| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Co-authored-by: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
|
|
Move the class `HasReason` from `miner_tests.cpp` to
`setup_common.h` so that it can be reused by other tests.
|
|
Move the function `HasPrefix()` from `netaddress.cpp` to `util/string.h`
so it can be reused by `CNetAddr` methods (and possibly others).
|
|
ab654c7d587b33d62230394663020439f80cee28 Unroll Keccak-f implementation (Pieter Wuille)
3f01ddb01bfffd49dfa131898d1c674ac5d0ac99 Add SHA3 benchmark (Pieter Wuille)
2ac8bf95834c8a43ebf365f09fb610829733134b Implement keccak-f[1600] and SHA3-256 (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Add a simple (and initially unoptimized) Keccak/SHA3 implementation based on https://github.com/mjosaarinen/tiny_sha3/blob/master/sha3.c, as one will be needed for TORv3 support (the conversion from BIP155 encoding to .onion notation uses a SHA3-based checksum). In follow-up commits, a benchmark is added, and the Keccakf function is unrolled for a (for me) 4.9x speedup.
Test vectors are taken from https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cryptographic-algorithm-validation-program/secure-hashing#sha3vsha3vss.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK ab654c7d587b33d62230394663020439f80cee28 -- patch looks correct and no sanitizer complaints when doing some basic fuzz testing of the added code (remember: **don't trust: fuzz!**) :)
laanwj:
re-ACK ab654c7d587b33d62230394663020439f80cee28
vasild:
ACK ab654c7
Tree-SHA512: 8a91b18c46e8fb178b7ff82046cff626180362337e515b92fbbd771876e795da2ed4e3995eb4849773040287f6e687237f469a90474ac53f521fc12e0f5031d9
|
|
fa188c9c59b8c3e43c31be01797f073e27a7bc10 test: Use MiniWalet in p2p_feefilter (MarcoFalke)
fa39c62eb7f39e7d249b8d46c075c4e7a9aec684 test: inline hashToHex (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This introduces a minimalistic test wallet, which can be used as a drop in replacement for the Bitcoin Core wallet to create dummy transactions with a given fee rate.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fa188c9c59b8c3e43c31be01797f073e27a7bc10
Tree-SHA512: 0aad9cb14eea4f0055bd6a47cc8c8f82a16941b152598c3bf1e083aae84cca4ffa23f0b854a362a68be1b917deba1b5ec7c0207b63b0805d747ba9a7d1d82efe
|
|
CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers twice
fa7e407b504bc60c77341f02636ed9d6a4b53d79 Do not pass chain params to CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers twice (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`PeerManager` already keeps a reference to the chain params as a member variable. No need to pass it in once again as a function parameter.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK fa7e407b504bc60c77341f02636ed9d6a4b53d79
jnewbery:
code review ACK fa7e407b504bc60c77341f02636ed9d6a4b53d79
epson121:
Code review ACK fa7e407b504bc60c77341f02636ed9d6a4b53d79
Tree-SHA512: 640c2d8adf9f1d54d0bfbdf81989064be2f5ba4b534d07d42258b372dc130f7b9c3fd087c7d28f0439678d124127f5d6f82f3139b1766f59f5ed661e7ac2a923
|
|
|
|
bb6a32ce9983c72afa90f41a43a47ffd703ca006 [net processing] Move Misbehaving() to PeerManager (John Newbery)
aa114b1c9b06c2bd3ed936bbb9fb32b31f75bdb2 [net_processing] Move SendBlockTransactions into PeerManager (John Newbery)
3115e00f75b41d9765dcbb376e367b25f61a1d58 [net processing] Move MaybePunishPeerForTx to PeerManager (John Newbery)
e662e2d42afaf9c67c898634a0f3bc200255b6ea [net processing] Move ProcessOrphanTx to PeerManager (John Newbery)
b70cd890e375e904b7f36b3d959e5656f5a5cbcd [net processing] Move MaybePunishNodeForBlock into PeerManager (John Newbery)
d7778351bf60a21925a97b7fc4e9df5541b6d995 [net processing] Move ProcessHeadersMessage to PeerManager (John Newbery)
64f6162651420be2f4aa1498f0378a86780bc089 [whitespace] tidy up indentation after scripted diff (John Newbery)
58bd369b0ddd3383f7bdf7840912d18b96545f91 scripted-diff: [net processing] Rename PeerLogicValidation to PeerManager (John Newbery)
2297b26b3ce95e935c0ebb8c38dabf19965054a5 [net_processing] Pass chainparams to PeerLogicValidation constructor (John Newbery)
824bbd1ffba3df7ffa6f5bfaa31298cd484473b1 [move only] Collect all private members of PeerLogicValidation together (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Continues the work of moving net_processing logic into PeerLogicValidation. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19704 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19607#discussion_r462032894 for motivation.
This PR also renames `PeerLogicValidation` to `PeerManager` as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10756#pullrequestreview-53892618.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK bb6a32ce99 only change is rebase due to conflict in struct NodeContext and variable rename 🤸
hebasto:
re-ACK bb6a32ce9983c72afa90f41a43a47ffd703ca006, only rebased, and added renaming `s/peer_logic/peerman/` into scripted-diff since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19791#pullrequestreview-483118079) review (verified with `git range-diff`).
Tree-SHA512: a2de4a521688fd25125b401e5575402c52b328a0fa27b3010567008d4f596b960aabbd02b2d81f42658f88f4365443fadb1008150a62fbcea123fb42d85a2c21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/PeerLogicValidation/PeerManager/g' $(git grep -l PeerLogicValidation ./src ./test)
sed -i 's/peer_logic/peerman/g' $(git grep -l peer_logic ./src ./test)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
PeerLogicValidation was originally net_processing's implementation to
the validation interface. It has since grown to contain much of
net_processing's logic. Therefore rename it to reflect its
responsibilities.
Suggested in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10756#pullrequestreview-53892618.
|
|
Keep a references to chainparams, rather than calling the global
Params() function every time it's needed. This is fine, since
globalChainParams does not get updated once it's been set, and it's
available at the point of constructing the PeerLogicValidation object.
|
|
We don't have a project style for ordering class members, but it always
makes sense to have no more than one of each public/protected/private
specifier.
Also move documentation for MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect to the header.
|
|
296be8f58e02b39a58f017c52294aceed22c3ffd Get rid of unused functions CTxMemPool::GetMemPoolChildren, CTxMemPool::GetMemPoolParents (Jeremy Rubin)
46d955d196043cc297834baeebce31ff778dff80 Remove mapLinks in favor of entry inlined structs with iterator type erasure (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Currently we have a peculiar data structure in the mempool called maplinks. Maplinks job is to track the in-pool children and parents of each transaction. This PR can be primarily understood and reviewed as a simple refactoring to remove this extra data structure, although it comes with a nice memory and performance improvement for free.
Maplinks is particularly peculiar because removing it is not as simple as just moving it's inner structure to the owning CTxMempoolEntry. Because TxLinks (the class storing the setEntries for parents and children) store txiters to each entry in the mempool corresponding to the parent or child, it means that the TxLinks type is "aware" of the boost multiindex (mapTx) it's coming from, which is in turn, aware of the entry type stored in mapTx. Thus we used maplinks to store this entry associated data we in an entirely separate data structure just to avoid a circular type reference caused by storing a txiter inside a CTxMempoolEntry.
It turns out, we can kill this circular reference by making use of iterator_to multiindex function and std::reference_wrapper. This allows us to get rid of the maplinks data structure and move the ownership of the parents/child sets to the entries themselves.
The benefit of this good all around, for any of the reasons given below the change would be acceptable, and it doesn't make the code harder to reason about or worse in any respect (as far as I can tell, there's no tradeoff).
### Simpler ownership model
No longer having to consistency check that mapLinks did have records for our CTxMempoolEntry, impossible to have a mapLinks entry outlive or incorrectly die before a CTxMempoolEntry.
### Memory Usage
We get rid of a O(Transactions) sized map in the mempool, which is a long lived data structure.
### Performance
If you have a CTxMemPoolEntry, you immediately know the address of it's children/parents, rather than having to do a O(log(Transactions)) lookup via maplinks (which we do very often). We do it in *so many* places that a true benchmark has to look at a full running node, but it is easy enough to show an improvement in this case.
The ComplexMemPool shows a good coherence check that we see the expected result of it being 12.5% faster / 1.14x faster.
```
Before:
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 1.40462, 0.277222, 0.285339, 0.279793
After:
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 1.22586, 0.243831, 0.247076, 0.244596
```
The ComplexMemPool benchmark only checks doing addUnchecked and TrimToSize for 800 transactions. While this bench does a good job of hammering the relevant types of function, it doesn't test everything.
Subbing in 5000 transactions shows a that the advantage isn't completely wiped out by other asymptotic factors (this isn't the only bottleneck in growing the mempool), but it's only a bit proportionally slower (10.8%, 1.12x), which adds evidence that this will be a good change for performance minded users.
```
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 59.1321, 11.5919, 12.235, 11.7068
# Benchmark, evals, iterations, total, min, max, median
ComplexMemPool, 5, 1, 52.1307, 10.2641, 10.5206, 10.4306
```
I don't think it's possible to come up with an example of where a maplinks based design would have better performance, but it's something for reviewers to consider.
# Discussion
## Why maplinks in the first place?
I spoke with the author of mapLinks (sdaftuar) a while back, and my recollection from our conversation was that it was implemented because he did not know how to resolve the circular dependency at the time, and there was no other reason for making it a separate map.
## Is iterator_to weird?
iterator_to is expressly for this purpose, see https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_51_0/libs/multi_index/doc/tutorial/indices.html#iterator_to
> iterator_to provides a way to retrieve an iterator to an element from a pointer to the element, thus making iterators and pointers interchangeable for the purposes of element pointing (not so for traversal) in many situations. This notwithstanding, it is not the aim of iterator_to to promote the usage of pointers as substitutes for real iterators: the latter are specifically designed for handling the elements of a container, and not only benefit from the iterator orientation of container interfaces, but are also capable of exposing many more programming bugs than raw pointers, both at compile and run time. iterator_to is thus meant to be used in scenarios where access via iterators is not suitable or desireable:
>
> - Interoperability with preexisting APIs based on pointers or references.
> - Publication of pointer-based interfaces (for instance, when designing a C-compatible library).
> - The exposure of pointers in place of iterators can act as a type erasure barrier effectively decoupling the user of the code from the implementation detail of which particular container is being used. Similar techniques, like the famous Pimpl idiom, are used in large projects to reduce dependencies and build times.
> - Self-referencing contexts where an element acts upon its owner container and no iterator to itself is available.
In other words, iterator_to is the perfect tool for the job by the last reason given. Under the hood it should just be a simple pointer cast and have no major runtime overhead (depending on if the function call is inlined).
Edit by laanwj: removed at sign from the description
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 296be8f per `git range-diff ab338a19 3ba1665 296be8f`, sanity check gcc 10.2 debug build is clean.
hebasto:
re-ACK 296be8f58e02b39a58f017c52294aceed22c3ffd, only rebased since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19478#pullrequestreview-482400727) review (verified with `git range-diff`).
Tree-SHA512: f5c30a4936fcde6ae32a02823c303b3568a747c2681d11f87df88a149f984a6d3b4c81f391859afbeb68864ef7f6a3d8779f74a58e3de701b3d51f78e498682e
|
|
fafb381af8279b2d2ca768df0bf68d7eb036a2f9 Remove mempool global (MarcoFalke)
fa0359c5b30730744aa8a7cd9ffab79ded91041f Remove mempool global from p2p (MarcoFalke)
eeee1104d78eb59a582ee1709ff4ac2c33ee1190 Remove mempool global from init (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This refactor unlocks some nice potential features, such as, but not limited to:
* Removing the fee estimates global (would avoid slightly fragile workarounds such as #18766)
* Making the mempool optional for a "blocksonly" operation mode
Even absent those features, the new code without the global should be easier to maintain, read and write tests for.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fafb381af8279b2d2ca768df0bf68d7eb036a2f9
hebasto:
ACK fafb381af8279b2d2ca768df0bf68d7eb036a2f9, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
darosior:
ACK fafb381af8279b2d2ca768df0bf68d7eb036a2f9
Tree-SHA512: a2e696dc377e2e81eaf9c389e6d13dde4a48d81f3538df88f4da502d3012dd61078495140ab5a5854f360a06249fe0e1f6a094c4e006d8b5cc2552a946becf26
|
|
abac4367607d8d2b628e4db6a9663c960bacdacc wallet: Avoid multiple BerkeleyBatch in DelAddressBook (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK abac4367607d8d2b628e4db6a9663c960bacdacc
jonatack:
ACK abac4367607d8d2b628e4db6a9663c960bacdacc
meshcollider:
re-utACK abac4367607d8d2b628e4db6a9663c960bacdacc
Tree-SHA512: 92309fb74c48694160807326c0fe9793044a75cd77ed19400cceab54a7eefeb54ffc9334535e6021b3af7b9a364dbbeda3a9173540fff8144dfd437e96d76b5c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7bf6dfbb484adfda3b8df26ee3e2ebda239dd263 wallet: Remove path checking code from bitcoin-wallet tool (Russell Yanofsky)
77d5bb72b8722ec7a6c7c33479a532cbd5870ba4 wallet: Remove path checking code from createwallet RPC (Russell Yanofsky)
a987438e9d9cad0b5530e218a447928485f3fd93 wallet: Remove path checking code from loadwallet RPC (Russell Yanofsky)
8b5e7297c02f3100a9cb27bfe206e3fc617ec173 refactor: Pass wallet database into CWallet::Create (Russell Yanofsky)
3c815cfe54087fd139169161d2fd175e99840e6a wallet: Remove Verify and IsLoaded methods (Russell Yanofsky)
0d94e6062547f288a75921d2433458a44a5f2297 refactor: Use DatabaseStatus and DatabaseOptions types (Russell Yanofsky)
b5b414151af32e5a07b5757b64482d77519d77c0 wallet: Add MakeDatabase function (Russell Yanofsky)
288b4ffb6b291f0466d513ff3c40af6758ca7c88 Remove WalletLocation class (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Get rid of file path handling in wallet application code and move it down to database layer.
There is no change in behavior except for some changed error messages.
Motivation for this change is to make code more understandable, but also to prepare for adding SQLite support in #19077 so SQLite implementation can be contained at the database layer and wallet loading code does not need to become more complicated.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7bf6dfbb484adfda3b8df26ee3e2ebda239dd263
meshcollider:
Code re-review and functional test run ACK 7bf6dfbb484adfda3b8df26ee3e2ebda239dd263
Tree-SHA512: 23ad18324c9e8947f0cf88a3734c2e9fb25536b2cb4d552cf5d1a4ade320fbffb73bb2d1b3a99585c11630aa7092e0fcfc2dd4fe65b91e3a54161433a5cd13cb
|
|
637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1 Change FILE_CHAR_BLOCKLIST to FILE_CHARS_DISALLOWED (Benoit Verret)
Pull request description:
Blocklist is ambiguous. It could mean a list of blocks.
Example: "blocknotify" in the same file refers to Bitcoin blocks.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1
laanwj:
ACK 637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1 — this is a clear variable name improvement
theStack:
ACK 637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1
jonatack:
ACK 637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1
eriknylund:
ACK 637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1
promag:
ACK 637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1.
Tree-SHA512: 028e7102eeaf61105736c55c119a7f5c05411f2b6715a7939c41cb9e8f13afb757bbb6e7a302b3aae21722e69dab91f6eff8099e5884d248299905b4c7687c02
|
|
Blocklist is ambiguous. It could mean a list of blocks.
Example: "blocknotify" in the same file refers to Bitcoin blocks.
|
|
2f79e9d00206a5230377f49be7b2f6da70f80417 refactor: remove unused header <arpa/inet.h> in protocol.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
There is no code using types or functions related to "internet operations" anymore in protocol.cpp (since #735, more than 8 years ago!), hence the header include can be removed.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 2f79e9d00206a5230377f49be7b2f6da70f80417 -- patch looks correct and CI is happy
epson121:
Code review ACK 2f79e9d00206a5230377f49be7b2f6da70f80417
laanwj:
ACK 2f79e9d00206a5230377f49be7b2f6da70f80417
promag:
Code review ACK 2f79e9d00206a5230377f49be7b2f6da70f80417.
Tree-SHA512: b3f75fa080125a34ce224f11eb13ec7b914cd9930e3bbed24f550031ce92a7e0830e8ff20159d737ffe487dfd28c24c273ad5e89c6932c8c6960d7fadb6c5e54
|
|
56b018ca7f37d25041b74f1bec305bdf54a55b9b test: Fix flaky wallet_basic test (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Fixes #19853
I investigated the issue in #19876 and I still intend to fix the underlying issue of a race when using wallet RPCs right after starting a node in that PR. However, since that is a bit more complicated than I initially thought it makes sense to merge the fix of the test so the intermittent test failures stop. This fix in the test is going to be needed, either way, #19876 will only provide an error where before it was reporting a false balance.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 52bb2388a3e77aa20d26ab0fd45796bc1781483b1cffe49cbb44e2488a72e76998edfb1198495373f9c6fd2ec26064d4176bd1a64dd59806622d5e50a4f4e870
|
|
|
|
fa8e1487144eab237ffd291397355ef4801f46f8 ci: Double tsan CPU and Memory to avoid global timeout (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fix #19864
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa8e1487144eab237ffd291397355ef4801f46f8 -- patch looks correct
hebasto:
ACK fa8e1487144eab237ffd291397355ef4801f46f8, according to https://cirrus-ci.org/guide/linux/ the limits are:
Tree-SHA512: b6d522290bfe80ed7453387b811628bf42c7657aa6a84d2f5984c8bb16f9857a71eabc6b8a4d63b84227d59b41a8ed7dd85d86cae5628dc9cf6b85bd365248d7
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: João Barbosa <joao.paulo.barbosa@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can be reviewed with the git diff options
--color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space --ignore-all-space
|
|
fa9ee52556f493e4a896e2570ca1a3102d777d9a doc: Add doxygen comment to IsRBFOptIn (MarcoFalke)
faef4fc9b4990e563022b6ab595cb02c4060c216 Remove mempool global from interfaces (MarcoFalke)
fa831684e54783f6b40533ca218eb7636bdae667 refactor: Add IsRBFOptInEmptyMempool (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The chain interface has an `m_node` member, which has a pointer to the mempool global. Use the pointer instead of the global to prepare the removal of the mempool global. See #19556
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fa9ee52556
darosior:
ACK fa9ee52
hebasto:
re-ACK fa9ee52556f493e4a896e2570ca1a3102d777d9a, since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19848#pullrequestreview-482403942) review:
Tree-SHA512: 11b4c1446f0860a743fdaa67f95c52bf0262d0a4f888be0eaf07ee497448965d32be414111bf016bd568f2989cde923430e3a3889e224057b73c499f06de7199
|
|
networks
86d4cf42d97abf4c436d1eabf29e2ed150f69c1e Increase the ip address relay branching factor for unreachable networks (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Onion addresses propagate very badly among the IPv4/IPv6 network, resulting
in difficulty for those to find each other.
The branching factor 1 is probably so low that propagations die out before
they reach another onion peer. Increase it to 1.5 on average.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 86d4cf42d97abf4c436d1eabf29e2ed150f69c1e -- patch looks correct
naumenkogs:
ACK 86d4cf4
jonatack:
ACK 86d4cf42d97abf4c436d1eabf29e2ed150f69c1e. Code review, built and running with some sanity check logging. `RelayAddress()` is called by `ProcessMessage() ADDR` msg handling, from within the loop while processing each new address to relay it to a limited number of other nodes. According to git blame, the line setting `nRelayNodes` hasn't been touched since 2016 in e736772c56a *Move network-msg-processing code out of main to its own file*, which moved the line but otherwise did not change it. Running a mixed clearnet/onion node with this patch and the logging below, I'm only seeing values of `fReachable 1, nRelayNodes 2`. IIUC, I need to use the settings in `init.cpp` that call `SetReachable(*, false)`. *Edit:* with `onlynet=onion` am now seeing entries of `fReachable 0` with `nRelayNodes` values of 1 and 2.
vasild:
ACK 86d4cf42d
Tree-SHA512: 22391e16d60bcfdec9a9336728da39d68a24a183b3d1b0e8fbc038d265ca6ddf71d16db018f3678745fd9f3e9281049e42197fa0a29124833c50a9170ed6f793
|
|
|
|
ac2ff4fb1e06270cf17727f90599c9f3a55ddd5a refactor: Avoid duplicate map lookup in ScriptToAsmStr (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Simple change that avoids a duplicate (unnecessary) `mapSigHashTypes` lookup.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK ac2ff4fb1e06270cf17727f90599c9f3a55ddd5a
Tree-SHA512: 7e7f5af51c1acd7a42af273e5ee5e2faddd250ba8b8f63ccb3172d95f153ae391b2816b79564b856571af52dc2a767b5736a5d10ffb5cd2c540cd9832bf86419
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: John Newbery <jonnynewbs@gmail.com>
|
|
4294e706909341ab5bf7d99d794434dff5c44a08 rawtransaction: fix argument in combinerawtransaction help message (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Minor correction in the help message provided for `rpc combinerawtransaction`. The input to the rpc is not an array of transaction hashes (txids) but an array of serialized transactions encoded in raw hex.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 4294e706909341ab5bf7d99d794434dff5c44a08
darosior:
ACK 4294e706909341ab5bf7d99d794434dff5c44a08
Tree-SHA512: 81fe7707632574030715a09e4fe1ad7c0e2630be7842f20c6656d908bbc9532fc14e71b6d36e3fc261a347a088491ef9f6f38d7c4173c4a0bbc746e1d625359d
|
|
|
|
CTxMemPool::GetMemPoolParents
|
|
|
|
and `-getinfo`
581b343d5bf517510ab0236583ca96628751177d Add in/out connections to cli -getinfo (Jon Atack)
d9cc13e88d096c1a171159c01cbb96444f7f8d7f UNIX_EPOCH_TIME fixup in rpc getnettotals (Jon Atack)
1ab49b81cf32b6ef9e312a0a8ac45c68a3262f0d Add in/out connections to rpc getnetworkinfo (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is basic info that is present in the GUI that I've been wishing to have exposed via the RPC and CLI without needing a bash workaround or script. For human users it would also be useful to have it in `-getinfo`.
`bitcoin-cli getnetworkinfo`
```
"connections": 15,
"connections_in": 6,
"connections_out": 9,
```
`bitcoin-cli -getinfo`
```
"connections": {
"in": 6,
"out": 9,
"total": 15
},
```
Update the tests, RPC help, and release notes for the changes. Also fixup the `getnettotals` timemillis help while touching `rpc/net.cpp`.
-----
Reviewers can manually test this PR by [building from source](https://jonatack.github.io/articles/how-to-compile-bitcoin-core-and-run-the-tests), launching bitcoind, and then running `bitcoin-cli -getinfo`, `bitcoin-cli getnetworkinfo`, `bitcoin-cli help getnetworkinfo`, and `bitcoin-cli help getnettotals` (for the UNIX epoch time change).
ACKs for top commit:
eriknylund:
> tACK [581b343](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/581b343d5bf517510ab0236583ca96628751177d) on master at [a0a422c](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/a0a422c34cfd6514d0cc445bd784d3ee1a2d1749), ran unit & functional tests and and confirmed changes on an existing datadir ✌️
benthecarman:
tACK `581b343`
willcl-ark:
tACK for 581b343d5bf517510ab0236583ca96628751177d, this time rebased onto master at 862fde88be706adb20a211178253636442c3ae00.
shesek:
tACK `581b343`. This provides what I needed, thanks!
n-thumann:
tACK 581b343 on master at a0a422c, ran unit & functional tests and and confirmed changes on an existing datadir ✌️
Tree-SHA512: 08dd3ac8fefae401bd8253ff3ac027603c528eeccba53cedcb127771316173a7052fce44af8fa33ac98ebc4cf2a2b11cdefd949995d55e9b9a5942b876d00dc5
|
|
020f0519ec66d9626255b938e1c6c3f7f9aa4017 refactor: CTxMemPool::IsUnbroadcastTx() requires CTxMemPool::cs lock (Hennadii Stepanov)
7c4bd0387a01a0c3e2938d530dba3c882e4d8f2b refactor: CTxMemPool::GetTotalTxSize() requires CTxMemPool::cs lock (Hennadii Stepanov)
fa5fcb032b6ed04c49ee465235288b8059fa805e refactor: CTxMemPool::ClearPrioritisation() requires CTxMemPool::cs lock (Hennadii Stepanov)
7140b31b90cbd84d75eedb3e395d0d55f83b5b95 refactor: CTxMemPool::ApplyDelta() requires CTxMemPool::cs lock (Hennadii Stepanov)
66e47e5e506043fbb9b4e487b44bf992985709c9 refactor: CTxMemPool::UpdateChild() requires CTxMemPool::cs lock (Hennadii Stepanov)
939807768acd508932f2efabee660d56324a73df refactor: CTxMemPool::UpdateParent() requires CTxMemPool::cs lock (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This is another step to transit `CTxMemPool::cs` from `RecursiveMutex` to `Mutex`.
Split out from #19306.
Only trivial thread safety annotations and lock assertions added. No new locks. No behavior change.
Refactoring `const uint256` to `const uint256&` was [requested](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19647#discussion_r468471022) by **promag**.
Please note that now, since #19668 has been merged, it is safe to apply `AssertLockHeld()` macros as they do not swallow compile time Thread Safety Analysis warnings.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Core review ACK 020f0519ec66d9626255b938e1c6c3f7f9aa4017.
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 020f0519ec66d9626255b938e1c6c3f7f9aa4017
vasild:
ACK 020f0519e
Tree-SHA512: a31e389142d5a19b25fef0aaf1072a337278564528b5cc9209df88ae548a31440e1b8dd9bae0169fd7aa59ea06e22fe5e0413955386512b83ef1f3e7d941e890
|
