| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7d07192ddeaad28a26e3c4a54757a4f27f2a08ff Add src/qt/android/.gitignore (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR makes `git` ignore files created by `make apk`.
ACKs for top commit:
icota:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22078/commits/7d07192ddeaad28a26e3c4a54757a4f27f2a08ff
Tree-SHA512: 4be20bd84830217a10d8ea7634799e71ed50be73f4f60c91c56311a2c95b22ff1f28d3b7bc077f1417318bb75e446e3fc3bdbf9dbc037b4cbc8428f0875f2c77
|
|
7e2a9890e50969cdfdd08d735fa8f3c611a663a7 depends: latest config.sub (2021-04-30) (fanquake)
f16d4cd8c5412890ee0b73f4ef142b59d130e5d5 depends: latest config.guess (2021-05-24) (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This is split out of #21851. Updating these files should be mechanical, and shouldn't have to wait for that PR. Also, having support in depends for the new `arm-apple-darwin` target (added in [2593751ef276497e312d7c4ce7fd049614c7bf80](https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/config.git/commit/?id=2593751ef276497e312d7c4ce7fd049614c7bf80)) is useful when debugging. i.e #22070.
If you try and compile depends for a `arm-apple-darwin` target using master, on a x86_64 darwin machine, currently you'll get:
```bash
gmake -C depends -j9 HOST=arm64-apple-darwin
Invalid configuration `arm64-apple-darwin': machine `arm64-apple' not recognized
shasum: hosts/.mk: No such file or directory
<omitted>
Makefile:111: hosts/.mk: No such file or directory
gmake: *** No rule to make target 'hosts/.mk'. Stop.
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7e2a9890e50969cdfdd08d735fa8f3c611a663a7
Tree-SHA512: 8ed99b5d486c6cbca8929a752460338b6ee17f6bf93013c76589605678853c3a01ebd631b4d3f5d6aaeb6e5c21b7bbe39afc4454d3a697fafb27678f6d2c021e
|
|
|
|
as the changes that follow are incompatible with the inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
testmempoolaccept
13650fe2e527bf0cf5d977bf5f3f1563b853ecdc [policy] detect unsorted packages (glozow)
9ef643e21b44f99f4bce54077788d0ad4d81f7cd [doc] add release note for package testmempoolaccept (glozow)
c4259f4b7ee23ef6e0ec82c5d5b9dfa9cadd5bed [test] functional test for packages in RPCs (glozow)
9ede34a6f20378e86c5289ebd20dd394a5915123 [rpc] allow multiple txns in testmempoolaccept (glozow)
ae8e6df709ff3d52b8e9918e09cacb64f83ae379 [policy] limit package sizes (glozow)
c9e1a26d1f17c8b98632b7796ffa8f8788b5a83c [fuzz] add ProcessNewPackage call in tx_pool fuzzer (glozow)
363e3d916cc036488783bb4bdcfdd3665aecf711 [test] unit tests for ProcessNewPackage (glozow)
cd9a11ac96c01e200d0086b2f011f4a614f5a705 [test] make submit optional in CreateValidMempoolTransaction (glozow)
2ef187941db439c5b3e529f08b6ab153ff061fc5 [validation] package validation for test accepts (glozow)
578148ded62828a9820398165c41670f4dbb523d [validation] explicit Success/Failure ctors for MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
b88d77aec5e7bef5305a668d15031351c0548b4d [policy] Define packages (glozow)
249f43f3cc52b0ffdf2c47aad95ba9d195f6a45e [refactor] add option to disable RBF (glozow)
897e348f5987eadd8559981a973c045c471b3ad8 [coins/mempool] extend CCoinsViewMemPool to track temporary coins (glozow)
42cf8b25df07c45562b7210e0e15c3fd5edb2c11 [validation] make CheckSequenceLocks context-free (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR enables validation dry-runs of packages through the `testmempoolaccept` RPC. The expectation is that the results returned from `testmempoolaccept` are what you'd get from test-then-submitting each transaction individually, in that order (this means the package is expected to be sorted in topological order, for now at least). The validation is also atomic: in the case of failure, it immediately halts and may return "unfinished" `MempoolAcceptResult`s for transactions that weren't fully validated. The API for 1 transaction stays the same.
**Motivation:**
- This allows you to test validity for transaction chains (e.g. with multiple spending paths and where you don't want to broadcast yet); closes #18480.
- It's also a first step towards package validation in a minimally invasive way.
- The RPC commit happens to close #21074 by clarifying the "allowed" key.
There are a few added restrictions on the packages, mostly to simplify the logic for areas that aren't critical to main package use cases:
- No package can have conflicts, i.e. none of them can spend the same inputs, even if it would be a valid BIP125 replacement.
- The package cannot conflict with the mempool, i.e. RBF is disabled.
- The total count of the package cannot exceed 25 (the default descendant count limit), and total size cannot exceed 101KvB (the default descendant size limit).
If you're looking for review comments and github isn't loading them, I have a gist compiling some topics of discussion [here](https://gist.github.com/glozow/c3acaf161c95bba491fce31585b2aaf7)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 13650fe2e527bf0cf5d977bf5f3f1563b853ecdc
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 13650fe2e527bf0cf5d977bf5f3f1563b853ecdc
ariard:
ACK 13650fe
Tree-SHA512: 8c5cbfa91a6c714e1c8710bb281d5ff1c5af36741872a7c5df6b24874d6272b4a09f816cb8a4c7de33ef8e1c2a2c252c0df5105b7802f70bc6ff821ed7cc1a2f
|
|
167fb1fc72e309587a8ef1d7844cb51a5483f54f Update Windows code signing certificate (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Updates the Windows code signing certificate to a new one issued by Digicert. This certificate has been issued to Bitcoin Core Code Signing LLC registered in Delaware, US. Note that this is different from the previous Bitcoin Core Code Signing Association registered in Zurich, Switzerland as it was unable to meet the validation requirements in time.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 167fb1f
laanwj:
ACK 167fb1fc72e309587a8ef1d7844cb51a5483f54f
Tree-SHA512: 8d5308c710ef94330417955b9bc82c5894d282798cebece82b84b425e3354e566aa6a68693ec359391ea40ddd7e2032d35ce28d104683d75ec3010ddf00be209
|
|
This commit does not change behavior.
|
|
See Qt docs for QAbstractTableModel and QAbstractItemModel classes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass in chainman instead of prev_block so that we can enforce the
block.hashPrevBlock refers to prev_block invariant in the function
itself.
We should probably rethink BlockAssembler's API and somehow include
commitment regeneration functionality in there. Something like a variant
of CreateNewBlock that takes in a std::vector<TxRef> and return a CBlock
instead of CBlockTemplate. That could avoid reaching for
LookupBlockIndex at all.
|
|
This is not the cleanest change but:
1. It fixes the erroneous use of RPC's Ensure*() in rest.cpp, which
cause crashes in REST contexts.
RPC code wraps all calls in a try/except, REST code does not.
Ensure*(), being part of RPC, expects that its throw's will get
caught by a try/except. But if you use Ensure*() in REST code, since
it doesn't have a try/except wrap, a crash will happen.
2. It is consistent with other functions like GetMemPool.
Someone can probably make this a bit prettier.
|
|
|
|
by access type
8caf60dbbe16afa3c52574a7f6710d74c0bfd4ab move-only: Group and re-order CAddrMan members by access type (Hennadii Stepanov)
5cd7f8abe3996d303774b6cddeb419337d605d02 refactor: Do not expose CAddrMan members as protected without need (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is split from #19238 as all of its commits are trivial to review.
The last commit is easy to review with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
Addressed the following comments from #19238:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19238/commits/130b82ff3588d7207c928bda16b96e720e0b24cd#r550865131
> Can you consolidate all the private members and protected members to be next to each other? Multiple private and protected access specifiers make this harder to read than is necessary.
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19238/commits/130b82ff3588d7207c928bda16b96e720e0b24cd#r557271783
> Yeah, class declaration is easier to read if there is just one instance of `public:`, `protected:` and `private:` (in that order).
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 8caf60dbbe16afa3c52574a7f6710d74c0bfd4ab
laanwj:
Code review ACK 8caf60dbbe16afa3c52574a7f6710d74c0bfd4ab
jarolrod:
ACK 8caf60dbbe16afa3c52574a7f6710d74c0bfd4ab
vasild:
ACK 8caf60dbbe16afa3c52574a7f6710d74c0bfd4ab
Tree-SHA512: e6127fc658da7876e36f22e2fae162dc19502ed7f8e931fdebc827dabd627e5346c6fbe6f6d0cd27fd3e5c96690ff35022ff6b48f2747b748ebd66a45c851c2b
|
|
test coverage
e33714557747dd479f123425aa2dd08d272ef377 [fuzz] Occasional valid magic bytes for transport serialization test (Dhruv Mehta)
35571d8d9ec112bd7b6741d10052dded08410c77 [fuzz] Occasional valid checksum for transport serialization fuzz test (Dhruv Mehta)
654472a461bc9d1603c46dcb7a5b2dc87a44045a [fuzz] Add serialization to deserialization test (Dhruv Mehta)
Pull request description:
This PR has 3 commits that increase the fuzz test coverage:
Before commit 1:
```
#306853 REDUCE cov: 798 ft: 5820 corp: 150/375Kb lim: 68333 exec/s: 1382 rss: 461Mb L: 254/63171 MS: 1 EraseBytes-
#1453105 REDUCE cov: 798 ft: 5820 corp: 150/369Kb lim: 79613 exec/s: 1467 rss: 461Mb L: 6027/60873 MS: 1 EraseBytes-
```
After commit 1 (adds serialization to de-serialization test):
```
#303389 NEW cov: 1202 ft: 8382 corp: 157/382Kb lim: 68189 exec/s: 1451 rss: 447Mb L: 1386/65459 MS: 1 CopyPart-
#1428759 REDUCE cov: 1202 ft: 8512 corp: 169/389Kb lim: 78749 exec/s: 1528 rss: 463Mb L: 1627/60488 MS: 1 EraseBytes-
```
After commit 2 (provides an occasional checksum assist to the fuzzer inputs):
```
#304820 NEW cov: 1440 ft: 4452 corp: 92/12551b lim: 2237 exec/s: 3386 rss: 486Mb L: 47/1111 MS: 1 ChangeByte-
#1416181 REDUCE cov: 1442 ft: 5681 corp: 125/59Kb lim: 4096 exec/s: 3522 rss: 535Mb L: 2164/4049 MS: 1 EraseBytes-
```
After commit 3 (provides an occasional magic bytes assist to the fuzzer inputs):
```
#302684 NEW cov: 1454 ft: 3936 corp: 84/7056b lim: 2424 exec/s: 4146 rss: 477Mb L: 65/1108 MS: 3 CopyPart-CrossOver-CMP- DE: "\x0e\x00\x00\x00"-
#1383925 REDUCE cov: 1454 ft: 4828 corp: 102/14573b lim: 4096 exec/s: 3954 rss: 534Mb L: 116/4050 MS: 2 EraseBytes-ChangeByte-
```
If reviewers only accept the first commit, the seeds are not invalidated and new seeds are at: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/pull/61. In this case, we can also revert the test name change.
If reviewers accept all three commits, the existing seeds are invalidated.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Tested ACK e33714557747dd479f123425aa2dd08d272ef377
Tree-SHA512: d37f06eea0249322b00a99c4827359eb53aeb711751e5571f4681eeca06dc257e0c4cd4887150fc37cc2f689e26986112d768066ad274361615ba9b6a522c61a
|
|
|
|
df4c81fda490e556775f6006f3d4f7d54f61073b English translations update (Hennadii Stepanov)
bfb53ddda9a31bbeb8697e65ff9987e61dac136f scripted-diff: Fix ellipsis after pr20773 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Update for Transifex.
After changing translator comments in #332 this update will show if Transifex triggers strings to be re-translated.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK df4c81fda490e556775f6006f3d4f7d54f61073b
jarolrod:
ACK df4c81fda490e556775f6006f3d4f7d54f61073b
Tree-SHA512: 1e54812bc04db6ae39e0b4d735b220ed8730a9941b17a0a2d09e21bcdd08e829adba86c35cf43c9be5e492ccb13e53a90149fcd7d6c0f5fdd022b978a1ff785c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the compiled binaries
cb7eba2a570e7830d53a21b7d534087c00b4cbd7 build: Use Qt archive of the same version as the compiled binaries (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes broken Android APK build when the `depends/sources` directory contains Qt source archives of different versions (e.g., Qt version update [pull request](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22054) in CI with the cached `depends/sources` directory).
This is an alternative to #22058.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK cb7eba2a570e7830d53a21b7d534087c00b4cbd7
laanwj:
Code review ACK cb7eba2a570e7830d53a21b7d534087c00b4cbd7
Tree-SHA512: cf63a9809fba5cb13719d7e7bb5afc718a2cff5233b0670d30d30a0018d91278fcfc2a1b9ae8b84e8e3a52c95157bc465603cc754bb8a9d1a3d62415f01ad70f
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's|_("Loading wallet...")|_("Loading wallet…")|' src/wallet/*.cpp
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
comments
8b7713365134022475e7e5d24d3ca73149bd10e1 qt: Replace disambiguation strings with translator comments (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Since https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21694 is merged, translator comments is the right way to pass context to translators.
This PR fixes changes were made:
- in #220 before https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21694
- in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21694 on testing purpose
- in #125
Closes #288.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 8b7713365134022475e7e5d24d3ca73149bd10e1
Tree-SHA512: 466ade35f4969a41fbf3196780b1ae9fa810bab5d2f09077f8631604636cc63b24a901c719f6b5797366d2aa307993d0aa419ce35200c8d0a741a3d81cad3e6b
|
|
v2 ones
6fe05168587ee818e6ae4483a5984a5893131e44 contrib: add torv3 seed nodes for testnet, drop v2 ones (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Replace the ancient (2015) Tor V2 hardcoded seeds with new Tor V3 ones. This needs to be done before 0.22 to make sure onion-only testnet nodes can still connect to the network. Continues #21560.
Ways to test:
- Re-generate ` src/chainparamsseeds.h` with `cd contrib/seeds && python3 generate-seeds.py . > ../../src/chainparamsseeds.h`, check if git tree stays the same.
- Create a new testnet node with `bitcoind -testnet -onlynet=onion -proxy=127.0.0.1:9050` (or delete `~/.bitcoin/testnet3/peers.dat`), check if it is able to connect to the network and get blocks.
- Check if the addresses are connectable for ex.:
```python3
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import subprocess
with open('contrib/seeds/nodes_test.txt') as f:
for line in (line for line in (line.rstrip().split('#', 1)[0] for line in f) if line):
subprocess.call(["nc", "-v", "-x", "127.0.0.1:9050", "-z"] + line.split(':'))
```
Thanks to jonatack for providing the list.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 6fe05168587ee818e6ae4483a5984a5893131e44
Tree-SHA512: 61bfdb44dfab9d02b75e5cb06c089a3b1a1fe7134875e1d09166c4116e961d809aa25422fe03f068876e9423b571ecc4a0c7a7eeacba4aac3b2768717f3ee6d6
|
|
657b33ef2de77acd1061cdf4d1d64d0e086d75df qt: add translator comments for peers table columns (Jarol Rodriguez)
73a91c63ec72e62ef76fbc857baff14b099a1358 gui: rename "Peer Id" to "Peer" in tab column and details area (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Picking up https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/290
**Original PR Description:**
- renames the peers tab column header from `Peer Id` to `Peer` to allow resizing the column more tightly (this will be particularly useful after #256) and does the same for the peer details area.
While here, we also add Qt translator comments for the Peer Table columns.
| Master | PR |
| ----------- | ----------- |
|  |  |
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
utACK 657b33ef2de77acd1061cdf4d1d64d0e086d75df
hebasto:
re-ACK 657b33ef2de77acd1061cdf4d1d64d0e086d75df
Tree-SHA512: f50116f7ca8719cadf1f95f45e3594b3b92bde9c43eb954f3e963ed10629dd9406efdb5e96aa1f750a926e24a96321d824ed3780bd9cd748774e0b85fd0c9535
|
|
This change makes git ignore files created by `make apk`.
|
|
a02c970eb001b456d74ddc30750fe8b55348ddac qt, refactor: Revert explicit including QStringBuilder (Hennadii Stepanov)
3fd3a0fc87a81d42755246830124833e9ca3f0a9 qt, build: Optimize string concatenation (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
From [Qt docs](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qstring.html#more-efficient-string-construction):
> ... multiple uses of the \[`QString`\] '+' operator usually means multiple memory allocations. When concatenating n substrings, where n > 2, there can be as many as n - 1 calls to the memory allocator.
With this PR
> ... the '+' will automatically be performed as the `QStringBuilder` '%' everywhere.
The change in the `src/Makefile.qt.include` file does not justify submitting this PR into the main repo, IMHO.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a02c970eb001b456d74ddc30750fe8b55348ddac
Talkless:
utACK a02c970eb001b456d74ddc30750fe8b55348ddac, built successfully on Debian Sid with Qt 5.15.2, but did not check if any displayed strings are "wrong" after refactoring.
jarolrod:
ACK a02c970eb001b456d74ddc30750fe8b55348ddac
Tree-SHA512: cbb476ee96f27c3bd6e125efab74d8bf24bbdb4c30576b3feea45e203405f3bf5b497dd7d3e11361fc825fcbf4b893b152921a9efdeaf73b42d1865d85f0ae84
|
|
This commit just moves functions without making any changes. It can be
reviewed with `git log -p -n1 --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`
Motivation for this change is to make wallet.cpp/h less monolithic and
start to make wallet transaction state tracking comprehensible so bugs
in
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Transaction-Conflict-Tracking
can be fixed safely without introducing new problems.
This commit moves wallet classes and methods that deal with transactions
out of wallet.cpp/.h into better organized files:
- transaction.cpp/.h - CWalletTx and CMerkleTx class definitions
- receive.cpp/.h - functions checking received transactions and computing balances
- spend.cpp/.h - functions creating transactions and finding spendable coins
After #20773, when loading is separated from syncing it will also be
possible to move more wallet.cpp/.h functions to:
- sync.cpp/.h - functions handling chain notifications and rescanning
This commit arranges receive.cpp and spend.cpp functions in dependency
order so it's possible to skim receive.cpp and get an idea of how
computing balances works, and skim spend.cpp and get an idea of how
transactions are created, without having to jump all over wallet.cpp
where functions are not in order and there is a lot of unrelated code.
Followup commit "refactor: Detach wallet transaction methods" in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21206 follows up this PR and
tweaks function names and arguments to reflect new locations. The two
commits are split into separate PRs because this commit is more work to
maintain and less work to review, while the other commit is less work to
maintain and more work to review, so hopefully this commit can be merged
earlier.
|
|
e6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729 rpc: Improve avoidpartialspends and avoid_reuse documentation (Fabian Jahr)
8f073076b102b77897e5a025ae555baae3d1f671 wallet: Increase OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #17824.
This increases OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 which means that OutputGroups will now be up to 100 outputs large, up from previously 10. The main motivation for this change is that during the PR review club on #17824 [several participants signaled](https://bitcoincore.reviews/17824.html#l-339) that 100 might be a better value here.
I think fees should be manageable for users but more importantly, users should know what they can expect when using the wallet with this configuration, so I also tried to clarify the documentation on `-avoidpartialspends` and `avoid_reuse` a bit. If there are other additional ways how or docs where users can be made aware of the potential consequences of using these parameters, please let me know. Another small upside is that [there seem to be a high number of batching transactions with 100 and 200 inputs](https://miro.medium.com/max/3628/1*sZ5eaBSbsJsHx-J9iztq2g.png)([source](https://medium.com/@hasufly/an-analysis-of-batching-in-bitcoin-9bdf81a394e0)) giving these transactions a bit of a larger anonymity set, although that is probably a very weak argument.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK e6fe1c37d0
Xekyo:
retACK e6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729
rajarshimaitra:
tACK `e6fe1c3`
achow101:
ACK e6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729
glozow:
code review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18418/commits/e6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729
Tree-SHA512: 79685c58bafa64ed8303b0ecd616fce50fc9a2b758aa79833e4ad9f15760e09ab60c007bc16ab4cbc4222e644cfd154f1fa494b0f3a5d86faede7af33a6f2826
|
|
table model
cafef080a2e59c2bcae6baeee3c3c7e187e931ae qt: Refactor to remove unnecessary block in DispatchNotifications (João Barbosa)
57785fb7f61e51e8a8a459486a594443665ea8c9 qt: Early subscribe core signals in transaction table model (João Barbosa)
c6cbdf1a90a253fef0259b365a782bf88cd437f2 qt: Refactor ShowProgress to DispatchNotifications (João Barbosa)
3bccd50ad2f384e6c8c97c7f44bda7ae0d777696 qt: Set flag after inital load on transaction table model (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This fixes the case where transaction notifications arrive between `getWalletTxs` and `subscribeToCoreSignals`. Basically notifications are queued until `getWalletTxs` and wallet rescan complete.
This is also a requirement to call `getWalletTxs` in a background thread.
Motivated by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20241.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
tACK cafef080a2e59c2bcae6baeee3c3c7e187e931ae
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cafef080a2e59c2bcae6baeee3c3c7e187e931ae. Only change since last review is splitting commits and replacing m_progress with m_loading.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK cafef080a2e59c2bcae6baeee3c3c7e187e931ae
Tree-SHA512: 003caab2f2ae3522619711c8d02d521d2b8f7f280a467f6c3d08abf37ca81cc66b4b9fa10acfdf34e5fe250da7b696cfeec435f72b53c1ea97ccda96d8b4be33
|
|
encoder for fee estimation
66545da2008cd9e806e41b74522ded259cd64f86 Remove support for double serialization (Pieter Wuille)
fff1cae43af959a601cf2558cb3c77f3c2b1aa80 Convert uses of double-serialization to {En,De}codeDouble (Pieter Wuille)
afd964d70b6f7583ecf89c380f80db07f5b66a60 Convert existing float encoding tests (Pieter Wuille)
bda33f98e2f32f2411fb0a8f5fb4f0a32abdf7d4 Add unit tests for serfloat module (Pieter Wuille)
2be4cd94f4c7d92a4287971233a20d68db81c9c9 Add platform-independent float encoder/decoder (Pieter Wuille)
e40224d0c77674348bf0a518365208bc118f39a4 Remove unused float serialization (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Based on #21981.
This adds a software-based platform-independent float/double encoder/decoder (platform independent in the sense that it only uses arithmetic and library calls, but never inspects the binary representation). This should strengthen our guarantee that encoded float/double values are portable across platforms. It then removes the functionality to serialize doubles from serialize.h, and replaces its only (non-test) use for fee estimation data serialization with the software encoder.
At least on x86/ARM, the only difference should be how certain NaN values are encoded/decoded (but not *whether* they are NaN or not).
It comes with tests that verify on is_iec559 platforms (which are the only ones we support, at least for now) that the serialized bytes exactly match the binary representation of floats in memory (for non-NaN).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 66545da2008cd9e806e41b74522ded259cd64f86
practicalswift:
cr re-ACK 66545da2008cd9e806e41b74522ded259cd64f86
Tree-SHA512: 62ad9adc26e28707b2eb12a919feefd4fd10cf9032652dbb1ca1cc97638ac21de89e240858e80d293d5112685c623e58affa3d316a9783ff0e6d291977a141f5
|
|
for named fields
881a3e2e17c5a6fdffb16a47a2eaff9029f261e5 Replace size/weight estimate tuple with struct for named fields (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
For clarity of return values of size estimation functions.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 881a3e2e17c5a6fdffb16a47a2eaff9029f261e5
practicalswift:
cr ACK 881a3e2e17c5a6fdffb16a47a2eaff9029f261e5
Tree-SHA512: 9aa97e3774fcaf1e5b905259418d827051325c2ad76d6c7388ad7c687c605c024a6c5d2f7e9565f4c180ad1a9f6b179557fcb8b23371ff1a4f3b81300ac1f3d1
|
|
building for Android
1be6267ce1ee142c3b90baed1925a82eab6514aa fuzz: don't try and use fopencookie when building for Android (fanquake)
Pull request description:
When building for Android, `_GNU_SOURCE` will be defined:
```bash
/home/ubuntu/android-sdk/ndk/22.1.7171670/toolchains/llvm/prebuilt/linux-x86_64/bin/aarch64-linux-android30-clang++ -dM -E -x c++ - < /dev/null
#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
#define _LP64 1
#define __AARCH64EL__ 1
#define __AARCH64_CMODEL_SMALL__ 1
#define __ANDROID_API__ 30
#define __ANDROID__ 1
#define __ARM_64BIT_STATE 1
.....
```
but it doesn't have the [`fopencookie()` function](https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Streams-and-Cookies.html), or define the `cookie_io_functions_t` type, which results in compile failures:
```bash
In file included from test/fuzz/addition_overflow.cpp:7:
./test/fuzz/util.h:388:15: error: unknown type name 'cookie_io_functions_t'
const cookie_io_functions_t io_hooks = {
^
15 warnings and 1 error generated.
```
Just skip trying to use it if we are building for Android. Should fix #22062.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1be6267ce1ee142c3b90baed1925a82eab6514aa
Tree-SHA512: d62f63d0624af04b76c7e07b0332c71eca2bf9cd9e096a60aea9e212b7bbc1548e9fa9a76d065ec719bb345fe8726619c3bd2d0631f54d877c82972b7b289321
|
|
CI crash
d8f1ea7227260e51c340271fc9a43866799b8ac4 doc: describe in fuzzing.md how to reproduce a CI crash (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Not sure if this is 100% accurate or missing any pertinent info, but I misremembered how to do this today and it seems like useful information to provide.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK d8f1ea7227260e51c340271fc9a43866799b8ac4
Tree-SHA512: 1b74e4187e6ea13b04eb03b3c6e2615c4eb18cc38cce215ad1645f8b135c5c31a243748eb313ccec05f1f62187ba33d550119acf07088968d2d2c1c09bc4c653
|
