Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
Start out with a single method isTestChain() that's used by the getblocktemplate RPC.
|
|
The fuzz target is generating a large amount of
transactions, but the core of the logic is
ConsumeTxMemPoolEntry making the mempool
entries for adding to the mempool. Since
ConsumeTxMemPoolEntry generates its own transaction
"vsize", we can improve efficiency of the target
by explicitly creating very small transactions,
reducing the hashing and memory burden.
|
|
|
|
See: https://github.com/miniupnp/miniupnp/commit/c0a50ce33e3b99ce8a96fd43049bb5b53ffac62f
The return value of 2 now indicates:
"A valid connected IGD has been found but its IP address is reserved (non routable)"
We continue to ignore any return value other than 1.
|
|
|
|
This reduces the size of the binary by 2-3% when building with
`--enable-reduce-exports`.
|
|
`mmacosx-version-min` for `mmacos-version-min`
7c298fe0df38696f60e981469422315c03a722da doc: rewrite some of the macdeploy docs (fanquake)
d042230f7a7ada03f85cc392b8f2c4b56e779d61 depends: swap mmacosx-version-min for mmacos-version-min (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Whilst `-mmacosx-version-min` and `-mmacos-version-min` remain aliases for each other, the later is preferred,
and I assume the former will be removed at some point in the future; see: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95374.
Somewhat of a followup to #21778. Rewrite some of the mac deploy docs.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
utACK 7c298fe0df38696f60e981469422315c03a722da
TheCharlatan:
ACK 7c298fe0df38696f60e981469422315c03a722da
hebasto:
ACK 7c298fe0df38696f60e981469422315c03a722da.
Tree-SHA512: 6493f087fde93e0eec319af0e105d163b3f047d8a03f7d4b0d6cd7c64b58d0a978b7d67c6b8dba5c6ccf8b10e188aab5dc98eec400b0546dc9ee801a689b4332
|
|
518b06c4b889d71a3fdd61f8fe38d519ea5e4a1b ci: remove unused bcc variable from workflow (Max Edwards)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30193#discussion_r1636804002
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 518b06c4b889d71a3fdd61f8fe38d519ea5e4a1b
Tree-SHA512: c87364670e26e15176ee21372a2cc100db0c275a5cffb37cc33ec4c2d85d6067b593bd4a6dea37bf478d2af197786df9dfac3cfb76db023c8db37184bb104458
|
|
gen-sdk to be deterministic"
b03a45b13e4e33b044cae6c97a6d608f6f3d43f3 Revert "contrib: macdeploy: monkey-patch gen-sdk to be deterministic" (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This reverts commit ba30a5407e065e9d6dd037351e83f56a43f38f19.
We no-longer support Python 3.8, so remove the monkey patching.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK b03a45b13e4e33b044cae6c97a6d608f6f3d43f3, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
Tree-SHA512: 5bf68c2b332f18a620a8a6f77812ed93afa988016847bec1d3b7355670301dc957442ac47191a0cb7c3fe607d902914fb00c96345c8170f2a64429638c00b3c4
|
|
|
|
|
|
94ed4fbf8e1a396c650b5134d396d6c0be35ce10 Add release note for size 2 package rbf (Greg Sanders)
afd52d8e63ed323a159ea49fd1f10542abeacb97 doc: update package RBF comment (Greg Sanders)
6e3c4394cfadf32c06c8c4732d136ca10c316721 mempool: Improve logging of replaced transactions (Greg Sanders)
d3466e4cc5051c314873dd14ec8f7a88494c0780 CheckPackageMempoolAcceptResult: Check package rbf invariants (Greg Sanders)
316d7b63c97144ba3e21201315c784852210f8ff Fuzz: pass mempool to CheckPackageMempoolAcceptResult (Greg Sanders)
4d15bcf448eb3c4451b63e8f78cc61f3f9f9b639 [test] package rbf (glozow)
dc21f61c72e5a97d974ca2c5cb70b8328f4fab2a [policy] package rbf (Suhas Daftuar)
5da396781589177d4ceb3b4b59c9f309a5e4d029 PackageV3Checks: Relax assumptions (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
Allows any 2 transaction package with no in-mempool ancestors to do package RBF when directly conflicting with other mempool clusters of size two or less.
Proposed validation steps:
1) If the transaction package is of size 1, legacy rbf rules apply.
2) Otherwise the transaction package consists of a (parent, child) pair with no other in-mempool ancestors (or descendants, obviously), so it is also going to create a cluster of size 2. If larger, fail.
3) The package rbf may not evict more than 100 transactions from the mempool(bip125 rule 5)
4) The package is a single chunk
5) Every directly conflicted mempool transaction is connected to at most 1 other in-mempool transaction (ie the cluster size of the conflict is at most 2).
6) Diagram check: We ensure that the replacement is strictly superior, improving the mempool
7) The total fee of the package, minus the total fee of what is being evicted, is at least the minrelayfee * size of the package (equivalent to bip125 rule 3 and 4)
Post-cluster mempool this will likely be expanded to general package rbf, but this is what we can safely support today.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 94ed4fbf8e1a396c650b5134d396d6c0be35ce10
glozow:
reACK 94ed4fbf8e via range-diff
ismaelsadeeq:
re-ACK 94ed4fbf8e1a396c650b5134d396d6c0be35ce10
theStack:
Code-review ACK 94ed4fbf8e1a396c650b5134d396d6c0be35ce10
murchandamus:
utACK 94ed4fbf8e1a396c650b5134d396d6c0be35ce10
Tree-SHA512: 9bd383e695964f362f147482bbf73b1e77c4d792bda2e91d7f30d74b3540a09146a5528baf86854a113005581e8c75f04737302517b7d5124296bd7a151e3992
|
|
node::Warnings and remove globals
260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81 refactor: remove warnings globals (stickies-v)
9c4b0b7ce459765fa1a63b410c3423b90f0d2a5f node: update uiInterface whenever warnings updated (stickies-v)
b071ad9770b7ae7fc718dcbfdc8f62dffbf6cfee introduce and use the generalized `node::Warnings` interface (stickies-v)
20e616f86444d00712ac7eb840666e2b0378af4a move-only: move warnings from common to node (stickies-v)
bed29c481aebeb2b0160450c63c03cc68fb89bc6 refactor: remove unnecessary AppendWarning helper function (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- moves warnings from common to the node library and into the node namespace (as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29845#discussion_r1570069541)
- generalizes the warnings interface to `Warnings::Set()` and `Warnings::Unset()` methods, instead of having a separate function and globals for each warning. As a result, this simplifies the `kernel::Notifications` interface.
- removes warnings.cpp from the kernel library
- removes warning globals
- adds testing for the warning logic
Behaviour change introduced:
- the `-alertnotify` command is executed for all `KernelNotifications::warningSet` calls, which now also covers the `LARGE_WORK_INVALID_CHAIN` warning
- the GUI is updated automatically whenever a warning is (un)set, covering some code paths where it previously wouldn't be, e.g. when `node::AbortNode()` is called, or for the `LARGE_WORK_INVALID_CHAIN` warning
Some discussion points:
- ~is `const std::string& id` the best way to refer to warnings? Enums are an obvious alternative, but since we need to define warnings across libraries, strings seem like a straightforward solution.~ _edit: updated approach to use `node::Warning` and `kernel::Warning` enums._
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81. Only change since last review was rebasing
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81
Tree-SHA512: a3fcedaee0d3ad64e9c111aeb30665162f98e0e72acd6a70b76ff2ddf4f0a34da4f97ce353c322a1668ca6ee4d8a81cc6e6d170c5bbeb7a43cffdaf66646b588
|
|
9eea51d9058ad638861aa4b94c1c6e71caeb8765 ci: move Asan / LSan / USDT job to Github Actions (Max Edwards)
4b527fa93b9763a33842069bc07446313cbf5e0f ci: add IPV6 network to ci container (Max Edwards)
Pull request description:
PR for moving the ASAN + LSAN + USDT + friends job to github actions from Cirrus.
The motivation for this PR is that this task needs a full VM (or bare metal) to function, because of the tracepoints. It can not run in a container on an arbitrary Linux, because the outside machine must exactly match the specification of the distro used in the CI task config. This requires more maintenance for the persistent worker, and I think moving to GHA will reduce the maintenance burden, or at least make it possible for anyone to work on.
Also, it makes it easier to run the task on forks (bitcoin-inquisition, bitcoin-knots, devel forks, ...) without having to set-up a real machine.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 9eea51d9058ad638861aa4b94c1c6e71caeb8765
achow101:
ACK 9eea51d9058ad638861aa4b94c1c6e71caeb8765
hebasto:
ACK 9eea51d9058ad638861aa4b94c1c6e71caeb8765.
Tree-SHA512: 1111c1c9e3a11e725dff1344643fff3c91fb9b4d7c1cc9a7d507a8f146f5223316a00272030b41ae37ecb59d044f2e90e1cd907450049b25f094f0b60643d4c7
|
|
881724d443d11f984a721ef1edd5777c24d1ed29 test: Added test coverage to listsinceblock rpc (kevkevinpal)
Pull request description:
This change is meant to add test coverage to this rpc error https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp#L666C53-L666C79
This is done by renaming the first block in the blocks folder
---
Doing a quick grep for the error code in our functional tests leads to zero results
`grep -nri "Can't read block from disk" ./test/functional/`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 881724d443d11f984a721ef1edd5777c24d1ed29
tdb3:
re ACK for 881724d443d11f984a721ef1edd5777c24d1ed29
rkrux:
tACK [881724](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30195/commits/881724d443d11f984a721ef1edd5777c24d1ed29)
Tree-SHA512: c5dff20cf014d0181f49d6b161f1364e1c6b79e8661047f77f07e21e59f4d1f2fd6f745538c8fc5bd6d4244650a840dd64d184634366f7c21fa67141a60af44a
|
|
helper for n/k > 16
5cf0a1f230389ef37e0ff65de5fc98394f32f60c test: add `createmultisig` P2MS encoding test for all n (1..20) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0570d2c204ec7f10af6bd8e48c23318a48fefc10 test: add unit test for `keys_to_multisig_script` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0c41fc3fa52ad16923afbd0ec18b9c1b3ded8036 test: fix `keys_to_multisig_script` (P2MS) helper for n/k > 16 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
While reviewing #28307, I noticed that the test framework's `key_to_multisig_script` helper (introduced in #23305) is broken for pubkey count (n) and threshold (k) values larger than 16. This is due to the implementation currently enforcing a direct single-byte data push (using `CScriptOp.encode_op_n`), which obviously fails for values 17+. Fix that by passing the numbers directly to the CScript list, where it's automatically converted to minimally-encoded pushes (see class method `CScript.__coerce_instance`, branch `isinstance(other, int)`).
The second commit adds a unit test to ensure that the encoding is correct.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5cf0a1f230389ef37e0ff65de5fc98394f32f60c
tdb3:
ACK 5cf0a1f230389ef37e0ff65de5fc98394f32f60c
rkrux:
reACK [5cf0a1f](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28312/commits/5cf0a1f230389ef37e0ff65de5fc98394f32f60c)
Tree-SHA512: 4168a165c3f483ec8e37a27dba1628a7ea0063545a2b7e74d9e20d753fddd7e33d37e1a190434fa6dca39adf9eef5d0211f7a0c1c7b44979f0a3bb350e267562
|
|
ad06e68399da71c615db0dbf5304d0cd46bc1f40 test: write functional test results to csv (tdb3)
Pull request description:
Adds argument `--resultsfile` to test_runner.py.
Enables functional test results to be written to a (csv) file for processing by other applications (or for historical archiving).
Test name, status, and duration are written to the file provided with the argument.
Since `test_runner.py` is being touched, also fixes a misspelling (linter warning). Can split into its own commit if desired.
#### Notes
- Total runtime of functional tests has seemed to have increased on my development machines over the past few months (more tests added, individual test runtime increase, etc.). Was interested in recording test runtime data over time to detect trends. Initially searched `doc/benchmarking.md`, existing PRs, and Issues, but didn't immediately see this type of capability or alternate solutions (please chime in if you know of one!). Thought it would be beneficial to add this capability to `test_runner` to facilitate this type of data analysis (and potentially other use cases)
- Saw https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/README.md#benchmarking-with-perf, and this PR's higher level data seems complimentary.
- Was on the fence as to whether to expand `print_results()` (i.e. take advantage of the same loop over `test_results`) or implement in a separate `write_results()` function. Decided on the latter for now, but interested in reviewers' thoughts.
#### Example 1: all tests pass
```
$ test/functional/test_runner.py --resultsfile functional_test_results.csv --cachedir=/mnt/tmp/cache --tmpdir=/mnt/tmp feature_blocksdir wallet_startup feature_config_args mempool_accept
Temporary test directory at /mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240614_201625
Test results will be written to functional_test_results.csv
...
$ cat functional_test_results.csv
test,status,duration(seconds)
feature_blocksdir.py,Passed,1
feature_config_args.py,Passed,29
mempool_accept.py,Passed,9
wallet_startup.py,Passed,2
ALL,Passed,29
```
#### Example 2: one test failure
```
$ cat functional_test_results.csv
test,status,duration(seconds)
feature_blocksdir.py,Passed,1
feature_config_args.py,Passed,28
wallet_startup.py,Passed,2
mempool_accept.py,Failed,1
ALL,Failed,28
```
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK ad06e68399da71c615db0dbf5304d0cd46bc1f40
kevkevinpal:
tACK [ad06e68](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30291/commits/ad06e68399da71c615db0dbf5304d0cd46bc1f40)
achow101:
ACK ad06e68399da71c615db0dbf5304d0cd46bc1f40
rkrux:
tACK [ad06e68](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30291/commits/ad06e68399da71c615db0dbf5304d0cd46bc1f40)
brunoerg:
ACK ad06e68399da71c615db0dbf5304d0cd46bc1f40
marcofleon:
Good idea, tested ACK ad06e68399da71c615db0dbf5304d0cd46bc1f40
Tree-SHA512: 561194406cc744905518aa5ac6850c07c4aaecdaf5d4d8b250671b6e90093d4fc458f050e8a85374e66359cc0e0eaceba5eb24092c55f0d8f349d744a32ef76c
|
|
Move the output serialization size and dust calculation into the loop where the
outputs are iterated over to calculate the total sum.
Move the code for adding the the txoutputs to the transaction to after
coin selection.
While this code structure generally follows a more logical flow,
the primary motivation for moving the code for adding outputs to the
transaction sets us up nicely for silent payments (in a future PR):
we need to know the input set before generating the final output scriptPubKeys.
|
|
Now that a CRecipient holds a CTxDestination, we can get the serialized
size and determine if the output is dust using the CRecipient directly.
This does not change any current behavior, but provides a nice generalization
that can be used to apply special logic to a CTxDestination serialization
and dust calculations in the future.
Specifically, in a later PR when support for `V0SilentPayment` destinations is
added, we need to use `WitnessV1Taproot` as the scriptPubKey for serialized
size calcuations whenever the `CRecipient` destination is a `V0SilentPayment`
destination.
|
|
|
|
Prior to this commit, TestEncryptedP2PState would always
send initial_v2_handshake bytes in 2 parts (as required
by early key response test).
For generalising this test and having different v2 handshake
behaviour based on the test type, special behaviours like
sending initial_v2_handshake bytes in 2 parts are executed
only if test_type is set to EARLY_KEY_RESPONSE.
|
|
Adds argument --resultsfile to test_runner.py.
Writes comma-separated functional test name, status,
and duration to the file provided with the argument.
Also fixes minor typo in test_runner.py
|
|
This change adds a test to add coverage to the rpc error that emmits the message "Can't
read block from disk"
|
|
when user specifies fee_rate
f58beabe754363cb7d5b24032fd392654b9514ac test: bumpfee with user specified fee_rate ignores walletIncrementalRelayFee (ismaelsadeeq)
436e88f4336199998184cbfa5d1c889ffaefbfb5 bumpfee: ignore WALLET_INCREMENTAL_RELAY_FEE when user specifies fee rate (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
Fixes #26973
When using the `bumpfee` RPC and manually specifying `fee_rate`, there should be no requirement that the new fee must be at least the sum of the original fee and `incrementalFee` (maximum of `relayIncrementalFee` and `WALLET_INCREMENTAL_RELAY_FEE`).
This restriction should only apply when user did not specify `fee_rate`.
> because the GUI doesn't let the user specify the new fee rate yet (https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/647), it would be very annoying to have to bump 20 times to increment by 20 sat/vbyte.
The restriction should instead be the new fee must be at least the sum of the original fee and `incrementalFee` (`relayIncrementalFee`)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f58beabe754363cb7d5b24032fd392654b9514ac
murchandamus:
ACK f58beabe754363cb7d5b24032fd392654b9514ac
Tree-SHA512: 193259f87173b7d5a8e68e0e29f2ca7e75c550e3cf0dee3d6d822b5b1e07c2e6dec0bfc8fb435855736ebced97a10dbdbfef72e8c5abde06fdefcba122f2e7f1
|
|
fae3a1f0065064d80ab4c0375a9eaeb666c5dd55 log: use error level for critical log messages (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This picks up the first commit from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29231, but extends it to also cover cases that were missed in it.
As per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#logging, LogError should be used for severe problems that require the node to shut down.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK fae3a1f0065064d80ab4c0375a9eaeb666c5dd55, I'm ~0 on the latest force push as `user_error` was already logged at the right level through `GetNotifications().fatalError(user_error);` so I'd be in favour of deduplicating/cleaning up this logging logic but can be done in follow-up.
kevkevinpal:
ACK [fae3a1f](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30255/commits/fae3a1f0065064d80ab4c0375a9eaeb666c5dd55)
achow101:
ACK fae3a1f0065064d80ab4c0375a9eaeb666c5dd55
Tree-SHA512: 3f99fd25d5a204d570a42d8fb2b450439aad7685692f9594cc813d97253c4df172a6ff3cf818959bfcf25dfcf8ee9a9c9ccc6028fcfcecdb47591e18c77ef246
|
|
Problem:
If `FuzzedSock::Recv(N, MSG_PEEK)` is called then `N` bytes would be
retrieved from the fuzz provider, saved in `m_peek_data` and returned
to the caller (ok).
If after this `FuzzedSock::Recv(M, 0)` is called where `M < N`
then the first `M` bytes from `m_peek_data` would be returned
to the caller (ok), but the remaining `N - M` bytes in `m_peek_data`
would be discarded/lost (not ok). They must be returned by a subsequent
`Recv()`.
To resolve this, only remove the head `N` bytes from `m_peek_data`.
|
|
`FuzzedSock::m_peek_data` need not be an optional of a vector.
It can be just a vector whereas an empty vector denotes "no peek data".
|
|
Allow the callers of `CreateSock()` to pass all 3 arguments to the
`socket(2)` syscall. This makes it possible to create sockets of
any domain/type/protocol.
|
|
|
|
Both of these cases appear to be harmless, but adding the tests allows us to
turn on the aggressive clang-tidy checks.
|
|
a37778d4d32b4ddeff96f68a130dc8da3a84b278 Squashed 'src/leveldb/' changes from e2f10b4e47..688561cba8 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Includes https://github.com/bitcoin-core/leveldb-subtree/pull/41 which is used in #30234.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
utACK 95812d912b6335caa7af2a084d84447fb4aad156
Tree-SHA512: 3d943695a3d33816cf5558b183f5629aa92a500a1544eecedf84952e93c8592a8cf0d554b88281fc0bad3c9e920ebcff1ed8edc12f8e73f36ed5335482beb829
|
|
e71a21b641541f4751ac1ea7fd7d33f20a629636 doc: archive release notes for v27.1 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
benalleng:
ACK for e71a21b
Tree-SHA512: a89231d09b442e5e1755135a475030648a81bb0c331eec8d9c7a27a633f64fd0449dcfe8939c0d43cc5133ad0ab85acda7de757594986f9c93fe6f90efc11a02
|
|
Somewhat of a followup to #21778.
|
|
Whilst these remain aliases for each other, the later is preferred,
and I assume the former will be removed at some point in the future;
see: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95374.
|
|
`signrawtransactionwithkey` RPC
e2779ce98b39e14cada08a654928e798436f5a46 test: cover more errors for `signrawtransactionwithkey` RPC (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following errors for the `signrawtransactionwithkey` RPC:
- Invalid private key
- TX decode failed
For reference: https://maflcko.github.io/b-c-cov/total.coverage/src/rpc/rawtransaction.cpp.gcov.html
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK e2779ce98b39e14cada08a654928e798436f5a46
kevkevinpal:
ACK [e2779ce](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30278/commits/e2779ce98b39e14cada08a654928e798436f5a46)
tdb3:
ACK e2779ce98b39e14cada08a654928e798436f5a46
BrandonOdiwuor:
Code Review ACK e2779ce98b39e14cada08a654928e798436f5a46
Tree-SHA512: 41c7e990684b60645cf4ccec8aad5ebbe61da221871eb3c1685b2bb1eebda58b29358502cb1525b7c7a2b612e2bebf449ed0bae14ab663b4641c528a9c013b5b
|
|
bech32 encoding
07f64177a49f1b6b4d486d10cf67fddfa3c995eb Reduce memory copying operations in bech32 encode (Lőrinc)
d5ece3c4b5e109f65f5d3315c43239dd87bb2c81 Reserve hrp memory in Decode and LocateErrors (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
Started optimizing the base conversions in [TryParseHex](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29458), [Base58](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29473) and [IsSpace](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29602) - this is the next step.
Part of this change was already merged in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30047, which made decoding `~26%` faster.
Here I've reduced the memory reallocations and copying operations in bech32 encode, making it `~15%` faster.
> make && ./src/bench/bench_bitcoin --filter='Bech32Encode' --min-time=1000
Before:
```
| ns/byte | byte/s | err% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 19.97 | 50,074,562.72 | 0.1% | 1.06 | `Bech32Encode`
```
After:
```
| ns/byte | byte/s | err% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 17.33 | 57,687,668.20 | 0.1% | 1.10 | `Bech32Encode`
```
ACKs for top commit:
josibake:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29607/commits/07f64177a49f1b6b4d486d10cf67fddfa3c995eb
sipa:
utACK 07f64177a49f1b6b4d486d10cf67fddfa3c995eb
achow101:
ACK 07f64177a49f1b6b4d486d10cf67fddfa3c995eb
Tree-SHA512: 511885217d044ad7ef2bdf9203b8e0b94eec8b279bc193bb7e63e29ab868df6d21e9e4c7a24390358e1f9c131447ee42039df72edcf1e2b11e1856eb2b3e10dd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support package RBF where the conflicting package would result
in a mempool cluster of size two, and each of its direct
conflicts are also part of an up-to-size-2 mempool cluster.
This restricted topology allows for exact calculation
of miner scores for each side of the equation, reducing
the surface area for new pins, or incentive-incompatible
replacements.
This allows wallets to create simple CPFP packages
that can fee bump other simple CPFP packages. This,
leveraged with other restrictions such as V3 transactions,
can create pin-resistant applications.
Future package RBF relaxations can be considered when appropriate.
Co-authored-by: glozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
|
|
This reverts commit ba30a5407e065e9d6dd037351e83f56a43f38f19.
|
|
|
|
688561cba8 Merge bitcoin-core/leveldb-subtree#41: Ignore clang's self-assignment check
7045a90ed7 Ignore clang's self-assignment check
git-subtree-dir: src/leveldb
git-subtree-split: 688561cba8746482893f835c4829e4eb4a5b7615
|
|
eb37a9b8e79f9e49d73b96a49bf97a96d9eb676c
cb59af38e72ab189b052ec84e2d1027473235ba4 Squashed 'src/minisketch/' changes from 3472e2f5ec..eb37a9b8e7 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Includes https://github.com/sipa/minisketch/pull/87 which is used in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30234.
Includes https://github.com/sipa/minisketch/pull/88 which is used in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29876.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 89464ad59cf11f68315ea3104236989e5b429d15
theuni:
utACK 89464ad59cf11f68315ea3104236989e5b429d15
Tree-SHA512: 838a8c60856bfdf714da7d5d97e31d458290849ba5007d5c5bb7abb83d413ada6b4c16e45b0e060ff892b5785e6b664be9b6a666d04f0a414b0e359d64d3ad44
|
|
|
|
This commit introduces slight behaviour change. Previously, the
GUI status bar would be updated for most warnings, namely
UNKNOWN_NEW_RULES_ACTIVATED, CLOCK_OUT_OF_SYNC and
PRE_RELEASE_TEST_BUILD, but not for LARGE_WORK_INVALID_CHAIN
(and not for FATAL_INTERNAL_ERROR, but that is not really
meaningful).
Fix this by always updating the status bar when the warnings are
changed.
|