aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-11-01doc: Add output script descriptors BIPs 380..386Hennadii Stepanov
2021-11-01Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23403: test: Fix segfault in the ↵MarcoFalke
psbt_wallet_tests/psbt_updater_test 68018e4c3e76f7e5bebf5f90ffd972c7bf01e0a0 test: Avoid excessive locking of `cs_wallet` (Hennadii Stepanov) 7986faf2e09ea85b1d4564ce910f07a4c4de8685 test: Fix segfault in the psbt_wallet_tests/psbt_updater_test (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: The dcd6eeb64adb2b532f5003cbb86ba65b3c08a87b commit (bitcoin/bitcoin#23288) introduced an intermittent failure in the `psbt_wallet_tests/psbt_updater_test` unit test. See bitcoin/bitcoin#23368. The test failure can be easily made reproducible with the following patch: ```diff --- a/src/scheduler.cpp +++ b/src/scheduler.cpp @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ void CScheduler::serviceQueue() Function f = taskQueue.begin()->second; taskQueue.erase(taskQueue.begin()); + UninterruptibleSleep(100ms); + { // Unlock before calling f, so it can reschedule itself or another task // without deadlocking: ``` This PR implements an idea which was mentioned in the [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23368#issuecomment-953796339): > Yes, as I said before this looks like a race where the wallet is deleted before stopping the scheduler: [#23368 (comment)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23368#issuecomment-952808824) > > IIRC, the order should be: > > * stop scheduler > > * delete wallet > > * delete scheduler The second commit introduces a refactoring with no behavior change. Fixes bitcoin/bitcoin#23368. ACKs for top commit: mjdietzx: Code review ACK 68018e4c3e76f7e5bebf5f90ffd972c7bf01e0a0 Tree-SHA512: d9103f6252aab807453628159dec243bc543a2595eecaa04ec761dca3c2370085592c55d6f50967d69a4ac6e8b5827eec30dd9b025132c99b0bb9aa5911ad915
2021-11-01Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22766: refactor: Clarify and disable unused ↵fanquake
ArgsManager flags c5d7e34bd9a4ad752c5ec88032420e2e90ab17ab scripted-diff: disable unimplemented ArgsManager BOOL/INT/STRING flags (Russell Yanofsky) b8c069b7a952e326d2d974cc671889d1a3b38aa4 refactor: Add explicit DISALLOW_NEGATION ArgsManager flag to clarify flag usage (Russell Yanofsky) 26a50ab322614bceb5bc62e2c282f83e5987bad8 refactor: Split InterpretOption into Interpret{Key,Value} functions (Russell Yanofsky) Pull request description: This is preparation for #16545 or another PR implementing type validation for ArgsManager settings. It fixes misleading usages of existing flags, prevents flags from being similarly misused in the future, and allows validation logic to be added without breaking backwards compatibility. --- Currently, ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags don't do any real validation, so current uses of these flags are misleading and will also break backwards compatibility whenever these flags are implemented in a future PR (draft PR is #16545). An additional complication is that while these flags don't do any real settings validation, they do affect whether setting negation syntax is allowed. Fix this mess by disabling ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags until they are implemented, and adding an unambiguous DISALLOW_NEGATION flag. This is done in three commits, with the first commit cleaning up some code, the second commit adding the DISALLOW_NEGATION flag, and the next commit disabling the ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags. None of the changes affect behavior in any way. ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: utACK c5d7e34bd9a4ad752c5ec88032420e2e90ab17ab promag: Code review ACK c5d7e34bd9a4ad752c5ec88032420e2e90ab17ab, which as the new argument `-legacy`. Tree-SHA512: cad0e06361e8cc584eb07b0a1f8b469e3beea18abb458c4e43d9d16e9f301b12ebf1d1d426a407fbd96f99724ad6c0eae5be05c713881da7c55e0e08044674eb
2021-11-01Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23380: addrman: Fix AddrMan::Add() return semantics ↵fanquake
and logging 61ec0539b26a902a41a2602187a71f9dba3c6935 [MOVEONLY] reorder functions in addrman_impl.h and addrman.cpp (John Newbery) 2095df7b7bfcb9ab0c5710a93112f7f341e753c9 [addrman] Add Add_() inner function, fix Add() return semantics (John Newbery) 2658eb6d68460272deefb3fcc653b03f6ec6e7cf [addrman] Rename Add_() to AddSingle() (John Newbery) e58598e833d5737900fe3c4369e26f2a08166892 [addrman] Add doxygen comment to AddrMan::Add() (John Newbery) Pull request description: Previously, Add() would return true if the function created a new AddressInfo object, even if that object could not be successfully entered into the new table and was deleted. That would happen if the new table position was already taken and the existing entry could not be removed. Instead, return true if the new AddressInfo object is successfully entered into the new table. This fixes a bug in the "Added %i addresses" log, which would not always accurately log how many addresses had been added. ACKs for top commit: naumenkogs: ACK 61ec0539b26a902a41a2602187a71f9dba3c6935 mzumsande: ACK 61ec0539b26a902a41a2602187a71f9dba3c6935 shaavan: ACK 61ec0539b26a902a41a2602187a71f9dba3c6935 Tree-SHA512: 276f1e8297d4b6d411d05d06ffc7c176f6290a784da039926ab6c471a8ed8e9159ab4f56c893b1285737ae292954930f0d28012d89dfb3f2f825d7df41016feb
2021-10-31test: Avoid excessive locking of `cs_wallet`Hennadii Stepanov
2021-10-31test: Fix segfault in the psbt_wallet_tests/psbt_updater_testHennadii Stepanov
The bug was introduced in dcd6eeb64adb2b532f5003cbb86ba65b3c08a87b.
2021-10-30Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23385: refactor: get wallet path relative to wallet_dirfanquake
9ba7c44265a47880585e39d0167d057ba935ff16 refactor: get wallet path relative to wallet_dir (Michael Dietz) Pull request description: Now that boost has been updated > 1.60 (see #22320), we can simplify how we get wallet path relative to wallet_dir by using: `boost::filesystem::lexically_relative`, removing a TODO. Test coverage comes from `test/functional/wallet_multiwallet.py` I first tried this in #20265 which was my first attempted PR, and funny enough exactly 1 year later I'm opening this one to hopefully finally close this. ACKs for top commit: ryanofsky: Code review ACK 9ba7c44265a47880585e39d0167d057ba935ff16. Basically this same code change is made in #20744 commit b70c84348ac7a8e427a1183f894c73e52c734529, so this PR helps simplify that one lsilva01: Code Review ACK 9ba7c44 Tree-SHA512: 6ccb91a18bcb52c3ae0c789a94a18fb5be7db7769fd1121552d63f259fbd32b50c3dcf169cec0b02f978321db3bc60eb4b881b8327e9764f32e700236e0d8a35
2021-10-29refactor: get wallet path relative to wallet_dirMichael Dietz
Now that boost has been updated > 1.60, we can simplify how we get wallet path relative to wallet_dir by using: `boost::filesystem::lexically_relative`
2021-10-29Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23354: Introduce new V4 format addrmanMarcoFalke
d891ae768185b464cae476c16c74c365372d4a3c Introduce new V4 format addrman (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: #23306 effectively changed the on-disk format in an incompatible way: old deserializers cannot deal with multiple entries for the same IP. Introduce a `V4_MULTIPORT` format, and increment the compatibility base, so that old versions correctly recognize it as an incompatible future version, rather than corruption. ACKs for top commit: naumenkogs: ACK d891ae768185b464cae476c16c74c365372d4a3c ajtowns: utACK d891ae768185b464cae476c16c74c365372d4a3c vasild: ACK d891ae768185b464cae476c16c74c365372d4a3c Tree-SHA512: de2153beb59152504ee0656dd0cc0b879b09136eb07e3ce0426d2fea778adfabacebbce5cf1a9a65dc99ad4e99cda42ab26743fe672fb82a9fbfec49c4cccb4d
2021-10-29Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23375: test: MiniWallet: more deterministic coin ↵MarcoFalke
selection for coinbase UTXOs (oldest first) d2c4904ef707e2023ceb8dfbfe61a92c4060e100 test: MiniWallet: more deterministic coin selection for coinbase UTXOs (oldest first) (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: The coin selection strategy for MiniWallet is quite straight-forward: simply pick a single UTXO with the largest value: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/ab25ef8c7f767258d5fe44f53b35ad8bd51ed5cd/test/functional/test_framework/wallet.py#L173-L174 If there are several candidates with the same value, however, it is not clear which one is taken. This can be particularly problematic for coinbase outputs with fixed block subsidy, since spending could lead to a `bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase` reject if an UTXO from a too-recent block is picked. Introduce block height as second criteria (saved in `self._utxos` in the methods `generate(...)` and `rescan_utxos(...)`), in order to avoid potential issues with coinbases that are not matured yet. If there is a tie between coinbase UTXOs and non-coinbase UTXOs (the latter are added via `scan_tx(...)`), prefer the non-coinbase UTXOs, since those don't need to mature. The issue came up while refactoring the test rpc_blockchain.py, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23371#discussion_r737401936 (PR #23371). ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK d2c4904ef707e2023ceb8dfbfe61a92c4060e100 shaavan: ACK d2c4904ef707e2023ceb8dfbfe61a92c4060e100 Tree-SHA512: 15d67b42fb8b77fd53022ea2ab8a6ed2b615567f3ce73bab16c06bfcb687c1a04dcb0360d0c2287c526b604cd3ac5eef7b14ce46fc31e23047ce1a3290027306
2021-10-29Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22972: test: fix misleading fee unit in mempool_limit.pyMarcoFalke
2600db6c36c11bf49a0a113ee2e2274406ade61c test: fix misleading fee unit in mempool_limit.py (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: The PR is a follow-up to #22543. The helper `send_large_txs` in its current interface has a fee_rate parameter, implying that it would create a transaction with exactly that rate. Unfortunately, this fee rate is only passed to MiniWallet's `create_self_transfer` method, which can't know that we append several tx outputs after, increasing the tx's vsize and decreasing it's fee rate accordingly. In our case, the fee rate is off by several orders of magnitude, as the tx's vsize changes changes from 96 to 67552 vbytes (>700x), i.e. the value passed to this function is neither really a fee rate nor an absolute fee, but something in-between, which is very confusing. It was suggested to simply in-line this helper as it's currently only used in this single test (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22543#discussion_r701685136, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22543#issuecomment-918986896), but I could imagine that this helper may also become useful for other tests and may be moved to a library (e.g. wallet.py) in the future. Clarify the interface by passing an absolute fee that is deducted in the end (and also verified, via testmempoolaccept) and also describe how we come up with the value passed. On master, the comment says that the fee rate needs to increased "massively"; this word is also removed because the fee rate only needs to be higher for the test to succeed. ACKs for top commit: stratospher: ACK 2600db6. Tree-SHA512: 0bfacc3fa87603970d86c1d0186e51511f6c20c64b0559e19e7e12a68647f79dcb4f436000dee718fd832ce6a68e3bbacacb29145e0287811f1cb03d2f316843
2021-10-29Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22787: refactor: actual immutable pointingMarcoFalke
54011e7aa274bdc1b921440cc8b4623aa1e0d89e refactor: use CWallet const shared pointers when possible (Karl-Johan Alm) 96461989a2de737151bc4fb216221bf49cb53ce6 refactor: const shared_ptrs (Karl-Johan Alm) Pull request description: ```C++ const std::shared_ptr<CWallet> wallet = x; ``` means we can not do `wallet = y`, but we can totally do `wallet->DestructiveOperation()`, contrary to what that line looks like. This PR * introduces a new convention: always use const shared pointers to `CWallet`s (even when we mutate the pointed-to thing) * uses `const shared_ptr<const CWallet>` everywhere where wallets are not modified In the future, this should preferably apply to all shared pointers, not limited to just `CWallet`s. Both of these serve the same purpose: to dispell the misconception that `const shared_ptr<X>` immutates `X`. It doesn't, and it's dangerous to leave this misconception as is, for obvious reasons. ACKs for top commit: theStack: re-ACK 54011e7aa274bdc1b921440cc8b4623aa1e0d89e Tree-SHA512: 3bf4062fc821751be30770c6b4ead10a016847970f155a0a5156f304347d221b9830840030c2fbfba8cd1e282f4eda45f5b4107fe6df8138afdcb6c2e95a2836
2021-10-28[MOVEONLY] reorder functions in addrman_impl.h and addrman.cppJohn Newbery
Keep the internal {Function}_() functions grouped together. Review with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
2021-10-28[addrman] Add Add_() inner function, fix Add() return semanticsJohn Newbery
Previously, Add() would return true if the function created a new AddressInfo object, even if that object could not be successfully entered into the new table and was deleted. That would happen if the new table position was already taken and the existing entry could not be removed. Instead, return true if the new AddressInfo object is successfully entered into the new table. This fixes a bug in the "Added %i addresses" log, which would not always accurately log how many addresses had been added. p2p_addrv2_relay.py and p2p_addr_relay.py need to be updated since they were incorrectly asserting on the buggy log (assuming that addresses are added to addrman, when there could in fact be new table position collisions that prevent some of those address records from being added).
2021-10-28[addrman] Rename Add_() to AddSingle()John Newbery
2021-10-28[addrman] Add doxygen comment to AddrMan::Add()John Newbery
Does not document the return value since we're going to fix the semantics in a future commit.
2021-10-27test: MiniWallet: more deterministic coin selection for coinbase UTXOs ↵Sebastian Falbesoner
(oldest first) The coin selection strategy for MiniWallet is quite straight-forward: simply pick a single UTXO with the largest value: self._utxos = sorted(self._utxos, key=lambda k: k['value']) utxo_to_spend = utxo_to_spend or self._utxos.pop() If there are several candidates with the same value, however, it is not clear which one is taken. This can be particularly problematic for coinbase outputs with fixed block subsidy, since spending could lead to a 'bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase' reject if an UTXO from a too-recent block is picked. Introduce block height as second criteria (saved in self._utxos in the methods generate(...) and rescan_utxos(...)), in order to avoid potential issues with coinbases that are not matured yet.
2021-10-27Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23305: test: refactor: add `script_util` helper for ↵MarcoFalke
creating bare multisig scripts 4718897ce3a7c728ff7aebbadabcc8ed7a0b8d6e test: add script_util helper for creating bare multisig scripts (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This PR is a follow-up to #22363 and #23118 and introduces a helper `keys_to_multisig_script` for creating bare multisig outputs in the form of ``` OP_K PubKey1 PubKey2 ... PubKeyN OP_N OP_CHECKMULTISIG ``` The function takes a list of pubkeys (both hex- and byte-strings are accepted due to the `script_util.check_key` helper being used internally) and optionally a threshold _k_. If no threshold is passed, a n-of-n multisig output is created, with _n_ being the number of passed pubkeys. ACKs for top commit: shaavan: utACK 4718897ce3a7c728ff7aebbadabcc8ed7a0b8d6e rajarshimaitra: tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23305/commits/4718897ce3a7c728ff7aebbadabcc8ed7a0b8d6e Tree-SHA512: b452d8a75b0d17316b66ac4ed4c6893fe59c7c417719931d4cd3955161f59afca43503cd09b83a35b5a252a122eb3f0fbb9da9f0e7c944cf8da572a02219ed9d
2021-10-26Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23006: multiprocess: Add new bitcoin-gui, bitcoin-qt, ↵MarcoFalke
bitcoin-wallet init implementations d5f985e51f2863fda0c0d632e836eba42a5c3e15 multiprocess: Add new bitcoin-gui, bitcoin-qt, bitcoin-wallet init implementations (Russell Yanofsky) Pull request description: Add separate `interfaces::Init` subclasses for `bitcoin-wallet`, `bitcoin-gui`, and `bitcoin-qt` binaries instead of sharing `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-node` init subclasses in different binaries. After this, the new init subclasses can be customized in #10102, so node and wallet code is dropped from the `bitcoin-gui` binary and wallet code is dropped from into the `bitcoin-node` binary. --- This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). ACKs for top commit: lsilva01: reACK d5f985e hebasto: re-ACK d5f985e51f2863fda0c0d632e836eba42a5c3e15, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23006#pullrequestreview-787537444) review. Tree-SHA512: 6784210bd9ce3a6fbc66852680d0e9bc513c072dc538aeb7f48cb6a41580d3f567ccef04f975ee767a714a4b05d4d87273e94a79abda1b9c25d5ac4bbe752006
2021-10-26test: add script_util helper for creating bare multisig scriptsSebastian Falbesoner
2021-10-26Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23332: doc: Fix CWalletTx::Confirmation docMarcoFalke
fa8fef6ef2287cd36ae14fbf10e852ddef7e62ac doc: Fix CWalletTx::Confirmation doc (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Follow-up to: * commit 700c42b85d20e624bef4228eef062c93084efab5, which replaced pIndex with block_hash in AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe. * commit 9700fcb47feca9d78e005b8d18b41148c8f6b25f, which replaced posInBlock with confirm.nIndex. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK fa8fef6ef2287cd36ae14fbf10e852ddef7e62ac ryanofsky: Code review ACK fa8fef6ef2287cd36ae14fbf10e852ddef7e62ac Tree-SHA512: e7643b8e9200b8ebab3eda30435ad77006568a03476006013c9ac42c826c84e42e29bcdefc6f443fe4d55e76e903bfed5aa7a51f831665001c204634b6f06508
2021-10-25Introduce new V4 format addrmanPieter Wuille
92617b7a758c0425330fba4b886296730567927c effectively changed the on-disk format in an incompatible way: old deserializers cannot deal with multiple entries for the same IP. Introduce a V4_MULTIPORT format, and increment the compatibility base, so that old versions correctly recognize it as an incompatible future version.
2021-10-25scripted-diff: disable unimplemented ArgsManager BOOL/INT/STRING flagsRussell Yanofsky
This commit does not change behavior in any way. See previous commit for complete rationale, but these flags are being disabled because they aren't implemented and will otherwise break backwards compatibility when they are implemented. -BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i 's:\(ALLOW_.*\) \(//!< unimplemented\):// \1\2:' src/util/system.h sed -i '/DISALLOW_NEGATION.*scripted-diff/d' src/util/system.cpp git grep -l 'ArgsManager::ALLOW_\(INT\|STRING\)' | xargs sed -i 's/ArgsManager::ALLOW_\(INT\|STRING\)/ArgsManager::ALLOW_ANY | ArgsManager::DISALLOW_NEGATION/g' git grep -l 'ALLOW_BOOL' -- ':!src/util/system.h' | xargs sed -i 's/ALLOW_BOOL/ALLOW_ANY/g' -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2021-10-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23306: Make AddrMan support multiple ports per IPMarcoFalke
92617b7a758c0425330fba4b886296730567927c Make AddrMan support multiple ports per IP (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: For a long part of Bitcoin's history, this codebase has aggressively avoided making automatic connections to anything but nodes running on port 8333. I'd like to propose changing that, and this is a first PR necessary for that. The folklore justification (eventually actually added as a comment to the codebase in #20668) is that this is to prevent the Bitcoin P2P network from being leveraged to perform a DoS attack on other services, if their IP/port would get rumoured. It appears, at least the current network scale - and probably significantly larger - that the impact is very low at best (see calculations by vasild in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/5150#issuecomment-853888909 e.g.). Another possible justification would be a risk that treating different IP:port combinations separately would help perform Eclipse attacks (by an attacker rumouring their own IP with many ports). This concern is (a) no different than what is possible with IPv6 (where large ranges of IP addresses are very cheaply available), and (b) already hopefully sufficiently addressed by addrman's design (which limits access through based selected based on network groups). And this policy has downsides too; in particular, a fixed port is easy to detect, and a very obvious sign a Bitcoin node is running there. One obstacle in moving away from a default port that is the fact that addrman is currently restricted to a single entry per IP address. If ports are no longer expected to be generally always the default one, we need to deal with the case where conflicting information is relayed. It turns out there is a very natural solution to this: treat (IP,port) combination exactly as we're treating IPs now; this automatically means that the same IP may appear with multiple ports, simply because those would be distinct entries. Given that indexing into addrman's bucket _already_ uses the port number, the only change required is making all addrman lookup be (IP,port) (aka `CService`) based, rather than IP (aka `CNetAddr`) based. This PR doesn't include any change to the actual outbound connection preference logic, as perhaps that's something that we want to phase in more gradually. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: Code review ACK 92617b7a758c0425330fba4b886296730567927c naumenkogs: ACK 92617b7a758c0425330fba4b886296730567927c ajtowns: ACK 92617b7a758c0425330fba4b886296730567927c vasild: ACK 92617b7a758c0425330fba4b886296730567927c Tree-SHA512: 9eef06ce97a8b54a3f05fb8acf6941f253a9a5e0be8ce383dd05c44bb567cea243b74ee5667178e7497f6df2db93adab97ac66edbc37c883fd8ec840ee69a33f
2021-10-25refactor: Add explicit DISALLOW_NEGATION ArgsManager flag to clarify flag usageRussell Yanofsky
Currently, ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags don't do any real validation, so current uses of these flags are misleading and will also break backwards compatibility whenever these flags are implemented in a future PR (draft PR is #16545). An additional complication is that while these flags don't do any real settings validation, they do affect whether setting negation syntax is allowed. Fix this mess by disabling ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags until they are implemented, and adding an unambiguous DISALLOW_NEGATION flag. This is done in two commits, with this commit adding the DISALLOW_NEGATION flag, and the next commit disabling the ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags.
2021-10-25refactor: Split InterpretOption into Interpret{Key,Value} functionsRussell Yanofsky
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
2021-10-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23312: tests: reduce feature_segwit.py usage of the ↵MarcoFalke
legacy wallet e9ade032f3283971025943d750b1305bc8da56fc tests: Add feature_segwit.py --descriptors to test_runner.py (Andrew Chow) ae6cbcc90926b65099ed8747e7a13a4aefba787a tests: restrict feature_segwit legacy wallet import tests (Andrew Chow) 1d13c44a4cb02b0acef6c6a108410cfc7eb20f71 tests: Use descriptors for feature_segwit multisig setup (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: `feature_segwit.py` has tests for some legacy wallet behavior, but otherwise does not really need the legacy wallet. Those parts now require `--legacy-wallet` to be provided (as with other legacy wallet tests). Other parts of the test are changed to work with descriptor wallets as well. ACKs for top commit: lsilva01: tACK e9ade03 Tree-SHA512: 4ae76a4d2a8d318e7f8ad4c984748e3cdd67ed00359fcd798a08492ed9399b1d01be88c9ebea3d6c996fbe190cf41708a15c98f088f0cb5c47d6d00fff258944
2021-10-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23311: wallet: Use PACKAGE_NAME to mention our softwareMarcoFalke
da791c7f66243080177f92ce5f38c49305da63dc wallet: Use PACKAGE_NAME to mention our software (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: This PR replaces "bitcoin" and "bitcoind" with `PACKAGE_NAME` in wallet log and error messages. ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK da791c7f66243080177f92ce5f38c49305da63dc lsilva01: Tested ACK da791c7 on Ubuntu 20.04. brunoerg: tACK da791c7f66243080177f92ce5f38c49305da63dc stratospher: Tested ACK da791c7 shaavan: ACK da791c7f66243080177f92ce5f38c49305da63dc Tree-SHA512: c613446d9c8c3f85e6f5fec77382c9bc17746a853c89e72e1a3a79bf355d7bd9e455bbde8f9e02a894d225a67029c732cdc68ec8c58ac8237dde27d39dae8be7
2021-10-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23157: txmempool -/-> validation 1/2: improve ↵MarcoFalke
performance of check() and remove dependency on validation 082c5bf099c64e3d27abe9b68a71ce500b693e7e [refactor] pass coinsview and height to check() (glozow) ed6115f1eae0eb4669601106a9aaff078a2f3a74 [mempool] simplify some check() logic (glozow) 9e8d7ad5d9cc4b013826daead9cee09aad539401 [validation/mempool] use Spend/AddCoin instead of UpdateCoins (glozow) 09d18916afb0ecae90700d4befd9d5dc52767970 MOVEONLY: remove single-use helper func CheckInputsAndUpdateCoins (glozow) e8639ec26aaf4de3fae280963434bf1cf2017b6f [mempool] remove now-unnecessary code (glozow) 54c6f3c1da01090aee9691a2c2bee0984a054ce8 [mempool] speed up check() by using coins cache and iterating in topo order (glozow) 30e240f65e69c6dffcd033afc63895345bd51f53 [bench] Benchmark CTxMemPool::check() (glozow) cb1407196fba648aa75504e3ab3d46aa0181563a [refactor/bench] make mempool_stress bench reusable and parameterizable (glozow) Pull request description: Remove the txmempool <-> validation circular dependency by removing txmempool's dependency on validation. There are two functions in txmempool that need validation right now: `check()` and `removeForReorg()`. This PR removes the dependencies in `check()`. This PR also improves the performance of `CTxMemPool::check()` by walking through the entries exactly once, in ascending ancestorcount order, which guarantees that we see parents before children. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: reACK 082c5bf099c64e3d27abe9b68a71ce500b693e7e GeneFerneau: tACK [082c5bf](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23157/commits/082c5bf099c64e3d27abe9b68a71ce500b693e7e) rajarshimaitra: tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23157/commits/082c5bf099c64e3d27abe9b68a71ce500b693e7e theStack: Code-review ACK 082c5bf099c64e3d27abe9b68a71ce500b693e7e Tree-SHA512: 40ac622af1627b5c3e6abb4f0f035d833265a8c5e8dc88faf5354875dfb5137f137825e54bbd2a2668ed37b145c5d02285f776402629f58596e51853a9a79d29
2021-10-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22711: test: check for specific block reject reasons ↵MarcoFalke
in p2p_segwit.py 45827fd718d51acffdbeb3bb12d1eb96e3fa8bc0 test: check for block reject reasons in p2p_segwit.py [2/2] (Sebastian Falbesoner) 4eb532ff8b5ea9338e6cb1b927abaa43f8e3c94e test: check for block reject reasons in p2p_segwit.py [1/2] (Sebastian Falbesoner) b1488c4dcecb9dda9d7c583c1c9e1bc0852c79b2 test: fix reference to block processing test in p2p_segwit.py (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: In the test `p2p_segwit.py`, there are many instances where we send a segwit block to a node with the expectation that it is rejected. For this purpose, the helper function `test_witness_block` exists which allows also to check for a specific reject `reason` that is asserted in the debug log: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/502d22ceed1f90ed41336260f8eb428d3acaf514/test/functional/p2p_segwit.py#L119-L120 This PR aims to increase the precision of the tests by adding the expected reject reasons to all `test_witness_block` call instances (found via `grep`ing after `test_witness_block(.*accepted=False`). For some blocks that are rejected due to failed script verification, the exact reason is only shown in the debug log if parallel script verification is disabled. For this reason, the addition of the reasons is split up in two commits: * first, all instances are tackled that are not subject to script verification, i.e. it doesn't matter whether parallel script verification is enabled or not (e.g. `bad-blk-weight`, `bad-witness-merkle-match`...) * then, we explicitely set `-par=1` to only use one script thread, and add the remaining reasons (`non-mandatory-script-verify-flag` with the more specific reason in parantheses) ACKs for top commit: stratospher: tested ACK 45827fd. Tree-SHA512: 00f31867f11d48b38a42b1e79a1303bda1c797ccf3d8c73e6107d70b062604d51ee2a3f2251e7f068dfafdaf09469d27dfee438d9bc9ebaef7febc4b6ef90a95
2021-10-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23338: tests: speed up coinselector_testsMarcoFalke
a52f1d13409e4ef46277596ec13fa8b421fa1329 walletdb: Use SQLiteDatabase for mock wallet databases (Andrew Chow) a78c2298080f173d0266e708267458a72eb2f600 tests: Place into mapWallet in coinselector_tests (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: #23288 changed coinselector_tests to use `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan`, but it also ended up significantly slowing down the test, from 4 seconds to over 1 minute. It appears that the source of this slow down is with `CWallet::AddToWallet`, and primarily due to writing data to the mock wallet database. Because the only thing that is actually needed is for the created transaction to be placed into `CWallet::mapWallet`, this PR removes the call to `AddToWallet` and just places the transaction into `mapWallet` directly. This reduces the test time to 5 seconds. To speed things up further, `CreateMockWalletDatabase` is changed to make a `SQLiteDatabase` instead of a `BerkeleyDatabase`. This is safe because there are no tests that require a specific mock database type. ACKs for top commit: brunoerg: tACK a52f1d13409e4ef46277596ec13fa8b421fa1329 lsilva01: tACK a52f1d1. Performed 74.36% better on Ubuntu 20.04 (VM, 12 MB, 8vCPU). glozow: utACK a52f1d13409e4ef46277596ec13fa8b421fa1329 Tree-SHA512: da77936bfd2e816d2e71703567b9389d0ee79f3a4a690802ffe3469df5bed371b296cb822b897f625654dab9436d91fd6bc02364a518a47d746e487d70a72595
2021-10-25refactor: use CWallet const shared pointers when possibleKarl-Johan Alm
While const shared_ptr<X> gives us an immutable shared pointer to a mutable X (we can't set it to some other X later), shared_ptr<const X> gives us a shared pointer to an immutable X. Importantly, we can recast shared_ptr<X> into shared_ptr<const X>, but not the other way around. We do this for two reasons: because it makes the code safer to guarantee the wallet is not modified, and because it further dispells the misconception that const shared_ptr<X> gives immutability to X.
2021-10-25refactor: const shared_ptrsKarl-Johan Alm
Introduce convention to use const shared pointers everywhere, unless the shared pointer is modified at some point, which it very rarely is. We want this convention, as it helps alleviate the misconception that a const shared pointer somehow results in a pointer to an immutable object, which is false.
2021-10-23Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23215: ci: Add vcpkg tools cachefanquake
f778845d972578e7abdced64ec6129d809c816f6 ci: Add vcpkg tools cache (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: On master (02feae54a53ff654f7cecf17ed467edcd612cd0c) vcpkg downloads some tools that are used internally: ``` ... A suitable version of cmake was not found (required v3.20.0). Downloading portable cmake v3.20.0... Downloading cmake... https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/releases/download/v3.20.2/cmake-3.20.2-windows-i386.zip -> C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Temp\vcpkg\downloads\cmake-3.20.2-windows-i386.zip Extracting cmake... A suitable version of 7zip was not found (required v18.1.0). Downloading portable 7zip v18.1.0... Downloading 7zip... https://www.nuget.org/api/v2/package/7-Zip.CommandLine/18.1.0 -> C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Temp\vcpkg\downloads\7-zip.commandline.18.1.0.nupkg Extracting 7zip... A suitable version of nuget was not found (required v5.5.0). Downloading portable nuget v5.5.0... Downloading nuget... https://dist.nuget.org/win-x86-commandline/v5.5.1/nuget.exe -> C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Temp\vcpkg\downloads\22ea847d-nuget.exe Detecting compiler hash for triplet x64-windows-static... A suitable version of powershell-core was not found (required v7.1.0). Downloading portable powershell-core v7.1.0... Downloading powershell-core... https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/releases/download/v7.1.3/PowerShell-7.1.3-win-x86.zip -> C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Temp\vcpkg\downloads\PowerShell-7.1.3-win-x86.zip Extracting powershell-core... ... ``` If any of downloads above fails the whole CI task fails (see #23107). The most recent failure examples in the master branch: - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/c001da306b29c46ef1e7421002c3aba3ff5ed514, [log](https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/task/5182966176415744/logs/build.log) - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/12ff8993bcc7315f4a9b69bf16def980bb0e5197, [log](https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/task/5367684129882112/logs/build.log) This PR adds vcpkg tools cache. Closes #23107. --- Note for reviewers. Some patches from the initial PR were split into separated PRs: #23310 and #23329. Therefore, a discussion here could be outdated or irrelevant until the recent [push](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23215#issuecomment-949556531). ACKs for top commit: sipsorcery: ACK f778845d972578e7abdced64ec6129d809c816f6. Tree-SHA512: 201f4e4d38c00cbec6aaeca4f3e1b60f1c65289fb68b82cead47f37f6af5ac42dd539cf8ed3566f5bd9afe4a7762d42bbabb316d58f47352d4e7bfc2214806fe
2021-10-22walletdb: Use SQLiteDatabase for mock wallet databasesAndrew Chow
Default to SQLiteDatabase instead of BerkeleyDatabase for CreateDummyWalletDatabase. Most tests already use descriptor wallets and the mock db doesn't really matter for tests. The tests where it does matter will make the db directly.
2021-10-22tests: Place into mapWallet in coinselector_testsAndrew Chow
Instead of using AddToWallet so that making a COutput will work, directly add the transaction into wallet.mapWallet. This bypasses many checks that AddToWallet will do which are pointless and just slow down this test.
2021-10-22Merge bitcoin-core/gui#454: Use only Qt translation primitives in GUI codeHennadii Stepanov
58765a450c40152db8160bca8a6b0f5b754c5858 qt: Use only Qt translation primitives in GUI code (W. J. van der Laan) Pull request description: Use `Object::tr`, `QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP`, and `QCoreApplication::translate` as appropriate instead of using `_()` which doesn't get picked up. Replaces bitcoin/bitcoin#22764 Edit: I checked that the strings end up in the appropriate context in `bitcoin_en.ts` after `make translate`: - "Settings file could not be read" "Settings file could not be written" end up in `bitcoin-core` - "(press q to shutdown and continue later)" and "press q to shutdown" end up in `SplashScreen` ACKs for top commit: hebasto: ACK 58765a450c40152db8160bca8a6b0f5b754c5858 Tree-SHA512: d0cc5901426c47d411d0fe75aac195b9684b51385f74c161da772dbf9f0977f7ad7a0976e17366f49b40718e9b6eb87c3e93306dc845f97adddbc47d00731742
2021-10-22Make AddrMan support multiple ports per IPPieter Wuille
2021-10-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23336: refactor: Make GenTxid boolean constructor privateMarcoFalke
fa4ec1c0bdaef9f082a6661d7faf16149774e145 Make GenTxid boolean constructor private (MarcoFalke) faeb9a575367119dbff60c35fa2c13547718e179 remove unused CTxMemPool::info(const uint256& txid) (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This boolean argument is either verbose (when used with a named arg) or unintuitive and dangerous (when used as a plain bool). Fix that by making the constructor private. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK fa4ec1c0bdaef9f082a6661d7faf16149774e145 jnewbery: Code review ACK fa4ec1c0bdaef9f082a6661d7faf16149774e145 glozow: code review ACK fa4ec1c0bdaef9f082a6661d7faf16149774e145 Tree-SHA512: bf08ee09168885cfda71e5a01ec412b93964662a90dd9d91e75f7fdf2eaff7c21a95204d0e90b00438bfeab564d0aea66bdb9c0394ee7a05743e65a817159446
2021-10-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23139: rpc: fix "trusted" field in ↵W. J. van der Laan
TransactionDescriptionString(), add coverage 66f6efc70a72cc1613906fd3c10281f9af0ba0db rpc: improve TransactionDescriptionString() "generated" help (Jon Atack) 296cfa312fd9ce19f1f820aeafa37d87764ad21d test: add listtransactions/listsinceblock "trusted" coverage (Jon Atack) d95913fc432f0fde9dec743884b14c5df83727af rpc: fix "trusted" description in TransactionDescriptionString (Jon Atack) Pull request description: The RPC gettransaction, listtransactions, and listsinceblock helps returned by `TransactionDescriptionString()` inform the user that the `trusted` boolean field is only present if the transaction is trusted and safe to spend from. The field is in fact returned by `WalletTxToJSON()` when the transaction has 0 confirmations (or negative confirmations, if conflicted), and it can be true or false. This patch fixes the help, adds test coverage, and touches up the help for the neighboring `generate` field. ACKs for top commit: rajarshimaitra: tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23139/commits/66f6efc70a72cc1613906fd3c10281f9af0ba0db theStack: Tested ACK 66f6efc70a72cc1613906fd3c10281f9af0ba0db Tree-SHA512: 4c2127765b82780e07bbdbf519d27163d414d9f15598e01e02210f210e6009be344c84951d7274e747b1386991d4c3b082cd25aebe885fb8cf0b92d57178f68e
2021-10-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22789: external_signer: improve fingerprint matching ↵W. J. van der Laan
logic (stop on first match) d047ed729f1d4732d23324fc76849f3c657cdbe4 external_signer: improve fingerprint matching logic (stop on first match) (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: The fingerprint matching logic in `ExternalSigner::SignTransaction` currently always iterates all inputs of a PSBT, even after a match has already been found. I guess the reason for that is not that it was not thought of, but rather the fact that breaking out of a nested loop is simply not possible (at least not without adding ugly constructs like gotos or extra state variables). This PR fixes this by using `std::any_of` from C++'s standard library, see http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/algorithm/any_of/ ACKs for top commit: lsilva01: Code Review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22789/commits/d047ed729f1d4732d23324fc76849f3c657cdbe4 Sjors: utACK d047ed7 Zero-1729: crACK d047ed729f1d4732d23324fc76849f3c657cdbe4 mjdietzx: Code review ACK d047ed729f1d4732d23324fc76849f3c657cdbe4 hebasto: ACK d047ed729f1d4732d23324fc76849f3c657cdbe4, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged. Tree-SHA512: 447e7c0c6a5b5549a2c09d52e55ba4146302c1a06e4d96de11f6945d09f98c89129cba221202dff7e0718e01a83dd173b9f19b1f02b6be228978f3f6e35d8096
2021-10-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23181: refactor: remove references to deprecated ↵W. J. van der Laan
values under std::allocator ea4b61a1570178ebe5851b5fb4065222e3926f7e refactor: remove references to deprecated values under std::allocator (Pasta) Pull request description: Removes usages of allocator::pointer, allocator::const_pointer, allocator::reference and allocator::const_reference which are deprecated in c++17 and **removed** in c++20. See https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/allocator Also prefers `using` over `typedef` see: https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Rt-using I'll be happy to revert this if requested so ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Re-ACK ea4b61a1570178ebe5851b5fb4065222e3926f7e Tree-SHA512: 9353e47a7de27bcd91b341eb2d832318b51fce9f508fcc791f05c02c5a160f430f4e7214e76f4b3e29639750d311c679789d8b7409255b13637391e4575c9ebe
2021-10-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23288: tests: remove usage of LegacyScriptPubKeyMan ↵W. J. van der Laan
from some wallet tests 2d2edc1248a2e49636409b07448676e5bfe44956 tests: Use Descriptor wallets for generic wallet tests (Andrew Chow) 99516285b7cf2664563712d95d95f54e1985c0c2 tests: Use legacy change type in subtract fee from outputs test (Andrew Chow) dcd6eeb64adb2b532f5003cbb86ba65b3c08a87b tests: Use descriptors in psbt_wallet_tests (Andrew Chow) 4b1588c6bd96743b333cc291e19a9fc76dc8cdf1 tests: Use DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan in coinselector_tests (Andrew Chow) 811319fea4295bfff05c23c0dcab1e24c85e8544 tests, gui: Use DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan in GUI tests (Andrew Chow) 9bf02438727e1052c69d906252fc2a451c923409 bench: Use DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan for wallet things (Andrew Chow) 5e54aa9b90c5d4d472be47a7fca969c5e7b92e88 bench: remove global testWallet from CoinSelection benchmark (Andrew Chow) a5595b1320d0ebd2c60833286799ee42108a7c01 tests: Remove global vCoins and testWallet from coinselector_tests (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: Currently, various tests use `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` because it was convenient for the refactor that introduced the `ScriptPubKeyMan` interface. However, with the legacy wallet slated to be removed, these tests should not continue to use `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` as they are not testing any specific legacy wallet behavior. These tests are changed to use `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan`s. Some of the coin selection tests and benchmarks had a global `testWallet`, but this seemed to cause some issues with ensuring that descriptors were set up in that wallet for each test. Those have been restructured to not have any global variables that may be modified between tests. The tests which test specific legacy wallet behavior remain unchanged. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK 2d2edc1248a2e49636409b07448676e5bfe44956 brunoerg: tACK 2d2edc1248a2e49636409b07448676e5bfe44956 Tree-SHA512: 6d60e5978e822d48e46cfc0dae4635fcb1939f21ea9d84eb72e36112e925554b7ee8f932c7ed0c4881b6566c6c19260bec346abdff1956ca9f300b30fb4e2dd1
2021-10-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23333: wallet: fix segfault by avoiding invalid ↵fanquake
default-ctored `external_spk_managers` entry 6911ab95f19d2b1f60f2d0b2f3961fa6639d4f31 wallet: fix segfault by avoiding invalid default-ctored `external_spk_managers` entry (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: Fixes #23321 (bug reported by Josef Vondrlik (josef-v)). In the method `CWallet::LoadActiveScriptPubKeyMan`, the map `external_spk_managers` (or `internal_spk_managers`, if parameter `internal` is false) is accessed via std::map::operator[], which means that a default-ctored entry is created with a null-pointer as value, if the key doesn't exist. As soon as this value is dereferenced, a segmentation fault occurs, e.g. in `CWallet::KeypoolCountExternalKeys`. The bevaviour can be reproduced by the following steps (starting with empty regtest datadir): ``` $ ./src/bitcoind -regtest -daemon $ ./src/bitcoin-cli -regtest -named createwallet_name=wallet descriptors=true blank=true $ cat regtest-descriptors.txt [ { "desc": "tr([e4445899/49'/1'/0']tprv8ZgxMBicQKsPd8jCeBWsYLEoWxbVgzJDatJ7XkwQ6G3uF4FsHuaziHQ5JZAW4K515nj6kVVwPaNWZSMEcR7aFCwL4tQqTcaoprMKTTtm6Zg/1/*)#mr3llm7f", "timestamp": 1634652324, "active": true, "internal": true, "range": [ 0, 999 ], "next": 0 } ] $ ./src/bitcoin-cli -regtest importdescriptors "$(cat regtest-descriptors.txt)" [ { "success": true } ] $ ./src/bitcoin-cli -regtest getwalletinfo error: timeout on transient error: Could not connect to the server 127.0.0.1:18443 (error code 1 - "EOF reached") ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: Code Review ACK 6911ab95f19d2b1f60f2d0b2f3961fa6639d4f31 lsilva01: Tested ACK 6911ab9 on Ubuntu 20.04. instagibbs: ACK 6911ab95f19d2b1f60f2d0b2f3961fa6639d4f31 Tree-SHA512: 76aa96847cf2739413fb68fb902afef0b3ab9381178dd62fb0abac69f853f1f6523d73c60e610375b9a7730f275eda9162503b89f5be6e6e349a8d047b59c8dc
2021-10-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23140: Make CAddrman::Select_ select buckets, not ↵W. J. van der Laan
positions, first 632aad9e6d8369750f4327a886ca5b3d3fed89bd Make CAddrman::Select_ select buckets, not positions, first (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: The original CAddrMan behaviour (before #5941) was to pick a uniformly random non-empty bucket, and then pick a random element from that bucket. That commit, which introduced deterministic placement of entries in buckets, changed this to picking a uniformly random non-empty bucket position instead. I believe that was a mistake. Buckets are our best metric for spreading out requests across independently-controlled nodes. That does mean that if a bucket has fewer entries, its entries are supposed to be picked more frequently. This PR reverts to the original high-level behavior, but on top of the deterministic placement logic. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK 632aad9e6d8369750f4327a886ca5b3d3fed89bd naumenkogs: ACK 632aad9e6d8369750f4327a886ca5b3d3fed89bd mzumsande: ACK 632aad9e6d8369750f4327a886ca5b3d3fed89bd Tree-SHA512: 60768afba2b6f0abd0dddff04381cab5acf374df48fc0e883ee16dde7cf7fd33056a04b573cff24a1b4d8e2a645bf0f0b3689eec84da4ff330e7b59ef142eca1
2021-10-22ci: Add vcpkg tools cacheHennadii Stepanov
This change avoids downloading of the cached vcpkg tools that could fail accidentally, and it makes CI task more robust.
2021-10-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23002: Make descriptor wallets by defaultMarcoFalke
9c1052a5218e191fd23c0d9fc06f2fca34b03411 wallet: Default new wallets to descriptor wallets (Andrew Chow) f19ad404631010a5e2dac2c7cbecd057b005fe2a rpc, wallet: Descriptor wallets are no longer experimental (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: Changes the default wallet type from legacy to descriptors. Descriptor wallets will now by the default type. Additionally, descriptor wallets will no longer be marked as experimental. This follows the timeline proposed in #20160 ACKs for top commit: lsilva01: Tested ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23002/commits/9c1052a5218e191fd23c0d9fc06f2fca34b03411 on Ubuntu 20.04 prayank23: tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23002/commits/9c1052a5218e191fd23c0d9fc06f2fca34b03411 meshcollider: Code review ACK 9c1052a5218e191fd23c0d9fc06f2fca34b03411 Tree-SHA512: 834e6fec88e0c18673af7ebe135bd5333694d1be502164eb93a90e3e76c27974165aa4e59426945100c88e4eca07356e16886ef5b05cf789683ecb23fc71a12a
2021-10-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23042: net: Avoid logging AlreadyHaveTx when ↵fanquake
disconnecting misbehaving peer fa2662c293ec0aaa93092b59b6632f74729c4283 net: Avoid logging AlreadyHaveTx when disconnecting misbehaving peer (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: There is no need to log `AlreadyHaveTx` for an inv when a peer is marked for disconnection due to sending that inv. In fact, I find it confusing that a `block-relay-only` connection calls `AlreadyHaveTx` at all. Also there is no need to call `AddKnownTx` when the peer is marked for disconnection. ACKs for top commit: naumenkogs: ACK fa2662c293ec0aaa93092b59b6632f74729c4283 jnewbery: Code review ACK fa2662c293ec0aaa93092b59b6632f74729c4283 dunxen: Concept and code review ACK fa2662c293ec0aaa93092b59b6632f74729c4283 Tree-SHA512: 9996b807a824021f992b5281d82ff0cbbe6a442c2fedf7dfd6adda64ccc5e0ef4fb0ff91ab75086f975837bbbb7a5934ac7e671a80dcababa7203c92fc0c7f84
2021-10-22Make GenTxid boolean constructor privateMarcoFalke
2021-10-22remove unused CTxMemPool::info(const uint256& txid)MarcoFalke