| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
I used Guix's values for the powerpc64(le) dynamic linkers, and the
/lib-prefix seems to be a Guix-ism rather than standard. The standard
path for the linker-loaders start with /lib64.
I've taken the new loader values from SYSDEP_KNOWN_INTERPRETER_NAMES in
glibc's sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/ldconfig.h file.
For future reference, loader path values can also be found on glibc's
website: https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/ABIList?action=recall&rev=16
Github-Pull: #23148
Rebased-From: b96adcbfae90b3e041754f11624cac04c1999e8c
|
|
======================================================================
ERROR: test_revocation_mode_soft (tests.test_validate.ValidateTests)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/guix-build-python-certvalidator-0.1-1.e5bdb4b.drv-0/source/tests/test_validate.py", line 85, in test_revocation_mode_soft
validate_path(context, path)
File "/tmp/guix-build-python-certvalidator-0.1-1.e5bdb4b.drv-0/source/tests/../certvalidator/validate.py", line 50, in validate_path
return _validate_path(validation_context, path)
File "/tmp/guix-build-python-certvalidator-0.1-1.e5bdb4b.drv-0/source/tests/../certvalidator/validate.py", line 358, in _validate_path
raise PathValidationError(pretty_message(
certvalidator.errors.PathValidationError: The path could not be validated because the end-entity certificate expired 2022-01-14 12:00:00Z
Github-Pull: #24057
Rebased-From: 85885919656a3f606f3d7f208378aabe95f3f62d
|
|
Previously, if the builder exported $VERSION in their environment (as
past Gitian-building docs told them to), but their HEAD does not
actually point to v$VERSION, their build outputs will differ from those
of other builders.
This is because the contrib/guix/guix-* scripts only ever act on the
current git worktree, and does not try to check out $VERSION if $VERSION
is set in the environment.
Setting $VERSION only makes the scripts pretend like the current
worktree is $VERSION.
This problem was seen in jonatack's attestation for all.SHA256SUMS,
where only his bitcoin-22.0rc3-osx-signed.dmg differed from everyone
else's.
Here is my deduced sequence of events:
1. Aug 27th: He guix-builds 22.0rc3 and uploads his attestations up to
guix.sigs
2. Aug 30th, sometime after POSIX time 1630310848: he pulls the latest
changes from master in the same worktree where he guix-built 22.0rc3
and ends up at 7be143a960e2
3. Aug 30th, sometime before POSIX time 1630315907: With his worktree
still on 7be143a960e2, he guix-codesigns. Normally, this would result
in outputs going in guix-build-7be143a960e2, but he had
VERSION=22.0rc3 in his environment, so the guix-* scripts pretended
like he was building 22.0rc3, and used 22.0rc3's guix-build directory
to locate un-codesigned outputs and dump codesigned ones.
However, our SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH defaults to the POSIX time of HEAD
(7be143a960e2), which made all timestamps in the resulting codesigned
DMG 1630310848, 7be143a960e2's POSIX timestamp. This differs from the
POSIX timestamp of 22.0rc3, which is 1630348517. Note that the
windows codesigning procedure does not consider SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.
We resolve this by only allowing VERSION overrides via the FORCE_VERSION
environment variable.
Github-Pull: #22847
Rebased-From: 96cc6bb04f7e173e1f7637b780ac00fc75486671
|
|
The SHA256SUMS file can be used in a sha256sum -c command to verify
downloaded binaries. However users are likely to download just a single
file and not place this file in the correct directory relative to the
SHA256SUMS file for the simple verification command to work. By not
including the directory name in the SHA256SUMS file, it will be easier
for users to verify downloaded binaries.
Co-authored-by: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
Github-Pull: bitcoin/bitcoin#22654
Rebased-From: fb17c99e35e72f3b21ec3b5473e84c21dc964776
|
|
This allows us to remove the rfc4880 EOL hacks and release with a
SHA256SUMS.asc file that's a combination of all signer signatures.
Github-Pull: bitcoin/bitcoin#22642
Rebased-From: 90b3e482e911fde73133a157c3b354471682275a
|
|
Previously, if verification fails, the correct message will be printed,
but the exit code would still be 0.
Github-Pull: bitcoin/bitcoin#22643
Rebased-From: d451b60d22576dff7a2c8d6a8b5880d9d69e397c
|
|
If the user has set log.showSignature=true in their git config, then the
git log will always output GPG signature information. Since git log is
used to set EPOCH_SOURCE_DATE, this will mistakenly have GPG signature
information in it which causes issues for the build. To avoid this
issue, we override the config and force log.showSignature=false.
Github-Pull: #22531
Rebased-From: 9b313dfef18792fcc36e78ef3caa693fafcce04e
|
|
guix-attest mistakenly added an extra \r to the line endings in
all.SHA256SUMS, causing guix-verify to erroneously fail.
Co-Authored-By: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
Github-Pull: #22531
Rebased-From: 43225f0a2a517ccd79dc49279b979ffd2eca6b85
|
|
When verifying guix attestations, it is useful to set a particular
signer's manifest as the base to compare against.
Github-Pull: #22531
Rebased-From: 4a466388a0092fbdf5f8969c6bfb65bf8cc962e1
|
|
Github-Pull: #22531
Rebased-From: 33455c76964b9e27b33e970d9722cc47657b291b
|
|
Github-Pull: #22538
Rebased-From: 198ceb82f91bfdeac6e143ca7433f4a524f6f36f
|
|
Github-Pull: #22538
Rebased-From: d7b7f610a53aa62bd82f6704a9c518a93c896963
|
|
Github-Pull: #22533
Rebased-From: 9f01feda0ad99d8600f9edee1f37594c5166a7b8
|
|
Github-Pull: #22511
Rebased-From: a884a1edcd1b795799f1be65df17462041741dc3
|
|
Github-Pull: #22511
Rebased-From: 3c4d2c418e62d421a8bd7640ef5384251c892406
|
|
to upstream 1.3.0 commit
e6a94d44469f90f4dc88a07a5a8587730811c705 guix: Bump to version-1.3.0 from upstream (Carl Dong)
90fd13b954a364963f58e6cd12962c6f1986f79b guix: Pin kernel header version (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
- Use 4.19 for riscv64 (earliest LTS release w/ riscv64 support)
- Use 4.9 for all others (second-oldest LTS release, released in
combination with glibc glibc 2.24 in Debian stretch)
```
```
The chosen commit is the HEAD of Guix's version-1.3.0 branch as of July
15th, 2021.
Also fix visual indenting.
```
-----
This + the documentation PR should make our Guix system ready for release!
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK e6a94d44469f90f4dc88a07a5a8587730811c705 to change to vanilla guix. Did not review the kernel change.
laanwj:
ACK e6a94d44469f90f4dc88a07a5a8587730811c705
fanquake:
ACK e6a94d44469f90f4dc88a07a5a8587730811c705
Tree-SHA512: a175e4ddb3ee786a39f5e800ce336932ad2f6797a3a28400a6f723875d0f19833fd36cedc41b3580e4604110517211bd9f557be36adf7265fd8e591c434ae032
|
|
fac4814106c796b8786dd90053513cc35142dfe5 doc/release-process: Add torrent creation details (Carl Dong)
5d24cc3d82dad6812f8370c3ccc7c2b5a6c12c11 guix/INSTALL: Guix installs init scripts in libdir (Carl Dong)
5da2ee49d5b44de803b671aedbdd14e5c1d71ea9 guix/INSTALL: Add coreutils/inotify-dir-recreate troubleshooting (Carl Dong)
318c60700b7bbb7ec09a29bf037e7c2787646be6 guix: Adapt release-process.md to new Guix process (Carl Dong)
fcab35b2292f9221eaba521740e8b3b2511a8b78 guix-attest: Produce and sign normalized documents (Carl Dong)
c2541fd0ca99481a5a792a8f2772925d64fb0491 guix: Overhaul README (Carl Dong)
46ce6ce3782dfbd8f9d26dc2ba0f284755e75f2d tree-wide: Rename gitian-keys to builder-keys (Carl Dong)
fc4f8449f34e32b0b9ac9d218d6c3264b02467ba guix: Update various check_tools lists (Carl Dong)
263220a85c1df218431fafbda07c8b23ccc4ce4d guix: Check for a sane services database (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Based on: #21462
Keeping the README in one file so that it's easy to search through. Will add more jumping links later so navigation is easier.
Current TODOs:
- [x] Shell installer option: prompt user to re-login for `/etc/profile.d` entry to be picked up
- [x] Binary tarball option: prompt user to create `/etc/profile.d` entry and re-login
- [x] Fanquake docker option: complete section
- [x] Arch Linux AUR option: prompt to start `guix-daemon-latest` unit after finishing "optional setup" section
- [x] Building from source option: Insert dependency tree diagram that I made
- [x] Building from source option: redo sectioning, kind of a mess right now
- [x] Optional setup: make clear which parts are only needed if building from source
- [x] Workaround 1 for GnuTLS: perhaps mention how to remove Guix build farm's key
- [x] Overall (after everything): Make the links work.
Note to self: wherever possible, tell user how to check that something is true rather than branching by installation option.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fac4814106c796b8786dd90053513cc35142dfe5 - going to go ahead and merge this now. It's a lot of documentation, and could probably be nit-picked / improved further, however, that can continue over the next few weeks. I'm sure more (backportable) improvements / clarifications will be made while we progress through RCs towards a new release.
Tree-SHA512: dc46c0ecdfc67c7c7743ca26e4a603eb3f54adbf81be2f4c1f4c20577ebb84b5250b9c9ec89c0e9860337ab1c7cff94d7963c603287267deecfe1cd987fa070a
|
|
|
|
|
|
That way we can easily combine the document and detached signature to
produce cleartext signature files for upload during the release process.
See subsequent commits which modify doc/release-process.md for more
details.
|
|
- Added detailed Guix bootstrap/installation instructions
|
|
1edddf5de41b053049ce0b0bdbc39c2fbb743c40 Avoid GCC 7.1 ABI change warning in guix build (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
The arm-linux-gnueabihf guix build output is littered with warnings like:
```
/gnu/store/7a96hdqdb2qi8a39f09n84xjy2hr23rs-gcc-cross-arm-linux-gnueabihf-8.4.0/include/c++/bits/stl_vector.h:1085:4: note:
parameter passing for argument of type '__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<CRecipient*, std::vector<CRecipient> >' changed in GCC 7.1
```
These are irrelevant for us. Disable them using `-Wno-psabi`.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 1edddf5de41b053049ce0b0bdbc39c2fbb743c40
hebasto:
ACK 1edddf5de41b053049ce0b0bdbc39c2fbb743c40, after thorough reading related materials, I agree this change can be merged. As I mentioned above, I have been compiling my arm-32bit binaries with `-Wno-psabi` flag for two years, and no related flaws were observed.
Tree-SHA512: 485c7500547ac5da567ad23847341c18ff832607f5a1002676404cc647e437cf3445b6894ecff5b52929ca52bea946c06bd90eace1997c895e56204e787065e4
|
|
The chosen commit is the HEAD of Guix's version-1.3.0 branch as of July
15th, 2021.
Also fix visual indenting.
|
|
- Use 4.19 for riscv64 (earliest LTS release w/ riscv64 support)
- Use 4.9 for all others (second-oldest LTS release, released in
combination with glibc glibc 2.24 in Debian stretch)
|
|
|
|
On bare systems, it is possible to be lacking a services database. Check
for basic entries before attempting a build.
See the error message in the diff for more context.
|
|
|
|
We use these flags in our test-security-check make target, but they are
only available because debian patches them in.
We can patch them in for our Guix builds so that we can check the sanity
of our security/symbol checking suite before running them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that our Guix builds are performed on glibc 2.24 and 2.27 (RISCV),
we no-longer need to pass the --enable-glibc-back-compat option.
Replace it with --disable-threadlocal, to prevent the usage of symbols
from glibc 2.18.
None of the binaries produced required symbols later than 2.17, and 2.27
(RISCV).
|
|
|
|
Our 'bitcoin-linux-g++' definition better integrates with our depends
system than the stock linux-g++-64 definition.
This fixes a bug whereby Guix builds on x86_64 for x86_64 did not
produce a QMinimalIntegrationPlugin and led to bitcoin-qt not being
built.
|
|
Support for riscv64 in glibc landed in 2.27 so it's unavoidable that we
use 2.27.
Running a Bitcoin build with toolchains based on 2.24 for platforms
other than riscv64 seem to produce binaries which do not have 2.17
symbols. So use 2.24 since it's more recent and maintained by Debian
Stretch.
|
|
versions
aa80b5759dfa613780a99801641519dd78bb3eca scripts: check macOS SDK version is set (fanquake)
c972345bacd0cb01371b3f00941e81dce16278e1 scripts: check minimum required Windows version is set (fanquake)
29615aef52d7f1a29a87a29dfe4d39bf0e9867f3 scripts: check minimum required macOS vesion is set (fanquake)
8732f7b6c92f9dcf37f3ab618e9daab0c52fc781 scripts: LIEF 0.11.5 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
macOS:
We use a compile flag ([-mmacosx-version-min=10.14](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/depends/hosts/darwin.mk#L96)) to set the minimum required version of macOS needed to run our binaries. This adds a sanity check that the version is being set as expected.
Clangs Darwin driver should infer the SDK version used during compilation, and forward that through to the linker. Add a check that this has been done, and the expected SDK version is set. Should help prevent issues like #21771 in future.
Windows:
We use linker flags ([-Wl,--major/minor-subsystem-version](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/configure.ac#L683)) to set the minimum required version of Windows needed to run our binaries. This adds a sanity check that the version is being set as expected.
Gitian builds:
```bash
# macOS:
8b6fcd61d75001c37b2af3fceb5ae09f5d2fe85e97d361f684214bd91c27954a bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-osx-unsigned.dmg
3c1e412bc7f5a7a5d0f78e2cd84b7096831414e1304c1307211aa3e135d89bbf bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-osx-unsigned.tar.gz
50b7b2804e8481f63c69c78e3e8a71c0d811bf2db8895dd6d3edae9c46a738ae bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-osx64.tar.gz
fe6b5c0a550096b76b6727efee30e85b60163a41c83f21868c849fdd9876b675 src/bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9.tar.gz
8a20f21b20673dfc8c23e22b20ae0839bcaf65bf0e02f62381cdf5e7922936f0 bitcoin-core-osx-22-res.yml
# Windows:
b01fcdc2a5673387050d6c6c4f96f1d350976a121155fde3f76c2af309111f9d bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-win-unsigned.tar.gz
b95bdcbef638804030671d2332d58011f8c4ed4c1db87d6ffd211515c32c9d02 bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-win64-debug.zip
350bf180252d24a3d40f05e22398fec7bb00e06d812204eb5a421100a8e10638 bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
2730ddabe246d99913c9a779e97edcadb2d55309933d46f1dffd0d23ecf9aae5 bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-win64.zip
fe6b5c0a550096b76b6727efee30e85b60163a41c83f21868c849fdd9876b675 src/bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9.tar.gz
aa60d7a753e8cb2d4323cfbbf4d964ad3645e74c918cccd66862888f8646d80f bitcoin-core-win-22-res.yml
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK aa80b5759dfa613780a99801641519dd78bb3eca, tested by breaking tests:
Tree-SHA512: 10150219910e8131715fbfe20edaa15778387616ef3bfe1a5152c7acd3958fe8f88c74961c3d3641074eb72824680c22764bb1dc01a19e92e946c2d4962a8d2c
|
|
and hierarchy
e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong)
4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong)
28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Based on: #22075
Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff
The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me:
1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents
2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting
3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var)
4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server.
For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work:
1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest`
2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine
3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files:
```bash
for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do
gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,}
done
```
5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs`
-----
After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build:
```
output
└── x86_64-w64-mingw32
├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip
├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip
├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz
└── SHA256SUMS.part
```
These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like:
```
3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz
def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip
643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz
fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip
```
Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level
When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create:
1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and
3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs
Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy:
```
4e069f7589da/
└── dongcarl
├── all.SHA256SUMS
├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc
├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS
└── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226
hebasto:
ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only.
Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
|
|
|
|
683d197970a533690ca1bd4d06d021900e87cb8b Use latest signapple commit (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Update gitian and guix to use the same latest signapple commit.
Also changed guix to use the actual repo. The changes from the fork were incorporated upstream.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 683d197970a533690ca1bd4d06d021900e87cb8b - sanity checked that the updated package is built:
Tree-SHA512: a4981f8bbe33e6c5654632bc9b9f6f2f1e675741a19ac7296205e370f1e64a747101ecb632e0cc82a0134e4c2e9ce47b3f7b4d8c8f75f0f06dd069c078303759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108a6be92adc1e80839d90b552e72b8142140f6c guix: Check for disk space availability before building (Carl Dong)
d7dec89091ee4a456ff64ad7ce675ae6813668f1 guix: Remove dest if OUTDIR mv fails (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
There seems to be some corner cases that can be hit when guix scripts unexpectedly fail in the middle of operation, see: https://gnusha.org/bitcoin-builds/2021-05-24.log
- Perform an early disk space check for `guix-build`
- Overwrite existing output directory after a successful build (the existing one might be malformed), and cleanup output directory if the `mv` somehow fails
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Tested ACK 108a6be92adc1e80839d90b552e72b8142140f6c
achow101:
ACK 108a6be92adc1e80839d90b552e72b8142140f6c
Tree-SHA512: cf6438317da40bf55714cd2d8cce859b3d435cc66cabefe8d4a53552d7880966acfe84ffe8fadf1c80e368ae6b037992258a6d409df85ffc6ce8bf780e98e2e5
|
|
Update gitian and guix to use the same latest signapple commit
|
|
a58868d201cb6d263aa552815f7f86562c1ca9a5 build: Makes rcc output always deterministic (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The Qt Resource Compiler ([rcc](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/rcc.html)) has a command-line option `--format-version` which has the [default value](https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/tools/rcc/main.cpp?h=5.12.10#n172) 2.
The only difference from `--format-version 1` is adding a [last modified timestamp](https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/tools/rcc/rcc.cpp?h=5.12.10#n207) to the output file ([credits](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21654#issuecomment-819198228) to **fanquake**). That, in turn, forces us to use `QT_RCC_SOURCE_DATE_OVERRIDE=1` to get deterministic builds (#13732).
This change makes rcc output always deterministic by using `--format-version 1` option that makes usage of the
`QT_RCC_SOURCE_DATE_OVERRIDE` needless.
---
Also it improves interaction with ccache:
On master (f6c44e999b7d1d9a0de5d678ac8f1679aa271f65):
```
$ make && make clean && ccache --zero-stats && make && ccache --show-stats
...
cache directory /home/hebasto/.ccache
primary config /home/hebasto/.ccache/ccache.conf
secondary config (readonly) /etc/ccache.conf
stats updated Sun Apr 11 15:45:43 2021
stats zeroed Sun Apr 11 15:45:05 2021
cache hit (direct) 638
cache hit (preprocessed) 0
cache miss 1
cache hit rate 99.84 %
called for link 10
cleanups performed 0
files in cache 20023
cache size 13.2 GB
max cache size 15.0 GB
```
The missed file is always `qt/libbitcoinqt_a-qrc_bitcoin_locale.o`.
With this PR:
```
$ make && make clean && ccache --zero-stats && make && ccache --show-stats
...
cache directory /home/hebasto/.ccache
primary config /home/hebasto/.ccache/ccache.conf
secondary config (readonly) /etc/ccache.conf
stats updated Sun Apr 11 15:28:46 2021
stats zeroed Sun Apr 11 15:28:21 2021
cache hit (direct) 639
cache hit (preprocessed) 0
cache miss 0
cache hit rate 100.00 %
called for link 10
cleanups performed 0
files in cache 20012
cache size 13.2 GB
max cache size 15.0 GB
```
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK a58868d201cb6d263aa552815f7f86562c1ca9a5
Tree-SHA512: 52f4a3267f41883d13025c0de79b6da22e92d60c729e01b986935c6812bbfe7fadc40b742bd715bfdf09df94af6838d4fbbe8208c6123f366108e38c8e1121c5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise the resulting .a static libraries (e.g. libstdc++.a) will not
be reproducible and end up making the Bitcoin binaries non-reproducible
as well.
See: https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/archives/#gnu-libtool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
