aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-11-16refactor: Include obj/build.h instead of build.hWladimir J. van der Laan
2017-11-16test: refactor: Use absolute include paths for test data filesWladimir J. van der Laan
2017-11-16qt: refactor: Changes to make include paths absoluteWladimir J. van der Laan
This makes all include paths in the GUI absolute. Many changes are involved as every single source file in src/qt/ assumes to be able to use relative includes.
2017-11-16build: Remove -I for everything but project rootWladimir J. van der Laan
Remove -I from build system for everything but the project root, and built-in dependencies.
2017-11-16qt: refactor: Use absolute include paths in .ui filesWladimir J. van der Laan
2017-11-16scripted-diff: Replace #include "" with #include <> (ryanofsky)MeshCollider
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- for f in \ src/*.cpp \ src/*.h \ src/bench/*.cpp \ src/bench/*.h \ src/compat/*.cpp \ src/compat/*.h \ src/consensus/*.cpp \ src/consensus/*.h \ src/crypto/*.cpp \ src/crypto/*.h \ src/crypto/ctaes/*.h \ src/policy/*.cpp \ src/policy/*.h \ src/primitives/*.cpp \ src/primitives/*.h \ src/qt/*.cpp \ src/qt/*.h \ src/qt/test/*.cpp \ src/qt/test/*.h \ src/rpc/*.cpp \ src/rpc/*.h \ src/script/*.cpp \ src/script/*.h \ src/support/*.cpp \ src/support/*.h \ src/support/allocators/*.h \ src/test/*.cpp \ src/test/*.h \ src/wallet/*.cpp \ src/wallet/*.h \ src/wallet/test/*.cpp \ src/wallet/test/*.h \ src/zmq/*.cpp \ src/zmq/*.h do base=${f%/*}/ relbase=${base#src/} sed -i "s:#include \"\(.*\)\"\(.*\):if test -e \$base'\\1'; then echo \"#include <\"\$relbase\"\\1>\\2\"; else echo \"#include <\\1>\\2\"; fi:e" $f done -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2017-11-15Merge #10600: Make feebumper class statelessMarcoFalke
aed1d90ac [wallet] Change feebumper from class to functions (Russell Yanofsky) 37bdcca3c [refactor] Make feebumper namespace (Russell Yanofsky) 7c4f00919 [trivial] Rename feebumper variables according to project code style (Russell Yanofsky) Pull request description: Make feebumper methods static and remove stored state in the class. Having the results of feebumper calls persist in an object makes process separation between Qt and wallet awkward, because it means the feebumper object either has to be serialized back and forth between Qt and wallet processes between fee bump calls, or that the feebumper object needs to stay alive in the wallet process with an object reference passed back to Qt. It's simpler just to have fee bumper calls return their results immediately instead of storing them in an object with an extended lifetime. In addition to making feebumper methods static, also: - Move LOCK calls from Qt code to feebumper - Move TransactionCanBeBumped implementation from Qt code to feebumper - Rename CFeeBumper class to FeeBumper (every CFeeBumper reference had to be updated in this PR anyway so this doesn't increase the size of the diff) This change was originally part of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10244 Tree-SHA512: bf75e0c741b4e9c8912e66cc1dedf0ff715f77ea65fc33f7020d97d9099b0f6448f5852236dac63eea649de7d6fc03b0b21492e2c5140fb7560a39cf085506fd
2017-11-15Merge #10286: Call wallet notify callbacks in scheduler thread (without cs_main)Wladimir J. van der Laan
89f0312 Remove redundant pwallet nullptr check (Matt Corallo) c4784b5 Add a dev notes document describing the new wallet RPC blocking (Matt Corallo) 3ea8b75 Give ZMQ consistent order with UpdatedBlockTip on scheduler thread (Matt Corallo) cb06edf Fix wallet RPC race by waiting for callbacks in sendrawtransaction (Matt Corallo) e545ded Also call other wallet notify callbacks in scheduler thread (Matt Corallo) 17220d6 Use callbacks to cache whether wallet transactions are in mempool (Matt Corallo) 5d67a78 Add calls to CWallet::BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain() in RPCs (Matt Corallo) 5ee3172 Add CWallet::BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain() (Matt Corallo) 0b2f42d Add CallFunctionInQueue to wait on validation interface queue drain (Matt Corallo) 2b4b345 Add ability to assert a lock is not held in DEBUG_LOCKORDER (Matt Corallo) 0343676 Call TransactionRemovedFromMempool in the CScheduler thread (Matt Corallo) a7d3936 Add a CValidationInterface::TransactionRemovedFromMempool (Matt Corallo) Pull request description: Based on #10179, this effectively reverts #9583, regaining most of the original speedups of #7946. This concludes the work of #9725, #10178, and #10179. See individual commit messages for more information. Tree-SHA512: eead4809b0a75d1fb33b0765174ff52c972e45040635e38cf3686cef310859c1e6b3c00e7186cbd17374c6ae547bfbd6c1718fe36f26c76ba8a8b052d6ed7bc9
2017-11-15Merge #11655: net: Assert state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header in ConsiderEvictionWladimir J. van der Laan
63c2d83 Explicitly state assumption that state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr in ConsiderEviction (practicalswift) Pull request description: Explicitly state assumption that `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr` in `ConsiderEviction(…)`. Static analyzer (and humans!) will see the null-check in ... ``` else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout == 0 || (state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr && ... ``` ... and infer that `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header` might be set to `nullptr` when reaching `else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout > 0 && time_in_seconds > state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout)` and thus flag `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->GetBlockHash().ToString()` as a potential null pointer dereference. This commit makes the tacit assumption of `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr` explicit. Code introduced in 5a6d00c6defc587e22c93e63029fdd538ce8858d ("Permit disconnection of outbound peers on bad/slow chains") which was merged into master four days ago. Friendly ping @sdaftuar :-) Tree-SHA512: 32e5631025b7ba7556a02c89d040fbe339c482a03f28d0dbc9871c699e1f8ac867619b89c5fd41fdcfcf0dc4d7c859295b26ccd988572145cc244261aec18ce9
2017-11-14Merge #11680: [docs] Add instructions for lcov report generationJonas Schnelli
5ff01c236 [docs] Add instructions for lcov coverage report generation (James O'Beirne) Pull request description: After rediscovering the `lcov` report generation recipe one too many times, it seemed prudent to write some doc. Tree-SHA512: 20e1b5f51ecd39e14bd67986a2c1578fb7da03a50625366eaca35b201db66aef99cd4a5456df3aaca5d2d66b18ed7d2e8eb8f3bd9c7aaf9af48164d9bac38931
2017-11-14[docs] Add instructions for lcov coverage report generationJames O'Beirne
2017-11-14Merge #11677: qa: Remove unused NodeConn membersMarcoFalke
fafdad0d4 qa: Remove unused NodeConn members (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: * `ver_send` and `ver_recv` were completely unused * `rpc` was only used once, in p2p-segwit. Imo better only pass it to the constructor in that single test Tree-SHA512: 7f85554d6d0fd2096516ca3c608811d5370da66cde35d8031bdc921607a7a4efdb26355896012f75f713f8df09e28d46ba46be69fd96a5898fabb1a25cbcb8ad
2017-11-14Merge #11684: trivial: Fix typo – "Ubutntu" → "Ubuntu"Wladimir J. van der Laan
d8ac893 trivial: Fix typo – "Ubutntu" → "Ubuntu" (practicalswift) Pull request description: Fix typo – "Ubutntu" → "Ubuntu". Tree-SHA512: 80441cc5bf8b3547c8e5d923cac24af6869d12a626c59f2e7573dd0652e540f8bdb32def318523d84e2856a3c8a32797f761092bfdcdc2600b30d603cdfa2ce7
2017-11-14trivial: Fix typo – "Ubutntu" → "Ubuntu"practicalswift
2017-11-14Merge #11641: qa: Only allow disconnecting all NodeConnsWladimir J. van der Laan
faaa7db qa: Only allow disconnecting all NodeConns (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Disconnecting the connection with `index=0` makes no sense when there are more than one connections, as the list "rotates around" and populates index 0 after `del`. Just disconnect all NodeConns in any case. Tree-SHA512: e5cf540823fccb31634b5a11501f54222be89862e80ccafc28bc06726480f8d2153b8c1b6f859fa6a6d087876251d48a6c6035bccdaaf16831e300bc17ff613d
2017-11-14Merge #11533: Docs: Update WSL installation notes for Fall Creators updateWladimir J. van der Laan
73a7e6d Update WSL installation for Fall Creators update (Thoragh) Pull request description: Fall Creators update (RS3) was released 17 October and it has made some changes to the installation of WSL (no longer requires Developer Mode, out of beta and Ubuntu has to be installed from the Store). Tree-SHA512: 65073dc787e249959ae6374bfb448fceb17fb2b85ddaaf198e37f7af5ecd905a896294a0acb0a16fe13a78e3fc4c0a3f8ae2637c01912d50ba8f8ece7e897208
2017-11-14Update WSL installation for Fall Creators updateThoragh
2017-11-13qa: Remove unused NodeConn membersMarcoFalke
2017-11-13Merge #11676: contrib/init: Update openrc-run filenameMarcoFalke
2f041f0e7 contrib/init: Update openrc-run filename (Luke Dashjr) Pull request description: OpenRC changed their program binary names in 2014 (3 years ago), and using the old names has loud warnings now Tree-SHA512: 2b81802b21c32b8df6010142f9593c0b6cc814a052f83b7f5654f6885566e8dbcaf4da772145fa2cf5d94c16c2fb488c5d4879f71021407c4d7b3a3b7e7ed21e
2017-11-13qa: Only allow disconnecting all NodeConnsMarcoFalke
2017-11-13Merge #11663: [trivial] doc: Add getreceivedbyaddress release notesMarcoFalke
fa0c7c7f8 doc: Add getreceivedbyaddress release notes (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: C.f. #11055 Also, remove release note snippets of previous versions. Tree-SHA512: 3ec0722d2f69b24fdaddb65e3a602ffb79b986ae6910425d6c3639e250b88432885ac4cc738ec395ac80551e73dfc2cd59b2d2b6645c3986b97c4046ead27cbc
2017-11-13contrib/init: Update openrc-run filenameLuke Dashjr
OpenRC changed their program binary names in 2014 (3 years ago), and using the old names has loud warnings now
2017-11-13Merge #11035: [contrib] Add Valgrind suppressions fileWladimir J. van der Laan
4a426d8 Add note about Valgrind suppressions file in developer-notes.md (practicalswift) 84e2462 contrib: Add Valgrind suppressions file (practicalswift) Pull request description: Includes known Valgrind warnings in our dependencies that cannot be fixed in-tree. Example use: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp src/test/test_bitcoin $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full \ --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite ``` Running with the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10769== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10769== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10769== suppressed: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ``` Running without the suppressions file under Ubuntu 16.04: ``` $ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_crypto … ==10724== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1 ==10724== at 0x4C2DBF6: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299) ==10724== by 0x6F74EFF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21) ==10724== by 0x40106B9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) ==10724== by 0x40107CA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) ==10724== by 0x4000C69: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) ==10724== by 0x2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006D2: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006E8: ??? ==10724== by 0x1FFF0006FF: ??? ==10724== ==10724== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10724== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==10724== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ==10724== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ``` Tree-SHA512: 9c92079fc61313ea678deb6aaa16a3a71c3154c757459793eb9ca0d90a9a74c6faebfb04c9135e1b398ca34224fb7f03bd9c488ea0e8debf6894f69f030a31d3
2017-11-13Merge #11438: Updated Windows build doc for WSL/Xenial workaroundWladimir J. van der Laan
7383d77 Updated instructions for Windows 10 Fall Creators Update. (Aaron Clauson) e0fc4a7 Updated Windows build doc for WSL/Xenial workarounds. (Aaron Clauson) Pull request description: An update to the Windows build document that provides workarounds for the broken 64 bit mingw32 cross compiler on WSL/Xenial. This update is an alternative to pull request #11437. While that pull request takes a valid approach by stating building on WSL should be avoided I think it is more useful to give Windows developers a workaround option. The instructions have been tested on: - Ubuntu 14.04 and 64 bit mingw32 tool chain - Ubuntu 16.04 and 64 bit mingw32 tool chain - Ubuntu 17.04 and 64 bit mingw32 tool chain - Windows Subsystem for Linux (Windows 10 OS Build 15063.608) and 32 bit mingw32 tool chain - Windows Subsystem for Linux (Windows 10 OS Build 15063.608) and 64 bit mingw32 tool chain Related items: - Serious incompatibility problems w/ newer mingw-64 on Ubuntu #8653 - `-fstack-protector-all` triggers crashes in mingw-w64 5.3.1 #8732 - Windows build appears broken on WSL (buntu okay) #10269 - Compilation error for windows target #11437 Tree-SHA512: 7c937e37ed7120ae5dcf61aba50e5228a7ed6f729647c724b8f48e7cbbd81366c1a83a818618766a8fe0418425e05ba2eba2b14f2616621c58606585444f45fc
2017-11-12Add note about Valgrind suppressions file in developer-notes.mdpracticalswift
2017-11-11Merge #10749: Use compile-time constants instead of unnamed enumerations ↵MarcoFalke
(remove "enum hack") 1e65f0f33 Use compile-time constants instead of unnamed enumerations (remove "enum hack") (practicalswift) Pull request description: Use compile-time constants instead of unnamed enumerations (remove "enum hack"). Tree-SHA512: 1b6ebb2755398c5ebab6cce125b1dfc39cbd1504d98d55136b32703fe935c4070360ab3b2f52b1da48ba9f3b01082d204f3d87c92ccb5c8c333731f7f972e128
2017-11-11Merge #3716: GUI: Receive: Remove option to reuse a previous addressMarcoFalke
927f4ff5a GUI: Receive: Remove option to reuse a previous address (Luke Dashjr) Pull request description: This was justified by the need to "resent" an invoice, but now that we have the request history, that need should be gone. Tree-SHA512: 4ade4eb84a21bbbd8dcc3a2c9580d416e113284b5bdf350c22051c233101fe0ee31659c54a7a46e7136f9c999acb61efbbb3f97aeb2fa7b2b1e1daec02ca0837
2017-11-11doc: Add getreceivedbyaddress release notesMarcoFalke
Also, remove release note snippets of previous versions.
2017-11-11Merge #11055: [wallet] [rpc] getreceivedbyaddress should return error if ↵MarcoFalke
called with address not owned by the wallet 5e0ba8f8c [wallet] getreceivedbyaddress should return error if address is not mine (John Newbery) ea0cd24f7 [tests] Tidy up receivedby.py (John Newbery) Pull request description: Two commits: - First commit tidies up the `receivedby.py` test (and speeds it up by factor of two) - Second commit changes getreceivedbyaddress to return error if the address is not found in wallet, and adds test to `receivedby.py` Tree-SHA512: e41342dcbd037a6b440cbe4ecd3b8ed589e18e477333f0d866f3564e948e0f5231e497d5ffb66da4e6680eb772d9f0cf839125098bb68b92d04a5ee35c6c0a81
2017-11-11doc: Add historical release notes for 0.15.1Wladimir J. van der Laan
Tree-SHA512: 83d1b5c392ada61c846ece98e5060ead8b79989a024d241ade20b607af3651a832f59adc73d34771b4e9ec573315cb19ea20743d7d7d88dbbec0e60b2ca81729
2017-11-11GUI: Receive: Remove option to reuse a previous addressLuke Dashjr
This was justified by the need to "resent" an invoice, but now that we have the request history, that need should be gone.
2017-11-10Merge #11258: [rpc] Add initialblockdownload to getblockchaininfoPieter Wuille
11413646b [trivial] (whitespace only) fix getblockchaininfo alignment (John Newbery) bd9c18171 [rpc] Add initialblockdownload to getblockchaininfo (John Newbery) Pull request description: Exposing whether the node is in IBD would help for testing, and may be useful in general, particularly for developers. First discussed in #10357 here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10357#pullrequestreview-59963870 > ... we could simplify this (and possibly other) tests by just adding a way to know if a node is in IBD. I'd like to do that, but I'm not sure it makes sense to complicate this PR with discussion over how that information should be made available. Eg it's not clear to me that the notion of being in IBD is worth exposing to the casual user, versus a hidden rpc call or something, since the definition has changed over time, and may continue to change in the future. But I still do agree that at least for testing purposes it would be far simpler to expose the field somehow... This PR currently implements the simplest way of doing this: adding an `initialblockdownload` field to `getblockchaininfo`. Other approaches we could take: 1. add a new debug RPC method that exposes `IBD` and potentially other information. 2. add a parameter to `getblockchaininfo`, eg `debug_info`, which would cause it to return debug information including IBD 3. add a query string to the url `?debug=true` which would cause RPCs to return additional debug information. I quite like the idea of (3). Feedback on these and other approaches very much welcomed! @sdaftuar @laanwj Tree-SHA512: a6dedd47f8c9bd38769cc597524466250041136feb33500644b9c48d0ffe4e3eeeb2587b5bbc6420364ebdd2667df807fbb50416f9a7913bbf11a14ea86dc0d4
2017-11-10[wallet] Change feebumper from class to functionsRussell Yanofsky
Change feebumper from a stateful class into a namespace of stateless functions. Having the results of feebumper calls persist in an object makes process separation between Qt and wallet awkward, because it means the feebumper object either has to be serialized back and forth between Qt and wallet processes between fee bump calls, or that the feebumper object needs to stay alive in the wallet process with an object reference passed back to Qt. It's simpler just to have fee bumper calls return their results immediately instead of storing them in an object with an extended lifetime. In addition to making feebumper stateless, also: - Move LOCK calls from Qt code to feebumper - Move TransactionCanBeBumped implementation from Qt code to feebumper
2017-11-10[refactor] Make feebumper namespaceRussell Yanofsky
Future commit will remove the FeeBumper class. This commit simply places everything into a feebumper namespace, and changes the enum class name from BumpeFeeResult to feebumper::Result.
2017-11-10[trivial] Rename feebumper variables according to project code styleRussell Yanofsky
Future PRs will completely refactor this translation unit and touch all this code so we rename the variables to follow project stlye guidelines in this preparation commit. Don't use m_ prefixes for member variables since we're going to remove the class entirely in the next commits.
2017-11-10[wallet] getreceivedbyaddress should return error if address is not mineJohn Newbery
2017-11-10Merge #11269: [Mempool] CTxMemPoolEntry::UpdateAncestorState: modifySiagOps ↵MarcoFalke
param type 203a4aa31 Fix CTxMemPoolEntry::UpdateAncestorState: modifySigOps param type int -> int64_t (donaloconnor) Pull request description: CTxMemPoolEntry::CTxMemPoolEntry's modifySigOps parameter is int while update_ancestor_state::modifySigOpsCost is int64_t. This issue was raised in #11165. It looks like the function paramaters were not changed in commit 72abd2c This will avoid unexpected truncation of int64_t -> int Tree-SHA512: 314c703f217e104336456859066d18fb0d12c4f9f32835e17490a6f29eb05951184095039e4e57edacef8ad35dd75c6d97d9af656a52209dd0c3779b4ffa0914
2017-11-10[tests] Tidy up receivedby.pyJohn Newbery
- Fix flake8 warnings - Remove the useless get_sub_array_from_array() function - Reduce runtime for receivedby.py by about half by only using two nodes
2017-11-10Merge #11353: Small refactor of CCoinsViewCache::BatchWrite()MarcoFalke
5b9748f97 Small refactor of CCoinsViewCache::BatchWrite() (Dan Raviv) Pull request description: `std::unordered_map::erase( const_iterator pos )` returns an iterator to the element following the removed one. Use that to optimize (probably minor-performance-wise, and definitely code-structure-wise) the implementation of `CCoinsViewCache::BatchWrite()`. Tree-SHA512: 00abc838ad91771cfcddd45688841c9414869b75289d09b483a7f0ba835614fe189e9c8aca8a80e3de78ee397ec14083ae52e2e92b7863b3b6eb0d0cb892c9dd
2017-11-10Merge #11623: tests: Add missing locks to testsMarcoFalke
109a85899 tests: Add missing locks to tests (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add missing locks to tests to satisfy lock requirements (such as `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(...)` (Clang Thread Safety Analysis, see #11226), `AssertLockHeld(...)` and implicit lock assumptions). Tree-SHA512: 1aaeb1da89df1779f02fcceff9d2f8ea24a3926d421f9ea305a19be04dd0b3e63d91f6c1ed22fb7e6988343f6a5288829a387ef872cfa7b6add57bd01046b5d9
2017-11-10tests: Add missing locks to testspracticalswift
Add missing locks to tests to satisfy lock requirements (such as EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(...) (Clang Thread Safety Analysis), AssertLockHeld(...) and implicit lock assumptions).
2017-11-10Merge #11316: [qt] Add use available balance in send coins dialog (CryptAxe, ↵MarcoFalke
promag) d052e3847 [qt] Add use available balance in send coins dialog (CryptAxe) Pull request description: This is an alternative to #11098 to handle #11033 where a new button `Use available balance` is added to each entry. When activated, the available balance is calculated by using the coin control (if any) and then it's subtracted the remaining recipient amounts. If this amount is positive then the `Subtract fee from amount` is automatically selected. Comparing to #11098, this has the advantage to avoid the fair amount division over the recipients and allows to fine adjust the amounts in multiple iterations. Started from @CryptAxe commit 89e9eda to credit some code. <img width="965" alt="screen shot 2017-09-13 at 01 32 44" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3534524/30354518-e1bee31c-9824-11e7-9354-300aa63cdfd0.png"> <img width="964" alt="screen shot 2017-09-13 at 01 44 57" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3534524/30354598-5731ac9c-9825-11e7-9d5f-8781988ed219.png"> Tree-SHA512: 01d20c13fd8b6c2a0ca1d74d3a9027c6922e6dccd3b08e59d5a72636be7072ed5eca7ebc5d431299497dd3374e83753220ad4174d8bc46dadb4b2f54973036a5
2017-11-10Merge #11468: [tests] Make comp test framework more debuggableMarcoFalke
748157913 [tests] Make comp test framework more debuggable (John Newbery) Pull request description: We should remove the comparison test framework entirely (see #10603). Until we do that, let's make it a bit more debuggable. Currently, if there's an assert in the framework, it's very difficult to track down where we are in the test generator. Make the logging a bit better to help with debugging. Before this PR: ``` → ./p2p-fullblocktest.py 2017-10-09 14:05:11.302000 TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/user/1000/testzdnax_yr 2017-10-09 14:05:11.557000 TestFramework.mininode (INFO): Connecting to Bitcoin Node: 127.0.0.1:11975 2017-10-09 14:05:11.712000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Test 1: PASS 2017-10-09 14:05:11.947000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Test 2: PASS 2017-10-09 14:05:12.057000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Test 3: PASS 2017-10-09 14:05:12.058000 TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 117, in main self.run_test() File "./p2p-fullblocktest.py", line 72, in run_test self.test.run() File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/comptool.py", line 306, in run assert test_number != 4 AssertionError 2017-10-09 14:05:12.059000 TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes 2017-10-09 14:05:14.203000 TestFramework (WARNING): Not cleaning up dir /tmp/user/1000/testzdnax_yr 2017-10-09 14:05:14.204000 TestFramework (ERROR): Test failed. Test logging available at /tmp/user/1000/testzdnax_yr/test_framework.log ``` With this PR: ``` → ./p2p-fullblocktest.py 2017-10-09 14:03:54.069000 TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/user/1000/testuey7t3tf 2017-10-09 14:03:54.329000 TestFramework.mininode (INFO): Connecting to Bitcoin Node: 127.0.0.1:11783 2017-10-09 14:03:54.383000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Running test 1: ./p2p-fullblocktest.py line 184 2017-10-09 14:03:54.496000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Running test 2: ./p2p-fullblocktest.py line 193 2017-10-09 14:03:54.758000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Running test 3: ./p2p-fullblocktest.py line 205 2017-10-09 14:03:54.867000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Running test 4: ./p2p-fullblocktest.py line 208 2017-10-09 14:03:54.867000 TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 117, in main self.run_test() File "./p2p-fullblocktest.py", line 72, in run_test self.test.run() File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/comptool.py", line 309, in run assert test_number != 4 AssertionError 2017-10-09 14:03:54.868000 TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes 2017-10-09 14:03:56.950000 TestFramework (WARNING): Not cleaning up dir /tmp/user/1000/testuey7t3tf 2017-10-09 14:03:56.950000 TestFramework (ERROR): Test failed. Test logging available at /tmp/user/1000/testuey7t3tf/test_framework.log ``` Tree-SHA512: 5525958b0098d661c281bd955c92c72bf81359464376e96d44e6c88f18aea57ba08270ecd564edda4b47d674e3b27d20e5b1060544bf8dd5c6a68103d2bb35b8
2017-11-10Explicitly state assumption that state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr ↵practicalswift
in ConsiderEviction Static analyzer (and humans!) will see ... ``` else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout == 0 || (state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr && ... ``` ... and infer that state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header might be set to nullptr, and thus flag `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->GetBlockHash().ToString()` as a potential null pointer dereference. This commit makes the tacit assumption (m_work_header != nullptr) explicit. Code introduced in 5a6d00 ("Permit disconnection of outbound peers on bad/slow chains") which was merged into master four days ago.
2017-11-10Merge #11646: Require a steady clock for bench with at least micro precisionWladimir J. van der Laan
620bae3 Require a steady clock for bench with at least micro precision (Matt Corallo) Pull request description: Using a non-steady high_precision_clock by default is definitely not what we want, and in practice steady_clock has more than enough precision. Should double-check that travis passes on this one to make sure we actually have at least microsecond precision on all platforms. Tree-SHA512: 54a4af3b6addca9897e8ab04694f9461343691b475ca3ed2368595c37520612e284969be94a8ee3d7c66d16532f7bb16b6ad80284cbc153653e8ef2d56696e9d
2017-11-09Merge #11394: Perform a weaker subtree check in TravisMarcoFalke
487aff421 Check subtree consistency in Travis (Pieter Wuille) e1d0cc23a Improve git-subtree-check.sh (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: Apparently many of our subtrees get modified by PRs in this repository, without getting noticed. To improve upon this: * Make git-subtree-check.sh capable of doing a weaker consistency check (that doesn't need access to external repositories), but which should be sufficient to detect unintended changes. It can be fooled by a fake subtree merge commit, but that would hopefully be obvious to reviewers. * Make Travis invoke this subtree check for each of our subtrees. Note that Travis is currently expected to fail on this PR, as 2 out of 4 subtrees (`src/secp156k1` and `src/univalue` have been modified directly in master). Tree-SHA512: 465b680392d3daf38a8c1dda77d6f74b1d1c23324c378774777fb95aa673e119a8f7e3ccc124e41d97b5ac8975f3d79f3015797d2d309666582394364917ec4e
2017-11-09Merge #11649: Revert "Remove unused variable in shell script"MarcoFalke
fa0025dc3 Revert "Remove unused variable in shell script" (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This partially reverts commit ab8e8b97a359e1c4f1bca8e1769021c95019f2c4 (#10771), as the variable is still used. See for example #11394. Tree-SHA512: 1788d5471e1399d4a15d287cd8c41979833524e31b8fe61af8a7d20c9777828460d61ab87885a228ba7ca919f1d08703f4cb182d5840eb863e2154b3cf8ff4e6
2017-11-09Revert "Remove unused variable in shell script"MarcoFalke
This partially reverts commit ab8e8b97a359e1c4f1bca8e1769021c95019f2c4
2017-11-09Merge #11043: Use std::unique_ptr (C++11) where possibleWladimir J. van der Laan
a357293 Use MakeUnique<Db>(...) (practicalswift) 3e09b39 Use MakeUnique<T>(...) instead of std::unique_ptr<T>(new T(...)) (practicalswift) 8617989 Add MakeUnique (substitute for C++14 std::make_unique) (practicalswift) d223bc9 Use unique_ptr for pcoinscatcher/pcoinsdbview/pcoinsTip/pblocktree (practicalswift) b45c597 Use unique_ptr for pdbCopy (Db) and fix potential memory leak (practicalswift) 29ab96d Use unique_ptr for dbenv (DbEnv) (practicalswift) f72cbf9 Use unique_ptr for pfilter (CBloomFilter) (practicalswift) 8ccf1bb Use unique_ptr for sem{Addnode,Outbound} (CSemaphore) (practicalswift) 73db063 Use unique_ptr for upnp_thread (boost::thread) (practicalswift) 0024531 Use unique_ptr for dbw (CDBWrapper) (practicalswift) fa6d122 Use unique_ptr:s for {fee,short,long}Stats (TxConfirmStats) (practicalswift) 5a6f768 Use unique_ptr for httpRPCTimerInterface (HTTPRPCTimerInterface) (practicalswift) 860e912 Use unique_ptr for pwalletMain (CWallet) (practicalswift) Pull request description: Use `std::unique_ptr` (C++11) where possible. Rationale: 1. Avoid resource leaks (specifically: forgetting to `delete` an object created using `new`) 2. Avoid undefined behaviour (specifically: double `delete`:s) **Note to reviewers:** Please let me know if I've missed any obvious `std::unique_ptr` candidates. Hopefully this PR should cover all the trivial cases. Tree-SHA512: 9fbeb47b800ab8ff4e0be9f2a22ab63c23d5c613a0c6716d9183db8d22ddbbce592fb8384a8b7874bf7375c8161efb13ca2197ad6f24b75967148037f0f7b20c
2017-11-09Merge #10771: Remove unused variables in shell scriptsWladimir J. van der Laan
ab8e8b9 Remove unused variables in shell scripts. (practicalswift) Pull request description: Remove unused variables in shell scripts. Use `_` where we don't care about the result. Tree-SHA512: 35049e79ee432c805f061456c32902a92811b5214d50ce6770b22d1442cc5999ed53cfe05bb2347f6995ca33c707a0f3fe92d5829c0385c4a3e254953924cbc4