aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/net_processing.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-09-08Do not pass chain params to CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers twiceMarcoFalke
2020-09-07Merge #19791: [net processing] Move Misbehaving() to PeerManagerMarcoFalke
bb6a32ce9983c72afa90f41a43a47ffd703ca006 [net processing] Move Misbehaving() to PeerManager (John Newbery) aa114b1c9b06c2bd3ed936bbb9fb32b31f75bdb2 [net_processing] Move SendBlockTransactions into PeerManager (John Newbery) 3115e00f75b41d9765dcbb376e367b25f61a1d58 [net processing] Move MaybePunishPeerForTx to PeerManager (John Newbery) e662e2d42afaf9c67c898634a0f3bc200255b6ea [net processing] Move ProcessOrphanTx to PeerManager (John Newbery) b70cd890e375e904b7f36b3d959e5656f5a5cbcd [net processing] Move MaybePunishNodeForBlock into PeerManager (John Newbery) d7778351bf60a21925a97b7fc4e9df5541b6d995 [net processing] Move ProcessHeadersMessage to PeerManager (John Newbery) 64f6162651420be2f4aa1498f0378a86780bc089 [whitespace] tidy up indentation after scripted diff (John Newbery) 58bd369b0ddd3383f7bdf7840912d18b96545f91 scripted-diff: [net processing] Rename PeerLogicValidation to PeerManager (John Newbery) 2297b26b3ce95e935c0ebb8c38dabf19965054a5 [net_processing] Pass chainparams to PeerLogicValidation constructor (John Newbery) 824bbd1ffba3df7ffa6f5bfaa31298cd484473b1 [move only] Collect all private members of PeerLogicValidation together (John Newbery) Pull request description: Continues the work of moving net_processing logic into PeerLogicValidation. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19704 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19607#discussion_r462032894 for motivation. This PR also renames `PeerLogicValidation` to `PeerManager` as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10756#pullrequestreview-53892618. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: re-ACK bb6a32ce99 only change is rebase due to conflict in struct NodeContext and variable rename 🤸 hebasto: re-ACK bb6a32ce9983c72afa90f41a43a47ffd703ca006, only rebased, and added renaming `s/peer_logic/peerman/` into scripted-diff since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19791#pullrequestreview-483118079) review (verified with `git range-diff`). Tree-SHA512: a2de4a521688fd25125b401e5575402c52b328a0fa27b3010567008d4f596b960aabbd02b2d81f42658f88f4365443fadb1008150a62fbcea123fb42d85a2c21
2020-09-07[net processing] Move Misbehaving() to PeerManagerJohn Newbery
2020-09-07[net_processing] Move SendBlockTransactions into PeerManagerJohn Newbery
2020-09-07[net processing] Move MaybePunishPeerForTx to PeerManagerJohn Newbery
2020-09-07[net processing] Move ProcessOrphanTx to PeerManagerJohn Newbery
2020-09-07[net processing] Move MaybePunishNodeForBlock into PeerManagerJohn Newbery
2020-09-07[net processing] Move ProcessHeadersMessage to PeerManagerJohn Newbery
2020-09-07[whitespace] tidy up indentation after scripted diffJohn Newbery
2020-09-07scripted-diff: [net processing] Rename PeerLogicValidation to PeerManagerJohn Newbery
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i 's/PeerLogicValidation/PeerManager/g' $(git grep -l PeerLogicValidation ./src ./test) sed -i 's/peer_logic/peerman/g' $(git grep -l peer_logic ./src ./test) -END VERIFY SCRIPT- PeerLogicValidation was originally net_processing's implementation to the validation interface. It has since grown to contain much of net_processing's logic. Therefore rename it to reflect its responsibilities. Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10756#pullrequestreview-53892618.
2020-09-07[net_processing] Pass chainparams to PeerLogicValidation constructorJohn Newbery
Keep a references to chainparams, rather than calling the global Params() function every time it's needed. This is fine, since globalChainParams does not get updated once it's been set, and it's available at the point of constructing the PeerLogicValidation object.
2020-09-07[move only] Collect all private members of PeerLogicValidation togetherJohn Newbery
We don't have a project style for ordering class members, but it always makes sense to have no more than one of each public/protected/private specifier. Also move documentation for MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect to the header.
2020-09-07Merge #19478: Remove CTxMempool::mapLinks data structure memberMarcoFalke
296be8f58e02b39a58f017c52294aceed22c3ffd Get rid of unused functions CTxMemPool::GetMemPoolChildren, CTxMemPool::GetMemPoolParents (Jeremy Rubin) 46d955d196043cc297834baeebce31ff778dff80 Remove mapLinks in favor of entry inlined structs with iterator type erasure (Jeremy Rubin) Pull request description: Currently we have a peculiar data structure in the mempool called maplinks. Maplinks job is to track the in-pool children and parents of each transaction. This PR can be primarily understood and reviewed as a simple refactoring to remove this extra data structure, although it comes with a nice memory and performance improvement for free. Maplinks is particularly peculiar because removing it is not as simple as just moving it's inner structure to the owning CTxMempoolEntry. Because TxLinks (the class storing the setEntries for parents and children) store txiters to each entry in the mempool corresponding to the parent or child, it means that the TxLinks type is "aware" of the boost multiindex (mapTx) it's coming from, which is in turn, aware of the entry type stored in mapTx. Thus we used maplinks to store this entry associated data we in an entirely separate data structure just to avoid a circular type reference caused by storing a txiter inside a CTxMempoolEntry. It turns out, we can kill this circular reference by making use of iterator_to multiindex function and std::reference_wrapper. This allows us to get rid of the maplinks data structure and move the ownership of the parents/child sets to the entries themselves. The benefit of this good all around, for any of the reasons given below the change would be acceptable, and it doesn't make the code harder to reason about or worse in any respect (as far as I can tell, there's no tradeoff). ### Simpler ownership model No longer having to consistency check that mapLinks did have records for our CTxMempoolEntry, impossible to have a mapLinks entry outlive or incorrectly die before a CTxMempoolEntry. ### Memory Usage We get rid of a O(Transactions) sized map in the mempool, which is a long lived data structure. ### Performance If you have a CTxMemPoolEntry, you immediately know the address of it's children/parents, rather than having to do a O(log(Transactions)) lookup via maplinks (which we do very often). We do it in *so many* places that a true benchmark has to look at a full running node, but it is easy enough to show an improvement in this case. The ComplexMemPool shows a good coherence check that we see the expected result of it being 12.5% faster / 1.14x faster. ``` Before: # Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 1.40462, 0.277222, 0.285339, 0.279793 After: # Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 1.22586, 0.243831, 0.247076, 0.244596 ``` The ComplexMemPool benchmark only checks doing addUnchecked and TrimToSize for 800 transactions. While this bench does a good job of hammering the relevant types of function, it doesn't test everything. Subbing in 5000 transactions shows a that the advantage isn't completely wiped out by other asymptotic factors (this isn't the only bottleneck in growing the mempool), but it's only a bit proportionally slower (10.8%, 1.12x), which adds evidence that this will be a good change for performance minded users. ``` # Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 59.1321, 11.5919, 12.235, 11.7068 # Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 52.1307, 10.2641, 10.5206, 10.4306 ``` I don't think it's possible to come up with an example of where a maplinks based design would have better performance, but it's something for reviewers to consider. # Discussion ## Why maplinks in the first place? I spoke with the author of mapLinks (sdaftuar) a while back, and my recollection from our conversation was that it was implemented because he did not know how to resolve the circular dependency at the time, and there was no other reason for making it a separate map. ## Is iterator_to weird? iterator_to is expressly for this purpose, see https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_51_0/libs/multi_index/doc/tutorial/indices.html#iterator_to > iterator_to provides a way to retrieve an iterator to an element from a pointer to the element, thus making iterators and pointers interchangeable for the purposes of element pointing (not so for traversal) in many situations. This notwithstanding, it is not the aim of iterator_to to promote the usage of pointers as substitutes for real iterators: the latter are specifically designed for handling the elements of a container, and not only benefit from the iterator orientation of container interfaces, but are also capable of exposing many more programming bugs than raw pointers, both at compile and run time. iterator_to is thus meant to be used in scenarios where access via iterators is not suitable or desireable: > > - Interoperability with preexisting APIs based on pointers or references. > - Publication of pointer-based interfaces (for instance, when designing a C-compatible library). > - The exposure of pointers in place of iterators can act as a type erasure barrier effectively decoupling the user of the code from the implementation detail of which particular container is being used. Similar techniques, like the famous Pimpl idiom, are used in large projects to reduce dependencies and build times. > - Self-referencing contexts where an element acts upon its owner container and no iterator to itself is available. In other words, iterator_to is the perfect tool for the job by the last reason given. Under the hood it should just be a simple pointer cast and have no major runtime overhead (depending on if the function call is inlined). Edit by laanwj: removed at sign from the description ACKs for top commit: jonatack: re-ACK 296be8f per `git range-diff ab338a19 3ba1665 296be8f`, sanity check gcc 10.2 debug build is clean. hebasto: re-ACK 296be8f58e02b39a58f017c52294aceed22c3ffd, only rebased since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19478#pullrequestreview-482400727) review (verified with `git range-diff`). Tree-SHA512: f5c30a4936fcde6ae32a02823c303b3568a747c2681d11f87df88a149f984a6d3b4c81f391859afbeb68864ef7f6a3d8779f74a58e3de701b3d51f78e498682e
2020-09-05Remove mempool global from p2pMarcoFalke
2020-09-05Merge #19728: Increase the ip address relay branching factor for unreachable ↵Wladimir J. van der Laan
networks 86d4cf42d97abf4c436d1eabf29e2ed150f69c1e Increase the ip address relay branching factor for unreachable networks (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: Onion addresses propagate very badly among the IPv4/IPv6 network, resulting in difficulty for those to find each other. The branching factor 1 is probably so low that propagations die out before they reach another onion peer. Increase it to 1.5 on average. ACKs for top commit: practicalswift: ACK 86d4cf42d97abf4c436d1eabf29e2ed150f69c1e -- patch looks correct naumenkogs: ACK 86d4cf4 jonatack: ACK 86d4cf42d97abf4c436d1eabf29e2ed150f69c1e. Code review, built and running with some sanity check logging. `RelayAddress()` is called by `ProcessMessage() ADDR` msg handling, from within the loop while processing each new address to relay it to a limited number of other nodes. According to git blame, the line setting `nRelayNodes` hasn't been touched since 2016 in e736772c56a *Move network-msg-processing code out of main to its own file*, which moved the line but otherwise did not change it. Running a mixed clearnet/onion node with this patch and the logging below, I'm only seeing values of `fReachable 1, nRelayNodes 2`. IIUC, I need to use the settings in `init.cpp` that call `SetReachable(*, false)`. *Edit:* with `onlynet=onion` am now seeing entries of `fReachable 0` with `nRelayNodes` values of 1 and 2. vasild: ACK 86d4cf42d Tree-SHA512: 22391e16d60bcfdec9a9336728da39d68a24a183b3d1b0e8fbc038d265ca6ddf71d16db018f3678745fd9f3e9281049e42197fa0a29124833c50a9170ed6f793
2020-09-04Remove mapLinks in favor of entry inlined structs with iterator type erasureJeremy Rubin
2020-09-02[refactor] Simplify check for block-relay-only connection.Amiti Uttarwar
Previously we deduced it was a block-relay-only based on presence of the m_tx_relay structure. Now we have the ability to identify it directly via a connection type accessor function.
2020-09-02[trivial] Small style updatesAmiti Uttarwar
2020-09-02[doc] Explain address handling logic in process messagesAmiti Uttarwar
Co-authored-by: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
2020-09-02[refactor] Restructure logic to check for addr relay.Amiti Uttarwar
We previously identified if we relay addresses to the connection by checking for the existence of the m_addr_known data structure. With this commit, we answer this question based on the connection type. IsAddrRelayPeer() checked for the existence of the m_addr_known
2020-09-02Merge #19610: p2p: refactor AlreadyHave(), CInv::type, INV/TX processingWladimir J. van der Laan
fb56d37612dea6666e7da73d671311a697570dae p2p: ensure inv is GenMsgTx before ToGenTxid in inv processing (John Newbery) aa3621385ee66c9dde5c632c0a79fba3a6ea2d62 test: use CInv::MSG_WITNESS_TX flag in p2p_segwit (Jon Atack) 24ee4f01eadb870435712950a1364cf0def06e9f p2p: make gtxid(.hash) and fAlreadyHave localvars const (Jon Atack) b1c855453bf2634e7fd9b53c4a76a8536fc9865d p2p: use CInv block message helpers in net_processing.cpp (Jon Atack) acd66421671e42a58e8e067868e1ab86268e3231 [net processing] Change AlreadyHaveTx() to take a GenTxid (John Newbery) 5fdfb80b861e0de3fcf8a57163b3f52af4b2df3b [net processing] Change AlreadyHaveBlock() to take block_hash argument (John Newbery) 430e183b89d00b4148f0b77a6fcacca2cd948202 [net processing] Remove mempool argument from AlreadyHaveBlock() (John Newbery) 42ca5618cae0fd9ef97d2006b17d896bc58cc17c [net processing] Split AlreadyHave() into separate block and tx functions (John Newbery) 39f1dc944554218911b0945fff7e6d06f3dab284 p2p: remove nFetchFlags from NetMsgType TX and INV processing (Jon Atack) 471714e1f024fb3b4892a7a8b34a76b83a13fa19 p2p: add CInv block message helper methods (Jon Atack) Pull request description: Building on #19590 and the recent `wtxid` and `GenTxid` changes, this is a refactoring and cleanup PR to simplify and improve some of the net processing code. Some of the diffs are best reviewed with `-w` to ignore spacing. Co-authored by John Newbery. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK fb56d37612dea6666e7da73d671311a697570dae jnewbery: utACK fb56d37612dea6666e7da73d671311a697570dae vasild: ACK fb56d3761 Tree-SHA512: ba39b58e6aaf850880a842fe5f6295e9f1870906ef690206acfc17140aae2ac854981e1066dbcd4238062478762fbd040ef772fdc2c50eea6869997c583e6a6d
2020-09-01Merge #19668: Do not hide compile-time thread safety warningsMarcoFalke
ea74e10acf17903e44c85e3678853414653dd4e1 doc: Add best practice for annotating/asserting locks (Hennadii Stepanov) 2ee7743fe723227f2ea1b031eddb14fc6863f4c8 sync.h: Make runtime lock checks require compile-time lock checks (Anthony Towns) 23d71d171e6e22ba5e4a909d597a54595b2a2c1f Do not hide compile-time thread safety warnings (Hennadii Stepanov) 3ddc150857178bfb1c854c05bf9b526777876f56 Add missed thread safety annotations (Hennadii Stepanov) af9ea55a72c94678b343f5dd98dc78f3a3ac58cb Use LockAssertion utility class instead of AssertLockHeld() (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: On the way of transit from `RecursiveMutex` to `Mutex` (see #19303) it is crucial to have run-time `AssertLockHeld()` assertion that does _not_ hide compile-time Clang Thread Safety Analysis warnings. On master (65e4ecabd5b4252154640c7bac38c92a3f3a7018) using `AssertLockHeld()` could hide Clang Thread Safety Analysis warnings, e.g., with the following patch applied: ```diff --- a/src/txmempool.h +++ b/src/txmempool.h @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ public: void addUnchecked(const CTxMemPoolEntry& entry, setEntries& setAncestors, bool validFeeEstimate = true) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main); void removeRecursive(const CTransaction& tx, MemPoolRemovalReason reason) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs); - void removeForReorg(const CCoinsViewCache* pcoins, unsigned int nMemPoolHeight, int flags) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main); + void removeForReorg(const CCoinsViewCache* pcoins, unsigned int nMemPoolHeight, int flags) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main); void removeConflicts(const CTransaction& tx) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs); void removeForBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx, unsigned int nBlockHeight) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs); ``` Clang compiles the code without any thread safety warnings. See "Add missed thread safety annotations" commit for the actual thread safety warnings that are fixed in this PR. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK ea74e10acf 🎙 jnewbery: ACK ea74e10acf17903e44c85e3678853414653dd4e1 ajtowns: ACK ea74e10acf17903e44c85e3678853414653dd4e1 Tree-SHA512: 8cba996e526751a1cb0e613c0cc1b10f027a3e9945fbfb4bd30f6355fd36b9f9c2e1e95ed3183fc254b42df7c30223278e18e5bdb5e1ef85db7fef067595d447
2020-08-29Use LockAssertion utility class instead of AssertLockHeld()Hennadii Stepanov
This change prepares for upcoming commit "Do not hide compile-time thread safety warnings" by replacing AssertLockHeld() with LockAssertion() where needed.
2020-08-28Merge #19607: [p2p] Add Peer struct for per-peer data in net processingWladimir J. van der Laan
8e35bf59062b3a823182588e0bf809b3367c2be0 scripted-diff: rename misbehavior members (John Newbery) 1f96d2e673a78220eebf3bbd15b121c51c4cd97b [net processing] Move misbehavior tracking state to Peer (John Newbery) 7cd4159ac834432dadd60a5e8ee817f3cadbee55 [net processing] Add Peer (John Newbery) aba03359a6e62a376ae44914f609f82a1556fc89 [net processing] Remove CNodeState.name (John Newbery) Pull request description: We currently have two structures for per-peer data: - `CNode` in net, which should just contain connection layer data (eg socket, send/recv buffers, etc), but currently also contains some application layer data (eg tx/block inventory). - `CNodeState` in net processing, which contains p2p application layer data, but requires cs_main to be locked for access. This PR adds a third struct `Peer`, which is for p2p application layer data, and doesn't require cs_main. Eventually all application layer data from `CNode` should be moved to `Peer`, and any data that doesn't strictly require cs_main should be moved from `CNodeState` to `Peer` (probably all of `CNodeState` eventually). `Peer` objects are stored as shared pointers in a net processing global map `g_peer_map`, which is protected by `g_peer_mutex`. To use a `Peer` object, `g_peer_mutex` is locked, a copy of the shared pointer is taken, and the lock is released. Individual members of `Peer` are protected by different mutexes that guard related data. The lifetime of the `Peer` object is managed by the shared_ptr refcount. This PR adds the `Peer` object and moves the misbehaving data from `CNodeState` to `Peer`. This allows us to immediately remove 15 `LOCK(cs_main)` instances. For more motivation see #19398 ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK 8e35bf59062b3a823182588e0bf809b3367c2be0 troygiorshev: reACK 8e35bf59062b3a823182588e0bf809b3367c2be0 via `git range-diff master 9510938 8e35bf5` theuni: ACK 8e35bf59062b3a823182588e0bf809b3367c2be0. jonatack: ACK 8e35bf59062b3a823182588e0bf809b3367c2be0 keeping in mind Cory's comment (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19607#discussion_r470173964) for the follow-up Tree-SHA512: ad84a92b78fb34c9f43813ca3dfbc7282c887d55300ea2ce0994d134da3e0c7dbc44d54380e00b13bb75a57c28857ac3236bea9135467075d78026767a19e4b1
2020-08-26p2p: ensure inv is GenMsgTx before ToGenTxid in inv processingJohn Newbery
and otherwise log that an unknown INV type was received. In INV processing, when handling transaction type inv messages, ToGenTxid() expects that we constructed the CInv ourselves or that we verified that it is for a transaction type CInv. Therefore, change this `else` branch into an `else if (inv.GenMsgTx())` to make this safer and log any INVs that fall through.
2020-08-26p2p: make gtxid(.hash) and fAlreadyHave localvars constJon Atack
2020-08-26p2p: use CInv block message helpers in net_processing.cppJon Atack
2020-08-26[net processing] Change AlreadyHaveTx() to take a GenTxidJohn Newbery
2020-08-26[net processing] Change AlreadyHaveBlock() to take block_hash argumentJohn Newbery
2020-08-26[net processing] Remove mempool argument from AlreadyHaveBlock()John Newbery
2020-08-26[net processing] Split AlreadyHave() into separate block and tx functionsJohn Newbery
2020-08-26p2p: remove nFetchFlags from NetMsgType TX and INV processingJon Atack
The nFetchFlags code can be removed here because GetFetchFlags() can only add the MSG_WITNESS_FLAG, which is added to the CInv::type field. That CInv is only passed to AlreadyHave() or ToGenTxid(), and neither of those functions do anything different depending on whether the CInv type is MSG_TX or MSG_WITNESS_TX. Co-authored by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
2020-08-24Merge #19704: Net processing: move ProcessMessage() to PeerLogicValidationfanquake
daed542a12e0a6a4692aca12a61b84cd55accc33 [net_processing] Move ProcessMessage to PeerLogicValidation (John Newbery) c556770b5ef4306f10e980daff772bee87daaa30 [net_processing] Change PeerLogicValidation to hold a connman reference (John Newbery) Pull request description: Rather than ProcessMessage() being a static function in net_processing.cpp, make it a private member function of PeerLogicValidation. This is the start of moving static functions and global variables into PeerLogicValidation to make it better encapsulated. ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK daed542a12e0a6a4692aca12a61b84cd55accc33 code review and debug tested promag: Code review ACK daed542a12e0a6a4692aca12a61b84cd55accc33. MarcoFalke: re-ACK daed542a12, only change is removing second commit 🎴 theStack: Code Review ACK daed542a12e0a6a4692aca12a61b84cd55accc33 Tree-SHA512: ddebf410d114d9ad5a9e536950018ff333a347c035d74fcc101fb4a3f20a281782c7eac2b7d1bd1c8f6bc7e59f5b5630fb52c2e1b4c32df454fa584673bd021e
2020-08-21[net_processing] Move ProcessMessage to PeerLogicValidationJohn Newbery
2020-08-14Increase the ip address relay branching factor for unreachable networksPieter Wuille
Onion addresses propagate very badly among the IPv4/IPv6 network, resulting in difficulty for those to find each other. The branching factor 1 is probably so low that propagations die out before they reach another onion peer. Increase it to 1.5 on average.
2020-08-13Merge #19070: p2p: Signal support for compact block filters with ↵Wladimir J. van der Laan
NODE_COMPACT_FILTERS f5c003d3ead182335252558c5c6c9b9ca8968065 [test] Add test for NODE_COMPACT_FILTER. (Jim Posen) 132b30d9c84f2a8053714a438f227b583a89a9ea [net] Signal NODE_COMPACT_FILTERS if we're serving compact filters. (Jim Posen) b3fbc94d4f2937bb682f2766cc9a8d4fde328a3f Apply cfilters review fixups (John Newbery) Pull request description: If -peerblockfilters is configured, signal the `NODE_COMPACT_FILTERS` service bit to indicate that we are able to serve compact block filters, headers and checkpoints. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: re-review and Concept ACK f5c003d3ead182335252558c5c6c9b9ca8968065 fjahr: Code review ACK f5c003d3ead182335252558c5c6c9b9ca8968065 clarkmoody: Concept ACK f5c003d3ead182335252558c5c6c9b9ca8968065 ariard: Concept and Code Review ACK f5c003d jonatack: ACK f5c003d3e Tree-SHA512: 34d1c153530a0e55d09046fe548c9dc37344b5d6d50e00af1b4e1de1e7b49de770fca8471346a17c151de9fe164776296bb3dd5af331977f0c3ef1e6fc906f85
2020-08-12[net_processing] Change PeerLogicValidation to hold a connman referenceJohn Newbery
Hold a reference to connman rather than a pointer because: - PeerLogicValidation can't run without a connman - The pointer never gets reseated The alternative is to always assert that the pointer is non-null before dereferencing. Change the name from connman to m_connman at the same time to conform with current style guidelines.
2020-08-12Merge #19658: [rpc] Allow RPC to fetch all addrman records and add records ↵Wladimir J. van der Laan
to addrman 37a480e0cd94895b6051abef12d984ff74bdc4a3 [net] Add addpeeraddress RPC method (John Newbery) ae8051bbd8377f2458ff1f167dc30c2d5f83e317 [test] Test that getnodeaddresses() can return all known addresses (John Newbery) f26502e9fc8a669b30717525597e3f468eaecf79 [addrman] Specify max addresses and pct when calling GetAddresses() (John Newbery) Pull request description: Currently addrman only allows a maximum of 1000 records or 23% of all records to be returned in a call to `GetAddr()`. Relax this limit and have the client specify the max records they want. For p2p, behaviour is unchanged (but the rate limiting is set inside net_processing, where it belongs). For RPC, `getnodeaddresses` can now return the complete addrman, which is helpful for testing and monitoring. Also add a test-only RPC `addpeeraddress`, which adds an IP address:port to addrman. This is helpful for testing (eg #18991). ACKs for top commit: naumenkogs: utACK 37a480e0cd94895b6051abef12d984ff74bdc4a3 laanwj: Code review and lightly manually tested ACK 37a480e0cd94895b6051abef12d984ff74bdc4a3 Tree-SHA512: f86dcd410aaebaf6e9ca18ce6f23556e5e4649c1325577213d873aa09967298e65ab2dc19a72670641ae92211a923afda1fe124a82e9d2c1cad73d478ef27fdc
2020-08-12scripted-diff: rename misbehavior membersJohn Newbery
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i 's/nMisbehavior/m_misbehavior_score/g' src/net_processing.cpp src/net_processing.h src/rpc/net.cpp src/qt/rpcconsole.cpp -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2020-08-12[net processing] Move misbehavior tracking state to PeerJohn Newbery
Misbehavior tracking state is now contained in Peer instead of CNode. It is no longer guarded by cs_main, but instead by a dedicated m_misbehavior_mutex lock. This allows us to remove 14 cs_main locks from net_processing.
2020-08-12[net processing] Add PeerJohn Newbery
Peer is a struct for holding per-peer data. This structure is not protected by cs_main since it does not contain validation-critical data.
2020-08-12[net processing] Remove CNodeState.nameJohn Newbery
This has been unused since logging peer IPs was removed from Misbehaving() in a8865f8b.
2020-08-12[addrman] Specify max addresses and pct when calling GetAddresses()John Newbery
CAddrMan.GetAddr() would previously limit the number and percentage of addresses returned (to ADDRMAN_GETADDR_MAX (1000) and ADDRMAN_GETADDR_MAX_PCT (23) respectively). Instead, make it the callers responsibility to specify the maximum addresses and percentage they want returned. For net_processing, the maximums are MAX_ADDR_TO_SEND (1000) and MAX_PCT_ADDR_TO_SEND (23). For rpc/net, the maximum is specified by the client.
2020-08-12Merge #19316: [net] Cleanup logic around connection typesfanquake
01e283068b9e6214f2d77a2f772a4244ebfe2274 [net] Remove unnecessary default args on CNode constructor (Amiti Uttarwar) bc5d65b3ca41eebb1738fdda4451d1466e77772e [refactor] Remove IsOutboundDisconnectionCandidate (Amiti Uttarwar) 2f2e13b6c2c8741ca9d825eaaef736ede484bc85 [net/refactor] Simplify multiple-connection checks (Amiti Uttarwar) 7f7b83deb2427599c129f4ff581d4d045461e459 [net/refactor] Rework ThreadOpenConnections logic (Amiti Uttarwar) 35839e963bf61d2da0d12f5b8cea74ac0e0fbd7b [net] Fix bug where AddrFetch connections would be counted as outbound full relay (Amiti Uttarwar) 4972c21b671ff73f13a1b5053338b6abbdb471b5 [net/refactor] Clarify logic for selecting connections in ThreadOpenConnections (Amiti Uttarwar) 60156f5fc40d56bb532278f16ce632c5a8b8035e [net/refactor] Remove fInbound flag from CNode (Amiti Uttarwar) 7b322df6296609570e368e5f326979279041c11f [net/refactor] Remove m_addr_fetch member var from CNode (Amiti Uttarwar) 14923422b08ac4b21b35c426bf0e1b9e7c97983b [net/refactor] Remove fFeeler flag from CNode (Amiti Uttarwar) 49efac5cae7333c6700d9b737d09fae0f3f4d7fa [net/refactor] Remove m_manual_connection flag from CNode (Amiti Uttarwar) d3698b5ee309cf0f0cdfb286d6b30a256d7deae5 [net/refactor] Add connection type as a member var to CNode (Amiti Uttarwar) 46578c03e92a55925308363ccdad04dcfc820d96 [doc] Describe different connection types (Amiti Uttarwar) 442abae2bac7bff85886143df01e14215532b974 [net/refactor] Add AddrFetch connections to ConnectionType enum (Amiti Uttarwar) af59feb05235ecb85ec9d75b09c66e71268c9889 [net/refactor] Extract m_addr_known logic from initializer list (Amiti Uttarwar) e1bc29812ddf1d946bc5acca406a7ed2dca064a6 [net/refactor] Add block relay only connections to ConnectionType enum (Amiti Uttarwar) 0e52a659a2de915fc3dce37fc8fac39be1c8b6fa [net/refactor] Add feeler connections to ConnectionType enum (Amiti Uttarwar) 1521c47438537e192230486dffcec0228a53878d [net/refactor] Add manual connections to ConnectionType enum (Amiti Uttarwar) 26304b4100201754fb32440bec3e3b78cd3f0e6d [net/refactor] Introduce an enum to distinguish type of connection (Amiti Uttarwar) 3f1b7140e95d0f8f958cb35f31c3d964c57e484d scripted-diff: Rename OneShot to AddrFetch (Amiti Uttarwar) Pull request description: **This is part 1 of #19315, which enables the ability to test `outbound` and `block-relay-only` connections from the functional tests.** Please see that PR for more information of overall functionality. **This PR simplifies how we manage different connection types.** It introduces an enum with the various types of connections so we can explicitly define the connection type. The existing system relies on a series of independent flags, then has asserts scattered around to ensure that conflicting flags are not enabled at the same time. I find this approach to be both brittle and confusing. While making these changes, I found a small bug due to the silent assumptions. This PR also proposes a rename from `OneShot` to `AddrFetch`. I find the name `OneShot` to be very confusing, especially when we also have `onetry` manual connections. Everyone I've talked to offline has agreed that the name is confusing, so I propose a potential alternative. I think this is a good opportunity for a rename since I'm creating an enum to explicitly define the connection types. (some context for the unfamiliar: `oneshot` or `addrfetch` connections are short-lived connections created on startup. They connect to the seed peers, send a `getaddr` to solicit addresses, then close the connection.) Overview of this PR: * rename `oneshot` to `addrfetch` * introduce `ConnectionType` enum * one by one, add different connection types to the enum * expose the `conn_type` on CNode, and use this to reduce reliance on flags (& asserts) * fix the bug in counting different type of connections * some additional cleanup to simplify logic and make expectations explicit/inclusive rather than implicit/exclusive. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK 01e283068b9e6214f2d77a2f772a4244ebfe2274 laanwj: Code review ACK 01e283068b9e6214f2d77a2f772a4244ebfe2274, the commits are pretty straightforward to follow, and I think this is a move in the right direction overall vasild: ACK 01e283068 sdaftuar: ACK 01e283068b9e6214f2d77a2f772a4244ebfe2274. fanquake: ACK 01e283068b9e6214f2d77a2f772a4244ebfe2274 - I don't have as much experience with the networking code but these changes look fairly straight forward, the new code seems more robust/understandable and the additional documentation is great. I'm glad that a followup branch is already underway. There might be some more review comments here later today, so keep an eye on the discussion, however I'm going to merge this now. jb55: wow this code was messy before... ACK 01e283068b9e6214f2d77a2f772a4244ebfe2274 Tree-SHA512: 7bb644a6ed5849913d777ebc2ff89133ca0fbef680355a9a344e07496a979e6f9ff21a958e8eea93dcd7d5c343682b0c7174b1a3de380a4247eaae73da436e15
2020-08-10Merge #19596: Deduplicate parent txid loop of requested transactions and ↵Wladimir J. van der Laan
missing parents of orphan transactions 4c0731f9c50b0556f8a57b912c8f295c7a9ea89c Deduplicate missing parents of orphan transactions (Suhas Daftuar) 81961762439fb72fc2ef168164689ddc29d7ef94 Rewrite parent txid loop of requested transactions (Suhas Daftuar) Pull request description: I noticed a couple of places recently where we loop over all inputs of a transaction in order to do some processing on the txids we find in those inputs. There may be thousands of inputs in a transaction, and the same txid may appear many times. In a couple of places in particular, we loop over those txids and add them to a rolling bloom filter; doing that multiple times for the same txid wastes entries in that filter. This PR fixes that in two places relating to transaction relay: one on the server side, where we look for parent transactions of a tx that we are delivering to a peer to ensure that getdata requests for those parents will succeed; and the other on the client side, where when we process an orphan tx we want to loop over the parent txids and ensure that all are eventually requested from the peer who provided the orphan. This addresses a couple of [related](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19109#discussion_r455197217) [comments](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19109#discussion_r456820373) left in #19109. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK 4c0731f9c50b0556f8a57b912c8f295c7a9ea89c jonatack: ACK 4c0731f9c50b0556f8a57b912c8f295c7a9ea89c ajtowns: ACK 4c0731f9c50b0556f8a57b912c8f295c7a9ea89c Tree-SHA512: 8af9df7f56c6e54b5915519d7d5465e081473ceb1bcc89bbebf83e78722cf51ff58145e588cf57126bce17071a8053273f4bcef0ad8166bec83ba14352e40f5d
2020-08-07[refactor] Remove IsOutboundDisconnectionCandidateAmiti Uttarwar
2020-08-07[net/refactor] Simplify multiple-connection checksAmiti Uttarwar
Extract logic that check multiple connection types into interface functions & structure as switch statements. This makes it very clear what touch points are for accessing `m_conn_type` & using the switch statements enables the compiler to warn if a new connection type is introduced but not handled for these cases.
2020-08-07[net/refactor] Remove fInbound flag from CNodeAmiti Uttarwar
2020-08-07[net/refactor] Remove m_addr_fetch member var from CNodeAmiti Uttarwar
2020-08-07[net/refactor] Remove fFeeler flag from CNodeAmiti Uttarwar