| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
bb3f79fbdcd792aff04b2bf111de13219cd9ad56 doc: Update libnatpmp info in dependencies.md (Hennadii Stepanov)
1a01a5dc8dfaed036f66b06c502dd86fe41868af doc: Update zlib info in dependencies.md (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Update docs according to the recent changes in the code:
- #21209 (zlib)
- #21376 (libnatpmp)
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK bb3f79fbdcd792aff04b2bf111de13219cd9ad56 - thanks for keeping this updated.
Tree-SHA512: 48350ad07700aa071ad6c34e4c161aaadc050488fc068cf478e9781d632828187962a4384c1b67c2344145a2c00c3e16cddd09259130af8e9e86cd76cd32900d
|
|
c180c911b88b2bd2baf2c9c2b24e276787ffb69b doc: revamp macOS build doc (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This PR makes the macOS build-docs more informative and adds in the following information:
- Proper descriptions and delineation of required/optional dependencies
- walk-through of optional dependencies
- configuration walk-through
- various other tidbits of information
This is a part of the efforts done in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20601 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20610 to update the docs and introduce some consistency between them.
This update does not add instructions for arm-based M1 Macbooks as I do not have one to test with. It would be nice to have someone follow up with an update containing instructions for arm-based Macs.
**Before/Master:** [render](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-osx.md)
**After/PR:** [render](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/c180c911b88b2bd2baf2c9c2b24e276787ffb69b/doc/build-osx.md)
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK c180c911b88b2bd2baf2c9c2b24e276787ffb69b - I still think these are getting too verbose and we're duplicating information all over the place; dependencies, configure options, combinations of options etc. However if people are happy to maintain them, I guess it's fine for now, and this revamping has already happened for some of the other build READMEs.
Tree-SHA512: 1440046c723fe80d4158e4a429e3aa8bd93570acb84ad202d5d24c749ab9a89a3aca8b61b49e75e042a4bf4317acd632d3906e1b5808a9052e74209256528b45
|
|
57ff5a42ab89c2774387b53248bbf5902de086b4 doc: specify minimum HWI version (Sjors Provoost)
03308b2bfaef5cdf2337a1e8f63edf043d98a7c0 rpc: don't require wallet for enumeratesigners (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
HWI just released 2.0. See https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI/releases/tag/2.0.0
As of #16546 we already rely on features that are in 2.0 and not in the previous 1.* releases:
* `--chain` param
This shouldn't be a problem, because HWI 2.0 has been released before we release v22.
Misc improvements:
* document that HWI 2.0 is required
* drop wallet requirement for `enumeratesigners`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK 57ff5a42ab89c2774387b53248bbf5902de086b4
Tree-SHA512: 3fb6ba20894e52a116f89525a5f5a1f61d363ccd904e1cffd0e6d095640fc6d2edf0388cd6ae20f83bbc31e5f458255ec090b6e823798d426eba3e45b4336bf9
|
|
|
|
fab633d2dbfed1efcc3a02061685d56327ae51fd doc: Update fuzzing docs for afl-clang-lto (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Update the docs to default to `afl-clang-lto`. The afl-gcc (and other afl legacy fuzz engines) are still supported, though discouraged.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fab633d2dbfed1efcc3a02061685d56327ae51fd - seems to work for me. Compiled and ran some fuzzers using Clang 11 on Bionic. Set `llvm-config` so that `clang-11` would be used over `clang` (10).
jarolrod:
ACK fab633d2dbfed1efcc3a02061685d56327ae51fd, tested on Ubuntu Focal
Tree-SHA512: 3d1969c167bea45a9d691f3b757f51213d550c9c1b895bed1fcf3c2f7345791787cfb13c376291b94eb3181caf4ae3126f4d01c7cebda7b2bb1c40a1294e9a68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This pr makes the macOS build docs more informative and adds in the following information:
- Proper descriptions and delineation of required/optional dependencies
- walk-through of optional dependencies
- configuration walk-through
- various other tid-bits of information
|
|
4899fa3abd740ab2dabb6724d85bf1d3510d9efe doc: Update build instructions for Fedora (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR updates build instructions for Fedora, as Fedora 33 has no `libdb4-devel` and `libdb4-cxx-devel` packages in its default repos.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 4899fa3abd740ab2dabb6724d85bf1d3510d9efe
Tree-SHA512: 0c23e2ce0ea690ed5eeaa56514d4246e0057a77b7c71f28af4ee1e480521d465122f81cea37cc773ce2db4fc189d5ab3c8f8ffdd65f150cc006390aa1e2a4ac8
|
|
Brew has updated such that qt now refers to Qt 6.0.1. If builders
install this, configure will not work pick up qt. For now, install
qt@5 (5.15.2), until required build system and likely source changes
are made.
|
|
The removed commit is wrong since v0.21.0.
|
|
Fedora 33 requires adding the Cheese third-party repo to install
libdb4-devel and libdb4-cxx-devel packages.
|
|
Introduce two new options to reach the I2P network:
* `-i2psam=<ip:port>` point to the I2P SAM proxy. If this is set then
the I2P network is considered reachable and we can make outgoing
connections to I2P peers via that proxy. We listen for and accept
incoming connections from I2P peers if the below is set in addition to
`-i2psam=<ip:port>`
* `-i2pacceptincoming` if this is set together with `-i2psam=<ip:port>`
then we accept incoming I2P connections via the I2P SAM proxy.
|
|
{sign,verify}message RPCs
a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f doc: release note for changed {sign,verify}message error codes (Sebastian Falbesoner)
9e399b9b2d386b28c0c0ff59fc75d31dbec31d9c test: check parameter validity in rpc_signmessage.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
e62f0c71f10def124b1c1219d790cef246a32c3e rpc: fix {sign,message}verify RPC errors for invalid address/signature (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
RPCs that accept address parameters usually return the intended error code `RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY` (-5) if a passed address is invalid. The two exceptions to the rule are `signmessage` and `verifymessage`, which return `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` (-3) in this case instead. Oddly enough `verifymessage` returns `RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY` when the _signature_ was malformed, where `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` would be more approriate.
This PR fixes these inaccuracies and as well adds tests to `rpc_signmessage.py` that check the parameter validity and error codes for the related RPCs `signmessagewithprivkey`, `signmessage` and `verifymessage`.
master branch:
```
$ ./bitcoin-cli signmessage invalid_addr message
error code: -3
error message:
Invalid address
$ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage invalid_addr dummy_sig message
error code: -3
error message:
Invalid address
$ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage 12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX invalid_sig message
error code: -5
error message:
Malformed base64 encoding
```
PR branch:
```
$ ./bitcoin-cli signmessage invalid_addr message
error code: -5
error message:
Invalid address
$ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage invalid_addr dummy_sig message
error code: -5
error message:
Invalid address
$ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage 12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX invalid_sig message
error code: -3
error message:
Malformed base64 encoding
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f
meshcollider:
utACK a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f
Tree-SHA512: bae0c4595a2603cea66090f6033785601837b45fd853052312b3a39d8520566c581994b68f693dd247c22586c638c3b7689c849085cce548cc36b9bf0e119d2d
|
|
faa06ecc9c357428f3fa7a8f86b41b1220809951 build: Bump minimum Qt version to 5.9.5 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Close #20104.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK faa06ecc9c357428f3fa7a8f86b41b1220809951
jarolrod:
ACK faa06ecc9c357428f3fa7a8f86b41b1220809951
fanquake:
ACK faa06ecc9c357428f3fa7a8f86b41b1220809951 - this should be ok to do now.
Tree-SHA512: 7295472b5fd37ffb30f044e88c39d375a5a5187d3f2d44d4e73d0eb0c7fd923cf9949c2ddab6cddd8c5da7e375fff38112b6ea9779da4fecce6f024d05ba9c08
|
|
|
|
|
|
f75e0c1edde39a91cc353b0102638e232def9476 doc: add external-signer.md (Sjors Provoost)
d4b0107d68a91ed4d1a5c78c8ca76251329d3f3c rpc: send: support external signer (Sjors Provoost)
245b4457cf9265190a05529a0a97e1cb258cca8a rpc: signerdisplayaddress (Sjors Provoost)
7ebc7c0215979c53b92a436acc8b5b607b8d735a wallet: ExternalSigner: add GetDescriptors method (Sjors Provoost)
fc5da520f5c72287f59823b8a6d748dda49c574a wallet: add GetExternalSigner() (Sjors Provoost)
259f52cc33817a00b91ec9c7d078c07b88db7ab4 test: external_signer wallet flag is immutable (Sjors Provoost)
2655197e1c2dea9536c32afe1482ced4a1f481e9 rpc: add external_signer option to createwallet (Sjors Provoost)
2700f09c4130af6167ce71f46960e92ca800e205 rpc: signer: add enumeratesigners to list external signers (Sjors Provoost)
07b7c940a7da138d55a484ef83fee19ebf58a867 rpc: add external signer RPC files (Sjors Provoost)
8ce7767071779a0170364e6426bd393ed71bf281 wallet: add ExternalSignerScriptPubKeyMan (Sjors Provoost)
157ea7c614950d61bfe405310e2aaabcee31f7a3 wallet: add external_signer flag (Sjors Provoost)
f3e6ce78fba2b31173fe7b606aa9edb5b615bff3 test: add external signer test (Sjors Provoost)
8cf543f96dcd6fdfac1367b9e2b1d7d51be8bb76 wallet: add -signer argument for external signer command (Sjors Provoost)
f7eb7ecc6750ab267a979d9268ce5b5d151c26de test: framework: add skip_if_no_external_signer (Sjors Provoost)
87a97941f667483bbf2ab00929e03a2199cb8a62 configure: add --enable-external-signer (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Big picture overview in [this gist](https://gist.github.com/Sjors/29d06728c685e6182828c1ce9b74483d).
This PR lets `bitcoind` call an arbitrary command `-signer=<cmd>`, e.g. a hardware wallet driver, where it can fetch public keys, ask to display an address, and sign a transaction (using PSBT under the hood).
It's design to work with https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI, which supports multiple hardware wallets. Any command with the same arguments and return values will work. It simplifies the manual procedure described [here](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI/blob/master/docs/bitcoin-core-usage.md).
Usage is documented in [doc/external-signer.md](
https://github.com/Sjors/bitcoin/blob/2019/08/hww-box2/doc/external-signer.md), which also describes what protocol a different signer binary should conform to.
Use `--enable-external-signer` to opt in, requires Boost::Process:
```
Options used to compile and link:
with wallet = yes
with gui / qt = no
external signer = yes
```
It adds the following RPC methods:
* `enumeratesigners`: asks <cmd> for a list of signers (e.g. devices) and their master key fingerprint
* `signerdisplayaddress <address>`: asks <cmd> to display an address
It enhances the following RPC methods:
* `createwallet`: takes an additional `external_signer` argument and fetches keys from device
* `send`: automatically sends transaction to device and waits
Usage TL&DR:
* clone HWI repo somewhere and launch `bitcoind -signer=../HWI/hwi.py`
* check if you can see your hardware device: `bitcoin-cli enumeratesigners`
* create wallet and auto import keys `bitcoin-cli createwallet "hww" true true "" true true true`
* display address on device: `bitcoin-cli signerdisplayaddress ...`
* to spend, use `send` RPC and approve transaction on device
Prerequisites:
- [x] #21127 load wallet flags before everything else
- [x] #21182 remove mostly pointless BOOST_PROCESS macro
Potentially useful followups:
- GUI support: bitcoin-core/gui#4
- bumpfee support
- (automatically) verify (a subset of) keys on the device after import, through message signing
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK f75e0c1edde39a91cc353b0102638e232def9476
Tree-SHA512: 7db8afd54762295c1424c3f01d8c587ec256a72f34bd5256e04b21832dabd5dc212be8ab975ae3b67de75259fd569a561491945750492f417111dc7b6641e77f
|
|
|
|
25c57d640992255ed67964a44b17afbfd4bed0cf [doc] Add a note about where lock annotations should go. (Amiti Uttarwar)
ad5f01b96045f304b6cf9100879592b835c49c40 [validation] Move the lock annotation from function definition to declaration (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
Based on reviewing #21188
the first commit switches the lock annotations on `CheckInputScripts` to be on the function declaration instead of on the function definition. this ensures that all call sites are checked, not just ones that come after the definition.
the second commit adds a note to the developer-notes section to clarify where the annotations should be applied.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 25c57d640992255ed67964a44b17afbfd4bed0cf 🥘
promag:
Code review ACK 25c57d640992255ed67964a44b17afbfd4bed0cf.
Tree-SHA512: 61b6ef856bf6c6016d535fbdd19daf57b9e59fe54a1f30d47282a071b9b9d60b2466b044ee57929e0320cb1bdef52e7a1687cacaa27031bbc43d058ffffe22ba
|
|
This option replaces --with-boost-process
This prepares external signer support to be disabled by default.
It adds a configure option to enable this feature and to check
if Boost::Process is present.
This also exposes ENABLE_EXTERNAL_SIGNER to the test suite via test/config.ini
|
|
c5da2749e2f7375e292fb0982e8e252ae1adbce3 build: actually stop configure if Boost isn't available (fanquake)
cad8b527eaf7a93877e2249960866fd4db2d1c14 build: explicitly install libboost-dev package (fanquake)
Pull request description:
If Boost is not found via AX_BOOST_BASE, we don't actually stop
configuring, only a warning is emitted:
```bash
checking for boostlib >= 1.58.0 (105800)... configure: We could not detect the boost libraries (version MINIMUM_REQUIRED_BOOST or higher). If you have a staged boost library (still not installed) please specify $BOOST_ROOT in your environment and do not give a PATH to --with-boost option. If you are sure you have boost installed, then check your version number looking in <boost/version.hpp>. See http://randspringer.de/boost for more documentation.
```
Instead we usually fail when one of the other AX_BOOST_* macros fails to find a library. These macros are slowly being
removed, and in any case, it makes more sense to fail earlier if Boost is missing.
If Boost is unavailable, the failure now looks like:
```bash
checking for boostlib >= 1.58.0 (105800)... configure: We could not detect the boost libraries (version 1.58.0 or higher). If you have a staged boost library (still not installed) please specify $BOOST_ROOT in your environment and do not give a PATH to --with-boost option. If you are sure you have boost installed, then check your version number looking in <boost/version.hpp>. See http://randspringer.de/boost for more documentation.
configure: error: Boost is not available!
```
Note that we now just pass the version into AX_BOOST_BASE, which fixes it's display in the output (rather than showing `MINIMUM_REQUIRED_BOOST`).
This PR also has a commit that adds `libboost-dev` to our install instructions and CI. This package is currently installed as a side-effect of installing our other libboost-*-dev packages. However as those continue to disappear, it makes sense to install boost-dev explicitly.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK c5da2749e2f7375e292fb0982e8e252ae1adbce3
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK c5da2749e2f7375e292fb0982e8e252ae1adbce3
Tree-SHA512: f866062f9d7d3a2316b6c887f17c664b9cfff41fdc0cb99ca79d641240fb01a5ae0d34140e515bc465219e1b43d5ca84f7c55f48b9c5b45a80ff2795dafd072b
|
|
|
|
Honggfuzz NetDriver
fd0be92cff6a4b5e343e6ddae7481868354b9869 doc: Add instructions on how to fuzz the P2P layer using Honggfuzz NetDriver (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add instructions on how to fuzz the P2P layer using [Honggfuzz NetDriver](http://blog.swiecki.net/2018/01/fuzzing-tcp-servers.html).
Honggfuzz NetDriver allows for very easy fuzzing of TCP servers such as Bitcoin Core without having to write any custom fuzzing harness. The `bitcoind` server process is largely fuzzed without modification.
This makes the fuzzing highly realistic: a bug reachable by the fuzzer is likely also remotely triggerable by an untrusted peer.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 9e98cb30f00664c00c8ff9fd224ff9822bff3fd849652172df48dbaeade1dd1a5fc67ae53203f1966a1d4210671b35656009a2d8b84affccf3ddf1fd86124f6e
|
|
This package is currently installed as a side-effect of installing our
other libboost-*-dev packages. However as those continue to dissapear,
it makes sense to install boost dev explicitly.
|
|
aa929abf8dc022e900755234c857541faeea8239 [docs] Update developer notes to discourage very long lines (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Mandatory rules on line lengths are bad - there will always be cases where a longer line is more readable than the alternative.
However, very long lines for no good reason _do_ hurt readability. For example, this declaration in validation.h is 274 chars:
```c++
bool ConnectTip(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex* pindexNew, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock, ConnectTrace& connectTrace, DisconnectedBlockTransactions& disconnectpool) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main, m_mempool.cs);
```
That won't fit on one line without wrapping on my 27" monitor with a comfortable font size. Much easier to read is something like:
```c++
bool ConnectTip(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams,
CBlockIndex* pindexNew, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock,
ConnectTrace& connectTrace, DisconnectedBlockTransactions& disconnectpool)
EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main, m_mempool.cs);
```
Therefore, _discourage_ (don't forbid) line lengths greater than 100 characters in our developer style guide.
100 chars is somewhat arbitrary. The old standard was 80, but that seems very limiting with modern displays.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK aa929abf8dc022e900755234c857541faeea8239 - this is basically just something to point too when a PR has unreasonably long lines for no particularly reason.
practicalswift:
ACK aa929abf8dc022e900755234c857541faeea8239
amitiuttarwar:
ACK aa929abf8dc022e900755234c857541faeea8239
theStack:
ACK aa929abf8dc022e900755234c857541faeea8239
glozow:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/aa929abf8dc022e900755234c857541faeea8239
Tree-SHA512: 17f1b11f811137497ede8851ede93fa612dc622922b5ad7ac8f065ea026d9a718db5b92325754b74d24012b4d45c4e2cd5cd439a6a8d34bbabf5da927d783970
|
|
c943326d3c06e481c142b112c7e7a0c6ff5a76b3 doc/bips: Add BIPs 43, 44, 49, and 84 (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
If you don't like what they say, please suggest alternatives ;)
ACKs for top commit:
prusnak:
ACK c943326
Tree-SHA512: 7db93f8491289657ec45df30e557eb8572b35201eb29aed1b11bf3949924fce56b4e2d71e1f0acf5d24a01278c0dec99790d632f04c15117010c4ac564368d6b
|
|
|
|
060a2a64d40d75fecb60b7d2b9946a67e46aa6fc ci: remove boost thread installation (fanquake)
06e1d7d81d5a56d136c6fc88f09a2b0654a164f9 build: don't build or use Boost Thread (fanquake)
7097add83c8596f81be9edd66971ffd2486357eb refactor: replace Boost shared_mutex with std shared_mutex in sigcache (fanquake)
8e55981ef834490c438436719f95cbaf888c4914 refactor: replace Boost shared_mutex with std shared_mutex in cuckoocache tests (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This replaces `boost::shared_mutex` and `boost::unique_lock` with [`std::shared_mutex`](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/shared_mutex) & [`std::unique_lock`](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/unique_lock).
Even though [some concerns were raised](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16684#issuecomment-726214696) in #16684 with regard to `std::shared_mutex` being unsafe to use across some glibc versions, I still think this change is an improvement. As I mentioned in #21022, I also think trying to restrict standard library feature usage based on bugs in glibc is not only hard to do, but it's not currently clear exactly how we do that in practice (does it also extend to patching out use in our dependencies, should we be implementing more runtime checks for features we are using, when do we consider an affected glibc "old enough" not to worry about? etc). If you take a look through the [glibc bug tracker](https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/describecomponents.cgi?product=glibc) you'll no doubt find plenty of (active) bug reports for standard library code we already using. Obviously not to say we shouldn't try and avoid buggy code where possible.
Two other points:
[Cory mentioned in #21022](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21022#issuecomment-769274179):
> It also seems reasonable to me to worry that boost hits the same underlying glibc bug, and we've just not happened to trigger the right conditions yet.
Moving away from Boost to the standard library also removes the potential for differences related to Boosts configuration. Boost has multiple versions of `shared_mutex`, and what you end up using, and what it's backed by depends on:
* The version of Boost.
* The platform you're building for.
* Which version of `BOOST_THREAD_VERSION` is defined: (2,3,4 or 5) default=2. (see [here](https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_70_0/doc/html/thread/build.html#thread.build.configuration) for some of the differences).
* Is `BOOST_THREAD_V2_SHARED_MUTEX` defined? (not by default). If so, you might get the ["less performant, but more robust"](https://github.com/boostorg/thread/issues/230#issuecomment-475937761) version of `shared_mutex`.
A lot of these factors are eliminated by our use of depends, but users will have varying configurations. It's also not inconceivable to think that a distro, or some package manager might start defining something like `BOOST_THREAD_VERSION=3`. Boost tried to change the default from 2 to 3 at one point.
With this change, we no longer use Boost Thread, so this PR also removes it from depends, the build system, CI etc.
Previous similar PRs were #19183 & #20922. The authors are included in the commits here.
Also related to #21022 - pthread sanity checking.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 060a2a64d40d75fecb60b7d2b9946a67e46aa6fc
vasild:
ACK 060a2a64d40d75fecb60b7d2b9946a67e46aa6fc
Tree-SHA512: 572d14d8c9de20bc434511f20d3f431836393ff915b2fe9de5a47a02dca76805ad5c3fc4cceecb4cd43f3ba939a0508178c4e60e62abdbaaa6b3e8db20b75b03
|
|
e1604b3d50dca3291a432be59cfd03c0e846e7b2 doc: Replace tabs for spaces (Gunar C. Gessner)
98db48d3490e5863b4d89e03cebeece9bd1f91ae doc: Fix markdown formatting (Gunar Gessner)
Pull request description:
Lines were being joined making it hard to read.
ACKs for top commit:
RandyMcMillan:
ACK e1604b3d50dca3291a432be59cfd03c0e846e7b2
Tree-SHA512: fd5a7c5e9a1cbbf0fbb13b5c30b87853c84751da7f0fad08151bda07f1933872ab51cad29a0c0a70ced48e60df6d83bff3f84c2f77d00d22723fae9a8c3534fc
|
|
fa362064e383163a2585ffbc71ac1ea3bcc92663 rpc: Return total fee in mempool (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This avoids having to loop over the whole mempool to query each entry's fee
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa362064e383163a2585ffbc71ac1ea3bcc92663
glozow:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20944/commits/fa362064e383163a2585ffbc71ac1ea3bcc92663 🧸
jnewbery:
ACK fa362064e383163a2585ffbc71ac1ea3bcc92663
Tree-SHA512: e2fa1664df39c9e187f9229fc35764ccf436f6f75889c5a206d34fff473fc21efbf2bb143f4ca7895c27659218c22884d0ec4195e7a536a5a96973fc9dd82d08
|
|
4ed064dbd90b5f254c4637e8f820c75225958f1f docs: correctly identify script type (lisa neigut)
Pull request description:
Fix a typo.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 4ed064dbd90b5f254c4637e8f820c75225958f1f
darosior:
ACK 4ed064dbd90b5f254c4637e8f820c75225958f1f
theStack:
ACK 4ed064dbd90b5f254c4637e8f820c75225958f1f
Tree-SHA512: 94572fde89865a085020767f9de58f41c6b1c8f714c0bc6c256a4fc419a2693ce8a33d953d4c75542495ae72882d10846354db751770e85d3d694d88e0378843
|
|
fixes a typo
|
|
|
|
Lines were being joined making it hard to read.
|
|
51f3752fbeee09d025db33e154bb2efff9e20837 Add release notes for listdescriptors RPC (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Original PR is #20226
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 51f3752
jonasschnelli:
ACK 51f3752fbeee09d025db33e154bb2efff9e20837
Tree-SHA512: e8091d01b99a3effcd6c1738e7363a44858ba9bcf6bd99bf60f2025a25db83fc8d61354ab2002365b56071b9f3693c7d534153a259b5ebc91cbcf8d13f6555f1
|
|
Original PR is #20226
|
|
|
|
To make release tags the `make-tag.py` script from the maintainer tools
should be used. This ensures that all the various occurences of the
version in different files match the tagged version before proceeding.
Also replace other "ping wumpus" references.
|
|
Also, add missing lock annotations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve the description of what these options do with regards to
tor or network traffic.
Some of the wording is from a laanwj review in PR 19358.
|
|
Added instructions on how to generate the up to date RPC docs for the bitcoincore.org website in the relevant release-process subsection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
