aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-09-07Merge #15450: gui: Create wallet menu optionfanquake
613de61a04c210a51af9997e69f66439a17a632a Add Create Wallet menu action (Andrew Chow) 9b41cbb28f603f4f71f5854d6ae2527932bba3cb Expose wallet creation to the GUI via WalletController (Andrew Chow) 78863e290006e61060622dbdbecc5b58c0fefa05 Add CreateWalletDialog to create wallets from the GUI (Andrew Chow) 60adb21c7affb41ec475a62a53fb0a36bea35dfb Optionally allow AskPassphraseDialog to output the passphrase (Andrew Chow) bc6d8a3662f0fb992073e5e80269a90a722d76e0 gui: Refactor OpenWalletActivity (João Barbosa) Pull request description: This PR adds a menu option to create a new wallet. When clicked, a `CreateWalletDialog` will be created and prompt the user to name the wallet and choose whether to disable private keys, make a blank wallet, and encrypt the wallet. If the wallet is encrypted, the wallet will be born encrypted with the wallet first created blank, then encrypted, and then a new HD seed generated and set. To allow the newly created wallets to be encrypted, some changes to how encrypting a wallet works. Instead of encrypting and locking the wallet, the wallet will be encrypted and then unlocked. This is also an extra belt-and-suspenders check to make sure that encryption worked. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 613de61a04c210a51af9997e69f66439a17a632a - re-reviewed on macOS. I'm going to merge this now. It's had a stack of review, and as mentioned multiple times above, lets get this into `master` so it can get more testing pre `v0.19.0`. Tree-SHA512: 3f22cc20b13703ffc90d366ae9133114832fea77f4f319da7fd85eb454f2f0bd5d7e1e6e20284dea2f370d8574f83b45669dcbbe506b994410d32e8e7a6fa877
2019-09-07Merge #16810: guix: Remove ssp spec file hackfanquake
0065ead5ebdad9f743d89ee2558c93253a597967 contrib: guix: Remove ssp spec file hack (Carl Dong) 0093a5869a30797ccb139d0cb5a0427d3f3c2d94 contrib: guix: More robust search paths, add checks (Carl Dong) Pull request description: See commit messages for more details ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 0065ead5ebdad9f743d89ee2558c93253a597967 Tree-SHA512: fde04005fb31cd4b75b80da4936a7c394f63f0b3bdcc33c20c99e05604a63efd9c850a8d097030ff0bf4b4e83f1a9997fc4621ce291ebcecd8397893447600a7
2019-09-07Merge #16421: Conservatively accept RBF bumps bumping one tx at the package ↵fanquake
limits 5ce822efbe45513ce3517c1ca731ac6d6a0c3b54 Conservatively accept RBF bumps bumping one tx at the package limits (Matt Corallo) Pull request description: Based on #15681, this adds support for some simple cases of RBF inside of large packages. Issue pointed out by sdaftuar in #15681, and this fix (or a broader one) is required ot make #15681 fully useful. Accept RBF bumps of single transactions (ie which evict exactly one transaction) even when that transaction is a member of a package which is currently at the package limit iff the new transaction does not add any additional mempool dependencies from the original. This could be made a bit looser in the future and still be safe, but for now this fixes the case that a transaction which was accepted by the carve-out rule will not be directly RBF'able ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: re-ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16421/commits/5ce822efbe45513ce3517c1ca731ac6d6a0c3b54 ajtowns: ACK 5ce822efbe45513ce3517c1ca731ac6d6a0c3b54 ; GetSizeWithDescendants is only change and makes sense sipa: Code review ACK 5ce822efbe45513ce3517c1ca731ac6d6a0c3b54. I haven't thought hard about the effect on potential DoS issues this policy change may have. Tree-SHA512: 1cee3bc57393940a30206679eb60c3ec8cb4f4825d27d40d1f062c86bd22542dd5944fa5567601c74c8d9fd425333ed3e686195170925cfc68777e861844bd55
2019-09-07Merge #16798: Refactor rawtransaction_util's SignTransaction to separate ↵fanquake
prevtx parsing 39034f1ee628dae0bc9da5b1b30b8a424e66d968 Refactor rawtransaction_util's SignTransaction to have previous tx parsing be separate (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: Currently the `SignTransaction` function has to handle both the actual signing and parsing of previous transaction data. This PR splits it so that `SignTransaction` only handles the signing itself and adds a `ParsePrevouts` function which handles parsing the prevtx information. This allows for `SignTransaction` to just take any `SigningProvider`. Split from #16341 ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK 39034f1ee628dae0bc9da5b1b30b8a424e66d968 instagibbs: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16798/commits/39034f1ee628dae0bc9da5b1b30b8a424e66d968 ryanofsky: utACK 39034f1ee628dae0bc9da5b1b30b8a424e66d968. No change since previously reviewed b49bbb939be92a67ff77c3f7bca5bb94dd141906, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16341#pullrequestreview-278610269 other than rebase with no conflicts. Tree-SHA512: 09f7733e90691766bfb5cf0f20e913dbf270bd3b51abdcad966b24d110e562ed85fd3d0d1d7bbea61f903340060052ec73c4817b09aee0dc1f3916d781a9e40c
2019-09-06Merge #16793: refactor: Avoid locking cs_main in ProcessNewBlockHeadersMarcoFalke
3109a1f948f3c8fd500defbdc4e59bfb2953c30b refactor: Avoid locking cs_main in ProcessNewBlockHeaders (João Barbosa) Pull request description: Builds on #16774, this change avoids locking `cs_main` in `ProcessNewBlockHeaders` when the tip has changed - in this case the removed lock was necessary to just log a message. Top commit has no ACKs. Tree-SHA512: 31be6d319fa122804f72fa813cec5ed041dd7e4aef3c1921124a1f03016925c43cd4d9a272d80093e77fa7600e3506ef47b7bb821afcbffe01e6be9bceb6dc00
2019-09-05Add Create Wallet menu actionAndrew Chow
Co-authored-by: João Barbosa <joao.paulo.barbosa@gmail.com>
2019-09-05Expose wallet creation to the GUI via WalletControllerAndrew Chow
Co-authored-by: João Barbosa <joao.paulo.barbosa@gmail.com>
2019-09-05Add CreateWalletDialog to create wallets from the GUIAndrew Chow
Co-authored-by: João Barbosa <joao.paulo.barbosa@gmail.com>
2019-09-05Optionally allow AskPassphraseDialog to output the passphraseAndrew Chow
2019-09-06refactor: Avoid locking cs_main in ProcessNewBlockHeadersJoão Barbosa
2019-09-06gui: Refactor OpenWalletActivityJoão Barbosa
2019-09-05contrib: guix: Remove ssp spec file hackCarl Dong
This hack is no longer needed after fixing our cross-compilation search paths.
2019-09-05contrib: guix: More robust search paths, add checksCarl Dong
- store_path() previously only worked for cross compilation packages, we remove this assumption here - Add CROSS_GCC_LIB variable which points to where gcc libs/headers are located - Add gcc libs/headers to our CROSS_*_PATH environment variables - Check that all directories in CROSS_*_PATH are sane
2019-09-06Merge #16624: wallet: encapsulate transactions stateMeshCollider
442a87cc0ae43ebc9b6654a6165778eecb931f74 Add a test wallet_reorgsrestore (Antoine Riard) 40ede992d97df38282919693dfe851c975c3b1d8 Modify wallet tx status if has been reorged out (Antoine Riard) 7e89994133725125dddbfa8d45484e3b9ed51c6e Remove SyncTransaction for conflicted txn in CWallet::BlockConnected (Antoine Riard) a31be09bfd77eed497a8e251d31358e16e2f2eb1 Encapsulate tx status in a Confirmation struct (Antoine Riard) Pull request description: While working on #15931, I've tried to rationalize tx state management to ease integration of block height tracking per-wallet tx. We currently rely on a combination of `hashBlock` and `nIndex` with magic value to determine tx confirmation, conflicted or abandoned state. It's hard to reason and error-prone. To solve that, we encapsulate these fields in a `TxConfirmation` struct and introduce a `TxState` member that we update accordingly at block connection/disconnection. Following jnewbery [recommendation](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15931#discussion_r312576506), I've taken these changes in its own commit, and open a PR to get them first. It would ease review of aforementioned PR, but above all should ease fixing of long-term issues like : * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7315 (but maybe we should abandon abandontransaction or relieve it to only free outpoints not track the transaction as abandoned in itself, need its own discussion) * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8692 where we should cancel conflicted state of transactions chain smoothly * `MarkConflicted` in `LoadToWallet` is likely useless if we track conflicts rights at block connection Main changes of this PR to get right are tx update in `AddToWallet` and serialization/deserialization logic. ACKs for top commit: meshcollider: Light re-Code Review ACK 442a87cc0ae43ebc9b6654a6165778eecb931f74 ryanofsky: utACK 442a87cc0ae43ebc9b6654a6165778eecb931f74. Changes since last review are switching from `hasChain` to `LockChain` and removing chain lock in `WalletBatch::LoadWallet` that's redundant with the new lock still added in `CWallet::LoadWallet`, and fixing python test race condition. Tree-SHA512: 029209e006de0240436817204e69e548c5665e2b0721b214510e7aba7eba130a5eab441d3a1ad95bd6426114dd27390492c77bf4560a9610009b32cd0a1f72f7
2019-09-05Merge #16792: Assert that the HRP is lowercase in Bech32::EncodeWladimir J. van der Laan
2457aea83c1f9fba708e2335bb197950bf0b6244 Assert that the HRP is lowercase in Bech32::Encode (Samuel Dobson) Pull request description: From BIP-173: > The lowercase form is used when determining a character's value for checksum purposes. > Encoders MUST always output an all lowercase Bech32 string. If an uppercase version of the encoding result is desired, (e.g.- for presentation purposes, or QR code use), then an uppercasing procedure can be performed external to the encoding process. Currently if HRP contains uppercase characters, the checksum will be generated over these uppercase characters resulting in mixed-case output that will always be invalid even if the case is changed manually after encoding. This shouldn't happen because both prefix's `bc` and `tb` are lowercase currently, but we assert this condition anyway. This is consistent also with the [C reference implementation](https://github.com/sipa/bech32/blob/2b0aac650ce560fb2b2a2bebeacaa5c87d7e5938/ref/c/segwit_addr.c#L59) ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK 2457aea83c1f9fba708e2335bb197950bf0b6244 Tree-SHA512: 24fcbbc2f315c72c550cc3d82b4332443eea6378fc73d571f98b87492604d023378dd102377c9e05467192cae6049606dee98e4c5688c8d5e4caac50c970284b
2019-09-05Merge #16804: test: Remove unused try-block in assert_debug_logWladimir J. van der Laan
fae91a09c453a9a95c382df765bd71e54698d5b2 test: Remove incorrect and unused try-block in assert_debug_log (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This try block has accidentally been added by me in fa3e9f7627784ee00980590e5bf044a0e1249999. It was unused all the time, but commit 6011c9d72d1df5c2cd09de6f85c21eb4f7eb1ba8 added a `return` in the finally block, muting all exceptions. This can be tested by adding an `assert False` after any `with ...assert_debug_log...:` line. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK fae91a09c453a9a95c382df765bd71e54698d5b2 ryanofsky: utACK fae91a09c453a9a95c382df765bd71e54698d5b2. I didn't know returning inside a `finally` block would cancel pending exceptions or return values, but I guess this makes sense and is a good thing to be aware of. Tree-SHA512: 47ed0165062060e9af055a3e92f1a529cd41d00476bfad64e3cd141ae084d22f926a343bb1257717e164e15459a59ab66aed198c95d18bf780d8cb0b76aa3298
2019-09-05Assert that the HRP is lowercase in Bech32::EncodeSamuel Dobson
2019-09-05Merge #15257: Scripts and tools: Bump flake8 to 3.7.8MarcoFalke
3d0a82cff8cbb809876e82dbe62d14d2adc07d94 devtools: Accomodate block-style copyright blocks (Ben Woosley) 0ef0e51fe4bb592e67255776b5a0ba04679fb8c4 lint: Bump flake8 to 3.7.8 (Ben Woosley) 838920704ad90a71cf288b700052503db8abb17e lint: Disable flake8 W504 warning (Ben Woosley) b21680baf5391a602b295b9d7d0ef66553661cb9 test/contrib: Fix invalid escapes in regex strings (Ben Woosley) Pull request description: This is a second go at #15221, fixing new lints in: W504 line break after binary operator W605 invalid escape sequence F841 local variable 'e' is assigned to but never used This time around: * One commit per rule, for easier review * I went with the PEP-8 style of breaking before binary operators * I looked into the raw regex newline issue, and found that raw strings with newlines embedded do work appropriately. E.g. run `re.match(r" \n ", " \n ")` to check this for yourself. `re.MULTILINE` exists to modify `^` and `$` in multiline scenarios, but all of these searches are per-line. ACKs for top commit: practicalswift: ACK 3d0a82cff8cbb809876e82dbe62d14d2adc07d94 -- diff looks correct Tree-SHA512: bea0c144cadd72e4adf2e9a4b4ee0535dd91a8e694206924cf8a389dc9253f364a717edfe9abda88108fbb67fda19b9e823f46822d7303c0aaa72e48909a6105
2019-09-05Merge #16768: test: Make lint-includes.sh work from any directoryMarcoFalke
490da639cbd48ce0dc438abbfc89ab796391cb2a Make lint-includes.sh work from any directory (Kristaps Kaupe) Pull request description: Before this change it works from root folder of bitcoin git repo, but if you do `cd test/lint; ./test-includes.sh`, you will have a lot of false positive messages like this: ``` Good job! The circular dependency "chainparamsbase -> util/system -> chainparamsbase" is no longer present. Please remove it from EXPECTED_CIRCULAR_DEPENDENCIES in ./lint-circular-dependencies.sh to make sure this circular dependency is not accidentally reintroduced. Good job! The circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is no longer present. Please remove it from EXPECTED_CIRCULAR_DEPENDENCIES in ./lint-circular-dependencies.sh to make sure this circular dependency is not accidentally reintroduced. ``` Top commit has no ACKs. Tree-SHA512: 07fa69cb2883181dcee922191acac4b242722eeb2916cdffdc7163421302b22f3c9525aaf4c754a9dba1c307032c05285e38191d5c6aabc894321f8a27bbceaa
2019-09-04Conservatively accept RBF bumps bumping one tx at the package limitsMatt Corallo
Accept RBF bumps of single transactions (ie which conflict with one transaction) even when that transaction is a member of a package which is currently at the package limit iff the new transaction does not add any additional mempool dependencies from the original. This could be made a bit looser in the future and still be safe, but for now this fixes the case that a transaction which was accepted by the carve-out rule will not be directly RBF'able.
2019-09-04Make lint-includes.sh work from any directoryKristaps Kaupe
2019-09-04test: Remove incorrect and unused try-block in assert_debug_logMarcoFalke
2019-09-03Merge #16774: Avoid unnecessary "Synchronizing blockheaders" log messagesMarcoFalke
dcc448e3d2b97f7e4e23f5ed174762cec3530306 Avoid unnecessary "Synchronizing blockheaders" log messages (Jonas Schnelli) Pull request description: Fixes #16773 I'm not entirely sure why 16773 happend, but probably due to headers fallback in a compact block. However, this PR should fix it and should have been included in #15615. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK dcc448e3d2b97f7e4e23f5ed174762cec3530306 ; code review only, haven't compiled or tested. promag: ACK dcc448e3d2b97f7e4e23f5ed174762cec3530306. TheBlueMatt: utACK dcc448e3d2b97f7e4e23f5ed174762cec3530306. Went and read how pindexBestHeader is handled and this code looks correct (worst case it breaks a LogPrint, so whatever). I also ran into this on #16762. fanquake: ACK dcc448e3d2b97f7e4e23f5ed174762cec3530306 Tree-SHA512: f8cac3b6eb9d4e8fab53a535b55f9ea9b058e3ab6ade64801ebc56439ede4f54b5fee36d5d2b316966ab987b65b13ab9dc18849f345d08b81ecdf2722a3f5f5a
2019-09-03Refactor rawtransaction_util's SignTransaction to have previous tx parsing ↵Andrew Chow
be separate
2019-09-03devtools: Accomodate block-style copyright blocksBen Woosley
Without this, `copyright_header.py report . verbose` reports: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 with unexpected copyright holder names ./build_msvc/libsecp256k1_config.h -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019-09-03lint: Bump flake8 to 3.7.8Ben Woosley
2019-09-03lint: Disable flake8 W504 warningBen Woosley
In the words of MarcoFalke: "W504 should be disabled. This is not a critical error that should be blocking a merge" https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15257#discussion_r302017280
2019-09-03test/contrib: Fix invalid escapes in regex stringsBen Woosley
Flagged by flake8 v3.6.0, as W605, plus a few others identified incidentally, e.g. 59ffecf66cf4d08c4b431e457b083878d66a3fd6. Note that r"\n" matches to "\n" under re.match/search.
2019-09-03Merge #16745: wallet: Translate all initErrors in CreateWalletFromFileWladimir J. van der Laan
fa61365a1368f9970fa22fb96f89f4ecc08e69f0 wallet: Translate all initErrors in CreateWalletFromFile (MarcoFalke) fa70d199d0c2182d76b2a1cfa21f9ada4bb12913 util: Make util/error bilingual_str (refactor) (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: The translations are going to close in three days (#15940), so I am submitting this as a standalone pull request. Those changes are part of a bugfix #16661, which includes a test. The first change (the refactor) is required, the second commit is not. I am happy to drop it, if needed. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: utACK fa61365a1368f9970fa22fb96f89f4ecc08e69f0 hebasto: ACK fa61365a1368f9970fa22fb96f89f4ecc08e69f0, I have tested the code on Linux Mint 19.2. Tree-SHA512: a7616cc38b9ffd301c6b915ea808a65815c3d97e9f57ec091772eb260e5cf0d75a13a6e4dfa3913e236833677c7929b9a748cb7d7a0e406d51749944b614e11b
2019-09-03Merge #16788: gui: Update transifex slug for 0.19Wladimir J. van der Laan
057fac345307a70a503ae47ac478ae49a7208fe6 gui: Update English source translation (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 072f37a7ed1141a1f41eca22ac283834d2c3f6da gui: Update transifex slug for 0.19 (Wladimir J. van der Laan) Pull request description: - Update transifex slug for 0.19 - Update English source translation ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 057fac345307a70a503ae47ac478ae49a7208fe6 - I see the same diff when running `make translate`. Tree-SHA512: e6800011c2cc642b656d2a8fa652e94c665183424321eb4f1f3506e90a65f730794e5e9d49243538c0710c66fec1ed6f30e099dbc8a847e840817e894782866f
2019-09-02gui: Update English source translationWladimir J. van der Laan
2019-09-02gui: Update transifex slug for 0.19Wladimir J. van der Laan
2019-09-02Merge #16185: gettransaction: add an argument to decode the transactionMeshCollider
9965940e35c445ccded55510348af228ff22f0e9 doc: Add release note for the new gettransaction argument (darosior) b8b3f0435a2837d3897e9e232ef6ca839ce74eb8 tests: Add a new functional test for gettransaction (darosior) 7f3bb247a811582d1aa4805d8e601c19808dc7ba gettransaction: add an argument to decode the transaction (darosior) Pull request description: This PR adds a new parameter to the `gettransaction` call : `decode`. If set to `true`, it will add a new `decoded` field to the response. This mimics the behavior of `getrawtransaction`'s `verbose` argument to avoid using 2 calls if we want to decode a wallet transaction (`gettransaction` then `decoderawtransaction`). Fix #16181 . ACKs for top commit: meshcollider: re-utACK 9965940e35c445ccded55510348af228ff22f0e9 Tree-SHA512: bcb6b4bd252b3488d6afc77659c499c2ad99fd58661eb24b6a2e17014c74f22e47fde70e00fedb4f4754915786622ad02483b2cf2c4dea0ab0eb4ac8276dbeee
2019-09-02Merge #13868: Remove unused fScriptChecks parameter from CheckInputsfanquake
9b92538adebd30353ffc1a427bc20ab0c3fc75f1 Remove unused fScriptChecks parameter from CheckInputs (Matt Corallo) Pull request description: fScriptChecks = false just short-circuits the entire function, so passing it in is entirely useless. This is extracted from #13233 /cc TheBlueMatt. Recommend reviewing with `git show --ignore-all-space`, i.e.: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13868/files?w=1 ACKs for top commit: TheBlueMatt: utACK 9b92538adebd30353ffc1a427bc20ab0c3fc75f1. Checked diff had no functional change and new comment copy looks correct. kallewoof: ACK 9b92538adebd30353ffc1a427bc20ab0c3fc75f1 ajtowns: ACK 9b92538adebd30353ffc1a427bc20ab0c3fc75f1 ; code review, checked tests work. Looks right to me, and fanquake's notes make sense. Could change the coinbase early exit to `assert(!tx.IsCoinBase());`. fanquake: ACK 9b92538adebd30353ffc1a427bc20ab0c3fc75f1 - Notes / testing below. Tree-SHA512: add253a3e8cf4b33eddbc49efcec333c14b5ea61c7d34e43230351d40cff6adc919a75b91c72c4de8647a395284db74a61639f4c67848d4b2fec3a705b557790
2019-09-01Merge #16720: qt: Replace objc_msgSend() function calls with the native ↵fanquake
Objective-C syntax 0bb33b5348dbddd65b88a7f00449c965562355d3 qt: Replace objc_msgSend with native syntax (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: Changes in Xcode 11 Objective-C Runtime cause an error (#16387) during building on MacOS 10.15 Catalina. This PR fixes this issue by replacing `objc_msgSend()` function calls with the native Objective-C syntax. Refs: - [changes in `objc_msgSend` function](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/objectivec/1456712-objc_msgsend?changes=latest_minor&language=objc) - [`OBJC_OLD_DISPATCH_PROTOTYPES` macro](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/objectivec/objc_old_dispatch_prototypes?language=objc) ACKs for top commit: l2a5b1: ACK 0bb33b5 - Diff looks good. Sending messages via native Objective-C code feels more robust and is more readable than casting all the `objc_msgSend` function calls to the appropriate function signature (which would also have fixed the issue). jonasschnelli: utACK 0bb33b5348dbddd65b88a7f00449c965562355d3 - Confirmed that the called macOS framework function is available on our build targets. fanquake: ACK 0bb33b5348dbddd65b88a7f00449c965562355d3 - Still works as expected. Tree-SHA512: c09cb684d06bd1da053a17c182b7bb1642e45bb347d26c76e1c5d835c320567caee366d85e34bb7f2be38e63ed041e0d06a56c2a9d89f7e5bece9b19cc5c6772
2019-08-31Avoid unnecessary "Synchronizing blockheaders" log messagesJonas Schnelli
2019-08-31qt: Replace objc_msgSend with native syntaxHennadii Stepanov
2019-08-31Merge #16767: test: Check for codespell in lint-spelling.shfanquake
8340763dc3278c828ee7d525de4c71b4615d17cc Check for codespell in lint-spelling.sh (Kristaps Kaupe) Pull request description: Similar check for `spellcheck` already exists in `lint-shell.sh` ACKs for top commit: practicalswift: ACK 8340763dc3278c828ee7d525de4c71b4615d17cc -- diff looks correct fanquake: ACK 8340763dc3278c828ee7d525de4c71b4615d17cc - Test is the same as in `lint-shell.sh`. Tree-SHA512: f590fc4eae391c5246e86cb70cf79431bd3763ac872f82d3b2222c3a095235ca046a7072c5e61bbaeb3ed6ecd5ff85979769ee8b585de4fb97ac8cfbbf73b956
2019-08-31Merge #16716: wallet: Use wallet name instead of pointer on unload/releasefanquake
d9d8984270dbb004ec94f8dbb289be2bc9e4dbc3 wallet: Use wallet name instead of pointer on unload/release (João Barbosa) Pull request description: Fixes #16668. Wallet name is unique so it can be used instead of pointer. ACKs for top commit: meshcollider: utACK d9d8984270dbb004ec94f8dbb289be2bc9e4dbc3 instagibbs: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16716/commits/d9d8984270dbb004ec94f8dbb289be2bc9e4dbc3 ryanofsky: utACK d9d8984270dbb004ec94f8dbb289be2bc9e4dbc3. Alternately I think it might be possible to use an intptr_t set instead of a string set to get around the undefined behavior described in the issue. Tree-SHA512: eccd4d260cd4c02b52c30deeb32dbfd190a1151a5340eb3aa4ece0dc6ae3b3ed746ce5617336461f6f27c437c435629cd07d20beb1c5450f23b75edde6728598
2019-08-31Merge #16760: qt: Change uninstall icon on Windowsfanquake
635e9154da223ca760713d7b3b66c0a9321d1277 [qt] Change uninstall icon on Windows (GChuf) Pull request description: Change uninstall icon in Windows by changing a registry value. Original uninstall.exe icon remains the same Reason: almost no other modern program uses that uninstall icon in Windows. before: ![before](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42591821/63967490-13a09000-ca8d-11e9-8f49-3884d33302ce.png) after: ![after](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42591821/63967491-13a09000-ca8d-11e9-82f0-5adb74246a1e.png) ACKs for top commit: promag: ACK 635e9154da223ca760713d7b3b66c0a9321d1277. l2a5b1: ACK 635e915 practicalswift: ACK 635e9154da223ca760713d7b3b66c0a9321d1277 jonasschnelli: utACK 635e9154da223ca760713d7b3b66c0a9321d1277 fanquake: ACK 635e9154da223ca760713d7b3b66c0a9321d1277 - Tested building and installing using WSL on Windows 10. Tree-SHA512: a0f435c79e726896cc93db058f1712dcf37daefbcacbf213b340ef2d5f4ff387148b8d659302f3e84be8a9f3df23e72b0ca5937f5d77499b808081bd40bfbbac
2019-08-31Check for codespell in lint-spelling.shKristaps Kaupe
Similar check for spellcheck already exists in lint-shell.sh
2019-08-30doc: Add release note for the new gettransaction argumentdarosior
2019-08-30tests: Add a new functional test for gettransactiondarosior
2019-08-30gettransaction: add an argument to decode the transactiondarosior
This adds a new boolean parameter 'decode' to the gettransaction call, which, if set to true, add a 'decoded' field to the result containing the decoded transaction
2019-08-30Merge #16758: qt: Replace QFontMetrics::width() with TextWidth()fanquake
8b6f5aabb9b21bea875170ae0f49661a4e38dbd3 qt: Replace QFontMetrics::width() with TextWidth() (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: Compiling master (d8fc9979130a268cf55b12c223b20fd7d4b9f67f) on macOS Catalina (with a patch from #16720) reveals one more instance of `QFontMetrics::width()` which is supposed to be replaced with `TextWidth()` in the merged #16701. Sorry for incomplete solution provided in #16701. It’s especially sad that the line I missed lies in only 7 lines from the code touched in #16701. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK 8b6f5aabb9b21bea875170ae0f49661a4e38dbd3 Tree-SHA512: 65cd8bea550150e5ee47c1e906d8c2393547cf4feba3701a933a4f24fad5ecdb552ac2de4e1200ed14efaa0df0480150dd58fccbddc3b902f6c2141603874902
2019-08-30Merge #16753: wallet: extract PubKey from P2PK script with Solverfanquake
798a589aff64b83a0844688a661f4bd987c3340c wallet: extract PubKey from P2PK script with Solver (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: The function `ExtractPubKey()` checks if a given script matches the P2PK pattern (`<PubKey> OP_CHECKSIG`), extracts the PubKey and additionally checks if it is cryptographically valid (full validation with ECC library via `CPubKey::IsFullyValid()`). Currently this is done manually in the following order: 1. check if first script OP is data push with valid PubKey length (first part of pattern match), extract PubKey 2. create `CPubKey` object with extracted PubKey 3. fully validate public key 4. check if last script OP is `OP_CHECKSIG` (second part of pattern match) Using Solver, the pattern matching and PubKey extraction can be done via a single step, leading to the following simplified order with shorter code: 1. check if given script matches P2PK pattern with Solver (also contains valid PubKey length check), extracts Pubkey 2. create `CPubKey` object with extracted Pubkey 3. fully validate public key ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16753/commits/798a589aff64b83a0844688a661f4bd987c3340c theStack: > utACK [798a589](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/798a589aff64b83a0844688a661f4bd987c3340c) sipa: ACK 798a589aff64b83a0844688a661f4bd987c3340c achow101: Code Review ACK 798a589aff64b83a0844688a661f4bd987c3340c Tree-SHA512: 350358a89afed8c2a7967c50e9714a2d4a909259b50e694ce68dde3e7d0fa0bf3238d33642e73f2bdb53860f6d3f7327ca3eb6426b74eaffacfbca0a384d68cd
2019-08-30Merge #14862: doc: Declare BLOCK_VALID_HEADER reservedfanquake
fa0b910486e9aada077fe47e1201dcb3bd523c87 [doc] chain: Declare BLOCK_VALID_HEADER reserved (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: `BLOCK_VALID_HEADER` was never used and the comment is confusing to me in several ways: * It claims "version ok". However, without the previous header, it is not possible to check the validity of the version since the height needs to be known (c.f. BIP 90) * It claims "hash satisfies claimed PoW". While it is possible to check against the claimed PoW, it is not possible without the previous header to check that the claimed PoW is itself valid. * It claims "1 <= vtx count <= max". However, with the header alone and current consensus rules, the number of transactions is unknown. ACKs for top commit: sipa: ACK fa0b910486e9aada077fe47e1201dcb3bd523c87 ryanofsky: ACK fa0b910486e9aada077fe47e1201dcb3bd523c87 Tree-SHA512: 3972995a0a2f83aa55767bf8982af1fcb9493483f62aee6df27e58be9181a48d5968ae718b390cecc8be3ed4f26495683b1cffde8ef272dea0bd610ec169ef8b
2019-08-29[qt] Change uninstall icon on WindowsGChuf
2019-08-29Merge #16707: qt: Remove obsolete QModelIndex::child()Jonas Schnelli
c53667764ea65c0f8661358759b0124f808ce587 qt: Remove obsolete QModelIndex::child() (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: The `QModelIndex::child()` member function is [obsolete](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5.12/qmodelindex-obsolete.html) since Qt 5.12. This PR removes it, does not change behavior and keeps compatibility with [Qt 5.5.1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15393). Here is an excerpt from the master build log: ``` qt/receivecoinsdialog.cpp: In member function ‘void ReceiveCoinsDialog::copyColumnToClipboard(int)’: qt/receivecoinsdialog.cpp:264:111: warning: ‘QModelIndex QModelIndex::child(int, int) const’ is deprecated: Use QAbstractItemModel::index [-Wdeprecated-declarations] GUIUtil::setClipboard(model->getRecentRequestsTableModel()->data(firstIndex.child(firstIndex.row(), column), Qt::EditRole).toString()); ^ In file included from /home/hebasto/Qt/5.13.0/gcc_64/include/QtWidgets/qabstractitemview.h:45:0, from /home/hebasto/Qt/5.13.0/gcc_64/include/QtWidgets/qheaderview.h:44, from /home/hebasto/Qt/5.13.0/gcc_64/include/QtWidgets/QHeaderView:1, from ./qt/guiutil.h:12, from ./qt/receivecoinsdialog.h:8, from qt/receivecoinsdialog.cpp:7: /home/hebasto/Qt/5.13.0/gcc_64/include/QtCore/qabstractitemmodel.h:457:20: note: declared here inline QModelIndex QModelIndex::child(int arow, int acolumn) const ^~~~~~~~~~~ ``` ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK c53667764ea65c0f8661358759b0124f808ce587 promag: ACK c53667764ea65c0f8661358759b0124f808ce587, just read the change. jonasschnelli: utACK c53667764ea65c0f8661358759b0124f808ce587 Tree-SHA512: 99fcb6ff60a6d47b925bda9f14006269eaad09ba4f7a41ac4975c6cf04bd906b58aed721cbfa0be7da8e6613d92e30d4be18b7e4d3960f026c7226558a4c3196
2019-08-29qt: Replace QFontMetrics::width() with TextWidth()Hennadii Stepanov
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-11-05 11:02:35 +0000