Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
This test was previously run twice, once with `--legacy-wallet` and once with
`--descriptors`.
Now we run it only with `--legacy-wallet`, as all the tests has been
ported to the MiniWallet but `raw_multisig_transaction_legacy_tests`,
which can be run only with the legacy wallet.
We also decrease the number of nodes used from 4 to 3, making the test
run slightly faster.
|
|
Put signrawtransactionwithwallet_tests in rpc_signrawtransaction.py,
as the test is mainly testing the signrawtransaction RPC.
Review with `git show --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
|
|
74743ad90590708b46a8bc8cb9cefedb66471306 Clarify in release process how to update defaultAssumeValid/nMinimumChainWork (Jon Atack)
415345d5475854ae34056594ac0bc464d739d3af Release process: use 4096 blocks and getbestblockhash for getchaintxstats (Jon Atack)
fe048f7f7cd15597f24ca219a0077c46d088ca30 Specify in release process which chains need to be updated (Jon Atack)
584147682ad670cd3be99006af5d643549bba3bc Reorganize release process chainparams section to reduce repetition (Jon Atack)
e8f844888f3663d0cbb8765271d1ee5fea4af579 Clarify release process overhead note to be more actionable (Jon Atack)
e538eada7c559362f43051f18d38b3d3c3be2dc8 Release process: exclude huge files for mainnet m_assumed_blockchain_size (laanwj)
b4d2d74767ed0441dbc3a789cad2334eaac54290 Release process: specify blockchain/chain_state units, reduce repetition (Jon Atack)
318655c3951d69adfa0aaf9f7b5064172678494f Add missing references to signet in the release process (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Release process updates, fixes and clarifications regarding updating the chainparams:
- add missing references to signet
- specify specify blockchain/chainstate units, reduce repetition
- exclude huge files for m_assumed_blockchain_size on mainnet
- rewrite overhead note to be more actionable
- reorganize the chainparams section to reduce repetition
- specify which chains need to be updated
- use 4096 blocks and getbestblockhash for getchaintxstats
- clarify how to update defaultAssumeValid and nMinimumChainWork
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 74743ad90590708b46a8bc8cb9cefedb66471306
brunoerg:
re-ACK 74743ad90590708b46a8bc8cb9cefedb66471306
Tree-SHA512: 7fc092be739f63c5d8404add2dcbcd0c570b680ff0ab36a9b5a774b2e930717beebaa6c867ab6db6795b3c234d9016ab1ae905a78d6ea6610140a59930c43029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suggested-by: Vincenzo Palazzo
|
|
As stated on the website, duplicate keys make it hard to reason about
malleability as a single signature may unlock multiple paths.
We use a custom KeyCompare function instead of operator< to be explicit
about the requirement.
|
|
cc61bc2e19b1c8cb32778ef42746d32b02cc2671 compat: remove glibcxx sanity checks (fanquake)
Pull request description:
These checks were added in #4339, (see also #4081), to test
our back-compat stubs, however, those stubs no-longer exist (#22930),
meaning that these checks are now just testing some specific standard
library behaviour, without a particular rationale, or reason, compared
to any other standard library functionlity we use.
There has also been some discussion about our sanity checks in the
context of the libbitcoinkernel refactoring, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25065#discussion_r880668218.
Removing the checks removes the need to worry about atleast the
glibcxx checks.
Also remove the list of checks from the doc in `init.h`, because it is
incomplete, and anyone who wants to know what checks are included can
look at the function.
Guix Build (arm64):
```bash
e18a81e25b4707cbe113fb4d3ba2459013c1178e7cecfe446e4f14ee5ecd2ce8 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/SHA256SUMS.part
9928cc38b79f827018cba0bdde98666b31806afcc79dd95a00acb8e153c36eec guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz
ebf4635ba4688899ae62e4bb17ebb2afb25c538c4a8068ef515920fd4e43754e guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz
74c7e35b47c6d101fda7205f144d37150329b4c360db09d37b8c1437f3390898 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
6e12643b17be9326f1d873dfe51a52c082671540792877af624b42ca9f6e1791 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm64-apple-darwin-unsigned.dmg
1d86d0416c7a50afd7bd8d850f416b7c7277464ccc95e4dae53b5b59415fc83d guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm64-apple-darwin-unsigned.tar.gz
84070843f23839e7191ad3a667eb63c45f668eb95afbfb3fcdfb8363320f67d4 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm64-apple-darwin.tar.gz
bf6ccd7b8c40476b1dc52b491757313ea3e96c43a01c8aabaf39f94dc1837329 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/dist-archive/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1.tar.gz
25e7e1ff7d8de38632abf9926343c8ba556209f3d03109c92864ffe72813a05f guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
d0398de83841607b1bf921d4553b30ad5e2d70d0570e96a2eaaf2762e1103c79 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-powerpc64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
f09cdc2ac2a2bb644f4749f3d74b5210ddb531594c33d127a907f0223e7793e5 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-powerpc64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
ef36a68ef4e5ee9b311df40062cd2296f897e7b1550e39e0643601cd7d469010 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
937b600a2b86304ccc5b6c71a7eaf8aa5e2020592724cef6a933a1955995480b guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-powerpc64le-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
eca4eec41e71fdf7a7b0fa4065afa49c47d3b9541ed2cb4d083ad4a0de102e37 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-powerpc64le-linux-gnu.tar.gz
981c0968c19905925a599cff357ec259c1e806bdb7691c7b52039be450bdad7c guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
89c709967f9a157256281fbf682aad246f2eaad9c2f1797c2787253cbabe12f8 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
454cd830dd382e176f5a23041fc33f93937668245481b0dd29fc04882d9528eb guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
e0812c2dc492e5c5f06e3685d19da8fb29ed38d3b32821d293ef01cb4fefbd79 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
0e7d4241d8ac882a8091fa00a7813db87a3e5afec59627e45b6c910cfdd4a7b0 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-apple-darwin-unsigned.dmg
3faaca046cbb2642445a7dd1f389ed7bf94a65de8372441c36d5cb79c030ce31 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-apple-darwin-unsigned.tar.gz
73080f032a42db679baf0d09619671ac5b9d85be84a68bdd6b6709eb0e6465bd guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.gz
07b6e1b6291404bca1044df4a45b6958b882ffb88c143ba98f1959960a394897 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
16b455f62398f4aa0d3821abb1cceb8151e31c2664e3f974a764a5b8702b50f3 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
3c1a3a6a343f17b83f3b3d47e9426eccd2d0bcc7f824cd958fcf2cf06cdc3276 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
f05afa688ea7211b0049555385fb2acc26986e24d8d00893389160e07037e693 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/SHA256SUMS.part
8bcbae67dd0746c42e1e7c7db67725a69289b08e9aa97b873d443d0aa355615d guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-win64-debug.zip
efa45e3b76e5ae08a8392d58e741325df572d92c7dd69b65d876cdcda541d2fc guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
3a8c2461ca826138c3017d06279a79b4c6bee2a507ad362aa6e424f76678596c guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-win64-unsigned.tar.gz
e56ae4f609d4e6a3ca5917a4bb763c91012ece2d236d6b62a666358791e43525 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-win64.zip
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK cc61bc2e19b1c8cb32778ef42746d32b02cc2671
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK cc61bc2e19b1c8cb32778ef42746d32b02cc2671
Tree-SHA512: 3da6aba44eef3f864fcbe897db1faa964923756e68c6a713e444b5d01c6d3542c3d7ca26678760e81a7a9e3cd40bd90622d0a7b697c27166817ba4f1023661ef
|
|
20ff4991e548630d7bb5e491fa4d69ec49369872 rpc: Capture potentially large UniValue by ref for rpcdoccheck (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Capturing it by reference instead of value should save us from making a copy of a potentially large object. Saw this while having a look at #25229 although I couldn't reproduce an actual leak, so this is not a fix for that issue.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 20ff4991e548630d7bb5e491fa4d69ec49369872
theStack:
Code-review ACK 20ff4991e548630d7bb5e491fa4d69ec49369872
furszy:
Code ACK 20ff4991
Tree-SHA512: faf7bb14e37f8324b93a39095b07693626329da47c4a1ac8929bf99385e2e0567008e959e7e8540bc7d454d08fa41cccd39f55253c9a839fa88362922058a93b
|
|
from mempool entries
885694d7941ccb601388bc8412ac1df182785ef8 doc: add release note about removal of `deprecatedrpc=fees` flag (Sebastian Falbesoner)
387ae8bc09ac211af4a4e45ea4ff22518d541d0b rpc: remove deprecated fee fields from mempool entries (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Deprecating the top-level fee fields (`fee`, `modifiedfee`, `ancestorfees` and `descendantfees`) from the mempool entries and introducing `-deprecatedrpc=fees` was done in PR #22689 (released in v23.0). For the next release v24.0, this configuration option can be removed.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 885694d7941ccb601388bc8412ac1df182785ef8
Tree-SHA512: fec6b5be5c3f0cd55738a888b390ef9271e70b2dba913a14ce82427dac002e999f93df298bb3b494f3d1b850a23d2b5b3e010e901543b0d18db9be133579e1ec
|
|
3ffc190321836f7c79f0cb21ee71d357a0e32c44 ci: Install documented packages for "Win64" CI task (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This minor change has the following benefits:
- it follows the [documented](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-windows.md#building-for-64-bit-windows) way for modern Ubuntu distros (this CI task uses jammy)
- it makes package installation time shorter as no need to install the `g++-mingw-w64-x86-64-win32` package
- (not directly related to this repo) in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml Qt 5.15.3 (but not 5.15.2) build system goes [wild](https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6231535933194240) otherwise
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 3ffc190321836f7c79f0cb21ee71d357a0e32c44
jarolrod:
ACK 3ffc190321836f7c79f0cb21ee71d357a0e32c44
Tree-SHA512: 41fd6deedb3febc90cc4f2037dfbf840d82ef5b1dd950a0ff458cae6c1b1024559b21c8e1135c2d37780e80dd3f9f9751d638120443d0d60c22ac160cf693e2a
|
|
Also dead code has been removed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
These checks were added in #4339, (see also #4081), to test
our back-compat stubs, however, those stubs no-longer exist (#22930),
meaning that these checks are now just testing some specific standard
library behaviour, without a particular rationale, or reason, compared
to any other standard library functions we use.
There has also been some discussion about the sanity checks in the
context of the libbitcoinkernel refactoring, see
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25065#discussion_r880668218.
Removing the checks removes the need to worry about atleast the glibcxx
checks.
Also remove the list of check from the doc in init.h, because it is
incomplete, and anyone who wants to know what checks are included can
look at the function.
|
|
AddrManImpl::ResolveCollisions_()
fa27ee88edbf696b7eef2efbfcf1446ec522fd85 Get time less often in AddrManImpl::ResolveCollisions_() (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
First commit split out from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24697
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK fa27ee88edbf696b7eef2efbfcf1446ec522fd85
fanquake:
ACK fa27ee88edbf696b7eef2efbfcf1446ec522fd85
Tree-SHA512: 40c8594d2a5ce02a392ac5f9f120c24c6bcd495b0bcc901fd6064dde9f6123cd109504cee7b612a9555b70cfd7759cbd6cd496d007bb374c27610d01b464191c
|
|
|
|
|
|
No such file or directory
44904aa632cbe0722a52f1907ae015f1c6338ddf multiprocess build cleanup: comment on manual dependencies (Ryan Ofsky)
6e1c16c1442ab30694a3668b45af5bfd532f1e12 multiprocess build fix: ipc/capnp/init.capnp.h: No such file or directory (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Error was reported by SatoriHoshiAiko in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25207 and happens unpredictably because make doesn't always build dependencies in the same order.
The source file `src/ipc/capnp/protocol.cpp` includes some generated headers so needs to have an explicit dependency specified in the makefile so the headers will be generated before the file is compiled. #19160 added the explicit dependency, but it was incorrect because it referred to an old file path from before the source file was renamed (`ipc.cpp` -> `protocol.cpp`)
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 44904aa632cbe0722a52f1907ae015f1c6338ddf
Tree-SHA512: 578ef4ef35a97e9d8d4e6d4edf39e57a32674234bf145e8159268324cb6ba15b420517afc07f6f42bb11a562954ea74af686c3fb92ce178c1fc378421b352531
|
|
specific prevouts
418557034055f740951294e7677ae9fd5149ea9b Add RPC to get mempool txs spending outputs (t-bast)
Pull request description:
We add an RPC to fetch mempool transactions spending any of the given outpoints.
Without this RPC, application developers need to first call `getrawmempool` which returns a long list of `txid`, then fetch each of these transactions individually (`getrawtransaction`) to check whether they spend the given outpoints, which wastes a lot of bandwidth (in the worst case we need to transfer the whole mempool).
For example in lightning, when we discover that one of our channel funding transactions has been spent, we need to find the spending transaction to claim our outputs from it. We are currently forced to fetch the whole mempool to do the analysis ourselves, which is quite costly.
I believe that this RPC is also generally useful when doing some introspection on your mempool after one of your transactions failed to broadcast, for example when you implement RBF at the application level. Fetching and analyzing the conflicting transaction gives you more information to successfully replace it.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
re-utACK 418557034055f740951294e7677ae9fd5149ea9b
vincenzopalazzo:
re-ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24408/commits/418557034055f740951294e7677ae9fd5149ea9b
danielabrozzoni:
re-tACK 418557034055f740951294e7677ae9fd5149ea9b
w0xlt:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24408/commits/418557034055f740951294e7677ae9fd5149ea9b
Tree-SHA512: 206687efb720308b7e0b6cf16dd0a994006c0b5a290c8eb386917a80130973a6356d0d5cae1c63a01bb29e066dd721594969db106cba7249214fcac90d2c3dbc
|
|
UpdatePackagesForAdded at beginning of addPackageTxs
7036cf52aa080d2a63993c2298555252d507dd2f Delete UpdatePackagesForAdded at beginning of addPackageTxs. (KevinMusgrave)
Pull request description:
In `CreateNewBlock` (in miner.cpp), `inBlock` is cleared before `addPackageTxs`, so `inBlock` will be empty in the first call to `UpdatePackagesForAdded`. I saw this brought up in these [PR review club logs](https://bitcoincore.reviews/24538) and there didn't seem to be a definitive answer for why the call is necessary. There's also an [old PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10200) where this change was going to be applied, but it got closed.
If `addPackageTxs` can be called when `inBlock` is not empty, then maybe a test should be added for that case. All the tests seem to pass with this deletion.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK 7036cf52aa080d2a63993c2298555252d507dd2f
Tree-SHA512: 9e757b71b9035f68a0c6fef229b8cd83f1bdbe23f05bb02cc1bab8c3c177805b388bceb2bb1f0bce354791ccb29f351a6c51979b96ffe4d9fc6c978f83e36afc
|
|
7e9fe6d800ee8f3381e8f6ad2371f7775c68fad9 windeploy: Renewed windows code signing certificate (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The current windows code signing certificate expires on May 26 23:59:59 2022 GMT. I have purchased a new code signing certificate which will expire on May 29 23:59:59 2024 GMT.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7e9fe6d800ee8f3381e8f6ad2371f7775c68fad9
fanquake:
ACK 7e9fe6d800ee8f3381e8f6ad2371f7775c68fad9 - tested above with OpenSSL 3 & faketime.
Tree-SHA512: 283eb863d4db0573c7e78fe9d8f1b855533fc45b0995cd2d66e40b5242eb9bc9317b01e1b151fe49d512cd4aa6c48e2390017070f79db46493813fdd0a0f568a
|
|
detect LogPrintLevel, mention WalletLogPrintf
75848ec2daa43b648cf497c59924d389e8243320 scripts and tools: update lint-logs.py to detect LogPrintLevel() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #24464 that added the `LogPrintLevel()` macro.
- update the `lint-logs.py` script to detect `LogPrintLevel()`
- add `WalletLogPrintf()` (already detected but not mentioned) to the linter suggestion
Example output:
```
$ test/lint/lint-logs.py
All calls to LogPrintf(), LogPrint(), LogPrintLevel(), and WalletLogPrintf() should be terminated with "\n".
src/addrdb.cpp:147: LogPrintf("banlist.dat ignored because it can only be read by " PACKAGE_NAME " version 22.x. Remove %s to silence this warning.", fs::quoted(fs::PathToString(m_banlist_dat)));
src/addrman.cpp:388: LogPrint(BCLog::ADDRMAN, "addrman lost %i new and %i tried addresses due to collisions or invalid addresses", nLostUnk, nLost);
src/banman.cpp:41: LogPrintf("Recreating the banlist database");
src/banman.cpp:66: LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Flushed %d banned node addresses/subnets to disk %dms", banmap.size(),
src/banman.cpp:194: LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Removed banned node address/subnet: %s", sub_net.ToString());
src/net.cpp:2092: LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Trying to make an anchor connection to %s", addrConnect.ToString());
src/net.cpp:2408: LogPrintLevel(BCLog::Level::Error, BCLog::NET, "%s", strError.original);
src/net.cpp:2416: LogPrintf("%s", strError.original);
src/net.cpp:2432: LogPrintf("%s", strError.original);
src/net.cpp:2453: LogPrintLevel(BCLog::Level::Error, BCLog::NET, "%s", strError.original);
src/netbase.cpp:573: LogPrintf("wait for connect to %s failed: %s",
src/netbase.cpp:578: LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "connection attempt to %s timed out", addrConnect.ToString());
src/netbase.cpp:590: LogPrintf("getsockopt() for %s failed: %s", addrConnect.ToString(), NetworkErrorString(WSAGetLastError()));
src/wallet/wallet.cpp:186: wallet->WalletLogPrintf("Releasing wallet");
src/wallet/wallet.cpp:1809: WalletLogPrintf("Rescan completed in %15dms", duration_milliseconds.count());
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 75848ec2daa43b648cf497c59924d389e8243320
Tree-SHA512: 78b3bc4428aaec2d198e1ff1c44b614fa2f2a228feb6303d97765136e4796171928d341c6e55a1d4e9e5a82ab099b14fee562b878dcf7bd2276f87bd9a8d323e
|
|
uninitialized variables
c4c5b9ca6e98cf44309af73edf5559940a04d00f consensus/params: set default values for BIP9Deployment (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Adds default values for `vDeployments` in `consensus/params.h` so that undefined behaviour is avoided if a deployment is not initialized. Also adds a check in the unit tests to alert if this is happening, since even if it doesn't invoke undefined behaviour it's probably a mistake.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK c4c5b9ca6e98cf44309af73edf5559940a04d00f
Tree-SHA512: 22d7ff86a817d9e9e67c47301fc3b7e9d5821c13565d7706711f113dea220eea29b413a7c8d029691009159cebc85a108d77cb52418734091c196bafb2b12423
|
|
`coin_selection:aps_create_tx_internal` calling logic
6b636730f4befee39d57fcfd51298f3015dbf563 tracing: fix `coin_selection:aps_create_tx_internal` calling logic (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
According to the documentation, the tracepoint `coin_selection:aps_create_tx_internal` "Is called when the second `CreateTransactionInternal` with Avoid Partial Spends enabled completes."
Currently it is only called if the second call to `CreateTransactionInternal` succeeds, i.e. the third parameter is always `true` and we don't get notified in the case that it fails. This PR fixes this by moving the tracepoint call and the `use_aps` boolean variable outside the if body.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6b636730f4befee39d57fcfd51298f3015dbf563
furszy:
re-ACK 6b636730
Tree-SHA512: 453825123aa10748642c7dd94324ced2d07df0f4fac478b0947a34820b515ae300f75721679a90a164f3127029739df55c4de035c4567e663893c3c6dbdef216
|
|
f9fdcec7e932843a91ddf7f377e00bd2a6efb82a settings: Add resetSettings() method (Ryan Ofsky)
77fabffef4ea840ee15c97061048fe8443d74658 init: Remove Shutdown() node.args reset (Ryan Ofsky)
0e55bc6e7fe439404dc56093a0949395dae51e6b settings: Add update/getPersistent/isIgnored methods (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Add `interfaces::Node` `updateSetting`, `forceSetting`, `resetSettings`, `isSettingIgnored`, and `getPersistentSetting` methods so GUI is able to manipulate `settings.json` file and use and modify node settings.
(Originally this PR also contained GUI changes to unify bitcoin-qt and bitcoind persistent settings and call these methods, but the GUI commits have been dropped from this PR and moved to bitcoin-core/gui/pull/602)
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK f9fdcec7e932843a91ddf7f377e00bd2a6efb82a
hebasto:
re-ACK f9fdcec7e932843a91ddf7f377e00bd2a6efb82a, only a function renamed since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15936#pullrequestreview-979324357).
Tree-SHA512: 4cac853ee29be96d2ff38404165b9dfb7c622b2a9c99a15979596f3484ffde0da3d9c9c372677dff5119ca7cffa6383d81037fd9889a29cc9285882a8dc0c268
|
|
43ff37f60eac1f867c798c1e3f18cb402f7ee795 Update zmq.md: Fix parameter in hwm example block (mutatrum)
Pull request description:
Looks like a copy/paste error when `zmqpubsequence` was introduced.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK 43ff37f60eac1f867c798c1e3f18cb402f7ee795
Tree-SHA512: 4d0abbba4e9fd0adc2824d0804891d677d56216d245ed0d3bffbaf76042c650edf68975d1ec4728328e69421c024fe6f8800c7e0a497934082206ea4f15cc517
|
|
be6d4315c150646cf672778e9232f086403e95df doc: remove misleading AreInputsStandard() comment (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This check isn't any longer just about bad pay-to-script-hash inputs; it
also excludes any kind of nonstandard input, unknown witness versions,
coinbases, etc.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK be6d4315c150646cf672778e9232f086403e95df
dunxen:
ACK be6d431
jonatack:
ACK be6d4315c150646cf672778e9232f086403e95df
Tree-SHA512: 1c4befadff6a7b5789901ca2a2cc39adc35c688f7e3c093ab5292123f9193ce078731016b773b3d05f7004ff01ee62f23f8362ae8d05134d41dc097ba094a42b
|
|
leveldb/libevent messages, reverse LogPrintLevel order
c4e77177276ea2b79c4675cb2678ee2cc757b743 refactor: Change LogPrintLevel order to category, severity (laanwj)
ce920713bf0810614c2c0c994511b50d4f660bce leveldb: Log messages from leveldb with category and debug level (laanwj)
18ec120bb9e1fc9d27d2419da4c580bd3cde7e86 http: Use severity-based logging for messages from libevent (laanwj)
bd971bffb02c7b06aac9a479f7e5ed8f71de2bec logging: Unconditionally log levels >= WARN (laanwj)
Pull request description:
Log messages from leveldb and libevent libraries in the severity+level based log format introduced in bitcoin/bitcoin#24464.
Example of messages before:
```
2022-05-24T18:11:57Z [libevent] libevent: event_add: event: 0x55da963fcc10 (fd 10), EV_READ call 0x7f1c7a254620
2022-05-24T18:11:57Z [libevent] libevent: Epoll ADD(1) on fd 10 okay. Old events were 0; read change was 1 (add); write change was 0 (none); close change was 0 (none)
2022-05-24T18:12:08Z leveldb: Generated table #609127@1: 6445 keys, 312916 bytes
2022-05-24T18:12:08Z leveldb: Generated table #609128@1: 5607 keys, 268548 bytes
2022-05-24T18:12:08Z leveldb: Generated table #609129@1: 189 keys, 9384 bytes
2022-05-24T18:12:08Z leveldb: Generated table #609130@1: 293 keys, 13818 bytes
```
Example of messages after:
```
2022-05-24T17:59:52Z [libevent:debug] event_add: event: 0x5652f44dac10 (fd 10), EV_READ call 0x7f210f2e6620
2022-05-24T17:59:52Z [libevent:debug] Epoll ADD(1) on fd 10 okay. Old events were 0; read change was 1 (add); write change was 0 (none); close change was 0 (none)
2022-05-24T17:59:53Z [leveldb:debug] Recovering log #1072
2022-05-24T17:59:53Z [leveldb:debug] Level-0 table #1082: started
2022-05-24T17:59:53Z [leveldb:debug] Level-0 table #1082: 193 bytes OK
2022-05-24T17:59:53Z [leveldb:debug] Delete type=3 #1070
2022-05-24T17:59:53Z [leveldb:debug] Delete type=0 #1072
```
The first commit changes it so that messages with level Warning and Error are always logged independent of the `-debug` setting. I think this is useful to make sure warnings and errors, which tend to be important, are not lost. In the future this should be made more configurable.
Last commit changes LogPrintLevel argument order to category, severity: This is more consistent with the other functions, as well as with the logging output itself. If we want to make this change, we should do it before it's all over the place.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Tested ACK c4e77177276ea2b79c4675cb2678ee2cc757b743
Tree-SHA512: ea48a1517f8c1b23760e59933bbd64ebf09c32eb947e31b8c2696b4630ac1f4303b126720183e2de052bcede3a17e475bbf3fbb6378a12b0fa8f3582d610930d
|
|
and add WalletLogPrintf() (already detected) to the lint-logs.py suggestion
Co-authored-by: laanwj <126646+laanwj@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
`ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot`
bd7c5e2f0a1b572decdf3a4bafe4ee990e1f4953 Add BIP-341 specified constraints to `ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot` (David Bakin)
Pull request description:
[**N.B.:** This PR **_does not change the consensus_**. It only adds `assert` statements according to the current consensus in consensus-sensitive code (`interpreter.cpp`). So that's why the bot added the "consensus" tag and I prefixed the PR title with "consensus".]
BIP 341 specifies [constraints on the size of the control block _c_ used to compute the taproot merkle root](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki#script-validation-rules).
> The last stack element is called the control block _c_, and must have length _33 + 32m_, for a value of _m_ that is an integer between 0 and 128, inclusive. Fail if it does not have such a length.
The actual merkle root is computed in `ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot` ([interpreter.cpp@1833](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/script/interpreter.cpp#L1833)) - this code does _not_ check these constraints.
All the callers do check the constraints before calling `ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot`. But in the future there may be more callers, and these checks may be inadvertently omitted at those future calls. Also, code at/near the current call sites may also change and skip these checks. Therefore _this PR adds those checks as `asserts` directly in `ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot`_ to help prevent that error.
No unit tests provided: they'd have to be death tests as these are `assert` statements which raise `SIGABRT` and kill the program. Boost Test has a way to implement death tests (see the in-progress draft PR #25097 at [this code (you may have to click to expand the diff)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25097/files#diff-21483d0e032747850208f21325b29cde89e9c1f55f83a7a166a388cc5c27115aR1089) and could be added here if desired by reviewers.
Current callers of `ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot`:
- `InferTaprootTree` ([standard.cpp@1552](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/script/standard.cpp#L546))
- `VerifyTaprootCommittment` ([interpreter.cpp@1859](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/script/interpreter.cpp#L1859)) does a partial check, but it is called from `VerifyWitnessProgram` ([interpreter.cpp@1922](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/script/interpreter.cpp#L1918)) where a full check is done
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK bd7c5e2f0a1b572decdf3a4bafe4ee990e1f4953
theStack:
ACK bd7c5e2f0a1b572decdf3a4bafe4ee990e1f4953
Tree-SHA512: cec5aebfdf9fc9d13011abdf8427c934edf1df1ffc32b3e7cc5580f12809f24cf83e64ab0c843fabfce3591873bfcfa248277b30820fd786684319a196e4e550
|
|
fee rate.
c97e961d4652acfc55fd50273cf0a20beb4857e0 fuzz: coinselection, add missing fee rate. (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25083#issuecomment-1136774756.
Without the fee rate, 'GroupOutputs' will crash at group insertion time `OutputGroup::Insert` because now `output.GetEffectiveValue()` asserts that the value exists.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c97e961d4652acfc55fd50273cf0a20beb4857e0
ishaanam:
ACK c97e961d4652acfc55fd50273cf0a20beb4857e0
Xekyo:
ACK c97e961d4652acfc55fd50273cf0a20beb4857e0
brunoerg:
ACK c97e961d4652acfc55fd50273cf0a20beb4857e0
Tree-SHA512: f495886a5078842103e0f05a9018d7cb491967d8362f893dd7b21132b98e94321df860c50acb69e84d7232779f5915322ca6b5f99908e05e0480012580ee9d5d
|
|
Also move manual dependency closer to actual build target
|
|
|
|
BIP 341 specifies constraints on the size of the control block _c_ used
to compute the taproot merkle root.
> The last stack element is called the control block _c_, and must have
> length _33 + 32m_, for a value of m that is an integer between 0 and
> 128, inclusive. Fail if it does not have such a length.
(See BIP-341 "Script Validation Rules" here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki#script-validation-rules)
|
|
Otherwise, 'GroupOutputs' will crash at group insertion time (output.GetEffectiveValue() asserts that the value exists).
|
|
Error was reported by SatoriHoshiAiko in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25207 and happens unpredictably
because make doesn't always build dependencies in the same order.
The source file src/ipc/capnp/protocol.cpp includes some generated headers so
needs to have an explicit dependency specified in the makefile so the headers
will be generated before the file is compiled. #19160 added the explicit
dependency, but it was incorrect because it referred to an old file path from
before the source file was renamed (ipc.cpp -> protocol.cpp)
|
|
This check isn't any longer just about bad pay-to-script-hash inputs; it
also excludes any kind of nonstandard input, unknown witness versions,
coinbases, etc.
|
|
for merging
d4b3dc5b0a726cc4cc7a8467be43126e78f841cf contrib: Remove keys that are no longer used for merging (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
See:
- https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2021-10-21#726591
- https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2021-12-09#750000
Also updated `trusted-git-root` to be right after **meshcollider**'s last merge.
The latest similar change was bitcoin/bitcoin#7713.
A related discussion on [IRC](https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2021-10-22#727090):
> [12:28](https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2021-10-22#727090) \<MarcoFalke> jonasschnelli: I was about to ask you whether you planned to remove your fingerprint from the "trusted-keys" for merging, but it looks like this will break verify-commits ...
> [12:31](https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2021-10-22#727091) \<laanwj> you would also have a add all his merge commits to exceptions, i guess
> [12:32](https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2021-10-22#727092) \<laanwj> or patch the script to allow different key for different ranges of commits
> [13:15](https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2021-10-22#727118) \<jonasschnelli> MarcoFalke: I had no plan to remove my keyid,… would that make sense and how would you fix verify commits?
> [13:16](https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2021-10-22#727119) \<jonasschnelli> Ideally, we should set en expiration date next to those keyid
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK d4b3dc5b0a726cc4cc7a8467be43126e78f841cf
Tree-SHA512: 6c23c932288b56b546a9ba45288205fae063e3f98ff308393acffd5d79eb5097417de1c3d8e865a3f66734740ca2388b2452c3c810e45cdf3b15ccfa215f574e
|
|
This is more consistent with the other functions, as well as with the
logging output itself. If we want to make this change, we should do it
before it's all over the place.
|
|
|
|
Map libevent's severity to our own severity level for logging.
|
|
Messages with level `WARN` or higher should be logged even when
the category is not provided with `-debug=`, to make sure important
warnings are not lost.
|
|
This makes the code less verbose. Also, future changes that change how
to get the time are less verbose.
Moreover, GetAdjustedTime() might arbitrarily change the value during
the execution of this function. For example, the system time advances
over a second boundary, or the network adjusts the time arbitrarily.
Most of the time however the value will not change, so it seems better
to always lock the value in this scope for clarity.
|
|
-blockfilterindex
295ff61934f8adea04dabb47695070e2cfd0548e test: add coverage for unknown -blockfilterindex (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following init error:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/44037a29129a830fd9c9580f0818387756cfd7d3/src/init.cpp#L844
Passing an unknown value to -blockfilterindex should throw an error.
ACKs for top commit:
dunxen:
cr-ACK 295ff61
Tree-SHA512: 1444903cf0696406c485ce0575f951d527fe7d699094d5845622c0b57c954d6d7dcf1e78ef0c4e8b9b26f53b79583f07fec0e8d8e7f04aa744d2a8cd98329db9
|
|
--enable-debug and CI
bd5dbc30dbef10f0fb4508b461e77787213aa0de doc: update developer notes wrt --enable-debug and DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION (Jon Atack)
345647c4da12b5a0f9c6fd7e519df743264f5611 ci: add DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION to CI task containing DEBUG_LOCKORDER (Jon Atack)
247d17033f2727e9f7d5dddecaea37c46f1230ee build: add DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION to --enable-debug configuration (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
- Add `DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION` flag to the `--enable-debug` configuration
- Add `DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION` to the native tsan CI task that contains `DEBUG_LOCKORDER` (verified that the CI has all logging categories enabled by default, except libevent and leveldb)
- Update the developer notes that `--enable-debug` configures `DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION`
Related to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24709.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 8e9c068d9a4841ad1ab08a2bf4ce96d6fee195e458f6802852cba0d71deb9a485059d355ac8bd1fc15410437f19503b77fc425bf53a1d48dc82a43a979daad17
|
|
|
|
From the output here:
src/qt/test/addressbooktests.cpp:185: wilcard ==> wildcard
src/qt/test/addressbooktests.cpp:191: wilcard ==> wildcard
src/test/miniscript_tests.cpp:227: nd ==> and, 2nd
src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp:260: everytime ==> every time
src/util/time.h:89: precicion ==> precision
src/util/time.h:90: precicion ==> precision
^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/spelling.ignore-words.txt
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5275612980969472?logs=lint#L849
I added 'nd' to the spelling.ignored-words.txt, as it's valid miniscript.
|