aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/consensus
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-04-12versionbits: Add explicit NEVER_ACTIVE deploymentsAnthony Towns
Previously we used deployments that would timeout prior to Bitcoin's invention, which allowed the deployment to still be activated in unit tests. This switches those deployments to be truly never active.
2021-04-12versionbits: Add support for delayed activationAnthony Towns
2020-12-31scripted-diff: Bump copyright headersMarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- ./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./ -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2020-10-15doc: Move assumed-values doxygen comments to headerMarcoFalke
2020-10-12Activate Taproot/Tapscript on regtest (BIP 341, BIP 342)Pieter Wuille
Define a versionbits-based activation for the new consensus rules on regtest. No activation or activation mechanism is defined for testnet or mainnet.
2020-09-10add signet basic support (signet.cpp)Karl-Johan Alm
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
2020-09-10validation: move GetWitnessCommitmentIndex to consensus/validationKarl-Johan Alm
2020-08-04Add txids with non-standard inputs to reject filterSuhas Daftuar
Our policy checks for non-standard inputs depend only on the non-witness portion of a transaction: we look up the scriptPubKey of the input being spent from our UTXO set (which is covered by the input txid), and the p2sh checks only rely on the scriptSig portion of the input. Consequently it's safe to add txids of transactions that fail these checks to the reject filter, as the witness is irrelevant to the failure. This is helpful for any situation where we might request the transaction again via txid (either from txid-relay peers, or if we might fetch the transaction via txid due to parent-fetching of orphans). Further, in preparation for future witness versions being deployed on the network, ensure that WITNESS_UNKNOWN transactions are rejected in AreInputsStandard(), so that transactions spending v1 (or greater) witness outputs will fall into this category of having their txid added to the reject filter.
2020-07-22Merge #18044: Use wtxid for transaction relayWladimir J. van der Laan
0a4f1422cd1c20e12a05d7ff1a2ef1d5e7c654bb Further improve comments around recentRejects (Suhas Daftuar) 0e20cfedb704c1f76bb727e2009867d3d503a03d Disconnect peers sending wtxidrelay message after VERACK (Suhas Daftuar) cacd85209e20fc0fd08f86eed23b6ef93484ffcf test: Use wtxid relay generally in functional tests (Fabian Jahr) 8d8099e97ab8af2126f6fbd223fbd82c52f2e85e test: Add tests for wtxid tx relay in segwit test (Fabian Jahr) 9a5392fdf67f1c5c90f52d3cdb3dea4f35d1609f test: Update test framework p2p protocol version to 70016 (Fabian Jahr) dd78d1d641178b473ab1156b71a837b9e686792b Rename AddInventoryKnown() to AddKnownTx() (Suhas Daftuar) 4eb515574e1012bc8ea5dafc3042dcdf4c766f26 Make TX_WITNESS_STRIPPED its own rejection reason (Suhas Daftuar) 97141ca442daea8fc9c307cf81a02b38dcc28fd8 Delay getdata requests from peers using txid-based relay (Suhas Daftuar) 46d78d47dea345329ba094310eec56ab00a02ddc Add p2p message "wtxidrelay" (Suhas Daftuar) 2d282e0cba9761574b6b43d134ca95f3052d7fd2 ignore non-wtxidrelay compliant invs (Anthony Towns) ac88e2eb619821ad7ae1d45d4b40be69051d3999 Add support for tx-relay via wtxid (Suhas Daftuar) 8e68fc246d09f1e6c6dfa8c676969d97c2eb4334 Add wtxids to recentRejects instead of txids (Suhas Daftuar) 144c38582042c3b9ec53bb97ba0644fc0114f8fb Add wtxids of confirmed transactions to bloom filter (Suhas Daftuar) 85c78d54af462996a0bca6cf97f91e1aa8778ae8 Add wtxid-index to orphan map (Suhas Daftuar) 08b39955ec7f84e835ab0b1366f0dd28dfd6ce03 Add a wtxid-index to mapRelay (Suhas Daftuar) 60f0acda713e7b9dc188aef54ef93981a93f4e44 Just pass a hash to AddInventoryKnown (Suhas Daftuar) c7eb6b4f1fe5bd76388a023529977674534334a7 Add wtxid to mempool unbroadcast tracking (Amiti Uttarwar) 2b4b90aa8f0440deacefb5997d7bd1f9f5c591b3 Add a wtxid-index to the mempool (Suhas Daftuar) Pull request description: Using txids (a transaction's hash, without witness) for transaction relay is problematic, post-segwit -- if a peer gives us a segwit transaction that fails policy checks, it could be because the txid associated with the transaction is definitely unacceptable to our node (regardless of the witness), or it could be that the transaction was malleated and with a different witness, the txid could be accepted to our mempool. We have a bloom filter of recently rejected transactions, whose purpose is to help us avoid redownloading and revalidating transactions that fail to be accepted, but because of this potential for witness malleability to interfere with relay of valid transactions, we do not use the filter for segwit transactions. This issue is discussed at some length in #8279. The effect of this is that whenever a segwit transaction that fails policy checks is relayed, a node would download that transaction from every peer announcing it, because it has no way presently to cache failure. Historically this hasn't been a big problem, but if/when policy for accepting segwit transactions were to change (eg taproot, or any other change), we could expect older nodes talking to newer nodes to be wasting bandwidth because of this. As discussed in that issue, switching to wtxid-based relay solves this problem -- by using an identifier for a transaction that commits to all the data in our relay protocol, we can be certain if a transaction that a peer is announcing is one that we've already tried to process, or if it's something new. This PR introduces support for wtxid-based relay with peers that support it (and remains backwards compatible with peers that use txids for relay, of course). Apart from code correctness, one issue to be aware of is that by downloading from old and new peers alike, we should expect there to be some bandwidth wasted, because sometimes we might download the same transaction via txid-relay as well as wtxid-relay. The last commit in this PR implements a heuristic I want to analyze, which is to just delay relay from txid-relay peers by 2 seconds, if we have at least 1 wtxid-based peer. I've just started running a couple nodes with this heuristic so I can measure how well it works, but I'm open to other ideas for minimizing that issue. In the long run, I think this will be essentially a non-issue, so I don't think it's too big a concern, we just need to bite the bullet and deal with it during upgrade. Finally, this proposal would need a simple BIP describing the changes, which I haven't yet drafted. However, review and testing of this code in the interim would be welcome. To do items: - [x] Write BIP explaining the spec here (1 new p2p message for negotiating wtxid-based relay, along with a new INV type) - [ ] Measure and evaluate a heuristic for minimizing how often a node downloads the same transaction twice, when connected to old and new nodes. ACKs for top commit: naumenkogs: utACK 0a4f1422cd1c20e12a05d7ff1a2ef1d5e7c654bb laanwj: utACK 0a4f1422cd1c20e12a05d7ff1a2ef1d5e7c654bb Tree-SHA512: d8eb8f0688cf0cbe9507bf738e143edab1f595551fdfeddc2b6734686ea26e7f156b6bfde38bad8bbbe8bec1857c7223e1687f8f018de7463dde8ecaa8f450df
2020-07-19Make TX_WITNESS_STRIPPED its own rejection reasonSuhas Daftuar
Previously, TX_WITNESS_MUTATED could be returned during transaction validation for either transactions that had a witness that was non-standard, or for transactions that had no witness but were invalid due to segwit validation rules. However, for txid/wtxid-relay considerations, net_processing distinguishes the witness stripped case separately, because it affects whether a wtxid should be able to be added to the reject filter. It is safe to add the wtxid of a witness-mutated transaction to the filter (as that wtxid shouldn't collide with the txid, and hence it wouldn't interfere with transaction relay from txid-relay peers), but it is not safe to add the wtxid (== txid) of a witness-stripped transaction to the filter, because that would interfere with relay of another transaction with the same txid (but different wtxid) when relaying from txid-relay peers. Also updates the comment explaining this logic, and explaining that we can get rid of this complexity once there's a sufficient deployment of wtxid-relaying peers on the network.
2020-07-15refactor: Switch ValidationState mode to C++11 enum classMarcoFalke
2020-05-26refactor: replace pointers by references within tx_verify.{h,cpp}Sebastian Falbesoner
affects "prevHeights" parameter of the functions - CalculateSequenceLocks() - SequenceLocks()
2020-04-16scripted-diff: Bump copyright headersMarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- ./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./ -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2020-03-18Update merkle.cpp4d55397500
Change comment from `The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given time is odd`, to ` The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given level is odd` (to be a bit more precise)
2020-02-27Templatize ValidationState instead of subclassingJeffrey Czyz
This removes boilerplate code in the subclasses which otherwise only differ by the result type.
2020-02-27Remove ValidationState's constructorJeffrey Czyz
2020-02-27Refactor FormatStateMessage into ValidationStateJeffrey Czyz
2019-12-30scripted-diff: Bump copyright of files changed in 2019MarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- ./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./ -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2019-11-27net: Fix uninitialized read in ProcessMessage(...)practicalswift
2019-10-29[validation] Remove fMissingInputs from AcceptToMemoryPool()John Newbery
Handle this failure in the same way as all other failures: call Invalid() with the reasons for the failure.
2019-10-29[validation] Remove useless ret parameter from Invalid()John Newbery
ValidationState::Invalid() takes a parameter `ret` which is returned to the caller. All call sites set this to false. Remove the `ret` parameter and just return false always.
2019-10-29[validation] Tidy Up ValidationResult classJohn Newbery
Minor style fixups and comment updates. This is purely a style change. There is no change in behavior.
2019-10-29[validation] Add CValidationState subclassesJohn Newbery
Split CValidationState into TxValidationState and BlockValidationState to store validation results for transactions and blocks respectively.
2019-10-24consensus: Explain why fCheckDuplicateInputs can not be skipped and remove itMarcoFalke
2019-10-24Merge #17004: validation: Remove REJECT code from CValidationStateWladimir J. van der Laan
9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery) 04a2f326ec0f06fb4fce1c4f93500752f05dede8 [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery) e9d5a59e34ff2d538d8f5315efd9908bf24d0fdc [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery) 0053e16714323c1694c834fdca74f064a1a33529 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery) a1a07cfe99fc8cee30ba5976dc36b47b1f6532ab [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery) Pull request description: We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set a REJECT code in the CValidationState object. Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`, then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it wasn't previously: - when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`. - when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`. Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in ATMP. This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579ba8cc7b684105c6a08263992b08d52. ACKs for top commit: ariard: ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits fjahr: ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments. ryanofsky: Code review ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
2019-10-15Remove unused includespracticalswift
2019-10-10[validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationStateJohn Newbery
We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set a REJECT code in the CValidationState object.
2019-09-27Merge #16713: Ignore old versionbit activations to avoid 'unknown softforks' ↵MarcoFalke
warning fdb3e8f8b27e3b0b2f88c32915975c6e4c299b1e Ignore old versionbit activations (Anthony Towns) Pull request description: PR 16060 removed the CSV and Segwit BIP9 softfork definitions and hard-coded ('buried') the activation heights. The versionbits code will warn users if an undefined softfork has been signalled in block header versions, and removing the CSV/Segwit definitions caused those warnings to be triggered. Change the BIP 9 warning code to only check for unknown softforks after the segwit activation height. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK fdb3e8f8b2 ajtowns: ACK fdb3e8f8b27e3b0b2f88c32915975c6e4c299b1e for what it's worth achow101: ACK fdb3e8f8b27e3b0b2f88c32915975c6e4c299b1e Sjors: ACK fdb3e8f8b27e3b0b2f88c32915975c6e4c299b1e. It makes the bit 0 warning go away in mainnet and testnet QT when a new block arrives. I think the code is clear enough. jonatack: ACK fdb3e8f8b27e3b0b2f88c32915975c6e4c299b1e Tree-SHA512: e6fd34e8902f8c7affb28e8951803e47d542710d5f1229000746656a37ee59d754439fc33e36b7eef87544262e5aac374645db91b74cb507e73514003ca7a67f
2019-09-18Merge #14696: qa: Add explicit references to related CVE's in ↵Wladimir J. van der Laan
p2p_invalid_block test. 0c62e3aa73839e97e65a3155e06a98d84b700a1e New regression testing for CVE-2018-17144, CVE-2012-2459, and CVE-2010-5137. (lucash-dev) 38bfca6bb2ad68719415e9c54a981441052da072 Added comments referencing multiple CVEs in tests and production code. (lucash-dev) Pull request description: This functional test includes two scenarios that test for regressions of vulnerabilities, but they are only briefly described. There are freely available documents explaining in detail the issues, but without explicit mentions, the developer trying to maintain the code needs an additional step of digging in commit history and PR conversations to figure it out. Added comments to explicitly mention CVE-2018-17144 and CVE-2012-2459, for more complete documentation. This improves developer experience by making understanding the tests easier. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK 0c62e3aa73839e97e65a3155e06a98d84b700a1e, checked the CVE numbers, thanks for adding documentation Tree-SHA512: 3ee05351745193b8b959e4a25d50f25a693b2d24b0732ed53cf7d5882df40b5dd0f1877bd5c69cffb921d4a7acf9deb3cc1160b96dc730d9b5984151ad06b7c9
2019-09-05Ignore old versionbit activationsAnthony Towns
Adds a hardcoded height to the consensus chain parameters for ignoring versionbit activations prior to a fixed height.
2019-08-14[Consensus] Bury segwit deploymentJohn Newbery
Hardcode segwit deployment height to 481824 for mainnet.
2019-08-14[Consensus] Bury CSV deployment heightJohn Newbery
Hard code CSV deployment height to 419328 for mainnet.
2019-06-02Added comments referencing multiple CVEs in tests and production code.lucash-dev
This commit adds comments referencing multiple CVEs both in production and test code. CVEs covered in this commit: CVE-2010-5137 CVE-2010-5139 CVE-2010-5141 CVE-2012-1909 CVE-2012-2459 CVE-2012-3789 CVE-2018-17144
2019-06-02Make reasoning about dependencies easier by not including unused dependenciespracticalswift
2019-05-02Separate reason for premature spends (coinbase/locktime)Suhas Daftuar
2019-05-02Assert validation reasons are contextually correctSuhas Daftuar
2019-05-02[refactor] Drop unused state.DoS(), state.GetDoS(), state.CorruptionPossible()Matt Corallo
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
2019-05-02scripted-diff: Remove DoS calls to CValidationStateMatt Corallo
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i 's/\.DoS(\(.*\), REJECT_\(.*\), \(true\|false\)/.DoS(\1, REJECT_\2/' src/validation.cpp src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp src/consensus/tx_check.cpp sed -i 's/state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), [^,]\+, state.GetDebugMessage())/state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), state.GetDebugMessage())/' src/validation.cpp sed -i 's/\.DoS([^,]*, /.Invalid\(/' src/validation.cpp src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp src/consensus/tx_check.cpp -END VERIFY SCRIPT- Co-authored-by: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
2019-05-02[refactor] Prep for scripted-diff by removing some \ns which annoy sed.Matt Corallo
2019-05-02Allow use of state.Invalid() for all reasonsMatt Corallo
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
2019-05-02[refactor] Drop redundant nDoS, corruptionPossible, SetCorruptionPossibleMatt Corallo
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
2019-05-02[refactor] Add useful-for-dos "reason" field to CValidationStateMatt Corallo
This is a first step towards cleaning up our DoS interface - make validation return *why* something is invalid, and let net_processing figure out what that implies in terms of banning/disconnection/etc. Behavior change: peers will now be banned for providing blocks with premature coinbase spends. Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au> Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
2019-05-02Clean up banning levelsMatt Corallo
Compared with previous bans, the following changes are made: * Txn with empty vin/vout or null prevouts move from 10 DoS points to 100. * Loose transactions with a dependency loop now result in a ban instead of 10 DoS points. * Many pre-segwit soft-fork errors now result in a ban. Note: Transactions that violate soft-fork script flags since P2SH do not generally result in a ban. Also, banning behavior for invalid blocks is dependent on whether the node is validating with multiple script check threads, due to a long- standing bug. That inconsistency is still present after this commit. * Proof of work failure moves from 50 DoS points to a ban. * Blocks with timestamps under MTP now result in a ban, blocks too far in the future continue to *not* result in a ban. * Inclusion of non-final transactions in a block now results in a ban instead of 10 DoS points. Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
2019-05-02[refactor] drop IsInvalid(nDoSOut)Matt Corallo
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
2019-05-02[refactor] Refactor misbehavior ban decisions to MaybePunishNode()Matt Corallo
Isolate the decision of whether to ban a peer to one place in the code, rather than having it sprinkled throughout net_processing. Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au> Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com> John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
2019-04-09[build] Move CheckTransaction from lib_server to lib_consensusJohn Newbery
CheckTransaction is a context-free function that does not require access to the blockchain or mempool. Move it from src/consensus/tx_verify in lib_server to a new unit src/consensus/tx_check in lib_consensus so that it can be called by non-server libraries.
2018-12-29Update copyright headers to 2018DrahtBot
2018-11-04scripted-diff: Move util files to separate directory.Jim Posen
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- mkdir -p src/util git mv src/util.h src/util/system.h git mv src/util.cpp src/util/system.cpp git mv src/utilmemory.h src/util/memory.h git mv src/utilmoneystr.h src/util/moneystr.h git mv src/utilmoneystr.cpp src/util/moneystr.cpp git mv src/utilstrencodings.h src/util/strencodings.h git mv src/utilstrencodings.cpp src/util/strencodings.cpp git mv src/utiltime.h src/util/time.h git mv src/utiltime.cpp src/util/time.cpp sed -i 's/<util\.h>/<util\/system\.h>/g' $(git ls-files 'src/*.h' 'src/*.cpp') sed -i 's/<utilmemory\.h>/<util\/memory\.h>/g' $(git ls-files 'src/*.h' 'src/*.cpp') sed -i 's/<utilmoneystr\.h>/<util\/moneystr\.h>/g' $(git ls-files 'src/*.h' 'src/*.cpp') sed -i 's/<utilstrencodings\.h>/<util\/strencodings\.h>/g' $(git ls-files 'src/*.h' 'src/*.cpp') sed -i 's/<utiltime\.h>/<util\/time\.h>/g' $(git ls-files 'src/*.h' 'src/*.cpp') sed -i 's/BITCOIN_UTIL_H/BITCOIN_UTIL_SYSTEM_H/g' src/util/system.h sed -i 's/BITCOIN_UTILMEMORY_H/BITCOIN_UTIL_MEMORY_H/g' src/util/memory.h sed -i 's/BITCOIN_UTILMONEYSTR_H/BITCOIN_UTIL_MONEYSTR_H/g' src/util/moneystr.h sed -i 's/BITCOIN_UTILSTRENCODINGS_H/BITCOIN_UTIL_STRENCODINGS_H/g' src/util/strencodings.h sed -i 's/BITCOIN_UTILTIME_H/BITCOIN_UTIL_TIME_H/g' src/util/time.h sed -i 's/ util\.\(h\|cpp\)/ util\/system\.\1/g' src/Makefile.am sed -i 's/utilmemory\.\(h\|cpp\)/util\/memory\.\1/g' src/Makefile.am sed -i 's/utilmoneystr\.\(h\|cpp\)/util\/moneystr\.\1/g' src/Makefile.am sed -i 's/utilstrencodings\.\(h\|cpp\)/util\/strencodings\.\1/g' src/Makefile.am sed -i 's/utiltime\.\(h\|cpp\)/util\/time\.\1/g' src/Makefile.am sed -i 's/-> util ->/-> util\/system ->/' test/lint/lint-circular-dependencies.sh sed -i 's/src\/util\.cpp/src\/util\/system\.cpp/g' test/lint/lint-format-strings.py test/lint/lint-locale-dependence.sh sed -i 's/src\/utilmoneystr\.cpp/src\/util\/moneystr\.cpp/g' test/lint/lint-locale-dependence.sh sed -i 's/src\/utilstrencodings\.\(h\|cpp\)/src\/util\/strencodings\.\1/g' test/lint/lint-locale-dependence.sh sed -i 's/src\\utilstrencodings\.cpp/src\\util\\strencodings\.cpp/' build_msvc/libbitcoinconsensus/libbitcoinconsensus.vcxproj -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2018-09-11Drop unused GetType() from CSizeComputerBen Woosley
2018-07-27Update copyright headers to 2018DrahtBot