Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Pulled from 24.x resource.
Changes to "de", "es_MX" and "nl" have been ignored as they remove
translations altogether.
|
|
maintainers leaving
14fac808bd6c12bce121011bbf50501960c7326f verify-commits: Mention git v2.38.0 requirement (Andrew Chow)
bb86887527d817ee2a015863ddf3541dac42080f verify-commits: Skip checks for commits older than trusted roots (Andrew Chow)
5497c1483097a9b582ef78089a2ce1101b7d722e verify-commits: Use merge-tree in clean merge check (Andrew Chow)
76923bfa09397568fb8eb72142468a986fc6f790 verify-commits: Remove all allowed commit exceptions (Andrew Chow)
53b07b2b47aa3d4ca80fac74e432783a1e724df3 verify-commits: Move trusted-keys valid sig check into verify-commits itself (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the `verify-commits.py` script does not work well with maintainers giving up their commit access. If a key is removed from `trusted-keys`, any commits it signed previously will fail to verify, however keys cannot be kept in the list as it would allow that person to continue to push new commits. Furthermore, the `trusted-keys` used depends on the working tree which `verify-commits.py` itself may be modifying. When the script is run, the `trusted-keys` may be the one that is intended to be used, but the script may change the tree to a different commit with a different `trusted-keys` and use that instead!
To resolve these issues, I've updated `verify-commits.py` to load the `trusted-keys` file and check the keys itself rather than delegating that to `gpg.sh` (which previously read in `trusted-keys`). This avoids the issue with the tree changing.
I've also updated the script so that it stops modifying the tree. It would do this for the clean merge check where it would checkout each individual commit and attempt to reapply the merges, and then checking out the commit given as a cli arg. `git merge-tree` lets us do basically that but without modifying the tree. It will give us the object id for the resulting tree which we can compare against the object id of the tree in the merge commit in question. This also appears to be quite a bit faster.
Lastly I've removed all of the exception commits in `allow-revsig-commits`, `allow-incorrect-sha512-commits`, and `allow-unclean-merge-commits` since all of these predate the commits in `trusted-git-root` and `trusted-sha512-root`. I've also updated the script to skip verification of commits that predate `trusted-git-root`, and skip sha512 verification for those that predate `trusted-sha512-root`.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 14fac808bd6c12bce121011bbf50501960c7326f
glozow:
Concept ACK 14fac808bd6c12bce121011bbf50501960c7326f
Tree-SHA512: f9b0c6e1f1aecb169cdd6c833b8871b15e31c2374dc589858df0523659b294220d327481cc36dd0f92e9040d868eee6a8a68502f3163e05fa751f9fc2fa8832a
|
|
developer docs
84ca5b349ecc2ad083bb39352e5d5ae731fb1622 doc: mention sanitizer suppressions in developer docs (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Should be enough to close #17834.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 84ca5b349ecc2ad083bb39352e5d5ae731fb1622
Tree-SHA512: 233c688a3cef1006c9a00f7b7a52fd6ee0ec150367e5e56904b6f1bbdca21b9217c69f8fcf653a4943613d12c3178a39f761b25eb24fc1954a563cfb1f832f5e
|
|
Should be enough to close #17834.
|
|
trusted-git-root
fab17f08e24f0db687dc25c5e10eb62293070048 Revert "[contrib] verify-commits: Add MarcoFalke fingerprint" (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This reverts commit fa243293343eb964bfee5b91cc52b91f16232ab6.
The commit may be signed by my key, but I haven't checked it. Also, I haven't checked the new `contrib/verify-commits/trusted-git-root`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fab17f08e24f0db687dc25c5e10eb62293070048
glozow:
ACK fab17f08e2
Tree-SHA512: 485fb302f7e42704412afffd6c09a031f63df18f259b27282b8373d5bf95b0ec72426cec476d88bf23e793a6e1dae4c1df2059645961806e34b50448ebf1862a
|
|
e8462690a9ff0b4155c31981fd97be16663ebb35 util: Remove duplicate include (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Duplicate `#include <utility>` is upsetting the linter.
ACKs for top commit:
davidgumberg:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27151/commits/e8462690a9ff0b4155c31981fd97be16663ebb35
theStack:
ACK e8462690a9ff0b4155c31981fd97be16663ebb35
john-moffett:
ACK e8462690a9ff0b4155c31981fd97be16663ebb35
Tree-SHA512: 9e45d8f6a2dd5efcb8eb1c3c440d94b16490dbd63255784cb39863767fa07227e06da112a150ef337ef89e2e305b60b00d5b1c12ff7e1e9c02f6648ed97fac8c
|
|
Duplicate `#include <utility>` is upsetting the linter.
|
|
function
64c105442ce8c10900ea6fbecdbcfebe42f2d387 util: make GetDataDir read-only & create datadir.. (willcl-ark)
56e370fbb9413260723c598048392219b1055ad0 util: add ArgsManager datadir helper functions (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
Fixes #20070
Currently `ArgsManager::GetDataDir()` ensures it will always return a datadir by creating one if necessary. The function is shared between `bitcoind` `bitcoin-qt` and `bitcoin-cli` which results in the undesirable behaviour described in #20070.
This PR splits out the part of the function which creates directories and adds it as a standalone function, only called as part of `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-qt` init, but not `bitcoin-cli`.
`ReadConfigFiles`' behavior is changed to use the absolute path of the config file in error and warning messages instead of a relative path.
This was inadvertantly the form being tested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/73966f75f67fb797163f0a766292a79d4b2c1b70/test/functional/feature_config_args.py#L287), whilst we were _not_ testing that a relative path was returned by the message even though we passed a relative path in as argument.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 64c105442ce8c10900ea6fbecdbcfebe42f2d387
hebasto:
re-ACK 64c105442ce8c10900ea6fbecdbcfebe42f2d387, only comments have been adjusted as requsted since my previous [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27073#pullrequestreview-1307435890).
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 64c105442ce8c10900ea6fbecdbcfebe42f2d387
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 64c105442ce8c10900ea6fbecdbcfebe42f2d387. Only comment changes since last review
Tree-SHA512: b129501346071ad62551c9714492b21536d0558a94117d97218e255ef4e948d00df899a4bc2788faea27d3b1f20fc6136ef9d03e6a08498d926d9ad8688d6c96
|
|
f36d1d5b8934aac60d3097047ecedeb58bae2185 Use void* throughout support/lockedpool.h (Jeffrey Czyz)
Pull request description:
Replace uses of char* with void* in Arena's member variables. Instead,
cast to char* where needed in the implementation.
Certain compiler environments disallow std::hash<char*> specializations
to prevent hashing the pointer's value instead of the string contents.
Thus, compilation fails when std::unordered_map is keyed by char*.
Explicitly using void* is a workaround in such environments. For
consistency, void* is used throughout all member variables similarly to
the public interface.
Changes to this code are covered by src/test/allocator_tests.cpp.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f36d1d5b8934aac60d3097047ecedeb58bae2185
theStack:
Code-review ACK f36d1d5b8934aac60d3097047ecedeb58bae2185
jonatack:
ACK f36d1d5b8934aac60d3097047ecedeb58bae2185 review, debug build, unit tests, checked clang 15 raises "error: arithmetic on a pointer to void" without the conversions here from the generic void* pointer back to char*
Tree-SHA512: f9074e6d29ef78c795a512a6e00e9b591e2ff34165d09b73eae9eef25098c59e543c194346fcd4e83185a39c430d43744b6f7f9d1728a132843c67bd27ea5189
|
|
which sets a maximum value for unspendable outputs.
7013da07fbcddb04abae9759767a9419ab90444c Add release note for PR#25943 (David Gumberg)
04f270b4358417fc2827b9f91717816062b1864e Add test for unspendable transactions and parameter 'maxburnamount' to sendrawtransaction. (David Gumberg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a user configurable, zero by default parameter — `maxburnamount` — to `sendrawtransaction`. This PR makes bitcoin core reject transactions that contain unspendable outputs which exceed `maxburnamount`. closes #25899.
As a result of this PR, `sendrawtransaction` will by default block 3 kinds of transactions:
1. Those that begin with `OP_RETURN` - (datacarriers)
2. Those whose lengths exceed the script limit.
3. Those that contain invalid opcodes.
The user is able to configure a `maxburnamount` that will override this check and allow a user to send a potentially unspendable output into the mempool.
I see two legitimate use cases for this override:
1. Users that deliberately use `OP_RETURN` for datacarrier transactions that embed data into the blockchain.
2. Users that refuse to update, or are unable to update their bitcoin core client would be able to make use of new opcodes that their client doesn't know about.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK 7013da07fbcddb04abae9759767a9419ab90444c
achow101:
re-ACK 7013da07fbcddb04abae9759767a9419ab90444c
Tree-SHA512: f786a796fb71a587d30313c96717fdf47e1106ab4ee0c16d713695e6c31ed6f6732dff6cbc91ca9841d66232166eb058f96028028e75c1507324426309ee4525
|
|
2f84ad7b9e62dd710940c2f265b65973b94864d7 docs: add ramdisk guide for running tests on OSX (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Using a ramdisk on OSX sped up the test suite by about 5x (using default `jobs=4`) on my M1 macbook pro running macOS Monterey 12.3.1. This PR adds the relevant OSX commands following the Linux directions.
Default:
```
8204 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 2104 s
```
following commands from the PR:
```
1606 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 421 s
```
ramdisk + `jobs=32`:
```
2090 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 85 s
```
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 2f84ad7b9e62dd710940c2f265b65973b94864d7
willcl-ark:
ACK 2f84ad7b9e62dd710940c2f265b65973b94864d7
brunoerg:
utACK 2f84ad7b9e62dd710940c2f265b65973b94864d7
Tree-SHA512: 37a9903c8ac2cbfaa91e7e73fc96ef65042ff4b15763d452af7b8615255adf03429ad01cf85265a99dd569290c1d69c05a393d616868c05c190b60b053820786
|
|
.. only in bitcoind and bitcoin-qt
This changes behaviour of GetConfigFilePath which now always returns the
absolute path of the provided -conf argument.
|
|
* Add ArgsManager::EnsureDataDir()
Creates data directory if it doesn't exist
* Add ArgsManager::GetConfigFilePath()
Return config file path (read-only)
|
|
VerifyDB dosn't finish successfully
0af16e7134459e0820ab95d751093876c1ec4c6d doc: add release note for #25574 (Martin Zumsande)
57ef2a4812f443b2d734f43cebf3ef5038da83f2 validation: report if pruning prevents completion of verification (Martin Zumsande)
0c7785bb2540b69564104767d38342704230cbc2 init, validation: Improve handling if VerifyDB() fails due to insufficient dbcache (Martin Zumsande)
d6f781f1cfcbc2c2ad5ee289a0642ed00386d013 validation: return VerifyDBResult::INTERRUPTED if verification was interrupted (Martin Zumsande)
6360b5302d2675788de5c4a28ea77d823f6d809e validation: Change return value of VerifyDB to enum type (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
`VerifyDB()` can fail to complete due to insufficient dbcache at the level 3 checks. This PR improves the error handling in this case in the following ways:
- The rpc `-verifychain` now returns false if the check can't be completed due to insufficient cache
- During init, we only log a warning if the default values for `-checkblocks` and `-checklevel` are taken and the check doesn't complete. However, if the user actively specifies one of these args, we return with an InitError if we can't complete the check.
This PR also changes `-verifychain` RPC to return `false` if the verification didn't finish due to missing block data (pruning) or due to being interrupted by the node being shutdown.
Previously, this PR also included a fix for a possible assert during verification - this was done in #27009 (now merged).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0af16e7134459e0820ab95d751093876c1ec4c6d
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 0af16e7134459e0820ab95d751093876c1ec4c6d. Only small suggested changes since the last review, like renaming some of the enum values. I did leave more suggestions, but they are not very important and could be followups
john-moffett:
ACK 0af16e7134459e0820ab95d751093876c1ec4c6d
MarcoFalke:
lgtm re-ACK 0af16e7134459e0820ab95d751093876c1ec4c6d 🎚
Tree-SHA512: 84b4f767cf9bfbafef362312757c9bf765b41ae3977f4ece840e40c52a2266b1457832df0cdf70440be0aac2168d9b58fc817238630b0b6812f3836ca950bc0e
|
|
c3b4b5a142b204ceeca4e9b1ca1e2ff41ddd1308 test: Replace 0xC0 constant (roconnor-blockstream)
Pull request description:
Instead it should be the named constant `LEAF_VERSION_TAPSCRIPT`.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27143/commits/c3b4b5a142b204ceeca4e9b1ca1e2ff41ddd1308
theStack:
ACK c3b4b5a142b204ceeca4e9b1ca1e2ff41ddd1308
Tree-SHA512: c00be584ea2d0e7c01bf5620da0da1f37e5b5298ef95df48d91d137c8c542f5d91be158d45392cf2ba8874bf27bd12924e2eed395773b49d091e3028de3356a2
|
|
|
|
4bbf5ddd44bde15b328be131922123eaa3212a7e Detailed error message for passphrases with null chars (John Moffett)
b4bdabc2238750a1f6e72cb1403f8b770fc4f365 doc: Release notes for 27068 (John Moffett)
4b1205ba37d6737722d2087696b1a054a852286a Test case for passphrases with null characters (John Moffett)
00a0861181cc7f4771ac2690ca6be5731c30b005 Pass all characters to SecureString including nulls (John Moffett)
Pull request description:
`SecureString` is a `std::string` specialization with a secure allocator. However, in practice it's treated like a C- string (no explicit length and null-terminated). This can cause unexpected and potentially insecure behavior. For instance, if a user enters a passphrase with embedded null characters (which is possible through Qt and the JSON-RPC), it will ignore any characters after the first null, potentially giving the user a false sense of security.
Instead of assigning to `SecureString` via `std::string::c_str()`, assign it via a `std::string_view` of the original. This explicitly captures the size and still doesn't make any extraneous copies in memory.
Note to reviewers, the following all compile identically in recent `GCC` (x86-64 and ARM64) with `-O2` (and `-std=c++17`):
```C++
std::string orig_string;
std::cin >> orig_string;
SecureString s;
s.reserve(100);
// The following all compile identically
s = orig_string;
s = std::string_view{orig_string};
s.assign(std::string_view{orig_string});
s.assign(orig_string.data(), orig_string.size());
```
So it's largely a matter of preference. However, one thing to keep in mind is that we want to avoid making unnecessary copies of any sensitive data in memory.
Something like `SecureString s{orig_string};` is still invalid and probably unwanted in our case, since it'd get treated as a short string and optimized away from the secure allocator. I presume that's the reason for the `reserve()` calls.
Fixes #27067.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 4bbf5ddd44bde15b328be131922123eaa3212a7e
stickies-v:
re-ACK [4bbf5dd](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/4bbf5ddd44bde15b328be131922123eaa3212a7e)
furszy:
utACK 4bbf5ddd
Tree-SHA512: 47a96905a82ca674b18076a20a388123beedf70e9de73e42574ea68afbb434734e56021835dd9b148cdbf61709926b487cc95e9021d9bc534a7c93b3e143d2f7
|
|
49d01f32c9cc4de4fcd0d1f235e2c62e4acfc7a2 kernel: add missing include (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
This syncs the cs_main definition/declaration.
Noticed when experimenting with the external visibility of `cs_main`.
Specifically, this is needed for the following to work as intended:
```c++
__attribute__ ((visibility ("default"))) extern RecursiveMutex cs_main;
```
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 49d01f32c9cc4de4fcd0d1f235e2c62e4acfc7a2
Tree-SHA512: ea0dbcf81959566f949d76c7dcd1e33de53e613519500c863bfb0ac8209665b1c12cff2daa7890d03b76debc4d046339ee7b3231adb71b128e9d5a8fa3132b6c
|
|
3c1de032de01e551992975eb374465300a655f44 i2p: use consistent number of tunnels with i2pd and Java I2P (Vasil Dimov)
801b405f85b413631427c2d8cc1f8447309ea5d8 i2p: lower the number of tunnels for transient sessions (Vasil Dimov)
b906b64eb76643feaede1da5987a0c4d466c581b i2p: reuse created I2P sessions if not used (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
* Reuse an I2P transient session instead of discarding it if we failed to connect to the desired peer. This means we never used the generated address (destination), whose creation is not cheap. This does not mean that we will use the same address for more than one peer.
* Lower the number of tunnels for transient sessions.
* Explicitly specify the number of tunnels for persistent sessions instead of relying on the defaults which differ between I2P routers. This way we get consistent behavior with all routers.
Alleviates: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26754
(I have not tested this with i2pd, yet)
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 3c1de032de01e551992975eb374465300a655f44
mzumsande:
Light ACK 3c1de032de01e551992975eb374465300a655f44
Tree-SHA512: 477b4b9a5755e6a9a46bc0f7b268fa419dff4414e25445c750ae913f7552d9e2313f2aca4e3b70067b8390c2d0c2d68ec459f331765e939fc84139e454031cd4
|
|
4d84eaec82e7b5a450d47cd30e5936a717035f77 Raise PRNG seed log to INFO. (roconnor-blockstream)
Pull request description:
Some build infrastructure, such as Nix, will delete failed builds by default, keeping only the log (stdout/stderr) of the failed build.
For flaky tests, it would be very helpful to have the PRNG seed in the default log in order to redo the failed test.
By simply raising the PRNG seed logging to INFO, we can, by default, record the seed in the log of every build.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 4d84eaec82e7b5a450d47cd30e5936a717035f77
theStack:
ACK 4d84eaec82e7b5a450d47cd30e5936a717035f77
Tree-SHA512: 3ccb4a4e7639a3babc3b2a6456a6d0bffc090da34e4545b317f7bfbed4e9950d1b38ea5b2a90c37ccb49b3454bdeff03a6aaf86770b9c4dd14b26320aba50b94
|
|
passphrase to migratewallet
9486509be65f09174a0cb50a337cac58a0c09de4 wallet, rpc: Update migratewallet help text for encrypted wallets (Andrew Chow)
aaf02b5721a8b5d3d9280dc3146fa5e44ea671b6 tests: Tests for migrating wallets by name, and providing passphrase (Andrew Chow)
7fd125b27d48e410509f3009e2eb9fa5cd6729dd wallet: Be able to unlock the wallet for migration (Andrew Chow)
6bdbc5ff590de18dfb47c31190baad879f68fef7 rpc: Allow users to specify wallet name for migratewallet (Andrew Chow)
dbfa34540372033d95036a02b7025ddd33f540aa wallet: Allow MigrateLegacyToDescriptor to take a wallet name (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`migratewallet` currently operates on wallets that are already loaded, however this is not necessarily required, and in the future, not possible once the legacy wallet is removed. So we need to also be able to give the wallet name to migrate.
Additionally, the passphrase is required when migrating a wallet. Since a wallet may not be loaded when we migrate, and as we currently unload wallets when migrating, we need the passphrase to be given to `migratewallet` in order to migrate encrypted wallets.
Fixes #27048
ACKs for top commit:
john-moffett:
reACK 9486509be65f09174a0cb50a337cac58a0c09de4
pinheadmz:
ACK 9486509be65f09174a0cb50a337cac58a0c09de4
furszy:
ACK 9486509b
Tree-SHA512: 35e2ba69a148e129a41e20d7fb99c4cab7947b1b7e7c362f4fd06ff8ac6e79e476e07207e063ba5b80e1a33e2343f4b4f1d72d7930ce80c34571c130d2f5cff4
|
|
This syncs the cs_main definition/declaration.
Noticed when experimenting with the external visibility of cs_main.
|
|
Instead it should be the named constant `LEAF_VERSION_TAPSCRIPT`.
|
|
creating Miniscript nodes
c1b7bd047f47dcd3eb6897adfaf9a55594deff5d fuzz: avoid redundant dup key checks when creating Miniscript nodes (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
I thought i had done that already in #24149, but it must have slipped through the rebase. It's a 2x speed improvement against the existing corpora and will probably be much more as we extend them with larger nodes.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK c1b7bd047f47dcd3eb6897adfaf9a55594deff5d
Tree-SHA512: 9e6ceb6254183964b6c5538e21ba6321df95a68acb343a15a6ecfef5c51a1980d2627df5aeef9aef1db41656e18cc4f3bc96e6f24314d12fa60368b04a350001
|
|
61bb4e783b3acc62b121a228f6b14c2462e23315 lint: enable E722 do not use bare except (Leonardo Lazzaro)
Pull request description:
Improve test code and enable E722 lint check.
If you want to catch all exceptions that signal program errors, use except Exception: (bare except is equivalent to except BaseException:).
Reference: https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/#programming-recommendations
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 61bb4e783b3acc62b121a228f6b14c2462e23315
Tree-SHA512: c7497769d5745fa02c78a20f4a0e555d8d3996d64af6faf1ce28e22ac1d8be415b98e967294679007b7bda2a9fd04031a9d140b24201e00257ceadeb5c5d7665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since users may have thought the null characters in their
passphrases were actually evaluated prior to this change,
they may be surprised to learn that their passphrases no
longer work. Give them feedback to explain how to remedy
the issue.
|
|
To reflect the change in behavior.
|
|
Add a functional test to make sure the system
properly accepts passphrases with null characters.
|
|
`SecureString` is a `std::string` specialization with
a secure allocator. However, it's treated like a C-
string (no explicit length and null-terminated). This
can cause unexpected behavior. For instance, if a user
enters a passphrase with an embedded null character
(which is possible through Qt and the JSON-RPC), it will
ignore any characters after the null, giving the user
a false sense of security.
Instead of assigning `SecureString` via `std::string::c_str()`,
assign it via a `std::string_view` of the original. This
explicitly captures the size and doesn't make any extraneous
copies in memory.
|
|
needed for rescanning
6a5b348f2e526f048d0b448b01f6c4ab608569af test: test rescanning encrypted wallets (ishaanam)
493b813e171a389a8b6750b4f2e42e8363a0267e wallet: ensure that the passphrase is not deleted from memory when being used to rescan (ishaanam)
66a86ebabb26a055ca92af846bfa39dbd2f9f722 wallet: keep track of when the passphrase is needed when rescanning (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
Wallet passphrases are needed to top up the keypool of encrypted wallets
during a rescan. The following RPCs need the passphrase when rescanning:
- `importdescriptors`
- `rescanblockchain`
The following RPCs use the information about whether or not the
passphrase is being used to ensure that full rescans are able to
take place (meaning the following RPCs should not be able to run
if a rescan requiring the wallet to be unlocked is taking place):
- `walletlock`
- `encryptwallet`
- `walletpassphrasechange`
`m_relock_mutex` is also introduced so that the passphrase is not
deleted from memory when the timeout provided in
`walletpassphrase` is up and the wallet is still rescanning.
Fixes #25702, #11249
Thanks to achow101 for coming up with the idea of using a new mutex to solve this issue and for answering related questions.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6a5b348f2e526f048d0b448b01f6c4ab608569af
hernanmarino:
ACK 6a5b348f2e526f048d0b448b01f6c4ab608569af
furszy:
Tested ACK 6a5b348f
Tree-SHA512: 0b6db692714f6f94594fa47249f5ee24f85713bfa70ac295a7e84b9ca6c07dda65df7b47781a2dc73e5b603a8725343a2f864428ae20d3e126c5b4802abc4ab5
|
|
without spent outputs
95f12de92505522a32ba58acd5251c69e602d160 BIP341 txdata cannot be precomputed without spent outputs (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
In `PrecomputedTransactionData::Init`, if `force` is set to `true`, `m_bip341_taproot_ready` is always set to true, suggesting that all its BIP341-relevant members (including `m_spent_amounts_single_hash`) are correct. If however no `spent` array of spent previous `CTxOut`s is provided, some of these members will be incorrect. This option was introduced in #21365.
That doesn't actually hurt, as without prevout data, it's fundamentally impossible to generate correct BIP341 signatures anyway, and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/f722a9bd132222d9d5cd503b5af25c905b205cdb/src/script/sign.cpp#L71 should prevent the logic from being used anyway.
Still, don't set `m_bip341_taproot_ready` variable when we clearly don't have enough data to compute it.
Discovered by Russell O'Connor.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 95f12de92505522a32ba58acd5251c69e602d160
achow101:
ACK 95f12de92505522a32ba58acd5251c69e602d160
instagibbs:
ACK 95f12de92505522a32ba58acd5251c69e602d160
Tree-SHA512: 90acd2bfa50a7a0bde75a15a9f6c1f5c40f48fb5b870b1bbc4082777e24a482c8282463ef7d1245e53201dbcb5c196ef0386352f8e380e68cdf00c2111633b77
|
|
Some build infrastructure, such as Nix, will delete failed builds by default, keeping only the log of the failed build.
For flaky tests, it would be very helpful to have the PRNG seed in the default log in order to redo the failed test.
By simply raising the PRNG seed logging to INFO, we can, by default, record the seed in the log of every build.
|
|
This reverts commit fa243293343eb964bfee5b91cc52b91f16232ab6.
|
|
Co-authored-by: glozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com>
|
|
sendrawtransaction.
'maxburnamount' sets a maximum value for outputs heuristically deemed unspendable including datacarrier scripts that begin with `OP_RETURN`.
|
|
with avoidpartialspends
14b4921a91920df25b19ff420bfe2bff8c56f71e wallet: reuse change dest when recreating TX with avoidpartialspends (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27051
When the wallet creates a transaction internally, it will also create an alternative that spends using destination groups and see if the fee difference is negligible. If it costs the user the same to send the grouped version, we send it (even if the user has `avoidpartialspends` set to `false` which is default). This patch ensures that the second transaction creation attempt re-uses the change destination selected by the first attempt. Otherwise, the first change address remains reserved, will not be used in the second attempt, and then will never be used by the wallet, leaving gaps in the BIP44 chain.
If the user had `avoidpartialspends` set to true, there is no second version of the created transaction and the change addresses are not affected.
I believe this behavior was introduced in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14582
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 14b4921a91920df25b19ff420bfe2bff8c56f71e
Tree-SHA512: a3d56f251ff4b333fc11325f30d05513e34ab0a2eb703fadd0ad98d167ae074493df1a24068298336c6ed2da6b31aa2befa490bc790bbc260ed357c8f2397659
|
|
`submitpackage` error msg
7554b1fd663fe2010edb0e8a93ab85a6cb10a323 rpc: fix successful broadcast count in `submitpackage` error msg (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
If a `submitpackage` RPC call errors due to any of the individual tx broadcasts failing, the returned error message is supposed to contain the number of successful broadcasts so far:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/4395b7f0845d2dca60f3b4e007ef5770ce8e2aa9/src/rpc/mempool.cpp#L848-L849
Right now this is wrongly always shown as zero. Fix this by adding the missing increment of the counter. While touching that area, the variable is also renamed to better reflect its purpose (s/num_submitted/num_broadcast/; the submission has already happened at that point) and named arguments for the `BroadcastTransaction` call are added.
(Note that the error should be really rare, as all txs have already been submitted succesfully to the mempool. IIUC this code-path could only hit if somehow a tx is being removed from the mempool between `ProcessNewPackage` and the `BroadcastTransaction` calls, e.g. if a new block is received which confirms any of the package's txs.)
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK 7554b1fd663fe2010edb0e8a93ab85a6cb10a323, thanks!
Tree-SHA512: e362e93b443109888e28d6facf6f52e67928e8baaa936e355bfdd324074302c4832e2fa0bd8745309a45eb729866d0513b928ac618ccc9432b7befc3aa2aac66
|
|
to allow inferring descriptors for scripts larger than 520 bytes
73ec4b2a8347c796b9aadc1f2576b286c469f9e7 tests: decodescript can infer descriptors for scripts >520 bytes (Andrew Chow)
7cc78223710679c6e7fd40b762798a1f5ca4938e rpc: Use FlatSigningProvider in decodescript (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`FillableSigningProvider` limits scripts to 520 bytes even though segwit allows scripts to be larger than that. We can avoid this limit by using a `FlatSigningProvider` so that such larger scripts can be decoded.
Fixes #27111
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27113/commits/73ec4b2a8347c796b9aadc1f2576b286c469f9e7
Tree-SHA512: c0e6d21025e2da864471989ac94c54e127d05459b9b048f34a0da8d76d8e372d5472a2e667ba2db74d6286e3e6faa55486ffa9232a068b519afa676394031d5a
|
|
4faa4e37a6511c6ada303ef7929ac99c7462f083 build: use _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
[glibc 2.33](https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2021-February/122207.html) introduced a new fortification level, `_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3`. It improves the coverage of cases where `_FORTIFY_SOURCE` can use `_chk` functions.
For example, using GCC 13 and glibc 2.36 (Fedora Rawhide), compiling master:
```bash
nm -C src/bitcoind | grep _chk
U __fprintf_chk@GLIBC_2.17
U __memcpy_chk@GLIBC_2.17
U __snprintf_chk@GLIBC_2.17
U __sprintf_chk@GLIBC_2.17
U __stack_chk_fail@GLIBC_2.17
U __stack_chk_guard@GLIBC_2.17
U __vsnprintf_chk@GLIBC_2.17
objdump -d src/bitcoind | grep "_chk@plt" | wc -l
33
```
vs this branch:
```bash
nm -C src/bitcoind | grep _chk
U __fprintf_chk@GLIBC_2.17
U __memcpy_chk@GLIBC_2.17
U __memset_chk@GLIBC_2.17
U __snprintf_chk@GLIBC_2.17
U __sprintf_chk@GLIBC_2.17
U __stack_chk_fail@GLIBC_2.17
U __stack_chk_guard@GLIBC_2.17
U __vsnprintf_chk@GLIBC_2.17
objdump -d src/bitcoind | grep "_chk@plt" | wc -l
61
```
Usage of level 3 requires LLVM/Clang 9+, or GCC 12+. Older compilers/glibc will still use _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2. For example, in the glibc we currently use for Linux release builds (2.24), `__USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL` is determined using the following:
```c
#if defined _FORTIFY_SOURCE && _FORTIFY_SOURCE > 0
# if !defined __OPTIMIZE__ || __OPTIMIZE__ <= 0
# warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)
# elif !__GNUC_PREREQ (4, 1)
# warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires GCC 4.1 or later
# elif _FORTIFY_SOURCE > 1
# define __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL 2
# else
# define __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL 1
# endif
#endif
#ifndef __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL
# define __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL 0
#endif
```
so any value > 1 will turn on `_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2`. This value detection logic has become slightly more complex in later versions of glibc.
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2021-February/122207.html
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2021/04/16/broadening-compiler-checks-for-buffer-overflows-in-_fortify_source
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
ACK 4faa4e37a6511c6ada303ef7929ac99c7462f083. After playing with this quite a bit I didn't observe any noticeable pitfalls.
Tree-SHA512: e84ba49e3872c29fed1e2aea237b0d6bdff0d1274fa3297e2e08317cb62004396ee97b1cd6addb7c8b582498f3fa857a6d84c8e8f5ca97791b93985b47ff7faa
|
|
`p2p_disconnect_ban`
1819564c2130d4d8537ca433c6688b56c769fb79 test: fix intermittent issue in `p2p_disconnect_ban` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Fixes #26808
When `node0` calls `disconnectnode` to disconnect `node1`, we should check in `node1` if it worked, because for `node0` the informations in `getpeerinfo` may be updated before really completing the disconnection.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 1819564c2130d4d8537ca433c6688b56c769fb79
Tree-SHA512: 53a386fc38e2faa6f6da3536e76857ff4b6f55e2590d73fe857b3fe5d0f3ff92c5c7e4abd50ab4be250cb2106a4d14ad95d4809ea60c6e00ed3ac0e71255b0b0
|
|
(and `--timeout-factor 0`)
14302a4802e2dbb41f5189de88f99ddd5dda7736 test: fix test abort for high timeout values (and `--timeout-factor 0`) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
On master, the functional tests's option `--timeout-factor 0` (which according to the test docs and parameter description should disable the RPC timeouts) currently fails, same as high values like `--timeout-factor 999999`:
```
$ ./test/functional/wallet_basic.py --timeout-factor 0
2022-08-29T01:26:39.561000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test_f24yxzp5
2022-08-29T01:26:40.262000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/honey/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 549, in start_nodes
node.wait_for_rpc_connection()
File "/home/honey/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 234, in wait_for_rpc_connection
rpc.getblockcount()
File "/home/honey/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/coverage.py", line 49, in __call__
return_val = self.auth_service_proxy_instance.__call__(*args, **kwargs)
File "/home/honey/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/authproxy.py", line 142, in __call__
response, status = self._request('POST', self.__url.path, postdata.encode('utf-8'))
File "/home/honey/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/authproxy.py", line 107, in _request
self.__conn.request(method, path, postdata, headers)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/http/client.py", line 1285, in request
self._send_request(method, url, body, headers, encode_chunked)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/http/client.py", line 1331, in _send_request
self.endheaders(body, encode_chunked=encode_chunked)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/http/client.py", line 1280, in endheaders
self._send_output(message_body, encode_chunked=encode_chunked)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/http/client.py", line 1040, in _send_output
self.send(msg)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/http/client.py", line 980, in send
self.connect()
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/http/client.py", line 946, in connect
self.sock = self._create_connection(
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/socket.py", line 844, in create_connection
raise err
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/socket.py", line 832, in create_connection
sock.connect(sa)
OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument
```
This is caused by a high timeout value that Python's HTTP(S) client library can't cope with. Fix this by clamping down the connection's set timeout value in AuthProxy. The change can easily be tested by running an arbitrary test with `--timeout-factor 0` on master (should fail), on this PR (should pass) and on this PR with the clamping value increased by 1 (should fail).
// EDIT: The behaviour was observed on OpenBSD 7.1 and Python 3.9.12.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 14302a4802e2dbb41f5189de88f99ddd5dda7736
Tree-SHA512: 6469e8ac699f1bb7dea11d5fb8b3ae54d895bb908570587c5631144cd41fe980ca0b1e6d0b7bfa07983307cba15fb26ae92e6766375672bf5be838d8e5422dbc
|
|
When `node0` calls `disconnectnode` to disconnect `node1`, we should check in `node1` if it worked, because for `node0` the informations in `getpeerinfo` may be updated before really completing the disconnection.
|
|
6a5e88e5cf06a6b410486cc36aba7afece0d9da9 miner: don't re-apply default Options value if argument is unset (stickies-v)
ea72c3d9d594b2ea9b3397e64efd08f8563cb400 refactor: avoid duplicating BlockAssembler::Options members (stickies-v)
cba749a9b7a6cd24e8887bddeb0430a1ebc783da refactor: rename local gArgs to args (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Two follow-ups for #26695, both refactoring and no observed (*) behaviour change:
- Rename `gArgs` to `args` because it's not actually a global
- Add `BlockAssembler::Options` as a (private) member to `BlockAssembler` to avoid having to assign all the options individually, essentially duplicating them
Reduces LoC and makes the code more readable, in my opinion.
---
(*) as [pointed out by ajtowns](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26883#discussion_r1068247937), this PR changes the interface of `ApplyArgsManOptions()`, making this not a pure refactoring PR. In practice, `ApplyArgsManOptions()` is never called in such a way that this leads to observed behaviour change. Regardless, I've carved out the potential behaviour change into a separate commit and would be okay with dropping it, should it turn out to be controversial.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK 6a5e88e5cf
TheCharlatan:
Light code review ACK 6a5e88e5cf06a6b410486cc36aba7afece0d9da9
Tree-SHA512: 15c30442ff0e070b1a58dc4c9615550d619ce35b4a2596b2c0a9d790259bbf987cab708f7cbb1057a8cf8b4c3226f3ad981282d3499ac442094806492a5f68ce
|
|
If a `submitpackage` RPC call errors due to any of the individual tx
broadcasts failing, the returned error message is supposed to contain
the number of successful broadcasts so far. Right now this is wrongly
always shown as zero. Fix this by adding the missing counting.
(Note though that the error should be really rare, as all txs have
already been submitted succesfully to the mempool.)
|
|
random
621cfb77227b5a240d66547947f73130f0c51f44 random: consolidate WIN32 #ifdefs (fanquake)
75ec6275e6780b9ed18e271e6b24bef46d1af96d random: remove compat.h include (fanquake)
4dc12816ace11eceee05c1ad24dd925f420a0bda random: use int for MAX_TRIES (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This change is related to removing the use of `compat.h` as a miscellaneous catch-all for unclear/platform specific includes. Somewhat prompted by IWYU-related discussion here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26763/files#r1058861693.
The only reason `compat.h` is required in random.cpp for Windows (note the `#ifdef WIN32`), is for `ssize_t` and an "indirect" inclusion of `windows.h`. I say indirect, because `windows.h` isn't actually included in compat.h either, it's dragged in as a side-effect of other windows includes there, i.e `winsock2.h`.
Remove this coupling by replacing `ssize_t` with int, just including `windows.h` and removing compat.h.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 621cfb77227b5a240d66547947f73130f0c51f44, rebased only since my [recent](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26814#pullrequestreview-1237312144) review. Verified with:
john-moffett:
ACK 621cfb77227b5a240d66547947f73130f0c51f44
Tree-SHA512: 31e1ed2e7ff7daf6c3ee72e6a908def52f7addf8305ba371c5032f1927cbb8ef5d302785e8de42b5c04a123052f04688cc9fd80decceb04738b5d9153f3d32d7
|
|
|
|
|