| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
f1684bb88a878eb3f54e945db39ea69b14256eef rpc: mention that migratewallet can take a while (Andrew Chow)
9ecff997e164e70c5958116b20ed441404ccd6f3 rpc: Drop migratewallet experimental warning (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The migration process itself hasn't fundamentally changed since it was added, so I think it's reasonable to say that it is no longer experimental.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK f1684bb88a878eb3f54e945db39ea69b14256eef
josibake:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28037/commits/f1684bb88a878eb3f54e945db39ea69b14256eef
furszy:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/f1684bb88a878eb3f54e945db39ea69b14256eef
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f1684bb88a878eb3f54e945db39ea69b14256eef
willcl-ark:
ACK f1684bb88a878eb3f54e945db39ea69b14256eef
Tree-SHA512: 99b176cddbf3878c76bd4c80c030106200bf03139785e26dbae3341e1a675b623a13cd6dc7a0bb78344335bf859ae7548d97b2b58eb650c6e7b305d7cdc86e40
|
|
3b0ec06d6228d965e9cf9121c5dd300da2a930ea doc: Update translation_process.md (pablomartin4btc)
Pull request description:
Updating Transifex broken link and setup Transifex config file with a token.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 3b0ec06d6228d965e9cf9121c5dd300da2a930ea.
hernanmarino:
ACK 3b0ec06d6228d965e9cf9121c5dd300da2a930ea
Tree-SHA512: fc8e537a7d244e2e5983763ff7bd017a796359b2baf2119809c2fa051f43ba8a7bcbf5aef0687bc86c8badf5abc4b67cf2e0252f9e2ee14cafb50612dd51f3f7
|
|
Updating Transifex broken link and remove Transifex config file
section as it has been outdated.
|
|
freeze
3d1bb1a122a037e966c2fb2e2113f0440edb8d93 qt: Update translation source file for v27.0 string freeze (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR updates the `src/qt/locale/bitcoin_en.xlf` translation source file according to the [Release schedule for 27.0](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29028).
Note for reviewers: it is expected to get a zero diff after running `make -C src translate` locally.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 3d1bb1a122a037e966c2fb2e2113f0440edb8d93
Tree-SHA512: 9b6e5aa3aaabb918d0a6418559bc3eb14297abc48b99e8c6e6de770aa1478b8b28881f8965fd15fe23cf4aa377b88ba903e978c8b75681c4f11e428ca1588b96
|
|
'EraseRecords' performance
77331aa2a198b708372a5c6cdf331faf7e2968ef wallet: simplify EraseRecords by using 'ErasePrefix' (furszy)
33757814ceb04102141d3fd5ef2f87abf0422310 wallet: bdb batch 'ErasePrefix', do not create txn internally (furszy)
cf4d72a75e9603e947b3d47e1f3ac7c7f37bb401 wallet: db, introduce 'RunWithinTxn()' helper function (furszy)
Pull request description:
Seeks to optimize and simplify `WalletBatch::EraseRecords`. Currently, this process opens a cursor to iterate over the entire database, searching for records that match the type prefixes, to then call the `WalletBatch::Erase` function for each of the matching records.
This PR rewrites this 40-line manual process into a single line; instead of performing all of those actions manually, we can simply utilize the `ErasePrefix()` functionality. The result is 06216b344dea6ad6c385fda0b37808ff9ae5273b.
Moreover, it expands the test coverage for the `ErasePrefix` functionality and documents the db txn requirement for `BerkeleyBatch::ErasePrefix` .
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
reACK 77331aa2a198b708372a5c6cdf331faf7e2968ef
josibake:
code review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29403/commits/77331aa2a198b708372a5c6cdf331faf7e2968ef
Tree-SHA512: 9f78dda658677ff19b5979ba0efd11cf9fabf3d315feb79ed1160526f010fe843c41903fc18c0b092f78aa88bc874cf24edad8fc1ea6e96aabdc4fd1daf21ca5
|
|
`NetWhitelist{bind}Permissions::TryParse`
864e2e9097de8f1fda63137f803687dd5cc96c03 fuzz: increase length of string used for `NetWhitelist{bind}Permissions::TryParse` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
The string `s` represents the value from `-whitelist`/`-whitebind` (e.g. "bloom,forcerelay,noban@1.2.3.4:32") and it is used in `NetWhitelistPermissions::TryParse` and `NetWhitebindPermissions::TryParse`. However, a max length of 32 is not enough to cover a lot of cases. Even disconsidering the permissions, 32 would not be enough to cover a lot of addresses. This PR fixes it.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 864e2e9097de8f1fda63137f803687dd5cc96c03
epiccurious:
utACK 864e2e9097de8f1fda63137f803687dd5cc96c03.
vasild:
ACK 864e2e9097de8f1fda63137f803687dd5cc96c03
Tree-SHA512: 2b89031b9f2ea92d636f05fd167b1e5ac726742a7e7c1af8ddaeaf90236e659731aaa6b7c23f65ec16ce52ac1b9e68e7b16e23c59e355312d057e001976d172a
|
|
when mempool not empty
8d20602e555dfe026b421363ee32cfca17c674d8 test, assumeutxo: Add test to ensure failure when mempool not empty (Hernan Marino)
Pull request description:
Add a test to ensure that loadtxoutset fails when the node's mempool is not empty, as suggested by maflcko here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27596#discussion_r1344713537
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK 8d20602e555dfe026b421363ee32cfca17c674d8
BrandonOdiwuor:
ACK 8d20602e555dfe026b421363ee32cfca17c674d8
Tree-SHA512: 97c9668c0f38897934bf0d326515d898d4e682ff219deba9d751b35125b5cf33d51c9df116a74117ecf0394f28995a3d0cae1266b1e5acb4365ff4f309ce3f6c
|
|
6b161cb82a9766ef814f05e5b8f019f15d5ee14d [test] second child of a v3 tx can be replaced individually (glozow)
5c998a696c7a4ff2a91fe3d8c7177d2b806eb7ac [refactor] use MAX_PUBKEYS_PER_MULTISIG instead of magic numbers in test (glozow)
a9346421db813ebb1233f6477fe924e2f7c562ad [test] PackageV3Checks with inheritance violation in mempool ancestor (glozow)
63b62e123e38cb92c2135e63eb1a5b760c11dd4e [doc] fix docs and comments from v3 (glozow)
Pull request description:
Addresses final comments from #28948:
- thread at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28948#discussion_r1483245289, using https://github.com/ismaelsadeeq/bitcoin/commit/87fc7f0a8d8ad1fc2af60ee6cc678df5e6fb01dd with some modifications
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28948#discussion_r1483769698
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28948#discussion_r1483776227
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28948#discussion_r1484427635
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28948#discussion_r1484467280
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28948#discussion_r1484531064
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28948#discussion_r1484992098
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28948#discussion_r1484992336
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28948#discussion_r1484994642
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 6b161cb82a9766ef814f05e5b8f019f15d5ee14d
sdaftuar:
utACK 6b161cb82a9766ef814f05e5b8f019f15d5ee14d
Tree-SHA512: 584fce7810f4d704ee6ab51fdc7d42bab342140cae3d076f89b5e1966dd1dd8293cb25b3121e41a4dcd65f9d4a735102b9ab2e90f98aa770b84e21f4d35d63d3
|
|
wallet_reorgrestore.py
44d11532f80705b790bc6e28df9a96ac54b25f9b test: fix intermittent failure in wallet_reorgrestore.py (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
By adding a missing `sync_blocks` call.
There was a race at `node2` between connecting the block produced by `node0`, and using `-generate` to create new blocks itself. In the failed run, block generation started before connecting the block, resulting in a final block height that was smaller by 1 than expected.
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29392#issuecomment-1939541603 for a more detailed analysis of the failed run.
Can be reproduced by adding a sleep to [this spot](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/6ff0aa089c01ff3e610ecb47814ed739d685a14c/src/validation.cpp#L4217) in `ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlock()`:
```
if (util::ThreadGetInternalName() == "msghand") {
std::this_thread::sleep_for(0.2s);
}
```
which fails for me on master and succeeds with the fix.
Fixes #29392
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 44d11532f80705b790bc6e28df9a96ac54b25f9b
Tree-SHA512: c08699e5ae348d4c0626022b519449d052f511d3f44601bcd8dac836a130a3f67fca149532e1e3690367ebfdcbcdd32e527170d039209c1f599ce861136ae29f
|
|
The diff is produced by running `make -C src translate`.
|
|
...by adding a missing sync_blocks call.
There was a race at node2 between connecting the block
produced by node 0, and using -generate to create new blocks
itself. In the failed run, the latter happened first,
resulting in a final block height that was smaller by 1 than
expected.
|
|
|
|
Transactions are intended to be started on upper layers rather than
internally by the bdb batch object. This enables us to consolidate
different write operations within a procedure in the same db txn,
improving consistency due to the atomic property of the transaction,
as well as its performance due to the reduction of disk write
operations.
Important Note:
This approach also ensures that the BerkeleyBatch::ErasePrefix
function behaves exactly as the SQLiteBatch::ErasePrefix function,
which does not create a db txn internally.
Furthermore, since the `BerkeleyBatch::ErasePrefix' implementation
erases records one by one (by traversing the db), this change
ensures that the function is always called within an active txn
context. Without this measure, there's a potential risk to consistency;
certain records may be removed while others could persist due to an
internal failure during the procedure.
|
|
'RunWithinTxn()' provides a way to execute db operations within a
transactional context. It avoids writing repetitive boilerplate code for
starting and committing the database transaction.
|
|
9a3c5c8697659e34d0476103af942a4615818f4e scripted-diff: rename ZapSelectTx to RemoveTxs (furszy)
83b762845f5804f23b63526d403b2f327fe99632 wallet: batch and simplify ZapSelectTx process (furszy)
595d50a1032ad7ffa9945464c86aa57f16665e93 wallet: migration, remove extra NotifyTransactionChanged call (furszy)
a2b071f9920c2f4893afcc43a152f593c03966bf wallet: ZapSelectTx, remove db rewrite code (furszy)
Pull request description:
Work decoupled from #28574. Brother of #28894.
Includes two different, yet interconnected, performance and code improvements to the zap wallet transactions process.
1) As the goal of the `ZapSelectTx` function is to erase tx records that match any of the inputted hashes. There is no need to traverse the whole database record by record. We could just check if the tx exist, and remove it directly by calling `EraseTx()`.
2) Instead of performing single write operations per removed tx record, this PR batches them all within a single atomic db txn.
Moreover, these changes will enable us to consolidate all individual write operations that take place during the wallet migration process into a single db txn in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9a3c5c8697659e34d0476103af942a4615818f4e
josibake:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28987/commits/9a3c5c8697659e34d0476103af942a4615818f4e
Tree-SHA512: fb2ecc48224c400ab3b1fbb32e174b5b13bf03794717727f80f01f55fb183883b067a68c0a127b2de8885564da15425d021a96541953bf38a72becc2e9929ccf
|
|
attempting unlock
517c7f9cba306292e12e166b9dbc6c0838f05b27 gui: Check for private keys disabled before attempting unlock (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Before trying to unlock a wallet, first check if it has private keys disabled. If so, there is no need to unlock.
Note that such wallets are not expected to occur in typical usage. However bugs in previous versions allowed such wallets to be created, and so we need to handle them.
Fixes #772
For some additional context, see #631
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 517c7f9cba306292e12e166b9dbc6c0838f05b27, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
BrandonOdiwuor:
ACK 517c7f9cba306292e12e166b9dbc6c0838f05b27
Tree-SHA512: c92aa34344d04667b70b059d2aa0a1da999cb7239cd1413f3009781aa82379f309ff9808d7dc91d385e2c8afe2abda3564568e2091ef833b1536ebfcf80f7c3c
|
|
Co-authored-by: ismaelsadeeq <ask4ismailsadiq@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9d37886a3b6ce24f4a4a05193eb0d071655a8457 gui: Update Node window title with chain type (pablomartin4btc)
Pull request description:
It fixes #544.
Enhance the Node window title by appending the chain type to it, except for the `mainnet`, mirroring the behavior in the main window.
There was also some [interest](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/78#issuecomment-695755972) on this while discussing network switching.
ACKs for top commit:
MarnixCroes:
tACK 9d37886a3b6ce24f4a4a05193eb0d071655a8457
hernanmarino:
tACK 9d37886a3b6ce24f4a4a05193eb0d071655a8457
BrandonOdiwuor:
tested ACK 9d37886a3b6ce24f4a4a05193eb0d071655a8457
alfonsoromanz:
Tested ACK https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/758/commits/9d37886a3b6ce24f4a4a05193eb0d071655a8457
kristapsk:
ACK 9d37886a3b6ce24f4a4a05193eb0d071655a8457
hebasto:
ACK 9d37886a3b6ce24f4a4a05193eb0d071655a8457, tested on Ubuntu 23.10.
Tree-SHA512: 8c34c4586bd59b1c522662e8aa0726dccc8f12e020f7a6a1af5200a29e5817e1c51e0f467c7923041fc41535ea093c3e0dd787befbbcc84d6b9f7ff0d969db04
|
|
user has touched it
bee0ffbecf4f95b65f4084893924a1ab250ca77c GUI/Intro: Never change the prune checkbox after the user has touched it (Luke Dashjr)
420a983e25d2f3ac3cc4d537bf223682be651604 Bugfix: GUI/Intro: Disable GUI prune option if -prune is set, regardless of set value (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Re-PR from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18729
Now includes a bugfix too (`-prune=2+` disabled the checkbox, but `-prune=0/1` did not; this behaviour is necessary since `-prune` overrides GUI settings)
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK bee0ffbecf4f95b65f4084893924a1ab250ca77c, both commits are improvements of the current behaviour. Tested on Ubuntu 23.10.
Tree-SHA512: 8eb7d90af37deb30fe226179db3bc9df8ab59e4f3218c8e447ed31fc9ddc81ac1a1629da63347518587a56a4c8558b05cf7ec474024c5f5dfc6d49d6ff0eb0cc
|
|
fa0ceae970242d8d6bdef150c98f04c67b06e20c test: Fix utxo set hash serialisation signedness (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is unsigned in Bitcoin Core, so the tests should match it:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/5b8990a1f3c49b0b02b7383c69e95320acbda13e/src/kernel/coinstats.cpp#L54
Large positive values for the block height are too difficult to hit in tests, but it still seems fine to fix this.
The bug was introduced when the code was written in 6ccc8fc067bf516cda7bc5d7d721945be5ac2003.
(Lowercase `i` means signed, see https://docs.python.org/3/library/struct.html#format-characters)
ACKs for top commit:
epiccurious:
Tested ACK fa0ceae970242d8d6bdef150c98f04c67b06e20c.
fjahr:
utACK fa0ceae970242d8d6bdef150c98f04c67b06e20c
Tree-SHA512: ab4405c74fb191fff8520b456d3a800cd084d616bb9ddca27d56b8e5c8969bd537490f6e204c1870dbb09a3e130b03b22a27b6644252a024059c200bbd9004e7
|
|
if no wallet is selected
b2e531e70a88f5c9e1c055ae7341520a3128e15d qt: update widgets availability on wallet selection (pablomartin4btc)
Pull request description:
This PR addresses an issue where, with no wallet selected, ticking on "Settings -> Mask values" checkbox twice enables the transaction tab when the checkbox is unticked.
<details>
<summary>Current behavior display on master</summary>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Correction display from this branch</summary>
</details>
Note for maintaners: this PR should be backported to both 25.x and 26.x.
---
Originally this PR was disabling the "Mask Values" checkbox when no wallet was selected but since a reviewer pointed out that a user might want to open a wallet already on "privacy mode" I rolled that change out.
<details>
<summary>Original correction display disabling "Mask Values" </summary>
</details>
ACKs for top commit:
alfonsoromanz:
Tested ACK https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/780/commits/b2e531e70a88f5c9e1c055ae7341520a3128e15d
hebasto:
ACK b2e531e70a88f5c9e1c055ae7341520a3128e15d, tested on Ubuntu 22.04.
Tree-SHA512: 6be77ab4d5ec86267a9b0a289a4d8600bb67d279f7e0be65e47b608ec392fe705cf026e32f3c082d2f27449b697d1d9e6a1d110035900d7a804ba823c9f5dfd4
|
|
BIP21 URIs
ede5014c445dcb40ddcfdede2c51236bbfe85f5e Modify command line help to show support for BIP21 URIs (Hernan Marino)
Pull request description:
While reviewing a different PR (see https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/742 ) **hebasto** suggested that the help for bitcoin-qt should be updated to reflect the fact that bitcoin-qt supports an optional BIP21 URI parameter.
Since this reflects actual behaviour of bitcoin-qt and is independent of whether or not the other PR gets merged, I created this simple PR to fix the help message.
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
utACK ede5014c445dcb40ddcfdede2c51236bbfe85f5e
pablomartin4btc:
lgtm, re ACK ede5014c445dcb40ddcfdede2c51236bbfe85f5e
hebasto:
ACK ede5014c445dcb40ddcfdede2c51236bbfe85f5e.
Tree-SHA512: c456297c486bc5cc65e0e092e7ba9d51b0bd7a584d4fabca7f7ca1f8e58cbcc66e96226539c689ed0f5e7f40da220bbc4ea30b90e31e1aeeb8867a385a90209c
|
|
29029df5c700e6940c712028303761d91ae15847 [doc] v3 signaling in mempool-replacements.md (glozow)
e643ea795e4b6fea4a6bbb3d72870ee6a4c836b1 [fuzz] v3 transactions and sigop-adjusted vsize (glozow)
1fd16b5c62f54c7f4c60122acd65d852f63d1e8b [functional test] v3 transaction submission (glozow)
27c8786ba918a42c860e6a50eaee9fdf56d7c646 test framework: Add and use option for tx-version in MiniWallet methods (MarcoFalke)
9a1fea55b29fe025355b06b45e3d77d192acc635 [policy/validation] allow v3 transactions with certain restrictions (glozow)
eb8d5a2e7d939dd3ee683486e98702079e0dfcc0 [policy] add v3 policy rules (glozow)
9a29d470fbb62bbb27d517efeafe46ff03c25f54 [rpc] return full string for package_msg and package-error (glozow)
158623b8e0726dff7eae4288138f1710e727db9c [refactor] change Workspace::m_conflicts and adjacent funcs/structs to use Txid (glozow)
Pull request description:
See #27463 for overall package relay tracking.
Delving Bitcoin discussion thread: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/v3-transaction-policy-for-anti-pinning/340
Delving Bitcoin discussion for LN usage: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/lightning-transactions-with-v3-and-ephemeral-anchors/418
Rationale:
- There are various pinning problems with RBF and our general ancestor/descendant limits. These policies help mitigate many pinning attacks and make package RBF feasible (see #28984 which implements package RBF on top of this). I would focus the most here on Rule 3 pinning. [1][2]
- Switching to a cluster-based mempool (see #27677 and #28676) requires the removal of CPFP carve out, which applications depend on. V3 + package RBF + ephemeral anchors + 1-parent-1-child package relay provides an intermediate solution.
V3 policy is for "Priority Transactions." [3][4] It allows users to opt in to more restrictive topological limits for shared transactions, in exchange for the more robust fee-bumping abilities that offers. Even though we don't have cluster limits, we are able to treat these transactions as having as having a maximum cluster size of 2.
Immediate benefits:
- You can presign a transaction with 0 fees (not just 1sat/vB!) and add a fee-bump later.
- Rule 3 pinning is reduced by a significant amount, since the attacker can only attach a maximum of 1000vB to your shared transaction.
This also enables some other cool things (again see #27463 for overall roadmap):
- Ephemeral Anchors
- Package RBF for these 1-parent-1-child packages. That means e.g. a commitment tx + child can replace another commitment tx using the child's fees.
- We can transition to a "single anchor" universe without worrying about package limit pinning. So current users of CPFP carve out would have something else to use.
- We can switch to a cluster-based mempool [5] (#27677 #28676), which removes CPFP carve out [6].
[1]: Original mailing list post and discussion about RBF pinning problems https://gist.github.com/glozow/25d9662c52453bd08b4b4b1d3783b9ff, https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-January/019817.html
[2]: A FAQ is "we need this for cluster mempool, but is this still necessary afterwards?" There are some pinning issues that are fixed here and not fully fixed in cluster mempool, so we will still want this or something similar afterward.
[3]: Mailing list post for v3 https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-September/020937.html
[4]: Original PR #25038 also contains a lot of the discussion
[5]: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/an-overview-of-the-cluster-mempool-proposal/393/7
[6]: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/an-overview-of-the-cluster-mempool-proposal/393#the-cpfp-carveout-rule-can-no-longer-be-supported-12
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK 29029df5c700e6940c712028303761d91ae15847
achow101:
ACK 29029df5c700e6940c712028303761d91ae15847
instagibbs:
ACK 29029df5c700e6940c712028303761d91ae15847 modulo that
Tree-SHA512: 9664b078890cfdca2a146439f8835c9d9ab483f43b30af8c7cd6962f09aa557fb1ce7689d5e130a2ec142235dbc8f21213881baa75241c5881660f9008d68450
|
|
13161ecf032b7a850686e5942c12222c8f3d0d52 opt: Skip over barren combinations of tiny UTXOs (Murch)
b7672c7cdd87acb105639f475744094b53cc9891 opt: Skip checking max_weight separately (Murch)
1edd2baa37a69ff69c2eaeceaad1028f1968cbab opt: Cut if last addition was minimal weight (Murch)
5248e2a60d243b3d5c77ecd9e4c335daca399a48 opt: Skip heavier UTXOs with same effective value (Murch)
9124c73742287b06dfe6e8a94be56ace25f07b2c opt: Tiebreak UTXOs by weight for CoinGrinder (Murch)
451be19dc10381122f705bbb2127b083f1d598c6 opt: Skip evaluation of equivalent input sets (Murch)
407b1e3432b77511900b77be84d5d7450352f462 opt: Track remaining effective_value in lookahead (Murch)
5f84f3cc043c5fb15072f5072fee752eaa01a2ec opt: Skip branches with worse weight (Murch)
d68bc74fb2e3ae4ae775ab544fe5b4ab46025abb fuzz: Test optimality of CoinGrinder (Murch)
67df6c629a2e9878b06c1903e90b67087eaa3688 fuzz: Add CoinGrinder fuzz target (Murch)
1502231229dbc32c94e80a2fc2959275c5d246ef coinselection: Track whether CG completed (Murch)
7488acc64685ae16e20b78e7ad018137f27fe404 test: Add coin_grinder_tests (Murch)
6cc9a46cd0f4ed80d4523bbef1508142e0c80d27 coinselection: Add CoinGrinder algorithm (Murch)
89d09566431f57034d9a7df32547ceb13d79c62c opt: Tie-break UTXO sort by waste for BnB (Murch)
aaee65823c6e620bef5cc96d8026567e64d822fe doc: Document max_weight on BnB (Murch)
Pull request description:
***Please refer to the [topic on Delving Bitcoin](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/gutterguard-and-coingrinder-simulation-results/279) discussing Gutter Guard/Coingrinder simulation results.***
Adds a coin selection algorithm that minimizes the weight of the input set while creating change.
Motivations
---
- At high feerates, using unnecessary inputs can significantly increase the fees
- Users are upset when fees are relatively large compared to the amount sent
- Some users struggle to maintain a sufficient count of UTXOs in their wallet
Approach
---
So far, Bitcoin Core has used a balanced approach to coin selection, where it will generate multiple input set candidates using various coin selection algorithms and pick the least wasteful among their results, but not explicitly minimize the input set weight. Under some circumstances, we _do_ want to minimize the weight of the input set. Sometimes changeless solutions require many or heavy inputs, and there is not always a changeless solution for Branch and Bound to find in the first place. This can cause expensive transactions unnecessarily. Given a wallet with sufficient funds, `CoinGrinder` will pick the minimal-waste input set for a transaction with a change output. The current implementation only runs `CoinGrinder` at feerates over 3×long-term-feerate-estimate (by default 30 ṩ/vB), which may be a decent compromise between our goal to reduce costs for the users, but still permit transactions at lower feerates to naturally reduce the wallet’s UTXO pool to curb bloat.
Trade-offs
---
Simulations for my thesis on coin selection ([see Section 6.3.2.1 [PDF]](https://murch.one/erhardt2016coinselection.pdf)) suggest that minimizing the input set for all transactions tends to grind a wallet’s UTXO pool to dust (pun intended): an approach selecting inputs per coin-age-priority (in effect similar to “largest first selection”) on average produced a UTXO pool with 15× the UTXO count as Bitcoin Core’s Knapsack-based Coin Selection then (in 2016). Therefore, I do not recommend running `CoinGrinder` under all circumstances, but only at extreme feerates or when we have another good reason to minimize the input set for other reasons. In the long-term, we should introduce additional metrics to score different input set candidates, e.g. on basis of their privacy and wallet health impact, to pick from all our coin selection results, but until then, we may want to limit use of `CoinGrinder` in other ways.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 13161ecf032b7a850686e5942c12222c8f3d0d52
sr-gi:
ACK [13161ec](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27877/commits/13161ecf032b7a850686e5942c12222c8f3d0d52)
sipa:
ACK 13161ecf032b7a850686e5942c12222c8f3d0d52
Tree-SHA512: 895b08b2ebfd0b71127949b7dba27146a6d10700bf8590402b14f261e7b937f4e2e1b24ca46de440c35f19349043ed2eba4159dc2aa3edae57721384186dae40
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/ZapSelectTx/RemoveTxs/g' $(git grep -l 'ZapSelectTx' ./src/wallet)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
The goal of the function is to erase the wallet transactions that
match the inputted hashes. There is no need to traverse the database,
reading record by record, to then perform single entry removals for
each of them.
To ensure consistency and improve performance, this change-set removes
all tx records within a single atomic db batch operation, as well as
it cleans up code, improves error handling and simplifies the
transactions removal process entirely.
This optimizes the removal of watch-only transactions during the wallet
migration process and the 'removeprunedfunds' RPC command.
|
|
Given a lot of small amount UTXOs it is possible that the lookahead
indicates sufficient funds, but any combination of them would push us
beyond the current best_weight.
We can estimate a lower bound for the minimal necessary weight to reach
target from the maximal amount and minimal weight in the tail of the
UTXO pool: if adding a number of hypothetical UTXOs of this maximum
amount and minimum weight would not be able to beat `best_weight`, we
can SHIFT to the omission branch, and CUT if the last selected UTXO is
not heavier than the minimum weight of the remainder.
|
|
Initialize `best_selection_weight` as `max_weight` allows us to skip the
separate `max_weight` check on every loop.
|
|
In situations where we have UTXO groups of various weight, we can CUT
rather than SHIFT when we exceeded the max_weight or the best
selection’s weight while the last step was equal to the minimum weight
in the lookahead.
|
|
When two successive UTXOs differ in weight but match in effective value,
we can skip the second if the first is not selected, because all input
sets we can generate by swapping out a lighter UTXOs with a heavier UTXO
of matching effective value would be strictly worse.
|
|
|
|
When two successive UTXOs match in effective value and weight, we can
skip the second if the prior is not selected: adding it would create an
equivalent input set to a previously evaluated.
E.g. if we have three UTXOs with effective values {5, 3, 3} of the same
weight each, we want to evaluate
{5, _, _}, {5, 3, _}, {5, 3, 3}, {_, 3, _}, {_, 3, 3},
but skip {5, _, 3}, and {_, _, 3}, because the first 3 is not selected,
and we therefore do not need to evaluate the second 3 at the same
position in the input set.
If we reach the end of the branch, we must SHIFT the previously selected
UTXO group instead.
|
|
Introduces a dedicated data structure to track the total
effective_value available in the remaining UTXOs at each index of the
UTXO pool. In contrast to the approach in BnB, this allows us to
immediately jump to a lower index instead of visiting every UTXO to add
back their eff_value to the lookahead.
|
|
Once we exceed the weight of the current best selection, we can always
shift as adding more inputs can never yield a better solution.
|
|
Co-authored-by: Pieter Wuille <pieter@wuille.net>
|
|
|
|
CoinGrinder may not be able to exhaustively search all potentially
interesting combinations for large UTXO pools, so we keep track of
whether the search was terminated by the iteration limit.
|
|
|
|
CoinGrinder is a DFS-based coin selection algorithm that
deterministically finds the input set with the lowest weight creating a
change output.
|
|
|
|
disconnect if limit is reached, improve existing test coverage
b58f009d9585aab775998644de07e27e2a4a8045 test: check that mempool msgs lead to disconnect if uploadtarget is reached (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dd5cf38818d1e3f6cf583e2b242afd0da68b290a test: check for specific disconnect reasons in feature_maxuploadtarget.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
73d737211536de5b834f21016c5549e52de11374 test: verify `-maxuploadtarget` limit state via `getnettotals` RPC result (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR improves existing and adds new test coverage for the `-maxuploadtarget` mechanism (feature_maxuploadtarget.py) in the following ways, one commit each:
* verify the uploadtarget state via the `getnettotals` RPC (`uploadtarget` result field):
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/160d23677ad799cf9b493eaa923b2ac080c3fb8e/src/rpc/net.cpp#L581-L582
Note that reaching the total limit (`target_reached` == True) always implies that the historical blocks serving limits is also reached (`serve_historical_blocks` == False), i.e. it's impossible that both flags are set to True.
* check for peer's specific disconnect reason (in this case, `"historical block serving limit reached, disconnect peer"`):
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/160d23677ad799cf9b493eaa923b2ac080c3fb8e/src/net_processing.cpp#L2272-L2280
* add a test for a peer disconnect if the uploadtarget is reached and a `mempool` message is received (if bloom filters are enabled):
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/160d23677ad799cf9b493eaa923b2ac080c3fb8e/src/net_processing.cpp#L4755-L4763
Note that another reason for disconnect after receiving a MEMPOOL msg of a peer is if bloom filters are disabled on the node. This case is already covered in the functional test `p2p_nobloomfilter_messages.py`.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK b58f009d9585aab775998644de07e27e2a4a8045
achow101:
ACK b58f009d9585aab775998644de07e27e2a4a8045
sr-gi:
tACK [b58f009](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/b58f009d9585aab775998644de07e27e2a4a8045)
Tree-SHA512: 7439134129695c9c3a7ddc5e39f2ed700f91e7c91f0b7a9e0a783f275c6aa2f9918529cbfd38bb37f9139184e05e0f0354ef3c3df56da310177ec1d6b48b43d0
|
|
5ca9b24da18e842e7a093dc44f6b222af73e92cf test: Add makefile target for running unit tests (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
`make check` runs a bunch of other subtree tests that exercise code that is hardly ever changed and have a comparatively long runtime. There seems to be no target for running just the unit tests, so add one.
Alternatively the secp256k1 tests could be removed from the `check-local` target, reducing its runtime. This was rejected before though in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20264.
ACKs for top commit:
delta1:
utACK 5ca9b24da18e842e7a093dc44f6b222af73e92cf
edilmedeiros:
Tested ACK 5ca9b24da18e842e7a093dc44f6b222af73e92cf
achow101:
ACK 5ca9b24da18e842e7a093dc44f6b222af73e92cf
ryanofsky:
Tested ACK 5ca9b24da18e842e7a093dc44f6b222af73e92cf.
Tree-SHA512: 470969d44585d7cc33ad038a16e791db9e2be8469f52ddf122c46f20776fad34e6a48f988861a132c42540158fed05f3cf66fcc3bea05708253daaa35af54339
|
|
`rpc_setban.py --v2transport`, run it in CI
cc87ee4c3934028e78a59de509951ff7226ec80d test: fix intermittent failure in rpc_setban.py --v2transport (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This test failed for me on master locally:
The reason is that when initiating a v2 connection and being immediately disconnected, a node cannot know if the disconnect happens because the peer only supports v1, or because it has banned you, so it schedules to reconnect with v1. If the test doesn't wait for that, the reconnect can happen at a bad time, resulting in failure in a later `connect_nodes` call.
Also add the test with `--v2transport` to the test runner because banning with v2 seems like a useful thing to have test coverage for.
ACKs for top commit:
delta1:
tested ACK cc87ee4c3934028e78a59de509951ff7226ec80d
epiccurious:
Concept ACK cc87ee4c3934028e78a59de509951ff7226ec80d.
achow101:
ACK cc87ee4c3934028e78a59de509951ff7226ec80d
stratospher:
tested ACK cc87ee4. nice find!
Tree-SHA512: ae234d9b771d9c9c11501ddd93c99cf93257c999de3da62280d4d51806cd246b289c10a5f41fa7d5651b2fb4fdaee753f5b2d6939a99f89d71aa012af4a4d231
|
|
|
|
Ensure we are checking sigop-adjusted virtual size by creating setups
and packages where sigop cost is larger than bip141 vsize.
Co-authored-by: Gregory Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gregory Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
|
