Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
fa4943e8df2e1048a5030f1d93776ca2b9da7b8a doc: Add template for empty release notes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
* Move release process notes from the release notes to the release process documentation
* Clarify that wallet RPC or Settings related release notes snippets should not be duplicated. I think it should be sufficient to only mention them in the wallet section and leave them out from the general RPC section.
* Create an empty template to ensure the release notes can be cleared with a single `cp` command. Also, this ensures that the "no duplication" note isn't deleted again. (We used to have it in at least the 22.0 and 21.0 release notes: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-notes/release-notes-0.21.0.md#updated-settings , but it was lost in the 23.0 notes)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa4943e8df2e1048a5030f1d93776ca2b9da7b8a
Tree-SHA512: 808e100ee1e371f7746a479ddfb237c6895935cffefc0e49033505492a03288013d5c20386af30f2a7dca8ad0c0628bdb6673dcb5cc4fcf4d0183b0ec65ce941
|
|
|
|
|
|
87f54060ffffdb56c97594efdca378bace5323df doc: Swap gen-manpages and update RC steps in release process (laanwj)
42c202893b879d1bda54624d44c90b28143fc167 doc: Fix gen-manpages, rewrite in Python (laanwj)
Pull request description:
Rewrite the manual page generation script in Python.
This:
- solves '-' stripping issue (fixes #22681)
- makes that a copyright footer is generated correctly again
Also change the release process to swap gen-manpages and update RC steps, so that the pages will have the correct rc and/or final version.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
Code Review ACK 87f54060ffffdb56c97594efdca378bace5323df
fanquake:
ACK 87f54060ffffdb56c97594efdca378bace5323df - tested generating and opening the man pages locally, but didn't run through the release process. Will propose some changes to address consolidating the help / version output.
Tree-SHA512: 39254721ca84e4f223a321c554f2e08c36428b15019a0f9fa3eff408b4c6f1e1d74941143f4d2927427afa3ad7a7e6f999d6ec660132d817809b640a87ae9f7d
|
|
building docs
64645fa3e045ec30a57dbd416fcf66d4755f37c6 Release process: fix broken link to Guix building docs (Jeremy Rand)
Pull request description:
Not 100% sure whether this link was always broken or if the Guix docs renamed the heading at some point. Either way, seems good to fix it.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 64645fa3e045ec30a57dbd416fcf66d4755f37c6
Tree-SHA512: 4932059fe583c0d27c70febf8f4dd8cffd3e15567359c5429d2691e221afc6da319bf43ebcd264ae0f98302e1eeb67ffd763d3d7d06ab1633913555ee7461643
|
|
|
|
Avoids "does not appear to be a git repository" error.
Fixes #24329
|
|
|
|
Rewrite the manual page generation script in Python.
This:
- Solves '-' stripping issue (fixes #22681)
- Makes that copyright footer is generated again
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The uploaded binaries need to match the same flat directory structure of
the SHA256SUMS file in order for torrent downloaders to be able to
verify the download without moving files. Mention this in the release
process doc.
|
|
This allows us to remove the rfc4880 EOL hacks and release with a
SHA256SUMS.asc file that's a combination of all signer signatures.
|
|
One of the issues observed during the 22.0rc1 release process was that a
codesigner's attestation mismatched non-codesigner attestations because
the guix-codesign step was performed prior to tagging the version in
bitcoin-detached-sigs.
|
|
|
|
fac4814106c796b8786dd90053513cc35142dfe5 doc/release-process: Add torrent creation details (Carl Dong)
5d24cc3d82dad6812f8370c3ccc7c2b5a6c12c11 guix/INSTALL: Guix installs init scripts in libdir (Carl Dong)
5da2ee49d5b44de803b671aedbdd14e5c1d71ea9 guix/INSTALL: Add coreutils/inotify-dir-recreate troubleshooting (Carl Dong)
318c60700b7bbb7ec09a29bf037e7c2787646be6 guix: Adapt release-process.md to new Guix process (Carl Dong)
fcab35b2292f9221eaba521740e8b3b2511a8b78 guix-attest: Produce and sign normalized documents (Carl Dong)
c2541fd0ca99481a5a792a8f2772925d64fb0491 guix: Overhaul README (Carl Dong)
46ce6ce3782dfbd8f9d26dc2ba0f284755e75f2d tree-wide: Rename gitian-keys to builder-keys (Carl Dong)
fc4f8449f34e32b0b9ac9d218d6c3264b02467ba guix: Update various check_tools lists (Carl Dong)
263220a85c1df218431fafbda07c8b23ccc4ce4d guix: Check for a sane services database (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Based on: #21462
Keeping the README in one file so that it's easy to search through. Will add more jumping links later so navigation is easier.
Current TODOs:
- [x] Shell installer option: prompt user to re-login for `/etc/profile.d` entry to be picked up
- [x] Binary tarball option: prompt user to create `/etc/profile.d` entry and re-login
- [x] Fanquake docker option: complete section
- [x] Arch Linux AUR option: prompt to start `guix-daemon-latest` unit after finishing "optional setup" section
- [x] Building from source option: Insert dependency tree diagram that I made
- [x] Building from source option: redo sectioning, kind of a mess right now
- [x] Optional setup: make clear which parts are only needed if building from source
- [x] Workaround 1 for GnuTLS: perhaps mention how to remove Guix build farm's key
- [x] Overall (after everything): Make the links work.
Note to self: wherever possible, tell user how to check that something is true rather than branching by installation option.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fac4814106c796b8786dd90053513cc35142dfe5 - going to go ahead and merge this now. It's a lot of documentation, and could probably be nit-picked / improved further, however, that can continue over the next few weeks. I'm sure more (backportable) improvements / clarifications will be made while we progress through RCs towards a new release.
Tree-SHA512: dc46c0ecdfc67c7c7743ca26e4a603eb3f54adbf81be2f4c1f4c20577ebb84b5250b9c9ec89c0e9860337ab1c7cff94d7963c603287267deecfe1cd987fa070a
|
|
Source: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21711#discussion_r668754244
|
|
Also, clean up release-process.md
|
|
a16378e501199144b5aecda57d8bfbc014546764 doc: Remove unnecessary steps from translations update process (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
258492982386dac174461f641965c8d78fa6f1ce doc: Add steps for transifex to release process (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Document how to update settings on and for the transifex website before and after branch-off of a new release.
(This is #21440, updated with the review feedback.)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK a16378e501199144b5aecda57d8bfbc014546764
hebasto:
ACK a16378e501199144b5aecda57d8bfbc014546764
Tree-SHA512: 9669cc3bc7ba056f913ee77c2ef9d9ee2313da947fc07f8cd955807c34c5d39e3af73587adfe734274ab2412a7dfb1e2dfe7ee4904ca28cfef9bf8061d26a573
|
|
|
|
Document how to update settings on and for the transifex website before
and after branch-off of a new release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
To make release tags the `make-tag.py` script from the maintainer tools
should be used. This ensures that all the various occurences of the
version in different files match the tagged version before proceeding.
Also replace other "ping wumpus" references.
|
|
Added instructions on how to generate the up to date RPC docs for the bitcoincore.org website in the relevant release-process subsection.
|
|
|
|
Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which
we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The
revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor
version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to
being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was
accidentally not included in the version number.
The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously,
the Major version was 0 so that was never a factor in CLIENT_VERSION.
|
|
also:
- use the getblockheader (and getblockhash) RPCs instead of getblockchaininfo
for updating the nMinimumChainWork and defaultAssumeValid consensus params
- use "RPC" consistently
- update the example PR from 17002 to 20263
- improve a link with a named anchor tag
|
|
error: unknown switch `a'
usage: git add [<options>] [--] <pathspec>...
-n, --dry-run dry run
-v, --verbose be verbose
-i, --interactive interactive picking
-p, --patch select hunks interactively
-e, --edit edit current diff and apply
-f, --force allow adding otherwise ignored files
-u, --update update tracked files
--renormalize renormalize EOL of tracked files (implies -u)
-N, --intent-to-add record only the fact that the path will be added later
-A, --all add changes from all tracked and untracked files
--ignore-removal ignore paths removed in the working tree (same as --no-all)
--refresh don't add, only refresh the index
--ignore-errors just skip files which cannot be added because of errors
--ignore-missing check if - even missing - files are ignored in dry run
--chmod (+|-)x override the executable bit of the listed files
|
|
Also fixes a link to the macdeploy instructions.
|
|
|
|
fab2f351f2311295c9ed893fe883a08a9104144e doc: Update release process with latest changes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Mainly adding the reminder to bump the flatpak
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fab2f351f2311295c9ed893fe883a08a9104144e
fanquake:
ACK fab2f351f2311295c9ed893fe883a08a9104144e
Tree-SHA512: fe279a6cdee881e8dd608cb7d09d992c4b668b01b9d0d2dbfaf92f12f3032b8fcb2c256b20fcee861397451add1338f162b6e5fa7b3c21e76c247cc419315284
|
|
|
|
|
|
The original osslsigncode project (https://sourceforge.net/projects/osslsigncode/) has been marked as abandonware,
"This is now - and has been for a long while - abandonware. Feel free to create your own forks etc.".
However, a fork at https://github.com/mtrojnar/osslsigncode has emerged that has incorporated
theuni's patches, updated the tool to work with OpenSSL 1.1 and made other improvements.
This commit switches the windows signer descriptor to use this new version of osslsigncode.
|
|
Can be reviewed with the git diff option
--color-moved=dimmed-zebra
|
|
fa3a7331160d1a460b1c15fca1810e98070d629c chainparams: Bump assumed chain params (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
As every year, reviewers get extra point when their node is running:
* `assumevalid=0`
* `checkpoints=0`
* on non-x86_64 hardware
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-process.md#before-every-major-and-minor-release for the process.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa3a7331160d1a460b1c15fca1810e98070d629c
Sjors:
ACK fa3a7331160d1a460b1c15fca1810e98070d629c for mainnet on macOS 10.14.6.
jamesob:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17002/commits/fa3a7331160d1a460b1c15fca1810e98070d629c
fanquake:
ACK fa3a7331160d1a460b1c15fca1810e98070d629c - checked the mainnet values. I have notes on reviewing `assumevalid` updates in [core-review](https://github.com/fanquake/core-review/blob/master/update-assumevalid.md).
Tree-SHA512: fc545ba0a7056908040b47076b393d028c1c022967c25a2074752f76f0386ef099a64445da6125117a04418bd7eb0655121bfc94e6f60b7bc2666947491b5228
|
|
|
|
|
|
variables to release process
eb4c43e49f625895670866b89bb56ca641c4eeb7 doc: documents how to calculate m_assumed_blockchain_size and m_assumed_chain_state_size on the release process. (marcoagner)
Pull request description:
Regarding [this](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15183#issuecomment-463133734) on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15183.
Added an "Additional information" section for this which seems reasonable to me but may not be the best place for this. Also, let me know if anything else should be documented here (like more details).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK eb4c43e49f625895670866b89bb56ca641c4eeb7
Tree-SHA512: 7e6fc46740daa01dd9be5a8da7846e7a9f7fa866bf31fdc2cb252f90c698cfd6ef954f9588f7abcebda2355ec2b2a380635e14a164e53e77d38abefa3e2cc698
|
|
|
|
|
|
The riscv64 binary is created by the Gitian scripts and distributed by the
Bitcoin Core website, so it should be listed in the release process docs.
|
|
and reorganise the section and add relative url links.
Follow-up to e47dc4f.
|
|
- Create a release notes draft wiki for collaborative editing at https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki as seen for releases 0.17.0 and 0.18.0.
- As per http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-03-28.html#l-342, for the period during which the notes are being edited on the wiki, the version on the branch should be wiped and replaced with a link to the wiki which should be used for all announcements until final.
- Before final, remove the "Needs release note" label from relevant PRs/issues and merge the release notes from the wiki into the branch.
- Create a pinned meta-issue dedicated to testing the release candidate and communicate it in release announcements where useful. The former is done in practice (e.g. #15555, #14902) and the latter addresses the discussion here: https://x0f.org/web/statuses/101753569204220416.
- Adapt and merge the updates in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15692.
- Update the version numbers in all the examples.
- Reorganise the headers in the Branch Updates section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m_assumed_chain_state_size on the release process.
|