Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutex cs_main is already held by the caller of WriteUndoDataForBlock().
This change is needed to require CBlockIndex::GetUndoPos() to hold
cs_main and CBlockIndex::nStatus to be guarded by cs_main in the
following commits without adding 2 unnecessary cs_main locks to
WriteUndoDataForBlock().
|
|
|
|
923312fbf6a89efde1739da0b7209694d4f892ba rpc: use peer_id, block_hash for FetchBlock (Sjors Provoost)
34d5399211eeb61e7e7961c301fb2ddea8aa3f6a rpc: more detailed errors for getblockfrompeer (Sjors Provoost)
60243cac7286e4c4bdda7094bef4cf6d1564b583 rpc: turn already downloaded into error in getblockfrompeer (Sjors Provoost)
809d66bb65aa78048e27c2a878d6f7becaecfe11 rpc: clarify getblockfrompeer behavior when called multiple times (Sjors Provoost)
0e3d7c5ee16d5a4c061ab9a57285bceb7899b512 refactor: drop redundant hash argument from FetchBlock (Sjors Provoost)
8d1a3e6498de6087501969a9d243b0697ca3fe97 rpc: allow empty JSON object result (Sjors Provoost)
bfbf91d0b2004dde358253ac174982f784b43b59 test: fancier Python for getblockfrompeer (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Followups from #20295.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 923312fbf6a89efde1739da0b7209694d4f892ba :package:
fjahr:
tested ACK 923312fbf6a89efde1739da0b7209694d4f892ba
Tree-SHA512: da9eca76e302e249409c9d7f0d16cca668ed981e2ab6ca2d1743dad0d830b94b1bc5ffb9028a00764b863201945c273cc8f4409a4c9ca3817830007dffa2bc20
|
|
when funding a transaction
3866272c450cc659207fbc2cff3c690ae8593341 tests: Test specifying input weights (Andrew Chow)
6fa762a37298c4cd3ac063b46b7d1b353d7a658b rpc, wallet: Allow users to specify input weights (Andrew Chow)
808068e90e758b9c74878a5235b2c59731fec3e5 wallet: Allow user specified input size to override (Andrew Chow)
4060c50d7ee31dc8a39229e3553d3d92f8f3516d wallet: add input weights to CCoinControl (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When funding a transaction with external inputs, instead of providing solving data, a user may want to just provide the maximum signed size of that input. This is particularly useful in cases where the input is nonstandard as our dummy signer is unable to handle those inputs.
The input weight can be provided to any input regardless of whether it belongs to the wallet and the provided weight will always be used regardless of any calculated input weight. This allows the user to override the calculated input weight which may overestimate in some circumstances due to missing information (e.g. if the private key is not known, a maximum size signature will be used, but the actual signer may be doing additional work which reduces the size of the signature).
For `send` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, the input weight is specified in a `weight` field in an input object. For `fundrawtransaction`, a new `input_weights` field is added to the `options` object. This is an array of objects consisting of a txid, vout, and weight.
Closes #23187
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23201/commits/3866272c450cc659207fbc2cff3c690ae8593341
glozow:
reACK 3866272 via range-diff
t-bast:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23201/commits/3866272c450cc659207fbc2cff3c690ae8593341
Tree-SHA512: 2c8b471ee537c62a51389b7c4e86b5ac1c3a223b444195042be8117b3c83e29c0619463610b950cbbd1648d3ed01ecc5bb0b3c4f39640680da9157763b9b9f9f
|
|
instrumentation on x86_64
5a8f907c93f158c54e58706d6d8c6b0a1a3205ba scripts: add CONTROL_FLOW to ELF security checks (fanquake)
e13f8f775d9e8da04db0e072040d11237c5d1089 build: build x86_64 Linux Boost with -fcf-protection=full (fanquake)
6ca5efa8ed1ed9d5978bed0baf3c63dc2d406ec5 script rename control flow check to MACHO specific (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Closes #21888.
TODO:
* Duplication in security-check-tests
Guix build:
```bash
bash-5.1# find guix-build-$(git rev-parse --short=12 HEAD)/output/ -type f -print0 | env LC_ALL=C sort -z | xargs -r0 sha256sum
8025e2e6859247eaf865a4a5009d0a39570ec5e8ab51739fa4da0d8ee4ab2117 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
75576482994493262dbf7d3567b0450c0804bdc75c186d6b4c6a856bd0d8f0a3 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-aarch64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
7cb89c9327cc540859334b597c041a2250156e3e83ce2aa7d16177376056302f guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
e264053e4c7a5d65340dd7bbd2c664bcd596292ab80f00a0bf0026bfe0c480bc guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/SHA256SUMS.part
6c3ee9b3c0c4583620301b183226678f1618605dd07dbed0bbdf7d06d3591314 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz
f217cb8d8e233a8dbdbfde7dabf12c5d867d7de53e8c652b8ed1d4a55da82fd9 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz
48b4b2a1b52b3098f4e92c11cb60f1e5e9696a2a960560cd6adea72277eaa4a4 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/dist-archive/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1.tar.gz
40832db2446e129879caa9fbc9d682c53069876dbb2e0d4d76592e5dcb40bb12 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
26fdfa9b7b77d5db415ef34054cf6f6d020a5dab73239db6dd05539f654bc5d5 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-powerpc64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
3adbdb9d3eb1cb5f9adc38b29450054f286bd6d74cef8619adaee89494853605 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-powerpc64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
8ec2baf82483a698350bfdabf530cd9b5241690c916f597c746210e95ac451de guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
1797e75e1f66ec9068fa4e57e0108960475e863f8f054fbe854358b1f995c4df guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-powerpc64le-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
448bd289ef26c777a1fc4498e7ba7fb17d0f6a932dcac91b2f89cbba63704bb8 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-powerpc64le-linux-gnu.tar.gz
a23ee91eeae515c2a6a31eb25d659fab833839aaafa4676ccee364bdad2a468c guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
82df1b6d5020d0af8268ecc8e823f752f20dec308277763b2dd675804dfa4bbd guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
09a6098ce83896a6ee6d5c8aff12eaca51595bd724c8e0b2a6f90b6410dc168c guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
4fac2951f80eaa2bd1747a263be6be1b76282cac5062f7d86db631a2fb80f8db guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
3392f417b09efca5916c384f0b2d0c177a72ec4921399c62e84484f0054cc8c4 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-osx-unsigned.dmg
bfb4f8ade6107996ec4bc9efdb53959151b8fb19b6790c34472fe218dd02383d guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-osx-unsigned.tar.gz
4de92e149bad46fc863efb3b650753d194aad96be991d020e0b859452cf27457 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-osx64.tar.gz
9329549a2f275a59e329afc8744ff8cbc297f3042e0ad03b47626805c7aae2e8 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
d87deb1eca8a1d3780f02edde78350d27f700e13c7ff444be0bfb34e7369904a guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
76f3bc2fad010d9373e854d941e8205b68fa6c9a8ecaff34c4978ae3ae76c806 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
2948631081c4bd475529da2b7bc2b32b5aa2e44de46dfdaa6cf9432b3c9fe869 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/SHA256SUMS.part
c5d56fac163b73c00e9745aa7b0f9a0bd9fcac7517e39b677869b6e76faf7218 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-win-unsigned.tar.gz
f12c7cd72511544c67f4934981c090cee0d9c17e931c059edbbbef6e843dd651 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-win64-debug.zip
eb952cc4554f92ba6787353f4305d7cbcb1c6dafc4a3867b3088106252a573b8 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
7bd2b071f1cdf9410535e6a10dd1da519f942bd2c1e47ed52c5b8c4f977e8f27 guix-build-5a8f907c93f1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-5a8f907c93f1-win64.zip
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5a8f907c93f158c54e58706d6d8c6b0a1a3205ba
hebasto:
ACK 5a8f907c93f158c54e58706d6d8c6b0a1a3205ba, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 75702ac01175ccf08e73b5c3bce266cee9dd15ccf8fb38d46108cfada156de9a8c18e27d996f9343ae33f7a75a6904d335cbe25256d90af1f4ccbe72ce1788bb
|
|
cfa575266bc0198574a82e8e386040e969b05dea Optimize CHECKSIGADD Script Validation (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
This is a mild validation improvement that improves performance by caching some signature data when you have a Taproot script fragment that uses CHECKSIGADD Multisignatures with sighash single. In some basic testing I showed this to have about a 0.6% speedup during block validation for a block with a lot of CHECKSIGADDs, but that was with the entirety of block validation so the specific impact on the script interpreter performance should be a bit more once you subtract things like coin fetching. If desired I can produce a more specific/sharable bench for this, the code I used to test was just monkey patching the existing taproot tests since generating valid spends is kinda tricky. But it's sort of an obvious win so I'm not sure it needs a rigorous bench, but I will tinker on one of those while the code is being reviewed for correctness.
The overhead of this approach is that:
1. ScriptExecutionData is no longer const
2. around 32 bytes of extra stack space
3. zero extra hashing since we only cache on first use
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK cfa575266bc0198574a82e8e386040e969b05dea
MarcoFalke:
review ACK cfa575266bc0198574a82e8e386040e969b05dea
jonatack:
ACK cfa575266bc0198574a82e8e386040e969b05dea
theStack:
Code-review ACK cfa575266bc0198574a82e8e386040e969b05dea
Tree-SHA512: d5938773724bb9c97b6fd623ef7efdf7f522af52dc0903ecb88c38a518b628d7915b7eae6a774f7be653dc6bcd92e9abc4dd5e8b11f3a995e01e0102d2113d09
|
|
d67fc786d9978927e317fd313d6666fbc2d6a31e doc: Update the used Qt version (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Missed in bitcoin/bitcoin#23489.
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK d67fc78
shaavan:
ACK d67fc786d9978927e317fd313d6666fbc2d6a31e
prusnak:
ACK d67fc78
promag:
ACK d67fc786d9978927e317fd313d6666fbc2d6a31e.
Tree-SHA512: f15d83dca1c7dcdb9bd862358cd0e9a2740d88b8eaa0de8223210c9ce89e7526c6f98908bf26d512ff9271d6d59fda1d0c7ac97fcd7ef4b8b0c06d24b9d62f33
|
|
c5b36b1c1b11f04e5da7fb44183f61d09a14e40d Mempool Update Cut-Through Optimization (Jeremy Rubin)
c49daf9885e86ba08acdc8332d2a34bc5951a487 [TESTS] Increase limitancestorcount in tournament RPC test to showcase improved algorithm (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Often when we're updating mempool entries we update entries that we ultimately end up removing the updated entries shortly thereafter. This patch makes it so that we filter for such entries a bit earlier in processing, which yields a mild improvement for these cases, and is negligible overhead otherwise.
There's potential for a better -- but more sophisticated -- algorithm that can be used taking advantage of epochs, but I figured it is better to do something that is simple and works first and upgrade it later as the other epoch mempool work proceeds as it makes the patches for the epoch algorithm simpler to understand, so you can consider this as preparatory work. It could either go in now if it is not controversial, or we could wait until the other patch is ready to go.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK c5b36b1
sipa:
utACK c5b36b1c1b11f04e5da7fb44183f61d09a14e40d
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK c5b36b1c1b11f04e5da7fb44183f61d09a14e40d
Tree-SHA512: 78b16864f77a637d8a68a65e23c019a9757d8b2243486728ef601d212ae482f6084cf8e69d810958c356f1803178046e4697207ba40d6d10529ca57de647fae6
|
|
packages
3cd7f693d3ed1bb7cf9ba3e0c482174df3684972 [unit test] package parents are a mix (glozow)
de075a98eaf0b3f7676c5c78b50b66902202b34c [validation] better handle errors in SubmitPackage (glozow)
9d88853e0c85f765f7d982b15e8122ede50110ed AcceptPackage fixups (glozow)
2db77cd3b835d052de678755bcdde5a645ce2d65 [unit test] different witness in package submission (glozow)
9ad211c5753dbd148ba6f0ed56854f6364362ca8 [doc] more detailed explanation for deduplication (glozow)
83d4fb71260f268abd41d083fb3458476aed83ce [packages] return DIFFERENT_WITNESS for same-txid-different-witness tx (glozow)
Pull request description:
This addresses some comments from review on e12fafda2dfbbdf63f125e5af797ecfaa6488f66 from #22674.
- Improve documentation about de-duplication: [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22674/files#r770156708)
- Fix code looking up same-txid-different-witness transaction in mempool: [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22674/files#r770804029)
- Improve the interface for when a same-txid-different-witness transaction is swapped: [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22674/files#r770782822)
- Add a test for witness swapping: [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22674/files#r770804029)
- Add a test for packages with a mix of duplicate/different witness/new parents: [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22674#discussion_r773037608)
- Fix issue with not notifying `CValidationInterface` when there's a partial submission due to fail-fast: [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22674#discussion_r773013162)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3cd7f693d3ed1bb7cf9ba3e0c482174df3684972
t-bast:
LGTM, ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23804/commits/3cd7f693d3ed1bb7cf9ba3e0c482174df3684972
instagibbs:
ACK 3cd7f693d3ed1bb7cf9ba3e0c482174df3684972
ariard:
ACK 3cd7f69
Tree-SHA512: a5d86ca86edab80a5a05fcbb828901c058b3f2fa2552912ea52f2871e29c3cf4cc34020e7aac2217959c9c3a01856f4bd3d631d844635b98144f212f76c2f3ef
|
|
85885919656a3f606f3d7f208378aabe95f3f62d guix: ignore additioanl failing certvalidator test (fanquake)
e8a6c888e46ec6afd408feac92cd81e2be6af490 build: point to latest commit on the master branch (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Guix recently force pushed to their `version-1.4.0` branch, causing #24040. At the time #24042 pointed to the newest commit on that branch, fixing #24040, but it didn't actually build. Guix have now [temporarily removed](https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00313.html) their `version-1.4.0` branch, while they incorporate additional fixes.
This PR updates our guix time-machine to point to a recent commit on the guix master branch, so that builds can resume for all hosts apart from Windows. Windows builds are broken due to what looks like an upstream issue, which results in e failure to build the [`mingw-w64-x86_64-winpthreads package`](https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/mingw.scm#n137). The build fails with:
```bash
/gnu/store/4y5m9lb8k3qkb1y9m02sw9w9a6hacd16-bash-minimal-5.1.8/bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -Wall -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -g -O2 -no-undefined -version-info 1:0:0 -L./fakelib -Wc,-no-pthread -o libwinpthread.la -rpath /gnu/store/2bglap5gk4db8lajaahg4d7361myw5qw-mingw-w64-x86_64-winpthreads-8.0.0/lib src/libwinpthread_la-barrier.lo src/libwinpthread_la-cond.lo src/libwinpthread_la-misc.lo src/libwinpthread_la-mutex.lo src/libwinpthread_la-rwlock.lo src/libwinpthread_la-spinlock.lo src/libwinpthread_la-thread.lo src/libwinpthread_la-ref.lo src/libwinpthread_la-sem.lo src/libwinpthread_la-sched.lo src/libwinpthread_la-clock.lo src/libwinpthread_la-nanosleep.lo src/version.lo
libtool: link: x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -shared src/.libs/libwinpthread_la-barrier.o src/.libs/libwinpthread_la-cond.o src/.libs/libwinpthread_la-misc.o src/.libs/libwinpthread_la-mutex.o src/.libs/libwinpthread_la-rwlock.o src/.libs/libwinpthread_la-spinlock.o src/.libs/libwinpthread_la-thread.o src/.libs/libwinpthread_la-ref.o src/.libs/libwinpthread_la-sem.o src/.libs/libwinpthread_la-sched.o src/.libs/libwinpthread_la-clock.o src/.libs/libwinpthread_la-nanosleep.o src/.libs/version.o -L./fakelib -g -O2 -no-pthread -o .libs/libwinpthread-1.dll -Wl,--enable-auto-image-base -Xlinker --out-implib -Xlinker .libs/libwinpthread.dll.a
x86_64-w64-mingw32-ld: final link failed: bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
```
This info will be sent upstream. You can likely recreate the failure with `guix build mingw-w64-x86_64-winpthreads`.
Once Guix is at a point of tagging a 1.4.0 release commit (after re-branching and RCs), we can shift our time-machine to point to it. If a change is made upstream in relation to the Windows issue we are seeing, we will adjust our time-machine commit earlier.
Guix builds:
```bash
bash-5.1# find guix-build-$(git rev-parse --short=12 HEAD)/output/ -type f -print0 | env LC_ALL=C sort -z | xargs -r0 sha256sum
9bbaba7be551f871d940346dd8896908968e5403cdbaa9a990b98a5ef5d8a2c8 guix-build-85885919656a/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
4da3c6589afb383e689c1569d9d0379dba3e6e18039f331c91da180b937b6b68 guix-build-85885919656a/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-85885919656a-aarch64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
089c83b739149ea22809a6594aaec5b1df648d770e1086f17ab901e998b54dfd guix-build-85885919656a/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-85885919656a-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
71db39d3e84f50a4146300271077bf9687ede8a15ee450d1b62270f362c6fa98 guix-build-85885919656a/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/SHA256SUMS.part
6b6528e6077f403a53a12199a5dc98d5ea829380295aa768232d619417615465 guix-build-85885919656a/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-85885919656a-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz
4ce4d0c28d09bfd46492cd14f8d0a93c58ca827c2e5dcb7aadf74147b8aff7ea guix-build-85885919656a/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-85885919656a-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz
971b85090756ec9557792bfc7f47a013434d30ef41a19b6284c6efc425ce36bf guix-build-85885919656a/output/dist-archive/bitcoin-85885919656a.tar.gz
64b9757d597f4665dc7b71f6ff3e52671ca2783a8834ef212dd795ff98350919 guix-build-85885919656a/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
5009332c4b7a23263a99e5f39a635d1193c7300672916abd6528112ba56c71c5 guix-build-85885919656a/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-85885919656a-powerpc64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
84f0e74abe3cf499480c16b371522c6ab958e5c234514c720e7b8915be4dc62d guix-build-85885919656a/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-85885919656a-powerpc64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
f73d0fe614caaa617aa2e65f59ccf689ddd2c484878ebd0649dd2e14b31b0329 guix-build-85885919656a/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
0985d12c3aa1b7625a7369a4d4a8c7f92e1eaf4276c4457610f90d3c057a843e guix-build-85885919656a/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-85885919656a-powerpc64le-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
e35a34bc9bf9bc8b9e760b7b9da897ed9bf669dc2a36cd3d5395dbb25683d057 guix-build-85885919656a/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-85885919656a-powerpc64le-linux-gnu.tar.gz
c1800ea2353feb984f05ea6f6faa6421b5f3764a036d335fbb18c6d313176e8b guix-build-85885919656a/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
17012337bfc124970dcb26fe0bef0eb0ec57eabaafdd0533828732e407199941 guix-build-85885919656a/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-85885919656a-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
c9528178e2266ef7d2f49b6b6f65233c58c8f71d196d9347421f988ba4b662bd guix-build-85885919656a/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-85885919656a-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
2e6c4fc18b866648e35ebece7c7c8f625833c4f37c1aae8b7d0bc0d5caca6f69 guix-build-85885919656a/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
dcee189ad0b8dad71df9053db9c0e2f308c1742cb1638d60d515dafcf4cca8be guix-build-85885919656a/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-85885919656a-osx-unsigned.dmg
d9366875d36c1993831548ca94de859cbdecca26b77877012456b63bf144558e guix-build-85885919656a/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-85885919656a-osx-unsigned.tar.gz
6ddd041d2b359f1be5272e79d80deb7ed233289394cbc3436b4cc43853c9690f guix-build-85885919656a/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-85885919656a-osx64.tar.gz
ef8ce6b349d886f23341dd034463b18d0c5298cf6b2d95632ae24ca98b1b51c8 guix-build-85885919656a/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
ce5c2d681617ab1f2f20487ab0b73c48a436a3d313e7441d594a68f28a39a5d3 guix-build-85885919656a/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-85885919656a-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
b364641aff6a1cde8b1bd950a50c74e9c49a09669d5597365de4da250b41aea6 guix-build-85885919656a/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-85885919656a-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 85885919656a3f606f3d7f208378aabe95f3f62d
dunxen:
ACK 8588591
Tree-SHA512: ee75c630366200e2a93a3a82fb5f689c6f69e3a39a00e8bf61609a9f21283b6511e9e2ceb44c52550f8f231b38f5966d2ef2669ada5588272cc424cbd25a1ed2
|
|
Added tests to rpc_fundrawtransaction, wallet_send, and rpc_psbt that
test that external inputs can be spent when input weight is provided.
Also tested that the input weight overrides any calculated weight.
Additionally, rpc_psbt's external inputs test is cleaned up a bit to be
more similar to rpc_fundrawtransaction's and avoid potential pitfalls
due to non-deterministic coin selection behavior.
|
|
Coin selection requires knowing the weight of a transaction so that fees
can be estimated. However for external inputs, the weight may not be
avialble, and solving data may not be enough as the input could be one
that we do not support. By allowing users to specify input weights,
those external inputs can be included in the transaction.
Additionally, if the weight for an input is specified, that value will
always be used, regardless of whether the input is in the wallet or
solving data is available. This allows us to account for scenarios where
the wallet may be more conservative and estimate a larger input than may
actually be created.
For example, we assume the maximum DER signature size, but an external
input may be signed by a wallet which does nonce grinding in order to get
a smaller signature. In that case, the user can specify the smaller
input weight to avoid overpaying transaction fees.
|
|
If the user specifies an input size, allow it to override any input size
calculations during coin selection.
|
|
In order to allow coin selection to take weights from the user,
CCoinControl needs to be able to set and get them.
|
|
fa2bcc4e42e7fed61727b3de4019e9702d4090ce Run coin.IsSpent only once in a row (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to commit 64e4963c635ec3a73a5fa3f32f6ec08e70609f60 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23976#discussion_r787758193
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK fa2bcc4e42e7fed61727b3de4019e9702d4090ce, agree the assertion is sufficient
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa2bcc4e42e7fed61727b3de4019e9702d4090ce
w0xlt:
crACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24102/commits/fa2bcc4e42e7fed61727b3de4019e9702d4090ce
shaavan:
Code Review ACK fa2bcc4e42e7fed61727b3de4019e9702d4090ce
brunoerg:
crACK fa2bcc4e42e7fed61727b3de4019e9702d4090ce
Tree-SHA512: 3be9d6b313bf6bb835f031826c81777b4659118d839001d084e72462391cb64ba81d06a5e07fd21fcfb709a71b08892b23212a98604ce8481da489476b72f072
|
|
Mutex, and rename it
dec787d8ac2e8fb42db87431dd622bf44897bc4e refactor: replace RecursiveMutex `m_addr_local_mutex` with Mutex (w0xlt)
93609c1dfad70961697d0d12bf01cd34b8ceb6c8 p2p: add assertions and negative TS annotations for m_addr_local_mutex (w0xlt)
c4a31ca267f74bff76a43878177d05d22825a203 scripted-diff: rename cs_addrLocal -> m_addr_local_mutex (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR is related to #19303 and gets rid of the `RecursiveMutex cs_addrLocal`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK dec787d8ac2e8fb42db87431dd622bf44897bc4e, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
shaavan:
reACK dec787d8ac2e8fb42db87431dd622bf44897bc4e
Tree-SHA512: b7a043bfd4e2ccbe313bff21ad815169db6ad215ca96daf358ce960c496a548b4a9e90be9e4357430ca59652b96df87c097450118996c6d4703cbaabde2072d0
|
|
scripted-diffs
d8dfc403f74858b79c87f650b5d609aa60a4dc3b script: redirecting stderr to stdout before pipelining into grep (anouar kappitou)
30df5c3dd4d39d9027b0341d01d3233400104893 script: preventing non-compatible sed binary. (anouar kappitou)
Pull request description:
This Pull request improve scripted diff by checking for non-compatible sed binary. Fixes #19815
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
reACK d8dfc403f74858b79c87f650b5d609aa60a4dc3b
theStack:
Tested ACK d8dfc403f74858b79c87f650b5d609aa60a4dc3b
Tree-SHA512: 4813abb02195e04b8953662e51cba4599789e6185a6d384f56255e2d37c2b16be46c7c8861e44ba1a13d42573a58eb708901472925cb308dba2f602020e9f0f6
|
|
with CNetMessage::m_type
224d87855ec38cc15866d9673e1b19942a82c1cd net, refactor: Drop tautological local variables (Hennadii Stepanov)
3073a9917b31d15ba958ea8148585633ba905f8b scripted-diff: Rename CNetMessage::m_command with CNetMessage::m_type (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18533#issue-594592488:
> a message is not a command, but simply a message of some type
Continuation of bitcoin/bitcoin#18533 and bitcoin/bitcoin#18937.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK 224d87855ec38cc15866d9673e1b19942a82c1cd
shaavan:
Code Review ACK 224d87855ec38cc15866d9673e1b19942a82c1cd
w0xlt:
crACK 224d878
Tree-SHA512: 898cafb44708dae1413fcc1533d809d75878891354f1b5edaaec1287f4921c31adc9330f4d42d82544a39689886bc17fee71ea587f9199fd5cc849d376f82176
|
|
A bitcoin/bitcoin#23489 follow up.
|
|
9b8dcb25b57ad31b77c9f37d9a1f5b07dc6378b4 [net processing] Rename PoissonNextSendInbound to NextInvToInbounds (John Newbery)
ea99f5d01e56ab0192d211da1034ffb299876937 [net processing] Move PoissonNextSendInbound to PeerManager (John Newbery)
bb060746df22c956b8f44e5b8cd1ae4ed73faddc scripted-diff: replace PoissonNextSend with GetExponentialRand (John Newbery)
03cfa1b6035dbcf6a414f9bc432bd9e612801ebb [refactor] Use uint64_t and std namespace in PoissonNextSend (John Newbery)
9e64d69bf74c8a381fb59841519cc3736bce14d4 [move] Move PoissonNextSend to src/random and update comment (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
`PoissonNextSend` and `PoissonNextSendInbound` are used in the p2p code to obfuscate various regularly occurring processes, in order to make it harder for others to get timing-based information deterministically.
The naming of these functions has been confusing to several people (including myself, see also #23347) because the resulting random timestamps don't follow a Poisson distribution but an exponential distribution (related to events in a Poisson process, hence the name). This PR
- moves `PoissonNextSend()` out of `net` to `random` and renames it to `GetExponentialRand()`
- moves `PoissonNextSendInbound()` out of `CConnman` to `PeerManager` and renames it to `NextInvToInbounds()`
- adds documentation for these functions
This is work by jnewbery - due to him being less active currently, I opened the PR and will address feedback.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 9b8dcb25b5
hebasto:
ACK 9b8dcb25b57ad31b77c9f37d9a1f5b07dc6378b4, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
theStack:
ACK 9b8dcb25b57ad31b77c9f37d9a1f5b07dc6378b4 📊
Tree-SHA512: 85c366c994e7147f9981fe863fb9838502643fa61ffd32d55a43feef96a38b79a5daa2c4d38ce01074897cc95fa40c76779816edad53f5265b81b05c3a1f4f50
|
|
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Falbesoner <sebastian.falbesoner@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
pubkeys
36012ef143917f97179d3ba6599ef36a26a9a014 qa: test descriptors with mixed xpubs and const pubkeys (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Writing unit tests for Miniscript descriptors i noticed that `test/descriptor_tests`'s `DoCheck()` assumes that a descriptor would either contain only extended keys or only const pubkeys: if it detects an xpub in the descriptor it would assert the number of cached keys is equal to the number of keys in the descriptor, which does not hold if the descriptor also contains const (raw?) public keys since we only cache parent xpubs.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 36012ef143917f97179d3ba6599ef36a26a9a014
Tree-SHA512: 2ede67a6dff726bcad3e260f3deb25c9b77542ed1880eb4ad136730b741014ce950396c69c7027225de1ef27108d609bafd055188b88538ace0beb13c7e34b0b
|
|
faedb111d2df78eabddaeccaba42f47572388bc7 refactor tests to fix ubsan suppressions (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The ubsan suppressions for test files have several issues:
* They bloat the suppressions file, distracting from real bugs
* They are file-wide, thus suppressing any other (newly introduced) issues in the same file
* Some of them are causing compile issues with -Wimplicit-int-conversion
Fix all issues by making the integer truncations or sign changes explicit.
This is a refactor that shouldn't change the test binary unless compiled with sanitizers.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK faedb111d2df78eabddaeccaba42f47572388bc7 per `git range-diff 1824644a fa9bab0 faedb11` and clang 13 debug build sanity check
Tree-SHA512: a1a6aaf2cf52562a49220375deb10062b388c1ccb7ddcd9ef2a8e6b9873961c5b285704799589b7dd5579f3db8692ba72a9d622172b4e4d2423534cd550e8859
|
|
|
|
Mutex, and rename it
5e7e4c9f6e57f5333bd17a20b0c85a78d032998e refactor: replace RecursiveMutex g_maplocalhost_mutex with Mutex (w0xlt)
a7da1409bc9f614009f76c1bfc55f029ff1265e4 scripted-diff: rename cs_mapLocalHost -> g_maplocalhost_mutex (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR is related to #19303 and gets rid of the `RecursiveMutex cs_mapLocalHost`.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK 5e7e4c9f6e57f5333bd17a20b0c85a78d032998e
theStack:
ACK 5e7e4c9f6e57f5333bd17a20b0c85a78d032998e
hebasto:
ACK 5e7e4c9f6e57f5333bd17a20b0c85a78d032998e, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 961171e346fe385e16db9830115a8096f4ca2499bbea11a08c02ca808638dfb63c434ab9d66392c71e85be6352c8a2b6a0054b5a61aaabd28d71581fed5beae7
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/cs_addrLocal/m_addr_local_mutex/g' -- $(git grep --files-with-matches 'cs_addrLocal')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
======================================================================
ERROR: test_revocation_mode_soft (tests.test_validate.ValidateTests)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/guix-build-python-certvalidator-0.1-1.e5bdb4b.drv-0/source/tests/test_validate.py", line 85, in test_revocation_mode_soft
validate_path(context, path)
File "/tmp/guix-build-python-certvalidator-0.1-1.e5bdb4b.drv-0/source/tests/../certvalidator/validate.py", line 50, in validate_path
return _validate_path(validation_context, path)
File "/tmp/guix-build-python-certvalidator-0.1-1.e5bdb4b.drv-0/source/tests/../certvalidator/validate.py", line 358, in _validate_path
raise PathValidationError(pretty_message(
certvalidator.errors.PathValidationError: The path could not be validated because the end-entity certificate expired 2022-01-14 12:00:00Z
|
|
The version-1.4.0 branch no-longer exists, and will be branched off
master again shortly.
|
|
signing on Windows
e2ab9f83f8655bf09ea392beeee36b2bbe29769b build: disable external signer on Windows (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This change explicitly disables support for external signing when targeting Windows and OpenBSD. The driver for this is that Boost Process uses boost::filesystem internally, when targeting Windows, which gets in the way of removing our usage of it (#20744). While we could adjust #20744 to still link against the Boost libs when building for Windows, that would be disappointing, as we wouldn't have cleanly removed the Boost usage we're trying too (including the build infrastructure), and, we'd be in a position where we would be building releases differently depending on the platform, which is something I want to avoid.
After discussion with Sjors, Achow and Hebasto, this seemed like a reasonable step to move #20744 forward (as-is). Note that support for external signing ([while already being experimental](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/external-signer.md#example-usage)), could be considered even more experimental on Windows. Also, oddly, we have external-signing [explicitly disabled in our Windows (cross-compile) CI](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/807169e10b4a18324356ed6ee4d69587b96a7c70/ci/test/00_setup_env_win64.sh#L16), it's not clear why this is the case, as, if it's a feature being built into releases, it should be being built and tested in the CI which is most-like the release process.
There is an [issue open upstream](https://github.com/boostorg/process/issues/207), in regards to migrating Boost Process to std::filesystem, or having an option to use it. However there hasn't been much discussion since it was opened ~9 months ago. There is another related issue here: https://github.com/klemens-morgenstern/boost-process/issues/164.
Resolves #24036.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK e2ab9f8
achow101:
ACK e2ab9f83f8655bf09ea392beeee36b2bbe29769b
kallewoof:
utACK e2ab9f83f8655bf09ea392beeee36b2bbe29769b
hebasto:
ACK e2ab9f83f8655bf09ea392beeee36b2bbe29769b, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (x86_64).
Tree-SHA512: 36fcfc0e1a008a8271dc76b8e12e93d3e1d1e528bf668e95a559e9f6fd7d5f031bd7a6a6bc8b9fa9d057b2cd56f9ec8838c7f74e87899bf9a6aeb787afbd112c
|
|
dc5d6b0d4793ca978f71f69ef7d6b818794676c2 fs: Make compatible with boost 1.78 (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Boost 1.78 removed `operator+` in a way that breaks our usage of it in a subclass. A [proposed workaround](https://github.com/boostorg/filesystem/issues/223#issuecomment-1000230207) for this is to cast the argument to `boost::filesystem::path`, and this is backwards compatible with older versions of boost.
Additionally, it appears that `fs::canonical` no longer removes trailing slashes. This was causing a test to fail. The solution is to explicitly remove the trailing separator in the one place that `fs::canonical` is used.
Lastly, `fs::create_directories` now has an error message saying `create_directories` instead of `create_directory`. This caused wallet_multiwallet.py to fail. The error message check has been updated to be able accept either string.
Fixes #23846
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK dc5d6b0d4793ca978f71f69ef7d6b818794676c2
vincenzopalazzo:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24104/commits/dc5d6b0d4793ca978f71f69ef7d6b818794676c2
Tree-SHA512: d4d8e7b49b8dfbf0ced9bfe9a2b3827841227fc755fc799f19159076b0ccf882432cc8b6ad93cdeda98fb58b942b9ba50a9e0a6b4f6b1e0097e80f1074ae5682
|
|
10 build
6897c4bdf51a4aa74320ebfffa9467db14670109 build: patch depends zeromq to fix building on NetBSD Current (fanquake)
ce6dd2f1a2e2c56d86d00e0eeec34c9982017416 zeromq 4.3.4 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This is a prerequisite for #23955. It updates zeromq to the latest available version, and adds a patch, [that I've sent upstream](https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/4326), to fix building on NetBSD Current (10).
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 6897c4bdf51a4aa74320ebfffa9467db14670109, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: d05d9753630faebe842e1ca70c8c4af660a38e7331a9d95e84df3a3b14564c5118ca41c4fc49fb71dfee563b63e1014e5a3f8874d652e26de59e8e188a12970e
|
|
|
|
|
|
Follow-up to commit 64e4963c635ec3a73a5fa3f32f6ec08e70609f60
|
|
e177fcab3831b6d259da5164cabedcc9e78f6957 Replace `struct update_lock_points` with lambda (glozow)
c7cd98c7176800a51e6a6b3634a26b508aa33ff2 document and clean up MaybeUpdateMempoolForReorg (glozow)
Pull request description:
followup to #23683, addressing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23683#issuecomment-989741186
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK e177fcab3831b6d259da5164cabedcc9e78f6957, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
instagibbs:
ACK e177fcab3831b6d259da5164cabedcc9e78f6957
MarcoFalke:
Approach ACK e177fcab3831b6d259da5164cabedcc9e78f6957 😶
Tree-SHA512: 8c2709dd5cab73cde41f3e5655d5f237bacfb341f78eac026169be579528695ca628c8777b7d89760d8677a4e6786913293681cfe16ab702b30c909703e1824c
|
|
bf044ef9ecc93a69619cbaa9fa2b874d5fc06932 build: specify hosts for qrencode package (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Similar to how we specify the OS's we build Qt for, specify which OS's
we will build qrencode for (a qt dependency). This commit alone doesn't
change anything, but when we start supporting other OS's, i.e #23948,
where we wont support qt (or at least initially), it'll skip building
the qrencode package, which would be unused.
I'll rebase the other *BSD changes on top of this.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK bf044ef9ecc93a69619cbaa9fa2b874d5fc06932, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 3f5f11f122704a664dd77d8da0b7e9b95d44b2f1514d0199deed9b8b8ad0d8883a1de1f444b796c5f4681f423a380c3905fce720d7d2b788130162c907c2ce3b
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
s() { sed -i 's/cs_mapLocalHost/g_maplocalhost_mutex/g' $1; }
s src/net.cpp
s src/net.h
s src/rpc/net.cpp
s src/test/net_tests.cpp
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
bd52684508ca2964e6a3af503d21ff99675380c7 test: rest /tx with an invalid/unknown txid (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage to the endpoint `/tx` (rest) passing an invalid and an unknown txid to test its return.
Invalid -> should return status code 400 (bad request)
Unknown -> should return status code 404 (not found)
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
ACK bd52684508ca2964e6a3af503d21ff99675380c7
Tree-SHA512: a7fbb63f30d06fc0855133a36e8317c7930ba13aa2b4a2dd1fc35079d59eacace72e1ffe7ae1b3e067066fe51792415940d72d923e83a659a0d5965e4110b32a
|
|
86a4a15bdcc96eb565ab80166642d71d542061a9 Highlight DNS request part (Prayank)
Pull request description:
_What?_
Highlight DNS requests part in Proxy section
_Why?_
1. DNS requests are very important while considering privacy
2. Lot of users might skip reading it because of the way it is mixed with everything else in the doc right now
3. I have seen lot of users ignoring DNS requests or unaware of such things while using privacy tools
_How?_
Initially I had tried keeping these lines separate from code block but [Jonatack didn't agree with the changes](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21157#discussion_r618177116). Harding suggested using [bold/italic in `<pre></pre>`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21157#discussion_r644364143). I have used the suggestions from previous PR and added `---`
This is a part of alternative described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22316
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 86a4a15bdcc96eb565ab80166642d71d542061a9
Rspigler:
ACK 86a4a15bdcc96eb565ab80166642d71d542061a9
achow101:
ACK 86a4a15bdcc96eb565ab80166642d71d542061a9
RiccardoMasutti:
ACK 86a4a15
lsilva01:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22317/commits/86a4a15bdcc96eb565ab80166642d71d542061a9
kristapsk:
ACK 86a4a15bdcc96eb565ab80166642d71d542061a9
theStack:
ACK 86a4a15bdcc96eb565ab80166642d71d542061a9
Tree-SHA512: a4fe0e8c08df330e5ca78ce19ce74be7034c653f4374469d928908847a6debf385283e3a6da66de600566c7bab6290ccd35df26864aef94cbb3f294123391437
|
|
`indentLevel` arguments
f25114148320c3fe07af3abc6e2f150d0a2c10f4 util: Fix mis-swapped `prettyIndent` and `indentLevel` arguments (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master d0bf9bb6a539f151ec92725d20a2b6c22cb095a5:
```
$ cat settings.json
{
"wallet": [
"210803d"
]
}
```
With this PR:
```
$ cat settings.json
{
"wallet": [
"210803d"
]
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f25114148320c3fe07af3abc6e2f150d0a2c10f4. Nice catch!
Tree-SHA512: 1c315c807a070039c05a77f4e8855011d468b9aeb141e4fa3b1e1aaaab252e3831e8bdfe0caddf7704a00492799022f761f6d21a047c5bf75cdbcc96f04fc04e
|
|
|
|
No behavior change.
This code was introduced in 5add7a7 before we required C++11, which is
why the struct was needed. As we are now using more modern C++ and this
is the only place where lockpoints are updated for mempool entries, it
is more idiomatic to call `modify` with a lambda.
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
|