| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/nChainTx/m_chain_tx_count/g' $(git grep -l 'nChainTx' ./src)
sed -i 's/nTxCount/tx_count/g' $(git grep -l 'nTxCount' ./src)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
Also update types of assumeutxo chainparams and some related local variables for
consistency.
Co-authored-by: russeree <reese.russell@ymail.com>
|
|
|
|
Flag adds complexity and is not currently used for anything.
|
|
The `PopulateAndValidateSnapshot` function introduced in
f6e2da5fb7c6406c37612c838c998078ea8d2252 from #19806 has been setting fake
`nTx` and `nChainTx` values that can show up in RPC results (see #29328) and
make `CBlockIndex` state hard to reason about, because it is difficult to know
whether the values are real or fake.
Revert to previous behavior of setting `nTx` and `nChainTx` to 0 when the
values are unknown, instead of faking them.
This commit fixes at least two assert failures in the (pindex->nChainTx ==
pindex->nTx + prev_chain_tx) check that would happen previously. Tests for
these failures are added separately in the next two commits.
Compatibility note: This change could result in -checkblockindex failures if a
snapshot was loaded by a previous version of Bitcoin Core and not fully
validated, because fake nTx values will have been saved to the block index. It
would be pretty easy to avoid these failures by adding some compatibility code
to `LoadBlockIndex` and changing `nTx` values from 1 to 0 when they are fake
(when `(pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_VALID_MASK) < BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS`), but a
little simpler not to worry about being compatible in this case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Commits of previous years:
- 2021: f47dda2c58b5d8d623e0e7ff4e74bc352dfa83d7
- 2020: fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
- 2019: aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
|
|
Copy construction of CBlockIndex objects is a footgun because of the
wide use of equality-by-pointer comparison in the code base. There are
also potential lifetime confusions of using copied instances, since
there are recursive pointer references (e.g. pprev).
We can't just delete the copy constructors because they are used for
derived classes (CDiskBlockIndex), so we mark them protected.
Delete move constructors and declare the destructor to satisfy the
"rule of 5."
|
|
This introduces an insignificant performance penalty, as it means locator
construction needs to use the skiplist-based CBlockIndex::GetAncestor()
function instead of the lookup-based CChain, but avoids the need for
callers to have access to a relevant CChain object.
|
|
To be used in the next commit
|
|
|
|
which allows dropping tinyformat.h from the header file.
|
|
and mark the inherited CBlockIndex#GetBlockHash public interface member
as deleted, to disallow calling it in the derived CDiskBlockIndex class.
Here is a failing test on master demonstrating the inconsistent behavior of the
current design: calling the same inherited public interface functions on the
same CDiskBlockIndex object should yield identical behavior.
```diff
diff --git a/src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp b/src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp
index 6dc522b421..dac3840f32 100644
--- a/src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp
@@ -240,6 +240,15 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(chainstatemanager_activate_snapshot, TestChain100Setup)
const CBlockIndex* tip = chainman.ActiveTip();
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(tip->nChainTx, au_data.nChainTx);
+ // CDiskBlockIndex "is a" CBlockIndex, as it publicly inherits from it.
+ // Test that calling the same inherited interface functions on the same
+ // object yields identical behavior.
+ CDiskBlockIndex index{tip};
+ CBlockIndex *pB = &index;
+ CDiskBlockIndex *pD = &index;
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pB->GetBlockHash(), pD->GetBlockHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pB->ToString(), pD->ToString());
+
```
The GetBlockHash() test assertion only passes on master because the different
methods invoked by the current design happen to return the same result. If one
of the two is changed, it fails like the ToString() assertion does.
Redefining inherited non-virtual functions is well-documented as incorrect
design to avoid inconsistent behavior (see Scott Meyers, "Effective C++", Item
36). Class usage is confusing when the behavior depends on the pointer
definition instead of the object definition (static binding happening where
dynamic binding was expected). This can lead to unsuspected or hard-to-track
bugs.
Outside of critical hot spots, correctness usually comes before optimisation,
but the current design dates back to main.cpp and it may possibly have been
chosen to avoid the overhead of dynamic dispatch. This solution does the same:
the class sizes are unchanged and no vptr or vtbl is added.
There are better designs for doing this that use composition instead of
inheritance or that separate the public interface from the private
implementations. One example of the latter would be a non-virtual public
interface that calls private virtual implementation methods, i.e. the Template
pattern via the Non-Virtual Interface (NVI) idiom.
|
|
and mark its inherited CBlockIndex#ToString public interface member
as deleted, to disallow calling it in the derived CDiskBlockIndex class.
|
|
and remove a now-redundant assert preceding a GetBlockHash() caller.
This protects against UB here, and in case of failure (which would
indicate a consensus bug), the debug log will print
bitcoind: chain.h:265: uint256 CBlockIndex::GetBlockHash() const: Assertion `phashBlock != nullptr' failed.
Aborted
instead of
Segmentation fault
|
|
|
|
fa832103aaa61e93b78ece9dd68c245a41afa6b6 Avoid integer sanitizer warnings in chain.o (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The two changes make the code more self-documenting and also allow to remove 5 file-wide suppressions for the module
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK fa832103aaa61e93b78ece9dd68c245a41afa6b6
jonatack:
ACK fa832103aaa61e93b78ece9dd68c245a41afa6b6
Tree-SHA512: d32a06099c56eed9f69130a3209f989872acc593f849528acd7746ee6caa96688cc32de37e8e59ad5d25dcb8912e341f1a43e50642dadeff6ca7624d0873ad10
|
|
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Commits of previous years:
* 2020: fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
* 2019: aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
|
|
Also, other whitespace fixes in the touched file.
Can be trivially reviewed with "--ignore-all-space --word-diff-regex=. -U0".
|
|
|
|
due to SegWit
ef72e9bd4124645fe2d00521a71c1c298d760225 doc: nChainTx needs to become a 64-bit earlier due to SegWit (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
As of block 597,379 txcount is 460,596,047 (see `chainparams.cpp`), while `uint32` can handle up to 4,294,967,296.
Pre segwit the [minimum transaction size](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Maximum_transaction_rate) was 166 bytes, so the worst case number of transactions per block was ~6000. As the original source comment for `unsigned int nChainTx` says, that should last until the year 2030.
With SegWit the smallest possible transaction is 60 bytes (potentially increased to 65 with a future soft fork, see #15482), without a witness:
```
4 bytes version
1 byte input count
36 bytes outpoint
1 byte scriptSigLen (0x00)
0 bytes scriptSig
4 bytes sequence
1 byte output count
8 bytes value
1 byte scriptPubKeyLen
1 byte scriptPubKey (OP_TRUE)
4 bytes locktime
```
That puts the maximum number of transactions per block at 16,666 so we might have to deal with this as early as a block 827,450 in early 2024.
Given that it's a memory-only thing and we want to allow users many years to upgrade, I would suggest fixing this in v0.20 and back-porting it.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
re-ACK ef72e9bd4124645fe2d00521a71c1c298d760225
jarolrod:
ACK ef72e9bd4124645fe2d00521a71c1c298d760225
theStack:
ACK ef72e9bd4124645fe2d00521a71c1c298d760225
Tree-SHA512: d8509ba7641796cd82af156354ff3a12ff7ec0f7b11215edff6696e95f8ca0e3596f719f3492ac3acb4b0884ac4e5bddc76f107b656bc2ed95a8ef1b2b5d4f71
|
|
Instead of (ab)using the existing BLOCK_VALID_* flags to mark CBlockIndex entries which
we haven't yet fully validated (but assume validity for use with UTXO snapshot
loading), introduce a status flag that specifically marks an assumed-valid state.
This state is then removed in RaiseValidity() when the block has actually been
validated.
This distinction will allow us to make the necessary changes to various parts of the
system to facilitate assumeutxo/background chainstate validation but without leaking
details like snapshot height, as we had done previously.
Changes that actually make use of this flag follow in future commits.
|
|
* Rename RewindBlockIndex -> NeedsRedownload (follow-up to commit
d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd)
* Fix typos
* Inline comments about faking chain data to avoid duplicating them
|
|
|
|
Don't return null snapshotblockhash values to avoid caller complexity/confusion.
|
|
It was unused, and had UB
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
This removes the need for the GNU C++ extension of variadic macros.
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
|
|
|
|
As suggested in #14711, pass height to CChain::FindEarliestAtLeast to
simplify Chain interface by combining findFirstBlockWithTime and
findFirstBlockWithTimeAndHeight into one
Extend findearliestatleast_edge_test in consequence
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/CDiskBlockPos/FlatFilePos/g' $(git ls-files 'src/*.h' 'src/*.cpp')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
|
|
Since the default `nSequence` is `0xFFFFFFFE` and locktime is enabled,
the checking `wtx.is_final` is meaningless until the syncing has
completed.
|
