaving()`.
* It calls `GetPeerRef`, causing `!m_peer_mutex` lock annotations to be propagated. This is harmless, but verbose. Fix it by removing the no longer needed call to `GetPeerRef` and the no longer needed lock annotations.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK fa8aa0aa8180c3a0369c7589b8747666778a0deb
w0xlt:
Code Review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25144/commits/fa8aa0aa8180c3a0369c7589b8747666778a0deb
Tree-SHA512: e60a6b317f2b826f9e0724285d00b632d3e2a91ded9fa5ba01c80766c5d39270b719be234c01302d46eaba600910032693836aa116ff05ee1b590c7530881cd3
|
|
|
|
Better to be explicit when it comes to sizes to avoid unintentional
bugs. We use MB and KB all over the place.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
find_regex="DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE" \
&& git grep -l -E "$find_regex" \
| xargs sed -i -E "s@$find_regex@\0_MB@g"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
This line was accidentally removed in #22778.
|
|
It is an inclusive upper bound according to its definition.
|
|
call sites
d273e53b6e2cabd91a83f0ff0f9b6cfe1815b637 bench/rpc_mempool: Create ChainTestingSetup, use its CTxMemPool (Carl Dong)
020caba3df727ae8ede50eace86ae76971c0fea1 bench: Use existing CTxMemPool in TestingSetup (Carl Dong)
86e732def3983f99ec84b59375615bedcdc0e664 scripted-diff: test: Use CTxMemPool in TestingSetup (Carl Dong)
213457e170ce41a0b26c644aa010111df36414a6 test/policyestimator: Use ChainTestingSetup's CTxMemPool (Carl Dong)
319f0ceeeb25f28e027fc41be2755092dc5365b4 rest/getutxos: Don't construct empty mempool (Carl Dong)
03574b956a274207ba90591781e0914609225136 tree-wide: clang-format CTxMemPool references (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project: #24303, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18
This PR reduces the number of call sites where we explicitly construct CTxMemPool. This is done in preparation for later PRs which decouple the mempool module from `ArgsManager`, eventually all of libbitcoinkernel will be decoupled from `ArgsManager`.
The changes in this PR:
- Allows us to have less code churn as we modify `CTxMemPool`'s constructor in later PRs
- In many cases, we can make use of existing `CTxMemPool` instances, getting rid of extraneous constructions
- In other cases, we construct a `ChainTestingSetup` and use the `CTxMemPool` there, so that we can rely on the logic in `setup_common` to set things up correctly
## Notes for Reviewers
### A note on using existing mempools
When evaluating whether or not it's appropriate to use an existing mempool in a `*TestingSetup` struct, the key is to make sure that the mempool has the same lifetime as the `*TestingSetup` struct.
Example 1: In [`src/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/b4f686952a60bbadc7ed2250651d0d6af0959f4d/src/test/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp), the `TestingSetup` is initialized in `initialize_tx_pool` and lives as a static global, while the `CTxMemPool` is in the `tx_pool_standard` fuzz target, meaning that each time the `tx_pool_standard` fuzz target gets run, a new `CTxMemPool` is created. If we were to use the static global `TestingSetup`'s CTxMemPool we might run into problems since its `CTxMemPool` will carry state between subsequent runs. This is why we don't modify `src/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp` in this PR.
Example 2: In [`src/bench/mempool_eviction.cpp`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/b4f686952a60bbadc7ed2250651d0d6af0959f4d/src/bench/mempool_eviction.cpp), we see that the `TestingSetup` is in the same scope as the constructed `CTxMemPool`, so it is safe to use its `CTxMemPool`.
### A note on checking `CTxMemPool` ctor call sites
After the "tree-wide: clang-format CTxMemPool references" commit, you can find all `CTxMemPool` ctor call sites with the following command:
```sh
git grep -E -e 'make_unique<CTxMemPool>' \
-e '\bCTxMemPool\s+[^({;]+[({]' \
-e '\bCTxMemPool\s+[^;]+;' \
-e '\bnew\s+CTxMemPool\b'
```
At the end of the PR, you will find that there are still quite a few call sites that we can seemingly get rid of:
```sh
$ git grep -E -e 'make_unique<CTxMemPool>' -e '\bCTxMemPool\s+[^({;]+[({]' -e '\bCTxMemPool\s+[^;]+;' -e '\bnew\s+CTxMemPool\b'
# rearranged for easier explication
src/init.cpp: node.mempool = std::make_unique<CTxMemPool>(node.fee_estimator.get(), mempool_check_ratio);
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: m_node.mempool = std::make_unique<CTxMemPool>(m_node.fee_estimator.get(), 1);
src/rpc/mining.cpp: CTxMemPool empty_mempool;
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: CTxMemPool empty_pool;
src/bench/mempool_stress.cpp: CTxMemPool pool;
src/bench/mempool_stress.cpp: CTxMemPool pool;
src/test/fuzz/rbf.cpp: CTxMemPool pool;
src/test/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp: CTxMemPool tx_pool_{/*estimator=*/nullptr, /*check_ratio=*/1};
src/test/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp: CTxMemPool tx_pool_{/*estimator=*/nullptr, /*check_ratio=*/1};
src/test/fuzz/validation_load_mempool.cpp: CTxMemPool pool{};
src/txmempool.h: /** Create a new CTxMemPool.
```
Let's break them down one by one:
```
src/init.cpp: node.mempool = std::make_unique<CTxMemPool>(node.fee_estimator.get(), mempool_check_ratio);
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: m_node.mempool = std::make_unique<CTxMemPool>(m_node.fee_estimator.get(), 1);
```
Necessary
-----
```
src/rpc/mining.cpp: CTxMemPool empty_mempool;
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: CTxMemPool empty_pool;
```
These are fixed in #25223 where we stop requiring the `BlockAssembler` to have a `CTxMemPool` if it's not going to consult it anyway (as is the case in these two call sites)
-----
```
src/bench/mempool_stress.cpp: CTxMemPool pool;
src/bench/mempool_stress.cpp: CTxMemPool pool;
```
Fixed in #24927.
-----
```
src/test/fuzz/rbf.cpp: CTxMemPool pool;
src/test/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp: CTxMemPool tx_pool_{/*estimator=*/nullptr, /*check_ratio=*/1};
src/test/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp: CTxMemPool tx_pool_{/*estimator=*/nullptr, /*check_ratio=*/1};
src/test/fuzz/validation_load_mempool.cpp: CTxMemPool pool{};
```
These are all cases where we don't want the `CTxMemPool` state to persist between runs, see the previous section "A note on using existing mempools"
-----
```
src/txmempool.h: /** Create a new CTxMemPool.
```
It's a comment (someone link me to a grep that understands syntax plz thx)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK d273e53b6e2cabd91a83f0ff0f9b6cfe1815b637
Tree-SHA512: c4ff3d23217a7cc4a7145defc7b901725073ef73bcac3a252ed75f672c87e98ca0368d1d8c3f606b5b49f641e7d8387d26ef802141b650b215876f191fb6d5f9
|
|
Currently there are some confusions in net_processing:
* There is confusion between `-blocksonly mode` and `block-relay-only`,
so adjust all comments to use the same nomenclature.
* Whether to disconnect peers for providing invs/txs is implemented
differently. For example, it seems a bit confusing to disconnect
`block-relay-only` peers with `relay` permission when they send a tx
message, but not when they send an inv message. Also, keeping track of
their inv announcements seems both wasteful and confusing, as it does
nothing. This isn't possible in practice, as outbound connections do
not have permissions assigned, but sees fragile to rely on. Especially
in light of proposed changes to make that possible:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17167
|
|
ce893c0497fc9b8ab9752153dfcc77c9f427545e doc: Update developer notes (Anthony Towns)
d2852917eecad6ab422a7b2c9892d351a7f0cc96 sync.h: Imply negative assertions when calling LOCK (Anthony Towns)
bba87c0553780eacf0317fbfec7330ea27aa02f8 scripted-diff: Convert global Mutexes to GlobalMutexes (Anthony Towns)
a559509a0b8cade27199740212d7b589f71a0e3b sync.h: Add GlobalMutex type (Anthony Towns)
be6aa72f9f8d50b6b5b19b319a74abe7ab4099ff qt/clientmodel: thread safety annotation for m_cached_tip_mutex (Anthony Towns)
f24bd45b37e1b2d19e5a053dbfefa30306c1d41a net_processing: thread safety annotation for m_tx_relay_mutex (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
This changes `LOCK(mutex)` for non-global, non-recursive mutexes to be annotated with the negative capability for the mutex it refers to, to prevent . clang applies negative capabilities recursively, so this helps avoid forgetting to annotate functions.
This can't reasonably be used for globals, because clang would require every function to be annotated with `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(!g_mutex)` for each global mutex; so this introduces a trivial `GlobalMutex` subclass of `Mutex`, and reduces the annotations for both `GlobalMutex` to `LOCKS_EXCLUDED` which only catches trivial errors (eg (`LOCK(x); LOCK(x);`).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ce893c0497fc9b8ab9752153dfcc77c9f427545e 🐦
hebasto:
ACK ce893c0497fc9b8ab9752153dfcc77c9f427545e
Tree-SHA512: 5c35e8c7677ce3d994a7e3774f4344adad496223a51b3a1d1d3b5f20684b2e1d5cff688eb3fbc8d33e1b9940dfa76e515f9434e21de6f3ce3c935e29a319f529
|
|
fa4068b4e2192f168bb120624eca5735f0dadf6f Move minRelayTxFee to policy/settings (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Seems a bit confusing to put policy stuff into validation, so fix that.
Also fix includes via `iwyu`.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
ACK fa4068b, the includes move compiles well locally.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa4068b4e2192f168bb120624eca5735f0dadf6f. Make sense to move the global variable to policy/settings and the default constant to policy/policy. Ariard points out other constants that could be moved, which seems fine, but it seems like moving the global variable to be with other related global variables is more significant.
Tree-SHA512: adf9619002610d1877f3aef0a9e6115fc4c2ad64135a3e5100824c650b560c47f47ac28894c6214a50a7888355252a9f6f7cec98c23a771a1964160ef1ca77de
|
|
during IBD
48262a00f58489d705314ee3c31136133040bb0e Add functional test for block sync from inbound peers (Suhas Daftuar)
0569b5c4bbf8f725e3969d76f7cb081cdf1e4195 Sync chain more readily from inbound peers during IBD (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
When in IBD, if the honest chain is only known by inbound peers, then we must
eventually sync from them in order to learn it. This change allows us to
perform initial headers sync and fetch blocks from inbound peers, if we have no
blocks in flight.
The restriction on having no blocks in flight means that we will naturally
throttle our block downloads to any such inbound peers that we may be
downloading from, until we leave IBD. This is a tradeoff between preferring
outbound peers for most of our block download, versus making sure we always
eventually will get blocks we need that are only known by inbound peers even
during IBD, as otherwise we may be stuck in IBD indefinitely (which could have
cascading failure on the network, if a large fraction of the network managed to
get stuck in IBD).
Note that the test in the second commit fails on master, without the first commit.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 48262a00f58489d705314ee3c31136133040bb0e
sipa:
ACK 48262a00f58489d705314ee3c31136133040bb0e
Tree-SHA512: ffad3a05fa9a32a92226843c9128f52c275e8d51930fde7368badc340227f2ed680561c4c9f2937b4e3bd722474464849ec9b624f912f5e380ce98d71b55764d
|
|
Also fix includes using iwyu
|
|
sufficient chainwork
a35f963edf1a14ee572abea106fb0147575e4694 Add test for getheaders behavior (Suhas Daftuar)
ef6dbe6863d92710fd2da7781e5b2aac87578751 Respond to getheaders if we have sufficient chainwork (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Previously, we would check to see if we were in IBD and ignore getheaders requests accordingly. However, the IBD criteria -- an optimization mostly targeted at behavior when we have peers serving us many blocks we need to download -- is difficult to reason about in edge-case scenarios, such as if the network were to go a long time without any blocks found and nodes are getting restarted during that time.
To make things simpler to reason about, just use `nMinimumChainWork` as our anti-DoS threshold for responding to a getheaders request; as long as our chain has that much work, it should be fine to respond to a peer asking for our headers (and this should allow such a peer to request blocks from us if needed).
ACKs for top commit:
klementtan:
crACK a35f963edf1a14ee572abea106fb0147575e4694
naumenkogs:
ACK a35f963edf1a14ee572abea106fb0147575e4694
MarcoFalke:
review ACK a35f963edf1a14ee572abea106fb0147575e4694 🗯
Tree-SHA512: 131e3872e7fe80382ea9c1ec202d6c2dc59c006355c69000aa3f4ce6bccd02a6c689c8cb8f3542b5d9bc48bfa61edcbd1a78535c0b79018971d02bed2655d284
|
|
`Misbehaving` has several coding related issues (ignoring the conceptual
issues here for now):
* It is public, but it is not supposed to be called from outside of
net_processing. Fix that by making it private and creating a public
`UnitTestMisbehaving` method for unit testing only.
* It doesn't do anything if a `nullptr` is passed. It would be less
confusing to just skip the call instead. Fix that by passing `Peer&`
to `Misbehaving()`.
* It calls `GetPeerRef`, causing `!m_peer_mutex` lock annotations to be
propagated. This is harmless, but verbose. Fix it by removing the no
longer needed call to `GetPeerRef` and the no longer needed lock
annotations.
|
|
[META] Do this so that we can more easily grep for all actual instances
of CTxMemPool construction.
|
|
propagating some negative capabilities
2b3373c1520aa0b41277cd89956224e08cbd79dd refactor: Propagate negative `!m_tx_relay_mutex` capability (Hennadii Stepanov)
5a6e3c1db3e9d8ee2ecb0f0fe2fba073a442ad76 refactor: Propagate negative `!m_most_recent_block_mutex` capability (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up for bitcoin/bitcoin#22778 and bitcoin/bitcoin#24062, and it seems [required](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24931#issuecomment-1132800173) for bitcoin/bitcoin#24931.
See details in the commit messages.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 2b3373c1520aa0b41277cd89956224e08cbd79dd
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25175/commits/2b3373c1520aa0b41277cd89956224e08cbd79dd
Tree-SHA512: 8a4bb9641af8d79824ec12e2d6bfce0e09524094b298a2edcdb2ab115fbaa21215b9c97a6b059f8aa023551071fd5798eca66ab8d262a3f97246a91d960850d0
|
|
|
|
fa1b76aeb064b315a3767a8f59836ca18aeb117e Do not call global Params() when chainman is in scope (MacroFake)
fa30234be81b6f49ae8150478a9255daa1611083 Do not pass CChainParams& to PeerManager::make (MacroFake)
fafe5c0ca2927642cbcec63ac73994737e1653d6 Do not pass CChainParams& to BlockAssembler constructor (MacroFake)
faf012b438b451dced785e7f031e07c0c55665e1 Do not pass Consensus::Params& to Chainstate helpers (MacroFake)
fa4ee53dca5ccf1b87f019f372ffc10528add943 Do not pass time getter to Chainstate helpers (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
It seems confusing to pass chain params, consensus params, or a time function around when it is not needed.
Fix this by:
* Inlining the passed time getter function. I don't see a use case why this should be mockable.
* Using `chainman.GetConsensus()` or `chainman.GetParams()`, where possible.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fa1b76aeb064b315a3767a8f59836ca18aeb117e.
vincenzopalazzo:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25168/commits/fa1b76aeb064b315a3767a8f59836ca18aeb117e
Tree-SHA512: 1abff5cba4b4871d97f17dbcdf67bc9255ff21fa4150a79a74e39b28f0610eab3e7dee24d56872dd6e111f003b55e288958cdd467e6218368d896f191e4ec9cd
|
|
Could be verified with
$ ./configure CC=clang CXX=clang++ CXXFLAGS='-Wthread-safety -Wthread-safety-negative'
$ make clean
$ make 2>&1 | grep m_tx_relay_mutex
|
