aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-09-25Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove ↵MarcoFalke
confusing Test_Node.p2p property 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408) 549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408) 7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408) 784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408) Pull request description: The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`. I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests). Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another. The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this: ```py p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface()) ``` A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly. If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself). ACKs for top commit: robot-dreams: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d jnewbery: utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d guggero: Concept ACK 10d61505. Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2020-09-24Fix misleading error message: Clean stack rulesanket1729
Error messages in cleanstack is misleading as it lets the user believe that there are extra elements on stack which is incorrect if the stack is empty.
2020-09-24Improve docs about feeler connectionsGleb Naumenko
2020-09-23doc: Add release notes to support multiple interfacesnthumann
2020-09-23doc: Adjust ZMQ usage to support multiple interfacesnthumann
2020-09-23zmq: Add support to listen on multiple interfacesNicolas Thumann
2020-09-23Merge #19927: validation: Reduce direct g_chainman usageMarcoFalke
72a1d5c6f3834e206719ee5121df7727aed5b786 validation: Remove review-only comments + assertions (Carl Dong) 3756853b15902d63f4b5a3129e8b5d82e84e125b docs: Move FindFilesToPrune{,Manual} doxygen comment (Carl Dong) 485899a93c6f5fff62090907efb0ac938992e1fb style: Make FindFilesToPrune{,Manual} match style guide (Carl Dong) 3f5b5f3f6db0e5716911b3fba1460ce327e8a845 validation: Move FindFilesToPrune{,Manual} to BlockManager (Carl Dong) f8d4975ab3fcd3553843cf0862251289c88c106b validation: Move PruneOneBlockFile to BlockManager (Carl Dong) 74f73c783d46b012f375d819e2cd09c792820cd5 validation: Pass in chainman to UnloadBlockIndex (Carl Dong) 4668ded6d6ea4299d998abbb57543f37519812e2 validation: Move ~CMainCleanup logic to ~BlockManager (Carl Dong) Pull request description: This PR paves the way for de-globalizing `g_chainman` entirely by removing the usage of `g_chainman` in the following functions/methods: - `~CMainCleanup` - `CChainState::FlushStateToDisk` - `UnloadBlockIndex` The remaining direct uses of `g_chainman` are as follows: 1. In initialization codepaths: - `AppTests` - `AppInitMain` - `TestingSetup::TestingSetup` 2. `::ChainstateActive` 3. `LookupBlockIndex` - Note: `LookupBlockIndex` is used extensively throughout the codebase and require a much larger set of changes, therefore I've left it out of this initial PR ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: re-ACK 72a1d5c6f3 👚 jnewbery: utACK 72a1d5c6f3834e206719ee5121df7727aed5b786 Tree-SHA512: 944a4fa8405eecf39706ff944375d6824373aaeea849d11473f08181eff26b12f70043a8348a5b08e6e9021b243b481842fbdfbc7c3140ca795fce3688b7f5c3
2020-09-23Merge #19868: build: Fix target nameMarcoFalke
7a89f2e6c539a54bcaa24bff41aae3910244ad3d build: Fix target name (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: It seems like a typo :) This PR: - fixes errors when building a package in depends for `HOST=x86_64-apple-darwin16` (fix #19799) - is a correct alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19764/commits/d25e0e308f51f6b995e5d0033224c424dc8afc2c from #19764 ACKs for top commit: icota: tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19868/commits/7a89f2e6c539a54bcaa24bff41aae3910244ad3d dongcarl: Code Review ACK 7a89f2e6c539a54bcaa24bff41aae3910244ad3d theuni: ACK 7a89f2e6c539a54bcaa24bff41aae3910244ad3d. Tree-SHA512: a0bcbc6805d3450e201476ef1e22e0eb53903db1586c5515314c19afd337bded887e56de0fbe62feaf359b2de15dbccd49a44f1a8b566b4c64f5ae3d94a2ab6d
2020-09-23Merge #19994: Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (net, ↵MarcoFalke
rpcwallet) fa14f57fbc3c1fa2b9eea5df687f0fb36d452bd5 Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (net, rpcwallet) (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This is the last part split out from #18531 to just touch some RPC methods. Description from the main pr: ### Motivation RPCArg names in the rpc help are currently only used for documentation. However, in the future they could be used to teach the server the named arguments. Named arguments are currently registered by the `CRPCCommand`s and duplicate the RPCArg names from the documentation. This redundancy is fragile, and has lead to errors in the past (despite having linters to catch those kind of errors). See section "bugs found" for a list of bugs that have been found as a result of the changes here. ### Changes The changes here add an assert in the `CRPCCommand` constructor that the RPCArg names are identical to the ones in the `CRPCCommand`. ### Future work > Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue? Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including: * Removing the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant * Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table * Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan * Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks * Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation * Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static ### Bugs found * The assert identified issue #18607 * The changes itself fixed bug #19250 ACKs for top commit: fjahr: tACK fa14f57fbc3c1fa2b9eea5df687f0fb36d452bd5 ryanofsky: Code review ACK fa14f57fbc3c1fa2b9eea5df687f0fb36d452bd5. Just straightforward replacements except code moved in `addnode`, and displatching updated in `bumpfee_helper` Tree-SHA512: e07af150f1d95a88e558256ce197a6b7dc6cd722a6d6c13c75d944c49c2e2441f8b8237e9f94b03db69fa18f9bda627b0781d5e1da70bf5415e09b38728a8cb1
2020-09-23net: Print error message if -proxy is specified without arguments (instead ↵practicalswift
of continuing without proxy server)
2020-09-23Merge #19979: Replace LockAssertion with AssertLockHeld, remove LockAssertionMarcoFalke
0bd1184adf6610c0bd14f4e9a25c0a200e65ae25 Remove unused LockAssertion struct (Hennadii Stepanov) ab2a44297fd0796bf5797ae2a477e8e56d9c3c12 Replace LockAssertion with a proper thread safety annotations (Hennadii Stepanov) 73f71e19965e07534eb47701f2b23c9ed59ef475 refactor: Use explicit function type instead of template (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: This PR replaces `LockAssertion` with `AssertLockHeld`, and removes `LockAssertion`. This PR is compared with alternatives in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/AssertLockHeld-PRs ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK 0bd1184adf6610c0bd14f4e9a25c0a200e65ae25 ajtowns: ACK 0bd1184adf6610c0bd14f4e9a25c0a200e65ae25 vasild: ACK 0bd1184ad Tree-SHA512: ef7780dd689faf0bb479fdb97c49bc652e2dd10c148234bb95502dfbb676442d8565ee37864d923ca21a25f9dc2a335bf46ee82c095e387b59a664ab05c0ae41
2020-09-23Merge #19572: ZMQ: Create "sequence" notifier, enabling client-side mempool ↵Wladimir J. van der Laan
tracking 759d94e70f6844443106404882c7b105f3a4dba7 Update zmq notification documentation and sample consumer (Gregory Sanders) 68c3c7e1bdd00bbe7d70592a8eb39520fa3f87f1 Add functional tests for zmq sequence topic and mempool sequence logic (Gregory Sanders) e76fc2b84d065c9d06010d0a10b316f1f9d36fb9 Add 'sequence' zmq publisher to track all block (dis)connects, mempool deltas (Gregory Sanders) 1b615e61bfc464f215a1b48e6e27d1e8fc16b2d1 zmq test: Actually make reorg occur (Gregory Sanders) Pull request description: This PR creates a new ZMQ notifier that gives a "total hash history" of block (dis)connection, mempool addition/substraction, all in one pipeline. It also exposes a "mempool sequence number" to both this notifier and `getrawmempool` results, which allows the consumer to use the results together without confusion about ordering of results and without excessive `getrawmempool` polling. See the functional test `interfaces_zmq.py::test_mempool_sync` which shows the proposed user flow for the client-side tracking of mempool contents and confirmations. Inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19462#issuecomment-656140421 Alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19462 due to noted deficiencies in current zmq notification streams. Also fixes a legacy zmq test that didn't actually trigger a reorg because of identical blocks being generated on each side of the split(oops) ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK 759d94e70f6844443106404882c7b105f3a4dba7 Tree-SHA512: 9daf0d7d996190f3a68ff40340a687519323d7a6c51dcb26be457fbc013217ea7b62fbd0700b74b654433d2e370704feb61e5584399290692464fcfcb72ce3b7
2020-09-23Merge #19993: refactor: Signet fixupsMarcoFalke
facaf9e61f4b9ea91fab554d495ebea1043d08fb doc: Document signet BIP (MarcoFalke) faf0a26711eed9264113463e56b988cf9fe549fd doc: Update comments for new chain settings (-signet and -chain=signet) (MarcoFalke) fae0548686cb3d095086d3f0fef38dcfcd31d8ca fuzz: Remove needless guard (MarcoFalke) 77771a03df6c5d940b340d15eb88f2ac9a29c13a refactor: Remove SignetTxs::m_valid and use optional instead (MarcoFalke) fa2ad5dae17b237641b8ece0e68ffcdd79d543bf test: Run signet test even when wallet was not compiled (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Some doc and test fixups for #18267 ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK facaf9e61f4b9ea91fab554d495ebea1043d08fb -- code review only dr-orlovsky: Reviewed & ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19993/commits/facaf9e61f4b9ea91fab554d495ebea1043d08fb kallewoof: Code review ACK facaf9e61f4b9ea91fab554d495ebea1043d08fb Tree-SHA512: 8085027c488d84bb4bddccba78bd2d4c5af0d8e2644ee72265f1f30fa8c83f61a961d9da2c796f2940e69682291cbee7b1028b6a6ce123ad9134c0ebbf4723b0
2020-09-22Remove header checks out of net_processingTroy Giorshev
This moves header size and netmagic checking out of net_processing and into net. This check now runs in ReadHeader, so that net can exit early out of receiving bytes from the peer. IsValid is now slimmed down, so it no longer needs a MessageStartChars& parameter. Additionally this removes the rest of the m_valid_* members from CNetMessage.
2020-09-22Give V1TransportDeserializer CChainParams& memberTroy Giorshev
This adds a CChainParams& member to V1TransportDeserializer member, and use it in place of many Params() calls. In addition to reducing the number of calls to a global, this removes a parameter from GetMessage (and will later allow us to remove one from CMessageHeader::IsValid())
2020-09-22Change CMessageHeader ConstructorTroy Giorshev
This commit removes the single-parameter contructor of CMessageHeader and replaces it with a default constructor. The single parameter contructor isn't used anywhere except for tests. There is no reason to initialize a CMessageHeader with a particular messagestart. This messagestart should always be replaced when deserializing an actual message header so that we can run checks on it. The default constructor initializes it to zero, just like the command and checksum. This also removes a parameter of a V1TransportDeserializer constructor, as it was only used for this purpose.
2020-09-22Add doxygen comment for ReceiveMsgBytesTroy Giorshev
2020-09-22Move checksum check from net_processing to netTroy Giorshev
This removes the m_valid_checksum member from CNetMessage. Instead, GetMessage() returns an Optional. Additionally, GetMessage() has been given an out parameter to be used to hold error information. For now it is specifically a uint32_t used to hold the raw size of the corrupt message. The checksum check is now done in GetMessage.
2020-09-22Give V1TransportDeserializer an m_node_id memberTroy Giorshev
This is intended to only be used for logging. This will allow log messages in the following commits to keep recording the peer's ID, even when logging is moved into V1TransportDeserializer.
2020-09-22Merge #19963: Clarify blocksonly whitelistforcerelay testMarcoFalke
e15344889aac50aadee9211ac34e466867d5862b Clarify blocksonly whitelistforcerelay test (t-bast) Pull request description: As discussed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19943, this test may be a bit misleading to newcomers. We underscore the fact that our peer needs to run a modified version of Bitcoin Core to actually relay transactions to a `blocksonly` node and benefit from the `whitelistforcerelay` parameter. ACKs for top commit: naumenkogs: ACK e15344889aac50aadee9211ac34e466867d5862b Tree-SHA512: cc3526ac26c40a2d878b0ad863008663040683fd21092fcdc93866c2b0a79db8c2d29767d1f70bf56195092fca2aa2961cdbee52b5f0b1ae757cece9cd206301
2020-09-22Merge #19959: build: patch qt libpng to fix powerpc buildMarcoFalke
f07fb5a55e2d5d87f288c988a24ae8b9e3f827a1 build: patch qt libpng to fix powerpc build (fanquake) Pull request description: This is an alternative to #19751 that fixes the build without requiring splitting out libpng. This patch can be dropped once we are building qt 5.12.0 or later. One of the [concerns posted in #19751](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19751#issuecomment-675455993) was: > the one bundled with Qt is at best a slower "bare minimum". However for our usage, I don't think the performance of libpng is a concern. If it is, I'd like to see some numbers/justification as to why we should be worried about it. This patch should be enough to unblock PowerPC binaries (combined with other changes) for 0.21.0, and for 0.22.0, when we switch to qt 5.15.x in depends, we should be able to drop it. Related upstream issue: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-66388. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK f07fb5a55e2d5d87f288c988a24ae8b9e3f827a1 theuni: ACK f07fb5a55e2d5d87f288c988a24ae8b9e3f827a1. hebasto: ACK f07fb5a55e2d5d87f288c988a24ae8b9e3f827a1, the patch is the same as https://codereview.qt-project.org/gitweb?p=qt/qtbase.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/3rdparty/libpng/libpng.pro;h=a2f56669b47e09629b7a88a0964091404d6a9b06;hp=577b61d833f7842f3f0d6b1c94a3b3920006695c;hb=dc2aead842f4cdf74f9259d3606c53c8bdae2c6b;hpb=ceeecbae510af6e2d1ebbf865761e4761d404033 Tree-SHA512: 865b843f5049eca80215774274fb7ae0dacccc3dd7f4a2eec93a73057115dcea85e715f919f96441424f9dd902dd97f0a238d96d4074babcee66b30577104009
2020-09-22doc: Document signet BIPMarcoFalke
2020-09-22doc: Update comments for new chain settings (-signet and -chain=signet)MarcoFalke
2020-09-22fuzz: Remove needless guardMarcoFalke
2020-09-22refactor: Remove SignetTxs::m_valid and use optional insteadMarcoFalke
m_valid implies the block solution has been checked, which is not the case. It only means the txs could be parsed. C++17 comes with std::optional, so just use that instead.
2020-09-22test: Run signet test even when wallet was not compiledMarcoFalke
2020-09-22Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (net, rpcwallet)MarcoFalke
2020-09-22Update zmq notification documentation and sample consumerGregory Sanders
2020-09-22Add functional tests for zmq sequence topic and mempool sequence logicGregory Sanders
2020-09-22Add 'sequence' zmq publisher to track all block (dis)connects, mempool deltasGregory Sanders
Using the zmq notifications to avoid excessive mempool polling can be difficult given the current notifications available. It announces all transactions being added to mempool or included in blocks, but announces no evictions and gives no indication if the transaction is in the mempool or a block. Block notifications for zmq are also substandard, in that it only announces block tips, while all block transactions are still announced. This commit adds a unified stream which can be used to closely track mempool: 1) getrawmempool to fill out mempool knowledge 2) if txhash is announced, add or remove from set based on add/remove flag 3) if blockhash is announced, get block txn list, remove from those transactions local view of mempool 4) if we drop a sequence number, go to (1) The mempool sequence number starts at the value 1, and increments each time a transaction enters the mempool, or is evicted from the mempool for any reason, including block inclusion. The mempool sequence number is published via ZMQ for any transaction-related notification. These features allow for ZMQ/RPC consumer to track mempool state in a more exacting way, without unnecesarily polling getrawmempool. See interface_zmq.py::test_mempool_sync for example usage.
2020-09-22zmq test: Actually make reorg occurGregory Sanders
2020-09-22Merge #19849: Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones ↵MarcoFalke
(blockchain,rawtransaction) fa6bb0ce5dba33970e2c1e47ea4d0d2c0718eccb Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (rawtransaction) (MarcoFalke) fa80c814874a2893e4323ba5148fba21d7f421cd Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (blockchain) (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This is split out from #18531 to just touch some RPC methods. Description from the main pr: ### Motivation RPCArg names in the rpc help are currently only used for documentation. However, in the future they could be used to teach the server the named arguments. Named arguments are currently registered by the `CRPCCommand`s and duplicate the RPCArg names from the documentation. This redundancy is fragile, and has lead to errors in the past (despite having linters to catch those kind of errors). See section "bugs found" for a list of bugs that have been found as a result of the changes here. ### Changes The changes here add an assert in the `CRPCCommand` constructor that the RPCArg names are identical to the ones in the `CRPCCommand`. ### Future work > Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue? Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including: * Removing the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant * Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table * Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan * Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks * Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation * Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static ### Bugs found * The assert identified issue #18607 * The changes itself fixed bug #19250 ACKs for top commit: fjahr: utACK fa6bb0ce5dba33970e2c1e47ea4d0d2c0718eccb tryphe: utACK fa6bb0ce5dba33970e2c1e47ea4d0d2c0718eccb. Reducing data duplication is nice. Code changes are minimal and concise. Tree-SHA512: deb0edc3f999baf055526eaa199b98c500635e12502dece7aa3cad5319db330eb5ee7459a5c8f040a83671a7f20c560c19a2026fb76c8416f138aa332727cbce
2020-09-21[doc] Release notesAmiti Uttarwar
2020-09-21[rpc] Deprecate getpeerinfo addnode fieldAmiti Uttarwar
This field is now redundant since the connection type field will indicate MANUAL for addnode connections.
2020-09-21[refactor] Rename test file to allow any getpeerinfo deprecations.Amiti Uttarwar
Simple rename/restructure to allow for upcoming test additions.
2020-09-21[rpc] Add connection type to getpeerinfo RPC, update testsAmiti Uttarwar
2020-09-21[log] Add connection type to log statementAmiti Uttarwar
In addition to adding more specificity to the log statement about the type of connection, this change also consolidates two statements into one. Previously, the second one should have never been hit, since block-relay connections would match the "!IsInboundConn()" condition and return early.
2020-09-22Merge #17785: p2p: Unify Send and Receive protocol versionsWladimir J. van der Laan
ddefb5c0b759950942ac03f28c43b548af7b4033 p2p: Use the greatest common version in peer logic (Hennadii Stepanov) e084d45562b94827b3a7873895882fcaae9f4d48 p2p: Remove SetCommonVersion() from VERACK handler (Hennadii Stepanov) 8d2026796a6f7add0c2cda9806e759817d1eae6f refactor: Rename local variable nSendVersion (Hennadii Stepanov) e9a6d8b13b0558b17cdafbd32fd2663b4138ff11 p2p: Unify Send and Receive protocol versions (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: On master (6fef85bfa3cd7f76e83b8b57f9e4acd63eb664ec) `CNode` has two members to keep protocol version: - `nRecvVersion` for received messages - `nSendVersion` for messages to send After exchanging with `VERSION` and `VERACK` messages via protocol version `INIT_PROTO_VERSION`, both nodes set `nRecvVersion` _and_ `nSendVersion` to _the same_ value which is the greatest common protocol version. This PR: - replaces two `CNode` members, `nRecvVersion` `nSendVersion`, with `m_greatest_common_version` - removes duplicated getter and setter There is no change in behavior on the P2P network. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: ACK ddefb5c0b759950942ac03f28c43b548af7b4033 naumenkogs: ACK ddefb5c0b759950942ac03f28c43b548af7b4033 fjahr: Code review ACK ddefb5c0b759950942ac03f28c43b548af7b4033 amitiuttarwar: code review but untested ACK ddefb5c0b7 benthecarman: utACK `ddefb5c` Tree-SHA512: 5305538dbaa5426b923b0afd20bdef4f248d310855d1d78427210c00716c67b7cb691515c421716b6157913e453076e293b10ff5fd2cd26a8e5375d42da7809d
2020-09-21Merge #18267: BIP-325: Signet [consensus]Wladimir J. van der Laan
8258c4c0076bb5f27efdc117a04b27fcd6dd00b2 test: some sanity checks for consensus logic (Anthony Towns) e47ad375bf17557f805bd206e789b8db78c6338a test: basic signet tests (Karl-Johan Alm) 4c189abdc452f08dfa758564b5381bc78c42d481 test: add small signet fuzzer (practicalswift) ec9b25d046793be50da1c11ba61d1b4b13b295b0 test: signet network selection tests (Karl-Johan Alm) 3efe298dccb248f25d6b01ab6a80b1cd6c9e1a1e signet: hard-coded parameters for Signet Global Network VI (2020-09-07) (Karl-Johan Alm) c7898bca4e1ccbc6edafd3b72eaf80df38e3af32 qt: update QT to support signet network (Karl-Johan Alm) a8de47a1c9033fac3355590f1fe2158a95011bb3 consensus: add signet validation (Karl-Johan Alm) e8990f121405af8cd539b904ef082439261e6c93 add signet chain and accompanying parameters (Karl-Johan Alm) 404682b7cdb54494e7c98f0ba0cac8b51f379750 add signet basic support (signet.cpp) (Karl-Johan Alm) a2147d7dadec1febcd9c2b8ebbbf78dce6d0556b validation: move GetWitnessCommitmentIndex to consensus/validation (Karl-Johan Alm) Pull request description: This PR is a part of BIP-325 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0325.mediawiki), and is a sub-PR of #16411. * Signet consensus (this) * Signet RPC tools (pending) * Signet utility scripts (contrib/signet) (pending) ACKs for top commit: jonatack: re-ACK 8258c4c0076bb5f27efdc117a04b27fcd6dd00b per `git diff dbeea65 8258c4c`, only change since last review is updated `-signet*` config option naming. fjahr: re-ACK 8258c4c laanwj: ACK 8258c4c0076bb5f27efdc117a04b27fcd6dd00b2 MarcoFalke: Approach ACK 8258c4c007 🌵 Tree-SHA512: 5d158add96755910837feafa8214e13695b769a6aec3a2da753cf672618bef377fac43b0f4b772a87b25dd9f0c1c9b29f2789785d7a7d47a155cdcf48f7c975d
2020-09-21Merge #19697: Improvements on ADDR cachingWladimir J. van der Laan
0d04784af151de249bbbcbad51e6e8ad9af8f5a3 Refactor the functional test (Gleb Naumenko) 83ad65f31b5c9441ae1618614082e584854a14e1 Address nits in ADDR caching (Gleb Naumenko) 81b00f87800f40cb14f2131ff27668bd2bb9e551 Add indexing ADDR cache by local socket addr (Gleb Naumenko) 42ec5585424ceb91bed07826dde15697c020661a Justify the choice of ADDR cache lifetime (Gleb Naumenko) Pull request description: This is a follow-up on #18991 which does 3 things: - improves privacy of a node listening to multiple addresses via adding cache index by local socket addr (suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18991#issuecomment-668219345)) - documents on the choice of 24h cache lifetime - addresses nits from #18991 ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK 0d04784af151de249bbbcbad51e6e8ad9af8f5a3 vasild: ACK 0d04784 jonatack: Code review ACK 0d04784 Tree-SHA512: bb65a34dd1ce2811186d3e4469bc33e8399cebaaa494ce13041c7cff23275870e4176a719f7a72f8d779c49f8b2344bf4fa1aeb3ea4e2626d5ae76514f00a750
2020-09-21validation: Remove review-only comments + assertionsCarl Dong
[META] This is a followup to "validation: Move FindFilesToPrune{,Manual} to BlockManager" removing comments and assertions meant only to show that the change is correct.
2020-09-21docs: Move FindFilesToPrune{,Manual} doxygen commentCarl Dong
[META] This is a pure comment commit. They belong in the member declarations in the header file.
2020-09-21style: Make FindFilesToPrune{,Manual} match style guideCarl Dong
[META] This is a pure style commit.
2020-09-21validation: Move FindFilesToPrune{,Manual} to BlockManagerCarl Dong
[META] No behaviour change is intended in this commit. [META] This commit should be followed up by removing the comments and assertions meant only to show that the change is correct. Also stop FindFilesToPrune{,Manual} from unnecessary reaching for ::ChainActive() by passing in the necessary information.
2020-09-21Clarify blocksonly whitelistforcerelay testt-bast
As discussed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19943, this test may be a bit misleading to newcomers. We underscore the fact that our peer needs to run a modified version of Bitcoin Core to actually relay transactions to a `blocksonly` node and benefit from the `whitelistforcerelay` parameter.
2020-09-21net: recognize TORv3/I2P/CJDNS networksVasil Dimov
Recognizing addresses from those networks allows us to accept and gossip them, even though we don't know how to connect to them (yet). Co-authored-by: eriknylund <erik@daychanged.com>
2020-09-20log: Remove static log message "Initializing chainstate Chainstate [ibd] @ ↵practicalswift
height -1 (null)"
2020-09-20Merge #19781: test: add parameterized constructor for msg_sendcmpct()MarcoFalke
638441928a446726ce3a7fb20433a5478e7585bb test: add parameterized constructor for msg_sendcmpct() (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: While working on the test for #19776 I noticed that creating a `sendcmpct` message is quite cumbersome -- due to the lack of a parameterized constructor, one needs to create an empty (that is, initialized with default values) object and then set the two fields one by one. This PR replaces the default constructor with a parameterized constructor and uses it in the test `p2p_compactblocks.py`, reducing LOC. No need to pollute the namespace with temporary throw-away message objects anymore. ACKs for top commit: guggero: Code review ACK 638441928a446726ce3a7fb20433a5478e7585bb. epson121: Code review ACK 638441928a446726ce3a7fb20433a5478e7585bb Tree-SHA512: 3b58d276d714b73abc6cc98d1d52dec5f6026b33f03faaeb7dcbc5d83ac377555179f98b159b2b9ecc8957999c35a1dc082e3c69299c5fde4e35f1bd0587ce9d
2020-09-20Merge #18949: doc: Add CODEOWNERS file to automatically nominate PR reviewersMarcoFalke
a06eb03ded1a70879db86a03c2d6831e2ed75f62 doc: Add comments and additional reviewers to CODEOWNERS file (Adam Jonas) e02da2290619553f6fba67d8584cb1a49414bc87 doc: Add CODEOWNERS file (Wladimir J. van der Laan) Pull request description: This PR brings back and builds on #17094. GitHub uses a CODEOWNERS magic file to automatically add tagged contributors to the "Reviewers" list for a PR. The goal of this is to make use of GitHub's suggested reviewers feature and not to confer ownership or give veto power to specific people. It would be better if this file could be named CODEREVIEWERS, but alas, that wouldn't work. The idea of a NAGFILE was proposed in [Bitcoin Core Dev meeting in 2018](https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2018-03-07-priorities/#:~:text=NAGFILE). While this GitHub implementation has some complications, it's a step towards realizing the promise of automating "reviewing begging" and (hopefully) positively impacting the review process as a whole. Of secondary value, this file can serve as documentation for who the maintainers are and who it might be smart to check with for certain areas of code/features (i.e., fuzzing, PSBT, and Bech32) -- this is helpful information for new contributors. * The first commit is taken from #17094 * The second commit adds comments and expands the list of reviewers based on the suggestions and comments from that PR * ~The third WIP commit~ This commit also uses the doc dir as an example of granular assignments based on lines of codes ~contributed~ written and/or general engagement with the project. (If interested, here is a report for [most lines of code per author for each file](https://gist.github.com/adamjonas/854a46a1918224927b186865baeac411)). The pro of this level of detail is that the best reviewer is more likely to be nominated. The con is that it will create churn as files are renamed, new files are added, or reviewers want to be added or removed. Some open questions: * How often should this file be changed? * What level of history does one need have on the project before being added to this file? When does it make sense to remove a reviewer? * These review notifications can [cause a lot of noise](https://github.community/t5/How-to-use-Git-and-GitHub/Team-based-notifications-or-rework-CODEOWNERS-notification/td-p/7811) and automatically subscribes the requested reviewer to the thread. A GitHub Team based approach would allow for adding or removing reviewers without modifying this file; however, this comes along with its [own set of problems](https://bionic.fullstory.com/taming-github-codeowners-with-bots/#problems-with-github-code-owners), including granting [write access](https://github.community/t5/How-to-use-Git-and-GitHub/CODEOWNERS-works-with-users-but-not-teams/td-p/4986#U4991). Other projects [have used bots](https://bionic.fullstory.com/taming-github-codeowners-with-bots/#using-a-github-bot) to sidestep this. Top commit has no ACKs. Tree-SHA512: aa674ac62478b8801f48750df869c802070dc83d0fa9ff93596e9d63406129d7fd3c0daeb35d7a1a259554d045c24746a6808878a7b9867c7ed66d251f0c918f
2020-09-19Remove unused LockAssertion structHennadii Stepanov
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2025-03-18 15:31:43 +0000